Patella Instability - presentationgrafix.compresentationgrafix.com/_dev/cake/files/archive/pdfs/549.pdf · muscle to knee extension. They demonstrated that the vastus lateralis pulls

Bulletin of the NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases 2007;65(4):280-93280

Minkowits R, Inzerillo C, Sherman O. Patella instability. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2007;65(4):280-93.

Patellofemoral instability is a common cause of knee pain and disability. Patellar instability can be defined in different ways,1 the first as a clinical entity or diag-

nosis of a traumatic dislocation. It can also describe a sign on physical examination, signifying the ability of the patella to be translated out of the trochlear groove of the femur in a passive manner. Furthermore, patellofemoral instability can be a symptom, typically if the knee “gives-way” as a result of the patella slipping out of the trochlear groove. The relationships between the symptoms, injuries, and diseases of the patellofemoral joint are particularly confusing.1,2 Ad-dressing the specifics of anatomy, biomechanics, history, physical examination, and radiographic interpretation can shed important light on the treatment options of acute and recurrent patellar dislocation and subluxations.

Bony Anatomy The patella is the largest sesamoid bone in the body, and resides within the complex of the quadriceps and patellar tendons. The patella assists in coordinating the forces of these tendons. The patella functions both as a lever and a pulley. As a lever, the patella magnifies the force exerted by the quadriceps on knee extension. As a pulley, the patella redirects the quadriceps force as it undergoes normal lateral

tracking during flexion. The lateral trochlear facet, which is normally 1 cm higher than the medial, provides a buttress to lateral patellar subluxation and helps maintain the patella’s centered position in the trochlea (Fig. 1).

Soft Tissue AnatomyPassive stabilizers are present as uniform restraints of abnormal joint motion. In the patellofemoral joint, these structures include the patellar ligament or patellar reti-nacular complexes, which include the patellofemoral and patellotibial ligaments. Warren and Marshall3 published a thorough description of the medial aspect of the knee, bas-ing their description on the dissection of 154 fresh-frozen cadavers. They considered the medial patellofemoral liga-ment (MPFL), along with the superficial medial collateral ligament (MCL), to be part of layer 2, which is an extra-capsular structure. The MPFL is a continuation of the deep retinacular sur-face of the vastus medialis obliques (VMO) muscle fibers. The patellofemoral ligament extends from the superior me-dial border of the patella (approximately at the two o’clock position on a right knee) and attaches firmly to bone just anterior to the MCL, on the medial epicondyle (Fig. 2). Some superficial fibers of the MPFL can be seen to cross over the epicondyle and blend into the soft tissue posterior to the medial epicondyle. The medial epicondyle is the attachment site for the MCL and the MPFL. The size and thickness of the ligament varies considerably among individuals, but it is relatively constant within a given person.4,5

The quadriceps functions as a dynamic stabilizer of the patella, while the MPFL acts as a static checkrein to resist lateral translation of the patella. Conlan and colleagues6

reported that the MPFL contributes an average of 53% of the restraining force against lateral patellar displacement. Desio and associates5 reported that the MPFL contributes 60% (range, 41% to 80%) of the total restraining force against

Patella Instability

Reuven Minkowitz, M.D., Chris Inzerillo, M.D., and Orrin H. Sherman, M.D.

Reuven Minkowitz, M.D., was a Chief Resident in the NYU Hos-pital for Joint Diseases Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York, New York. Chris Inzerillo, M.D., was a Fellow in the Sports Medicine Service, NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, New York. Orrin H. Sherman, M.D., is Associate Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York University School of Medicine, and Chief of the Division of Sports Medicine, NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Medical Center, New York, New York.Correspondence: Orrin Sherman, M.D., Suite 8U, New York University Medical Center, 530 First Avenue, New York, New York 10016.

281Bulletin of the NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases 2007;65(4):280-93

lateral patellar displacement. The patellomeniscal ligament and associated retinacular fibers were also found to be im-portant medial stabilizers, contributing an average of 22% of the total restraining force. The remaining transverse fibers of the medial patellotibial band and ligament were found to be less important restraints to lateral subluxation of the patella. Anatomical studies by Lieb and Berry7 have shown the contributions of the various portions of the quadriceps muscle to knee extension. They demonstrated that the vastus lateralis pulls laterally to the frontal plane of the femur at an angle of 7° to 10°. The vastus medialis is divided into two parts, the vastus medialis longus (with its muscle fibers pull-ing at 15° to 18° medially) and the vastus medialis obliques (with its muscle fibers pulling at a relatively horizontal 50° to 55° medially). The primary function of the VMO muscle is to stabilize the patella against the lateral pull of the vastus lateralis, making the VMO the dynamic stabilizer of the patella.

BiomechanicsStress encountered by the patellofemoral joint can be math-ematically defined as the sum of joint reactive force (JRF) divided over the surface area of force distribution. From 0° to 60°, the surface area of the patella that comes in contact with the femur enlarges as the knee is increasingly flexed. Beyond 60° of flexion, the studies have been inconclusive. With greater patellofemoral joint loads, the contact surface area is larger between the patella and femur. The location of contact for the patella and femur varies with different degrees of flexion and joint load. At 0°, no contact occurs. At early flexion, the distal patella contacts the proximal trochlea. At 90°, the superior aspect of the patella contacts the femur as the patella glides further inferiorly. When flexion is greater than 90°, the contact area returns to the center of the patella; and when the knee is fully flexed, the inner border of the

medial femoral condyle is in contact with the small vertical ridge of the medial facet.8

Lateral tracking of the patella leads to decreased efficiency of the quadriceps extensor mechanism and increased patel-lofemoral joint stress. A lateral patellar subluxation of only a few millimeters results in decreased contact surface area between the patellar and trochlear surfaces. Lateral tracking pushes the lateral facet closer to the lateral side of the trochlear groove, thus, creating a greater distance between the medial facet and the medial side of the trochlear groove. The total JRF, distributed over both patellar facets, is now completely transmitted through the lateral patellar facet, increasing lateral facet stress. The result can be pain and chondromalacia. A 2-cm elevation of the tibial tubercle has demonstrated a 50% reduction of the JRF when the knee is flexed to 45°.9

“Q Angle”Both static and dynamic forces tend to displace the patella laterally. Brattström10 first described the “Q angle” (Fig. 3) as an angle formed by the line of pull of the quadriceps mechanism and that of the patellar tendon as they intersect at the center of the patella. Clinically, this angle is represented by the intersection of a line drawn from the anterosuperior iliac spine to the center of the patella, with a second line drawn from the center of the tibial tuberosity to the center of the patella. For this measurement to be accurate, the patella must be centered on the trochlea. In males, the Q angle, normally, is about 8° to 10°; in females, the normal angle is 15°, plus or minus 5°. This valgus angle gives a lateral force vector to the patellofemoral joint as the knee is extended. The factors that can increase this Q angle are genu valgum, increased femoral anteversion, external tibial torsion, or a laterally positioned tibial tuberosity. The Q angle also can be increased in a dynamic mode by internally rotating the

Figure 1 Lateral tilt of the patella on an axial view being buttressed by the lateral trochlea.

