Click here to load reader
Upload
neusa
View
215
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Patterns of species richness for blackflies (Diptera:Simuliidae) in the Nearctic and Neotropical regions
J O H N W . M C C R E A D IE 1 , PE T E R H . A D L E R 2 and N E U S A
H A M A D A 3 1Department of Biological Sciences, University of South Alabama, U.S.A., 2Department of Entomology,
Soils, and Plant Pathology, Clemson University, U.S.A. and 3Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazaonia, Entomologia
Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil
Abstract. 1. Patterns of simuliid species richness were examined over a variety ofscales at 532 stream sites in the Nearctic (394) and Neotropical (138) regions. InNearctic streams, species richness of immature blackflies both within and acrossecoregions and over two seasons was examined. Stream variables at each siteincluded seston, width, depth, velocity, discharge, conductivity, pH, dissolvedoxygen, water temperature, dominant streambed-particle size, canopy cover, andriparian vegetation. These variables were subjected to a principal componentanalysis and derived principal components were related back to richness, usingregression analysis. At the level of the stream reach, richness was not highlycorrelated with single-point measurements of stream conditions.
2. Using data from both Nearctic and Neotropical sites, the effect of regionalrichness on local richness was examined. As regional richness increased, localdiversity reached an asymptote in which further increases in regional richnesswere not matched by increases in local richness. Hence, simuliid communitiesare best described as saturated (type II) communities, consistent with the currentview of lotic communities as non-equilibrium systems.
3. The well-established pattern of greater species richness in tropical regions wasnot observed in this study. To the contrary, blackfly richness is higher in temp-erate streams than in tropical streams at both local and regional scales.
Key words. Nearctic, Neotropical, Simuliidae, species richness, streams.
Introduction
Species richness is defined as the number of species in a
specified area, location, or habitat. Because the total num-
ber of species is rarely known, ecologists qualify richness as
the number of species in a particular taxon or group of taxa
within a circumscribed area. This simple concept has occu-
pied the centre stage of community ecology for decades (e.g.
Begon et al., 1996). Although patterns of species richness
have long been known for groups such as mammals
(Simpson, 1964), birds (Cook, 1969), and trees (Currie &
Paquin, 1987), patterns of aquatic insect species richness are
poorly understood (Vinson & Hawkins, 1998). Most studies
have focused on the influence of single factors on the richness
of temperate streams, with multifactor and broad-scale studies
rarely conducted (Allan, 1995; Vinson & Hawkins, 1998).
Several studies have considered species richness in tropical
streams (e.g. Stout & Vandermeer, 1975; Hamada etal., 2002).
Establishing empirical relationships between aquatic
insects and stream parameters has occupied a central pos-
ition in stream ecology, although many investigations have
been limited by the paucity of species-level descriptions (e.g.
McCafferty et al., 1990; Wiggins, 1990; Stewart & Stark,
2002). Because the taxonomy of North American blackflies
(Diptera: Simuliidae) is well developed, integrating morpho-
taxonomic, cytotaxonomic, and ecological approaches
(Adler et al., 2004), these ubiquitous organisms serve as
model subjects for the study of lotic community structure
(Adler & McCreadie, 1997; McCreadie & Adler, 1998).
Correspondence: John W. McCreadie, Department of Biological
Sciences, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL 36688, U.S.A.
E-mail: [email protected]
Ecological Entomology (2005) 30, 201–209
# 2005 The Royal Entomological Society 201
About 98% and 93% of the 255 North American species of
blackflies are known as larvae and pupae respectively (Adler
et al., 2004). Recent studies also have advanced the taxon-
omy and ecology of Neotropical blackflies (Grillet & Bar-
rera, 1997; Hamada & Adler, 1999; Hamada &
McCreadie, 1999; Hamada & Grillet, 2001; Hamada et al.,
2002; McCreadie et al., 2004). Given their robust taxonomic
status and ubiquitous nature, blackflies are an ideal choice
to examine species richness of stream insects over a spatially
heterogeneous landscape.
In the current study, the patterns of species richness were
examined for immature blackflies from 532 stream reaches (of
which 70 were sampled on two occasions, for a total of 602
collections) over a variety of scales. As shown in other studies
(e.g. Vinson & Hawkins, 1998), different sets of factors should
influence species richness at different scales. First, the associa-
tion between species richness and stream conditions in three
adjacent ecoregions is examined. Next, the patterns of richness
across ecoregions are investigated, followed by the relationship
between regional and local richness, using data from 20 distinct
regions. Finally, species richness between Nearctic and
Neotropical streams is compared.
Although the distinction between local and regional
scales of species richness is unclear for streams (Angermeier
& Winston, 1998), the regional unit can be considered as the
species pool that provides colonists for the local scale (Lake,
2000). Accordingly, each stream (reach) collection was con-
sidered the local scale and the regional species pool was
considered as the sum of all species from local collections
in that region.
Methods
Sampling
All sites in this study were sampled using the same pro-
tocol and scale of stream reach. Sites were chosen based on
accessibility and the presence of flow. Each site was sampled
by hand collecting larvae and pupae from all available
substrates. Rather than a specific amount of collecting
time or a specific length of stream, sampling was geared to
collect a minimum of 30 specimens from each site. Dates of
collections for each region are given in Table 1. This type of
sampling, with a minimum of 30 specimens, has proven
successful in other studies (e.g. McCreadie & Adler, 1998;
Hamada et al., 2002; McCreadie et al., 2004). As in previous
studies of this type (Corkum & Currie, 1987; McCreadie &
Colbo, 1991; McCreadie et al., 2004), it was reasonably
assumed that species found in the sample from each site
were representative of local occurrences. Results for pre-
vious studies have shown that the faunistic lists produced
from hand-sampled larvae (McCreadie & Colbo, 1991) are
the same as those produced using more quantitative and
repeatable sampling units such as artificial substrates
(McCreadie & Colbo, 1992, 1993). When the identity of a
specimen could not be confirmed, the entire collection was
not used. Hence, only collections in which all specimens
were identified were included in any analysis.
