PCCPA 11-01 report - Plan HillsboroughThis action created a number of legal non‐conforming uses and some of these ... bicycle shops, locksmiths, etc. Small‐scale, limited‐seating

601 E. Kennedy, 18th Floor

P.O. Box 1110Tampa, FL 33601-1110

813/272-5940FAX 813/272-6258FAX 813/272-6255

www.theplanningcommission.org

Hillsborough County

City-County

Planning

Commission

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Meeting Date: November 14, 2011 – Public Hearing

Agenda Item: Plant City: PC/CPA 11‐01 – Laura Street

Presenter: J. Collins, Ext: 335

Action Necessary: Yes

SUMMARY

The Planning Commission will be reviewing and making a recommendation

to the Plant City City Commission on this publicly initiated map amendment

to change Future Land Use designations from Residential–6 (6 du/ga) and

Residential‐12 (12 du/ga) to Light Commercial/Office (.35 FAR, 10 du/ga) on

approximately 11.6± acres.

The Planning Commission is required to make recommendations to the Plant

City City Commission on all proposed changes to the Comprehensive Plan for

the City of Plant City pursuant to Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes and

Chapter 97‐351 Laws of Florida, as amended.

BACKGROUND

This is a publicly initiated map amendment for 11.6 acres± located east of

Midtown, centered along Laura Street between Michigan Avenue and

Warnell Street in the neighborhood of Lincoln Park. The City in conjunction

with the neighborhood has requested a change in designation to further

redevelopment and to afford economic opportunities within this historic

African‐American neighborhood. In furthering the redevelopment of this

area, the City has conducted a study and programmed significant public

improvements over the past ten years for the Lincoln Park neighborhood.

The proposed change will further the vision and goals as expressed by the

residents of Lincoln Park and the City of Plant City.

RECOMMENDATION

It is recommended that the Planning Commission APPROVE the attached

resolution finding the proposed map amendment, PC/CPA 11‐01,

CONSISTENT with the Comprehensive Plan for the City of Plant City and

forward this recommendation to the Plant City City Commission.

Attachments: Resolution, Staff Report, Map Series, Agency Comments

Date Prepared: October 25, 2011

THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK


P.O. Box 1110Tampa, FL 33601-1110

813/272-5940FAX 813/272-6258FAX 813/272-6255

www.theplanningcommission.org

RESOLUTION ITEM: Plant City: PC/CPA 11‐01 – Laura Street

AYE

NAY

ABSENT

DATE:

November 14, 2011

Frank M. Chillura Vice-Chair Derek L. Doughty Member-at-Large

Frank M. Chillura, Vice Chair

Bowen A. Arnold Jill Buford

Bruce P. Cury Brian P. Hollands Gary D. Sears Mitch Thrower Jacqueline S. Wilds

Ray Young

Robert B. Hunter, FAICP Executive Director

Robert B. Hunter, Executive Director

On motion of Seconded by .

The following resolution was adopted:

WHEREAS, the Hillsborough County City‐County Planning

Commission has developed a Comprehensive Plan for the City of Plant City,

pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 163.3161, Florida Statutes, which was

originally adopted by the Plant City City Commission on July 14, 1989

(Ordinance 20‐1989) and most recently updated on April 13, 2009 (Ordinance

11‐2009); and


Commission has received a privately initiated amendment to the Future Land

Use Map of the Comprehensive Plan for the City of Plant City; and


Commission has reviewed PC/CPA 11‐01 to amend the Future Land Use Map

from Residenital‐6 and Residential‐12 to Light Commercial/Office located in

the vicinity of Laura Street between Michigan Avenue and Warnell Street

south of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd; and

Hillsborough County

City-County

Planning

Commission

RESOLUTION Plant City: PC/CPA 11‐01 – Laura Street

November 14, 2011 Page 2


Commission staff has reviewed the proposal considering existing and expected

future development patterns and community facilities in the respective area;

and


Commission has reviewed the proposal and the adopted goals, objectives and

policies of the Comprehensive Plan for the City of Plant City as stated in the staff

report as follows:

Future Land Use Element

Policy 7.A.4: The City shall support infill development, the use of master plans (e.g.

Midtown Redevelopment Vision Plan, Northeast Plant City Area Master Plan, etc.)

and employ mixed‐use land use plan categories, as appropriate, during the land

development review (map amendments, rezonings, site plans) process to reduce energy

consumption (to in part delay the need for additional electric power

generation/transmission systems), discourage urban sprawl and advance efficient land

use patterns in Plant City.

Policy 7.D.4: The City shall give priority to neighborhood and commercial

redevelopment projects in those areas where conditions of physical, economic, and / or

social blight exist.

Policy 7.D.5: Development and redevelopment shall be integrated with adjacent land

uses through: creation of like uses; creation of complementary uses; or mitigation of

adverse impacts.

Policy 7.E.1: Ensure that the location and timing of new development will be

coordinated with the Cityʹs ability to provide public facilities through implementation

of growth management measures such as development phasing, programming of public

facilities and zoning and subdivision regulations.

Policy 8.A.16: One of the implementation strategies the City shall use to attract

business and economic investment is to build an appealing and livable city. Some of the

elements of an appealing and livable city include: economic opportunity, a sense of

place and community, attractiveness, mobility options, feeling of safety, a mix of uses

and open spaces.

RESOLUTION Plant City: PC/CPA 11‐01 – Laura Street

November 14, 2011 Page 3

Housing Element

Policy C.1: The City shall encourage mixed‐income and mixed‐use development that

makes the most effective use of existing or new infrastructure as a means to facilitate

community sustainability, affordable housing and to promote the “hometown” charm of

Plant City.

Policy C.12: The City recognizes that a housing supply with a wide range of different

types and prices is an important strategy to maintain and expand a diverse workforce

to promote a stand‐alone economy, and in this regard the municipality shall continue

to promote this concept in collaboration with non‐ and for‐profit developers in Plant

City.

Objective D: Provide adequate supporting infrastructure, i.e., paved streets,

sidewalks, street lights, sanitary sewer, drainage, potable water, etc. throughout the

community to complement the residential neighborhoods and “hometown charm” of

Plant City.

Public Facilities Element

Objective 1.A: The City of Plant City will continue to implement procedures to

ensure that at the time a development permit is issued, capacity, consistent with the

level‐of‐service standards, is available, or will be available, when needed to serve the

development.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Hillsborough County

City‐County Planning Commission finds the requested plan amendment

CONSISTENT with the Comprehensive Plan for the City of Plant City and

recommends PC/CPA 11‐01 – Laura Street be approved.


City of Plant City, PC/CPA 11‐01 Page 1

Comprehensive Plan for the City of Plant City:

“Embracing the Future, while Preserving our Past”

Plant City: PC/CPA 11‐01 – Laura Street

I. Description of Plan Amendment Request

This publicly initiated map amendment of 11.6± acres (acreage total exclusive of right‐

of‐way) is located just east of Midtown centered along Laura Street between Michigan

Avenue and Warnell Street in the neighborhood of Lincoln Park. Under its current

future land use categories, these properties could potentially be developed with as

many as 78 dwelling units and a variety of residential support uses such as churches,

schools or parks. The current land use categories do not permit the potential range of

uses desired by the residents and property owners to further the economic

development goals of the community and Plant City. The change to Light

Commercial/Office from Residential‐6 and Residential‐12 will introduce uses not

currently considered under the existing future land use categories that were established

in 1989.