Figure 2 Image of the medial patellofemoral ligament (black oval) femoral attachment. (From Nomura E. Classification of lesions of the medial patello-femoral ligament in patellar dislocation. Int Orthop (SICOT). 1999;23:262. Copyright © 1999 Springer-Verlag, with permission of Springer Science).


femur on a fixed tibia, as in a “cutting” maneuver. Any of these factors that increase the Q angle can be a contributing element in recurrent patellar instability.

Acute Patella Dislocation EpidemiologyNietosvaara and coworkers11 studied the annual incidence of acute patellar dislocations in Finnish children younger than 16 years of age. The investigators found an annual incidence of 43 per 100,000 children. Over a 2-year period, a total of 72 children demonstrated patellar dislocations. Of these, 28 (39%) of the knees had associated osteochondral fractures. Of the 28 osteochondral fractures, 15 had capsu-lar avulsions of the medial patellar margin, and a different 15 had intra-articular fragments from the patella or lateral femoral condyle. The true incidence of acute patellar dislocation in the adult is difficult to discern from the literature. This is primarily due to the lack of population-based prospective studies and a prevalence of retrospective evaluations and case series.12 The largest North American study to date is that by Atkin and colleagues in 2000.13 They prospectively studied a group of Kaiser Permanente patients from the greater San Diego area of Southern California. The average plan enrollment included more than 360,000 patients, with approximately 1000 of these patients referred each year for evaluation of knee injury. During the three-year study period, 74 patients from this group were diagnosed with primary patellar dislo-cation. Broken down by age, at 31 per 100,000, the highest annual risk was noted for patients in the second decade. The average annual risk dropped to 11 per 100,000 in the third decade and dropped still further for patients between

30 and 59 years of age to 1.5 to 2.0 per 100,000. This study did find that differences in the prevalence of injury based on gender showed a higher average annual risk for females in the second decade, but a higher risk for males in the third decade.

MechanismTwo mechanisms of acute lateral patellar dislocations have been proposed.14 An indirect injury and a direct blow. The indirect mechanism is more common and involves the com-bination of a strong quadriceps contraction, a flexed and valgus knee position, and an internally rotated femur on an externally rotated tibia. An example of this mechanism is a baseball batter’s hind leg when he misses while swinging for a pitched ball. Patients with dislocations frequently have one or more predisposing risk factors (mentioned below). Medial dislocation and subluxation are much less common, usually iatrogenic, and are beyond the scope of this review.

Pathology (Figs. 4 and 5)Acute lateral patellar dislocation has been associated with medial retinacular injury. As described in an article by Elias and White,15 Marangi and associates reported on a consecu-tive series of 74 cases of acute lateral patellar dislocation using MRI. Evidence of medial retinacular injury was seen in 75% (56) of patients. In 44% of knees, complete retinacular disruption was noted near the patellar attachment. Burks and coworkers16 reported a simulation of patellar dislocation using a cadaveric model. They compared MRI and gross anatomic findings in 10 fresh-frozen cadaveric knees. After MRI imaging, they dissected the medial struc-tures to determine where the ligamentous injury occurred. The MPFL was injured in eight out of the 10 knees. Although the location can vary, the most frequent site found was the femoral attachment of the MPFL. In 2003, Nomura17 studied 39 consecutive knees with initial lateral patellar dislocation. Articular cartilage injuries were examined using arthroscopy or macroscopic obser-vation. Thirty-seven knees (95%) had articular cartilage injuries of the patellofemoral joint and two knees (5%) had no cartilage injury. In all 37 knees (95%), articular cartilage injuries were observed in the patella, showing that articular cartilage injuries, especially of the patella, seem to be com-mon occurrences after acute patellar dislocation.

Physical ExamAcute dislocation of the patella in the adult requires dis-ruption of the medial patellar restraints. Swelling associ-ated with the acute injury is often rapid, and a significant hemarthrosis frequently develops, especially if there is an associated osteochondral fracture. This swelling may mask a persistent lateral subluxation of the patella within the trochlea and may be noted on physical examination. As well, loose chondral or bony fragments may be palpable in the joint, and attached osteochondral fragments may be felt in

Figure 3 Q angle. (From Insall J, Falvo KA, Wise DW. Chondro-malacia patellae. A prospective study. J Bone J Surg Am. 1976;58:1, with permission)


the medial parapatellar retinaculum. A thorough palpation of the knee should be performed to detect focal areas of maximum tenderness that suggest soft tissue injury. The examiner may find a palpable defect at the medial patellar margin, tenderness along the course of the MPFL and the other medial retinacular ligaments, or tenderness near the medial femoral epicondyle at the MPFL insertion site. Tenderness at the medial femoral condyle may suggest an injury to the MCL of the knee. If significant disruption of the VMO insertion has occurred, there may be a palpable defect at its distal insertion, as well as a visible change in its symmetry. A positive apprehension test at 30° of flexion is the classically described examination finding (Fig. 6). With or without apprehension, the physician may be able to demonstrate increased medial retinacular laxity that is not symmetrical with the contralateral knee.12

Management Acute dislocations of the patella usually are managed by closed methods.18 The patella is almost always dislocated laterally; extension of the flexed knee with pressure applied to the lateral margin of the patella results in reduction. After an acute dislocation, the knee is immobilized in a commer-cial immobilizer with a Jones-type compressive dressing, and crutches are used for ambulation. If a large hemarthrosis is present, causing significant pain and tightness, aspiration under sterile conditions is indicated before the extremity is immobilized.

Early short arc (0° to 45°) range of motion is begun in order to prevent arthrofibrosis and to promote the formation of strong collagen along the lines of stress. Roentgeno-grams (Fig. 5) should be carefully evaluated to be certain that no osteochondral fragments are displaced within the joint. The patient should be warned of the possibility of future episodes of recurrent patellar subluxation or disloca-tion.

Rehabilitation Quadriceps setting exercises and three sets of 15 to 20 straight leg raises are done four or five times a day during the acute period. Ice is applied for 20 minutes every 2 to 3 hours to reduce swelling. The knee immobilizer and compressive wrap are discontinued approximately 2 to 3 weeks after the acute reaction has resolved. The crutches are discontinued when the patient is able to do straight leg raises with a 5-lb ankle weight and is able to walk with a near normal gait. Rehabilitation should emphasize closed chain exercises, including wall sets, in which the patient squats to approxi-mately 40° while keeping his back flat against the wall for 15 to 20 seconds, for a total of 10 to 15 repetitions. Side and forward step-up exercises using a 6 to 8 inch platform should be performed after the acute inflammatory reaction has resolved. These are followed by short arc leg presses and endurance-type strengthening using a stationary bike and StairMaster® or similar stepping machine. The patient can return to sports activity when quadriceps and hamstring muscle strength is normal and sport-specific agility has been regained. Generally, a patellar stabilizing brace is prescribed for the first 2 or 3 months after return to athletic activities.19

McConnell taping techniques or patellar stabilizing braces have both been commonly used during rehabilitation and when the athlete first returns to sports participation.13 Although these techniques and braces may serve a protec-tive or proprioceptive function, no outcome studies in the

Figure 5 Patellar dislocation. A, Anteroposterior view. B, Sunrise view.

