22
Drying Panel

Panel Discussion: Wax vs Mold Surface ... - Investment Casting

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    5

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Drying Panel

Panel Discussion: Wax vs Mold Surface Dryness Presented by:Julie MarkeeKey Process Innovations

Understanding the Drying Process

o Liquids are Absorbed into Shello Mold must “dry”o Influenced by a number of factors

After a mold is dipped

Liquids move from the mold surface to the wax surface

Degree of soak back is dependent on numerous factors

Liquid Migration

Liquids move to mold surface in two different stages

1st Stage: Rate of evaporation is independent of moisture content

2nd Stage: Water removal is based on moisture content

Liquid Migration

The Million Dollar Question

Which area of the mold has more moisture at the end of the drying

process?

Mold Surface Or Wax Surface

Quest for the AnswerThe Slurry

120/200 Fused Silica Slurry Small particle binder Viscosity – 20 seconds on #5 EZ

The Shell: 7 Layers were applied 2 with Fine Sand, 5 with Coarse

2 Locations were Measured: Wax and Mold Surface

Dips were applied when Mold Surface reached 65% RHUsed kpi-dry® system

Kpi-dry® System

Mold Set-Up

Sensor remained on Wax Surface

Moved sensor just prior to each layer

In Between Dips

Sensor at Mold Surface

At Conclusion of DippingSensor at Wax Surface

Sensor at Mold Surface

The Test

Room Environment

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

1:02:0

0

2:14:0

0

3:26:0

0

4:38:0

0

5:50:0

0

7:02:0

0

8:14:0

0

9:26:0

0

10:38:0

0

11:50:0

0

13:02:0

0

14:14:0

0

15:26:0

0

16:38:0

0

17:50:0

0

19:02:0

0

20:14:0

0

21:26:0

0

22:38:0

0

Air

Flo

w (

fpm

)

Tem

pe

ratu

re/R

ela

tive

Hu

mid

ity

Elapsed Time

Room Environment

Temperature (F) Relative Humidity (%) Air Flow (fpm)

Initial Test Data

50

55

60

65

70

75

0:00

1:59

7:16

8:19

9:19

10:19

11:19

12:19

13:19

14:19

15:19

16:19

17:19

18:19

19:19

20:19

21:19

22:19

23:19

Tem

per

atu

re (

F)

Elapsed Time (min)

Temperature - Initial Test

Wax Surface Temp Shell Surface Temp Room Temperature

3-4 ºF difference between Wax and Shell Surface

Initial Test Data

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0:00

2:11

7:30

8:40

9:47

10:54

12:01

13:08

14:15

15:22

16:29

17:36

18:43

19:50

20:57

22:04

23:11

Ro

om

Rel

ativ

e H

um

idit

y (%

)

Rel

ativ

e H

um

idit

y (%

)

Elapsed Time (min)

Relative Humidity - Initial Test

Wax Surface RH Shell Surface RH Room Relative Humidity

Very different profile from temperature

Initial Test Data

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0:00

2:11

7:30

8:40

9:47

10:54

12:01

13:08

14:15

15:22

16:29

17:36

18:43

19:50

20:57

22:04

23:11

Ro

om

Rel

ativ

e H

um

idit

y (%

)

Rel

ativ

e H

um

idit

y (%

)

Elapsed Time (min)

Relative Humidity - Initial Test

Wax Surface RH Shell Surface RH Room Relative Humidity

Area near sensor is being re-wet

Room Environment – 2nd Test

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

0:00:0

0

2:33:0

0

5:06:0

0

7:39:0

0

10:12:0

0

12:45:0

0

15:18:0

0

17:51:0

0

20:24:0

0

22:57:0

0

25:30:0

0

28:03:0

0

30:36:0

0

33:09:0

0

35:42:0

0

38:15:0

0

40:48:0

0

43:21:0

0

Air

Flo

w (

fpm

)

Tem

pe

ratu

re (

F)/R

H (

%)

Elapsed Time (min)

ROOM ENVIRONMENT

Temperature (F) Relative Humidity (%) Air Flow (ft/min)

Second Test Data

50

55

60

65

70

75

80

0:00:0

0

3:07:0

3

6:07:0

1

8:33:0

5

10:53:0

4

13:11:0

4

15:31:0

5

18:00:0

5

20:17:0

5

22:33:0

6

24:49:1

2

27:06:1

6

29:24:1

9

31:40:2

3

33:56:2

3

36:13:2

3

38:29:2

3

40:48:2

3

43:05:2

3

Tem

pe

ratu

re (

F)

Elapsed Time (min)

Temperature - Second Test

Wax Surface Temp Shell Surface Temp

Temperature is much closer with additional air movement

Second Test Data

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0:00:0

0

3:07:0

3

6:07:0

1

8:33:0

5

10:53:0

4

13:11:0

4

15:31:0

5

18:00:0

5

20:17:0

5

22:33:0

6

24:49:1

2

27:06:1

6

29:24:1

9

31:40:2

3

33:56:2

3

36:13:2

3

38:29:2

3

40:48:2

3

43:05:2

3

Re

lati

ve H

um

idit

y (%

)

Elapsed Time (min)

Relative Humidity - Second Test

Wax Surface RH Shell Surface RH

Profile starts to change at as additional layers are added

Conclusionso The wax surface has a higher level of

moisture than the mold surface (as measured by relative humidity)

o Difference in moisture levels increases as more layers are applied

o The amount of air flow can impact the difference in the temperature and relative humidity between the wax and mold surface

o Next step correlate wax cracking to mold dryness

Appreciation to: