Upload
vanmien
View
215
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Ministry of Health
Draft Report
Prepared by
PARTICIPATORY CAPACITY AND NEEDS
ASSESSMENT FOR KEY LOCAL PARTNERS
AND TARGETED COMMUNITIES (To Design, Implement and Monitor Nutrition and Food Security
Interventions; To Define Community Based Interventions)
January 2012
Participatory Capacity and Needs Assessment
Ch
ap
ter:
Acr
on
ym
s
2
ACRONYMS
ADHS Albania Demographic and Health Survey
CSO Civil Society Organization
FAO Food and Agriculture Organization
FNS Food and nutrition security
IDA Iron Deficiency Anemia
IDD Iodine Deficiency Disorders
INSTAT Albanian National Institute of Statistics
JPN Joint Programme on Nutrition
LGU Local Government Unit
MADA Mountain Area Development Agency
MDGF Millennium Development Goals Achievement Fund
NGO Non-governmental Organization
PfD Foundation Partnership for development
PLA Participatory Learning and Action
PPS Participatory Priority Setting
PRA Participatory Rural Appraisal
RPA Rapid Participatory Appraisal
RRA Rapid Rural Appraisal
UNICEF United Nations Children's Fund
WHO World Health Organization
Participatory Capacity and Needs Assessment
Ch
ap
ter:
Ta
ble
of
Co
nte
nts
3
TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS 2
TABLE OF CONTENTS 3
LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES 4
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5
1. INTRODUCTION 8
1.1. Brief background 8
1.2. Definition and concepts of food and nutrition security 9
1.3. Purpose of the study 12
1.4. Methodology and approach of the study 12
1.4.1. Overview of the approach 12
1.4.2. A step-wise implementation approach 13
2. MAIN FINDINGS OF THE STUDY 17
2.1. Overview of the study area 17
2.2. Awareness and knowledge on food and nutrition security concepts 19
2.2.1. Level of knowledge of FNS concepts at local authority level 19
2.2.2. Level of community knowledge on nutrition concepts 23
2.3. Main factors of malnutrition and food insecurity 26
2.4. Local government capacities in dealing with FNS and coordination issues 30
2.5. Opportunities to increase food availability 33
2.5.1. Perceptions of local authorities on food availability opportunities 33
2.5.2. Perceptions of communities on food availability opportunities 34
2.6. Community opinions on food security and nutrition interventions 37
2.7. Improving local capacities 39
3. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 41
4. ANNEXES 43
Annex 1. Details of proposed interventions 43
Annex 2. Aditional tables 48
Participatory Capacity and Needs Assessment
Ch
ap
ter:
Lis
t o
f fi
gu
res
an
d t
ab
les
4
LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES
Figure 1. Conceptual framework of malnutrition (UNICEF, 1991) .................................................................. 10 Figure 2. Conceptual framework of the nutritional status at household and individual level ............... 11 Figure 3. Determinants of Food and Nutrition Security ..................................................................................... 11
Figure 4. Aggregated scoring of key actors’ knowledge and understanding of key actors on malnutrition ....................................................................................................................................................... 19
Figure 5. Level of overall community awareness on nutrition issues ............................................................ 23 Figure 6. Main causes of malnutrition as perceived by the local authority representatives ................. 27 Figure 7. Main causes of malnutrition according to three main groups factors, as perceives by local
authorities .......................................................................................................................................................... 28
Figure 8. Main causes of malnutrition and food insecurity as perceives by community representatives according to the four main food security components ..................................... 30
Figure 9. Weighted level of LG capacities to deal with FNS issues at their territory ............................... 31
Figure 10. Importance of main groups of opportunities to increase food production ............................. 34
Figure 11. Main mission/limited food components in the usual diet ............................................................ 35 Figure 12. Possibilities for more fruits, vegetables, forest fruits and hers (by regions) ........................ 36 Figure 13. Opportunities to increase food production ......................................................................................... 36
Figure 14. Possibilities for more fruits, vegetables, forest fruits and herbs ................................................ 36
Figure 15. Main categories of interventions to improve food security proposed by communities (by region) ................................................................................................................................................................ 38
Figure 16. Main categories of interventions to improve food security proposed by community ...... 38 Figure 17. Main categories of interventions proposal by civil society members ........................................ 38
Figure 18. What should change to improve the local nutrition situation? .................................................... 39
Figure 19. Most effective interventions proposed to improve capacities and nutrition situation ........ 39 Figure 20. Potential categories off actors to be involved in public information about nutrition .......... 40
Table 1. Number and distribution of focus groups held with key stakeholders ............................ 15
Table 2. Main characteristics of the targeted study area ......................................................... 17
Table 3. The level of local authorities’ knowledge about concepts and components of food security
and malnutrition .................................................................................................. 20
Table 4. Main topics proposed to be covered by potential capacity building interventions at local
authority level for improving knowledge on food security and nutrition concepts .......... 22
Table 5. The level of community knowledge about concept and types of malnutrition ................. 24
Table 6. Main topics proposed for interpersonal communication interventions at community level
for improving knowledge on nutrition concepts ........................................................ 25
Table 7. Main factors impacting food security and nutrition in the study area ............................ 26
Table 8. The assessment of the current experience and capacities of LG (according to main
identified capacity issues) ..................................................................................... 32
Participatory Capacity and Needs Assessment
Ch
ap
ter:
Ex
ecu
tiv
e s
um
ma
ry
5
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The nutritional status of children has improved over the last 5 years. However, children face
multiple nutrition problems including high rates of stunting and overweight, disparities in
health and nutrition status and micronutrient deficiencies. Anemia (as one of the major
effects malnutrition, especially in young children) is considerable higher in rural areas than
in urban areas, for children of women with no education and for lowest wealth quintile.
Designing and implementation of cross sectorial interventions addressing malnutrition and
household food insecurity is an important component of the current nutrition programme.
The involvement of the community and key local stakeholders will help ensure endorsement
and validation of planned interventions, effectively mobilize the community and contribute
to sustainability of interventions. In this context, UNICEF, WHO, FAO, in cooperation with
Albanian Government are implementing a Joint Programme on Nutrition aiming to help
improve the nutrition situation in Albania.
The main purposes of this study was to: (i) identify needs/existing gaps of community based
partners and CSOs working with communities in the target areas to design, implement and
monitor nutrition and food security interventions; (ii) conduct a participatory needs
assessment at community level to define community based interventions in target areas;
and (iii) synthetize the results of both assessments in the form of a final report including the
recommendations for trainings and the proposed package of community based
interventions.
The study area included 15 local government units (LGUs) in three regions (7 in Kukes, 6 in
Shkoder and 2 in Tirana). The targeted areas cover a total area of 1.430 Km2 and have about
37.600 hectares of arable land. The 15 targeted LGUs have a population of about 153
thousand inhabitants and about 35,200 households. The approach selected for the
implementation of this assignment is based mainly on the Participatory Learning and Action
(PLA) approach, involving in itself a wide range of tools. The selection of the target area was
done by the JPN and included 15 local government units in three regions (7 in Kukes, 6 in
Shkodra and 2 in Tirana). In addition to a large number of individual meetings held with
representatives of various institutions, organizations and individual experts, 63 focus groups
consisting of about 10-15 members each (or about 760 persons attending these focus
groups) were held with the key regional and local stakeholders.
The assessment has been implemented during the period of October-December 2011 and
main findings of the assessment are as follows:
Participatory Capacity and Needs Assessment
Ch
ap
ter:
Ex
ecu
tiv
e s
um
ma
ry
6
• The overall level of awareness, knowledge and information of key regional and local
actors about nutrition issues (nutrition in general and especially related to children and
women) remain generally low, both at the regional and local level. The highest level of
awareness and knowledge on the subject was shows within the health sector specialists,
most of which could make a dissent description of nutrition and its causes and effects on
the population.
• The main identified causes of food insecurity and malnutrition are linked with: (i) the
overall level of local community development (mainly related to overall poverty level,
low local production capacities, limited market access and organization, limited non-
agriculture income generating activities, low incomes and purchasing power,
vulnerability to price fluctuations; traditional practices and lifestyle; (ii) the level of
community education and information, mainly related to improved production and
processing technologies and practices; limited market information, limited knowledge on
risk mitigation practices, limited knowledge on good nutrition practices; and (iii)
objective reasons mainly linked to overall economic context of the country and the
region, unfavour agro-ecological conditions for food production, limited job
opportunities, low efficiency of local support institutions, etc.
• Within the local authority actors, the health sector seems to be more involved and more
efficient in dealing with nutrition issues at community level. The agriculture sector
provides some support towards food security mainly through their advice to producers.
However, despite their potently important role, most communities perceive the
agriculture, social and education sectors as having low efficiency in improving nutrition
situation at local level. The current role of the local government administration in
dealing with the nutrition and food security issues remains very limited throughout the
study area. Only few of the local government representatives declared to have some
capacities and little previous experience in monitoring and reporting, while major
capacity gaps, mainly as regards assessment of food security and nutrition situation,
planning interventions and coordination of actors and actions.
• The majority of the targeted areas have significant opportunities to increase the
production and availability of food products within their territory, which are still unused
and/or unexploited due to the lack of capacities of the local actors and of the population
to transform them into goods for the betterment of the living conditions.
• The exploitation of these existing opportunities for improving food and nutrition security
may be reached through well targeted interventions focusing mainly on: (i) improving
post harvesting, handling and processing tools, technologies and practices; (ii)
introducing new types of productions and food products, and; (iii) increasing the
quantity of production of the current crops and livestock. In addition, these
interventions should be accompanied by information, trainings, advice and technical
assistance to the producers (on food security strategies and practices) and consumers
(on nutrition issues).
Participatory Capacity and Needs Assessment
Ch
ap
ter:
Ex
ecu
tiv
e s
um
ma
ry
7
• Improving the capacities of the local actors (especially local government) to plan,
monitor, report and implement food and nutrition security interventions, improvement
of coordination of actions between these actors and the improvement of community
information and knowledge are three very important challenges for the improvement of
the nutrition situation in all targeted areas.
Participatory Capacity and Needs Assessment
Ch
ap
ter:
1.
Intr
od
uct
ion
8
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1. Brief background 1
Children in Albania face many challenges that affect their chances for a better start in life
and reduce their potential to lead productive lives as adults. In spite of relatively low U5
mortality rates (22 per 1,000 - still high compared to other countries in the region) and good
exclusive breastfeeding rates in the first months of life, Albanian children face multiple
nutrition problems including high rates of stunting and overweight, disparities in health and
nutrition status and micronutrient deficiencies (IDD and IDA). According to ADHS 2008-209,
about 39% of children 0-6 months are exclusively breastfeed. While more than half of
children 6-8 months (about 55%) received complementary food in addition to breast milk.
