Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Copyright 2011 Copyright 2011 Rigsbee Research Rigsbee Research www.Rigsbee.comwww.Rigsbee.com
Partnering for ProfitsPartnering for Profits
By Ed Rigsbee, CSPBy Ed Rigsbee, CSP1746 1746 CalleCalle Yucca, Suite 200Yucca, Suite 200Thousand Oaks, CA 91360Thousand Oaks, CA 91360
[email protected]@Rigsbee.com
Copyright 2011 Copyright 2011 Rigsbee Research Rigsbee Research www.Rigsbee.comwww.Rigsbee.com
Principle of Allied Effort“That which one man can accomplish single handed, during an entire life-time, is but meagre at best, no matter how well organized that man may be, but that which one man may accomplish through the principle of alliance with other men is practically without limitation.”–Napoleon Hill, The Law of Success Vol. ll, 1937
Copyright 2011 Copyright 2011 Rigsbee Research Rigsbee Research www.Rigsbee.comwww.Rigsbee.com
Partnering DefinedPartnering Defined
““Partnering is the Process of Two or Partnering is the Process of Two or More Entities Coming Together for the More Entities Coming Together for the
Purpose of Developing Synergistic Purpose of Developing Synergistic Solutions to Their Challenges.Solutions to Their Challenges.””
““Partnering is about PeoplePartnering is about People””
Copyright 2004 Ed Rigsbee
Copyright 2011 Copyright 2011 Rigsbee Research Rigsbee Research www.Rigsbee.comwww.Rigsbee.com
While the usage of partnering While the usage of partnering alliance relationships is growing alliance relationships is growing dramatically, the use of formal dramatically, the use of formal alliance tools, practices, and alliance tools, practices, and management is not. management is not. Unfortunately, much value is Unfortunately, much value is being left on the table.being left on the table.
Copyright 2011 Copyright 2011 Rigsbee Research Rigsbee Research www.Rigsbee.comwww.Rigsbee.com
Collaborative NetworkCollaborative Network
Copyright 2011 Copyright 2011 Rigsbee Research Rigsbee Research www.Rigsbee.comwww.Rigsbee.com
What Partnering IsnWhat Partnering Isn’’tt
•• Quick FixQuick Fix•• Instant GratificationInstant Gratification•• FlavorFlavor--ofof--thethe--Month Month
Management StrategyManagement Strategy
Copyright 2011 Copyright 2011 Rigsbee Research Rigsbee Research www.Rigsbee.comwww.Rigsbee.com
Alliance Alchemy (formula); Alliance Alchemy (formula); Turning Relationships Into GoldTurning Relationships Into Gold
1.1. Seven Seven stepssteps for developing for developing successful collaborations.successful collaborations.
2.2. Three behavioral Three behavioral keyskeys for for collaboration successcollaboration success
Copyright 2011 Copyright 2011 Rigsbee Research Rigsbee Research www.Rigsbee.comwww.Rigsbee.com
Seven Steps for Smart Alliance Seven Steps for Smart Alliance Development & ImplementationDevelopment & Implementation
1.1. Monitor Monitor 2.2. EducateEducate3.3. Select Alliance TypeSelect Alliance Type4.4. OrganizeOrganize5.5. AgreementAgreement6.6. ImplementationImplementation7.7. MaintenanceMaintenance
Research & Research & AcquisitionAcquisition
““Find ItFind It””
Corp. Biz DevelopmentCorp. Biz Development
““Get ItGet It””
Alliance ManagementAlliance Management
““Create ValueCreate Value””
Copyright 2011 Copyright 2011 Rigsbee Research Rigsbee Research www.Rigsbee.comwww.Rigsbee.com
BlueBlue OceansOceans Vs. Vs. Red OceansRed Oceans
Cirque du Soleil: Founded in 1984 by a group of Cirque du Soleil: Founded in 1984 by a group of street performers. Cirque has staged dozens of street performers. Cirque has staged dozens of productions seen by some 40 million people in 90 productions seen by some 40 million people in 90 cities around the world. In 20 years, Cirque has cities around the world. In 20 years, Cirque has achieved revenues that Ringling Bros. and Barnum & achieved revenues that Ringling Bros. and Barnum & BaileyBailey——the worldthe world’’s leading circuss leading circus–– took more than a took more than a century to attain.century to attain.