Background

In 1998 and revisited in 2003, the City of Plant City conducted a study to promote the

redevelopment and restoration of Laura Street. The goal of this “Restoration Plan” was to

identify and create a vision for this historic corridor and restore the legacy of Laura

Street as the heart/core of the local African‐American community of Lincoln Park. This

business district once included corner grocery stores, barber and beauty salons,

restaurants, gas stations, boarding houses, funeral homes and even a movie theatre.

The study focused on creating an identity, improving public safety and perception,

installing or repairing

infrastructure, removing

code violations, adding

public amenities and the

redevelopment of Marie B.

Ellis Park.

Laura Street historically was

a neighborhood commercial

corridor zoned C‐1A

(neighborhood business

district), this zoning allowed

PC/CPA 11‐01, Plan Amendment Area

Page 2 City of Plant City, PC/CPA 11‐01

the uses listed above. However the

zoning did not conform to the future

land use and was subsequently

downzoned following the study in 2003.

This action created a number of legal

non‐conforming uses and some of these

businesses are still operating today.

The area has seen an infusion of public

dollars including the creation of a seven

acre man‐made lake with a 0.6 mile

walking path, which was designed in

part to address the flooding issues that have plagued the Lincoln Park neighborhood in

the past. Other public investment includes resurfacing and pedestrian improvements

along Laura Street within the study area, Marie B. Ellis Park improvements, the

restoration of the historic Bing Boarding House, now a local African‐American

museum, and the purchasing of numerous distressed properties by the city of Plant

City. The City currently owns 1.6 acres within the amendment area and has pursued

affordable housing redevelopment to build a quality housing stock for the area and has

had some success with this venture. Habitat for Humanity has built a number of homes

in the Lincoln Park neighborhood. A village

concept is now taking shape as new homes

have been constructed, existing legal non‐

conforming businesses continue to operate

and property owners and residents have

approached the City interested in the

opportunity to recreate a neighborhood scale

commercial corridor.

The City after twice meeting (once in March

and again in August) with neighborhood

residents is requesting a Light

Commercial/Office Land Use Plan Category intended for areas where limited, less‐

intensive commercial/office uses are more appropriate than those uses permitted in the

general “commercial” land‐use category due to the area’s proximity to residential,

institutional, and/or recreational areas. Appropriate sites for these types of uses,

include areas where it would enhance existing or planned development patterns,

adequate public facilities are available or will be available concurrent with development

and is expected to meet existing or future market demands within and around the City

of Plant City. Light Commercial/Office uses are most commonly neighborhood serving

New Construction along Laura Street

Community Outreach Meeting


uses, such as personal service, small office, low‐intensity retail, where manufacturing,

wholesale distribution, warehousing and mini‐storage, outside storage, or other visible

signs of intensive‐commercial enterprise will not be permitted. Examples of light

commercial/office uses include:

Professional business offices for low‐traffic professions, such as attorneys,

accountants, professional engineers, mental‐health professionals, small‐practice

medical offices (not multiple medical‐discipline clinics), etc.

Low‐traffic personal‐service establishments, such as barber and beauty shops, nail

salons, photography studios, dry cleaners, mortgage companies, insurance agents,

interior decorators, electronic‐equipment repair, shoe repair, daycare centers, etc.

Low‐volume retail stores, such as florists, quick‐print shops, cell‐phone outlets,

bicycle shops, locksmiths, etc.

Small‐scale, limited‐seating restaurants and sandwich shops (not fast food and/or

drive‐through‐service establishments).

Worship‐only small churches and synagogues.

The Light Commercial/Office Plan Category allows for mixed‐use development and

provides for intensities of up to 0.35 floor area ratio (FAR) and residential densities up

to a maximum of 10 dwelling units per gross acre. A community unit zoning district is

being developed with neighborhood input to ensure the type and scale of development

is compatible with the surrounding uses in Lincoln Park.

Characteristics of the Category:

Does not allow general highway or intense commercial uses.

Perimeters should be buffered from adjacent residential, institutional, and

recreational areas.

Non‐residential uses shall not exceed a 0.35 FAR.

Residential densities may be considered up to a maximum of 10 DU/GA.


Relationship to the Street System:

Uses shall be limited to light commercial or office uses, which have limited

transportation trip‐generation attributes and parking requirements, and that

have negligible impact on adjacent non‐commercial uses.

Light Commercial/Office areas shall have direct frontage on arterial or collector

streets, or shall be accessible from arterial or collector streets via connecting local

streets that do not pass through existing or planned residential areas.

The potential build‐out for this parcel under its existing and proposed land use is

shown in the table below:

Potential Build‐Out based on Future Land Use Plan Category Designations

Existing Potential:

78 Dwelling Units

Potential If Amendment Is Approved:

116 Dwelling Units

or

176,853 sq. ft. non‐residential uses

(or a combination thereof)

The following report analyzes this proposed amendment within the context of the

municipality’s future “vision”, its compatibility with surrounding lands, the availability

of public facilities, compliance with current legislation and professional planning

Funeral Home

One Time Commercial Structure

Now Utilized As A Church


standards, and its overall consistency with the Comprehensive Plan for the City of Plant

City.

II. Vision and Context

Big Picture ‐ Vision

Based on Plant City’s Strategic Guide, along with interviews with elected and appointed

officials, the business community, staff and local residents a Vision Map was developed

for the City of Plant City. The Vision Map provides a generalized big picture view of the

future of the City of Plant City. The Vision Map

is not intended to be detailed, but rather to

provide guidance and support the policy

direction contained within the Comprehensive

Plan for the City of Plant City.

To offer a greater variety of living and working

environments, major mixed‐use developments

have been planned for and are expected in three

locations in Plant City one of these is the

Midtown Redevelopment District, located just

west of the amendment site, PC/CPA 11‐01. This

eighty‐five acre district, just to the south of the

historic downtown, calls for additional multi‐

family uses to support increases in retail,

commercial and office space development. A

village green is planned as a passive recreation

anchor for Midtown. Redevelopment projects

within this area are allowed up to a .35 FAR and 20 du/ga. These intensities and

densities are higher than those found under Light Commercial/Office. The close

proximity of the proposed amendment may likely benefit from synergy created by the

redevelopment of Midtown and Downtown Plant City.

Within the Context of the Comprehensive Plan for the City of Plant City

Through policy direction and planning techniques, Plant City promotes compact

mixed‐use and infill development that encourages walking, biking and establishes

higher intensity and density activity nodes. These practices reduce the number and

length of vehicular trips. Plant City strives to live by the motto of “Embracing the Future,

while Preserving our Past”.

Plant City Vision Map


The Comprehensive Plan for the City of Plant City encourages commercial and office

activity centers in nearby settings such as the Historic Downtown, the Midtown

Redevelopment District and specific interstate interchanges where available land,

transportation and other public facilities provide a suitable environment to develop

services to support the population of the City of Plant City. The amendment site,

PC/CPA 11‐01 is located within ½ mile of both the Midtown Redevelopment District

and Historic Downtown and is seeking a Light Commercial/Office Future Land Use

designation a category that is complimentary to both residential and commercial

neighborhoods. Plant City does not want to be a bedroom community for the Cities of

Tampa and Lakeland; Plant City values the entrepreneurial spirit of its residents. Plant

City’s employment base is forecasted to increase by 7,860 under the current planning

horizon of 2025, with the majority of this employment occurring in regional and local

service uses commonly associated with the Light Commercial/Office Future Land Use

Category.