Overall, about 25% of breastfeed children 6-23 months are feed will all recommended IYCF
practices compared to about 11% of non-breastfed children.
The nutritional status of children has improved over the last 5 years. However, about 19% of
children under age five were stunted. Stunting was present even among children under six
months of age. Stunting indicates chronic malnutrition and is more common in mountain
region (about 28%) than in Urban Tirana and Central region; Children in lowest wealth
quintile are two times more likely to be stunted (about 13%) than those in highest quintiles
(about 27%). Wasting (too thin for height) which is a sign of acute malnutrition is about 9%.
About 5% of children under age five were underweight for their age. Twenty –two percent
of children under five were overweight.
Micronutrients are essential vitamins and minerals required for good health. About 17% of
children 6-59 months in Albania have some level of anemia. Anemia is considerable higher in
rural areas than in urban areas, for children of women with no education and for lowest
wealth quintile. Nineteen percent of women whose hemoglobin level was tested were found
to be anemic.
Taking into consideration current nutrition situation of women and children in Albania, a
new Joint Programme on Nutrition (JPN), funded by the MDGF-Spanish Government, was
developed jointly with UNICEF, WHO, FAO and the Albanian Government and will help place
nutrition and food security higher in government agenda and design interventions focusing
directly to most marginalized population groups.
1 Based on UNICEF background information. 2011
Participatory Capacity and Needs Assessment
Ch
ap
ter:
1.
Intr
od
uct
ion
9
Designing and implementation of cross sectorial interventions addressing malnutrition and
household food insecurity is an important component of the current nutrition programme.
The involvement of the community and key local stakeholders will help ensure endorsement
and validation of planned interventions, effectively mobilize the community and contribute
to sustainability of interventions.
In this context, a step wise approach was selected by the JPN’s responsible institutions,
leading to community based nutrition interventions, including:
• Identifying the key partners involved in the planning and implementation of
community nutrition program;
• Understanding the priority nutrition problems (assess nutrition situation,
understanding the priority nutrition problems and analyzing causes of malnutrition);
• Selecting the most appropriate program approach (define goals and objectives, key
program targets, choose the most appropriate intervention strategy);
• Developing the institutional framework for implementation (defining management
and programmatic roles of different partners, eliciting commitments of partners to
their roles);
• Designing and appropriate programme action plan (programme activities and time
frame for implementation, determine resources needed).
1.2. Definition and concepts of food and nutrition
security
According to the accepted definition, food security is “adequate access to food for all people
at all times for an active, healthy life”. Food is here defined as any substance that people eat
and drink to maintain life and growth, where safe and clean water is also considered as an
essential part of food commodities. As such, food security is achieved, if adequate food (in
terms of quantity, quality, safety, socio-cultural acceptability) is available and accessible for
and satisfactorily utilized by all individuals at all times to live a healthy and happy life.
This definition of food security emphasizes “availability”, “accessibility”, and “utilization” of
food. The inclusion of “utilization” underlines that “nutrition security” is more than “food
security”. Figure below shows the conceptual framework of malnutrition, developed by
UNICEF and widely accepted internationally.
Participatory Capacity and Needs Assessment
Ch
ap
ter:
1.
Intr
od
uct
ion
10
Figure 1. Conceptual framework of malnutrition (UNICEF, 1991)
People are malnourished if their diet does not provide adequate calories and protein for
growth and maintenance or they are unable to fully utilize the food they eat due to illness
(under-nutrition) or they consume too many calories (over-nutrition). Thus, there are three
basic types of malnutrition:
• The first and most important is protein-energy malnutrition - the lack of enough
protein (from meat and other sources) and food that provides energy (measured in
calories) which all of the basic food groups provide. This is the type of malnutrition
that is most often referred to when hunger is discussed.
• The second type of malnutrition, also very important, is micronutrient (vitamin and
mineral) deficiency. This is not the type of malnutrition that is referred to most often
when hunger is discussed, though it is certainly very important.
• In recent years there has also been a move to include obesity as a third form of
malnutrition. Although obesity is certainly a health problem, considering it as
malnutrition expands the previous usual meaning of the term which referred to poor
nutrition due to lack of food inputs. It is poor nutrition, but it is certainly not typically
due to a lack of calories, but rather too many (although poor food choices, often due
to poverty, are part of the problem).
Participatory Capacity and Needs Assessment
Ch
ap
ter:
1.
Intr
od
uct
ion
11
The two most commonly used conceptual frameworks (food security and malnutrition) show
significant differences. The food security framework emphasizes an economic approach in
which food as a commodity is a central focus. The malnutrition framework adopts a
biological approach in which the human being is the starting point.
Figure 2. Conceptual framework of the nutritional status at household and individual level
However, both frameworks promote an
interdisciplinary approach to ensuring “Food and
Nutrition Security” (FNS) in common. Both
acknowledge that food alone is not sufficient to
secure a sustainable satisfactory nutritional status
and, therefore, aspects of health must be
considered. As a result, nutrition at the households
and individuals level is the function of food intake
and health status, as illustrated in figure below. The
conceptual framework of “Food and Nutrition
Security” integrates the food security and the
malnutrition frameworks.
Analyzed in this framework, the overall level of knowledge and understanding of the key
regional and local authorities (health, education, agriculture and social sectors) and
communities about nutrition issues, its current situation, causes and effects is considered to
be a very important element for the improvement of the situation. However, the results of
the assessment show that the overall level of awareness, knowledge and information
available about nutrition issues (nutrition in general and especially related to children and
women) remain generally low, both at the regional, local and community level.
Figure 3. Determinants of Food and Nutrition Security
Participatory Capacity and Needs Assessment
Ch
ap
ter:
1.
Intr
od
uct
ion
12
1.3. Purpose of the study
Based on the JPN’s main development goal and approach and working in close cooperation
with the technical staff of main strategic partners in nutrition and food security
interventions, local authorities in target districts and technical officers of UN participating
agencies (UNICEF, WHO, FAO), the main purposes of this study will be to:
• Identify needs/existing gaps of community based partners (community leaders, local
service providers (health, education, agriculture, social services) and CSOs working
with communities in the target areas to design, implement and monitor nutrition and
food security interventions;
• Conduct a participatory needs assessment at community level to define community
based interventions in target areas.
• Synthetize the results of both assessments in the form of a final report including the
recommendations for trainings and the proposed package of community based
interventions.
1.4. Methodology and approach of the study
1.4.1. Overview of the approach
The approach selected for the implementation of this assignment is based mainly on the
Participatory Learning and Action (PLA) approach. The PLA helped the study team to identify
and analyze the situation and problems and identify interventions and actions for
improvement of nutrition with the involvement of community. This approach involved in
itself the use of a wide range of visual and verbal methods and tools (involving participatory
rural appraisals (PRA), rapid rural appraisals (RRA), rapid participatory appraisals (RPA),
participatory priority setting (PPS), responsibility mapping, scoring, role-plays, diagrams,
brainstorming, planning charts, etc.) to identify and analyze situation, identify priorities and
potential interventions and actions.
The implementation of the PLA approach in this assignment was based on the following
principles:
• Sequencing: It started with a wide-open process to identify key issues: starting from
the national and regional level and go down to the selected local community level;
probe issues and priorities by using appropriate RRA and PRA tools. Eventually
appropriate measures were taken to adapt the tools to the extent of the particular
phenomena at each level.
Participatory Capacity and Needs Assessment
Ch
ap
ter:
1.
Intr
od
uct
ion
13
• Adaptation and creativity: The PRA tools were adapted according to the purpose
and particular phenomena at each level (avoiding the danger of “methods fixation”)
and considering first what issues the community has identified, and/or subjects the
assessment team needed information on or probing certain issues in more depth.
• Reversal of learning: Learn directly from the local community, gaining from their
local physical, technical and social knowledge.
• Triangulating information and results: The team used learning and triangulation
from several methods, disciplines, individuals or groups, locations and/or types of
information, cross-checking, comparing and verifying the information and results.
• Seeking diversity: This was an important element ensuring that the diverse
information, judgments, views and concerns of all the different groups within the
community have been heard and analyzed and that the diversity within any
community, economic or well-being categories, gender, age, were duly taken into
consideration.
• Sharing: Ideas and information are shared between the local people, between the
local people and the facilitators and of experiences between different communities,
institutions and organizations involved in the implementation this assessment.
1.4.2. A step-wise implementation approach
Phase I: Identification and selection of targeted area
This phase was supported by the UNICEF/WHO/FAO during the first half of 2011 and
included discussions with key community actors and technical staff at the ministries of
Health and Agriculture on selection of the target communes for these interventions. Several
regional workshops were organized by the JPN team respectively on May 2011 in the three
selected regions. As a result of these identification and planning workshops, it was agreed
on the selection of 15 communes for nutrition interventions, as follows:
• Kukes region - communes Shishtavec, Zapod, Topojan and Bicaj in Kukes district, the
commune of Golaj in Has district and communes of Tropoje e Vjeter and Bujan in
Tropoja district;
• Shkodra region - communes of Bushat, Rrethina in Shkoder district, communes of
Kastrat and Gruemire in Malesi e Madhe district and the Puka municipality and the
commune of Iballe in Puka district;
• Tirana region - municipality of Kamez and the commune of Paskuqan.
The selection of these local government units (communes/municipalities) was based on
socioeconomic status, malnutrition rates, geographical access, remoteness, level of
engagement of local authorities and receptiveness for intervention.
Participatory Capacity and Needs Assessment
Ch
ap
ter:
1.
Intr
od
uct
ion
14
Phase II: Implementation of the assessment
This phase was implemented by the PfD, with the information, data collection and meetings
held period October-November 2011 and the data processing, analyzing and the report
writing during December 2011. As relevantly proposed by the Joint Programme on Nutrition,
a step wise approach was selected for the implementation of this assessment, starting with
the analyses and understating of the national -> regional -> local -> community nutrition
situation, problems and priorities, leading then to identification of appropriate community
based nutrition interventions.
More specifically, the approach included the following main steps:
1. Reviewing of existing data: The team started with the review of the existing background
information and data on nutritional status of women and children in Albania and better
understand and become familiar with current situation and main objectives of
Government of Albania and partners agencies on nutrition and food security issues.
