19
Pathfinder Kick-off Meeting Introduction to AECOM & Sustainable Living Research Programme Simon Hartley 1 st March 2011

Pathfinder Kick-off Meeting Introduction to AECOM & Sustainable Living Research Programme Simon Hartley 1 st March 2011

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Pathfinder Kick-off Meeting

Introduction to AECOM & Sustainable Living Research Programme

Simon Hartley

1st March 2011

Content:

• General introduction to AECOM

• AECOM Sustainable Development Group

• Project Team Members

• Research Project Experience

• Overview of AECOM Approach to Sustainable Living

• AECOM’s Project Role & Responsibilities

Introduction to AECOM

• Global provider of professional technical and management support services involved in 6/10 of the world’s largest infrastructure projects

• Market leader in the delivery of: – Building & Civil Engineering– Transportation– Design & Planning– Corporate: Research & Intelligence– Water– Environment– Cost Consultancy & Programme Management– Energy services– Sustainable Development Group.

• Over 51,000 highly capable, professional staff, in 740 offices, spread over 100 countries – with approximately 110 staff based in Cardiff

AECOM SDG / R&I

• R & I comprise approximately 100 specialists with experience of conducting different types of research with variations of emphasis which broadly mirror AECOM service offering e.g. water; energy, etc

• SDG SW & Wales Team comprise 13 staff with expertise in sustainable energy; behaviour change; carbon management; building energy modelling; ventilation; education; policy development; Part L/F Building Regulations; Environmental Management & GIS;

Sustainable Living: Project Team Members

Edyta Redfern Samantha Lanham

Welsh Assembly Government

SWEA

Simon HartleyProject Director

Richard Redfern - Research Director

Programme Design

Action Research Data

Jeremy Hardin

SDGResearch & Intelligence

AECOM Project Team

Mark Morant - Project Manager

Evaluation Framework

Analysis

Steve Tarry

AECOM SDG

• The nature, level, diversity and scale of AECOM projects means we have experience of undertaking practical climate change mitigation & research projects in all sectors. Examples include:

– Domestic Energy• Great British Refurb, Micro CHP trials

– Transport• Freight Best Practice Programme; Safe Routes To Schools

– Food• London Borough Councils Food Strategies

– Water• Domestic water consumption and CSH research;

investigation into rainwater harvesting and SDS

• Domestic Energy

Evaluation of Whole House Assessment

– Welsh Assembly Govt

Research Project Experience

The Research Programme • Phase I: Short term

– Engagement– Identify possible Case Studies– Identify data sources– Set up evaluation processes– Identify Indicators of success (and possibly failure)

• Phase II: Medium term– Data collection– Look at inputs and outputs– Review evaluation approach

• Phase III: Longer term– Interim

• Look at outcomes and impacts• Review research approach

– Final• Look at outcomes and impacts• Address specific research questions

Overview: AECOM Approach to ‘Sustainable Living’

Phase One: to 31 March 2011

• Scoping phase / study

• Establish research objectives and questions– CO2e; approaches to community action; evaluate ‘models’ of

community based interventions, delivery by the programme management team; assess role of POs.

• Systematic research review – What are appropriate / likely projects to be evaluated? Which

groups able and willing to set targets and measure progress?

• Development of scheme typologies and case study options– Projects look at different sectors, 18 projects in different locations,

• Identification of key stakeholders– POs, local authorities, community groups, practitioners, business,

Research Questions in terms of:

• impacts: What levels of GHG emission reductions have been achieved?

• behavioural change contributing to outcomes: What changes in behaviour have been generated, how and why? Are these sustainable?

• community engagement: which project theme generated the greatest level of community engagement and why?

• penetration and sustainability: How does the delivery of impacts of different approaches vary between locations, across socio-economic groups and why?

• evaluating the different ‘models’ of community based project interventions: Which models / approaches are the most efficient in terms of costs/benefits?