BA

Figure 4 Axial gradient-echo image (TR/TE, 450/10, Flip angle 30°) of complete retinacular disruption near the patellar insertion (white arrow). (From Arendt EA. Current concepts of lateral patella dislocation. Clin Sports Med. 2002;21(3):509. Copyright © 2002, WB Saunders, with permission from Elsevier.)


literature prove that they reduce the rate of redislocation.20

Nonoperative OutcomesRedislocation or recurrent subluxation rates after nonoperative treatment have been reported to be as high as 48%.21 Cofield and Bryan22 reported that in patients considered athletes, at an average of 5 years after injury, 52% remained unable to return to vigorous sports. Even in more recent literature, there is significant variability among both patient population and treatment methods. Garth and Pomphrey19 reported on an aggressive, modern rehabilitation protocol in 58 athletically active patients. They began a functional rehabilitation pro-gram without antecedent immobilization. At the initial visit, patients were instructed in isometric and isotonic quadriceps strengthening and active and active-assisted range of motion exercises with a stationary bicycle were begun. Patients wore a lateral buttressing knee sleeve, initially for ambulation, until muscle strength was documented to be at least 80% that of the opposite extremity. They reported a return to full activ-ity, with resolution of all significant tenderness, and a return of full isotonic quadriceps strength after, generally, 3 to 8 weeks. Sixty-eight percent of the patients who were treated after acute patellar dislocation without previous symptoms had good or excellent results, with 30% experiencing impair-ment in athletics. In 2000, Atkin and colleagues13 studied the early recovery phase (at 6 months); almost 60% of patients continued to have limitations with strenuous activities. These results show that, unfortunately, a large percentage of patients are left with recurring problems of patellofemoral pain and instability.

Operative TreatmentOperative indications for treatment of an initial dislocation of the patella in the adult continue to be controversial.23 In the current literature, the most commonly cited indications for operative treatment in the adult without predisposing malalignment include the following: patients with evidence of osteochondral loose bodies, patients with large palpable defects in the VMO insertion, those with obvious tears of the medial peripatellar retinaculum, and those with persistent asymmetrical subluxation. Elite athletes and, more recently, patients thought to have an avulsion of the MPFL are also operative candidates.24 Use of a realignment procedure assumes that there was an underlying, predisposing ma-lalignment (discussed below). Lateral release is performed if there is an associated tilt. Repair and reconstruction are appropriate if there is an identifiable soft tissue injury. Ar-throscopy is usually adequate for a thorough diagnosis and for treating osteochondral injuries and may be used alone or in combination with other procedures. Generally, surgical repair of acute patellar dislocation is best performed within 2 to 3 weeks of injury in order to avoid operating through early scar tissue formation. A diagnostic arthroscopy is utilized to inspect the joint for evidence of soft tissue or capsular injury and to repair or remove osteo-

chondral or chondral loose bodies. The MPFL is external to the synovial layer and, usually, is not visible directly by arthroscopy. Repair of MPFL avulsions or VMO insertional tears is performed through a 4-cm to 6-cm incision just an-terior to the medial femoral epicondyle, at the distal edge of the VMO muscle belly. The MPFL is identified confluent with the deep fascia of the VMO and can be demonstrated, usually, to have a direct connection to the superior medial border of the patella. In most of these cases, the MPFL can be found to have avulsed off the femur and may be repaired directly by adhering to bone with suture anchors. Complete intrasubstance tears are repaired with permanent suture. Overlying retinacular tears are then repaired with absorbable suture. If the retinaculum and capsule are disrupted near the patella, this is usually clear from the examination and MRI, and repair is performed through a medial parapatellar incision. In patients without a substantial MPFL, repair can be supplemented with a hamstring graft from the patella to the femoral attachment site of the MPFL. The retinaculum and VMO are also slightly imbricated in the repair. Postoperative treatment consists of progressive weight-bearing as tolerated in a postoperative brace, followed by early range of motion and quadriceps strengthening exer-cises. Regaining flexion can be difficult, even if range of motion is started early. Occasionally, manipulation under anesthesia is required. The athlete is allowed to return to sport-specific training when he or she has regained full, nontender functional range of motion and demonstrates mus-cular strength equal to 80% to 90% that of the contralateral limb. Return to play follows a demonstration of adequate recovery during functional testing.12,14

Operative OutcomesIn recent reports of operative treatment, rates of recurrence have ranged from 0% to 17%.23-28 At first glance, these results appear superior to those attained with nonoperative treatment, but few randomized, truly prospective studies have been done. Follow-up is generally limited, the numbers of patients are small, and the operative methods as well as results are varied. Vainionpaa and colleagues26 reported the results of open repair in 55 patients followed prospectively after their first patellar dislocation. At 2 years, subjective results were good or excellent in 80%, with a redislocation rate of 9%. Sallay and associates27 reported on 16 patients and found 94% to have had the MPFL avulsed from the femur. Suture repair was performed and, with an average 3-year follow-up, no recurrences were seen; 58% of patients returned to their previous sport. Nikku and Nietosvaara,28 in 1997, reported on the results of a prospective randomized trial of nonoperative versus operative treatments in 176 consecutive patients, all of whom had sustained primary patellar dislocation. In the group randomized to operative treatment, patients had individually adjusted procedures that consisted of a mixture of medial


retinacular repair or duplication, adductor magnus tenodesis, and lateral release. In this report of 2-year results, recurrent instability episodes were equivalent, and both function and subjective results were better in the nonoperative group. The investigators felt surgery gave no additional benefit, and it remains to be seen whether long-term follow-up will change their findings.

SummaryIn summary, the literature suggests that two main groups of patients suffer acute dislocation of the patella, those with and those without significant predisposition. In young athletically active adults without previous history of sublux-ation, who sustain an acute patellar dislocation, the surgeon can focus on addressing specific pathology. It is clear that some patients do well with nonoperative treatment. There is, however, significant enough incidence of occult intra-ar-ticular injury that arthroscopic evaluation should be strongly considered in most patients.2,28,29 In addition, repairing the main medial stabilizer to the patella, the MPFL, may restore patellar stability. Owing to the lack of long-term, prospective study results, however, it continues to be unclear as to whether operative treatment consistently provides significantly improved outcomes, reliably preventing recurrent subluxation or dislocation. Guidelines are as follows: •Since it is not possible to predict who will do well

with nonoperative treatment, operative treatment should be avoided unless there is a displaced articular surface fragment or any acquired lateral displace-ment of the patella that is unreduced.

•Only do an acute release in patients who have a very tight lateral retinaculum associated with imaging evidence of tilt.

•Avoid excessive medial imbrication, which may overload the medial facet and predispose the patient to medial facet arthrosis.