2. Identification of key partners: This step built on the results and findings of the previous
step and involved meetings and interviews with several representatives of key national
and regional institutions/organizations, aiming to identify more in details their roles and
responsibilities, their involvement in planning and implementation of nutrition and food
security programs, identify the key potential partners at each of the levels that would be
necessary to be involved in further steps of the assessment and potentially later in the
field implementation of the programme.
3. Data/information collection: (i) to assess the overall nutrition situation and needs of the
target communities; (ii) to assess the capacities of key partners involved in the planning
and implementation of community nutrition programs. In order to have a
comprehensive information and a clear picture on the current nutrition situation in the
target areas, and in order to be able design and undertake effective interventions in the
future for the improvement of nutrition in these regions, the assessment team used a
set of various instruments, including individual interviews and testimonials and focus
group discussions using open-ended questionnaires. Focus groups have been held with
three main target groups of stakeholders, as follows:
o Local authority actors, with stakeholders at regional level (Qark) and at local
government level (communes/municipalities);
o Local community, with community groups (families and family groups) and;
o Civil society actors, including NGOs, associations, independent experts, etc.
A specific open-ended questionnaire per each stakeholder category was developed and
used for collection of information and data during the focus group discussions and
Participatory Capacity and Needs Assessment
Ch
ap
ter:
1.
Intr
od
uct
ion
15
meetings held during this period. Besides the numerous individual meetings with
representatives of various institutions, organizations and individual experts, 63 focus
groups consisting of about 10-15 members each (or about 760 persons attending these
focus groups) were held with the abovementioned stakeholders. The table below
presents the distribution of focus groups according to the targeted regions.
Table 1. Number and distribution of focus groups held with key stakeholders
Kukes
region
Shkoder
region
Tirana
region
Total
Regional and local government level 8 7 3 18
Community level 14 12 4 30
Civil society actors 7 6 2 15
Total 29 25 9 63
The number of questionnaires per region was determined mainly based on number of
communes/municipalities preselected for the assessment and on the importance of the
nutrition and food security issues (resulting from the bibliographic review made during
the first step of the assessment). These questionnaires focused mainly on the following:
o At the local authority level (regions & communes): (i) how do the local
authorities perceive the nutrition situation in their territory; (ii) does local
government have any plans and capacities to promote and implement
interventions for the improvement of nutrition situation in their territory; (iii)
what is the level of coordination between various actors/sectors at local level to
analyze, orient, plan and implement interventions targeting nutrition issues in
their territory; (iv) what are the major constraints in the current food security
situation (food production and procurement), resources and opportunities for
increase in quality and variety of food products and improve food security in their
territory; etc.
o At the local community level (families and family groups): (i) how much do
community members know about nutrition concept, causes and effects (in
particular related to children nutrition); (ii) what are the main potential,
opportunities and necessary actions to increase the quality and variety of
production at local level in order to improve their households’ nutrition and food
security situation; (iii) which are the possibilities to introduce new and improved
products and production approaches, technologies and system (in crop and
livestock production, use of forest fruits and herbs, improved post-harvest and
processing practices, etc.); (iv) which could be the most effective ways, tools and
instruments to improve the level of information, knowledge and increase
awareness on the nutrition and food security issues; etc.
Participatory Capacity and Needs Assessment
Ch
ap
ter:
1.
Intr
od
uct
ion
16
o At civil society level and independent experts: (i) what are the most important
elements, tools, instruments that would need to changed, introduced or
improved in order to improve the situation; (ii) which could be the most effective
types instruments or interventions that would need to in the future; (iii) which
could be the most active and efficient actors to be involved in the
implementation of future interventions; (iv) which could be the most effective
instruments to be used for improving the community information and awareness
level on nutrition and food security issues; (v) which categories of products are
most limited in the usual/traditional diet; (vi) what are the resources and
opportunities available for improvement of the nutrition and food security
situation within their territories; etc.
4. Data processing and analysis: The data collected through the interviews and focus
groups consisted of mainly qualitative data. It’s processing and analysis was made mainly
by use of standardized Excel data analyzing tools (formulas, PivotTables and
PivotCharts). The use such tools for the qualitative data processing and analysis has
passed through the five main steps, as follows: (i) data consolidation; (ii) identification of
themes and patterns (ideas, concepts, behaviors, interactions, incidents, terminology or
phrases used); (iii) identify linkages and organize of the data in various categories; (iv)
assess the relative importance to each of the categories, scoring and identify
relationships and dependences; and (v) synthetize and bring meaning to the text through
the production and use of tables and figures. The data analysis and reporting is made by
presenting the results according to the main assessment topics/issues and according to
the three main categories of stakeholders. In addition, within each of the topic/issue, the
analysis tends to show as clear as possible the differences between various regions and
local communities.
In order to be able to analyze and present the data on comparative basis we have use a
scoring system (3=high; 2=moderate; 1=low; 0=none) for the main issues which was then
used for presentations of these issues on radar charts. The scoring was done based on
following approaches: (i) first during the discussions, participants in the meetings from
local authorities, civil society actors and community were asked to assess the main issues
raised based on their own judgment on the above scale from 3 to 0; (ii) the most
important issues were scored independently by the various categories of actors (local
authorities, civil society actors and community); (iii) during the processing of the
information collected through the questionnaires, our experts assessed the frequency of
repetition of a certain issue and allocated the respective score. This process in three
independent steps allowed a triangulation approach and improved of the final results.
Participatory Capacity and Needs Assessment
Ch
ap
ter:
2.
Ma
in f
ind
ing
s o
f th
e s
tud
y
17
2. MAIN FINDINGS OF THE STUDY
2.1. Overview of the study area
The study area included 15 local government units (LGUs) in three regions (7 in Kukes, 6 in
Shkoder and 2 in Tirana). The targeted areas cover a total area of 1.430 Km2 and have about
37.600 hectares of arable land. The 15 targeted LGUs have a population of about 153
thousand inhabitants and about 35,200 households. An important characteristic of these
areas, especially in Kukes (Kukes, Has and Tropoja districts) and some of the areas in
Shkodra regions (in the district Puka and Malesi e Madhe), is that the majority of their
territory is highly mountainous, located in more than 600m of altitude and having a slope of
more than 15%, which creates significant difficulties for the development of many
agriculture production activities (especially crop production). The table below presents the
main characteristics of targeted local government units.
Table 2. Main characteristics of the targeted study area Total
Area
(in Km2)
Arable
land
(in Ha)
Population
(according to
2001 Census)
Households
(according to
2001 Census)
% of Area
at >600m
altitude
% of Area
with >15%
slope
Kukes 826.17 12,478.60 29,738 6,387
Bicaj 79.28 1,179.10 7,022 1,516 37.89 61.92
Bujan 167.53 1,677.50 3,297 713 17.32 61.88
Golaj 167.13 3,396.50 1,649 269 25.36 44.87
Shishtavec 65.97 942.00 5,871 1,343 99.97 83.32
Topojan 80.21 960.60 3,561 578 99.86 91.55
Tropoje 228.95 3,834.20 5,381 1,300 34.87 65.94
Zapod 37.11 488.70 2,957 668 89.79 98.33
Shkoder 565.45 22,152.30 58,046 14,250
Bushat 81.68 5,689.50 17,185 4,232 - 3.11
Gruemire 106.52 5,410.20 9,796 2,454 0.09 13.92
Iballe 145.15 1,332.80 2,689 659 72.31 69.61
Kastrat 150.88 5,410.10 8,460 2,023 17.11 17.48
Puke 25.60 353.30 4,579 1,097 77.27 61.86
Rrethine 55.63 3,956.40 15,337 3,785 - 1.72
Tirana 37.69 3,005.80 65,498 14,555
Kamez 23.48 2,119.70 44,443 10,010 - 0.01
Paskuqan 14.21 886.10 21,055 4,545 - 9.01
Grand total 1,429.32 37,636.70 153,282 35,192
Source: INSTAT (for area and population); MADA 2011 (for altitude and slope)
Participatory Capacity and Needs Assessment
Ch
ap
ter:
2.
Ma
in f
ind
ing
s o
f th
e s
tud
y
18
The Kukes region has a total area of about 2,374 km2 organized in three districts (Kukes, Has
and Tropoja), 3 municipalities and 24 communes. With its terrain going from 257m-2175m
of altitude, it is considered as highly mountainous. The majority of the area is covered with
forests and pastures (occupying about 156,140ha) while only about and 25,295ha are arable
land (or only about 10% of total area of the region). The waterfront areas (lakes and
reservoirs) occupy 8200 ha. The region has a population of about 111,393 in about 23,050
families, with a population density of about 47 inhabitants per square kilometer. About 80%
of this population lives in rural areas and is directly linked to agriculture and livestock
activities. The targeted area in this region includes 7 communes, with a total population of
about 29,738 inhabitants and 6,387 households. Almost all these communes are highly
mountainous with their majority of land located above 600m of altitude (especially
Shishtavec, Zapod and Topojan have more than 90% of their territory above 600m), and with
located in more than 15% slope.
The Shkodra region includes 3 districts (Shkodra, Puka and Malesia e Madhe), 5
municipalities and 29 communes. The region has a total area of 3,372 km2 (of which about
68,560 ha are arable land) and a population of about 256,000 inhabitants and about 62,720
households (with a population density of about 76 inhabitants per km²). The highest density
of the region is at the district of Shkodra with 94 inhabitants per km². The population living
in rural areas varies from about 53.7% of the population in Shkodra district, to respectively
89% and 82% in Puke and Malesi e Madhe. About half of the territory of the region is
situated in hilly and mountain areas with significant limitation in production of several
agriculture products. The study area in this region consists of 5 communes and 1
municipality with a total area of about population of 565 km2 and a total population of
about 56,046 inhabitants (about 14,250 households). Within the targeted area, communes
of Iballe (Puke), municipality of Puke and to some extent the commune of Kastrat (Malesi e
Madhe) are the most mountainous areas, while the rest of the targeted area is flatter and
has better agriculture production conditions.
The Region of Tirana includes Tirana and Kavaja districts and has a total area of about 1,586
km² and a total arable land area of about 55,497 ha. The population of this region reaches a
number of 966,000 inhabitants (with a density of about 364 inhabitants per km²), living in
about 233,230 households. About 75% of its population lives in urban and sub-urban areas
while only about 25% in rural one. The study area in this region includes the Kamza
municipality and the Paskuqan commune, representing about total area about 38 km2, (of
which about 3,000 ha are arable land) and a total population of about 65,498 inhabitants
living in about 14,556 households. Both of these local government units are considered as
mainly urban and sub-urban area.
