13
QUALITY REPORT PART A Patient Experience 1

PART A Patient Experience

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

QUALITY REPORT

PART A – Patient Experience

1

Complaints and Patient Advice and Liaison Report

17 formal complaints were received in November. This compares to 28

in the same month last year. 7 related to outpatient areas and 7 related to

ward areas. 2 related to the Emergency Department; 1 related to central

appointment administration.

5 complaints were received for Medicine, 8 for Surgery and 4 for Women

and Children.

The 5 reasons for complaints were 9 (53%) clinical care and concerns,

3 (18%) staff attitude and behaviour, 2 (12%) admissions / transfers /

discharge procedures, 2 (12%) appointments and 1 (5%) communication

and information.

Of those staff involved in the complaints, 10 (59%) related to medical

staff.

There were 15 further contacts received by the Complaints Team. These

were resolved quickly to the complainant’s satisfaction. The

complainants then decided that a formal complaint was not required.

These were logged as PALS contacts. 2

10152025303540

Nu

mb

er

of

com

pla

ints

Total number of complaints received

Number of complaints received Trendline

There were 214 contacts with the PALS service at the RUH site:

128 required resolution; 74 requested information or advice; 8 provided

feedback and 4 were compliments

We are encouraging wards and outpatient departments to report the number

of compliments they receive to PALS each month. This will enable us to

provide a more balanced report on patient and carer experience.

The top three subjects requiring resolution were:

Communication and Information – of the 45 contacts (35%) there were 11

contacts regarding difficulties in accessing outpatient services by telephone -

this was across 8 departments in the Trust. There are no trends or themes

in relation to the remaining 34 enquiries.

Appointments – of the 34 contacts (26.5%) were queries regarding

outpatient appointments across 11 departments, for example waiting times

and changes to appointment date.

Clinical care and treatment – of the 23 contacts (18%) none were

attributed to a particular hospital service.

Nursing Quality Indicators Triangulation Chart - Exception Report (November data)

5

Areas of focus - The full Triangulation Report is in Appendix A. Two

wards have flagged this month:

Respiratory ward

This ward has flagged for the second consecutive month with day and night

staffing Registered Nurse (RN) fill rate <90% due to RN vacancies,

however HCA hours were increased to cover, particularly at night.

Quality matrices to note are:

• Pressure ulcer x 1 Grade 2 (x 1 Grade 2 last month)

• Staff sickness RN 17.3% HCA 9.1% (12.2% and 10.8% last mth)

• Appraisal rates RN 50% HCA 77.8% (61.5% and 66.7% last mth)

• FFT score improved to 82 and 1 negative PALs

(63 and negative PALS x 2 last month)

Action being taken

Long term sickness is being managed and staff are starting to return to

work. Staff are deployed from other wards to cover and the ward has been

allocated EU nurses which commence in January 2016.

Cardiac ward

This ward has flagged for the first time due to <90% RN fill rate on both day

and night shifts although increased HCA hours at night to cover. The ward

has RN vacancies and high RN sickness.

Quality matrices to note are:

• FFT score 75, formal complaint x 1

• Staff sickness RN 11.3%

• Appraisal rates RN 63.6% and HCA 54.5%

Action being taken

Long term sickness is being managed.

Recruitment is active and 6 RNs recruited although not in post.

Agency nurses are being block booked

Staff are deployed from other wards to cover as required.

HCA hours have been increased to cover, particularly at night.

The Directorate has placed Cardiac nurse staffing on the Risk Register with

these mitigating plans.

Note:

These 3 wards flagged the previous month, however their quality

matrices have improved this month.

Medical Assessment Unit (MAU)

RN vacancies are still high (around 15.0wte) however staff have

been deployed from other areas to cover.

ACE and Combe ward (OPU)

Both of these wards patient quality matrices have improved, however

it is important to note that both these wards were closed for 2 weeks

in November due to Norovirus.

Ward quality matrices to overall:

Nursing quality matrices have improved this month however it is

important to note that up to 7 wards were closed due to Norovirus in

this month starting from 11th November onwards.

