3
PCORnet: turning a dream into reality Francis S Collins, 1 Kathy L Hudson, 1 Josephine P Briggs, 2 Michael S Lauer 3 Many modern physician specialists like to think of their work as grounded in strong science. Yet 5 years ago, a group of cardiol- ogists published their ndings on the science underlying over 2700 practice recommendations issued by their specialty societies. 1 Only 314 (or 11%) were based on level A evidence, that is, evidence based on multiple well-done randomized trials. Nearly half of the recommendations were based solely on expert opinion.Even more disconcerting is the fact that despite the activities of many researchers, the vast majority of ongoing clinical trials are too small to provide evidence relevant to patients and clinicians. 2 Robust trials that can support recommendations grounded in solid science are few and far between, in part because they have become too expensive and complicated to run. Our biomedical enterprise is conducting many clinical trials, yet we may not be getting all that much for what we spend. 3 No wonder that too often, patients and caregivers seeking information on how best to improve their health or the health of their loved ones nd that biomedicine does not have answers for questions they ask. Too often, clinicians cannot tell patients which therapies are likely to work best for individuals like them. Too often risks, bene- ts, and impact on quality of life are uncer- tain. Providing accurate answers based on the highest levels of scientic evidence for the majority of unresolved clinical questions is a revolutionary dream shared by patients, providers, payers, health plans, researchers, and policy makers alike. PCORnet, the National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network, promises a transformative platform that will turn this revolutionary dream into reality. 4 The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) vision begins with patient-centeredness, which is fundamental to PCORnets struc- ture and aspirations. This model promises to engage patients intimately in the prioritization, design, and conduct of research, a collaboration that will help researchers develop more accurate and meaningful information for patients, their caregivers, and cliniciansinformation that will allow our healthcare systems to achieve the best possible clinical outcomes, and the outcomes that matter most to patients. PCORnet aims to build a national research network, linked by a common data platform and embedded in clinical care delivery systems. This network will enable studies, and in particular randomized trials, that have been impractical to conduct to dateand do so with economies of scale. For patients, participating in research will be simplied: studies will be easier to locate and privacy protections will be consistent. Participants will be true partners in the research. For researchers, a network of elec- tronic medical records representing over 100 million covered lives will make large-scale observational and interventional trials faster to launch, more representative of diverse real world populations, and capable of providing much-needed answers to comparative effectiveness research ques- tions with greater accuracy. Just a few examples of the kinds of questions that can be asked and answered using the PCORnet platform should excite anyone interested in improving healthcare: What are the best manage- ment strategies for localized prostate cancer? Which of the available primary care treatment strategies for children with attention decit hyperactivity disorder are most effective? What are the best treat- ment strategies for low back pain? Which interventions are most effective for redu- cing disparities in hypertension outcomes? For years, many of us have dreamed about what would be possible if we had the research infrastructure to conduct large cohort studies to understand genetic, behavioral, social, and environmental factors that contribute to health and illness, 5 and to implement large rando- mized trials at affordable cost, to drive continuous improvement in the standards of best clinical care. PCORnet can provide these capabilities, and do so in a real world setting. As a result, clinicians and healthcare systems will benet from an improved evidence base for their practices and recommendations, getting the most effective therapies into the hands of patients and improving healthcare deliv- ery. Furthermore, the timetable for trans- lation of research results into improved care can be signicantly shortened since the network carrying out the research is actually responsible for the care of almost one third of Americans. Under the leadership of PCORIs Executive Director, Joe Selby and the PCORI Board of Governors, on which one of us (FSC) serves, the PCORnet initiative has been launched. PCORI designed the initiatives Phase I details and issued PCORI funding announcements for establishing the coordinating center, clinical data research networks (CDRNs), and patient-powered research networks (PPRNs). The Coordinating Center, announced in September 2013, worked quickly to kick start planning with the PCORnet Steering Committee, on which two of us (JPB and KLH) participate, setting the stage for the arrival of the CDRNs and PPRNs. Diverse panels of reviewers carefully evaluated 28 CDRN and 61 PPRN applications, recom- mending 11 CDRNs and 18 PPRNs for funding. The announcement of the CDRNs and PPRNs in December 2013 launched a urry of activity to nalize this innovative networks governance and address funda- mental challenges to achieving a function- ing distributed research network within the next 18 months. There are still many challenges to be met in order for PCORnet to reach its ambitious goal of launching a simple prag- matic clinical trial by September 2015. PCORnet is establishing the fundamental data architecture and data standards (eg, the adoption of a data model) in a manner that will facilitate rapid implementation while leaving room for other approaches to grow and mature. Implementation will require incorporation of patient-generated outcomes, interoperable methods to query the electronic medical record, and common standards for biospecimens. Simultaneously, PCORnet is addressing key policy questions concerning the responsible conduct of research in this new environment, including informed consent, the use of central institutional review boards, and the protection of patient privacy. By addressing these and other major challenges, PCORnet has the poten- tial to improve the conduct of, and provide guidance for, large pragmatic trials con- ducted within PCORnet and beyond. Then the real work begins: conducting research. Building on the work of the PCORI Methodology Committee, 6 on which one of us (MSL) sits, the research con- ducted through PCORnet will strengthen the research communitys understanding of, 1 National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA; 2 National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA; 3 National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA Correspondence to Dr Kathy L Hudson, National Institutes of Health, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA; [email protected] 576 Collins FS, et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc July 2014 Vol 21 No 4 Editorial group.bmj.com on October 3, 2014 - Published by jamia.bmj.com Downloaded from