Participatory Capacity and Needs Assessment
Ch
ap
ter:
2.
Ma
in f
ind
ing
s o
f th
e s
tud
y
19
2.2. Awareness and knowledge on food and nutrition
security concepts
2.2.1. Level of knowledge of FNS concepts at local authority level
The highest level of knowledge and understanding on the subject was shows within the
health sector specialists, most of which could make (during the interviews and focus group
discussions) a dissent description of malnutrition and its causes and effects on the
population. Scored in a level from 3 (high level of knowledge/understanding) to 0 (none),
the health sector seems to reach an aggregated score of almost 2 (moderate level), with a
higher knowledge and understanding of the subject at the regional level, possibly due to
participation in recent training activities supported by the JPN, as compared to the local one.
While the majority of participants from the three other sectors seem to have significantly
lower level of knowledge and awareness on the subject, with social sector having an
aggregated scoring of 1 out 3, education sector 0.93 and the lowest on being the agriculture
sector with an aggregated score of 0.87 out of 3. The figures below present the aggregated
scores for each key sector according to the targeted regions.
Figure 4. Aggregated scoring of key actors’ knowledge and understanding of key actors on malnutrition
Note: 3 (high level of knowledge/understanding); 2 (moderate); 1 (low); 0 (none)
Participatory Capacity and Needs Assessment
Ch
ap
ter:
2.
Ma
in f
ind
ing
s o
f th
e s
tud
y
20
Within the three regions, participants from the four key actors from Tirana seem to be more
aware of and have a relatively higher level of knowledge and understanding of nutrition
than their respective counterparts in the other regions. However, in the three regions,
almost the same picture was identified, with the health sector being the most informed.
Table 3. The level of local authorities’ knowledge about concepts and components of food security and malnutrition
Kukes Shkoder Tirana He Ag So Ed He Ag So Ed He Ag So Ed
1)Overall food security concept h m m m h m m m h m m m
2) Components of food security:
2.a) Food availability m m L m m m L m h m L m
2.b) Food accessibility L L m L L L m L L L m L
2.c) Food utilization m L L L h L L L h L L L
2.d) Stability L L L L L - L L L L L L
3) Overall concept of malnutrition h L L L h L L m h L L m
4) Types of malnutrition:
4.a) lack of proteins and energy h L L L h L L L h L L L
4.b) lack of vitamins and
micronutrients - - - - - - - - L - - -
4.c) other issues (such as
unbalanced feeding, obesity, etc) L - L - L - L - L L L -
5) Differences-Food security/Nutrition L - - - L - - - L - - -
Legend: “He”-health sector; “Ag”-agriculture sector; “So”-social sector; “Ed”-education sector;
“h”-high; “m”-medium; “L”-low; “-“ none or very low (insignificant)
The table above presents a summary of the major characteristics of the knowledge and
understanding that regional and local authorities have about various components/aspects
related to food security and malnutrition. As it may be seen from this table, the majority of
sectors in the three regions have generally a much better knowledge and understanding
about the overall concept of food security than of the malnutrition concept. Within the food
security, most of the actors know better the food availability aspects, while almost all show
a very limited understanding on issues related to the stability (of access and availability). In
addition, often many of them have difficulties making the difference between the food
availability and food accessibility.
The majority of the health specialists have a good overall understanding about both food
security and malnutrition. Within the food security components they seem to know better
issues related to food availability and food utilization than food accessibility and stability
issues. When asked about the types of malnutrition, , they seem to have a high level of
understanding of the overall malnutrition concept, and especially the type of malnutrition
related to the lack of proteins, vitamins and energy. They define malnutrition with
expression such as “not taking the main elements - carbohydrates, vitamins, fat and proteins
{Gruemire, Shkoder}”, “taking too much of these elements {Bushat, Shkoder}” and “having
Participatory Capacity and Needs Assessment
Ch
ap
ter:
2.
Ma
in f
ind
ing
s o
f th
e s
tud
y
21
and unbalanced intake of these elements”, “lack necessary food items for a health body
{Bicaj, Kukes}”, “eating but not feeding the body {Iballe, Shkoder}”, etc. Most of key food
elements were mentioned (however, none them mentioned the “microelements” as part of
the necessary food intake. In certain cases, especially in Kukes and Shkoder, some of the
health specialist (mostly from local level) linked the women and child malnutrition with their
limited dressing and accommodation conditions and with the household assets. A nurse in
Shkoder declared “a good nutrition for a future mother means not only a good feeding but
also appropriate accommodation conditions, dessing, good health advice by the local nurses
and doctors, etc”..
The three other sectors (agriculture, social and education) seem to have almost the same
level (moderate) of knowledge and understanding about the overall food security concept.
However they seem to differ about the understanding of components of the food security.
While agriculture and education seem to know at moderate level the food availability issues
(“to have or produce enough food for the year {Shishtavec, Kukes}”, “secure the bread for the
family {Zapod, Kukes}”, etc.) the social sector seems to reach that level on the food
accessibility issues (“ensure money to buy additional food supply in the market {Kukes}”,
“have the possibility to go to the market {Kukes}”, “a steady supply of food through the local
shops {Shkoder}”, “have less food than is needed to feed the family members” {Iballe,
Shkoder}”, etc.), most probably because their work is more linked with accessibility. As
regards food utilization and stability aspects the three sectors show only a low level of
knowledge (with Shkodra agriculture sector showing a very low/insignificant level).
As regards the malnutrition, the three sectors show a moderate to low level of knowledge.
Most of them link malnutrition almost only to protein-energy deficiencies and a few cases to
obesity, especially from the social sector (with no reference to micronutrient deficiencies).
In addition, malnutrition is often broadly described as “diseases” {Bicaj, Kukes}, “anemia”
{Bujan, Kukes}, “lack of fat, proteins, calories” {Tropoje, Kukes}, “a poor food diet lacking
main elements” {Kastrate, Shkoder}, etc. In Shkodra and Tirana, the level of awareness on
obesity issues seems to be introduced. In this respect, a teacher in Shkodra declared that
“even in the better-off families there problems with malnutrition of children, due to the lack
of awareness and information of good nutrition practices they give children too much fast-
foods and potato-chips (patatina), which are bad for their health”.
When speaking about conceptual differences between nutrition and food security, with the
exception of some of the participants from the health sector, the majority of the other
participants seemed to have difficulties in stating the differences and tend to confuse and
often equal the two concepts.
When asked about the knowledge on the effects of the malnutrition, a large number of
participants from the local authorities seemed to have a general good understanding.
However they presented a general concern about the community awareness on the effects
Participatory Capacity and Needs Assessment
Ch
ap
ter:
2.
Ma
in f
ind
ing
s o
f th
e s
tud
y
22
malnutrition. The main concerns in this regard seem to be represented by the following
expressions: “most parents are not ware about how malnutrition affects the psycho-motor
development of their children”, “the population does not have sufficient information about
malnutrition effects”, “access to information and medical services is difficult due to the
remoteness and long geographical distances between families” “we need more information
given in a simple way (reference is made to small brochure and leaflets)”, “most appropriate
persons to inform population on malnutrition effects to children are health workers
(particularly village nurses that meet more often mothers) and school teachers”, etc. In
addition, several representatives of the local authorities in Shkoder insisted that it is very
important to distribute brief/simple documentary materials on child nutrition through
schools, kindergartens, health centers and meetings with targeted parents presenting more
food security and nutrition risks. The table below presents the key topics identified as
important (according to authorities and regions) to be covered by any potential capacity
building intervention to improve the awareness, knowledge and understanding on food
security and nutrition issues at the level of local authorities.
Table 4. Main topics proposed to be covered by potential capacity building interventions at local authority level for improving knowledge on food security and nutrition concepts
Topics Kukes Shkoder Tirana
He Ag So Ed He Ag So Ed He Ag So Ed
Knowledge on overall food security
concept * ** ** ** * ** ** ** * ** ** **
Improving food availability (new types
of local productions) ** *** *** ** ** ** *** ** ** ** *** **
Improving food accessibility *** *** ** *** *** *** ** *** *** *** ** ***
Improving food utilization (better use
of local products, improve diet
composition, new types of dishes, etc.)
* *** *** *** ** *** *** *** ** *** *** ***
Improving food stability (post-harvest
practices, conservation, etc.) ** *** ** *** ** *** ** *** ** *** ** ***
Understanding types of malnutrition * *** *** *** * *** *** *** * *** *** **
Understanding differences-food
security/nutrition ** *** *** *** ** *** *** *** ** *** *** ***
Principles and practices of good
nutrition ** *** *** *** ** *** *** *** ** *** *** ***
Diet composition and food nutrients ** *** *** *** ** *** *** *** ** *** *** *** High nutritious food products *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** Rapid assessment/identification of
food security issues * *** ** *** ** *** ** *** ** *** ** **
Rapid assessment/identification of
nutrition issues ** ** ** *** ** ** ** *** * ** ** **
Legend: “He”-health sector; “Ag”-agriculture sector; “So”-social sector; “Ed”-education sector;
“***” identified as very important, “**” somewhat important, “*” less important,
Participatory Capacity and Needs Assessment
Ch
ap
ter:
2.
Ma
in f
ind
ing
s o
f th
e s
tud
y
23
2.2.2. Level of community knowledge on nutrition concepts
As shown in the figures below, the same general tendency seems to be valid also at the
community level. Almost all community representatives in the three regions declared that
nutrition is a very important element for the development and a healthy growth of their
children. However, through the various discussions about nutrition issues, we come to the
conclusion that most of the community participants (household representatives) in the focus
groups know only moderately to low about the concept of the nutrition. However, many of
them seem to confuse the composition of the diet composition with the quantity of food
intake, while the majority of the community participants could not really distinguish
differences between the nutrition and food security concepts.
Figure 5. Level of overall community awareness on nutrition issues
The table below presents a summary of the major characteristics of the knowledge and
understanding that community seems to have about concepts and types of malnutrition.
The majority of communities seem to have a relatively moderate understanding about the
overall malnutrition concept, with four communities (Topojan, Kastrat, Gruemire and Iballe)
presenting a low level and one (Zapod, Kukes) very low level of knowledge and
understanding on the subject. However, almost all of them understand malnutrition only
linked with the protein-energy deficiencies, while other types of malnutrition seem
difficultly perceived from the respondents.
Participatory Capacity and Needs Assessment
Ch
ap
ter:
2.