Identification
Larvae and pupae were fixed in three changes of acetic
ethanol (1:3) and stored at 4 �C until processing. Larvae and
pupae were identified morphologically (Hamada & Grillet,
2001, Adler et al., 2004). Mid- to late-instar larvae of morph-
ologically similar species and of taxa known or suspected
to contain sibling species (Hamada & Adler, 1999; Adler
et al., 2004) were then prepared for examination of silk-
gland chromosomes, following the procedure of Rothfels
and Dunbar (1953). In other words, when any doubt of
species identity existed using traditional taxonomic
methods, chromosomes were analysed. This standard was
applied to all regions.
To make cytospecific identifications, chromosome-
banding patternswere comparedwith standardmaps available
in the literature (e.g. Rothfels et al., 1978; Hamada & Adler,
1999; Adler et al., 2004) or on file in our laboratories.
Voucher specimens (larvae and pupae) were deposited in
the following institutions: Clemson University Arthropod
Collection, Clemson, South Carolina, U.S.A.; Laboratorio
de Biologia de Vectores (MLBV), Instituto de Zoologia
Tropical, Universidad Central de Venezuela, Caracas,
Venezuela; or Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazonia
(INPA), Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil.
Local richness within and across ecoregions
The aim of this study was to associate habitat conditions
with species richness over two seasons and within and
across ecoregions. Thus, sampling was conducted at two
scales of study. The study area included streams in the
upper two-thirds of South Carolina, U.S.A. (33.25�
�35.20�N, 80.68��83.26�W). Rivers in South Carolina
drain south-eastward from the Appalachian Mountains to
the Atlantic Ocean. Boundaries of the ecoregions were based
on those defined by Myers et al. (1986), Omernik (1995),
and McCreadie and Adler (1998). Thus, the ecoregions
used – Mountains (MT), Piedmont (PD), and Sandhills
(SH) – were established a priori to regression analyses.
Detailed descriptions of these ecoregions can be found in
McCreadie and Adler (1998).
Eighty-seven sites were sampled from February to July in
1992 and 1993, of which 39 were sampled on two occasions
for a total of 126 collections. Collections were designated as
either spring (February to April) or summer (May to July).
Both stream conditions and the blackfly fauna in the
‘spring’ differed from that of the ‘summer’ collections
(McCreadie & Adler, 1998). Collections were made in the
Mountain (n¼ 40), Piedmont (n¼ 47), and Sandhills
(n¼ 39). All sampled streams are believed to be permanent.
The protocol of McCreadie and Colbo (1991, 1992) was
followed for measuring the following stream variables at
202 John W. McCreadie, Peter H. Adler and Neusa Hamada
# 2005 The Royal Entomological Society, Ecological Entomology, 30, 201–209
Table 1. Estimates of local and regional species richness of blackflies in the Nearctic and Neotropical Regions.
GPS Number of Regional Mean local Collecting
Region coordinatesa collections richness richness (�SE) date
Nearctic Region
Alaska, U.S.A. 60.51–65.47�N 40 40 4.10� 0.27 July 1994
141.38–150.78�W
Alberta, Canada 53.00–54.80�N 18 29 3.72� 0.37 June–August 1984
114.40–117.28�W
California, U.S.A. 37.90–39.16�N 29 21 4.03� 0.38 March 1990
122.37–123.08�W
Colorado, U.S.A. 38.81–40.05�N 22 21 3.73� 0.47 August 1997
105.62–106.36�W
Florida, U.S.A. 30.55–30.80�N 17 11 2.53� 0.37 February 1998
84.80–85.95�W
Michigan (Isle Royale), 47.90–48.08�N 12 13 3.67� 0.31 May 1997
U.S.A. 88.54–88.88�W
Nevada, U.S.A. 40.75–41.48�N 20 15 2.55� 0.29 March 1997
117.38–118.05�W
New Jersey, U.S.A. 40.98–41.34�N 16 20 3.06� 0.42 March 1998
74.65–75.77�W
Newfoundland, Canada 44.27–45.00�N 28 24 3.96� 0.27 May–July 1987, 1988
109.46–111.06�W
Saskatchewan, Canada 53.17–54.05�N 24 19 2.54� 0.27 April–September 1989–1994
104.07–105.95�W
South Carolina (Mountains) 34.42–35.20�N 22 16 3.18� 0.25 February–April 1992, 1993
U.S.A.b 81.71–83.26�W
South Carolina (Piedmont), 33.75–35.18�N 16 13 3.19� 0.34 February–April 1992, 1993
U.S.A.b 81.55–82.63�W
South Carolina (Sandhills), 33.25–34.13�N 19 16 4.74� 0.37 February–April 1992, 1993
U.S.A.b 80.68–81.65�W
South Carolina (Mountains), 34.42–35.20�N 18 16 3.28� 0.24 May–July 1992, 1993
U.S.A.c 81.71–83.26�W
South Carolina (Piedmont), 33.75–35.18�N 31 16 3.68� 0.24 May–July 1992, 1993
U.S.A.c 81.55–82.63�W
South Carolina (Sandhills), 33.25–34.13�N 20 11 4.00� 0.23 May–June 1992, 1993
U.S.A.c 80.68–81.65�W
Yellowstone National Park, 44.27–45.00�N 55 31 3.27� 0.29 June–July 1992–1994
U.S.A. 109.46–111.06�W
Yosemite National Park, 37.66–37.93�N 40 36 3.63� 0.25 June 1990
U.S.A. 119.33–119.78�W
Neotropical Region
Boa Vista, Brazil 1.98–2.75�N 12 7 2.92� 0.31 October 1996
60.89–61.73�W
La Gran Sabana, Venezuelad 4.45–5.98�N 17 14 3.88� 0.36 October 1996
60.96–61.75�W
Gran Sabana, Venezuelae 4.45–5.98�N 37 14 3.22� 0.26 February 1998
60.96–61.75�W
Manaus, Brazil 1.78–3.32�S 58 11 2.28� 0.13 March–May 1996
58.17–60.89�W
Pacaraima, Brazil 3.62–4.45�N 16 16 3.06� 0.34 October 1996
61.34–61.20�W
Puerto Ayacucho, 5.06–6.54�N 15 7 2.67� 0.32 October 1996
Venezuela 66.98–67.78�W
aGPS coordinates expressed as degrees and decimals of degrees.bSummer collections (May to July).cSpring collections (February to April).dDry season.eWet season.
