PAKISTAN HIGHWAY REHABILITATION PROJECT … HIGHWAY REHABILITATION PROJECT Resettlement Plan-N-5 (Phase 11) Document Stage: Final Project Number: 3 846 PAK November 2007 Prepared by

PAKISTAN HIGHWAY REHABILITATION PROJECT

Resettlement Plan-N-5 (Phase 11)

Document Stage: Final

Project Number: 3 846 PAK

November 2007

Prepared by National Highway Authority, Islamic Republic of Pakistan for the World Bank.

The resettlement plan is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily

represent those of the Bank's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature.

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Executive Summary

Executive Summary

A. THE HIGHWAY REHABILITATION PROJECT

The 8,500-km-long national highway system managed by the National Highway Authority (NHA) carries 75-80% of Pakistan's total commercial traffic. Figure 10-1 depicts the existing national highway system in Pakistan. The major traffic movements are concentrated along the 1,760-km National Highway N5 that stretches south to north across the Karachi-Lahore-Rawalpindi-Peshawar- Torkham corridor. Parts of this highway date back 500 years. It is the main corridlor connecting the provinces of the NWFP, the Punjab, and Sindh, and serves more than half of Pakistan's inter-city traffic. It connects the northern parts of the country with international markets through the port of Karachi, which accounts for 96% of Pakistan's trade.

About half the national highway network is in poor condition due to ever increasing traffic volumes, very high axle loads and inadequate maintenance. On the basis of past trends of increasing dependence of national economic growth on road infrastructure, it is estimated that traffic volume will increase by about 180% by 2024 over the base year 2001. Unless this situation is immediately addressed, the network will deteriorate rapidly over the next six years, causing a 32% increase in road user costs. The Government of Pakistan (GoP), therefore, is implementing the National Highways Improvement Program (NHIP) to address the degradation of the national highway system, through the phased improvement of approximately 2,700 km of roads. The program will result in a gradual reduction in average network roughness, leading to a 5% decrease in road user cos1;s- a saving of Rs 189 billion (USD 3.26 million) over a six-year period. The highway sections that fall under the NHIP have been divided into three groups prioritized according to need and source of -funding. The N5 currently carries the bulk of the country's commercial and passenger traffic, and this is a priority for improvement.

For the implementation of the NHIP, the World Bank has extended financial assistance for selected sections of N5. The development objective of the World Bank-assisted Pakistan Highway Rehabilitation Project (PHRP) is the sustainable delivery of a productive and efficient national highway system contributing to lower transportation costs. The USD 282 million-project supports the borrower's program by financing a distinct se-gnent of NHIP works, sustaining essential reforms in the sector, as well as strengthening the capacity of the NHA.

Under the HRP, 856 km of road along the N5 highway will be upgraded in two phases spread over five years. Of this total length, 550 km of the N5 will be upgraded under rehabilitation and maintenance projects (RMP), and 306 km of the N5 under resurfacing and strengthening projects (RSP). Rehabilitation and maintenance projects involve those sections of the project corridor that need major reconstruction work. All of the Phase I1 works are on N5.

5065019 - Contract Administration and Construction Supervision for Highway Rehabilitation Project - Pakistan N5(Phase II) Resettlement Action Plan, November 2007 Page ii

'"$g

@a'$&

%

+4F

dS

h%

EC

E

xecu

tive

Sum

mar

y

Fig

ure

10-1

Pak

ista

n N

atio

nal H

ighw

ay S

yste

m

5065

019 - C

ontr

act A

dmin

istr

atio

n an

d C

onst

ruct

ion

Sup

ervi

sion

for H

ighw

ay R

ehab

ilita

tion

Pro

ject

-P

akis

tan

N5(

Pha

se II

) Res

ettle

men

t Act

ion

Pla

n, N

ovem

ber 2

007

Pag

e iii

Executive Summary

The following is a list of the six Phase I1 project links. This Phase includes ihe rehabilitation and maintenance of 375.2 km along the N5, i.e.

Contract 3 Moro - Ranipur,

Contract 5 Ubauro - Shaikh Wahan,

Contract 7 Mian Channu - Sahiwal,

Contract 1 1A Mian Channu - Sahiwal Bypasses

Contract 8 Lahore - Gujranwala and

Contract 9 Turn01 - Chablat

Contract 9 section was transferred from Phase I to Phase I1 due to the late introduction of changes in its development strategy. Table 1-1 also lists the sections se1ecte:d in Phase I1 for resurfacing and strengthening (RSP). These total 132 km spread over two road sections.

Contract 11B Mian Channu - Sahiwal - Okara

Contract 13 Kharian - Rawalpindi

C. PROJECT IMPACTS

The project is anticipated to produce favourable impacts over the long-term fhat will promote economic development and an improvement in living standards in the project areas. However, the project may also lead to some negative impacts, particularly during the construction period. Socio-economic surveys of projects and informed by Feasibility Studies indicate that 458 people will be adversely affected through project implementations.

Extensive project-related documentation - including an Environmental Assessment (EA), Environmental Management Plan (EMP), Social Assessment (SA), - has bee:n prepared to set out measures to mitigate negative socio-environmental impacts that potentially would result from HRP works.

D. SCOPE OF THE RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN (RAP)

A RAP is a development plan in favour of people adversely impacted by HRP implementation. It is in keeping with the project policy framework reflecting both existing Pakistani laws and Work Bank policy, particularly the Operational Policy (OP) No. 4.12. In none of these projects will there be need for either land acquisition or demolition of structures. Adverse impacts include the need to relocate squatters' temporary commercial structures; encroacher's temporary commerciial structures and squatter-owned utilities. There will similarly be need to relocate public utilities.

Reflecting Bank resettlement policy, a Social Assessment (SA) and Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) must be undertaken. Analysis of survey results identifies categories of Project Affected People (PAPs). An Entitlement Matrix is then constructed, listing all categories of PAPs identified in these surveys along with respective mitigation measures (their entitlements). This Ehtitlement Matrix provides the basis around which the Resettlement Acton Plan (RAP) is composed. Excluding categories of PAP from the Entitlement Matrix renders the RAP non-compliant with Bank policy. The Entitlement Matrix is prepared at the initial stage of RAP preparation. An attempt to prepare a matrix prior to having to hand field survey results would almost certainly lead to Bank non-compliance.

5065019 - Contract Administration and Construction Supervision for Highway Rehisbilitation Project - Pakistan N5(Phase II) Resettlement Action Plan, November 2007 Page iv

Executive Summary

The following provides some clarification on the concepts of Eligibility, Legal Frameworl<, and Compensation and Entitlement Policy, central to resettlement policy.

E. ELIGIBILITY

Eligibility for PAP entitlements is prescribed in an Entitlement Matrix. This Matrix is to reflect Bank Resettlement Policy and to identify all categories of adversely impacted people triggered by that policy. A matrix commonly takes into account loss of agriciultural land; loss of residential, commercial or institutional land; loss of residential, cornmercial and/or institutional structures; loss of standing crops or trees and loss of public infrastructure. In addition, PAPs may be eligible for cash payments in lieu of lost income or for re-training and credit for business development.

For legal title holders, customary or usufruct rights holders, cash compensation of affected land would be paid on the basis of replacement cost of the acquired land, in accordance with Bank Operational Policy 4.12. The tenants and sharecroppers will be compensated for the un- expired duration of the lease. The vulnerable encroachers or squatters will be compensated for affected structure at the replacement cost.

The owners of the affected structure, with or without legal title, will be entitled to cash compensation at the replacement value (salvage value of the structure will not be deducted). The affected cultivators will be entitled to cash compensation for the damaged crops calculated on the basis of market prices. The owners of the affected trees, with or without land title, will be paid cash compensation, on the basis of market value of the trees according to the type, age, size and productivity of trees In case of the loss of any common resources or facilities, the project will replace or restore the affected facility or resource, in consultation with the affected community.

The project will pay cash compensation to the relevant agency based upon the replacement value of the affected infrastructure. Alternatively, the project will replace or restore the damaged infrastructure in the pre-project condition or better, in consultation with the concerned agency.

The project will pay cash compensation, at replacement cost, for damage to,, or relocation of public utilities. Similarly, the project will pay for the repair, relocation or reconstruct of religious site, in consultation with affected community. Project will al,so assist in the relocation of graves.

The cut off date for eligibility is the last day of the Social Survey for the project.

F. LEGAL FRAMEWORK

The Pakistan Highway Rehabilitation Project (PHRP) falls under the regulatlory requirements as set by the national resettlement policies and operational policies of the World Bank. As far as the legal framework is concerned, at this point, the only national legislation relating to land acquisition and compensation is the Land Acquisition Act (LAA) of 1894. Taldng into account the requirements of the LAA, and World Bank policies, an entitlement matrix was developed to define compensation for the acquisition of land and built-up property and for resettling PAPs operating within the CoI, and therefore subject to involuntary reloc,ation. These are briefly discussed in the subsequent sections.