PCORnet: turning a dream into reality

  • Upload
    m-s

  • View
    214

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: PCORnet: turning a dream into reality

PCORnet: turning a dream into realityFrancis S Collins,1 Kathy L Hudson,1 Josephine P Briggs,2

Michael S Lauer3

Many modern physician specialists like tothink of their work as grounded in strongscience. Yet 5 years ago, a group of cardiol-ogists published their findings on thescience underlying over 2700 practicerecommendations issued by their specialtysocieties.1 Only 314 (or 11%) were basedon ‘level A’ evidence, that is, evidencebased on multiple well-done randomizedtrials. Nearly half of the recommendationswere based solely on ‘expert opinion.’Even more disconcerting is the fact thatdespite the activities of many researchers,the vast majority of ongoing clinical trialsare too small to provide evidence relevantto patients and clinicians.2 Robust trialsthat can support recommendationsgrounded in solid science are few and farbetween, in part because they have becometoo expensive and complicated to run.Our biomedical enterprise is conductingmany clinical trials, yet we may not begetting all that much for what we spend.3

No wonder that too often, patients andcaregivers seeking information on how bestto improve their health or the health oftheir loved ones find that biomedicine doesnot have answers for questions they ask.Too often, clinicians cannot tell patientswhich therapies are likely to work best forindividuals like them. Too often risks, bene-fits, and impact on quality of life are uncer-tain. Providing accurate answers based onthe highest levels of scientific evidence forthe majority of unresolved clinical questionsis a revolutionary dream shared by patients,providers, payers, health plans, researchers,and policy makers alike. PCORnet, theNational Patient-Centered Clinical ResearchNetwork, promises a transformativeplatform that will turn this revolutionarydream into reality.4 The Patient-CenteredOutcomes Research Institute (PCORI)vision begins with patient-centeredness,which is fundamental to PCORnet’s struc-ture and aspirations. This model promisesto engage patients intimately in the

prioritization, design, and conduct ofresearch, a collaboration that will helpresearchers develop more accurate andmeaningful information for patients, theircaregivers, and clinicians—information thatwill allow our healthcare systems to achievethe best possible clinical outcomes, and theoutcomes that matter most to patients.PCORnet aims to build a national