Blackfly species richness 203
# 2005 The Royal Entomological Society, Ecological Entomology, 30, 201–209
each site: seston, width, depth, velocity, discharge, conduc-
tivity, pH, dissolved oxygen, water temperature, dominant
streambed-particle size, canopy cover, and riparian vegeta-
tion. These variables are useful predictors of simuliid
distributions among stream reaches (McCreadie & Colbo,
1991; McCreadie & Adler, 1998; Hamada et al., 2002;
McCreadie et al., 2004) and of species richness for lotic
insects (Vinson & Hawkins, 1998).
All statistical tests were performed separately for spring
and summer collections. Stream variables are often highly
inter-correlated (e.g. discharge and width, r¼ 0.893,
P< 0.001). This multicollinearity affects confidence intervals
and significance tests of regression coefficients so that result-
ing models are unreliable (Neter et al., 1990). Principal com-
ponent analysis (PCA) therefore was used to collapse stream
parameters into a smaller number of statistically independent
principal components (PCs) (McCreadie & Adler, 1998;
Quinn & Keough, 2002). The use of PCA allows broader
ecological interpretations of habitat variables (McCreadie &
Adler, 1998; Hamada et al., 2002). Each PC is a linear com-
bination of the original stream variables, with each successive
PC accounting for a smaller percent of the variation in the
original data set. A preliminary examination of the stream
data suggested that a linear description of relationships
among stream variables was reasonable, especially for trans-
formed data. PCs with eigenvalues greater than 1.0 (Norusis,
1985) replaced the original stream variables in all further
analyses. Accordingly, temperature, percent dissolved oxy-
gen, conductivity, depth, width, velocity, discharge, seston,
streambed-particle size, riparian vegetation, and canopy
cover were entered into the PCA. Stream variables that
were not normally distributed were subjected to appropriate
transformations (log10, power, root, inverse negative) before
entering a PCA. Interpretation of each PC was based on rank
correlations between the PC and the original stream variables
(Ludwig & Reynolds, 1988). To provide a rigorous interpre-
tation of PCs, significance for these correlations was set at
P< 0.01 (McCreadie et al., 2004). A PCA was performed for
each combination of season (spring, summer) and ecoregion
(Mountains, Piedmont, Sandhills) for a total of six analyses.
A stepwise multiple regression analysis (ordinary least
squares) was then used to link species richness to stream-
site conditions, with stream conditions now expressed as
PCs. Entrance of each variable (PC) into the model was at
P¼ 0.05. Regressions were calculated for each combination
of season (spring, summer) and ecoregion for a total of six
regression sets.
One-way ANOVA was used to examine the influence of
ecoregion (main effect) on species richness (response vari-
able) for both spring and summer collections. A Tukey
multiple comparison was used to separate means in the
case of a significant analysis of variance (Zar, 1996).
Local vs. regional effects
The relationship between local and regional richness can
be described in two broad patterns (Cornell & Lawton, 1992;
Cornell, 1993). A relationship in which local richness
depends on regional species richness in a simple linear man-
ner is referred to as a type I or unsaturated community. In
contrast, as regional richness increases, local diversity could
reach an asymptote in which further increases in regional
richness are not matched by increases in local richness. This
type of community is referred to as a type II or saturated
community. Hence, local richness would exhibit a curvilinear
relationship with regional richness. Instances in which no
relationship between local and regional richness are found
are also considered type II communities.
Several assumptions and postulations were made for this
analysis which require discussion. First, the distinction
between local and regional scales of species richness is cur-
rently unclear in streams (Angermeier & Winston, 1998).
However, the regional unit harbours the species pool that
provides the colonists at the local scale (Lake, 2000). Each
stream (reach) collection in a particular region therefore was
considered a sample of local richness, with mean richness
among streams the best estimate of local richness. Secondly,
it was assumed that all species used in the analysis were
capable of reaching any stream site within a region (i.e.
species were not precluded from sites as a result of dispersal
abilities). Accordingly, the regional species pool was esti-
mated as the sum of species in all local collections for that
region. The assumption about dispersal is reasonable given
the widespread distribution of the species in the study (Adler
et al., 2004), the distance among sites, and the known dis-
persal abilities of many blackflies (Crosskey, 1990).
Either implicit or explicit is the idea of equal sampling
effort (in terms of area and time) among local collections.