Blue Ocean Strategy: How to Blue Ocean Strategy: How to Create Uncontested Market Create Uncontested Market Space and Make the Competition Space and Make the Competition IrrelevantIrrelevant
Harvard Business School PressHarvard Business School Press
Copyright 2011 Copyright 2011 Rigsbee Research Rigsbee Research www.Rigsbee.comwww.Rigsbee.com
Step #1 Step #1 Monitor; Determine Reasons Monitor; Determine Reasons and Need and Need for Partnering Alliancefor Partnering Alliance
•• Share RiskShare Risk•• CoCo--BrandingBranding•• Cross PromotionCross Promotion•• Affinity ProgramsAffinity Programs•• Fending off CompetitionFending off Competition•• DistributionDistribution•• Buying ParityBuying Parity•• Research & TechnologyResearch & Technology•• Serving National CustomerServing National Customer•• Increase Service CapabilitiesIncrease Service Capabilities
More at: www.Rigsbee.com/dsa1.htmMore at: www.Rigsbee.com/dsa1.htm
Copyright 2011 Copyright 2011 Rigsbee Research Rigsbee Research www.Rigsbee.comwww.Rigsbee.com
Partnering with CompetitorsPartnering with Competitors•• Northrop Grumman & Lockheed MartinNorthrop Grumman & Lockheed Martin
–– Joint Strike FighterJoint Strike Fighter----US Pentagon plans to US Pentagon plans to buy 2,500 over the next 20 years ($276 buy 2,500 over the next 20 years ($276 Billion)Billion)
•• FF--35A for Air Force, replaces F35A for Air Force, replaces F--16 & A16 & A--1010•• FF--35B for Marine Corp, replaces F/A 18 & AV8B35B for Marine Corp, replaces F/A 18 & AV8B•• FF--35C for Navy, replaces F/A35C for Navy, replaces F/A--1818
–– Fuselages built in California by Northrop Fuselages built in California by Northrop GrummanGrumman
–– Final assembly by Lockheed Martin in TexasFinal assembly by Lockheed Martin in Texas–– Costlier materials but $5 Billion savings per Costlier materials but $5 Billion savings per
unitunit
Copyright 2011 Copyright 2011 Rigsbee Research Rigsbee Research www.Rigsbee.comwww.Rigsbee.com
Competitor AllianceCompetitor Alliance Benefit Risk Benefit Risk
•• Strengthening the Strengthening the business & market business & market shareshare
•• Cost savingsCost savings•• Sharing technologySharing technology•• Capital availabilityCapital availability•• Good products & Good products &
services to customerservices to customer•• Becoming more Becoming more
efficient & productiveefficient & productive
•• Exposing your Exposing your technical know howtechnical know how
•• Losing potential Losing potential market sharemarket share
•• Power strugglePower struggle•• Potential loss of Potential loss of
human resourcehuman resource•• Difficulty in managing Difficulty in managing
balancebalance•• Branding conflictsBranding conflicts
Copyright 2011 Copyright 2011 Rigsbee Research Rigsbee Research www.Rigsbee.comwww.Rigsbee.com
Step #2 Educate; Cultural, Operational Step #2 Educate; Cultural, Operational and Strategic Differencesand Strategic Differences
•• Cultural:Cultural: How compatible are the How compatible are the management teams and cultures?management teams and cultures?
•• Strategic:Strategic: How well aligned are the How well aligned are the partnerspartners’’ objectives?objectives?
•• Operational:Operational: How complementary are the How complementary are the business models?business models?