•Tear of the MPFL is not always at the adductor tubercle and is frequently multifocal. Obtain pre-operative MRI image if acute surgery is planned

Recurrent Patellofemoral InstabilityRisk FactorsThe “typical” physical characteristics of the patellar dislo-cator have been characterized as an adolescent female with ligamentous laxity and multiple developmental anomalies, including trochlear dysplasia, patella alta, and rotational and angular bony alignment.14 Trochlea dysplasia and patella alta reduce the containment of the patella within the femoral trochlea at any given angle. This contributes directly to the risk of recurrent patellar dislocation by reducing the relative height of the trochlear buttress to the patella. Dysplasia of the lateral femoral condyle can be a con-tributing factor. Patients with a hypoplastic lateral femoral condyle have lost a bony support that prevents lateral sub-

luxation of the patella from the intercondylar groove. Amis and Dejour30 reported that simulation of a shallow trochlea in cadaver knees dramatically increases mediolateral patellar mobility. Additional factors that may contribute to recurrent dislocation of the patella include a change in orientation of the fibers of the vastus medialis muscle, atrophy of the vastus medialis, hypertrophy of the vastus lateralis, and generalized ligamentous laxity. In 2004, Fithian and coworkers31 prospectively followed 189 patients who had a patella dislocation. They found the risk was highest among females 10 to 17 years of age. Patients presenting with a prior history of instability were more likely to be female and were older (median age, 21 years) than first-time dislocators. Fewer first-time disloca-tors (17%) had episodes of instability during follow-up than patients with a previous history of instability (49%). After adjusting for demographics, patients with a prior history had a seven-fold increase in probability for subsequent instability episodes during follow-up than first time dislocators.

Clinical FeaturesHistoryIn patients with recurrent dislocation or subluxation of the patella, an accurate history is still one of the most important diagnostic tools. Patients who have recurrent dislocation fre-quently report diffuse pain about the knee that is aggravated by going up and down stairs or climbing hills. Usually, the pain is located anterior in the knee and often is described as an aching pain with intermittent episodes of sharp, severe pain. A feeling of insecurity in the knee and occasionally of “giving way” of the knee or the knee “going out” may be present.

Physical ExamPatellar crepitation and swelling of the knee are common. Physical findings include the previously cited factors that contribute to the Q angle. In addition, patellofemoral crepitus may be palpable, and an effusion may be present. Several testing maneuvers are helpful in evaluating patients with re-current patellar dislocation or subluxation. The patellar grind test is done by applying pressure to the patella and manually displacing it medially, laterally, superiorly, and inferiorly in the trochlear groove. This test reproduces anterior knee pain when a patellofemoral pathological condition is present. In the “apprehension test,” (Fig. 6) the examiner holds the relaxed knee in 20° to 30° of flexion and manually subluxes the patella laterally. When the test is positive, the patient suddenly complains of pain and resists any further lateral motion of the patella. The same controlled maneuver is done while slowly flex-ing and extending the patient’s knee. The examiner visually divides the patella into four quadrants and passively moves the patella medially and then laterally, measuring the amount of excursion in the patellar quadrants (Fig. 7). This is done with the knee at 0° and at 20° of flexion. Normally, passive patellar glide is one but not more then two quadrants, both


medially and laterally. Excessive lateral retinacular tightness is indicated by limited medial passive patellar glide and by a negative patellar tilt. The patellar tilt test is done with the knee in extension (Fig. 8). The examiner’s fingers are placed along the medial side of the patella and the thumb on the lateral aspect. Inability to raise the lateral facet to the horizontal plane or slightly past indicates excessive lateral retinacular tightness. Dynamic patellar tracking is evaluated with the examiner standing in front of the seated patient while the patient slowly extends the knee. A positive J sign, lateral subluxation of the patella as the knee approaches full extension, indicates some degree of maltracking. Active patellar tracking also should be examined with the knee in the extended relaxed position. The quadriceps is tightened, and motion of the

patella is examined. Normally, the patella should move more superiorly than laterally (Fig. 9) Tenderness may be palpated at the quadriceps or patel-lar tendon insertion on the patella or at the medial or lateral

Figure 6 “Apprehension test.” (From Walsh WM: Recurrent dislo-cation of the knee in the adult. In: DeLee J III, Drez D IV, Miller MD (eds): DeLee & Drez’s Orthopaedic Sports Medicine: Principles and Practice. (2nd ed). Philadelphia: Saunders, 2003, p. 1715. Copyright © 2003 Saunders, with permission from Elsevier.)

Figure 7 Depiction of two quadrants of lateral translation of the patella. (From Arendt EA. Current concepts of lateral patella dislocation. Clin Sports Med. 2002;21(3):504. Copyright © 2002 WB Saunders, with permission from Elsevier.)

Figure 8 “Patellar tilt test.” In this left knee, the patella can be tilted so that the lateral edge is well anterior to the medial edge. (From Walsh WM: Recurrent dislocation of the knee in the adult. In: DeLee J III, Drez D IV, Miller MD (eds): DeLee & Drez’s Orthopaedic Sports Medicine: Principles and Practice. (2nd ed). Philadelphia: Saunders, 2003, p. 1721. Copyright © 2003 Saunders, with permission from Elsevier.)

Figure 9 A, Knee in flexion. B and C, Positive J sign, or lateral subluxation of the patella as the knee approaches full extension. (From Walsh WM: Recurrent dislocation of the knee in the adult. In: DeLee J III, Drez D IV, Miller MD (eds): DeLee & Drez’s Orthopaedic Sports Medicine: Principles and Practice. (2nd ed). Philadelphia: Saunders, 2003, p. 1718. Copyright © 2003 Saunders, with permission from Elsevier.)


retinaculum; defects in the retinaculum also may be palpable. Tenderness along the medial or lateral facets of the patella may be noted on direct palpation of the facet as the patella is manually subluxed and rotated to expose these articular surfaces. This patellar tenderness may indicate a pathological condition of the articular cartilage. Thigh circumferences, measured proximal to the patella, often show quadriceps atrophy on the involved side. With the patient sitting and the knees flexed 90°, a lateral or superior position of the patella sometimes can be seen. After careful examination of the uninvolved and injured knees, other joints should be examined for hyperlaxity. Hyperextension of the knees or elbows past 10°, ability to touch the thumb passively to the forearm, hyperextension of the metacarpophalangeal joint of the index finger, and multidirectional laxity of the shoulder joint all are indicative of generalized ligamentous laxity. Stanitski32 found that patients with generalized liga-mentous laxity did worse than patients without ligamentous laxity.