This ideal situation is not possible in most cases, even in
studies that imply equal sampling effort. For example,
many studies estimate local richness from field guides
(Caley & Schluter, 1997). Even a well-studied area such as
North America cannot claim equal sampling across the con-
tinent for any group. This is evident by the large number of
new county, state, provincial, or regional records reported
for a variety of taxa, especially insects. For stream habitats,
the situation is even more difficult. For example, with equal
timed collections among sites, an investigator would be able
to sample more habitat (and thus get more specimens) in a
shallow, slow-moving, 1-m wide stream than in a fast-flow-
ing, silt-bottomed, 30-m wide stream with the dominant
substrate being snags. Furthermore, there is no artificial
substrate that will work equally well among all stream
types for blackflies (Colbo, 1988; Adler et al., 2004).
Given the problem of equal sampling, we elected to base
our estimates of local richness on a mean and regional richness
on the sum of species found in the region’s local streams. Such
estimates are also partially self-correcting for bias due to
unequal sampling effort and the problem of rare species. By
definition, a rare species would occur with a low frequency.
Given that our estimate of local richness is based on a number
of sites, missing a rare species would have little effect on the
calculation of our mean, especially if sample size (i.e. number
of streams sampled) is high. Furthermore, if a rare species was
missed in all collections, the regional richness would be
reduced by one.
204 John W. McCreadie, Peter H. Adler and Neusa Hamada
# 2005 The Royal Entomological Society, Ecological Entomology, 30, 201–209
Fifteen regional collections were made in the Nearctic
Region, with a total of 447 local stream collections from
coast to coast and from Alaska to Florida (Table 1). The
number of local stream samples for the Nearctic regional
collections varied from 12 to 55. Five regions and 155
stream collections were taken in the Neotropics (Brazil
and Venezuela). The number of local stream samples for
Neotropical regional collections varied from 12 to 58.
The relationship between local and regional species rich-
ness was examined using regression analysis. Both simple
linear and curvilinear (second-order polynomial) models
were tested (Caley & Schluter, 1997). Given that local spe-
cies richness will be zero when regional richness is zero,
regression through the origin (i.e. y intercept¼ 0) was
used. Two sets of regressions were calculated. The first set
included Nearctic and Neotropical sites; the second set
included only Nearctic samples. Too few regional collec-
tions were available from the Neotropics (n¼ 5) to perform
a separate analysis for this area.
A standard method for testing whether results were con-
sistent with species saturation in local communities was
applied. A significant simple linear relationship between
local and regional richness was taken as evidence of non-
saturated communities. Alternatively, either a significant
curvilinear (concave down) or non-significant relationship
was taken as support of a saturated community (Cornell &
Lawton, 1992; Cornell, 1993; Caley & Schluter, 1997).
Comparison of Nearctic and Neotropical species richness
Differences in mean local stream richness and mean
regional species richness between Nearctic and Neotropical
streams was examined with a t-test assuming unequal var-
iances. When comparing local richness, each stream was
considered the sampling unit, and when comparing regional
richness, each region was considered the sampling unit.
Results
Of the six regressions calculated for local richness and
stream conditions, only one, from the spring set of collec-
tions in the Sandhills, was significant
(y¼ 4.74þ 0.590PC1þ 0.611PC5, F2,16¼ 11.39, P¼ 0.001,
r2¼ 53.6%). This regression showed a highly significant
positive association with two PCs. Correlation analysis of
PC1 with the original stream variables indicated that high
scores of this PC were associated with large streams with
high pH and conductivity (Table 2). High values of the
second PC indicated streams with lower oxygen than
streams with lower PC values.
Species richness also varied significantly among the three
ecoregions examined in South Carolina during the spring.
The mean number of species during the spring was signifi-
cantly higher (P< 0.05) in the Sandhills than in either the
Piedmont or Mountains (Table 3). In contrast, no signifi-
cant difference was found among ecoregions in the summer.
Regression analysis between local and regional species
richness showed significant polynomial terms (Table 4).
This relationship did not change when either the complete
data set or only the Nearctic data set was considered. This
result was interpreted to mean that blackfly communities
are saturated. Support for this interpretation can be found
in the low variation of mean local species richness
(2.28–4.74), regardless of regional richness (7–40) (Table 1)
and the scatter plot (Fig. 1) of the relationship between local
and regional richness.
t-test analysis showed that mean local species richness of
larval blackflies was significantly higher (t329¼ 5.07,
P< 0.001) in Nearctic streams (n¼ 447) than in Neotropical
streams (n¼ 138). Mean richness (� SE) was 3.53� 0.08
across all Nearctic streams as opposed to 2.85� 0.11 for
all Neotropical streams. Although there was no significant
difference (t6¼ 0.13, P¼ 0.903) in the mean number of local
sites sampled per region for Nearctic (24.8� 2.6) and Neo-
tropical streams (25.8� 7.4), regional species richness also
was significantly higher (t19¼ 3.52, P¼ 0.002) in the
Nearctic (20.44� 2.0) than in the Neotropics (11.50� 1.6).
Discussion
The current study is the most taxonomically detailed and
geographically encompassing analysis of simuliid species
richness, with 532 stream sites in two zoogeographic
regions. Because factors influencing species richness are
scale dependent (e.g. Vinson & Hawkins, 1998), scales
from stream reach to zoogeographic region were examined.