Ma
in f
ind
ing
s o
f th
e s
tud
y
24
Table 5. The level of community knowledge about concept and types of malnutrition
Kukes Shkoder Tirana
Shis
hta
ve
c
To
po
jan
Za
po
d
Bic
aj
Tro
po
je V
j.
Bu
jan
Go
laj
Ka
stra
t
Gru
em
ira
Rre
thin
a
Bu
sha
t
Iba
lla
Pu
ke
Ka
me
z
Pa
sku
qa
n
1) Overall concept of
malnutrition m L vL m m m m L L m m L m mH mH
2) Types of malnutrition:
2.a) limited use of food
products rich in energy
and proteins
mL vL - m mL m mL L L m m vL m m m
2.b) limited use of food
products rich in vitamins
and micronutrient
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
2.c) use of unbalanced
food (i.e. too much fat,
carboihidrates, etc.,)
vL - - L vL L vL - - L L - L L L
3) Differences-Food
security/Nutrition - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Legend: “mH”-moderate to high; “m”-moderate; “mL”-moderate to low; “L”-low;
“vL”-very low; “-“ none
Few of the community participants from Kukes often referred to the nutrition with the food
security-like expressions, such as “I have secured the bread (or the food) for the winter”
{Zapod, Kukes}, “being able to eating at your will” {Shishtavec, Kukes}, “lack of common
(meaning basic) food item” {Zapod, Kukes}, “lack of the necessary quantity and quality of
food for the family” {Bicaj, Kukes}, etc. In addition, a large majority of community
participants seemed to confuse during the discussion the concepts of food content (in terms
of nutrients) and overall food quality. The level of awareness, understanding and knowledge
seems to be linked also with the remoteness of the area. Thus the lowest level was noticed
in the communes of Zapod (Kukes) Iballe (Puke) followed by Shishtavec (Kukes), while the
highest level was noticed in the commune of Bushat (Shkoder).
A better level of community understanding about nutrition was notices in urban and sub-
urban areas of Kamez (Tirana) and in some of the Shkodra region (such as Bushat, Rrethina
and Puka). Few of the community members from these areas that attended the focus groups
mentioned the case of “children eating too much fast-food” {Kamez, Tirane}, “eating
unbalanced food (meaning unbalanced in content of nutrients)” {Bushat, Shkoder}, “eating
mainly cereals, potato, bean and chees, especially during the winter” {Rrethina, Shkoder}
“eating very limited quantities of fruits and vegetables” {Puke, Shkoder} as malnutrition
cases.
Participatory Capacity and Needs Assessment
Ch
ap
ter:
2.
Ma
in f
ind
ing
s o
f th
e s
tud
y
25
When community participants were asked about “how important they think that
malnutrition is for the children and women in their community”, the majority of them tend
to agree that it remains a very important issue. The most representative expressions in this
regard are “it is an important problem for our community” {Tropoje, Kukes}, “it is important,
our children are our future and need to be better cared” {Bicaj, Kukes}, “the problem
concerns about 70% of our community” {Kastrate, Shkoder}, “several families do not take
enough care about child and women nutrition, but it is very important as it has to do with
their heath” {Bushat, Shkoder}, etc. When asked about the effects of malnutrition most
community representatives have only a broad understanding. The following are some of the
most representative expressions in this regard: “various diseases, loss of child weight,”
{Zapod, Kukes}, “anemia, reduction of ability to work” {Shishtavec, Kukes}, “weak health
situation, more family costs for health and thus more impoverishment” {Kastrat, Shkoder},
“increase death prevalence, more health problems for the new generation” {Iballe,
Shkoder}, etc.
The table below presents the key topics identified as important (according to communities)
to be covered by any potential capacity building intervention to improve the awareness,
knowledge and understanding on nutrition issues at the community level.
Table 6. Main topics proposed for interpersonal communication interventions at community level for improving knowledge on nutrition concepts
Kukes Shkoder Tirana
Shis
hta
vec
To
po
jan
Za
po
d
Bic
aj
Tro
po
je V
j.
Bu
jan
Go
laj
Ka
stra
t
Gru
em
ira
Rre
thin
a
Bu
sha
t
Iba
lla
Pu
ke
Ka
me
z
Pa
sku
qa
n
Improving the
overall concept and
types of
malnutrition
** *** *** ** ** ** ** *** *** ** ** *** ** ** **
Understanding
differences-food
security/nutrition
** *** *** ** ** ** ** *** *** ** ** *** ** ** **
Importance of
micronutrient in
food intake
*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
Principles and
practices of good
nutrition
*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
Diet composition
and food nutrients *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
Improving food
utilization (better
use of local
products, improve
diet composition,
new types of dishes,
ect.)
*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
Legend: “***” identified as very important, “**” somewhat important, “*” less important,
Participatory Capacity and Needs Assessment
Ch
ap
ter:
2.
Ma
in f
ind
ing
s o
f th
e s
tud
y
26
2.3. Main factors of malnutrition and food insecurity
Local authorities: The key regional and local authority actors seem perceive and describe
the main causes of food security and malnutrition within three main groups (ranked in order
of importance as presented by the participants):
• factors related to overall community development level;
• factors related to the level of community education and information; and
• other objective reasons not directly linked with the community but more with the
overall social, economic and political environment.
The table below summarizes the main factors grouped according to the three main
categories above and the main food security components.
Table 7. Main factors impacting food security and nutrition in the study area
Community development
factors Community education
and information Other objective
reasons
Food Availability
Local production
Production of traditional products, tradition and inefficient production
systems, limited productivity, aging agriculture labor {Kukes and Shkoder}
Lack of knowledge and inefficient use of local
products; lack knowledge and information on new
potential products {especially in Kukes}
Difficult agroecological conditions, limited farm and poor quality land,
high input prices, limited access to credit for investments {Kukes
and Shkoder}
Importing capacity Limited market actors in
remote rural areas {especially Kukes}
Food stock
Traditional and inefficient storage and stocking practices {Kukes and
Shkoder}
Lack of knowledge on improved storing/stocking
practices (resulting on high seasonality of
available local products)
Limited access to finance/credit for
investments {all areas}
Food aid
Very limited and ineffective food aid
distribution {especially in remote communities
of Kukes} Accessibility
Purchasing power Limited cash available to
procure additional food when needed {all areas}
Limited bargaining power compared to
food traders {all areas}
Incomes
Limited professional skills, lack of cooperation to
improve access to markets for their products {especially in Kukes but also few areas
of Shkoder}
Limited knowledge and information on potential
markets for specific local products to increase incomes from sales
{especially in Kukes}
Limited job opportunities,
especially in rural areas {Kukes Shkoder}
Market and transport infrastructure
Limited market infrastructure and poor quality of rural
roads {especially in remote areas of Kukes}
Poor quality of rural infrastructure
{especially in remote areas of Kukes}
Participatory Capacity and Needs Assessment
Ch
ap
ter:
2.
Ma
in f
ind
ing
s o
f th
e s
tud
y
27
Stability
Climate change
Limited knowledge and capacity to adapt their production system to
climate changes {especially in Shkoder}
Lack of advice and support to adapt to climate changes
{Kukes and Shkoder}
Price changes
Limited capacity to reduce risk and benefit from
seasonal price changes (fluctuations) {Kukes and
Shkoder}
Limited knowledge on how to reduce risk and increase benefits from
climate fluctuations {Kukes and Shkoder}
Political factors
Effectiveness of policies, support
measures, economic aid and other public interventions {Kukes
and Shkoder}
Economic factors
Limited non-agriculture income generating activities, poverty level {especially in
Kukes and Shkoder}
Weak overall economic environment and
business development, especially in rural areas
limiting economic opportunities {all areas}
Stability
Food safety
Use of traditional practices, not always safe
{all areas}
Food processing & handling practices and hygiene
High losses due to traditional and inefficient post
harvesting practices {Kukes and Shkoder}
Limited knowledge on improved post harvesting,
handling and food processing practices {Kukes and Shkoder}
Limited access to information on
improved technologies and credit for
investments {all areas}
Quality and variety of diet
Poor quality of nutrition due to use of traditional diets and cooking practices {all areas}
Limited knowledge on improved food diet
composition, seasonality of diet types {all areas}
Figure 6. Main causes of malnutrition as perceived by the local authority representatives
As we may see from the figure below, there may be identified various groups based on what
representatives of local authority representatives see as main factors causing of
malnutrition issues in their areas:
1. The most remote communes (Topojan, Zapod, Shishtavec and Iballe) where the three
groups of factors are considered as very important. In most of these households there
seem to be: very limited food production due to difficult soil and agro-ecological
Participatory Capacity and Needs Assessment
Ch
ap
ter:
2.
Ma
in f
ind
ing
s o
f th
e s
tud
y
28
conditions; limited farm size and poor quality of soil; limited knowledge on new and
improved agriculture and food production techniques and technologies; limited types
and varieties of food products used, and as a result; generally a very poor diet (especially
during the winter);
2. The group of communes (Rrethina
Tropoje e Vjeter, Paskuqan, Bujan
and Gruemire) declaring the
community development factors as
highly important causes followed
with moderate to low importance
for other factors (especially the
lifestyle and the traditional way of
composing the usual dies);
3. The group of communes (Bushat,
Kastrat, Kamez, Puke and Golaj),
reasonably considering that (as
they have relatively good
agriculture and food production
conditions) the objective reasons
are only of low importance as
causes of malnutrition in the areas
while considering the community
development and education and
information factors as moderately
important.
Local Community: At this level, analyzed according to the main food security component we
distinguish the following tendencies:
• Food Availability: The three regions seem to correlate to the issues related to the
local production issues and rank them as most important. Here they stress mainly
“limited available farm land”, “limited productivity”, “limited access and use of inputs
and improved technologies”, “use of traditional and inefficient production systems”
etc. Limited food production opportunities seems to be of a higher importance as
cause of malnutrition household food insecurity risks in Kukes region and especially
in remote areas. Despite the limited agriculture production conditions, even in
remote areas (such as Shishtavec, Topojan, Zapod and Iballe) the majority of the
community participants seem to put forward more issues linked to limited
knowledge about nutrition. Food stock seems to more of a problem in Tirana as
compared to the two other regions. Food aid issues seem important especially for
Figure 7. Main causes of malnutrition according to three main groups factors, as perceives by local authorities
Participatory Capacity and Needs Assessment
Ch
ap
ter:
2.