The RAP contains a review of World Bank Operational Policies that may be triggered either during RAP preparation or during project implementation.

5065019 - Contract Administration and Construction Supervision for Highway Rehabilitation Project - Pakistan N5 (Phase II) Resettlement Action Plan, November 2007 Page v

Executive Summary

Once approved by all parties the RAP becomes a legally enforceable document.

G. COMPENSATION AND ENTITLEMENT POLICY

Based on relevant laws of the GOP and OP 4.12 of the World Bank, a compensation and entitlement policy has been developed to guide National Highways Auth~ority (NHA) in ensuring that people adversely affected by engineering works have these adverse impacts mitigated. The lowest acceptable outcome of the compensation and entitlement policy is to restore PAPs to pre-project living standards, income earning capacity and production levels. Compensation for lost assets will be at replacement cost. Similarly, the policy stipulates payments to affected people in lieu of loss of incomes as a result of constructi,on works.

To meet the Bank's strategy of restoring the social and economic base PAP'S will require at least the following: compensation for lost assets and incomes, transfer and relocation assistance, and help to rehabilitate and restore their livelihoods. Compensatio!n at market rates will only be adequate when neither livelihood nor housing is affected.

H. INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS

The GoP is the project investor for the HRP, while the General Manager of NHA is responsible for project implementation. Resettlement Committees will be established at provincial level to assist NHA in all activities related to the RAPS. They will be supervised by the provincial and district project coordination officials, respectively, as well as NHA.

Training will be provided for selected NHA personnel to help ensure that improved environmental management and resettlement practices are integrated into all IVHA day-to-day operations. The objective will be to enhance the existing NHA capability through the induction of dedicated environmental and resettlement professionals and through the provision of support and on-the-job training.

I. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION AND CONSULTATION

This Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) will be disclosed to all stakeholders at the commencement of the proposed project and copies made available to the stak~eholders at sites designated by the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA), in accordance with national legislation (PEPA 1997). In addition, the Executive Summary of the RAP will be translated into Urdu and made available to affected communities (and also kept at the project sites). This will ensure that local communities are aware of the project, its key impacts, the mitigation measures, and the implementation mechanism. In addition, the Executive ;Summary of the RAP will be disclosed through the National Highways Authority (NHA) official website.

J. COMPLAINTS AND GRIEVANCES

Grievance redressal mechanism for conflict resolution will be part of the institutional and implementation process. The focal point will be the Deputy Project Coo:rdinator in each contract road section.

The HRP will ensure that effective mechanisms are available and accessible to PAPs for addressing grievances and complaints; fixther that PAPs are fully aware of these mechanisms.

5065019 - Contract Administration and Construction Supervision for Highway Rehabilitation Project - Pakistan N5 (Phase II) Resettlement Action Plan, November 2007 Page vi

Executive Summary

External monitoring and evaluation will also verify that complaints by I'APs have been resolved appropriately and in accordance with the RAP.

K. MONITORING AND EVALUATION

Social development outcomes will be monitored at various levels. The federal DirectorDD SocialIInfrastructure and Land Management will be responsible for monitoring the progress of resettlement activities under the RAP, based on progress reports submitted by the regional DDs Operations. He will also be responsible for reporting on the status of the project's consultation strategy, similarly based on progress reports submitted by the regional DDs Operations.

A Social and Resettlement Committee will be formed, consisting of regional staff, i.e.Director (Operations), DeputylAssistant Director Social/InfrastructurelLand Management (SILM), and Project Coordinator and HQ staff including DirectorDeputy Director, SILM.

Participatory monitoring will be undertaken by NGOs/CBOs/independent a~gencies selected by NHA in Islamabad. They will monitor the RAP and other social issues, e.,g. the efficacy of grievance and redressal mechanism, implementation of the Entitlement Matrix, etc.

Project implementation will be subject to regular monitoring as part of the overall regular project reporting system. In addition, the project will be the subject of periodic Bank review missions.

At the end of Year 1 of project implementation, the NHA will review the efficacy of the monitoring and evaluation arrangements for social, resettlement, and land management issues, and refine the arrangements accordingly.

The services of an external agency will be engaged to undertake both a mid-term and project completion evaluation.

L. REPORTING

Overall reporting will be the responsibility of the Regional Project Coordirlator (WC) who will provide reports to the Supervision Consultant for collation. The latter will monitor all activities, relating to implementation of the RAP, including potential conflicts with asset- owners. All monitoring reports will be submitted to GM (NHIP) regional General Managers and the Bank, and reflected in Quarterly Progress Reports.

M ROAD IMPROVEMENT FOR NATIONAL HIGHWAY N5

Under the HRP, 856 km of road along the N5 highway will be upgraded in two phases spread over five years. Of this total length, 550 km of the N5 will be upgraded under rehabilitation and maintenance projects (RMP), and 306 km of the N5 under resurfacing and strengthening projects (RSP). Rehabilitation and maintenance projects involve those sections of the project corridor that need major reconstruction work. All of the Phase I1 works are on N5.

The rehabilitation works will generally follow the previously established alignment. Even the additional carriageway will be constructed within the ROW. Thus the rehi2bilitation works will not involve land acquisition that may cause d.isruption of any settlement or affect the livelihood of local communities.

The selected road links traverses generally agricultural areas. The road alignment is generally

5065019 - Contract Administration and Construction Supervision for Highway Rehabilitation Project - Pakistan N5 (Phase II) Resettlement Action Plan, November 2007 Page vii

Executive Summary

flat on a low embanlunent that ranges between 1 and 3 metres in height. The existing width of the road is from 5 to 8 metres with rough pavement and uneven edges. Proposed improvement measures for the project include widening of the road formation and pav:ing with asphalt concrete materials. All resettlement issues associated with improvement works will follow the guidelines laid out in the RAP.

N. PROJECT IMPACTS AND ENTITLEMENTS

A total of 458 squatters will be affected by project implementation. All presently either own or rent temporary squatter structures for accommodation andlor cornrnerciall purposes. They will be eligible for entitlements covering the cost of relocating these squatter structures. A further 2,692 structures/public utilities will also be relocated at project expense.

0 RESETTLEMENT COSTS AND IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

Resettlement costs cover both compensation for damages andlor losses to physical assets, entitlement payments for PAPS with specific circumstances and additional costs for administration, monitoring and evaluation.

The cost of PAPS' resettlement under Phase I1 (including livelihood assistance if required) is estimated at Rs 1,958,000 including a contingency sum of Rs 500,000. A provisional sum of Rs 28,162,000 will cover the cost of relocating public utilities, mosques and graves that could potentially be affected in the ROW. An amount of Rs 2,000,000 has be:en set aside for independent consultants to monitor the social aspects of the resettlement work. A further sum of Rs 2,000,000 lump sum is included to provide training for NHA personnel to help ensure that improved environmental management and resettlement practices are integrated into all NHA day-to-day operations. The total estimated resettlement budget for Phase I1 is Rs. 30,125,000.

Implementation of the RAP will occur over the life of the project. Implementation of income rehabilitation assistance will continue for some time afterwards, depending on the scale and nature of these programmes as identified by the eligible households.

5065019 - Contract Administration and Construction Supervision for Highway Reh,abilitation Project - Pakistan N5 (Phase II) Resettlement Action Plan, November 2007 Page viii

.. i ' I

2a5rv+t A%&& ~ 8 4 ~c Resettlement Issues 7 r$W* ~ 2 . ~ .#kg

Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

ABBREVIATIONS & TERMINOLOGY

.................................................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION 1-2

I . 1 Project overview .......................................................................................................................... 1-2

...................................................................................................................................... 1.2 Project Area 1-4

.................................................................................................................................... 1.3 Responsibility 1-4

1.4 Location of Sub-Project Links ........................................................................................................... 1-4

........................................................................................................................... 1.5 Project Description 1-4

.................................................................................................................................. 1.6 Scope of Works 1-5 ....................... .......................................................................................... 1.6.1 The Project Corridor ... 1-5

2 RESETTLEMENT ISSUES ...................................................................................................................... 2-1

............................................................................................................................... 2.1 Social Assessment 2-1 .................................................................................................. 2.1.1 Objectives of Social Assessment 2-1

2.1.2 Methodology ................................................................................................................................ 2-1

......................................................................................................... 2.2 Socioeconomic Baseline Survey 2-2 2.2.1 Survey Components ..................................................................................................................... 2-2 2.2.2 Survey Approach ................................................................................................................... 2-2

.................................................................................................. 2.3 Census of Project-AfSected Persons 2-2 ..................................................................................................................... 2.3.1 Census Components 2-3

2.3.2 Census Approach .......................................................................................................................... 2-3

.......................................................................... 2.4 Socioeconomic Profile of Project-Affected Persons 2-4

2.5 Demographic Profile ......................................................................................................................... 2-4