• Complaints and negative PALs (wards only) have gone down

slightly this month

• Clostridium difficile x 4 cases (7 cases last month)

• Grade 2 Pressure Ulcers x 2 (5 last month)

• Nurse staffing Datix reports reduced this month from 29 ( 41 last

month)

• The number of Falls are fairly consistent with last month, but note

the change of interpretation/definition regarding moderate harms

to major harms this month to comply with NPSA guidance.

Recruitment update

• RN vacancies are around 80wte and recruitment remains very

active with new starters in the pipeline and EU nurses starting

Jan/Feb 2016.

• Trainee Assistant Practitioner applications exceeded expected

numbers (48) with interviews being held 22nd and 23rd December

for 15 posts on the wards. 3

QUALITY REPORT

4

PART B – Patient Safety and Quality Improvement

6 Patient Safety

Priorities

Deteriorating Patient including National Early Warning Score (NEWS)

Sepsis Acute Kidney Injury (AKI)

Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Falls, Clostridium difficile

10 Executive sponsored projects of must-do’s

informed by business unit priorities, CQUIN or as a response to stakeholders

15 Divisional Safety Priorities

Pressure ulcers, Discharge, Ward and outpatient accreditation, Medicines

management, Critical Care, Diabetes, Dementia, Maternity (still birth and

breastfeeding), Urgent Care (Ambulatory Care), Peri-operative

Medicine

Reducing length of stay

Medical ambulatory care

Stroke sentinel audit

performance

Venous Thromboembolism

(VTE)

Nursing vacancies

Surgery

Reducing length of stay

Surgical ambulatory care

(ESAC)

Critical Care

Integration with RNHRD

specialties

Improving patient information

Women and Children

Increased consultant obstetric cover - labour

ward

Gynaecology emergency pathway

Acute paediatric flow

Reducing neonatal readmissions to maternity

Reducing full term admissions to NICU

Patient Safety - Acute Kidney Injury (AKI)

Background

Acute Kidney Injury has been established nationally as an area for improvement

with National drivers such as National ‘Think Kidneys’ campaign, NICE guidelines,

National patient safety alert in June 2014, National CQUIN 2015/6.

RUH has agreed a local CQUIN target with the CCGs.

Current Status

• The CQUIN report for the second quarter has been submitted and awaiting

response but expecting full achievement as compliant with all targets

• Project Support Manager appointed for 6 months to support the AKI work and

started in November

• Baseline numbers for incidence of AKI at RUH have been established from the

e alert – average 64 patients a week, 250 patient a month

• 2/3 of patients with AKI were triggered from ED majors i.e. were admitted with

AKI (similar to national data)

• Next commonest areas MAU, ICU, respiratory and cardiac wards

• Baseline data from July – September 2015 (709 patients) demonstrates that

65% of these patients had AKI grade 1, 20% grade 2 and 15% grade 3

• CCG representative joined steering group to link with care in the community

Awareness and Training

• Awareness campaign UR INE Trouble has been launched in November with

cascade training of a simple 10 minute teaching tool and launch of U.R.I.N.E.

bundle

• November training target was met of 100 staff since the beginning of November

Bundle compliance

• Details of measures to demonstrate bundle compliance have been established

• Focused work now starting on pilot wards (cardiac and respiratory)

• Baseline measures being collected on these wards in November and December

• Improvement ideas to improve bundle compliance to be tested in January

• Work planned with radiology to standardise process for reducing AKI following

contrast medium for imaging

Next Steps

• Test improvement ideas on cardiac and respiratory wards

• Awaiting IT linking E alert to discharge summary for patients with

AKI. Mandatory information on AKI then included in discharge

summary

• Outcome data from BIU to be obtained

• Developing patient information stickers linking with NBT as regional

renal centre and national resources

5

Patient Safety - Acute Kidney Bundle

6

Patient Safety - Clostridium difficile

Background

The RUH target for ‘Trust apportioned’ Clostridium difficile in 2015/16 is 22

cases. Clostridium difficile toxin positive stool samples taken 3 or more

days after admission are ‘Trust apportioned’.