Surrounding and Adjacent Lands

Areas to the west and northwest of the

map amendment site PC/CPA 11‐01

include the Midtown Redevelopment

District (Commercial Category), industrial

lands, much of these lands underutilized,

and the Historic Downtown. The lands to

the south and east are currently designated

Residential‐6 and are comprised of single

family detached housing and a variety of

residential support uses including churches

and Lincoln Elementary School.

Immediately north of the area is Samuel W. Cooper Park. This park was dedicated

October 18, 2005 and named to honor longtime civic and community leader Samuel W.

Cooper for his many years of dedicated service to the community and Plant City. The

eleven acre park contains a seven acre lake which was developed to help prevent

flooding from stormwater events in Lincoln Park. The park also includes a paved and

lighted 0.6 mile walking trail and benches.

The 11.6 acre plan amendment contains approximately 93 parcels ranging in size from a

1,000 square feet to 20,000 square feet, the majority of the properties are between 4,000

and 5,000 square feet. Churches own or occupy 2.4 acres, the City owns 1.6 acres the

remaining majority of the property is in private ownership. Three acres or slightly

more than ¼ of all property within the amendment area is vacant. Non‐residential uses

Samuel W. Cooper Park


(3.25 acres) in the area include funeral homes (appearing as public use on an ELU map)

and a couple of legal non‐conforming commercial uses (such as beauty salons).

The proposed land use category will encourage local economic development by

allowing residents the opportunity to operate a small business such as a barbershop or

florist as well as live in the structure. This type of development known as live/work

units allow for low capital costs compared to conventional stand alone brick and mortar

shops. This type of arrangement allows the area to retain its neighborhood identity,

when a business closes for the day the structure is still a residence and activity within

the neighborhood continues as usual. The City is concurrently developing a

community unit zoning district, to further guide development and ensure compatibility

with surrounding properties, while maintaining and promoting the character of Lincoln

Park.

Additionally, property owners may take the more traditional route and convert or build

a structure solely for the purpose of operating a business. The proposed zoning for the

area contains a number of provisions to ease the cost of development such as reduced

parking requirements.

III. Plan Amendment Impacts/Issues

Potable Water and Sanitary Sewer

Plant City has adequate capacity to serve the potential development associated with

PC/CPA 11‐01. Reference the attachments for a more detailed analysis of potential

water consumption and wastewater generation, as provided by the Plant City City

Engineer.

Solid Waste

There is adequate capacity at Plant City’s solid waste transfer facility to serve the

potential uses allowed by PC/CPA 11‐01.

Stormwater

When this site is redeveloped, adequate stormwater storage and treatment facilities will

need to be in place to comply with the rules and provisions of the City of Plant City, as

well as the Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD).

Transportation

No capacity issues are forecasted by the proposed amendment. No improvements are

programmed within the Plant City Capital Improvements Element for the immediate

area. The complete transportation impact analysis can be reviewed in its entirety, as

part of the Attachments.


Recreation and Open Space

The municipality will continue to maintain its adopted level‐of‐service for parkland, as

noted in the recently adopted Recreation and Open Space Element of Plant City.

Public Schools

There is currently adequate school capacity to serve the maximum potential residential

build‐out of 116 residential units.

“The subject parcel is served by Jackson Elementary School, Marshall Middle School, and Plant

City High School. All three schools have available capacity at this time with sufficient student

stations to accommodate the residential development that may be generated by the amendment.”

The Hillsborough County School District’s comments can be reviewed in their entirety

as part of the Attachments.

Environmental Issues

The 100 year flood plane is located throughout the amendment area. The City of Plant

City has invested heavily in stormwater reduction with the creation of Cooper Park and

its seven acre lake.

Intergovernmental Coordination

Staff requested cursory review comments from 1) Hillsborough County: Development

Services; Fire Rescue; Sheriff’s Office; Solid Waste Department; Public Works

Department; Recreation Department; 2) City of Plant City: City Manager; City Attorney;

Fire Department; Planning and Zoning Department; City Engineer; Community

Development Department; Police Department; Public Works Department; Parks and

Recreation Department; 3) Other Agencies: Hillsborough County Aviation Authority;

Environmental Protection Commission of Hillsborough County; Florida Department of

Transportation; Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council; Hillsborough County School

District; Southwest Florida Water Management District and Tampa Bay Water. Other

than those comments already noted; no significant comments on this map amendment

have been received as of September 30, 2011. Comments received to date are included

within the Attachments.


IV. Relationship to the Comprehensive Plan

The plan amendment request is consistent with the following objectives and policies of

the Comprehensive Plan for the City of Plant City:


Policy 2.B.1: The City shall encourage the development of shopping nodes rather than scattered

unplanned commercial development in order to limit the number of curb cuts and to reduce

conflicts in land uses, particularly along collectors and arterials. Objective 7.A: In all actions of the City, urban sprawl shall be discouraged and a compact

urban pattern of development shall be provided for in a manner which will promote the

conversation of energy resources, the reduction of greenhouse gases, the full utilization of

existing public infrastructure, and allow for the orderly extension and expansion of municipal

facilities in a fiscally responsible manner within Plant City. Policy 7.A.4: The City shall support infill development, the use of master plans (e.g. Midtown

Redevelopment Vision Plan, Northeast Plant City Area Master Plan, etc.) and employ mixed‐

use land use plan categories, as appropriate, during the land development review (map

amendments, rezonings, site plans) process to reduce energy consumption (to in part delay the

need for additional electric power generation/transmission systems), discourage urban sprawl

and advance efficient land use patterns in Plant City.

Policy 7.D.4: The City shall give priority to neighborhood and commercial redevelopment

projects in those areas where conditions of physical, economic, and/or social blight exist.

Policy 7.D.5: Development and redevelopment shall be integrated with adjacent land uses

through: creation of like uses; creation of complementary uses; or mitigation of adverse impacts.

Policy 7.E.1: Ensure that the location and timing of new development will be coordinated with

the Cityʹs ability to provide public facilities through implementation of growth management

measures such as development phasing, programming of public facilities and zoning and

subdivision regulations.

Policy 8.A.16: One of the implementation strategies the City shall use to attract business and

economic investment is to build an appealing and livable city. Some of the elements of an

appealing and livable city include: economic opportunity, a sense of place and community,

attractiveness, mobility options, feeling of safety, a mix of uses and open spaces.


Housing Element

Policy C.1: The City shall encourage mixed‐income and mixed‐use development that makes the

most effective use of existing or new infrastructure as a means to facilitate community

sustainability, affordable housing and to promote the “hometown” charm of Plant City.

Policy C.12: The City recognizes that a housing supply with a wide range of different types and

prices is an important strategy to maintain and expand a diverse workforce to promote a stand‐

alone economy, and in this regard the municipality shall continue to promote this concept in

collaboration with non‐ and for‐profit developers in Plant City.

Objective D: Provide adequate supporting infrastructure, i.e., paved streets, sidewalks, street

lights, sanitary sewer, drainage, potable water, etc. throughout the community to complement

the residential neighborhoods and “hometown charm” of Plant City.