............................................................................................................................ 2.6 Economic Profile 2 - 4 .................................................................................................... 2.6.1 Nature of Business/Occupation 2-4

................................................................................................. 2.6.2 Income and Expenditure Patterns 2-5

....................................................................................................... 2.7 Other Socioeconomic Indicators 2-6 ........................................................................................................................ 2.7.1 Access to Credit 2 - 6

........................................................................................ 2.7.2 Housing Characteristics and Amenities 2-6 .......................................................................................................... 2.7.3 Access to Social Amenities 2-6

2.7.4 Gender Analysis ...................................................................................................................... 2-6 ............................................................................................................... 2.7.5 Social Infrastructure 2 - 6

................................................................................................ 2.8 Census of Project-Afected Persons 2 - 7

....................................................................................... 2.9 Distribution of Project-Affected Persons 2 - 8 ............................................................................................... 2.9.1 Income Patterns and Vulnerability 2-8

............................................................................................. 2.10 Commercial Structures Within CoI 2 - 9

.................................................................................................. 2.10.1 Value of Affected Structures 2-11

3 LEGAL FRAMEWORK ........................................................................................................................... 3-1

.............................................................................................................................................. 3 . I General 3-1

............................................................................................................ 3.2 Land Acquisition Act of 1894 3-1

5065019 . Contract Administration and Construction Supe~ision for Highway Rehabilitation Project . Pakistan N5 (Phase II) Resettlement Action Plan. November 2007 Page 1-1

"G&~SMEC Resettlement Issues %g.%$ v&

........................................................................................................ 3.3 World Bank Safeguard Policies 3-1 .................................................................. 3.3.1 Involuntary Settlement (Operational Policy OP 4.12) 3-2

........................................................................... 3.3.2 Cultural Property (Operational Policy OP 4.11) 3-2 3.3.3 Projects on International Waterways (Operational Policy OP 7.50) ............................................ 3-3

...................................................................................... 3.3.4 Gender and Development (GPIBP 4.20) 3-5 ........................................................... 3.3.5 Environmental Assessment (Operational Policy OP 4.0 1) 3-5

3.3.6 Forests (Operational Policy OP 4.36) ......................................................................................... 3-6 ................................................................................ 3.3.7 Pest Management (Operational Policy 4.09) 3-6 .............................................................................. 3.3.8 Safety of Dams (Operational Policy OP 4.37) 3-6

......................................................... 3.3.9 Projects in Disputed Areas (Operational Policy (OP) 7.60) 3-7 ..................................................................... 3.3.10 Natural Habitats (Operational Policy (OP) 4.04) 3-7

...................................................................... 3.4 Other National Environment- Social Related Statutes 3-8 3.4.1 Government of Punjab, Forestry, Wildlife, Fisheries and Tourism Department (Notification No .

. ................................................................................................................... FOFT (EXT) VIII 17/96 :I998 3-8 3.4.2 Provincial Wildlife (Protection, Preservation, Conservation and Management) Acts, Ordinances

.................................................................................................... and Rules (Sindh 1972 and Punjab 1974) 3-8 .................................................................................................................... 3.4.3 Antiquities Act, 1975 3-8

3.5 Others ................................................................................................................................................ 3-8

4 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION AND CONSULTATION ...................................................................... 4-1

4.1 Consultation and Disclosure Plan (PCDP) ................................................................................... 4-1

............................................................................................................................................ 4.2 Structure 4-1

4.3 Background: ..................................................................................................................................... 4 - 1

4.4 Project Affected Persons (PAPS) ................................................................................................ 4 - 2

4.5 Project Stakeholders .......................................................................................................................... 4-2

4.6 PCDP Action Process: .................................................................................................................... 4 - 2

4.7 Brief of consultations ................................................................................................................... 4-3

................................................................................................................ 5 RESETTLEMENT IMPACTS 5-4

5.1 Project Impacts ............................................................................................................................ 5-4

............................................................................................. 5.2 Scope of Resettlement Action Planning 5-4

.......................................................................................................................... 5.3 Corridor of Impact 5 - 4

............................................................................................................................ 5.4 Resettlement Issues 5-5

...................................................................................................................... 5.5 Loss of crops and trees 5-7

......................................................................................................... 5.6 Loss of Public Infrastructure 5 - 7

.......................................................................... 5.7 Loss of Culturally SigniJcant Structures/Buildings 5-7

5.8 Adverse Effect Due to Temporary Land Possession .......................................................................... 5-8

6 MITIGATION AND ENTITLEMENTS .............................................................................................. 6-1

6.1 Project Resettlement Principles ........................................................................................................ 6-1

6.2 Eligibility and Project Entitlements .................................................................................................. 6-2

6.3 Loss of commercial structures ........................................................................................................ 6-2 6.3.1 Squatter-owner operating business ................................................................................................ 6-2 6.3.2 Vulnerable encroacher-owner operating business ........................................................................ 6-3 6.3.3 Vulnerable encroacher-tenant operating business ....................................................................... 6-3 6.3.4 Absentee squatter-owners not operating business ......................................................................... 6-3 ----

5065019 . Contract Administration and Construction Supervision for Highway Rehabilitation Project . Pakistan N5 (Phase II) Resettlement Action Plan. Iqovember 2007 Page 1-2

Resettlement Issues

.............................................................................................................................. 6.4 Loss of livelihood 6-3 ....................................................... 6.4.1 Workers employed by squatters and vulnerable encroachers 6-3

..................................................................................... 6.5 Loss of community/privately-owned utilities 6-3

............................................................................................................ 6.6 Loss oftrees owned by tenant 6-4

........................................................................... 6.7 Loss of Culturally Signijicant Structures/Buildings 6-4

................................................................................................. 7 INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS 7-1

................................................................................ 7.1 Institutional Arrangementsfor Implementation 7-1

......................................................................................................... 7.2 Grievance Redresal Procedure 7-2

. 7.3 Training ................................................................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined

............................................................................................... 8 MONITORING AND EVALUATION 8 - 1

...................................................................... 8.1 Monitoring and Evaluation ofResettlement Activities 8.1 ...................................................................................................................... 8.11 lntemal Monitoring 8-1 ..................................................................................................................... 8.1.2 External Monitoring 8-2

.............................................................................................. 8.2 Monitoring Roles and Responsibilities 8-2

..................................................................................................................... 8.3 Monitoring Parameters 8-3

................................................................................ 8.4 Independent Social/Participatory Monitoring: 8 - 4

........................................................................................................................................... 8.5 Reporting 8-4

9 COSTS AND BUDGET ........................................................................................................................... 1

............................................................................................................. 9.1 Proceduresfor Flow of Funds I

9.2 Inflation Adjustment ............................................................................................................................. 1

..................................................................... 9.3 Implementation. Administration and Contingency Costs 1

...................................................................................................... 9.4 Resettlement Plan Cost Estimation 2

10 IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE ......................................................................................................... 1

............................................................................................................................... Approval of the RP 1

Establishment of the Resettlement Committee ...................................................................................... I

.............................................................................................. Training ofthe Resettlement Committee 1

Establishment of Detailed Compensation Rates ................................................................................... I

Conducting the Public Information Campaign .................................................................................... I

..................................................................................... Compensation and other Entitlement of PAPS 1

Reorganisation on Existing Property and Clearance of the Project Area ........................................... 2

Linkage between Resettlement Implementation and Construction Schedule ........................................ 2

ANNEX 1: Record of Public Consultation/ Project Disclosure Campaign .................................................... 1

A3-2 General Stakeholders' Workshops ............................................................................................................ 4

A3-3 Workshops Organized by EIA Consultants ............................................................................................... 5

A3-4 Sindh Stakeholders' Workshop ................................................................................................................. 5

............................................................................................................................................ Highwqy Operation 5

506501 9 . Contract Administration and Construction Supervision for Highway Rehabilitation Project . Pakistan N5 (Phase II) Resettlement Action Plan. November 2007 Page 1-3

Resettlement Issues

A3-5 Punjab Stakeholders ' Workshop ............................................................................................................... 6

............................................................................................................... A3-6 Workshops Organized by ARUP 6

....................................................................................................................................... A3-7 Scoping Sessions 7

A3-8 Roadside Consultations .................................................................................................................. 9

A3-9 Resettlement Issues .................................................................................................................................... 9 ........................................................................................................................................ A3-9-1Gujar Khan 10

A3-9-2 Dina ................................................................................................................................................ 10

....................................................................................................... A3-I 0 Address of Stakeholders' Concerns 10

A3-11 Concerns of People at Lahore-Gujranwala & Turnol-Chablat Sections .............................................. 12

.......................................................................................................... ANNEX 2: ENTITLEMENT MATRIX 10-1

A6-1 Entitlement Matrix Under Resettlement Plan ....................................................................................... 10-2

.................................................................................... AS-2 Institutional Arrangements for Implementation 10-2