•• Why collaboration is Why collaboration is in the best interestin the best interest of the organization and the persons of the organization and the persons working for the organizationworking for the organization……
Copyright 2011 Copyright 2011 Rigsbee Research Rigsbee Research www.Rigsbee.comwww.Rigsbee.com
Beginning Relationship DevelopmentBeginning Relationship Development•• Gaining internal approvalsGaining internal approvals•• Evaluating the candidate Evaluating the candidate •• Positioning your company Positioning your company •• Developing trust with the corporate cultureDeveloping trust with the corporate culture•• Understanding the partner's corporate Understanding the partner's corporate
cultureculture•• Corporate, individual, and project Corporate, individual, and project
personality diagnosticspersonality diagnostics•• Gathering details on market/salesGathering details on market/sales•• Gathering information on R&D Gathering information on R&D
Copyright 2011 Copyright 2011 Rigsbee Research Rigsbee Research www.Rigsbee.comwww.Rigsbee.com
•• Basic AllianceBasic Alliance (Casually Access Various Arising Opportunities)(Casually Access Various Arising Opportunities)–– New Programs Affecting Several StakeholdersNew Programs Affecting Several Stakeholders
•• Formal Strategic Alliance Formal Strategic Alliance (Partners Retain Identities)(Partners Retain Identities)–– CoCo--Branding Relationship Branding Relationship (Duo Logos & Names)(Duo Logos & Names)– Service Exchange
•• Strategic Sourcing RelationshipStrategic Sourcing Relationship–– Vendors/SuppliersVendors/Suppliers– Service Agreements– Consolidation of Jurisdictions
•• Joint Venture Joint Venture (New Organization & Identity)(New Organization & Identity)– Joint Service Agreement– Public-Private Partnerships
•• Strategic Reseller RelationshipStrategic Reseller Relationship–– Educational Programs, Dealers, Distributors or VARsEducational Programs, Dealers, Distributors or VARs
•• Licensing AgreementsLicensing Agreements–– CertificationCertification
Step #3Step #3 Select Alliance Type/StructureSelect Alliance Type/Structure
Copyright 2011 Copyright 2011 Rigsbee Research Rigsbee Research www.Rigsbee.comwww.Rigsbee.com
Understand Alliance Understand Alliance Buying/Acceptance MotivesBuying/Acceptance Motives
1.1. Profits or GainProfits or Gain2.2. Fear of LossFear of Loss3.3. Comforts and PleasureComforts and Pleasure4.4. Avoidance of PainAvoidance of Pain5.5. Loving and Affection Loving and Affection 6.6. Pride and PrestigePride and Prestige
Copyright 2011 Copyright 2011 Rigsbee Research Rigsbee Research www.Rigsbee.comwww.Rigsbee.com
Step #4 Organize Your Collaboration:Step #4 Organize Your Collaboration: Partner Due DiligencePartner Due Diligence
Alliance, JV, Strategic Sourcing
Agreement
Offering Partner
Accepting Partner
Research: Suppliers,
Stakeholders, Departmental Silos, Internet,
Through SWOT
Alliance Offer
Counter Offer
Research: Suppliers,
Stakeholders, Departmental Silos, Internet,
Through SWOT
Copyright 2011 Copyright 2011 Rigsbee Research Rigsbee Research www.Rigsbee.comwww.Rigsbee.com
Relationship Due DiligenceRelationship Due Diligence•• In the past relationships with this partner, what has been In the past relationships with this partner, what has been
the quality of the working relationship?the quality of the working relationship?–– PositivePositive–– NegativeNegative
•• What is the companyWhat is the company’’s conflict resolution style?s conflict resolution style?–– AvoidAvoid–– Engage ineffectivelyEngage ineffectively–– Engage effectivelyEngage effectively
•• What is the companyWhat is the company’’s decisions decision--making style?making style?–– HierarchicalHierarchical–– ConsensusConsensus--drivendriven
•• What is the companyWhat is the company’’s information sharing style?s information sharing style?–– OpenOpen–– ClosedClosed
•• What is the companyWhat is the company’’s operating style?s operating style?–– ProcessProcess--drivendriven–– Ad hocAd hoc
•• Etc.Etc.
Copyright 2011 Copyright 2011 Rigsbee Research Rigsbee Research www.Rigsbee.comwww.Rigsbee.com
““What Kind of a Partner am I?What Kind of a Partner am I?””Assign each a 1 to 10 rating and total:Assign each a 1 to 10 rating and total:
Wants to win.Wants to win. Responsible for his/her own success.Responsible for his/her own success. Is an active listener.Is an active listener. Understands and cares about what drives partnerUnderstands and cares about what drives partner’’s s
business.business. Responds well and acts on feedback.Responds well and acts on feedback. Flexible, especially when the unexpected occurs.Flexible, especially when the unexpected occurs. Trustworthy and has integrity.Trustworthy and has integrity. Seeks winSeeks win--win situations and solutions.win situations and solutions. Understands that Partnering is a relationship of Understands that Partnering is a relationship of
interdependence.interdependence. Great Chemistry!Great Chemistry! Your TotalYour Total (1 to 100)(1 to 100) www.rigsbee.com/quiz.htmwww.rigsbee.com/quiz.htm
Copyright 2011 Copyright 2011 Rigsbee Research Rigsbee Research www.Rigsbee.comwww.Rigsbee.com
Partnering RoadblocksPartnering Roadblocks•• Partners having Partners having conflicted core valuesconflicted core values. Issues like trust . Issues like trust
and integrity. Corporate culture clashes, employee turf and integrity. Corporate culture clashes, employee turf protection, and resistance of some employees to new protection, and resistance of some employees to new ideas can reek havoc on your alliance efforts. ideas can reek havoc on your alliance efforts.
