1
What is the shape of global leadership? PowerCollaborationProfile.com Take 3 minute survey online Note: 1. Data description The questionnaire has been published using electronic newsletters, social networks, often directed specifically toward special-interest-groups in these networks. Additionally, the questionnaire has been distributed with assistance from helpful researchers and practitioners by means of direct mail or blog posting. Consequently, data must be viewed with the caveat that respondnets are selected randomly. To allow for an adequate level of validity, only results with at least 20 responses in each data subgroup is presented # of respondents as of 23 May 2011: 802 Background: Are specific leadership styles dominant in in certain countries, industries be seniority or gender? Laissez-faire leadership Silo management Facilitator and collaborator Perfect dictatorship Map leadership styles based on Collaboration & Power Structure Contrast perception vs. Preferred Responses will be continously collected and results published as data validity allows In addition, background data of respondants are collected for: Gender, age, country, sector, position in company, area of employment and size of company Collaboration Gap for selected sub-groups Preliminary Collaboration Results 1 Preliminary Power Structure Results 1 Survey Results EXAMPLES FROM INNOVISOR ONA’S Average = 3,44 Average = 4,27 Country variance appear to have diminished (based on data primarily for Europe and US Power Distance Index Geert Hofstede (collected 1967-1973) Power Structure - share of respondents Innovisor (collected 2011)

PCP-Poster

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Poster presenting the Power Collaboration Profile.

Citation preview

Page 1: PCP-Poster

What is the shape of global leadership?

PowerCollaborationProfile.com

Take 3 minute

survey online

Note: 1. Data description

The questionnaire has been published using electronic

newsletters, social networks, often directed specifically toward

special-interest-groups in these networks. Additionally, the

questionnaire has been distributed with assistance from helpful

researchers and practitioners by means of direct mail or blog

posting. Consequently, data must be viewed with the caveat

that respondnets are selected randomly.

To allow for an adequate level of validity, only results with at

least 20 responses in each data subgroup is presented

# of respondents as of 23 May 2011: 802

Background:

Are specific leadership styles dominant in in certain countries, industries be seniority or gender?

Laissez-faire leadership Silo management Facilitator and collaborator Perfect dictatorship

Map leadership styles based on Collaboration & Power

Structure

Contrast perception vs. Preferred

Responses will be continously collected and results

published as data validity allows

In addition, background data of respondants are

collected for: Gender, age, country, sector, position in

company, area of employment and size of company

Collaboration Gap for

selected sub-groups

Preliminary Collaboration Results1

Preliminary Power Structure Results1

Survey Results

EXAMPLES FROM

INNOVISOR ONA’S

Average =

3,44

Average =

4,27

Country variance appear to have diminished

(based on data primarily for Europe and US

Power Distance Index

Geert Hofstede

(collected 1967-1973)

Power Structure - share of respondents

Innovisor

(collected 2011)