ANNEX 3 . SOCIO-ECONOMIC BASELINE QUESTIONNAIRE ......................................................... 10-1

....................................................................................... ANNEX 4: CENSUS SURVEY QUESTIONAJRE 10-1

..... ANNEX 5: TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR PREPARATION OF RESETTLEMENT I'LAN (RP) 10-1

5065019 . Contract Administration and Construction Supervision for Highway Rehabilitation Project . Pakistan N5 (Phase II) Resettlement Action Plan. November 2007 Page 1-4

g&y $f;ggjS&g EC Resettlement Issues

Abbreviations & Terminology

BP

DMS

EIA

EMP

GP

GOP

HH

ICR

MO

PAP

RC

RAP

R&R

USD or $

RP

WE3

Best Practice

Detailed Measurement Survey

Environmental Impact Assessment

Environmental Management Plan

Good Practice

Government of Pakistan

Household

Implementation Completion Report

Monitoring Organisation

Project Affected People (refers to a project affected house:hold)

Resettlement Committee

Resettlement Action Plan

Resettlement and Rehabilitation

United States Dollars

Pakistani Rupees

World Bank (including IDA)

5065019 - Contract Administration and Construction Supervision for Highway Rehabilitation Project - Pakistan N5 (Phase II) Resettlement Action Plan, November 2007 Page 1-1

Resettlement Issues

5065019 - Contract Administration and Construction Supervision for Highway Rehabilitation Project - Pakistan N5 (Phase I I ) Resettlement Action Plan, November 2007 Page 1-1

1 INTRODUCTION

1.1 Project overview

Resettlement Issues

The 8,500-km-long national highway system managed by the National Highway Authority (hTHA) carries 75-80% of Pakistan's total commercial traffic. Figure 10-1 depicts the existing national highway system in Pakistan. The major traffic movements are concentrated along the 1,760-km National Highway lV5 that stretches south to north across the Karachi-Lahore- Rawalpindi-Peshawar-Torkham corridor. Parts of this highway date back 5010 years. It is the main corridor connecting the provinces of the NWFP, the Punjab, and Sindh, and serves more than half of Pakistan's inter-city traffic. It connects the northern parts of the country with international markets through the port of Karachi, which accounts for 96% of Pakistan's trade.

About half the national highway network is in poor condition. Principal rea:sons for this are ever increasing traffic volumes, very high axle loads and inadequate maintenance. On the basis of past trends of increasing dependence of national economic growth on road infrastructure, it is estimated that traffic volume will increase by about 180% by 2024 over the base year 2001. Unless this situation is immediately addressed, the network will deteriorate rapidly over the next six years, causing a 32% increase in road user costs. The Government of Pakistan (GoP), therefore, is implementing the National Highways Improvement Program (NHIP) to address the degradation of the national highway system, through the phased improvement of approximately 2,700 km of roads. The program will result in a gradual reduction in average network roughness, leading to a 5% decrease in road user costs- a saving of Rs 189 billion (USD 3.26 million) over a six-year period. The highway sections that fall under the NHIP have been divided into three groups prioritized according to need and source of funding. The N5 currently carries the bulk of the country's commercia~l and passenger traffic, and thus is a priority for improvement.

For the implementation of the NHIP, the World Bank has extended financial assistance for selected sections of N5. The development objective of the World Bank-assisted Pakistan Highway Rehabilitation Project (PHRP) is the sustainable delivery of a productive and efficient national highway system contributing to lower transportation costs. The USD 282 million-project supports the borrower's program by financing a distinct segment of NHIP works, sustaining essential reforms in the sector, as well as strengthening the capacity of the NHA.

Under the HRP, 856 km of road along the N5 highway will be upgraded in two phases spread over five years. Of this total length, 550 km of the N5 will be upgraded uncler rehabilitation and maintenance projects (RMP), and 306 km of the N5 under resurfacing a id strengthening projects (RSP). Rehabilitation and maintenance projects involve those sections of the project corridor that need major reconstruction work. All of the Phase I1 works are on N5.

5065019 - Contract Administration and Construction Supervision for Highway Reha~bilitation Project - Pakistan N5 (Phase II) Resettlement Action Plan, November 2007 Page 1-2

Resettlement Issues

Figure 1-1 Pakistan National Highway System


~L"%%+sMEc Reseltlement Issues ";;$vj&

1.2 Project Area

The project areas for improvement works are depicted in Figure 1 - 1.

1.3 Responsibility

The Executing Agency of the H W is the National Highways Authority (NHA). Direct responsibility for project implementation lies with General Manager, National Highways Improvement Programme (NHIP) an operating division and sub-organization of NHA. SMEC International and Associates JV are providing technical assistance. Monitoring of project implementation will be the responsibility of the Federal DirectorIDD Social/Infrastructure and Land Management.

1.4 Location of Sub-project Links

Table 1-1 Sections Proposed for Improvement under NHIP -Phase I1

Contract No. Section

Stretch to be Stretch to be Upgraded Upgraded Under RMP Under RSP (km) (km)

3 Moro-Ranipur (ECWISB) 88.5

5 Ubauro-Shaikh Wahan (ECWISB) 53.7

7 Mian Channu-Sahiwal (ECWIACW SB+NB) 46

11A Mian Channu-Sahiwal Bypasses 30

11B Mian Channu- Okara (ECWIACW SB+NB) 72

8 Lahore-Gujranwala (ECWIACW SB+NB) 100 (two additional lanes)

- .. .. - - -- -. .. -- - - - - -. - - -. - ..

9 Turn01 - Chablat (ECWIACW, NB + SB) 57

13 Kharian - Rawalpindi (ECWIACW, NB+SB) - 60

Total 375.2 km 132 km

1.5 Project Description

All project links are parts of N5, spread out between Moiro to the South andl Chablat to the North. Generally the selected road section traverses agricultural areas consisting of both irrigated and rain-fed areas. The road alignment is generally flat on a low embankment that ranges between 1 and 3 metres in height. The existing width of the road is from 5 to 8 metres with rough pavement and uneven edges.

5065019 - Contract Administration and Construction Supervision for Highway Rehabilitation Project - Pakistan IV5 (Phase II) Resettlement Action Plan, November 2007 Page 1-4

Resettlement Issues

1.6 Scope of Works

Proposed improvement measures are largely restricted to paving with asphalt concrete materials and occasional widening of the road formation. All resettlement issues associated with improvement works will follow the guidelines laid out in this RP.

The total length of road to be improved under this project is 500.7km.

1.6.1 The Project Corridor

The 'project corridor' comprises the Right of Way (ROW) and, within that area, the Corridor of Impact'.

The Right of Way is defined as the strip of land along .the roadway under -the legal jurisdiction of IVHA and is determined on a road-by-road basis. It is measured from the centerline of the road and is typically 220 meters across. Construction work will generally be confined within the ROW.

The Corridor of Impact (COI) is the strip of land likely to be adversely impacted, directly or indirectly, during construction andlor operational phases of project implementation. The COI is generally regarded as the width required for actual road construction. It th~erefore includes the carriageway, shoulder, embankment, longitudinal drainage, associated amenities (bus stops, passenger sheds etc), as well as an additional corridor required to facilitate the movement of light construction machinery and to ensure the safety of the pub1.i~.


~&y&~, Rese'ttlement Issues E~$F~;SMEC

2 RESETTLEMENT ISSUES

The Resettlement Plan (RP) for the project aims to ensure that all PAP's in the several selected links are adequately compensated for any project-related acquisition of assets and that sufficient measures are taken to assist the PAP's. This RP is based on:

Entitlement Matrix for Compensation, Resettlement and Rehabilitation of Displaced Persons

Results from Social Assessment and Environmental Assessment.

2.1 Social Assessment

2.1.1 Objectives of Social Assessment

A social assessment of Phase 11 roads was carried out to:

Identify project affected groups, in order to determine which people are likely to be adversely impacted by project works and the extent of respective impacts. This assessment will reflect the 'project corridor'.(see below)

Identify poor and vulnerable groups, with strategies to ensure that such groups benefit from the project

Ensure adequate stakeholder consultation and participation.

2.1.2 Methodology

This section deals with the methodology adopted in collecting and analyzing data to assess the social impact of Phase I1 of the PHRP. The assessment is based on two surveys:

A socioeconomic baseline survey to develop an overall profile of the populiation settled along the project corridor.

A census survey to document the number and economic status of project-afected persons (PAPS) settled in the CoI 1' (see Section 2.3.1).

Prior to these surveys, a reconnaissance level screening was carried out within the R.oW of the Phased I1 sections to verify the presence of a project-affected population settled along the corridor, and to gauge the potential impact of the project in terms of loss of shelter and livelihiood. This initial assessment was used to underpin the census and socioeconomic baseline survey carried out subsequently.

Subsequently referred to as CoI in this document, unless otherwise specified.