Current Performance

Analysis of the last 10 RCAs (September and October)

• Delay in sending stool samples in 7 cases

• Delay in isolation in 5 cases

• Missing stop/review dates for antibiotics in 4 cases

• Stool chart not commenced on admission in 1 case

• Cleaning scores below standard (2 amber, 2 red)

• Dirty commodes noted on two wards where the C diff infections occurred

Actions

• ‘Stool rules’ circulated to staff

• Posters on toilet doors to prompt patients to report diarrhoea

• Side room tool in use and regular contact between IP&C Team and Site

Team

• Ward Pharmacists to check that stop/review dates are documented

• Stool charts to be completed from admission to MAU and SAU

• Cleaning issues to be addressed by the Cleaning Working Group

• Matrons and Ward sisters reviewing commode cleanliness regularly

• Trial of sporicidal wipes for commode cleaning

7

Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar

Actual no

cases

4 4 5 6 7 6 7 4

CDI

appeals

(no lapse

of care)

1 1 3 1 0 1 1 0

Proposed

trajectory

4 3 3 2 2

Actions: • The C diff peer review took place on 19 November and was chaired by

the Director of Nursing and Quality, B&NES CCG. Final report has not

yet been received. Actions for improvement following the review

include:

• Improved antimicrobial stewardship

• Timely stool sampling

• Improving cleaning of the environment and equipment by

reviewing cleaning staff roles and providing effective materials

for decontamination of equipment and environment

Pressure Ulcers

Next steps

Outpatients Accreditation

Outpatient departments are being mapped against KPIs Foundation

level. An observational audit has also been undertaken in each

outpatient area. The findings from the assessment will be presented at

the Outpatient Steering Group in January 2016.

Maternity and Paediatrics Accreditation

KPIs for Foundation level have been agreed with Maternity and

Paediatrics. Assessment to be completed in January 2016.

Ward Accreditation: Bronze level

The KPIs for Bronze level have been agreed. The assessment includes

further indicators including observations of care and unannounced

visits. An observational audit tool has been developed which is currently

being tested. This is an extensive assessment and it will require a team

of staff to undertake the observations of care. It is proposed that the

Bronze level assessment will be undertaken as part of the planning for

the CQC inspection of the Trust. It is anticipated that this will be

completed by February 2016.

Background

The Accreditation Programme has been developed to recognise and

incentivise high standards of care and reduce variation in practice at

ward and department level. It also provides assurance that regulatory

requirements including the Care Quality Commission (CQC)

fundamental standards are being met and identify where any

improvements in practice are required.

Wards and departments are assessed against Key Performance

Indicators (KPI) under the CQC domains (safe, caring, effective,

responsive, well-led) over a period of 6 months. The assessment takes

a tiered approach with wards initially being reviewed against

performance indicators for Foundation level. These are minimum

standards of quality and safety that wards are expected to achieve.

The indicators for Foundation level include information on the number

of incidents, safety briefings and handover, white board rounds, written

complaints, the Friends and Family Test, compliance with Millennium

assessments, compliance with key documentation and infection control

audits, mandatory training and staffing standards.

Current Performance

To date 19 adult wards have achieved accreditation at Foundation

level. There are 4 adult wards that have not yet achieved Foundation

level. The senior sisters of these wards have been given support with

developing an improvement plan and will be reassessed between

December 2015 and March 2016.

The Emergency Department have also achieved accreditation at

Foundation level.