At the scale of the reach (and habitat), numerous factors are
associated with species richness, including substrate hetero-
geneity (Cowie, 1985), water chemistry (Townsend et al.,
1983; Jenkins et al., 1984; Erman & Erman, 1995), water
temperature (Ward & Dufford, 1979; Ward, 1986), stream
flow and size (Jenkins et al., 1984; Erman & Erman, 1995;
Malmqvist & Eriksson, 1995; Tate & Heiny, 1995), disturb-
ance (Erman & Erman, 1995; Palmer et al., 1995), and
altitude (Tate & Heiny, 1995). Biotic interactions seem to
have little influence on species richness (Townsend, 1989;
Vinson & Hawkins, 1998), although models of lotic commun-
ity structure have been advanced that, under specific condi-
tions, suggest biotic interactionsare important (e.g.Minshall&
Petersen, 1985). A variety of factors (size, temperature,
velocity, streambed, and riparian vegetation), acting in
concert, influences blackfly richness in Amazonas (Hamada
et al., 2002).
Of the six data sets from three ecoregions in South
Carolina, only the spring collection in the Sandhills yielded
a significant relationship between site conditions and rich-
ness. Combined regression and PCA analyses suggested
that species richness was highest in larger streams with
higher pH and conductivity and lower dissolved oxygen.
Had the traditional approach been taken, limiting the
study to a restricted geographic area and one season, the
interpretation of results would have depended on where and
when sampling occurred. If sampling only occurred in the
Blackfly species richness 205
# 2005 The Royal Entomological Society, Ecological Entomology, 30, 201–209
Sandhills during the spring, for example, it would have
concluded that blackfly species richness at the scale of
the basin was highly predictable. Conversely, if all three
ecoregions (Mountains, Piedmont, and Sandhills) had
been sampled during the summer, the conclusions would
have been the opposite. It is not being suggested that season
influenced local species richness, but rather that the ability
to predict local richness, based on stream conditions, varied
across seasons. It is suspected that conclusions reached in
many previous studies of lotic insect richness would be
considerably different if the studies had extended over a
wider range of habitat conditions. Resh and Rosenberg
(1989) have stressed the need to conduct lotic studies over
a variety of temporal and spatial scales.
The lack of significance for five of the six regressions can
be reconciled with an interpretation of streams existing as
non-equilibrium systems. The traditional paradigm of com-
munity structure has been one of the systems in equilibrium,
with biotic interactions acting as the primary determinants
of species diversity (Begon et al., 1996) and the importance
of disturbance or other environmental fluctuations being
minimal. However, lotic ecosystems are viewed as disturbed
systems, with equilibrium conditions rarely being estab-
lished (e.g. Reice, 1994). McCreadie et al. (1997) provide
strong evidence for non-equilibrium communities of black-
flies in small streams (� 2 m wide) in Yellowstone National
Park, U.S.A. The first impact is to remove organisms,
creating opportunities for new individuals to colonise
(Reice, 1994). After a disturbance, local species richness
returns to pre-disturbance levels over a period of time
(Lake, 2000). Hence, the number of species at a local site
might depend on where on the recovery curve the sample is
taken.
In this study, mean species richness was highest in the
Sandhills ecoregion. However, the total number of species
in this region during the spring was lower (11 species) than
in either the Piedmont ecoregion (16 species) or the Moun-
tain ecoregion (16 species). The Sandhills in the spring was
the only data set in which a significant association occurred
between stream-site conditions and richness, suggesting
that, at least for this area and time, local conditions played
a more important role than regional richness in determining
local species richness.
Some of the potential problems that might have influ-
enced results in previous studies of regional effects on local
diversity were addressed in this study. First, an implicit
assumption in many studies is that members of the same
taxon are responding in the same manner. Caley and
Schluter (1997), for example, assumed that all Lepidoptera
(butterflies) or all Odonata (dragonflies) could be treated as
Table 2. Results of PCA and correlation analysis between stream variables and derived principal components (PCs) for spring collections in
the Sandhills ecoregion of South Carolina.
Stream sites Principal components
Variables Min. Max. Mean (� SE) PC1 PC2 PC3 PC4 PC5
Temperature (�C) 7 15.6 9.9� 0.51 �0.494 0.164 �0.107 �0.197 �0.397
pH 5.6 7 6.9� 0.09 0.732 * �0.150 �0.288 �0.651* 0.049
% Dissolved oxygen 93.8 104.3 99.2� 0.66 0.270 0.338 �0.343 �0.341 �0.650*
Conductivity (mS cm�1, 25�C) 18 51 30.1� 1.84 0.634 * 0.014 0.138 �368 0.384
Depth (m) 0.13 1.73 0.50� 0.08 0.643 * 0.414 �0.343 0.054 �0.082
Velocity (m s�1) 0.17 0.44 0.26� 0.02 0.213 �0.225 �0.812 * 0.130 0.327
Width (m) 0.6 15.0 6.34� 1.01 0.663 * 0.411 0.044 0.177 �0.116
Discharge (m3 s�1) 0.01 3.69 0.87� 0.21 0.678 * 0.519 �0.154 0.263 �0.101
Seston (mg l�1) 2 10 4.7� 0.38 0.451 �0.435 0.184 0.418 �0.192
Streambed-particle sizea mud silt �0.355 0.302 �0.533 �0.017 0.388
Riparian vegetationa open forest �0.416 0.818 * 0.409 �0.003 0.259
Canopy covera open complete �0.384 0.793 * 0.409 �0.030 0.346
% variance explained in PCA
Proportion 25.1 22.2 14.6 10.9 9.9
Cumulative 25.1 47.3 62.0 72.9 82.8
aRanked variables: streambed-particle size 1–6; riparian vegetation 1–3; canopy 1–3; rankings follow those of McCreadie and Colbo (1991).
*P< 0.01.
Table 3. One-way analysis of variance of mean species richness
(response variable) of immature blackflies among three ecoregions
(main effect) in South Carolina.