•• Relinquishing some controlRelinquishing some control with the expectation of with the expectation of greater shared returns can be a difficult waiting game.greater shared returns can be a difficult waiting game.
•• One partner One partner not completely embracing the principles of not completely embracing the principles of partneringpartnering at the top level or even in departments, at the top level or even in departments, divisions or regions while the other does.divisions or regions while the other does.
•• Underestimating how much timeUnderestimating how much time, energy and resources , energy and resources will be necessary to commit to your new alliance.will be necessary to commit to your new alliance.
•• ComplacencyComplacency, is an insidious relationship, is an insidious relationship--killer.killer.•• Difficulty in Difficulty in communicatingcommunicating..•• When When unequal dependenceunequal dependence in a relationship occurs, the in a relationship occurs, the
partner with the least dependence could be less likely to partner with the least dependence could be less likely to compromise and put energy into the relationship.compromise and put energy into the relationship.
Copyright 2011 Copyright 2011 Rigsbee Research Rigsbee Research www.Rigsbee.comwww.Rigsbee.com
Step #5: Reaching the AgreementStep #5: Reaching the Agreement
•• Final decision and evaluation of Final decision and evaluation of strategic partnership objectives:strategic partnership objectives:–– Determining if the partnership meets the Determining if the partnership meets the
objectivesobjectives–– Balancing the human dimension with Balancing the human dimension with
the business issuesthe business issues–– Creating a negotiation and agreement Creating a negotiation and agreement
strategystrategy–– The lawyer's perspective; see ChecklistThe lawyer's perspective; see Checklist
Copyright 2011 Copyright 2011 Rigsbee Research Rigsbee Research www.Rigsbee.comwww.Rigsbee.com
Step #5 Agreement/MOUStep #5 Agreement/MOU
•• Legal issuesLegal issues•• Tax issuesTax issues•• Pricing issuesPricing issues•• Payment structure Payment structure
variationsvariations•• Audit rightsAudit rights•• Information rightsInformation rights•• Confidentiality issuesConfidentiality issues•• Exclusivity variationsExclusivity variations•• Performance Performance
assurancesassurances
•• Right to cure variationsRight to cure variations•• Term of agreementTerm of agreement•• Termination issuesTermination issues•• Condition of default issuesCondition of default issues•• PostPost--termination issuestermination issues•• Assignment issuesAssignment issues•• Warranty & liability issuesWarranty & liability issues•• Ways to hedge Ways to hedge
commitmentscommitments•• Indemnification options & Indemnification options &
issuesissues•• RemediesRemedies
Copyright 2011 Copyright 2011 Rigsbee Research Rigsbee Research www.Rigsbee.comwww.Rigsbee.com
Step #6Step #6 ImplementationImplementation•• Systems (alliance nuts & bolts)Systems (alliance nuts & bolts)
–– Systematic Alliance Relationship LaunchSystematic Alliance Relationship Launch–– Shared & Different ProtocolsShared & Different Protocols–– Joint Governance MeetingsJoint Governance Meetings–– DayDay--toto--Day Decision Culture Consensual or Day Decision Culture Consensual or
Hierarchical?Hierarchical?•• MeasurementsMeasurements
–– Alliance GoalsAlliance Goals–– Alliance Progress: Performance in Information Alliance Progress: Performance in Information
Sharing, New Idea Development, & Speed of Sharing, New Idea Development, & Speed of Decision Making.Decision Making.