&% 'i*' SMEC Y * l . r v

Resettlement Issues 44%: #g

The methodology used in carrying out and documenting the results of both surveys is described in the following sections.

2.2 Socioeconomic Baseline Survey

A sample survey was carried out along those Phase I1 sections bordered by commercial or residential settlements or structures in order to develop a socioeconomic baseline of the general population settled within the ROW of the project corridor. The Mian Channu-Sahiwal, Sahiwal-Okara and Kharian- Rawalpindi sections were not surveyed since the stretches proposed for improvement are not bordered by any such settlements or structures. The purpose of these surveys was to provide a collective baseline against which to appraise mitigation measures. The socioeconomic profile of the population was established based on the PAPS settled within the CoI and general population within as well as adjacent to the ROW.

2.2.1 Survey Components

The survey documented the following features of the sample population settled along the project corridor:

Demographic characteristics

Education and literacy rates

Nature of business/occupation

Annual total and per capita income

Household expenditure patterns

Access to credit

Women's participation in household decision-making

Housing characteristics and amenities

Social infrastructure, e.g., mosques, graveyards.

2.2.2 Survey Approach

Data for the baseline surveys was collected through detailed focus group discussions and individual interviews with the help of a structured questionnaire (see Annex 3) that was pre-tested in the field, and circulated within the NHA and World Bank. Feedback from the NHA and World Bank was also incorporated in the final versions of both census and socioeconomic survey forms. A sample size of 50% was used to represent the PAPS settled within the limits of the corridor of impact (CoI). In addition, an equal number of samples was drawn fi-om within the limits of the ROW and its adjacent corridor in order to represent the socioeconomic conditions of the general population.

2.3 Census of Project-Affected Persons

A 100% population settled within the limits of CoI was surveyed as part of the c'ensus carried out along those Phase I1 sections bordered by any commercial or residential settlements or structures. The Mian Channu-Sahiwal, Sahiwalakara and Kharian-Rawalpindi sections were not surveyed since the stretches proposed for improvement are not bordered by any such settlements or structures. The purpose of each census was to register and document the number and status of IPAPs likely to be physically displaced as a result of project implementation and, therefore, entitled to compensation. This documentation will facilitate the process of compensation, resettlement and rehabilitation under


Resettlement Issues

the resettlement action plan (RAP). The census included people occupying parts of tlhe CoI for shelter, business purposes, or other sources of livelihood.

2.3.1 Census Components

The following variables were documented as part of the census:

Number of PAPS settled in CoI

Nature of businessloccupation

Type and value of structureslassets owned

Replacement cost of structureslassets

Ownership documentation, if any

Annual total and per capita income

Vulnerable groups (identified as below the poverty line)^

Alternative arrangements for resettlement, if any.

Project-affected persons were classified as one of the following1:

= Squatter-owners/business operators

Squatter-tenantslbusiness operators

Squatter employees

Vulnerable encroachers

Absentee owners.

The final date of each respective census is considered the cut-off date defining the affected population entitled to support under the project. (See Table 5.1) People moving into the CoI 1 after this cut-off date will not be entitled to any compensation. In addition, the census documented a number of alternative resettlement sites within the ROW as well as in close proximity.

2.3.2 Census Approach

Data for the census was collected through detailed focus group discussions and individual interviews with the help of structured questionnaires that were pre-tested in the field. Survey forms (census and socioeconomic) were used to target squatter residents (both owners and tenants) and squatter business operators (both owners and tenants). Both forms (census and socioeconomic) are attached as Annex 3.

The following steps were taken to ensure a high level of accuracy:

The CoI was demarcated by NHA-appointed engineering consultants and further verified by environmental assessment consultants.

Interviewslgroup discussions were carried out as efficiently as possible by publicizing a time and venue convenient to most of the local population.

Each census exercise was carried out by a four-member team consisting of socio1ogi:;ts responsible for documenting socioeconomic parameters, and engineers recording technical data such as the demarcation of the CoI, and details of structures, replacement cost, and physical measurements.

' Unlike Phase I, no encroachers were documented during the census.


Resettlement Issues

2.4 Socio-economic Profile of Project-Affected Persons

This section presents the collective results of the socioeconomic baseline surveys carried out for sample populations settled along the following Phase I1 sections:

Morc-Ranipur

Ubaurc-Shaikh Wahan

Lahore-Gujranwala

As mentioned in Section 2.1, the stretches proposed for improvement along thle Mian Channu- Sahiwal, Sahiwal-Okara and Kharian-Rawalpindi sections are not bordered by any settlements or structures. The purpose of the sample surveys was to establish a socioeconom~ic baseline of the population settled along the project corridor against which to appraise mitigation measures. The sample was 258 households, comprising 50% of the identified PAPS (129) plus an equal number of additional households settled within the Corridor of Impact (CoI).

2.5 Demographic Profile

The proportion of males to females in the sample population was found to vary between 55.9 and 65.0% and 35.0 and 44.1%, respectively. The average number of family members per household was calculated to be 5.0, ranging between 4.2 along the Ubauro-Shaikh Wahan section and 6.3 along the Lahore-Gujranwala section. The literacy rate among the sample population ranges between 34.3 and 41.6% among men, and is almost half for women. Detailed demographic information for the Phase I1 sections surveyed is given in Table 2.1.

Table 2.1: Demographic Profile of Selected Phase I1 Sections

Section Average Family Size

Ubauro-Shaikh Wahan 14.2 1 55.9 44.1 / 60.1 40.0 20.1

Gender Composition

Male (%) Female (%I

Lahore-Gujranwala 1 6.3 1 59.1 40.9 1 52.3 34.3 18.0

Literacy Rate (%)

Total Male Female

2.6 Economic Profile

2.6.1 Nature of Business/Occupation

The socioeconomic baseline survey revealed that roughly 43% of the population settled along the project corridor operates roadside general stores; 4% runs small medical stores; 15% manages vehicle workshops; 2% owns garments shops; 20% is employed as semi-skilled or unskilled labor; and 16% is involved in other occupations.


Reseittlement Issues

2.6.2 Income and Expenditure Patterns

Annual Total and Per Capita Income

Based on the data summarized in Table 2.2, the average annual income per household was calculated to be Rs 55,560 along the Moro-Ranipur section, Rs 47,280 along the Ubauro-Shai:kh Wahan section and Rs 50,760 along the Lahore-Gujranwala section. On a per capita basis, the corresponding figures are estimated as Rs 12,078, Rs 12,622 and Rs 10,617, respectively.

Table 2.2: Annual and Per Capita Income Patterns

Section Household Income Average (Rs) Per Capita Income Average (1Zs)

Annual Monthly Annual hfonthl!v

55 560 4,630 - - - -

12 078 1 006 -- -- ... ... " .- .......

Ubaur~Shaikh Wahan 47,280 3,940 12,622 1,051

Lahore-Guiranwala 50.760 4,230 10,617 900

Horisehold Expenditure Patterns

Total annual household expenditure on food and non-food items ranges between an average of Rs 23,238 on the Lahore-Gujranwala section and Rs 47,479 on the Ubauro-Shaikh Wahan section. The ratio between food and non-food expenditure ranges between 87.5 and 12.5%, recspectively, on the Lahordujranwala section, and 82.5 and 17.5%, respectively, on the Ubauro-Shaikh Wahan section. Section-wise details are provided in Table 2.3.

Table 2.3: Average Annual Food and Non-Food Expenditure

Section Food Non-Food Percentage Expenditure Percentage Expenditure Total Income Total Income

Total (fir) (fir)

5065019 - Contract Administration and Construction Supervision for Highway Reha,bilitation Project - Pakistan N5 (Phase II) Resettlement Action Plan, November 2007 Page 2-5

Resettlement Issues

2.7 Other Socioeconomic Indicators

2.7.1 Access to Credit

The proportion of sample respondents with access to credit ranged between 14.7% on the Moro- Ranipur section, and 20% on the Lahore-Gujranwala section. The average amount of loan desired by sample respondents varied between Rs 6,550 on the Ubauro-Shaikh Wahan section and Rs 40,000 on the Lahore4ujranwala section. Most respondents were clearly eager to procure credit for business. Section-wise details are provided in Table 2.4.

Table 2.4: Access to Credit and Credit Use Patterns I

MorwRanipur 14.7 7,500 1 2 0 . 0 50.0 0.0 0.0 30.0 0.0

A~~~~~~ Proportion

Loan Section of Amount

Users

Ubauro-Shaikh 16,3 Wahan

Purpose of Credit Procured (%)

Purchase Business

&use h.larriage/

Wousehol Investmen Hospital- Social

ofHouse d Matters ization R,epair Ptrrposes

Lahore- Gujranwala

20.0

2.7.2 Housing Characteristics and Amenities

More than 60% of the sample population surveyed owned their own houses under a status of simple ownership, a majority of which had built their houses of brick and cement.