Ecoregion Mean (� SE)* n F d.f. P
Spring
Mountains 3.18� 0.25a 22 7.97 2, 54 0.001
Piedmont 3.19� 0.34a 16
Sandhills 4.74� 0.37b 19
Summer
Mountains 3.28� 0.25 18 1.73 2, 66 0.185
Piedmont 3.68� 0.24 31
Sandhills 4.00� 0.23 20
*Means with different letters are significantly different at a family
(group) error rate of P< 0.05, based on the Tukey multiple
comparison test.
206 John W. McCreadie, Peter H. Adler and Neusa Hamada
# 2005 The Royal Entomological Society, Ecological Entomology, 30, 201–209
a single unit. A few studies have shown, however, that
factors associated with richness vary among taxa or func-
tional feeding groups (e.g. Hawkins et al., 1982), invalidat-
ing this assumption for lotic systems. This study therefore
was restricted to an ecologically (lotic) and functionally
(mostly filter-feeding) homogeneous group. Establishing
empirical relationships of insect communities could be com-
promised by a paucity of species-level descriptions
(McCreadie & Adler, 1998). But given their taxonomic
status, blackflies are an ideal group for examining biodiver-
sity in lotic systems (Adler & McCreadie, 1997). Finally, the
current study used 12 or more local sites to estimate local
richness for each region. Studies based on single samples of
local richness (e.g. Caley & Schluter, 1997) run the risk of
producing a curvilinear relationship resulting from sample
bias rather than from saturated communities. A single sam-
ple, for example, might not reflect the heterogeneity of
habitats across a region. Because habitat heterogeneity is
believed to promote species richness of lotic insects, a num-
ber of single local samples in a species-poor homogeneous
area, collected from heterogeneous species-rich regions,
could produce curvature that mimics a saturated community.
Most studies conducted to date have suggested that local
species richness increases in a simple linear manner as
regional species richness increases; that is, in most cases,
communities are not saturated (Cornell, 1985, 1993; Caley
& Schluter, 1997). In contradistinction, results of the regres-
sion analyses performed here showed a significant curvilinear
relationship between local and regional species richness
of blackflies. This relationship did not change whether
the complete data set or only samples from Nearctic
streams were used. This result was interpreted to indicate
that simuliid communities are saturated, meaning there is
an upper limit to the number of species in a local simuliid
assemblage. Several recent studies have suggested that
species richness for lotic insects is remarkably constant (e.g.
Death & Winterbourn, 1994) and that local regulation of
species richness is strong (e.g. Downes et al., 2000). Both
findings would be expected to occur in saturated communities
and therefore strongly support the conclusion that simuliid
communities are best described as saturated.
Finally, it is emphasised here that species richness of
blackflies in temperate streams is greater than in tropical
streams at both local and regional scales. This result con-
trasts markedly with the well-known phenomenon of hyper-
richness of terrestrial insects in the Neotropics vs. the
Nearctic Region. Whether the results from blackflies can
be generalised to other aquatic insects must await until the
taxonomy of Neotropical aquatic insects is better under-
stood. However, evidence has been accumulating for some
time that lotic insects richness may not be greater in tropical
habitats (e.g. Illies, 1969; Patrick, 1975).
Acknowledgements
We thank C. R. L. Adler, L. Aquino, R. I. Barbosa,
J. E. Binda, C.E. Beard, D.S. Bidlack, J. Bosco, J.F. Burger,
D.C. Currie, C. Delgado, F.F. Xavier Filho, R.D. Gray,
P.G. Mason, and C. Steiner for providing some collections.
We also thank two anonymous reviewers for helpful
comments. This work was partially funded by a National
Geographic Grant (5731-96) to J.W.M., an NSF grant
(DEB 0075269) to J.W.M. and P.H.A., an NSF grant
(DEB-9629456) to P.H.A., and INPA/PPI 1-3400 and a
CNPq fellowship (201165/93-7) to N.H.
References
Adler, P.H., Currie, D.C. & Wood, D.M. (2004) The Black Flies
(Simuliidae) of North America. Cornell University Press, Ithaca,
New York.
Table 4. Regression analysis (through the origin) of local species richness (Y) on regional richness (X). Both first- and second-order
regressions were calculated.
Data
set
Regression
model
Regression
coefficients t-value P R2
Nearctic and Neotropical Linear 0.158X 11.70 <0.001 85.6%Quadratic 0.306X 14.91 <0.001 96.1%
0.006X2 7.68
Nearctic Linear 0.150X 10.58 <0.001 86.8%Quadratic 0.295X 12.26 <0.001 96.3%
0.005X2 6.43
Regional richness5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0
Mea
n lo
cal r
ich
nes
s
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
Fig. 1. Scattergram of mean local and regional richness for
samples from 20 sites in the Nearctic and Neotropical Regions.
Several sites were sampled on two occasions.
Blackfly species richness 207
# 2005 The Royal Entomological Society, Ecological Entomology, 30, 201–209
Adler, P.H. & McCreadie, J.W. (1997) The hidden ecology of black
flies: sibling species and ecological scale. American Entomologist,
43, 153–161.
Allan, J.D. (1995) Stream Ecology: Structure and Function of
Running Waters. Chapman & Hall, New York.
Angermeier, P.L. & Winston, M.R. (1998) Local vs regional
influences on local diversity in stream fish communities in
Virginia. Ecology, 79, 911–927.
Begon, M., Harper, J.L. & Townsend, C.R. (1996) Ecology:
Individuals, Populations and Communities, 3rd edn. Blackwell
Science, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Caley, M.J. & Schluter, D. (1997) The relationship between local
and regional diversity. Ecology, 78, 70–80.