ImagingRadiographic ExamThe AP roentgenogram is of limited use regarding patello-femoral problems. This view may reveal a bipartite patella, which is a variant of normal. Occasionally, an osteochondral

fracture of the medial patellar edge can be seen. Loose bodies or osteochondral fractures occasionally are present. The lateral view yields more commonly used informa-tion relating to patella alta or excessively low (patella infra or baja) patella. The method of Blumensaat is of historical significance only33 and related the position of the patella to a line projected along the roof of the intercondylar notch. Investigators such as Insall and Salvati have found the Blu-mensaat line to be an inexact index of patella alta. In a review of 114 lateral roentgenograms of normal knees, Insall and colleagues33 found that the length of the patellar tendon (LT) and the diagonal length of the patella (LP) had a ratio of 1.0, with less than 20% variation. They concluded that patella alta is likely to be present if LT exceeds LP by more than 20% (ratio of 1.2 or more) (Fig. 10). The most widely used axial views are those described by Merchant and associates34 and Laurin and coworkers.35 In the Merchant technique, the patellofemoral joint is viewed with knees flexed to 45°. The radiographic tube is positioned above the knee, with the radiographic plate positioned distal to the knee. These investigators origi-nally described the “congruence angle” (Fig. 11) and the technique of measuring the angle. The average congruence angle in 100 normal subjects was found to be 6°, with a standard deviation of 11°. This means that a congruence angle of greater than +16° is abnormal at the 95th percen-tile. Aglietti and colleagues36 are credited with providing a more accurate definition of the congruence angle. Their study found an average congruence angle of 8°, with a

Figure 11 Congruence angle of Merchant. Line BO is the bisec-tor of angle ABC. Line BX passes through the lowest point on the median ridge of the patella. Angle OBX is the congruence angle. If line BX falls to the medial side of line BO, the angle is expressed as negative degrees. If it falls to the lateral side of line BO, it is expressed as positive degrees. (From Walsh WM: Recurrent dislo-cation of the knee in the adult. In: DeLee J III, Drez D IV, Miller MD (eds): DeLee & Drez’s Orthopaedic Sports Medicine: Principles and Practice. (2nd ed). Philadelphia: Saunders, 2003, p. 1727. Copyright © 2003 Saunders, with permission from Elsevier.)

Figure 10 Assessment of patella alta (technique of Insall and Salvati). The ratio of the longest diagonal of the patella to the length of the patellar tendon should be 1.0 ± 20%. (From Walsh WM: Recurrent dislocation of the knee in the adult. In: DeLee J III, Drez D IV, Miller MD (eds): DeLee & Drez’s Orthopaedic Sports Medicine: Principles and Practice. (2nd ed). Philadelphia: Saunders, 2003, p. 1725. Copyright © 2003 Saunders, with per-mission from Elsevier.)


standard deviation of 6°. Laurin and associates35 described a technique in which the knees are flexed to 20° to 30°. The radiographic tube is positioned between the ankles, with the cassette held proximal to the knees by the patient. On this view, these authors defined a “lateral patellofemoral angle” (Fig. 12). They indicated that, normally, this angle is open laterally, whereas in patients with patellar tilt, the lines used to define the angle are parallel or open medially. Teitge and coworkers37 described a radiographic tech-nique that can be a helpful adjunctive test for diagnosing patellar instability. They first obtained bilateral axial radio-graphs of the patellofemoral joints in anatomic position. A constant medial and lateral force was applied to the patella with an instrumented device, and axial radiographs were repeated. They found that a 4 mm increase in medial or lateral patellar excursion, compared with the asymptomatic knee, correlates with patellar instability. These dynamic radiographs are thought to be more reliable than static films.

Computed Tomography Inoue and colleagues38 described a group of patients with minimal subluxation in whom the condition was determined more accurately by using computed tomography (CT) with the knee in full extension. They found that, with the knee extended, the lateral tilt of the patella was more pronounced in patients who had patellar subluxation than in patients of

the normal control groups. The patients with patellar sublux-ation had a lesser degree of abnormality, and the subluxation was not seen with the knee flexed 30° to 45°, as is usual in most routine axial views. Another role for CT is identifying lateralization of the tibial tubercle as measured by the distance between the tibial tubercle and the trochlear sulcus. An axial CT image demonstrating the femoral groove is superimposed on an axial image of the tibial tubercle. A line is drawn on this superimposed image between the posterior margins of the femoral condyles. Two lines are drawn perpendicular to this line, one bisecting the femoral trochlear groove (TG) and the other bisecting the anterior tibial tuberosity (ATT). The distance between these two lines determines the extent of lateralization of the tibial tubercle. Values greater than 9 mm have been shown to identify patients with patellofemoral malalignment with a specificity of 95% and a sensitivity of 85%.39 More recently, Shakespeare and Fick,40 in 2005, tried to measure theses parameters by clinical exam only. They concluded that examination alone is not reliable and that CT is the only accurate way to measure the ATT-TG distance.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)Pathologic entities such as chondromalacia, articular carti-lage injuries and degeneration, synovial plicae, and patel-lar tendinitis can be visualized on MRI. Studies similar to those made with CT scans can easily be accomplished with MRI without exposure to radiation, although they involve considerable expense. Recent interest has been generated in the determination of what MRI can show regarding the acute lesion associated with patellar instability, as mentioned above. Among the first to describe this were Sallay and coworkers.27 They demonstrated how clearly the rupture of the MPFL from the femur could be seen on both sagittal and axial T2-weighted views. Shellock and associates41 described a medial subluxation of the patella that could be demonstrated only by kinematic MRI of the patellofemoral joint done with the knee at 0°, 5°, 10°, 15°, 20°, 25°, and 30° of flexion. Identifying these subluxations is important, because releasing the lateral side of this patella would make the condition worse. MRI can be helpful in determining the site of retinacular or patel-lofemoral ligamentous injury if the physical examination is equivocal and surgical repair is contemplated. One must bear in mind that, although these roentgeno-graphic techniques are important in evaluation of the patel-lofemoral joint, the diagnosis of patellar dislocation or subluxation is made by clinical evaluation and not only by roentgenogram.

Conservative Management Surgery is not needed in all patients with patellofemoral malalignment or recurrent subluxation of the patella. Satis-factory results may be achieved with a conservative exercise treatment program. A rehabilitation program to strengthen

Figure 12 Measurement of lateral patellofemoral angle. Line YY is drawn across the most anterior portions of the femoral trochlea in the axial view of this left knee. Line XX follows the slope of the lateral patellar facet. A, Demonstration of a normal angle in which the angle opens laterally. B, Demonstration of an abnormal angle with the angle open medially. (From Walsh WM: Recurrent disloca-tion of the knee in the adult. In: DeLee J III, Drez D IV, Miller MD (eds): DeLee & Drez’s Orthopaedic Sports Medicine: Principles and Practice. (2nd ed). Philadelphia: Saunders, 2003, p. 1727. Copyright © 2003 Saunders, with permission from Elsevier.)

B

A


the quadriceps muscle and VMO is of primary importance. A program similar to that followed after acute dislocation, with the addition of more resistive exercises, can be started early, and a patellar stabilization brace may help prevent chronic recurrent subluxation. Using kinematic MRI, Muhle and coworkers42 demonstrated no significant effect on patel-lar tracking when bracing was used. It is unknown whether the brace benefits proprioception as above.

Operative Management If clinical improvement with nonoperative treatment has plateaued, operative intervention may be required. Re-peated subluxations or dislocations may cause continued apprehension and progressive joint damage. An abnormal patellofemoral articulation, abnormal quadriceps pull, os-teochondral free fragments, chondromalacia of the patella, meniscal tears, and degeneration all contribute to progressive deterioration of the knee joint. No single operation is universally successful in correcting recurrent patellar dislocation and subluxation. The operation must be chosen insofar as possible with the needs of the individual patient as the foremost consideration. The extent of the malalignment, the patient’s age, the level of activity, and the condition of the joint also are important. Over 100 operations have been described for the treatment of recurrent subluxation or dislocation of the patella. These procedures can generally be divided into categories:

1. Proximal realignment of the extensor mechanism. These procedures alter the medial-lateral position of the patella through manipulation of the soft tissues proximal to its inferior pole. Included in this category are lateral retinacular release, medial plication, vas-tus medialis obliques advancement, and MPFL repair and reconstruction.