Ma
in f
ind
ing
s o
f th
e s
tud
y
29
the remote areas of Kukes (Shishtavec, Zapod and Topojan) and the plain area of
Shkodra (Bushat and Rrethina, which may be linked with the food situation that
happened during the last years), while importing capacity (bringing food products to
local area from abroad or other areas within the country) seem to be more important
in the rural remote areas of Kukes (mainly due to the lack of traders going to these
areas). While availability seems steadier in Tirana, seasonal availability is a major
characteristic in almost all Kukes and Shkodra regions. “We have difficulties to ensure
sufficient food for the whole year” {Iballe, Shkoder}, “we have enough food products
in harvesting season and often lack major food items in the winter” {Gruemire,
Shkoder}.
• Food Accessibility in the three areas seems to be linked mainly with the low incomes
available and the limited purchasing power. The market and infrastructure factor
seem to be more important for the remote rural areas of Kukes. This is especially
important in Shishtavec, Zapod and Topojan. Few of them declare: “even when we
have some money, out local shop has limited food items that we may buy, and they
are very expensive due to the distance and the bad road”. {Shishtavec, Kukes}, “our
trader is also poor like us so he has not the financial capacity to bring here a lot of
food items, and they are usually of low quality” {Iballe, Shkoder}.
• Food Stability: In the three regions, issues seem to be more linked with the economic
factors (mainly due to the poverty, low local economic and business development
situation, especially in Kukes) and price changes (mainly due to the limited,
knowledge, information and capacity of the community to reduce risk and benefit
from the price fluctuations. “We are poor and for sure we eat poor, even when we
have we don’t know how to use it” {Zapod, Kukes}, “we may produce only during a
short production season and this is not enough to feed the family during the whole
year” {Topojan, Kukes}, “our incomes are not enough to buy additional food in the
market, besides few things such as oil, sugar, salt, etc.”, {Gruemire, Shkoder}.
• Food utilization issues seem to be linked mainly with the limited capacities of the
local community and use of traditional practices in processing and handling of food
products and with the poor quality and limited variety of food diets used. The
following expressions represent a sample of such concerns: “during the summer we
have a lot of fruits which are spoiled of feed to animals and in the winter we don’t
eat any of them” {Iballe, Shkoder}, “even during the summer when we have more
products we don’t know what is better for the children” {Topojan, Kukes}, “many
mothers don’t know to prepare healthy food for their children even when they have
enough food item at home” (Gruemire, Shkoder}, “often women are too engaged
farm labor or caring for animals and don’t care enough for the quality of food in
terms of nutrition” {Tropoje, Kukes}.
Participatory Capacity and Needs Assessment
Ch
ap
ter:
2.
Ma
in f
ind
ing
s o
f th
e s
tud
y
30
Figure 8. Main causes of malnutrition and food insecurity as perceives by community representatives according to the four main food security components
2.4. Local government capacities in dealing with FNS and
coordination issues
The current role of the local government administration in dealing with the nutrition and
food security issues remains very limited throughout the study area. As declared by the local
governments represented met of those attending the focus group meeting, none of the local
governments have nutrition or local food security management plans and none of them
seems to have undertaken significant analysis of the on these issues (with the exception of
the management and distribution of the social assistance payments).
When asked about their capacity to deal with issues like monitoring and reporting the food
and nutrition security (FNS) situation in their territory and plan and management of FNS
interventions, almost all local government representatives accord that their capacities are
generally very low or not existent. The table below presents the results of the participatory
weighting level of their declared capacities, by communes/municipalities and aggregated
average at the study areas.
Participatory Capacity and Needs Assessment
Ch
ap
ter:
2.
Ma
in f
ind
ing
s o
f th
e s
tud
y
31
Figure 9. Weighted level of LG capacities to deal with FNS issues at their territory
Some experience and capacities in monitoring and reporting and management of FNS
interventions seem to exist in the better off communes and municipalities (such as Kamez,
Paskuqan, Puke, Bushat, Rrethina, Bujan, Tropoje e Vjeter and Bicaj) mainly due to the
cooperation with any donor funded initiatives in their areas and the any demand for
information from central institutions (mainly from Ministry of Health). However, only local
government representatives from Bushat, Rrethina and Bicaj declared to have some
capacities and little previous experience in planning food security interventions in this field
(due to interventions in the context of few donor funded projects).
The coordination of efforts between various local authority actors seems to be a major issue
in the three regions. The heath sector is almost the only local actor some better quality
collecting data on nutrition (but still at operative level and not statistics) and reports them
to the Ministry of Health. The agriculture sector collects operational data on production and
sometimes about the imported food products and reports them to the Ministry of
Agriculture. The social and education sectors seem not to be involved at all in any data
collection of reporting related to food security and nutrition issues at local level. As various
sectors (health and agriculture that collect some data) report directly to their respective
ministries and the very low level of local coordination between the sectors, the information
available to the local government remains very scarce.
The table below presents more in details issues identified regarding the actual capacities of
local government to deal food and nutrition security.
Participatory Capacity and Needs Assessment
Ch
ap
ter:
2.
Ma
in f
ind
ing
s o
f th
e s
tud
y
32
Table 8. The assessment of the current experience and capacities of LG (according to main identified capacity issues)
Kukes Shkoder Tirana
Shi
shta
vec
Top
ojan
Zap
od
Bic
aj
Tro
poje
Vj.
Buj
an
Gol
aj
Kas
trat
Gru
emira
Rre
thin
a
Bus
hat
Ibal
la
Puk
e
Kam
ez
Pas
kuqa
n
Knowledge and experience in planning • assessment of FS
situation - - - vL - - - - - vL m - - - -
• assessment of nutrition situation
- - - - - - - - - - L - - - -
• preparation of intervention plans
- - - vL - - - - - vL m - - m vL
Knowledge and experience in management • Implementation of
intervention plans - - - vL vL vL - - - vL vL - vL vL vL
• coordination of multidisciplinary teams
- - - L vL vL - vL L L H - L m L
• implementation of community based actions
- - - vL - - - vL vL - m - vL vL -
• implementation of FS actions
- - - vL - vL - - vL - m - L L -
• Implementation of nutrition actions
- - - - - - - - - - vL - - - -
Knowledge and experience in monitoring & reporting
• collection of FS data - - - - - - - vL vL L m - m L vL • collection of nutrition
data - - - - - - - - - - vL - vL vL -
• processing of FNS data - - - - - - - - vL - m - m m vL
• preparation of reports vL - - vL vL vL vL - - H H - m m vL
Legend: “H”- high; “m”-moderate; “L”-low; “vL”-very low; “-“none
When asked about what could be done to improve coordination and capacities to deal with
food security and nutrition, the following recommendations seem to be the most often:
• Improve cross-sectorial coordination between local actors in collection and exchange
of information and development of joint action plans for improvement of the
situation;
• Determination of a local reference point (institution or person) to arrange for an
effective coordination between actors (local and central ones). This experience exists
in the areas that has emergencies (like flooding in Shkoder) and may be used to build
more permanent and stable coordination mechanisms even in no-emergent
situations;
• Establishment of an office/structure within the local government administration to
deal with food security and nutrition issues at local and community level;
• The economic aid may be distributed in “food packages” for families that have
difficulties of access to food, which may use also to condition an improved nutrition
for children and pregnant women;
Participatory Capacity and Needs Assessment
Ch
ap
ter:
2.
Ma
in f
ind
ing
s o
f th
e s
tud
y
33
• Implementation of pilot projects with schools and poor families in order to
demonstrate to the local actors the best practices to improve food security and
nutrition at targeted community level;
• Organize seminars and training workshops for improvement of capacities of local
government specialists on food security and nutrition concepts, approaches and
mechanisms to deal with it. The main subject of such training, as proposed by
participants, include:
o Improving technical knowledge and information on: principles of good
nutrition; types of products with higher content of nutrients; ratios between
carbohydrates, proteins, vitamins, micronutrients, etc.; alternative foods that
could be used, etc.;
o Improving planning of interventions: preparation annual plans for ensuring
community food security; improving local food production; proportion of
non-agriculture income generating activities; establishment and management
of local and community food stocks; assessment, monitoring and reporting of
food security and nutrition situation; etc.
2.5. Opportunities to increase food availability
2.5.1. Perceptions of local authorities on food availability opportunities
The majority of participants in the meetings declared that most of the areas have
opportunities to increase the production and availability of food products within their
territory. The existing opportunities (as declared by the participants) to increase food
availability may be grouped as follows:
• Improving post harvesting, handling and processing technologies and practices has
been identified as the most important opportunity in short-medium term to improve the
nutrition. Reducing the losses of significant quantities of production (as a result of
mismanagement and lack of post harvesting technologies) and introduction of small-
scale processing technologies and practices will significantly contribute to increased
food availability at the household level;
• Improving local production: Most households are producing mainly a limited number of
traditional types of food products in their farms. Despite the current difficult soil and
agro-ecological condition in some of the highly mountainous areas, there are possibilities
to: introduce new types of production (especially new fruits and vegetables); improve
yield and productivity; improve technical knowledge; improve farm specialization and
efficiency by improving production technologies, seeds, inputs’ use and cultivation
Participatory Capacity and Needs Assessment
Ch
ap
ter:
2.
Ma
in f
ind
ing
s o
f th
e s
tud
y
34
practices. In addition there are possibilities to better exploit the forest fruits (i.e.
blueberries, blackberries and herbs) for home consumption.
• In addition, as yields for most of cultivated crops are still relatively low, there
possibilities to significantly increase the quantity of production of the current crops and
livestock through introduction of improved techniques, practices and technologies.
Figure 10. Importance of main groups of opportunities to increase food production
While all regions have stressed the opportunities to improve post harvesting practices
(especially processing and conservation of products), the level of perceived opportunities to
increase the quantity and types of products varies is also high especially Bushat, Gruemire,
Golaj, followed by a moderate level in comes of Kastrat, Bujan, Bicaj and Tropoje e Vjeter.
More limited opportunities to increase production seem to be perceived in Shishtavec,
Topojan, Zapod and Iballe, due to the highly mountainous terrain and more difficult agro-
ecological conditions, and in the urban and sub-urban areas of Kamez, Bushat and Puka,
these opportunities are limited mainly due to the limited availability of arable land.
2.5.2. Perceptions of communities on food availability opportunities
When asked about the most common types of food they usually consume, the majority of
community representatives seem to account about staple food (mainly cereals, beans and
Participatory Capacity and Needs Assessment
Ch
ap
ter:
2.
Ma
in f
ind
ing
s o
f th
e s
tud
y
35
potatoes) and dairy products (“we don’t have the luxury to select food items, we eat what
we have” {Shishtavec, Kukes}).