Public Facilities Element

Objective 1.A: The City of Plant City will continue to implement procedures to ensure that at

the time a development permit is issued, capacity, consistent with the level‐of‐service standards,

is available, or will be available, when needed to serve the development.

V. Analysis and Conclusion

The proposed plan category supports the

overall vision of the Comprehensive Plan for the

City of Plant City and furthers the reinvention

of this neighborhood as desired by those who

reside within it. The amendment advances

and expands upon the “Restoration Plan” for

Laura Street which is in part the impetus for

this amendment. The amendment will foster

and provide a foundation for an economic

resurgence for Laura Street and the

neighborhood of Lincoln Park. All public

facilities (i.e. water, sewer, transportation,

etc.) are in place and adequate to serve the potential maximum build‐out of PC/CPA 11‐

01. The proposed plan amendment furthers the policy direction and planning techniques as

expressed within the Comprehensive Plan for the City of Plant City, Plant City will

Community Outreach Meeting


promote compact mixed‐use and infill

development which in turn encourages

walking and biking, along with establishing

higher intensity and density activity nodes,

which will reduce the number and length of

vehicular trips. The Light Commercial/Office

designation does allow for consideration of a

mixed‐use component that is complementary

to targeted areas for future job creation and

residential growth. The amendment supports

the concept of promoting development

where adequate public facilities are currently available in Plant City. A Light

Commercial/Office designated area in close proximity to the Midtown Redevelopment

District and Downtown is a logical choice to provide greater redevelopment options for

the area as well as providing a neighborhood focal point. The propose change is

supported by policy direction contained in the Comprehensive Plan for the City of Plant

City.

VI. Recommendation

Staff recommends that PC/CPA 11‐01 be approved, amending the identified parcels

from Residential‐6 and Residenital‐12 to Light Commercial/Office Land Use Plan

Category finding the proposal consistent with the Comprehensive Plan for the City of Plant

City, Future Land Use Element, Objectives and Policies 2.B.1, 7.A, 7.A.4, 7.D.4, 7.D.5,

7.E.1 and 8.A.16; Housing Element, Policies C.1, C.12 and Objective D and Public

Facilities Element, Objective 1.A.

Prepared By: Jay Collins, AICP September 30, 2011

Historic Bing House


(This page intentionally left blank)


Attachment A

Aerial

Existing Land Use Map

Adopted Future Land Use Map

Proposed Future Land Use Map



N P

ENN

SYLV

AN

IA A

VE

E WARREN ST

E OHIO ST

E J ARDEN MAYS BLVD

S PALM

ER ST

MAGUIRE ST

FAIS

ON

ST

S JACKSON ST

E MADISON ST

ASH AVE

LIN

CO

LN S

T

S K

NIG

HT

ST

DRANE ST SE

W RENFRO ST

SAPP ST

GR

EEN

ST

S FO

RES

T ST

E MAHONEY ST

HIT

CH

CO

CK

ST

N G

OR

DO

N S

T

TENNESSEE ST

N M

ERR

IN S

T

MIC

HIG

AN

AVE

SPRUCE ST

N K

NIG

HT

ST

E CHURCH ST

SPRING ST

W BALL ST

S WHEELER ST

E HERRING ST

CORONET ST

S JO

HN

SON

ST

N C

OLLIN

S ST

WA

TER

ST S

WA

RN

ELL

ST

JENKINS ST

E WARREN ST

E RENFRO ST

S CO

LLINS ST

S G

OR

DO

N S

T

ALL

EN S

T

S EV

ERS

ST

E REYNOLDS ST

E OHIO ST

S LA

KE

ST

E ALABAMA ST

E LAURA ST

E BAKER ST

W REYNOLDS ST

E DR MARTIN LUTHER KING JR BLVD

S M

OR

GA

N S

T

AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY: Hillsborough County 2010

MAJOR ROADS: See Adopted MPO Long Range Transportation Plan for specific improvements.

PARCEL LINES: from Hillsborough County Property Appraiser.

REPRODUCTION: This sheet may not be reproduced in part or full for sale to anyone without specific approval of the Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission.

ACCURACY: It is intended that the accuracy of the base map comply with U.S. national map accuracy standards. However, such accuracy is not guaranteed by the Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission.

LEGENDS: The Future Land Use designations on this legend depict valid land use colors and codes for

μ

AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY

PLANT CITY

JURISDICTION BOUNDARY

COUNTY BOUNDARY

PLAN AMENDMENT AREA

AUHTOR: C.WELSHDATE: 04/07/11

PROJECT: G:\GISROOT\PROJECTS\CATHY\ARCMAP\PCPA\PCPA1101_OPTION3_AERIAL.MXD

Feet0 1,200 2,400 3,600 4,800600

PC/CPA 11-01

µ

DATA SOURCES: Parcel lines and data from Hillsborough County Property Appraiser. REPRODUCTION: This sheet may not be reproduced in part or full for sale to anyone without specific approval of the Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission.ACCURACY: It is intended that the accuracy of the base map comply with U.S. national map accuracy standards. However, such accuracy is not guaranteed by the Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission.

AUTHOR:WELSHDATE:03/02/11

PROJECT:g:/gisroot/projects/cathy/arcmap/pcpa/pcpa1101e.mxd

E ALSOBROOK ST

S COL

LINS

ST

N PE

NNSY

LVAN

IA A

VE

E WARREN ST

E OHIO ST

E J ARDEN MAYS BLVD

S PALMER ST

MAGUIRE ST

FAISO

N ST

S JACKSON ST

E MADISON ST

ASH AVE

LINCO

LN ST

S KNI

GHT S

T

DRANE ST SE

W RENFRO ST

SAPP ST

S FOR

EST S

T

E MAHONEY ST

HITC

HCOC

K ST

N GO

RDON

ST

TENNESSEE ST

N ME

RRIN

ST

MICH

IGAN

AVE

SPRUCE ST

N KN

IGHT

ST

E CHURCH ST

SPRING ST

W BALL ST

S WHEELER ST

E HERRING ST

CORONET ST

S JOH

NSON

ST

N COLLINS ST

WATE

R ST S W

ARNE

LL ST

JENKINS ST

E WARREN ST

E RENFRO ST

S COLLINS ST

S GOR

DON

ST

ALLE

N ST

S EVE

RS ST

E REYNOLDS ST

E OHIO ST

S LAK

E ST

E ALABAMA ST

E LAURA ST

E BAKER ST

LOUISIANA ST

W REYNOLDS ST


S MOR

GAN

ST

MICH

IGAN

AVE

PLANT CITYEXISTING LAND USE

0 250 500 750 1,000125Feet

Derived from Property AppraiserParcels and NAL DOR Codes

PC/CPA 11-01

SINGLE FAMILY / MOBILE HOMETWO FAMILYMULTI-FAMILYMOBILE HOME PARKVACANTPUBLIC / QUASIPUBLIC / INSTITUTIONSPUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS / UTILITIESRIGHT OF WAY/ROADS/HIGHWAYSEDUCATIONALHEAVY COMMERCIALLIGHT COMMERCIALHEAVY INDUSTRIALLIGHT INDUSTRIALMINING