Copyright 2011 Copyright 2011 Rigsbee Research Rigsbee Research www.Rigsbee.comwww.Rigsbee.com
Alliance Tool Usage Europe vs. USAAlliance Tool Usage Europe vs. USA
Source: Source: ASAPASAP’’ss Second State of Alliance Management Study 2007Second State of Alliance Management Study 2007
Tools Europe USABest alliance practices 80% 68%
Alliance database 55% 60%Alliance handbook 33% 40%
Alliance management is part of the management development program 29% 36%Alliance metrics 61% 74%
Competency framework for alliance manager exists 41% 41%Cross-alliance evaluation 53% 48%
Culture program 33% 26%External alliance training 32% 47%In-house alliance training 51% 48%
Individual evaluation 82% 81%Intranet 71% 73%
Joint business planning 80% 84%Joint evaluation 75% 74%
Partner portal 60% 68%Partner programs 69% 77%
Standard partner selection approach 67% 67%
Copyright 2011 Copyright 2011 Rigsbee Research Rigsbee Research www.Rigsbee.comwww.Rigsbee.com
Ten Key Corporate CapabilitiesTen Key Corporate Capabilities•• Building & maintaining internal alignmentBuilding & maintaining internal alignment•• Evaluating & considering relationship fit with Evaluating & considering relationship fit with
potential partnerspotential partners•• Building strong working relationships while Building strong working relationships while
negotiating optimal dealsnegotiating optimal deals•• Establishing common ground rules for working Establishing common ground rules for working
togethertogether•• Having dedicated alliance managersHaving dedicated alliance managers•• Having collaboration skills in alliance employeesHaving collaboration skills in alliance employees•• Having a collaborative corporate mindsetHaving a collaborative corporate mindset•• Managing multiple relationships with the same Managing multiple relationships with the same
partnerpartner•• Auditing alliance relationshipsAuditing alliance relationships•• Managing changes that affect alliancesManaging changes that affect alliances
Source: Vantage Partners 2001 & 2006 survey; Managing Alliance Relationships: Ten Key Capabilities
Copyright 2011 Copyright 2011 Rigsbee Research Rigsbee Research www.Rigsbee.comwww.Rigsbee.com
Lilly Lilly (Pharmaceutical)(Pharmaceutical) ThreeThree--Person Alliance Person Alliance Management/Implementation TeamManagement/Implementation Team
•• Alliance Champion Alliance Champion –– Usually a Usually a senior level executivesenior level executive charged with, among other charged with, among other
activities, to facilitate and ensure communication between activities, to facilitate and ensure communication between Lilly and its alliance partnersLilly and its alliance partners
•• Alliance LeaderAlliance Leader–– Technical leader, project manager or senior person with Technical leader, project manager or senior person with
intimate knowledge of alliance area of activity; intimate knowledge of alliance area of activity; responsible responsible for dayfor day--toto--day leadership of the allianceday leadership of the alliance
•• Alliance ManagerAlliance Manager–– Represents the OAM, the executiveRepresents the OAM, the executive’’s primary duty is to s primary duty is to
support the alliance leader and support the alliance leader and act as an advocate for the act as an advocate for the alliancealliance (one person is Alliance Manager for several (one person is Alliance Manager for several alliances) alliances)
Copyright 2011 Copyright 2011 Rigsbee Research Rigsbee Research www.Rigsbee.comwww.Rigsbee.com
Measuring and Evaluating ResultsMeasuring and Evaluating Results•• Selecting options and assigning responsibility Selecting options and assigning responsibility
(alliance group, corporate or business unit, supplier (alliance group, corporate or business unit, supplier team)team)
•• Analyzing opportunity and team formationAnalyzing opportunity and team formation•• Organizational competency centers and team Organizational competency centers and team
formationformation•• Tactical planning and executionTactical planning and execution•• Operating and governing the allianceOperating and governing the alliance•• Stabilization and reviewStabilization and review----issue and conflict issue and conflict
resolution resolution •• Termination IssuesTermination Issues•• Benchmarking survey resultsBenchmarking survey results
Copyright 2011 Copyright 2011 Rigsbee Research Rigsbee Research www.Rigsbee.comwww.Rigsbee.com
•• Unspoken Clash Over Strategic DirectionUnspoken Clash Over Strategic Direction
•• Jointly Define & Promote Behaviors Considered Jointly Define & Promote Behaviors Considered Consistent with a Successful Relationship.Consistent with a Successful Relationship.
•• Do Not Allow the Unique Competencies of Each Partner Do Not Allow the Unique Competencies of Each Partner to Become Sources of Resentment Rather than to Become Sources of Resentment Rather than Success Enablers.Success Enablers.
•• Embrace Different Complementary Strengths, Embrace Different Complementary Strengths, Especially in Areas of: Technical Expertise, Culture, Especially in Areas of: Technical Expertise, Culture, Business Model, & Knowledge of Market Segments.Business Model, & Knowledge of Market Segments.