In general there is little differentiation in
feeding within the family members between
adults, children and women (with the
exception of pregnant women in some
cases): “even if we want to differentiate, our
conditions don’t allow us to do as we may
not produce everything needed ourselves”
{Rrethina, Shkoder}, “we don’t have money
to buy the other things needed for a good
nutrition” {Bicaj, Kukes}, “we don’t have
tradition in differentiating family
members and we don’t know how to do it
without being seen as discriminating the
others” {Gruemire, Shkoder}, “the only time
when I heard about the need of
differentiating pregnant women and
children was at the local doctor, seems good
but is difficult to do in practice” {Dobrac,
Shkoder}.
When asked about what types of food
products a family should normally consume,
most of them mention the full range of
products (cereals, beans, meat, vegetables,
fruits, dairy and fish). As regards the
possibility of improving the availability of
these products, the majority of them declare
that the current economic conditions don’t
allow them, or they link it with the agro-
ecological conditions. When discussing more
in details about the local possibilities of production and processing of some additional
products, results that most women have a general good knowledge, especially in small-scale
home processing (pickles, dried meat, dried fruits, etc. The figures below present the
community perceptions about the possibilities of producing and consuming more products
at local level.
Figure 11. Main mission/limited food components in the usual diet
Participatory Capacity and Needs Assessment
Ch
ap
ter:
2.
Ma
in f
ind
ing
s o
f th
e s
tud
y
36
Figure 12. Possibilities for more fruits, vegetables, forest fruits and hers (by regions)
Figure 13. Opportunities to increase food production
Figure 14. Possibilities for more fruits, vegetables, forest fruits and herbs
A woman in Kukes (from Shishtavec Commune) declared “It’s true that we have very little
arable land area in our farms and our production is really limited, but we also spoil and
misuse a lot of products. At harvesting season, a lot of fruits are rotten or feed to animals as
we do not manage to them and they are very little to send them to the market. I guess
something can be done with them but besides jam. I don’t know how else I may use them for
improving my children’s nutrition”. “We have a good tradition in dried meat and fruits but
produce these products in very small quantities as we don’t have appropriate equipment and
tools” {Bicaj, Kukes}, “we do some vegetable processing based on traditional knowledge and
in primitive technologies” {Bushat, Shkoder}.
Participatory Capacity and Needs Assessment
Ch
ap
ter:
2.
Ma
in f
ind
ing
s o
f th
e s
tud
y
37
However, if developed, these products may contribute towards improving availability to
food during the off-season consumption (especially during the winter).
Other community participants in the focus group meetings described the issue with
sentences such as “we eat almost the same things during all year along, mostly things that
we produce in our little farms such as bread, beans, potatoes and dairy products”, “we see
fruits and vegetables in out diet only during the harvesting season (late summer and early
autumn)”, “the winter diet is almost only base on main staple food item”, etc.
2.6. Community opinions on food security and nutrition
interventions
The main categories of intervention proposed by the community participants for improving
food security at household and community level include (in order of importance):
• introduction of improved production, processing and conservation tools, instruments
and inputs at farm level;
• introduction of production and processing technology packages, including introduction
where possible of the year-round production system;
• provision of training, advice and technology assistance to the producers; and
• preparation and distribution of brochures, leaflets on new and improved ways and
methods of production, processing and conservation of local products;
The table below presents the weighted importance of the above-mentioned categories of
interventions as perceived by the local community representatives.
Participatory Capacity and Needs Assessment
Ch
ap
ter:
2.
Ma
in f
ind
ing
s o
f th
e s
tud
y
38
Figure 15. Main categories of interventions to improve food security proposed by communities (by region)
Figure 16. Main categories of interventions to improve food security proposed by community
The civil society representatives that attended the focus group discussions seem to accord
with the proposals that come from the community members.
Figure 17. Main categories of interventions proposal by civil society members
They also favor at a large extend the support for the development of the small-scale agro-
processing and introduction of year-round cultivation system. However, many of the civil
Participatory Capacity and Needs Assessment
Ch
ap
ter:
2.
Ma
in f
ind
ing
s o
f th
e s
tud
y
39
society members insist also in the promotion and support for the development efficient of
business models and the overall households economic activities.
In this context, the development of the non-agriculture rural economic activities is
considered as an important source of income, thus improving food security especially for
households which have limited food production opportunities such as the urban and sun-
urban areas (Kamez and Paskuqan). For the later, the promotion of urban agriculture
practices may be an important source of households’ food security improvement.
2.7. Improving local capacities
Almost equally in the three study regions, the majority of the civil society members and
individual experts represented in the meetings, tend to accord that in order to improve the
situation of the nutrition, one of the first thing that should change is the way how the local
government deals with the nutrition issues. This is followed by introduction of more
effective ways/methods to inform the community in nutrition issues and the introduce
improvements in the traditional nutrition practices and habits.
Figure 18. What should change to improve the local nutrition situation?
Figure 19. Most effective interventions proposed to improve capacities and nutrition situation
Organization of direct meetings with the targeted community members is declared to be the
most preferred and considered by the civil society and community members as one of the
most effective instruments in informing the community about nutrition issues.
These meetings should be continues and not only based in quick campaigns. In order to this,
the responsibility should not be left only to the health sector, but a large number of actors is
proposed to be involved, including, local government administration, agriculture specialists,
local NGOs, etc.
Participatory Capacity and Needs Assessment
Ch
ap
ter:
2.
Ma
in f
ind
ing
s o
f th
e s
tud
y
40
Figure 20. Potential categories off actors to be involved in public information about nutrition
Participatory Capacity and Needs Assessment
Ch
ap
ter:
3.
Co
ncl
usi
on
s a
nd
re
com
me
nd
ati
on
s
41
3. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Key conclusions: Based on the findings and results of this assessment we would like
conclude by stressing few important points that we this are important in the preparation
and implementation of future interventions for improving food security and nutrition in the
targeted area:
• The overall level of awareness, knowledge and information of key regional and local
authority actors about nutrition issues (nutrition in general and especially related to
children and women) remain generally low, both at the regional and local level.
• Although the local government administration should be a very important actor for the
promotion of the local development, its current role in dealing with the nutrition and
food security issues remains very limited throughout the study area.
• The main identified causes of malnutrition are linked with: (i) Community development
factors, mainly linked to the lifestyle and tradition; (ii) the level of community education
and information; and (iii) objective reasons mainly linked to limited agriculture
production and productivity, limited incomes, etc.
• The majority of the targeted areas have significant opportunities to increase the
production and availability of food products within their territory, which are still unused
and/or unexploited due to the lack of capacities of the local actors and of the population
to transform them into goods for the betterment of the living conditions.
• The exploitation of these existing opportunities for improving food security and nutrition
may be reached through well targeted interventions focusing mainly on: (i) improving
post harvesting, handling and processing tools, technologies and practices; (ii)
introducing new types of productions and food products, and; (iii) increasing the
quantity of production of the current crops and livestock. In addition, these
interventions be accompanied by information, trainings, advice and technical assistance
to the producers (on food security strategies and practices) and consumers (on nutrition
issues).
• Improving the capacities of the local actors (especially local government) to plan,
monitor, report and implement nutrition and food security interventions, improvement
of coordination of actions between these actors and the improvement of community
information and knowledge are three very important challenges for the improvement of
the nutrition situation in all targeted areas.
Participatory Capacity and Needs Assessment
Ch
ap
ter:
3.
Co
ncl
usi
on
s a
nd
re
com
me
nd
ati
on
s
42
Key recommendations: On the basis we recommend that the potential future interventions
for the improvement of the food security and nutrition in this area should be along the
following lines:
• Rising the awareness and improving the capacities of regional and local actors on roles
and responsibilities of each of the sector related to food security and nutrition issues,
causes and effects of malnutrition to the population, planning, implementation and
monitoring of food security nutrition interventions;
• Support the local governments in preparation and implementation, on participatory
basis, of food security and nutrition management plans for the 15 targeted commune
and municipality;
• Raise awareness within with teachers, students and parents at all schools and introduce
of food security and nutrition as well as knowledge about the local resources as a subject
at school education for children;
• Facilitate the process of better valorization of local resources by the local community in
favor of improvement of nutrition and local economic development in the area (working
with different community groups and local stakeholders;
• Promote and facilitate an active participation of the community (and especially the most
marginalized of families) in economic activities, fostering food production and
processing, economic diversification and thus improving chances for improved food
security and nutrition;
• Test and demonstrate new and improved agriculture and food production technologies,
tools and practices, including introduction of new types of crops (especially fruits and
vegetables) improved input use practices, etc., in order to improve household food diet;
• Provide technical assistance, advice and accompany the new initiatives enough long in
time so to ensure their sustainability and, take-up and replication of best business
models;
• Promote and facilitate cooperation and coordination between different local actors and
community members in tackling and resolving various issues that may arise during the
implementation of the food security and nutrition interventions.
Participatory Capacity and Needs Assessment
Ch
ap
ter:
4.
An
ne
xe
s
43
4. ANNEXES
Annex 1. Details of proposed interventions
MAIN COMPONENTS
Based on the findings of this assessment we propose the below scheme of possible
interventions for the improvement of the situation, which lies in three main components:
1. Capacity Building with Local Actors and LGUs
2. Community awareness raising and formation
3. Community based interventions through investments of formative character.
In this context, the components include:
Component 1: CAPACITY BUILDING with local actors and lGUs
1. LOCAL ACTORS AT REGIONAL LEVEL
(i) Joint Capacity Building Session (all sectors)
Joint training sessions and on-the-job session trainings with the personnel of the health,
social assistance and agriculture sectors, focusing on the drafting of the “Nutrition
Management Action Plan at Regional Level”, in full coordination between sectors Health,
Social Assistance, Agriculture.
(ii) Health personnel at Regional Level (ToT with the personnel operating at communes
level)
Being that the health personnel is dependent of the Regional Directories, the
updating/training sessions are proposed for the health personnel operating at commune
level: family doctors, nurses, midwifes, with the aim to prepare them as Community
Trainers (ToT) and to train/update them with the most recent working methodology to
deal with the problems of:
• Malnutrition and its effects;
• Basic elements for a healthy nutrition at family bases.
(iii) Social Assistance personnel at Regional Level (involving also the social assistance
personnel operating at communes level)
Participatory Capacity and Needs Assessment
Ch
ap
ter:
4.