2.7.3 Access to Social Amenities

More than 50% of the sample population has access to drinking water. Access to electricity ranged between 100 and 70.1% on the Lahore-Gujranwala and Ubauro-Shaikh Wahan sections, respectively. On average, one-third of the sample population had access to Sui gas.

2.7.4 Gender Analysis

Women's participation in decision-making was found to be low along almost all the !sections surveyed. The extent of women's involvement tends to remain confined to domestic matters, the education of their children, family health, and to a lesser extent, the purchaselsale of property.

2.7.5 Social Infrastructure

Table 2.5 indicates the extent of social infrastructure located within the ROW of the Phase I1 sections. This includes 28 mosques, 12 graveyards, 9 shrines and 16 police posts.

Table 2.5: Community/Public Structures Located Within ROW of Phase I1 Sections -

Section Mosques Graveyards Shrines Police Posts - MorwRanipur 15 8 2 8

Ubauro-Shaikh Wahan 4 1 1 4

Mian Channu-Sahiwal- 4 1 2 Okara


Resettlement Issues

Lahore-Gujranwala 3 2 1 4

Kharian-Rawalpindi 2 3

Total 28 12 9 16

Table 2 6: StructuresNtilities Located Within CoI 1 of Phase II Sections

Section

UbaureShaikh Wahan l a 2 26 9 15 9 1 -

Mim Channu-Sahiwalakara - 5 15 3 8 28

Lahore-Gujranwala 74 576 78 63 43 9 1

Kharim-Rawalpindi -- - - - - - - -

Total 2 90 641 92 121 487 2 3

" Only the boundary wall will be affected.

2.8 Census of Project-Affected Persons

This section describes the outcome of the census carried olut under Phase I1 of the PHRP. As explained in Section 2.2, the purpose of the census was to register and documen~t the number and status of PAPs likely to be physically displaced and/or otherwise affected as a result of the project and therefore entitled to compensation.

The dates on which the census surveys were carried out are given below; these aire also the cut-off dates qualifying PAPs for compensation.

Moro-Ranipur March 22,2003

Ubauro-Shaikh Wahan July 6,2003

Mian Channu-Sahiwal (RMP) January 18,2003

Mian Channu-Sahiwal (RSP) December 24,2002

Sahiwal-Okara November 5,2003

Lahore-Gujranwala February 20,2003

Kharian-Rawalpindi December 2 1,2002

Turnol- Chablat

The census investigation revealed that 459 commercial units are currently owned or rented by individual commercial traders within the CoI of the Mor-Ranipur, Ubaur-Shaikh Wahan, Lahore- Gujranwala and Turnol-Chablat sections. The total number of PAPs, therefore, is 458. They are assisted by a further 77 family members and/or employ 40 squatter-employees. There are no residential structures falling within the CoI of any of these sections. The remaining sections, i.e., Mian Channu-Sahiwal, Sahiwal-Okara and Kharian-Rawalpindi are not bordere~d by any resident population or commercial activity within the CoI. Accordingly, this section presents data only for the Mor-Ranipur, Ubauro-Shaikh Wahan and Lahore-Gujranwala sections.


d&&+&e SMEC Resettlement Issues %8!Vi#

2.9 Distribution of Project-Affected Persons

The distribution of PAPs is summarized in Table 2.7 below.

Table 2.7: Distribution of Project-Affected Households

UbauroShaikh Lahore- Tarn01 - Chablat TL,tal Definition of PAP Moro-Ranipur Wahan Gujranwala

Total 28 62 316 52 458

Only squatter-owners and squatter-tenants are entitled to compensation under the rlesettlement action plan matrix discussed in Section 6. As indicated in Table 2.7, 28 squatters are settled within the CoI of the Morc-Ranipur section, 62 on the Ubaurc-Shaikh Wahan section, 316 on the Lahore- Gujranwala section and 52 squatters on the Tarnol - Chablat section.

In addition to the documented squatter-owners and tenants, some 53 absentee squatter-owners own commercial structures rented out to the squatter-tenants settled along these sections (under the RP Entitlement Matrix, absentee owners are entitled to compensation for assets/stru~ctures imapcted). Annex 2 provides a detailed profile of the businesses operated by PAPs along these sections.

2.9.1 Income Patterns and Vulnerability

The survey data on annual total and per capita income was analyzed in order to determine PAPs' potential loss of income when displaced by the project without their income source being restored. The average annual income per PAP was calculated to be Rs 49,140, or Rs 6,467' per capita. This varies between Rs 5,187 along the Ubaurc-Shaikh Wahan section, and Rs 6,952 along the Lahore- Gujranwala section. (see details in table 2.8)

Table 2.8: Income and Vulnerability Status of Project-Affected Persons

Definition of PAP No. of PAPS

Moro-Ranipur

UbauroShaikh Wahan

5,069 88 - - -- - .................................... - - - .. -

Subtotal 62 2,476,974 37,845 5,187 69

Lahore-Gujranwala

Subtotal 134 8,088,788 53,427 6,952 65

Total 264 12,036,560 49,140 6,467 66

506501 9 - Contract Administration and Construction Supervision for Highway Rehabilitation Project - Pakistan N5 (Phase II) Resettlement Action Plan, November 2007 Page 2-8

&$&$I ,i S$~EC Resettlement Issues X%!V&

Subtotal figures for income per PAP, per capita and extent of vulnerability are weighted averages

Recent studies in Pakistan mark the average income at the poverty line at Rs 7,800 per person per year. Based on this benchmark and the average household size of each section (see Table 2.1), PAPs who earn an annual income less than Rs 7,800 per person have been classified as 'vulnerable' (see Annex 2 for the individual monthly income of each PAP). Table 2.8 indicates that: 66% of the total number of PAPs settled along the Phase I1 sections fall under this category.

2.10 Commercial Structures Within CoI

A total of 458 structures were documented in the CoI 1. All are commercial units and include three shops, 11 thatched sheds, 84 kiosks, 109 mobile-vendor units, and 17 milk vendors based under a bridge on the Lahore-Gujranwala section. Table 2.9 provides a section-wise breakdown of these structures.

Table 2.9 Squatters' Structures Within CoI 1 of Phase I1 Sections

Within Col I Section Chainage (km) Town/Village Total

S K TS

MorwRanipur 381 Halani - 1 -

(Cut off date 22 March '03) 390 Kotri Kabir 1 - 3 - 2 - l 5 3 93 Rasoolabad 1 1 1 - - 1 2

399 Hingorja 1 - 5 1 6 - 1 12

UbaurwShaikh Wahan 604 Kamon Shaheed 1 7 4 7 - 1 19

Scattered - 1 2 .......... ...... .................. .....................

..................................................... . - - .... - - ..... - .. (Cut off date 6 July 2003) 61 1 Kot Sabzal 1 - 2 - 10 - 1 12

Subtotal

....... .............................................. ..........................

630 Macchi Goth I - - 4

1 10 2 15 - 28

653 Shakeelabad 1 - - 5 1 - l 6

- l 3

662-663 Fatehpur 1 - 2 - 1 - l 3 .................... ...........................................

666-667 Iqbalabad 1 - - - 16 - 1 16

Scattered 1 - 2 - - l 2 - ............... ....................

Subtotal I .... .... ....... ........ ...................... - ... .--- ...

1 13 9

1270 Imamia Colony 1 7 -

1271 Rachna Town I - -

1274 Rana Town 1 - 6 - - l 6 1282 Ravi Rayan 1 - 1 - 8 - 1283 Munnooabad I - 1 - 6 -

I -- .....................

1286-1288 Muridke 1 - 19 - 4 - 23

1299-1304 Sadhoki


Reselttlement Issues

1305-1306 Kamonki 10 - I 14

Section Chainage (km) TownNillage

1315-1319 Moremanabad 1 - 5 - 3 - l 8

Within CoI 1 Total

S K TS

Scattered 1 - 4 - 2 - l 6 "

Subtotal [ I 61 - 55 17 1134

(Cut off date 29 April '05) 1305-1306 Kamoke

Lahore-Gujranwala (Additional with 1286- 1288 Muridke changed development strategy)

1 Subtotal 1 ti 176 1182

6 110

Turnol- Chablat (No disruption with 1570-1571 Taxila previous strategy. Effect occurred due to changed development strategy)

(Cut off date 12 March '05)

Subtotal

a Squatters (milk vendors) settled under a bridge within the median on the Lahore-Gujranwala section

Total

S: Shop K: Kiosk (khokha)

3 90 11 337 17 4 5 8

TS: Thatched shed V: Vendor

As shown in Table 2.9, there are a total of 28 structures located within the CoI of the Moro-Ranipur section, 62 on the Ubauro-Shaikh Wahan section, 283 on the Lahore-Gujranwala section and 52 on the section of road between Tarn01 and Chablat.. Of a total of 458 structures, 444 (including 90 kiosks) are mobile and can be shifted further back from the CoI within the ROW without incurring any damage. The NHA will compensate and help resettle the owners of a further 14 structures (three on the Moro-Ranipur section, ten on the Ubaur-Shaikh Wahan section, and one on the Lahore- Gujranwala section) that need to be dismantled.