UNKNOWN

RECREATION / OPEN SPACEAGRICULTURALNATURALWATER

NOT CLASSIFIED

BOUNDARY LINESCOUNTY BOUNDARYJURISDICTION BOUNDARYTAMPA SERVICE AREAURBAN SERVICE AREAPLAN AMENDMENT AREA

W GILCHRIST ST

S JAC

KSON

ST

CORONET ST


S MOR

GAN

ST

MICH

IGAN

AVE

E BAKER ST

E LAURA ST

E ALABAMA ST

S LAK

E ST

E OHIO ST

E REYNOLDS ST

S EVE

RS ST

ALLE

N ST

S GOR

DON

ST

S COLLINS ST

E RENFRO ST

E WARREN ST

JENKINS ST

S WAR

NELL

ST

WATE

R ST

N COLLINS ST

S JOH

NSON

ST

CORONET ST

E HERRING ST

S WHEELER ST

W BALL ST

SPRING ST

E CHURCH ST

N KN

IGHT

ST

SPRUCE ST LOUISIANA ST

MICH

IGAN

AVE

N ME

RRIN

ST

TENNESSEE ST

N GO

RDON

ST

HITC

HCOC

K ST

E MAHONEY ST

S FOR

EST S

T

LAMP

KIN

ST

SAPP ST

W RENFRO ST

DRANE ST SE

S KNI

GHT S

T

LINCO

LN ST

ASH AVE

E MADISON ST

S JACKSON ST

W REYNOLDS ST

FAISO

N ST

MAGUIRE ST

S PALMER ST

E J ARDEN MAYS BLVD

E OHIO ST

E WARREN ST

N PE

NNSY

LVAN

IA A

VE


PROJECT:g:/gisroot/projects/cathy/arcmap/pcpa/pcpa1101f_existing.mxd

FUTURE LAND USE: Hillsborough County City/County Planning Commission.


DATA SOURCES: Basemap, roads, water (1985 aerials, as updated) from Hillsborough County Engineering Services. Parcel lines and data from Hillsborough County Property Appraiser. Wetlands from SWFWMD, REPRODUCTION: This sheet may not be reproduced in part or full for sale to anyone without specific approval of the Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission.

ACCURACY: It is intended that the accuracy of the base map comply with U.S. national map accuracy standards. However, such accuracy is not guaranteed by the Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission.

0 300 600 900 1,200150Feet

µ

PLANT CITYADOPTED 2025 FUTURE LAND USE

EFFECTIVE: DECEMBER 14, 2010

PC/CPA 11-01

ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREASWETLANDS

COUNTY BOUNDARY


BOUNDARY LINES

PLAN AMENDMENT AREA

PLANT CITY FLUE

RESIDENTIAL - 12 (12 DU/ACRE, FAR.35)


MIXED USE-RESIDENTIAL/COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL (1000 ACRE MINIMUM) MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM PERCENTAGE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE FOLLOWING USES: RESIDENTIAL: 10% MINIMUM AND 50% MAXIMUM COMMERCIAL: 5% MINIMUM AND 35% MAXIMUM LIGHT INDUSTRIAL: 45% MINIMUM AND 85% MAXIMUM MAXIMUM INTENSITY AND DENSITY REQUIREMENTS FOR THE FOLLOWING USES: RESIDENTIAL: 12 DU/GA COMMERCIAL: FAR.35 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL: FAR.50

MIXED USE-RESIDENTIAL/COMMERCIAL (20 ACRE MINIMUM) MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM PERCENTAGE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE FOLLOWING USES: RESIDENTIAL: 65% MINIMUM AND 85% MAXIMUM COMMERCIAL: 15% MINIMUM AND 35% MAXIMUM MAXIMUM INTENSITY AND DENSITY REQUIREMENTS FOR THE FOLLOWING USES: RESIDENTIAL: 12 DU/GA COMMERCIAL: FAR.35

LIGHT COMMERCIAL/OFFICE (10 DU/ACRE, FAR.35)


MIXED USE - GATEWAY (16 DU/ACRE, FAR.35) REQUIRES A MINUMUM OF TWO TYPES OF USES,NO SINGLE USE CAN EXCEED 80% OF THE TOTAL DEVELOPMENT

RESIDENTIAL - 4 (4 DU/ACRE)


COMMERCIAL (16 DU/ACRE, FAR.35)

DOWNTOWN CORE

INDUSTRIAL (FAR.50)

PUBLIC/SEMI PUBLIC

PARKS, RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE

NATURAL PRESERVATION

WATER

TRANSITIONAL AREA (DUE TO ANNEXATION)

S JAC

KSON

ST

CORONET ST

SPRING ST

N PE

NNSY

LVAN

IA A

VE

E WARREN ST

E OHIO ST

E J ARDEN MAYS BLVD

S PALMER ST

MAGUIRE ST

FAISO

N ST

W REYNOLDS ST

S JACKSON ST

E MADISON ST

ASH AVE

LINCO

LN ST

S KNI

GHT S

T

DRANE ST SE

W RENFRO ST

SAPP ST

LAMP

KIN

ST

S FOR

EST S

T

E MAHONEY ST

HITC

HCOC

K ST

N GO

RDON

ST

TENNESSEE ST

N ME

RRIN

ST

MICH

IGAN

AVE

SPRUCE ST

N KN

IGHT

ST

E CHURCH ST

SPRING ST

W BALL ST

S WHEELER ST

E HERRING ST

CORONET ST

S JOH

NSON

ST

N COLLINS ST

WATE

R ST

S WAR

NELL

ST

JENKINS ST

E WARREN ST

E RENFRO ST

S COLLINS ST

S GOR

DON

ST

ALLE

N ST

S EVE

RS ST

E REYNOLDS ST

E OHIO ST

S LAK

E ST

E ALABAMA ST

E LAURA ST

E BAKER ST

LOUISIANA ST


S MOR

GAN

ST

MICH

IGAN

AVE


PROJECT:g:/gisroot/projects/cathy/arcmap/pcpa/pcpa11014f_Option3_existing.mxd

COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA (CHHA) DISCLAIMER: Source: Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council,January 2000. The Coastal High Hazard Area, as shown on the Future Land Use Map (FLUE), is a general depiction of the area defined in the most current regional hurricane evacuation study as requiring evacuation during a category one hurricane. More Specific information can be obtained by reviewing the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council's Hurricane Evacuation Map.


DATA SOURCES: Basemap, roads, water (1985 aerials, as updated) from Hillsborough County Engineering Services. Parcel lines and data from Hillsborough County Property Appraiser. Wetlands from SWFWMD, Significant Wildlife Habitat from Planning and Growth Management based on satellite imagery. Only Wetlands greater than 40 acres are depicted.

REPRODUCTION: This sheet may not be reproduced in part or full for sale to anyone without specific approval of the Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission.

ACCURACY: It is intended that the accuracy of the base map comply with U.S. national map accuracy standards. However, such accuracy is not guaranteed by the Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission. This map is for illustrative purposes only for the cities of Tampa, Temple Terrace and Plant City.

LEGENDS: The Future Land Use designations on this legend depict valid land use colors and codes for UNINCORPORATED HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY only. The incorporated area colors do not correspond with the legend. Please contact the Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission for specific Future Land Use maps of the cit ies.

INSET ON COUNTYWIDE: EGMONT KEY is not shown in exact location.