An
ne
xe
s
44
According to the study carried out, the Sector of Social Protection (Assistance), results to
be very indifferent, not well informed and not actively involved in the management of
malnutrition problems in the target areas, although it should be the primary sector to get
involved in the solution/alleviation of the poverty problems and consequently also of the
malnutrition ones.
Aiming to the improvement of practices in the future, building of capacities of the
personnel of this sector and in order to engage them seriously in the management of
nutrition at communes’ level, we consider that the involvement of the personnel of the
social protection (assistance) sector in mirrored training sessions is of crucial importance.
The subjects to be dealt during the training sessions with the social protection personnel
could focus on:
• How to have a clear picture on the current nutrition situation in their territory for
those categories suffering malnutrition, and how can they plan the opportune
interventions for the situation improvement.
• Which are the possible alternatives of social protection (social assistance)
including nutrition elements, that could be offered to the extreme poverty
category.
• Kindergartens and schools, as practical models of services to offer in favor of the
children’s healthy nutrition, and to serve also as focal points for the training
(formation) of the parents and community.
In this context, every Commune, under the assistance of the social worker, will
have to try and aim to create (activate) such practical model (pilot
kindergarten/schools), where the social assistance sector will be actively engaged
and involved for the successful management of these pilots and at the same time
will work with the community and with the parents for the dissemination of the
healthy nutrition practices and notions.
The trainings delivered, will help the social protection personnel, both at regional
and communes level, to be actively involved and professional in dealing with the
poverty and malnutrition issues and problems.
2. AT COMMUNES’ ADMINISTRATION LEVEL (sectors’ specialists)
The capacity building process with the personnel (sector’s specialists and officials) could
be organized like on-the-job trainings, focusing on the “Drafting and definition of the
Nutrition Management Local Action Plan in the 15 Communes involved in the project”.
The drafting and definition of the Communes Nutrition Management Action Plan will be
the result of training and capacity building process with the communes’ administration
(officials/specialists), during which will be dealt issues like:
Participatory Capacity and Needs Assessment
Ch
ap
ter:
4.
An
ne
xe
s
45
• Approaches to implement food security and nutrition assessments at community
level;
• Local participatory planning of food and nutrition security for
communities/families within their territory;
• Improving food supply opportunities within the territory (through improving local
food production supply chain) and through the market outlets;
• Better exploitation of local food production and procuring resources and
opportunities;
• Ensuring food stock (storage) for the winter period and in emergency cases;
• Monitoring and reporting the nutrition situation, with the respective sector’s
responsibilities, including periodical reviews and analyses at the Commune
Council level about the food and nutrition security situation in their territory;
• The coordination among local authority actors intervening within a certain local
government unit on various aspects of food and nutrition management in their
territory;
• Basic elements of the ‘Nutrition Management Action Plan’ at local level.
The result of the training/capacity building process with the communes’
administrations will be the drafting and development of the Local Action Plan for the
management of nutrition situation at every commune involved in the project.
Component 2: COMMUNITY AWARENESS RAISING AND TRAINING
Target of this component will be the below groups:
• Teachers and Parents: In all the 9-grade schools in the target communes, should
implement at least once per year an informative training (workshop) session,
dealing with the subject “What are the malnutrition effects (consequences), the
basic standard for a healthy nutrition in the family and family members nutrition
practices”.
These seminars could be organized and implemented in cooperation with the
health personnel trained/updated at regional level, playing the role of community
trainers.
• Teachers and students/pupils: In all 9-grade schools, working with the teachers of
the subject “Vendlindja” or “Geography”, where in the education program or in
specific teaching hours, to integrate (include) topics like: “Introducing the students
with the local products and practical work to make them familiar with the local
Participatory Capacity and Needs Assessment
Ch
ap
ter:
4.
An
ne
xe
s
46
resources and alternatives of their exploitation (forest fruits, tea, medicinal herbs,
blackberries, raspberry, strawberries, etc.) for a healthy nutrition”.
These workshops and seminars would need to be accompaigned with leaflets or
broshures of practical use and their distribution also in community.
• Health Centers and Community:
o Organization of informative and training sessions by the health centers
(the territorial health personnel) with the women in the villages, dealing
with subjects like: (i) the standard of family nutrition (feeding) and the
malnutrition consequences; (ii) feeding culture in the family and the
care/attention towards nutrition of children and pregnant women.
o Formation activities of practical character with the groups of women in
villages at every commune, where to implement practical cooking
demonstrations containing diversity of products and out of the traditional
way of methods.
o Production and dissemination of didactic materials on nutrition and
diversity of family nutrition.
Component 3: COMMUNITY BASED PILOT DEMONSTRATIONS
This component aims to introduce, test and demonstrate practical and feasible models
that have a direct impact on improving food and nutrition security situation for the
population in the target areas. The creation of these pilot demonstrations would aims to:
• Activate the local resources and opportunities of the targeted areas having an
impact in the improvement of the nutrition situation;
• Improve the local food supply chains (from production to processing and
marketing) having an impact on food availability and accessibility;
• Introduce practical models of efficient exploitation of local opportunities to
increase the range/diversity of food products available and assessable for a
healthy nutrition;
• Improve families’ food preparation and cooking skills and knowledge to ensure
food and nutrition secirty using locally available products.
• Promote establishment of efficient farming models and non-agriculture income
generating activities in rural families, as opportunities to insure increased
incomes, increased purchasing power and thus improved food accessibility.
Indicative pilot demonstration topics could be:
Participatory Capacity and Needs Assessment
Ch
ap
ter:
4.
An
ne
xe
s
47
1. Transformation of local resources (forest fruits, various teas and herbs, strawberries,
blackberries, raspberries, etc) into feeding and curative products for the population.
• Establish nr.X pilot demonstration models. Main types of investments proposed:
processing technology; working tools; experience sharing/exchange; promotion
dissemination materials; technical assistance / accompaniment.
2. Agriculture and livestock products processing methodology, as an opportunity of
nutrition diversification.
• Establish nr.X pilot demonstration models. Main types of investments proposed:
processing technology; working tools; experience sharing/exchange;
promotion/dissemination materials; technical assistance/accompaniment.
3. Build-up the family garden food products supply chain (conveyor) for the family feeding
needs and market supply.
• Establish nr.X pilot demonstration models. Main types of investments proposed:
working tools (greenhouses, seeds, inputs, etc); experience sharing/exchange;
promotion/dissemination materials; technical assistance/accompaniment.
4. Promoting / incentivizing the income generating activities, to assure/improve the supply
with supplementary products
• Establish nr.X pilot demonstration models. Main types of investments proposed:
assistance for the business plan preparation; support through financial
schemes (grant combined with credit) for small scale business activities;
accompaigning and monitoring the businesses start-up and consolidation;
experience sharing/exchange.
Participatory Capacity and Needs Assessment
Ch
ap
ter:
4.
An
ne
xe
s
48
Annex 2. Aditional tables
1. The level of local authorities’ knowledge in Kukes about concepts and components of food security and malnutrition
Health
sector
Agriculture
sector
Social
sector
Education
sector
1)Overall food security concept
2) Components of food security:
2.a) Food availability
2.b) Food accessibility
2.c) Food utilization
2.d) Stability
3) Overall concept of malnutrition
4) Types of malnutrition:
4.a) lack of proteins and energy
4.b) lack of vitamins and micronutrients
4.c) other issues (such as unbalanced
feeding, obesity, etc)
5) Differences-Food security/Nutrition
Legend: - high or medium; - low; - none or very low (insignificant)
2. The level of local authorities’ knowledge in Shkoder about concepts and components of food security and malnutrition
Health
sector
Agriculture
sector
Social
sector
Education
sector
1)Overall food security concept
2) Components of food security:
2.a) Food availability
2.b) Food accessibility
2.c) Food utilization
2.d) Stability
3) Overall concept of malnutrition
4) Types of malnutrition:
4.a) lack of proteins and energy
4.b) lack of vitamins and micronutrients
4.c) other issues (such as unbalanced
feeding, obesity, etc)
5) Differences-Food security/Nutrition
Legend: - high or medium; - low; - none or very low (insignificant)
Participatory Capacity and Needs Assessment
Ch
ap
ter:
4.
An
ne
xe
s
49
3. The level of local authorities’ knowledge in Tirana about concepts and components of food security and malnutrition
Health
sector
Agriculture
sector
Social
sector
Education
sector
1)Overall food security concept
2) Components of food security:
2.a) Food availability
2.b) Food accessibility
2.c) Food utilization
2.d) Stability
3) Overall concept of malnutrition
4) Types of malnutrition:
4.a) lack of proteins and energy
4.b) lack of vitamins and micronutrients
4.c) other issues (such as unbalanced
feeding, obesity, etc)
5) Differences-Food security/Nutrition
Legend: - high or medium; - low; - none or very low (insignificant)
4. The level of community knowledge about concept and types of malnutrition in Kukes region
Shis
hta
ve
c
To
po
jan
Za
po
d
Bic
aj
Tro
po
je V
j.
Bu
jan
Go
laj
Ka
stra
t
1) Overall concept of malnutrition
2) Types of malnutrition:
2.a) limited use of food products rich in energy and
proteins
2.b) limited use of food products rich in vitamins and
micronutrient
2.c) use of unbalanced food (i.e. too much fat,
carboihidrates, etc.,)
3) Differences-Food security/Nutrition
Legend: -moderate to high; -moderate to low; -low; -very low; -none
Participatory Capacity and Needs Assessment
Ch
ap
ter:
4.
An
ne
xe
s
50
5. The level of community knowledge about concept and types of malnutrition in Shkoder region
Gru
em
ira
Rre
thin
a
Bu
sha
t
Iba
lla
Pu
ke
1) Overall concept of malnutrition
2) Types of malnutrition:
2.a) limited use of food products rich in energy and proteins
2.b) limited use of food products rich in vitamins and micronutrient
2.c) use of unbalanced food (i.e. too much fat, carboihidrates, etc.,)
3) Differences-Food security/Nutrition
Legend: -moderate to high; -moderate to low; -low; -very low; -none
6. The level of community knowledge about concept and types of malnutrition in Tirana region
Ka
me
z
Pa
sku
qa
n
1) Overall concept of malnutrition
2) Types of malnutrition:
2.a) limited use of food products rich in energy and proteins
2.b) limited use of food products rich in vitamins and micronutrient
2.c) use of unbalanced food (i.e. too much fat, carboihidrates, etc.,)
3) Differences-Food security/Nutrition
Legend: -moderate to high; -moderate to low; -low; -very low; -none