research network, linked by a common dataplatform and embedded in clinical caredelivery systems. This network will enablestudies, and in particular randomized trials,that have been impractical to conduct todate—and do so with economies of scale.For patients, participating in research willbe simplified: studies will be easier to locateand privacy protections will be consistent.Participants will be true partners in theresearch. For researchers, a network of elec-tronic medical records representing over100 million covered lives will makelarge-scale observational and interventionaltrials faster to launch, more representativeof diverse real world populations, andcapable of providing much-needed answersto comparative effectiveness research ques-tions with greater accuracy.Just a few examples of the kinds of

questions that can be asked and answeredusing the PCORnet platform shouldexcite anyone interested in improvinghealthcare: What are the best manage-ment strategies for localized prostatecancer? Which of the available primarycare treatment strategies for children withattention deficit hyperactivity disorder aremost effective? What are the best treat-ment strategies for low back pain? Whichinterventions are most effective for redu-cing disparities in hypertension outcomes?For years, many of us have dreamed

about what would be possible if we hadthe research infrastructure to conductlarge cohort studies to understand genetic,behavioral, social, and environmentalfactors that contribute to health andillness,5 and to implement large rando-mized trials at affordable cost, to drivecontinuous improvement in the standardsof best clinical care. PCORnet can providethese capabilities, and do so in a realworld setting. As a result, clinicians andhealthcare systems will benefit from animproved evidence base for their practicesand recommendations, getting the mosteffective therapies into the hands of

patients and improving healthcare deliv-ery. Furthermore, the timetable for trans-lation of research results into improvedcare can be significantly shortened sincethe network carrying out the research isactually responsible for the care of almostone third of Americans.

Under the leadership of PCORI’sExecutive Director, Joe Selby and thePCORI Board of Governors, on which oneof us (FSC) serves, the PCORnet initiativehas been launched. PCORI designed theinitiative’s Phase I details and issued PCORIfunding announcements for establishing thecoordinating center, clinical data researchnetworks (CDRNs), and patient-poweredresearch networks (PPRNs). TheCoordinating Center, announced inSeptember 2013, worked quickly to kickstart planning with the PCORnet SteeringCommittee, on which two of us ( JPB andKLH) participate, setting the stage for thearrival of the CDRNs and PPRNs. Diversepanels of reviewers carefully evaluated 28CDRN and 61 PPRN applications, recom-mending 11 CDRNs and 18 PPRNs forfunding. The announcement of the CDRNsand PPRNs in December 2013 launched aflurry of activity to finalize this innovativenetwork’s governance and address funda-mental challenges to achieving a function-ing distributed research network within thenext 18 months.

There are still many challenges to bemet in order for PCORnet to reach itsambitious goal of launching a simple prag-matic clinical trial by September 2015.PCORnet is establishing the fundamentaldata architecture and data standards (eg,the adoption of a data model) in a mannerthat will facilitate rapid implementationwhile leaving room for other approachesto grow and mature. Implementation willrequire incorporation of patient-generatedoutcomes, interoperable methods to querythe electronic medical record, andcommon standards for biospecimens.Simultaneously, PCORnet is addressingkey policy questions concerning theresponsible conduct of research in this newenvironment, including informed consent,the use of central institutional reviewboards, and the protection of patientprivacy. By addressing these and othermajor challenges, PCORnet has the poten-tial to improve the conduct of, and provideguidance for, large pragmatic trials con-ducted within PCORnet and beyond.

Then the real work begins: conductingresearch. Building on the work of thePCORI Methodology Committee,6 onwhich one of us (MSL) sits, the research con-ducted through PCORnet will strengthenthe research community’s understanding of,

1National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland,USA; 2National Center for Complementary andAlternative Medicine, National Institutes of Health,Bethesda, Maryland, USA; 3National Heart, Lung andBlood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda,Maryland, USA

Correspondence to Dr Kathy L Hudson, NationalInstitutes of Health, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda,MD 20892, USA; [email protected]