Accreditation Programme Update

8

Patient Safety – Falls

Background

Reduction in falls is one of the Trust’s safety priorities. All ward areas,

including the RNHRD site, have an identified ward falls lead, with

evidence of embedding of active falls prevention and management

strategies. The targets for this workstream are a 10% reduction in the

number of repeat falls (the same patient falls more than once) and a 25%

reduction in falls resulting in moderate or severe harm. 05

101520253035

Nu

mb

er

of

falls

Falls resulting in moderate or severe harm (cumulative)

2015 (falls) 2015 (cumulative) 2015 Target

0

2

4

6

8

Nu

mb

er

of

falls p

er

1,0

00 b

ed

days

Falls per 1,000 bed days

Falls per1,000 beddays

HQIP

• The Trust is above the trajectory for moderate or major harms from falls. The

Trust had a rate of 0.16 falls per 1000 bed days resulting in

moderate/major/death. This is below the HQIP benchmark of 0.19

moderate/severe/death per 1000 bed days

• The Patient Safety Steering Group and the Falls Steering Group endorsed a

decision to change the harm level arising from falls with serious injury, in line

with National Guidance. Falls that were classified as resulting in moderate harm

are now major harm. From November this will be reflected in all reporting.

• A Falls Leads study morning is planned for December 2015 to include national

falls audit action plan, and development of falls training matrix

• Achievement of Falls CQUIN for Q2. There continues to be concentrated

support to identified clinical areas to facilitate achievement of Q3. A quarterly

report is produced which details progress to the work plan. The data from the

falls care bundle audit is included to provide ward level data

• Presentation to Innovation Panel planned for December on use of slippers.

Results suggest qualitative and anecdotal benefit. However data does not show

a reduction in falls

9

The Trust is above the trajectory for repeat fallers. There were 17 repeat

falls in November 2015. However, this is within the monthly target of 19.7.

Repeat Falls continue to be a high priority for reduction and are being

addressed through the ward falls leads and individual ward action plans.

050

100150200250300350

Nu

mb

er

of

falls

Repeat Falls 2015

2015 (falls) 2015 (cumulative) 2015 Target

The Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership (HQIP) proposed a

benchmark of 6.63 falls/1000 bed days in October 2015. This replaces the

previous NPSA benchmark of 5.6 falls/1000 bed days.

Patient Safety – National Falls Audit

Background The National Falls audit is funded through the Healthcare Quality

Improvement Partnership (HQIP). The audit criteria are based on NICE guidance

on falls assessment and prevention (2013) and delirium (2010) and National

Patient Safety Agency (NPSA) guidance.

Method A team of clinicians carried out the audit in May 2015, submitted the

results electronically, and the national results were published in September 2015

Sample size was 30 patients who were admitted consecutively over 2 days.

Results Organisational audit - the Trust was compliant with 23/35 standards.

Clinical audit - The Trust achieved amber or green compliance with 13/22

standards. The results identified a number of areas of good practice and

compliance. Low compliance and areas below the national percentage have

been analysed. All results have been discussed at the Falls Steering Group and

actions incorporated into the Falls work plan.

Areas of low compliance and actions are summarised in the tables below.

10

Organisational Standard Action

Use of a delirium assessment and

management plan

Addressed in conjunction with senior nurse

quality improvement and CQUIN facilitator

Assessment of fear of falling Action complete. Question now included in

electronic assessment.

Medication review and modification Electronic application in pharmacy and ward

level information being developed

Evaluation of vision On Falls Care Plan. Included in training and

emphasised to ward falls leads

Provision of appropriate walking aids

7 days a week and access to safe

footwear

Admission areas have access. Trust-wide 7

day access is being reviewed by therapy

lead. Access to safe footwear to be

discussed at Falls Steering Group

Bed Rail Audit On Falls Work plan as planned action

Non-exec director with responsibility

for leading falls prevention

Currently not identified. Falls Steering Group

to scope requirements

Clinical

Standard

National

%

RUH % Action

Cognitive

assessment

57.9% 44% Admission documentation updated to include

AMT

Continence

care plan

69.4% 30.8% Plan to review this care plan as part of wider

review of RUH Care plans

Lying/

standing BP

recorded

16.1% 25%. Included in training sessions, included in root

cause analysis recommendations, included in

audits, intranet links with NEWS, and ward

falls leads.

Falls Care

Plan

63.6% 51.7% The Falls Steering Group has agreed that all

patients receive an initial electronic

assessment. Following this a Falls Care Plan

is not always required . In the sample, 83% of

appropriate patients had a care plan present.

The steering group is satisfied that no action

is required and clinical staff are adhering to

RUH guidelines and policy.