Colbo, M.H. (1988) Problems in estimating black fly populations
in their aquatic stages. Black Flies: Ecology, Population
Management, and Annotated World List (ed. by K. C. Kim
and R. W. Merritt), pp. 77–89. Pennsylvania State University,
University Park, Pennsylvania.
Cook, R.E. (1969) Variation in species density of North American
birds. Systematic Zoology, 18, 63–84.
Corkum, L.D. & Currie, D.C. (1987) Distributional patterns of
immature Simuliidae (Diptera) in northwestern North America.
Freshwater Biology, 17, 201–221.
Cornell, H.V. (1985) Local and regional richness of cynipine gall
wasps on California oaks. Ecology, 66, 1247–1260.
Cornell, H.V. (1993) Unsaturated patterns in species assemblages:
the role of regional processes in setting local species richness.
Species Diversity in Ecological Communities: Historical and
Geographic Perspectives (ed. by R. E. Ricklefs and D. Schluter),
pp. 243–252. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois.
Cornell, H.V. & Lawton, J.H. (1992) Species interactions, local and
regional processes and limits to the richness of ecological
communities: a theoretical perspective. Journal of Animal
Ecology, 61, 1–12.
Cowie, B. (1985) An analysis of the changes in the invertebrate
community along a southern New Zealand montane stream.
Hydrobiologia, 120, 35–46.
Crosskey, R.W. (1990) The Natural History of Blackflies. John
Wiley and Sons, Chichester.
Currie, D.J. & Paquin, V. (1987) Large-scale biogeographical
patterns of species richness of trees. Nature, 329, 326–327.
Death, R.G. & Winterbourn, M.J. (1994) Environmental stability
and community persistence: a multivariate perspective. Journal
of the North American Benthological Society, 13, 125–139.
Downes, B.J., Lake, P.S., Scheiber, E.S.G. & Glaister, A. (2000)
Habitat structure, key resources, and diversity: the separate
effects of surface roughness and macroalgae on stream
invertebrates. Oecologia, 123, 569–587.
Erman, N.A. & Erman, D.C. (1995) Spring permanence, Trichoptera
species richness and the role of drought. Journal of the Kansas
Entomological Society, 68, 50–64.
Grillet, M.E. & Barrera, R. (1997) Spatial and temporal
abundance, substrate partitioning and species co-occurrence in
a guild of Neotropical blackflies (Diptera: Simuliidae). Hydro-
biologia, 345, 197–208.
Hamada, N. & Adler, P.H. (1999) Cytotaxonomy of four species
in the Simulium perflavum species group (Diptera: Simuliidae)
from Brazilian Amazonia. Systematic Entomology, 24,
273–288.
Hamada, N. & Grillet, M.E. (2001) Black flies (Diptera: Simulidae)
of the Gran Sabana (Venezuela) and Pacaraima Region (Brazil):
distributional data and identification keys for larvae and pupae.
Entomotropica, 16, 29–49.
Hamada, N. & McCreadie, J.W. (1999) Environmental factors
associated with the distribution of Simulium perflavum (Diptera:
Simuliidae) among streams in Brazilian Amazonia.Hydrobiologia,
397, 71–78.
Hamada, N., McCreadie, J.W. & Adler, P.H. (2002) Species
richness and spatial distributions of black flies (Diptera:
Simuliidae) among streams of Central Amazonia, Brazil. Fresh-
water Biology, 47, 31–40.
Hawkins, C.P., Murphy, M.L. & Anderson, N.M. (1982) Effects of
canopy, substrate composition, and gradient on the structure of
macroinvertebrate communities in Cascade Range streams of
Oregon. Ecology, 63, 1840–1856.
Illies, J. (1969) Biogeography and ecology of neotropical freshwater
insects, especially those from running water. Biogeography and
Ecology of South America (ed. by E. J. Fittkau, J. Illies, H. Sioli,
G. H. Schwabe and H. Klinge), pp. 685–708. Junk, The Hague,
Netherlands.
Jenkins, R.A., Wade, K.R. & Pugh, E. (1984) Macroinvertebrate–
habitat relationships in the River Teifi catchment and the
significance to conservation. Freshwater Biology, 14, 23–42.
Lake. P.S. (2000) Disturbance, patchiness, and diversity in streams.
Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 19,
573–592.
Ludwig, J.A. & Reynolds, J.F. (1988) Statistical Ecology: a Primer
on Methods in Computing. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
Malmqvist, B. & Eriksson, A. (1995) Benthic insects in Swedish
lake-outlet streams: patterns in species richness and assemblage
structure. Freshwater Biology, 34, 285–296.
McCafferty, W.P., Stark, B.P. & Provonsha, A.V. (1990) Ephe-
meroptera, Plecoptera, and Odonata. Systematics of the North
American Insects and Arachnids: Status and Needs (ed. by M.
Kosztarab and C. W. Schaefer), pp. 43–58. Virginia Agricultural
Experimental Station Information Series 90-1. Virginia Agri-
cultural Experimental Station, Blacksburg, Virginia, U.S.A.
McCreadie, J.W. & Adler, P.H. (1998) Scale, time, space, and
predictability: species distributions of preimaginal black flies
(Diptera: Simuliidae). Oecologia, 114, 79–92.
McCreadie, J.W., Adler, P.H. & Burger, J.F. (1997) Species
assemblages of larval black flies (Diptera: Simuliidae): random
or predictable? Journal of North American Benthological Society,
16, 760–770.