2. Distal realignment of the extensor mechanism. These operations modify the positions of the patella by way of transferring the tibial tuberosity or through surgery on the soft tissues distal to the inferior pole. Most commonly, this method involves medial or anteromedial displacement of the tibial tuberosity.

3. Combined proximal and distal realignment.

Proximal Realignment Proximal realignment of the patella is a realignment of the quadriceps muscle to the patella, with or without a lateral release. As emphasized by Insall and colleagues,33 in 1972, and Insall,43 in 1982, the operation is not a capsular procedure but rather a quadricepsplasty. Proximal realignment is indi-cated for patellar instability when the Q angle is the normal range. When the Q angle approaches 20°, additional distal realignment should be considered. Further indications are asymmetrical lateral patellar translation at 30°, significant trochlear dysplasia, normal or mild tubercle malalignment, and absence of severe medial patella arthrosis.2,18,41,44 These procedures may be performed by open or mini imbrication,

as well as arthroscopic medial imbrication. A proximal “tube” realignment of the patella was de-scribed by Insall and associates (Fig. 13). In this technique, the vastus medialis is brought laterally and sutured to the free edge of the vastus lateralis, forming a flattened tube proximal to the patella (Fig. 13). Their results in 53 knees showed 81% excellent or good results and 19% fair or poor.

Figure 13 Insall technique of proximal realignment of the patella. A, Medial and lateral vasti are separated from rectus femoris tendon. B, Lateral release is performed; synovium is left intact. C, Com-pleted closure is tight to hold patella securely in femoral groove. D, Remaining medial flap sutured without further overlap. (From Phillips BB: Recurrent dislocations. In: Canal ST (ed): Campbell’s Operative Orthopaedics. (10th ed). Philadelphia: Mosby, 2003, p, 2384. Copyright © 2003 Elsevier. Sources for illustration. A and C redrawn from Insall JN, Aglietti P, Tria AJ Jr: Patellar pain and in-congruence. II: Clinical application. Clin Orthop 1983;(176):225-32; B, redrawn from Insall JN, Falvo KA, Wise DW: Chondromalacia patellae. A prospective study. J Bone Joint Surg Am.1976;58;1:1-8. Copyright ©1976, The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.; D, redrawn from Insall J, Bullough PG, Burstein AN. Proximal “tube” realignment of the patella for chondromalacia patellae. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1979;(144):63-9. All sources, with permission.)


Halbrecht,45 in 2001, reported his results of arthroscopic all-inside medial reefing and lateral release. Arthroscopic reefing was performed by percutaneous passage of suture, followed by arthroscopic retrieval and knot tying inside the joint. Ninety-three percent had significant subjective im-provement, as well as improvement of the congruence and lateral patellofemoral angle. This procedure is indicated for mild to moderate insufficiency of the MPFL, with a normal Q angle, and without trochlear dysplasia or patella alta.

MPFL ReconstructionSince recognition of the important role of the MPFL, tech-niques have begun to emerge addressing this pathologic process. Hautamaa and colleagues4 believe that proximal realignment should always repair the MPFL and they dem-onstrated the effectiveness of this in restoring balance in cadaver knees. Key points to MPFL reconstruction are that isometry is a critical factor and the MPFL should not be over tensioned. In chronic dislocations, reconstruction of the MPFL is performed rather than repair. Avikainen and coworkers46 presented a technique of augmentation of the MPFL with a strip of adductor magnus tendon. There was one redislocation in 14 patients. Muneta and colleagues47 reconstructed the MPFL with a double strand gracilis tendon in five cases and an iliotibial band allograft in one. Drez and colleagues,48 in 2001, presented a series of 19 patients who underwent reconstruction of the MPFL with a lateral release using autogenous hamstrings or iliotibial band and a minimum 2-year follow-up with an average Q angle of

under 15° (Fig. 14); 87% of patients had good to excellent re-sults. The medial patellotibial ligament was also reconstructed using a portion of the autograft. The investigators admitted that the patellotibial ligament may not contribute significant stability, as evidenced by prior anatomic studies. Addition-ally, although the MPFL reconstruction was performed with a lateral release, they contended, and previous studies support, that lateral release alone would have led to inferior results.

Lateral ReleaseThe treatment of choice for patellar tilt is an arthroscopic release. This procedure has been shown to be most effec-tive in patients with patellar tilt49 (as mentioned above). The lateral release does not substantially reduce the active lateral vector of the quadriceps and, therefore, has less satisfactory results in patients with subluxation. Arendt2 showed that lateral patellar tilt could be a function not only of lateral retinacular tension but also of isolated medial retinacular laxity. Therefore, most investigators2,49 would recommend that a lateral release be used only when there is residual patellar tilt (a physical examination sign) after restoration of the medial retinacular structures or limited medial passive patellar displacement. The arthroscopic release is performed 5 mm lateral to the patellar border, covering the distance from 1 cm superior to the patella to the anterolateral portal. Hemarthrosis, the most common postoperative complication, inhibits the quadriceps and delays rehabilitation. This can be minimized by using electrocautery and deflating the tourniquet before closure.

Distal RealignmentReducing the Q angle by medializing the tibial tubercle insertion has long played a role in patellar realignment sur-gery. One of the more popular current operations is one that involves medial displacement of the anterior tibial tubercle. This operation was originated and performed by Roux50 in 1887. The principles were modified by Elmslie and published by Trillat and associates.51 The intent of the operation was to diminish the Q angle and effectively medialize the extensor mechanism to correct lateral tracking of the patella. Current indications for distal realignment are: •Increased quadriceps angle or ATT-TG distance, •Normal lateral patellar glide (intact MPFL), •Static malalignment of patella with tilt, •Medial facet arthrosis, and •Patella alta. In 1994, Shelbourne and coworkers52 reported 45 patients with a 2-year follow-up using a modified Elmslie-Trillat procedure for refractory patellar instability (34 knees) or painful patellofemoral syndrome with malalignment (11 knees). The postoperative congruence angle (mean, +3.4°) was significantly improved when compared with the preoperative value (mean, +21.5°). The “normal” congruence angle is on average -8°. Even though their results were better than prior Elmslie-Trillat osteotomies,51,53 nine knees (20%) had some

Figure 14 The reconstructed medial patellofemoral ligament and the medial patellotibial ligament. (Reprinted from Drez D Jr, Ed-wards TB, Williams CS. Results of medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction in the treatment of patellar dislocation. Arthroscopy. 2001;17(3):298-306. Copyright © 2001, with permission from the Arthroscopy Association of North America.)


postoperative subluxation. Furthermore, medial tibial tubercle transfer may lead to medial patellofemoral arthrosis.54 To avoid potential loading of the medial patellar facet or to unload potential damage to patellar articular cartilage in recurrent patellar dislocations, some investigators advocate anteriorization of the tibial tubercle and medialization. Ma-quet53 and Bandi55 first introduced elongation of the extensor lever arm by anterior displacement of the tibial tuberosity. This operation has been modified further by Fulkerson and colleagues.56

Anteromedial Tibial Tubercle Transfer (Fulkerson Procedure)This procedure corrects the Q angle with medialization of the tibial tubercle and unloads the patellofemoral articula-tion with anteriorization of the tubercle (Fig. 15). A hinge of bone is maintained intact at the distal tubercle to facili-tate healing. After the transfer, the bone pedicle is locked into position with two cortical screws. Patients are made non-weightbearing for 6 to 8 weeks to avoid tibia fracture. Fulkerson and associates56 reported 93% good and excel-lent results subjectively and 89% good and excellent results objectively.