0 310 620 930 1,240155Feet

µ

PLANT CITYADOPTED 2025 FUTURE LAND USE

EFFECTIVE: DECEMBER 14, 2010

PC/CPA 11-01FROM RESIDENTIAL-6 & RESIDENTIAL-12 TO LIGHT COMMERCIAL/OFFICE

PROPOSED

ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREASWETLANDS

COUNTY BOUNDARY


BOUNDARY LINES

PLAN AMENDMENT AREA

PLANT CITY FLUE



MIXED USE-RESIDENTIAL/COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL (1000 ACRE MINIMUM) MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM PERCENTAGE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE FOLLOWING USES: RESIDENTIAL: 10% MINIMUM AND 50% MAXIMUM COMMERCIAL: 5% MINIMUM AND 35% MAXIMUM LIGHT INDUSTRIAL: 45% MINIMUM AND 85% MAXIMUM MAXIMUM INTENSITY AND DENSITY REQUIREMENTS FOR THE FOLLOWING USES: RESIDENTIAL: 12 DU/GA COMMERCIAL: FAR.35 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL: FAR.50

MIXED USE-RESIDENTIAL/COMMERCIAL (20 ACRE MINIMUM) MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM PERCENTAGE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE FOLLOWING USES: RESIDENTIAL: 65% MINIMUM AND 85% MAXIMUM COMMERCIAL: 15% MINIMUM AND 35% MAXIMUM MAXIMUM INTENSITY AND DENSITY REQUIREMENTS FOR THE FOLLOWING USES: RESIDENTIAL: 12 DU/GA COMMERCIAL: FAR.35

LIGHT COMMERCIAL/OFFICE (10 DU/ACRE, FAR.35)


MIXED USE - GATEWAY (16 DU/ACRE, FAR.35) REQUIRES A MINUMUM OF TWO TYPES OF USES,NO SINGLE USE CAN EXCEED 80% OF THE TOTAL DEVELOPMENT

RESIDENTIAL - 4 (4 DU/ACRE)


COMMERCIAL (16 DU/ACRE, FAR.35)

DOWNTOWN CORE

INDUSTRIAL (FAR.50)

PUBLIC/SEMI PUBLIC

PARKS, RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE

NATURAL PRESERVATION

WATER

TRANSITIONAL AREA (DUE TO ANNEXATION)


Attachment B

Reviewing Agency Comments




P.O. Box 1110 Tampa, FL 33601-1110

813/272-5940 FAX 813/272-6258 FAX 813/272-6255

[email protected] www.theplanningcommission.org

MEMORANDUM

TO: Jay Collins, Planner II

Cities Planning Group

FROM: Allison Yeh, Principal Planner

County Wide Planning Group

DATE:

July 1, 2011

RE: Consistency Review for the City of Plant City’s 1st Cycle 2012

Plan Amendment – PC/CPA‐11‐01(Laura Street)

Planning Commission staff has reviewed the proposed plan amendment

PC/CPA‐11‐01(Laura Street) for consistency with the Future of Hillsborough

Comprehensive Plan. This amendment is being processed in the City of Plant

City’s 1st Cycle of 2012. The County Planning Group staff provides the

following comments.

This amendment would change 11.6 acres of land from its current Residential‐

6 and Residential‐12 land use categories to the Light Commercial/Office land

use category which offers a maximum of .35 FAR (floor area ratio )/ 10

DU/GA (gross dwelling units per gross acre). This increases the build‐out

potential from 78 dwelling units to 116 dwelling units per acre which is the

equivalent of 176,853 square feet of non‐residential uses. The applicant feels

that the change in land use category will allow for redevelopment of the area

and allow for the potential to restore light commercial retail uses that were

originally in the Lincoln Park area.

This amendment is located entirely within the municipal boundaries of the

City of Plant City. There does not appear to be any computability issues with

regard to this amendment. The applicable Future of Hillsborough County

Comprehensive Plan policy for proposed PC/CPA‐11‐01(Laura Street) is

listed below for your review.

Hillsborough County

City-County

Planning

Commission

Page 2 of 2


Intergovernmental Coordination Element

Policy 2.1:

Hillsborough County shall continue to cooperate with Temple Terrace, Plant City,

Tampa and adjacent county governments for planning review of selected types of

development proposals within their jurisdiction within one mile of their respective

borders or any development which will impact another jurisdiction. The staff shall

cooperate at the technical and administrative levels to review the relationship of

proposed development to the existing comprehensive plans, address impacts of

development and to achieve compatibility with the comprehensive plans of the

respective jurisdictions in plan amendments, areas of rezoning, land development

regulations, and infrastructure management. Interlocal agreements may be negotiated

to formalize these review procedures.

Thank you for the opportunity to comment and coordinate on this

amendment. If you have any questions regarding these comments or need

further information, please contact me at 273‐3774 ext. 351 or

[email protected].

Plant City Comprehensive Plan Amendment Request

PC/CPA 11-01

Hillsborough County MPO Transportation Analysis

What is the adopted level of service standard for roadway facilities in this area?

Road Name From - To Adopted

LOS StandardAlabama St. SR 39 to Park Rd. D** US 92/Reynolds St. SR 39 to Baker St. D** SR 39/Collins St. Alabama St. to M L King Jr. Blvd. D** SR 39/Collins St. M L King Jr. to Reynolds St. D** M L King Jr. Blvd Alexander St. to SR 39 D** M L King Jr. Blvd. SR 39/Collins St. to S. Warnell St. NA S. Laura St. SR 39/Collins St. to Warnell St. NA What is the current level of service (LOS) for roadway facilities in the area?

Road Name From - To Current

LOS Alabama St. SR 39 to Park Rd. B** US 92/Reynolds St. SR 39 to Baker St. B** SR 39/Collins St. Alabama St. to M L King Jr. D** SR 39/Collins St. M L King Jr. Blvd. to Reynolds St. D** M L King Jr. Blvd Alexander St. to SR 39 C** M L King Jr. Blvd. SR 39/Collins St. to S. Warnell St. NA S. Laura St. SR 39/Collins St. to Warnell St. NA ** Based on the Plant City Roadways Level of Service Report Is there available capacity on the facilities in the area? Direct access to the study area is from M L King Jr. Blvd. or S. Laura St. via Alabama St., US 92/Reynolds St., or SR 39/Collins St. M L King Jr. from SR 39/Collins St. to S. Warnell St. and S. Laura St. are not identified in the Plant City Roadways Level of Service Report.

The Plant City Roadways Level of Service Report indicates that Alabama St. has an allowed Peak Hour Directional Capacity of 414 vehicles. US 92/Reynolds St. has an allowed Peak Hour Directional Capacity of 1,397 vehicles. SR 39/Collins South of M L King Jr. Blvd. has an allowed Peak Hour Directional Capacity of 116 vehicles. SR 39/Collins North of M L King Jr. Blvd. has an allowed Peak Hour Directional Capacity of 154 vehicles. M L King Jr. Blvd. has an allowed Peak Hour Directional Capacity of 259 vehicles. This indicates that additional traffic can be accommodated on these roadways. Are there any Planned improvements in the area? There are no Planned Improvements in this area in the current 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan although M L King Jr. Blvd. from Alexander St. to Wheeler St. is identified in the 2035 Highway Needs Assessment as being widened to a 4 Lane Divided facility. Are there any Programmed improvements in the area? There are no capacity improvements in this area shown in the current 5 year Transportation Improvement Program. What is the impact of the proposed plan amendment? The proposal is to change 11.6± acres from Residential-6 and Residential-12 to Light Commercial/Office: Existing Scenario Maximum Buildout (Residential-6 and Residential-12) 78 Dwelling Units of Single Family Housing (ITE 210)