•• Do Not Allow Formal Governance Structures to Do Not Allow Formal Governance Structures to Discourage Collaborative Behavior.Discourage Collaborative Behavior.
Step #7 MaintenanceStep #7 Maintenance (Early Measurement of Progress and Cooperation)(Early Measurement of Progress and Cooperation)
Copyright 2011 Copyright 2011 Rigsbee Research Rigsbee Research www.Rigsbee.comwww.Rigsbee.com
Relationship Value UpdatesRelationship Value Updates
•• The value IThe value I’’m getting from the m getting from the relationship.relationship.
•• The Value I think you are The Value I think you are receiving.receiving.
•• Improvement StrategiesImprovement Strategies
More at: www.Rigsbee.com/dsa3.htmMore at: www.Rigsbee.com/dsa3.htm
Copyright 2011 Copyright 2011 Rigsbee Research Rigsbee Research www.Rigsbee.comwww.Rigsbee.com
Survey Question Areas: LillySurvey Question Areas: Lilly’’s Voice of the Alliances Voice of the Alliance
Operational Fit: Operational Fit: 1.1. CommunicationCommunication2.2. Decision MakingDecision Making3.3. LeadershipLeadership4.4. Performance Performance
ManagementManagement5.5. RolesRoles6.6. Skills/CompetenceSkills/Competence7.7. Team CoordinationTeam Coordination8.8. Conflict ManagementConflict Management
Cultural Fit:Cultural Fit:9.9. FlexibilityFlexibility10.10. Knowledge Knowledge
ManagementManagement11.11. Organizational Organizational
ValuesValues
Strategic Fit:Strategic Fit:12.12. CommitmentCommitment13.13. StrategyStrategy14.14. Trust/FairnessTrust/Fairness
Copyright 2011 Copyright 2011 Rigsbee Research Rigsbee Research www.Rigsbee.comwww.Rigsbee.com
How HP Perceived Itself How Microsoft Perceived HP
Collaborative partnering mindCollaborative partnering mind--setset——looks for the looks for the greater goodgreater good
A nonA non--player in servicesplayer in services
ReinventingReinventing——trying to get more focused under trying to get more focused under new CEOnew CEO’’s leaderships leadership
Falling behind its competitorsFalling behind its competitors
DisciplinedDisciplined——takes longtakes long--term, mature approach term, mature approach to evaluating market opportunitiesto evaluating market opportunities
Slow, bureaucraticSlow, bureaucratic——a laggarda laggard
WinWin--win partneringwin partnering——actively seeks the other actively seeks the other companycompany’’s winss wins
Unable to execute consistently and predictablyUnable to execute consistently and predictably
FlexibleFlexible——looks for creative dealslooks for creative deals Conflicted sales strategy in the fieldConflicted sales strategy in the field
How Microsoft Perceived Itself How HP Perceived Microsoft
Competitive, fast moving, and entrepreneurialCompetitive, fast moving, and entrepreneurial Excessively competitive and confrontationalExcessively competitive and confrontational
““Our products are changing the world in Our products are changing the world in profoundly positive waysprofoundly positive ways””
Controlling, paranoid, and greedyControlling, paranoid, and greedy
Center of new economyCenter of new economy ““WinWin——dondon’’t caret care”” partnering mindpartnering mind--setset
Focuses on objectives and assumes others do Focuses on objectives and assumes others do the samethe same
Focused only on the dealFocused only on the deal
Misunderstood: The world doesnMisunderstood: The world doesn’’t realize what t realize what positive things the company does for everyonepositive things the company does for everyone
PackagedPackaged--software mentalitysoftware mentality——commoditizescommoditizes everything, even partneringeverything, even partnering
Brings partners into deals, expecting they will Brings partners into deals, expecting they will be grateful and go get the business without be grateful and go get the business without continued handcontinued hand--holdingholding
DoesnDoesn’’t get itt get it——doesndoesn’’t know what it takes to sell t know what it takes to sell professional services to an enterprise customerprofessional services to an enterprise customer
Source: Harvard Business Review, November 2007
Copyright 2011 Copyright 2011 Rigsbee Research Rigsbee Research www.Rigsbee.comwww.Rigsbee.comSource: Harvard Business Review, November 2007
Today, more than 14 million Microsoft Today, more than 14 million Microsoft Exchange Server 2000/2003 user seats are Exchange Server 2000/2003 user seats are
under contract through HP Servicesunder contract through HP Services
Instead of Eliminating Differences, Instead of Eliminating Differences, Leverage to Create Value; HewlettLeverage to Create Value; Hewlett--Packard Packard
& Microsoft Collaborative Effort:& Microsoft Collaborative Effort:
Turning point came when alliance executives began systematically documenting differences between the companies and then held working sessions with team members to discuss
how those differences might benefit the alliance.