McCreadie, J.W. & Colbo, M.H. (1991) Spatial distribution
patterns of larval cytotypes of the Simulium venustum/verecun-
dum complex (Diptera: Simuliidae) on the Avalon Peninsula,
Newfoundland: factors associated with occurrence. Canadian
Journal of Zoology, 69, 2651–2659.
McCreadie, J.W. & Colbo, M.H. (1992) Spatial distribution
patterns of larval cytotypes of the Simulium venustum/verecun-
dum complex (Diptera: Simuliidae) on the Avalon Peninsula,
Newfoundland: factors associated with cytotype abundance and
composition. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 70, 1389–1396.
McCreadie, J.W. & Colbo, M.H. (1993) Seasonal succession and
spatial–temporal distribution patterns of six larval cytospecies of
the Simulium venustum/verecundum complex (Diptera: Simuliidae).
Canadian Journal of Zoology, 71, 116–124.
McCreadie, J.W., Hamada, N. & Grillet, E.M. (2004) Spatial–
temporal distribution of preimaginal blackflies in Neotropical
streams. Hydrobiologia, 513, 183–196.
Minshall, G.W. & Petersen, R.C. Jr (1985) Towards a theory of
macroinvertebrate community structure in stream ecosystems.
Archives fur Hydrobiologia, 104, 49–76.
Myers, R.K., Zahner, R. & Jones, S.M. (1986) Forest Habitat
Regions of South Carolina from Landsat Imagery. Forest
208 John W. McCreadie, Peter H. Adler and Neusa Hamada
# 2005 The Royal Entomological Society, Ecological Entomology, 30, 201–209
Research Series No. 42. Clemson University, Clemson, South
Carolina.
Neter, J., Wasserman, W. & Kutner, M.H. (1990) Applied Linear
Statistical Models. Regression, Analysis of Variance and Experi-
mental Design, 3rd edn. Irwin, Homewood, Illinois.
Norusis, M.J. (1985) SPSSX: Advanced Statistics Guide. McGraw-
Hill Books, New York.
Omernik, J.M. (1995) Ecoregions: a spatial framework for
environmental management. Biological Assessment and Criteria:
Tools for Water Resource Planning and Decision Making (ed. by
W. S. Davis and T. P. Simon), pp. 49–62. Lewis Publishers, Boca
Raton, Florida.
Palmer, M.A., Arensburge, P., Silver, B.P., Hakenkamp, C.C. &
Reid, J.W. (1995) Disturbance and the community structure of
stream invertebrates: patch-specific effects and the role of
refugia. Freshwater Biology, 34, 343–356.
Patrick, R. (1975) Stream communities. Ecology and Evolution of
Communities (ed. by M. L. Cody and J. M. Diamond), pp. 445–459.
Belknap, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Quinn, G.P. & Keough, M.J. (2002) Experimental Design and Data
Analysis for Biologists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Reice, S.R. (1994) Nonequilibrium determinants of biological
community structure. American Scientist, 82, 424–435.
Resh, V.H. & Rosenberg, D.M. (1989) Spatial–temporal variability
and the study of aquatic insects. Canadian Entomologist, 121,
941–963.
Rothfels, K. & Dunbar, R.W. (1953) The salivary gland chromo-
somes of the black fly Simulium vittatum Zett. Canadian Journal
of Zoology, 31, 226–241.
Rothfels, K., Feraday, R. & Kaneps, A. (1978) A cytological
description of sibling species of Simulium venustum and S.
verecundum with standard maps for the subgenus Simulium
Davies (Diptera). Canadian Journal of Zoology, 55, 482–507.
Simpson, G.G. (1964) Species density of North American recent
mammals. Systematic Zoology, 13, 57–73.
Stewart, K.W. & Stark, B.P. (2002) Nymphs of North American
Stonefly Genera (Plecoptera). Caddis Press, Columbus, Ohio.
Stout, J. & Vandermeer, J. (1975) Comparison of species richness
for streams inhabiting insects in tropical and mid-latitude
stream. American Naturalist, 109, 263–280.
Tate, C.M. & Heiny, J.S. (1995) The ordination of benthic
invertebrate communities in the South Platte River basin in
relation to environmental factors. Freshwater Biology, 33,
439–454.
Townsend, C.R. (1989) The patch dynamics concept of stream
community ecology. Journal of the North American Benthologi-
cal Society, 8, 36–50.
Townsend, C.R., Hildrew, A.G. & Francis, J. (1983) Community
structure in some southern English streams: the influence of
physicochemical factors. Freshwater Biology, 13, 521–544.
Vinson, M.R. & Hawkins, C.P. (1998) Biodiversity of stream
insects: variation at the local, basin and regional scales. Annual
Review of Entomology, 43, 271–293.
Ward, J.V. (1986) Altitudinal zonation in a Rocky mountain
stream. Archives fur Hydrobiologia Supplement, 74, 133–199.
Ward, J.V. & Dufford, R.G. (1979) Longitudinal and seasonal
distribution of macroinvertebrates and epilithic algae in a
Colorado springbrook–pond system. Archives fur Hydrobiologia,
86, 284–321.
Wiggins, G.B. (1990) Systematics of North American Trichoptera:
present status and future prospect. Systematics of the
North American Insects and Arachnids: Status and Needs (ed.
by M. Kosztarab and C. W. Schaefer), pp. 203–210. Virginia
Agricultural Experimental Station Information Series 90-1.
Virginia Agricultural Experimental Station, Blacksburg,
Virginia.
Zar, J.H. (1996) Biostatistical Analysis, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall,
Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
Accepted 21 June 2004
Blackfly species richness 209
# 2005 The Royal Entomological Society, Ecological Entomology, 30, 201–209