TrochleoplastyTrochlear dysplasia is identified as a predominant factor in symptomatic patellar dislocation.57 Trochlear dysplasia,

however, is an anomaly that is difficult to correct. A trench type trochleoplasty is technically difficult to perform, and there is concern that there is potential disruption of the cartilage surface or change in contact pressure that may lead to postoperative pain and arthrosis. Clinical outcome seemingly would depend also on the type and shape of the patella, which are factors particularly difficult to simulate and by which to predict an outcome. In 2005, Verdonk and coworkers58 performed a Henri De-jour trochleoplasty on 13 patients complaining of recurrent patellar dislocations or persistent retropatellar pain due to a dysplastic femoral trochlea. In this technique, the femoral trochlea is deepened by removing the subchondral trochlear bone, followed by incision, impaction, and fixation of the cartilage flange along the trochlear groove. They achieved 77% good to very good subjective results. Although the outcome was not perfect, the patients were satisfied with the procedure. The investigators suggested that this technique might be a valuable alternative in cases of frank trochlear dysplasia associated with persistent retropatellar pain or recurrent patellar dislocations.

Combined Proximal and Distal RealignmentIndications for a combined proximal and distal procedure are a combination of tubercle malalignment and traumatic incompetency of the medial restraints. Hughston and Walsh59 reported satisfactory results using a technique for reconstruc-tion of the extensor mechanism that combines many aspects of other procedures. They emphasized the importance of a proximal extensor mechanism reconstruction, including careful placement of the vastus medialis muscle. Distal realignment is indicated for knees in which the Q angle is increased beyond 20° in skeletally mature patients. The surgeon should first correct tubercle malalignment and then reassess patellar tracking, in combination with lateral retinacular release. If patellar tracking is still not corrected and lateral instability is still present, the surgeon should perform medial augmentation or reconstruction of the MPFL. More recently, in 2004, Palmer and colleagues60 reported their results of a lateral release, a VMO advancement, and an anteromedial tibial tubercle transfer to correct all the ab-normalities of patellofemoral maltracking, including patella alta. One hundred seven knees in 84 patients were reviewed, with a mean follow-up of 5.6 years. Seventy-nine percent of patients had a good to excellent functional outcome, and 84% of patients stated they would have the operation again. Two patients with marked generalized ligamentous laxity had recurrent dislocation of the patella.

ConclusionsPatellofemoral instability can be difficult to treat. Surgical treatment of patellar dislocations both acute and chronic have evolved significantly with the advancement of biome-chanical knowledge of patellofemoral restraints and injury patterns identified by physical examination and improved

Figure 15 The direction and extent of the tibial tubercle displace-ment in the Fulkerson anteriomedialization osteotomy. (From Fulkerson JP, Hungerford DS. Surgical treatment of patellofemoral chondrosis and arthrosis. Disorders of the Patellofemoral Joint. (2nd ed). Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1990, p. 237. Copyright © 1990 Williams & Wilkins, with permission Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Wolters Kluwer.)


imaging techniques. For acute dislocations, nonoperative therapy should be a mainstay of treatment. Arthroscopy should be indicated for symptomatic osteochondral injury, with or without me-dial repair and lateral release. In recurrent dislocations or subluxations, nonoperative therapy is still the predominant form of treatment as well. For patients who fail conservative treatment, proximal, distal, and combined realignments can be performed and should be based on the specific dysfunc-tion of each patient.

Disclosure StatementNone of the authors have a financial or proprietary interest in the subject matter or materials discussed, including, but not limited to, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, honoraria, and paid expert testimony.

References1. Grelsamer RP. Patellofemoral semantics. The tower of Babel.

Am J Knee Surg. 1997;10:92-5.2. Arendt EA. Current concepts of lateral patella dislocation.

Clin Sports Med. 2002;21(3):499-519.3. Warren RF, Marshall JL. The supporting structures and lay-

ers on the medial side of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1979;61:56-62.

4. Hautamaa PV, Fithian DC, Pohlmeyer AM, et al. The medial soft tissue restraints in lateral patellar instability and repair. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 1998;(349):174-82.

5. Desio SM, Burks RT, Bachus KN. Soft tissue restraints to lateral patellar translation in the human knee. Am J Sports Med. 1998;26:59-65.

6. Conlan T, Garth WP, Lemons JE. Evaluation of the medial soft-tissue restraints of the extensor mechanism of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;75:682-93.

7. Lieb FJ, Berry J. Quadriceps function. An anatomical and mechanical study using amputated limbs. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1968;50;1535-48.

8. Grelsamer RP, Klein JR. The biomechanics of the patello-femoral joint. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1998 Nov; 28(5):86-98.

9. Heegaard J, Leyvraz PF, Curnier A, et al. Effect of tibial tubercle elevation on patellofemoral compressive force in patellofemoral arthrosis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Ar-throsc. 1997;5(1):31-5.

10. Brattström H. Shape of the intercondylar groove normally and in recurrent dislocation of the patella. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. 1964;68:Suppl 68:1-148.

11. Nietosvaara Y, Aalto K, Kallio PE. Acute patellar dislocation in children: Incidence and associated osteochondral fractures. J Pediatr Orthop. 1994;14(4):513-5.

12. DeLee J, Drez D, Miller MD (eds): DeLee and Drez’s Ortho-paedic Sports Medicine. (2nd ed). Chapter 28. Philadelphia: Saunders, Elsevier, 2003, pp. 1772-1828.

13. Atkin DM, Fithian DC, Maranji KS, et al. Characteristics of patients with primary acute lateral patellar dislocation and their recovery within the first six months of injury. Am J Sports Med. 2000;4:472-9.

14. Boden BP, Pearsall AW, Garrett WE Jr, Feagin JA Jr. Patel-lofemoral instability: Evaluation and management. J Am Acad

Orthop Surg. 1997 Jan;5(1):47-57.15. Elias DA, White LM. Imaging of patellofemoral disorders.

Clin Radiol. 2004 Jul;59(7):543-57.16. Burks RT, Desio SM, Bachus KN, et al. Biomechanical

evaluation of lateral patellar dislocations. Am J Knee Surg. 1997;10:24-31.

17. Nomura E, Inoue M, Kurimura M. Chondral and osteo-chondral injuries associated with acute patellar dislocation. Arthroscopy. 2003 Sep;19(7):717-21.