5065019 - Contract Administration and Construction Supervision for Highway Rehabilitation Project - Pakistan N5 (Phase II) Resettlement Action Plan, November 2007 Page 2-1 0

Resettlement Issues

2.10.1 Value of Affected Structures

Table 2.10 indicates the total value of structures located on the affected sections under Phase 11. The collective estimated value of structures along these sections amounts to Rs 1.307 million.

Table 2.10: Present Values of PAP-Owned Structures

Structure Type No. of Structures Total Estimated Value (Rs)

MoreRanipur

Shops

Shop + thatched sheds

Thatched sheds 2 12,000

Kiosks 10 120,000

Mobile vendor units 15 12,500 . -. ... - -, ................. - - - - - - - -. - - - . -- Subtotal 28 164,500

Ubaurdhaikh Wahan

Shops 2 -

23,000 .......... - -.

...................................... - - ...........

Thatched sheds 8 106,000

Kiosks 13 243,500

Mobile vendor units 39 25,600

Subtotal .........................

62 --.

398,100

L

Shops 1 14,000

Shop + thatched sheds

Thatched sheds - -- - - - - .- - -. .. - -

Kiosks 67 745,000

Vendors 23 1 227,000

Misc. (milk vendors operating within median) 17

Subtotal 316 987,000

Turn01 - Chablat -............. - ..... -- ............................... -- .............................. - - ....................................... - - - .................. - - - . - .- ..........

Vendors 52 5 1,000

Subtotal 52 51,000

Total 458 1,600,600

5065019 - Contract Administration and Construction Supervision for Highway Rehabilitation Project - Pakistan N5 (Phase II) Resettlement Action Plan, November 2007 Page 2-1 1

3 LEGAL FRAMEWORK

Legal Framework

3.1 General

The Pakistan Highway Rehabilitation Project (PHRP) falls under the regulatory requirements as set by the national resettlement policies and operational policies of the World Bank. As far as the legal framework is concerned, at this point, the only legislation relating to land acquisition and compensation is the Land Acquisition Act (LAA) of 1894. Taking into account the requirements of the LAA, and World Bank policies, an entitlement matrix was developed to define compensation for the acquisition of land and built-up property and for resettling PAPs operating within the CoI, and therefore subject to involuntary relocation. These are briefly discussed in the subsequent sections.

Sub-paragraph 17.4 is redundant vis a vis this project.

3.2 Land Acquisition Act of 1894

There is no specific policy on resettlement in Pakistan. The Land Acquisition Act of 1894 (LAA) deals with all aspects of land acquisition while the resettlement issues are addressed on a project-by-project basis under special provisions made by the concerned C;overnment. The LAA mainly prescribes provisions for fair and adequate compensation to land for legal title holders whose land has been acquired. The LAA "Section 23" specifically provides for awarding compensation on the following considerations: (i) market value of acquired land; (ii) damage caused to standing crops and trees; (iii) damage caused by reason of severance of the acquired land from the affected persons other land; (iv) damage sustained by the affected persons by reason of the acquisition injuriously affecting their other property, moveable or immovable; (v) entitlement to reasonable expenses if compelled to change residence or place of business; (vi) payment for damages resulting from diminution of profits of land till the Collector's taking possession of the land.

The LAA covers several of the principles of compensation laid out in the Bank's Operational Policy (OP) 4.12. However, the LAA restricts benefits to only those with legal title. So, in the absence of an appropriate formal national policy to assist non-titled persons, a project-specific entitlement matrix has been prepared. This matrix largely reflects the articles contained in the LAA. However, to ensure consistency with the Bank's policy requirements, the list of articles has been expanded to ensure rights and entitlements for PAPs not holding land title.

3.3 World Bank Safeguard Policies

The objective of Bank's safeguard policies is to:

Reduce and manage adverse risks of development projects

Identify opportunities for promoting social and environmental benefits

Provide a process for full disclosure and meaningful stakeholder consultation


Legal Framework

Ensure that social and environmental risks are systematically addressed, evaluated and incorporated at various stages of the project, such as decision-making, design, construction and operation.

To ensure that affectees are better off or at least at the same level as they were prior to the project intervention.

3.3.1 Involuntary Resettlement (Operational Policy OP 4.12)

Bank experience indicates that involuntary resettlement under development projects, if unmitigated, often gives rise to severe economic, social, and environmental risks: production systems are dismantled; people face impoverishment when their productive assets or income sources are lost; people are relocated to environments where their productive skills may be less applicable and the competition for resources greater; community institutions and social networks are weakened; kin groups are dispersed; and cultural identity, traditional authority, and the potential for mutual help are diminished or lost. This policy includ~es safeguards to address and mitigate these impoverishment risks.

Involuntary resettlement may cause severe long-term hardship, impoverishment, and environmental damage unless appropriate measures are carefully planned and carried out. For these reasons, the overall objectives of the Bank's policy on involuntary resettlement are the following:

Involuntary resettlement should be avoided upto the possible limit or minimized by exploring other viable alternatives;

Where it is not feasible to avoid, resettlement, resettlement activities should be conceived and executed as sustainable development program, providing sufficient investment resources to enable the persons displaced by the project to share in project benefits;

Displaced persons should be assisted in their efforts to improve their livelihood and standards of living or at least restore to the extent of pre-displacement levels.

This policv is tri~cered

The prescribed responses to adverse impacts are presented in the form ol? an Entitlement Matrix. (See below Table 5.1).

3.3.2 Cultural Property (Operational Policy OP 4.11)

Operational Policy (OP) 4.11 normally declined to finance the projects which will significantly damaged non-replicable cultural property. The bank will assist in protection and enhancement of cultural properties rather than leaving it to chance. In some cases the project is such located in order to preserve the sites and structures. In some case the selective salvage and preservation before the destruction or shifting is necessary. The strengthening of institution is of utmost importance. Only deviations may be justified where expected benefits or much more than the loss or damages to the cultural properties. However, in the case of discovery of such sites which are of h~istorical, cultural, archaeological or religious importance during the project execution.


Legal Framework

The World Bank's general policy regarding cultural properties is to assist in their preservation, and to seek to avoid their elimination. Specifically:

(a) The Bank normally declines to finance projects that will significantlly damage non- replicable cultural property, and will assist only those projects that are sited or designed so as to prevent such damage.

(b) The Bank will assist in the protection and enhancement of cultural properties encountered in Bank-financed projects,

Most such projects should include the training and strengthening of institutions entrusted with safeguarding a nation's cultural patrimony. Such activities should be directly included in the scope of the project, rather than being postponed for some possible future action, and the costs are to be internalized in computing overall project costs.

This policy pertains to any project in which the Bank is involved, irrespective of whether the Bank is itself financing the part of the project that may affect cultural property.

This policy is not triggered

However, should the Policy get triggered during implementation the Project will ensure that the Contractor protects the item, stops work and contacts !.he relevant government agency and hands over the cultural property/artefact/chance find.

3.3.3 Projects on International Waterways (Operational Policy OP 7.50)

This policy applies to the following types of international waterways:

(a) any river, canal, lake, or similar body of water that forms a boundary between, or any river or body of surface water that flows through, two or more states,, whether Bank1 members or not;

(b) any tributary or other body of surface water that is a component of any waterway described in (a) above; and

(c) any bay, gulf, strait, or channel bounded by two or more states or, if within one state, recognized as a necessary channel of cornrnunicatio~n between the open sea and other states-and any river flowing into such waters.

This policy applies to the following types of projects:

(a) hydroelectric, irrigation, flood control, navigation, drainage, water and sewerage, industrial, and similar projects that involve the use or potential pollutiori of international waterways as described in para. 1 above; and (b) detailed design and engineering studies of projects under para. 2(a) above, including those to be carried out by the Bank as executing agency or in any other capacity.

Projects on international waterways may affect relations between the Bank and its borrowers and between states (whether members of the Bank or mot). The Bank recognizes that the cooperation and goodwill of riparians is essential for the efficient use and protection of the waterway. Therefore, it attaches great importance to riparians' making appropriate agreements or arrangements for these purposes for the entire waterway or any part thereof. The Bank


&?.$:;%%$#\ qe3v)8S&IEC Legal Framework

stands ready to assist riparians in achieving this end. In cases where differences remain unresolved between the state proposing the project (beneficiary state) and the other riparians, prior to financing the project the Bank normally urges the beneficiary state to offer to negotiate in good faith with the other riparians to reach appropriate agreements or arrangements.