40 PM Peak Hr Peak Direction Trips

Proposed Scenario Maximum Buildout (Light Commercial/Office) (3 potential scenarios are shown) 116 Dwelling Units of Residential Condo/Townhouse (ITE 231) or


50 Th.Sq.Ft. of Single Tenant Office Bldg (ITE 715) 50 Th.Sq.Ft. of Medical-Dental Office Bldg (ITE 720) 50 Th.Sq.Ft. of Apparel Store (ITE 876) 27 Th.Sq.Ft. of Donut and Sandwich Shop (ITE 936) or


87 Dwelling Units of Single Family Housing (ITE 210 13 Th.Sq.Ft. of Single Tenant Office Bldg (ITE 715) 7 Th.Sq.Ft. of Medical-Dental Office Bldg (ITE 720) 13 Th.Sq.Ft. of Apparel Store (ITE 876) 13 Th.Sq.Ft. of Donut and Sandwich Shop (ITE 936)


Based upon maximum buildout scenarios, the existing land use category could generate up to 40 Peak Hour Peak Direction Trips. The maximum build out scenario under the proposed land use designation could generate up to 402 Peak Hour Peak Direction Trips.

If access is from all of the regulated roadways listed above, the trips generated by either the existing or proposed maximum buildout scenario would not likely cause any of these roadways to operate at a deficient level of service. A more detailed analysis would be needed to determine the impact on each of the roads individually. There is insufficient information to determine the impacts on M L King Jr. Blvd. or S. Laura St.


Transportation Systems Impact Review

Plant City

Comprehensive Plan Amendment Request CPA 11-01 Following please find a review of the above-referenced proposed comprehensive plan amendment with respect to impacts on the transportation system.

Sub-Area Considerations Reviewed By: GT Is the property located in an area where the population is particularly reliant on public and/or non-motorized transportation modes? This area not identified in the MPO’s Demographic Analysis for Environmental Justice Purposes. Is the property located in an area that is affected by any adopted plans, studies or policies relating to the multimodal transportation system, such as community plans or corridor studies? The area for this proposal lies just to the south of the Northeast Plant City Area Master Plan. That Plan recommends a network of proposed greenways and bicycle/pedestrian crossings, those on the boundary of SR 92 could be extended and continued to the existing trail at Samuel Cooper Park. Bikeways and sidewalks are needed along roadways for access to commercial areas, current or future transit routes, schools and other attractors.

Walking & Cycling Network Impacts Reviewed By: GT

What is the current level of service for pedestrian and bicycle travel on roadway facilities in this area? Road Name From – To Pedestrian

LOS Bicycle

LOS MLK E Alexander to SR 39 D D US 92/Reynolds SR 39 to Park D/E D SR 39/Collins Alabama to Reynolds C D Pedestrian LOS is poor on most of the major roadways in the area. The sidewalks that do exist appear to be less than 5’ wide and are often directly adjacent to the street. When transit service is provided, there will be an even greater need to establish a network of sidewalks to access transit stations/stops. Bicycle LOS is inadequate for those cycling on the roadways listed. Alternative routes that do not require a cyclist to divert too far from their trip can be accommodated with route signage and sharrows. More bicycle lanes or shoulders will be needed as more residents move to this area and higher volumes of motor vehicles continue to degrade bicycle level of service. Are there any planned or programmed bicycle and pedestrian improvements in the area? Not in the vicinity of this proposal.

Public Transit Network Impacts Reviewed By: GT What is the current level of service for public transit in this area? This area is not served by HART bus routes at this time. Transit level of service is F. Are there any planned or programmed transit service or facility improvements in the area? The MPO’s current adopted Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) identifies increased transit improvements ranging from frequent local service to basic service and flex routes.


Memorandum

Date: July 21, 2011

To: Jay Collins, Planning Commission

From: Brett Gocka, Plant City City Engineer

Re: May 2011 Cycle CPAs

The City of Plant City Engineering Division has reviewed the potential potable water

and sanitary sewer impacts for the amendments listed below:

Existing Capacity

Water

Permitted Capacity: 7.389 MGD

Existing Available Capacity: 2.512 MGD

Sewer

Permitted Capacity: 10.0 MGD

Existing Available Capacity: 4.3 MGD

Proposed Demand Calculations

PC/CPA 11‐01 (Laura Street)

The maximum build out for this map amendment is 116 dwelling units or 176,853 sq. ft.

non‐residential uses (or a combination thereof).

Using 350 gallons per day (GPD) for residential:

Water Demand = 40,060 GPD

Sewer Demand = 40,060 GPD

Using 15 gallons per 100 sq. ft. non‐residential per day:

Water Demand = 26,528 GPD

Sewer Demand = 26,528 GPD

Conclusion

Maximum total demand of 40,060 GPD for water and sewer can be met by the existing

available capacity of Plant City.


M E M O R A N D U M DATE: July 15, 2011 TO: Jay Collins, Community Planner II

The Planning Commission FROM: Eli Alvarado, Project Manager II

Public Utilities Department SUBJECT: Review of Plan Amendments PC/CPA 11-01 The Public Utilities Department (PUD) has reviewed the Comprehensive Plan Amendments cited above, and has the following comments: 1. The adopted level of service for solid waste in Hillsborough County is 2 years of

permitted landfill space, with 10 years of raw land under the control of the County available.

2. The County currently has 15 - 20 years of permitted landfill space and additional area

available to permit. 3. There is no initial capital investment required to maintain an adequate Level of Service

with the projected impacts from the changes in the Land Use classifications. 4. Any annual operating costs resulting from the projected impacts will be recovered

through the rates established for the Solid Waste Management System. 5. The PUD has an extensive CIP program to maintain and expand its Solid Waste

Management System. Please contact me at 272-5977 extension 43927 should you have any questions.


AGENCY REVIEW COMMENT SHEET

TO: The Planning Commission

FROM: Hillsborough County Public Schools

DATE: 8/11/2011

RE:

PC/CPA 11-01

Area:

Grade Level Total Students

K-5 16Grades 6-8 7

Grades 9-12 8

Total 31

Reviewer:

Hillsborough County Public

Schools

TABLE 1.0: CAPACITY OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED FACILITIES

GRADE

EXISTING SCHOOL

(PROPOSED

SCHOOL)(Building Year)

FISH CAPACITY RESERVEDCURRENT

ENROLLMENT*

AVAILABLE

CAPACITY

ADEQUATE or

INADEQUATE

K-5 Jackson Elementary 594 462 132

0

0

Totals 594 462 132 ADEQUATE

Grades 6-8 Marshall Middle 1149 902 247

0

0


Grades 9-12 Plant City High 2465 2054 411

0

0 0


*2010 40th Day Enrollment Count

Planned capacity in vicinity beyond 2011

GRADEPROPOSED SCHOOL

(LETTER OR REGION)

PROJECTED

CAPACITY

YEAR

CAPACITY

AVAILABLE

SITE Y/N

K-5

Grades 6-8

Grades 9-12

Application

Name:

Number of

proposed dwelling

units:

Plant City

Multi-Family Dwelling Units

0

Single Family Attached

Mobile Home Dwelling Units

0

Single Family Detached

0

116


Raymond O. Shelton School Administrative Center • 901 East Kennedy Blvd. • Tampa, FL 33602-3507

Phone: 813-272-4004 • FAX: 813-272-4002 • School District Main Office: 813-272-4000

P.O. Box 3408 • Tampa, FL 33601-3408 • Website: www.sdhc.k12.fl.us

MEMORANDUM

To: Jay Collins, Community Planner II

From: David Borisenko, AICP

Department Manager, Planning and Facilities Siting

Date: August 11, 2011

Re: Plant City Comprehensive Plan Amendment

PC/CPA 11-01

Hillsborough County Public Schools (HCPS) offers the following comment on the requested

amendment.