18. Philips BB. Recurrent dislocations. In: Canale ST, Jones L (eds). Campbell’s Operative Orthopaedics. (10th ed). St. Louis: Mosby, 2003, pp. 2377-2393.

19. Garth WP, Pomphrey M. Functional treatment of patellar dislocation in an athletic population. Am J Sports Med. 1996;24:785-91.

20. Grelsamer RP. The effects of patellar taping on patellofemoral incongruence. A computed tomography study. Am J Sports Med. 2001 Nov-Dec;29(6):829.

21. Cash JD, Hughston JC. Treatment of acute patellar dislocation. Am J Sports Med. 1988;16:244-9.

22. Cofield RH, Bryan RS. Acute dislocation of the patella: Re-sults of conservative treatment. J Trauma. 1977;17:526-31.

23. Hawkins RJ, Bell RH, Anisette G. Acute patellar dislocations: The natural history. Am J Sports Med. 1986;14:117.

25. Yamamoto RK. Arthroscopic repair of the medial retinacu-lum and capsule in acute patellar dislocations. Arthroscopy. 1986;2:125-31.

26. Vainionpaa S, Laasonen E, Silvennoninen T, et al. Acute dislocation of the patella. A prospective review of operative treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990;72:366-9.

27. Sallay PI, Poggi J, Speer KP, et al. Acute dislocation of the patella: A correlative pathoanatomic study. Am J Sports Med. 1996;24:52-60.

28. Nikku R, Nietosvaara Y, Kallio PE, et al. Operative versus closed treatment of primary dislocation of the patella. Acta Orthop Scand. 1997;68:419-23.

30. Amis A, Dejour D. Simulation of trochlear dysplasia: Effects on passive patellar mobility. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Patellofemoral Group, October 24-26, 2003; Naples, Italy.

31. Fithian DC, Paxton EW, Stone ML, et al. Epidemiology and natural history of acute patellar dislocation. Am J Sports Med. 2004 Jul-Aug;32(5):1114-21.

24. Vaccaro AR (ed). Orthopaedic Knowledge Update 8: Home Study Syllabus, Rosemont, Illinois: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 2003.

29. Fulkerson JP. Diseases of the Patellofemoral Joint (3rd ed). Baltimore, Williams and Wilkins, 1999.

32. Stanitski CL. Articular hypermobility and chondral injury in patients with acute patellar dislocation, Am J Sports Med. 1995;23:146-50.

33. Insall J, Goldberg V, Salvati E. Recurrent dislocation and the high-riding patella. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1972;(88);67-9.

34. Merchant AC, Mercer RL, Jacobsen RH, Cool CR. Roent-genographic analysis of patellofemoral congruence. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1974;56:1391-6.

35. Laurin CA, Dussault R, Levesque HP. The tangential x-ray investigation of the patellofemoral joint. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1979;(144):16-26.

36. Aglietti P, Insall JN, Cerulli G. Patellar pain and incongru-


ence. I: Measurements of incongruence. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983;(176);217-24.

37. Teitge RA, Faerber WW, Des Madryl P, et al. Stress radio-graphs of the patellofemoral joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78:193-203.

38. Inoue M, Shino K, Hirose H, et al. Subluxation of the patella: Computed tomography analysis of patellofemoral congruence. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1988;70:1331-7.

39. Jones RB, Barlett EC, Vainright JR, Carroll RG. CT determi-nation of tibial tubercle lateralization in patients presenting with anterior knee pain. Skeletal Radiol. 1995 Oct;24(7):505-9.

40. Shakespeare D, Fick D. Patellar instability. Can the TT-TG distance be measured clinically? Knee. 2005 Jun;12(3):201-4.

41. Shellock FG, Mink JH, Deutsch AL, Fox JM. Patellar track-ing abnormalities: Clinical experience with kinematic MR imaging in 130 patients. Radiology. 1989;172:799-804.

42. Muhle C, Brinkmann G, Skaf A, et al. Effect of a patellar realignment brace on patients with patellar subluxation and dislocation: Evaluation with kinematic magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Sports Med. 1999;27:350-3.

43. Insall J. Patella pain: Current Concepts Review. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982;64;147-52.

44. Fithian DC, Paxton EW, Cohen AB. Indications in the treat-ment of patellar instability. J Knee Surg. 2004 Jan;17(1):47-56.

45. Halbrecht JL. Arthroscopic patella realignment: An all-inside technique. Arthroscopy. 2001 Nov-Dec;17(9):940-5.

46. Avikainen VJ, Nikku RK, Seppanen-Lehmonen TK. Adductor magnus tenodesis for patellar dislocation: Technique and pre-liminary results. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;(297):12-6.

47. Muneta T, Sekiya I, Tsuchiya M, et al. A technique for recon-struction of the medial patellofemoral ligament. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1999;(359):151-5.

48. Drez D Jr, Edwards TB, Williams CS. Results of medial patel-

lofemoral ligament reconstruction in the treatment of patellar dislocation. Arthroscopy. 2001 Mar;17(3):298-306.

49. Kolowich PA, Paulos LE, Rosenberg TD, Farnsworth S. Lat-eral release of the patella: Indications and contraindications. Am J Sports Med. 1990 Jul-Aug;18(4):359-65.

50. Roux C. Luxation habituelle de la rotule: Traitement opera-toire. Rev Chir Orthop. 1888;8:682-9.

51. Trillat A, Dejour H, Couette A. Diagnostic et traitement des subluxation recidivantes de la rotule. Rev Chir Orthop. 1964;50:813-24.

52. Shelbourne KD, Porter DA, Rozzi W. Use of a modified Elmslie-Trillat procedure to improve abnormal patellar con-gruence angle. Am J Sports Med. 1994;22:318-32.

53. Maquet P. Un traitement biomecanique de l’arthrose femoro-patellaire. L’advancement du tendon rotulien. Rev Rhum Mal Osteoartic. 1963;30:779-83.

54. Cohen E. La chondropathie interne de la rotule. J Traumatol Sport. 1999;16:3-8.

55. Bandi W. Zur operative therapie der chondromalacia patellae. Zentralbl Chir. 1977;102:1297-301.

56. Fulkerson J, Becker G, Meaney J, et al. Anteromedial tibial tubercle transfer without bone graft. Am J Sports Med. 1990;18:490-6.

57. Dejour H, Walch G, Nove-Josserand L, Guier C. Factors of patellar instability: An anatomic radiographic study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1994;2:19-26.

58. Verdonk R, Jansegers E, Stuyts B. Trochleoplasty in dysplastic knee trochlea. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. Epub 2005 Jan 11.

59. Hughston JC, Walsh WM. Proximal and distal reconstruction of the extensor mechanism for patellar subluxation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1979;(144):36-42.

60. Palmer SH, Servant CT, Maguire J, et al. Surgical reconstruc-tion of severe patellofemoral maltracking. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 Feb;(419):144-8.

Documents

Patella Instability - presentationgrafix.compresentationgrafix.com/_dev/cake/files/archive/pdfs/549.pdf · muscle to knee extension. They demonstrated that the vastus lateralis pulls