Copyright 2011 Copyright 2011 Rigsbee Research Rigsbee Research www.Rigsbee.comwww.Rigsbee.com
Maintaining AllianceMaintaining Alliance•• Educating employees to buy/own the ideaEducating employees to buy/own the idea•• LongLong--term relationshipterm relationship•• Additional alliancesAdditional alliances
–– Regular meetingsRegular meetings–– Multiple alliance trackingMultiple alliance tracking
•• Developing an integration/management plan Developing an integration/management plan •• Using human resources effectively Using human resources effectively •• Establishing lines of communicationEstablishing lines of communication•• Reevaluation of alliance legitimacy and viability Reevaluation of alliance legitimacy and viability •• Realigning expectationsRealigning expectations•• Managing change in the allianceManaging change in the alliance•• Alliance scenario buildingAlliance scenario building•• Alliance structure and governanceAlliance structure and governance
Copyright 2011 Copyright 2011 Rigsbee Research Rigsbee Research www.Rigsbee.comwww.Rigsbee.com
1.1. Getting Things Done vs. Being RightGetting Things Done vs. Being Right2.2. Relationship Bank DepositsRelationship Bank Deposits3.3. Purposeful CommunicationsPurposeful Communications
Three Behavioral Keys for Three Behavioral Keys for Turning Relationships Into GoldTurning Relationships Into Gold
Copyright 2011 Copyright 2011 Rigsbee Research Rigsbee Research www.Rigsbee.comwww.Rigsbee.com
Behavior #1Behavior #13 Keys for3 Keys for
Turning Relationships Into GoldTurning Relationships Into Gold
Getting Things Done vs. Being RightGetting Things Done vs. Being Right
1.1. Getting Things Done vs. Being RightGetting Things Done vs. Being Right2.2. Relationship Bank DepositsRelationship Bank Deposits3.3. Purposeful CommunicationsPurposeful Communications
Copyright 2011 Copyright 2011 Rigsbee Research Rigsbee Research www.Rigsbee.comwww.Rigsbee.com
““ItIt’’s more important to be a s more important to be a good partner and get things good partner and get things
done, than to obsess on BEING done, than to obsess on BEING RIGHT!RIGHT!””
––Ed RigsbeeEd Rigsbee
II’’m Rightm Right
Copyright 2011 Copyright 2011 Rigsbee Research Rigsbee Research www.Rigsbee.comwww.Rigsbee.com
BehaviorBehavior #2#2Relationship Bank DepositsRelationship Bank Deposits
1.1. Getting Things Done vs. Being RightGetting Things Done vs. Being Right2.2. Relationship Bank DepositsRelationship Bank Deposits3.3. Purposeful CommunicationsPurposeful Communications
3 Keys for3 Keys for
Turning Relationships Into GoldTurning Relationships Into Gold
Copyright 2011 Copyright 2011 Rigsbee Research Rigsbee Research www.Rigsbee.comwww.Rigsbee.com
•• EmotionalEmotional•• PhysicalPhysical
––UnrestrictedUnrestricted––ControlledControlled––Strings AttachedStrings Attached
Relationship Bank DepositsRelationship Bank Deposits
Copyright 2011 Copyright 2011 Rigsbee Research Rigsbee Research www.Rigsbee.comwww.Rigsbee.com
Over 100 of EdOver 100 of Ed’’s helpful s helpful articles are available for articles are available for download & Reprint at:download & Reprint at:www.rigsbee.comwww.rigsbee.com/morearticles.htm/morearticles.htm
Copyright 2011 Copyright 2011 Rigsbee Research Rigsbee Research www.Rigsbee.comwww.Rigsbee.com
Perception
““My only reality is My only reality is the conversation I the conversation I have with myself have with myself about you.about you.”” --Ed RigsbeeEd Rigsbee
Copyright 2011 Copyright 2011 Rigsbee Research Rigsbee Research www.Rigsbee.comwww.Rigsbee.com
Suppliers Say About Buyers Suppliers Say About Buyers (BSCAI)(BSCAI)
•• Fear of commitmentFear of commitment•• ““They are not willing to single source but still want our total They are not willing to single source but still want our total
bundle of valuebundle of value--added resources at no additional cost.added resources at no additional cost.””•• Operations level supportOperations level support
•• ““We get commitment from top management but the program We get commitment from top management but the program gets derailed at the operations level.gets derailed at the operations level.””