576 Collins FS, et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc July 2014 Vol 21 No 4

Editorial

group.bmj.com on October 3, 2014 - Published by jamia.bmj.comDownloaded from

Page 2: PCORnet: turning a dream into reality

and capacity for, patient-centered research,including a heavy emphasis on randomizedtrials that focus on patient-centered out-comes. The network will be faced with thechallenging yet exciting prospect of identify-ing the highest priority projects for thePCORnet platform to take on. Other orga-nizations will be invited into the tent andresearchers not directly affiliated withPCORnet will be able to conduct researchin the network through collaborations.Ultimately, if this platform is able to demon-strate its value and revolutionary potential,PCORnet will face the test of sustainability:it will need to establish partners that wish touse this platform for research, and developself-sustaining sources of support in acomplex and challenging budgetary envir-onment. Speaking as one such potentialpartner, the National Institutes of Health iseager to support studies that will be con-ducted in PCORnet and to develop initia-tives that we hope will be among the first tomake use of this important resource.

PCORnet holds the promise to trans-form clinical research—but many chal-lenges lie ahead. For ultimate success, allthose involved in shaping this revolution-ary dream must maintain the bold andvisionary attitude that enabled its creation.This is not your father’s clinical trialnetwork.

Acknowledgements The authors express sinceregratitude to Gwynne Jenkins for assistance inpreparation of this manuscript.

Contributors All authors contributed sufficiently.

Competing interests None.

Provenance and peer review Commissioned;internally peer reviewed.

Open Access This is an Open Access articledistributed in accordance with the Creative CommonsAttribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license,which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, buildupon this work non-commercially, and license theirderivative works on different terms, provided theoriginal work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/

To cite Collins FS, Hudson KL, Briggs JP, et al. J AmMed Inform Assoc 2014;21:576–577.

Accepted 8 April 2014

Published Online First 12 May 2014

▸ http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002747▸ http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002758▸ http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002764▸ http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002744▸ http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002746▸ http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002743▸ http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002827▸ http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002740▸ http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002727▸ http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002751▸ http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002745▸ http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002759▸ http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002756

J Am Med Inform Assoc 2014;21:576–577.doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002864

REFERENCES1 Tricoci P, Allen J, Kramer J, et al. Scientific evidence

underlying the ACC/AHA clinical practice guidelines.JAMA 2009;301:831–41.

2 Califf R, Zarin D, Kramer J, et al. Characteristics ofclinical trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov, 2007–2010. JAMA 2012;307:1838–47.

3 Devereaux P, Yusuf S. When it comes to trials, do weget what we pay for? NEJM 2013;369:1962–3.

4 Selby J, Krumholz H, Kuntz R, et al. Network news:powering clinical research. Sci Trnsl Med 2013;5:1–3.

5 Collins F. The case for a US prospective cohort study ofgenes and environment. Nature 2004;429:475–7.

6 http://www.pcori.org/assets/2013/11/PCORI-Methodology-Report.pdf (accessed Apr 2014).

Open AccessScan to access more

free content

Collins FS, et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc July 2014 Vol 21 No 4 577

Editorial

group.bmj.com on October 3, 2014 - Published by jamia.bmj.comDownloaded from

Page 3: PCORnet: turning a dream into reality

doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002864May 12, 2014

2014 21: 576-577 originally published onlineJ Am Med Inform Assoc Francis S Collins, Kathy L Hudson, Josephine P Briggs, et al. PCORnet: turning a dream into reality

http://jamia.bmj.com/content/21/4/576.full.htmlUpdated information and services can be found at:

These include:

References http://jamia.bmj.com/content/21/4/576.full.html#ref-list-1

This article cites 5 articles

Open Access

non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use iswork non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon thisCreative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the

serviceEmail alerting

the box at the top right corner of the online article.Receive free email alerts when new articles cite this article. Sign up in

CollectionsTopic

(168 articles)Open access   � (74 articles)Editor's choice   �

 Articles on similar topics can be found in the following collections

Notes

http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissionsTo request permissions go to:

http://journals.bmj.com/cgi/reprintformTo order reprints go to:

http://group.bmj.com/subscribe/To subscribe to BMJ go to:

group.bmj.com on October 3, 2014 - Published by jamia.bmj.comDownloaded from