• assessing delivery of the pathfinder project programme by POs and management team: What role did PO have in accelerating community projects / what approaches acted as barriers to meaningful dialogue and collaboration?

Overview: AECOM Approach to ‘Sustainable Living’

Phase One: Up to end of March 2011

• Develop process and impact evaluation framework

• Research indicator scoping– What are appropriate indicators?

• Dataset review– Are datasets available to monitor and measure?

• Process evaluation scoping and definition– What is community action? What processes will be analysed

(PO interventions; types of community group structures, etc?

• Theory of change outlines prepared– Develop robust framework to explore the logic behind what

happens in practice reflecting specific nature of initiatives taken

Overview: AECOM Approach to ‘Sustainable Living’

Phase One: Up to end of March 2011

• Pathfinder Officer Preparation

• Develop a matrix for case study identification– Each PO has 3 No. projects; WAG to select projects for detailed

research; all to contribute ideas regarding project selection– Typology of initiatives according to, for example:

• objective; target population; scheme ownership; location

• Develop pro-formas for case study scoping & data collection– All s/holders to participate, will be driven by need of community

project, researchers and additional WAG/LA work-stream

– Precise tools to be developed

• Prepare training materials and undertake initial training– Will provide detailed and focused research training

Monitoring and Recording

• Following initial engagement with Stakeholders– Focus will be on collating basic ‘headline’ data for each potential case study

(within a long list of, say, 120)– This will enable actual case studies to be selected for evaluation

• Criteria to be determined to facilitate the selection of final case studies – Criteria should allow comparisons to be made across candidate case studies– Should aim for a representative cross section of case studies, covering all

relevant sectors and differing approaches to community involvement, project development and delivery

• More detailed data will then to be recorded for selected case studies, to fully define and characterise the case study in advance of the evaluation phase

• The actual basic data to be collated will reflect the nature of the initiative and the criteria used for choosing between candidate case studies:

Overview: AECOM Approach to ‘Sustainable Living’ Phase Two: April 2011

• Primary Data Collection (by Pathfinder Officers):

• Collation of stakeholder communications, contacts and outputs– Descriptions of activities and reflect upon:

• what went well, didn’t go well and why not• what should be done differently next time and other information

• Community engagement records– Categorisation of initiatives:

• provides a focus for data collection• assists when reviewing the transferability of findings about similar

types of interventions

• Case study scoping and delivery records– case studies provide examples of inputs (intervention) /outputs

(initiatives delivered); evaluation will need to record, monitor and evaluate each of these accurately

Overview: AECOM Approach to ‘Sustainable Living’

 Phase Two: April 2011

Theory of Change (prepared in liaison with Pathfinder Officers)

• Draft intervention mapping prepared (one for each type/sector of investment transport, energy, waste and water)

• Process mapping of roles and responsibilities

Ongoing Support to Pathfinder Officers

• Quarterly evaluation/research meetings

• Ad hoc training and support

• Dataset collation

 

Overview: AECOM Approach to ‘Sustainable Living’

Phase Two

Action Learning Group 1, Autumn 2011, 2 in Spring/Summer 2012, and 3 Autumn 2012 (in phase 3)

• Identify scope of meeting

• Identify presentations, working group topics, prepare material / facilitate sessions

• Prepare write up & feed into interim analysis of short term / interim outputs and outcomes including collation of PO outputs

Rationale

ObjectivesFeedback

AppraisalEvaluation

Monitoring

Implementation

Overview: AECOM Approach to ‘Sustainable Living’

Phase Three:

Validate Theories of Change

• Undertake cross-cutting analysis of change

• Test hypotheses generated in Phase 2

• Prepare updated mapping by investment sector

Ex-Post analysis of data

• Develop compendium of research

• Generate GIS based analysis

• Identify short term behavioural changes

 

AECOM: Project Role & Responsibilities

Thank You - Questions

[email protected]