PC/CPA 11-01

Amendment 11-01 would convert a 2.5 acre parcel from Residential-6 to Residential-12. Up to 116

single family attached dwelling units could potentially be developed on the site. Based on adopted

Student Generation Rates the amendment could potentially generate 16 students in the kindergarten

through 5th grade level, 7 students at the 6th through 8th grade level, and 8 students at the high school

level. The schools serving the subject area are Jackson Elementary, Marshall Middle, and Plant City

High School. All schools currently have adequate capacity and are projected to have capacity in the

future.

School

FISH

Capacity

Reserved

for

concurrency

Students

generated

by

combined

amendments

2010-11

Projected

Enrollment

2010-11

Available

Capacity

2014-15

Projected

Enrollment

2014-15

Available

Capacity

Jackson

Elementary 594 0 16 462 116 561

17

Marshall

Middle 1149 0 7 902 240 890

252

Plant City High

School 2465 0 8 2054 403 2000

403

School Board

Doretha W. Edgecomb, Chair Candy Olson, Vice Chair April Griffin Carol W. Kurdell Jack R. Lamb, Ed.D. Susan L. Valdes Stacy White, Pharm.D.

Superintendent of Schools MaryEllen Elia

Deputy Superintendents Kenneth R. Otero Daniel J. Valdez

Chief Facilities Officer Cathy L. Valdes


July 13, 2011 Mr. Jay Collins, Community Planner II The Planning Commission 601 E. Kennedy Blvd., 18th floor Tampa, Florida 33602 Subject: City of Plant City, Preliminary Review of Laura Street/Martin Luther King Boulevard Amendment Dear Mr. Collins: Floodplains and Floodprone Areas Thanks for the opportunity to comment on the Laura Street/Martin Luther King Boulevard amendment. This amendment proposes to change 11.6 acres, of partially developed land, to allow for additional residential and light commercial/office uses. The property in question includes large areas within FEMA’s 100-year flood hazard area (see map # 12057C0288H). Consequently, we encourage limited, if any, new development within these areas. In addition, for water quality protection purposes, we encourage the incorporation of low impact development principles into the development area as much as possible. These principles include, but are not limited to, the retention of the maximum amount of existing native vegetation; installation of the appropriate Florida-friendly plants; use of small, recessed areas in landscaping; and, the use of porous pavement and other pervious pavement technologies. Wetlands and Other Surface Waters No comments. Regional Water Supply No comments. If we may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely,

Trisha Neasman, AICP Senior Planner cc: Gregory Horwedel, City of Plant City Cori Cuttler, SWFWMD


1

Jay Collins

From: Campos-Kreutzer, Raoul <[email protected]>Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2011 11:24 AMTo: Jay CollinsCc: Kamermayer, Carolyn; Lyons, JohnSubject: Plant City / Plan Amendments / CPA 11-01Attachments: image001.gif

Public Works Department staffs have reviewed above subject Plant City / Plan Amendments / CPA 11‐ 01, and have no comments or objections. Raoul A. Campos‐Kreutzer General Manager III Public Works Department Hillsborough County BOCC p: 813.307.1912 I f: 813.272.5811 e: [email protected] w: http://www.hillsboroughcounty.org Please note: all correspondence to or from this office is subject to Florida's Public Records laws.


1

Jay Collins

From: GONZALEZ, SHARON <[email protected]>Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 10:52 AMTo: Jay CollinsCc: GONZALEZ, SHARONSubject: FW: Review Plan Amendment PC/CPA 11-01 (Plant City) - Planning Commission

Jay, Per your request for review of amendment PC/CPA 11-01, I have forwarded Colonel Duncan's response for Hillsborough County Sheriff's Office (see email below). Thank you for keeping our office updated on planning commission issues. Sharon Sharon A. Gonzalez Research and Development Hillsborough County Sheriff's Office Fax: 813-242-1836 Office: 813-247-8239 [email protected] Under Florida law, e-mail addresses are public record. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead contact the Hillsborough County Sheriff's Office via telephone at (813) 247-8000 or US Mail at PO Box 3371, Tampa, FL 33601.

From: DUNCAN JR, EDWARD Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 10:22 AM To: GONZALEZ, SHARON Subject: RE: Review Plan Amendment (Plant City) - Planning Commission

No impact on us therefore I see no need for a response. Ed

From: GONZALEZ, SHARON Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 10:07 AM To: DUNCAN JR, EDWARD Cc: BOWDEN, LORELEI; GONZALEZ, SHARON Subject: Review Plan Amendment (Plant City) - Planning Commission

Colonel Duncan, The attached documents support an application for rezoning located within Plant City. It is being sent for information purposes and should you deem that it requires agency comment I am requesting that it be done in writing by July 13, 2011. This will allow me to forward your comments to the Planning Commission prior to their review of amendment PC/CPA 11-01. If no reply is necessary simply email that in response to this notification. The property plan amendment PC/CPA 11-01 is physically located at 302 West Reynolds Street, Plant City, FL 33564. The request is to increase the potential 78 dwelling units to 116 dwelling units or 176,853 sq. ft. non-residential uses (or combination their of) as stated within the attached written statement.

2

If you should have any questions or require more information, please contact me and I will be glad to assist you concerning this matter. Sharon Sharon A. Gonzalez Research and Development Hillsborough County Sheriff's Office Fax: 813-242-1836 Office: 813-247-8239 [email protected] Under Florida law, e-mail addresses are public record. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead contact the Hillsborough County Sheriff's Office via telephone at (813) 247-8000 or US Mail at PO Box 3371, Tampa, FL 33601.

1

Jay Collins

From: Fire Chief <[email protected]>Sent: Monday, June 20, 2011 11:02 AMTo: Jay CollinsCc: Mark HudsonSubject: plan amendment PC/CPA 11-01

Jay Collins, Plant City Fire Rescue has no concerns regarding the requested plan amendment PC/CPA 11‐01. Thank you,

George D. Shiley, EFO, Fire Chief Plant City Fire Rescue 604 E Alexander St Plant City, FL 33563-7164 813-757-9131 Fax 813-757-9133 We welcome your comments about our services. Please let us know at Plant City, FL - Official Website - Fire


1

Jay Collins

From: Ivana Blankenship <[email protected]>Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 2:48 PMTo: Jay CollinsSubject: Plant City CPA 11-01

Hello, Tampa Bay Water has reviewed the Comprehensive Plan Amendment 11‐01 for Plant City. We do not have any comments/objections. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you. Ivana

Ivana K. Blankenship Senior Environmental Planner Tampa Bay Water 2575 Enterprise Road Clearwater, FL 33763 Tel: 727-791-2345 Fax: 727-791-2340 Email: [email protected]


Documents

PCCPA 11-01 report - Plan HillsboroughThis action created a number of legal non‐conforming uses and some of these ... bicycle shops, locksmiths, etc. Small‐scale, limited‐seating