•• ““Top management is reluctant to mandate changes to Top management is reluctant to mandate changes to operationsoperations……they try to build consensus but it doesnthey try to build consensus but it doesn’’t t happen.happen.””
•• Communication breakdownCommunication breakdown•• ““Everyone is so busy we only communicate when there is a Everyone is so busy we only communicate when there is a
need for fire fightingneed for fire fighting……hence the relationship takes on a hence the relationship takes on a negative tone over time.negative tone over time.””
•• ““We never discuss mutual opportunitiesWe never discuss mutual opportunities……itit’’s always, How do s always, How do we fix what isnwe fix what isn’’t working?t working?””
More at: www.Rigsbee.com/ps1.htm
Copyright 2011 Copyright 2011 Rigsbee Research Rigsbee Research www.Rigsbee.comwww.Rigsbee.com
ABCs of Buy/Sell RelationshipsABCs of Buy/Sell Relationships•• AdversarialAdversarial (Traditional Win(Traditional Win——Lose)Lose)
–– Playing HardballPlaying Hardball–– Commodity Selling/BuyingCommodity Selling/Buying–– Single TransactionsSingle Transactions
•• Barometric (Always Measuring Atmosphere)Barometric (Always Measuring Atmosphere)–– Some Partnering Success, Still Working on TrustSome Partnering Success, Still Working on Trust
•• ComplementaryComplementary (Partnership)(Partnership)–– Circles of Interest OverlapCircles of Interest Overlap–– Work in HarmonyWork in Harmony–– Vendor Managed InventoryVendor Managed Inventory–– Single SourceSingle Source
www.rigsbee.com/ps4.htm
Copyright 2011 Copyright 2011 Rigsbee Research Rigsbee Research www.Rigsbee.comwww.Rigsbee.com
AdversarialAdversarial
(Transactional(Transactional-- Few Deposits)Few Deposits)
ComplementaryComplementary
(Transformational(Transformational-- Many Deposits)Many Deposits)
The Relationship ContinuumThe Relationship Continuum
Copyright 2011 Copyright 2011 Rigsbee Research Rigsbee Research www.Rigsbee.comwww.Rigsbee.com
BehaviorBehavior #3#3Purposeful Communications Purposeful Communications
for Overcoming Conflictfor Overcoming Conflict1.1. Getting Things Done vs. Being RightGetting Things Done vs. Being Right2.2. Relationship Bank DepositsRelationship Bank Deposits3.3. Purposeful CommunicationPurposeful Communication
3 Keys for3 Keys for
Turning Relationships Into GoldTurning Relationships Into Gold
Copyright 2011 Copyright 2011 Rigsbee Research Rigsbee Research www.Rigsbee.comwww.Rigsbee.com
Recent Rigsbee Research Survey
• 28% Communication • 20% Follow up/Follow through• 17% Changing the behavior of others• 9% Truth, honesty & responsibility• 8% Training issues• 5% Time compression• 5% Customer issues• 4% Conflict in dealing with personalities• 4% Conflicting goals
Copyright 2011 Copyright 2011 Rigsbee Research Rigsbee Research www.Rigsbee.comwww.Rigsbee.com
Communicating to Deal with Communicating to Deal with the Relationship Challengesthe Relationship Challenges
•• Hidden AgendasHidden Agendas•• TrustTrust•• Unrealistic ExpectationsUnrealistic Expectations•• Poor CommunicationPoor Communication•• Culture ClashesCulture Clashes
Copyright 2011 Copyright 2011 Rigsbee Research Rigsbee Research www.Rigsbee.comwww.Rigsbee.com
People do not change People do not change after marriage! What after marriage! What
you see is what you get.you see is what you get.
Copyright 2011 Copyright 2011 Rigsbee Research Rigsbee Research www.Rigsbee.comwww.Rigsbee.com
Thank YouThank You•• Access all EdAccess all Ed’’s partnering s partnering
articles at: articles at: www.rigsbee.com/morearticles.htmwww.rigsbee.com/morearticles.htm