Written

information

provided

11.4% 0% Ensure all wards have supply of information

leaflets via ward falls leads. Importance of

documenting these actions emphasised in

training, falls leads study morning, and

individual ward meetings.

Mobility aid

within reach

67.6% 53% Importance emphasised to therapists, ward

falls leads and clinical teams through ward

meetings and training. To be included in falls

care bundle audit.

Call bell in

sight/reach

of the patient

82.3% 79.3% Currently measured on comfort form audit. To

be incorporated as part of falls care bundle

audit

T

The HQIP is planning a second audit in September 2016 after organisations

have introduced interventions to improve services. An internal preliminary

audit will take place prior to this to test the quality improvement measures that

are in place or planned.

Serious Incident (SI) summary

Current Performance

During November, five Serious Incidents were reported. Four of these remain under investigation.

The incidents have been discussed with the patient and/or their family and they are aware of the investigation, in line with the Duty of

Candour framework.

11

Date of

Incident

Datix ID Summary

09.11.15 37452 Fall resulting in a fracture

10.11.15 37603 Unexpectedly unwell at birth

03.11.15 37260 Fall resulting in a fracture

26.11.15 37988 Fall resulting in a fracture

27.11.15 38100 7 wards affected due to an outbreak of Norovirus

Serious Incident reports approved by the November Operational Governance Committee

(OGC)

12

Date of

Incident

Datix

ID

Summary Learning/ Recommendations

28.03.15 30694 Omission of medical alert • Clinical staff need to be aware of how to obtain information on ‘red drugs’, which are drugs not

included on the GP list, because they don’t prescribe them;

• Clinical teams should make the consultant team aware of the admission of any patients.

06.06.15 32730 Patient fall resulting in an injury • To review the use of over-bed tables without brakes in MAU;

• Encourage patients not to use over-bed tables as a means of support;

• Falls risk assessments to be undertaken within the agreed timeframe.

09.06.15 32783 Patient fall resulting in a fracture • To comply with the falls care plan requirement for lying and standing blood pressure

assessments;

• To review the delirium, pathway with the use of the falls care plan;

• To utilise the mental health liaison team for patients with delirium, for a standardised approach

across the Trust.

17.07.15 34053 Patient fall resulting in a fracture • The process for HCA’s undertaking and documenting admission assessments requires review;

• Reinforcement of the falls care bundle within the RNHRD environment.

09.08.15 34768 Collapse following diabetic

ketoacidosis

• For the Diabetes team to provide education to relevant clinical staff on the management of type 1

Diabetes in the elderly;

• To include Diabetes e-learning in the mandatory training matrix.

15.08.15 34914 Patient fall resulting in a fracture • To share the report findings with the patient's GP and the CCG, to highlight admission criteria

• To review the criteria for moving staff when balancing staffing levels.

03.09.15 35574 Patient fall resulting in a fracture • To consider the discharge of patients to their pre-admission place of residence, if awaiting long

term plans for alternative accommodation/placement;

• To identify a lead in complex discharges, to ensure that issues that require action are not

overlooked.

Overdue Serious Incident Reports Summary

13

As of 30 November, there are 19 open Serious Incidents (SIs); of these, one is overdue.

From September 2015, the timescale for completion of the investigation moved to 60 days, as per the NHSE SI framework, therefore

some SIs are still measured against the previous timeframe of 45 days.

The investigation has been concluded for ten of the open incidents and the reports will be submitted to the Operational Governance

Committee for approval at the December meeting.

A target of minimal overdue SIs by the end of the financial year (with the exception of HR investigations) has been agreed, supported by

the post of Duty of Candour and Serious Incident Advisor, achieving this has proved difficult for the past few months, due to the

competing commitments of the investigating managers. However, progress has been made in providing completed investigation

reports, that are of a good quality, more rapidly.

Trajectory Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dev Jan Feb Mar

Actual 12 11 13 4 6 9 8 1

Target 12 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3

0

5

10

15

Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct NovNu

mb

er

of

ov

erd

ue

SIs