Indigenous Peoples (Operational Policy OP 4.10)

For purposes of this policy, the term "Indigenous Peoples" is used in a generic sense to refer to a distinct, vulnerable, social and cultural groupG possessing the following characteristics in varying degrees:

self-identification as members of a distinct indigenous cultural group and recognition of this identity by others;

collective attachment to geographically distinct habitats or ancestral territories in the project area and to the natural resources in these habitats and territorie~;~

customary cultural, economic, social, or political institutions that are separate from those of the dominant society and culture; and

an indigenous language, often different from the official language of the country or region.

This policy contributes to the Bank's mission of poverty reduction and sustainable development by ensuring that the development process fully respects the dignity, human rights, economies, and cultures of Indigenous Peoples. For all projects that are proposed for Bank financing and affect Indigenous Peoples, the Bank requires the borrower to engage in a process of free, prior, and informed consultation. The Bank provides project financing only where free, prior, and informed consultation results in broad community support to the project by the affected Indigenous Peoples. Such Bank-financed projects include measures to (a) avoid potentially adverse effects on the Indigenous Peoples' communiti~es; or (b) when avoidance is not feasible, minimize, mitigate, or compensate for such effects. Bank-financed projects are also designed to ensure that the Indigenous Peoples receive sociial and economic benefits that are culturally appropriate and gender and inter-generation inclusive.

This policv is not triggered. The Social Assessment did not find evidence of indigenous people in the vicinity of the road. However, the situation will be monitored during project implementation. If any IPS are identified during project implementation the Project will prepare an Indigenous Peoples Development Plan, have it cleared by the Bank and subsequently implemented.


&*$%$, \L~;&SMEC Legal Framework

3.3.4 Gender and Development (GP/BP 4.20)

The objective of the Bank's gender and development policy is to assist member countries to reduce poverty and enhance economic growth, human well-being, and development effectiveness by addressing the gender disparities and inequalities that are barriers to development, and by assisting member countries in formulating and implementing their gender and development goals.

To this end, the Bank periodically assesses the gender dimensions of development within and across sectors in the countries in which it has an active assistance progrsun. This gender assessment informs the Bank's policy dialogue with the member country.

The Bank's Country Assistance Strategy (CAS) draws on and discusses the findings of the gender assessment.

In sectors and thematic areas where the CAS has identified the need for gender-responsive interventions, the Bank's assistance to the country incorporates measures designed to address this need. Projects in these sectors and thematic areas are designed to adequately take into account the gender implications of the project.

The Bank regularly monitors the implementation of this policy.

3.3.5 Environmental Assessment (Operational Policy OP 4.01)

The Bank requires environmental assessment (EA) of projects proposed for Bank financing to help ensure that they are environmentally sound and sustainable, and thus to improve decision making.

EA is a process whose breadth, depth, and type of analysis depend on the nature, scale, and potential environmental impact of the proposed project. EA evaluates a project's potential environmental risks and impacts in its area of influence; examines project alternatives; identifies ways of improving project selection, siting, planning, design, and implementation by preventing, minimizing, mitigating, or compensating for adverse environmental impacts and enhancing positive impacts; and includes the process of mitigating and managing adverse environmental impacts throughout project implementation. The Bank favors preventive measures over mitigatory or compensatory measures, whenever feasible.

EA takes into account the natural environment (air, water, and land); human health and safety; social aspects (involuntary resettlement, indigenous peoples, and physical cultural resources; and trans-boundary and global environmental aspects. EA considers natural and social aspects in an integrated way. It also takes into account the variations in project and country conditions; the findings of country environmental studies; national environmental action plans; the country's overall policy framework, national legislation, and institutional capabilities related to the environment and social aspects; and obligations of the country, ~ert~aining to project activities, under relevant international environmental treaties and agreements;. The Rank does not finance project activities that would contravene such country obligations, as identified during the EA. EA is initiated as early as possible in project processing and is integrated


Lg$''g&i, .gw$w e ., Sh:i EC Legal Framework

closely with the economic, financial, institutional, social, and technical analyses of a proposed project.

This policy is triggered and an EIA and Sa have be prepared along with an EMF

3.3.6 Forests (Operational Policy OP 4.36)

The management, conservation, and sustainable development of forest ecos~rstems and their associated resources are essential for lasting poverty reduction and sustainable development, whether located in countries with abundant forests or in those with depleted or naturally limited forest resources. The objective of this policy is to assist borrowers to harness the potential of forests to reduce poverty in a sustainable manner, integrate forests effectively into sustainable economic development, and protect the vital local and global environmental services and values of forests.

Where forest restoration and plantation development are necessary to meet these objectives, the Bank assists borrowers with forest restoration activities that maintain or enhance biodiversity and ecosystem functionality. The Bank also assists borrowers with the establishment and sustainable management of environmentally appropriate, socially beneficial, and economically viable forest plantations to help meet growing demands for forest goods and services.


3.3.7 Pest Management (Operational Policy 4.09)

In assisting borrowers to manage pests that affect either agriculture or public health, the Bank supports a strategy that promotes the use of biological or environmental contirol methods and reduces reliance on synthetic chemical pesticides. In Bank-financed projects, the borrower addresses pest management issues in the context of the project's environ-mental assessment.

In appraising a project that will involve pest management, the Bank assesses the capacity of the country's regulatory framework and institutions to promote and support safe, effective, and environmentally sound pest management. As necessary, the Bank and the borrower incorporate in the project components to strengthen such capacity.

This policv is not triggered

3.3.8 Safety of Dams (Operational Policy OP 4.37)

When the Bank-begins processing a project that includes a dam, the processing team includes individuals who have relevant experience in dam engineering and in preparatioin and supervision of previous Bank-funded projects that have included dams. If such individuals are not available within the Region, the task team (TT) consults the Rural Development Department for referral to appropriate specialists inside or outside the Bank.


&%?& 9j:IEC V U , F ~ ~ L .L Legal Framework

Bank projects involving dams are processed according to the procedures set forth in BP1O.OO, Investment Lending: Identification to Board Presentation.

As soon as a project involving a dam is identified, the TT discusses with the borrower the Bank's policy on dam safety (OP 4.37).


3.3.9 Projects in Disputed Areas (Operational Policy (OP) 7.60)

Projects in disputed areas may raise a number of delicate problems affecting rlelations not only between the Bank and its member countries, but also between the country in which the project is carried out and one or more neighbouring countries. In order not to prejudice the position of either the Bank or the countries concerned, any dispute over an area in which a proposed project is located is dealt with at the earliest possible stage.

The Bank may support a project in a disputed area if the governments concerned agree that, pending the settlement of the dispute, the project proposed for country A should go forward without prejudice to the claims of country B.


3.3.10 Natural Habitats (Operational Policy (OP 4.04)

The conservation of natural habitats, like other measures that protect and enhance the environment, is essential for long-term sustainable development. The Bank therefore supports the protection, maintenance, and rehabilitation of natural habitats and their functions in its economic and sector work, project financing, and policy dialogue. The Bank supports, and expects borrowers to apply, a precautionary approach to natural resource management to ensure opportunities for environmentally sustainable development.

The Bank's economic and sector work includes identification of (a) natural h~abitat issues and special needs for natural habitat conservation, including the degree of threat to identified natural habitats (particularly critical natural habitats); and (b) measures for protecting such areas in the context of the country's development strategy. As appropriate, Country Assistance Strategies and projects incorporate findings from such economic and sector work.

The Bank promotes and supports natural habitat conservation and improved land use by financing projects designed to integrate into national and regional clevelopment the conservation of natural habitats and the maintenance of ecological functions. Furthermore, the Bank promotes the rehabilitation of degraded natural habitats.

The Bank does not support projects that, in the BankL1s opinion, involve the significant conversion or degradation of critical natural habitats.



Legal Framework

3.4 Other National Environment- Social Related Statutes

This section outlines statutes apart from the Pakistan Environmental Protection Act, 1997, which are relevant to the project.

3.4.1 Government of Punjab, Forestry, Wildlife, Fisheries and Tourism Department (Notification No. FOFT (EXT) VIII. 17/96 :I998

In Punjab, should the number of trees to be felled for a project exceed 100, or if the project falls within the jurisdiction of more than one district, a committee comprising the Commissioner of the division covering the districts, the Conservator of !Forests, and the Superintending Engineer of the government department concerned must accord their approval. In this case, given that the NHA is the owner of the ROW and itself the department concerned, and that the project covers more than one district, the committee will consist of the Commissioner and the Conservator of Forests only.

3.4.2 Provincial Wildlife (Protection, Preservation, Conservation and Management) Acts, Ordinances and Rules (Sindh 1972 and Punjab 1974)

In addition to empowering provincial wildlife departments to establish game reserves, parks, and wildlife sanctuaries, these acts regulate the hunting and disturbance of wildlife. While reviewing the ETA, the Sindh EPA and Punjab EPD may consult their respective provincial wildlife departments in case the project has an impact on wildlife. 'The EPAs may require the hTHA to coordinate the implementation and monitoring of project impacts with the provincial wildlife departments.

3.4.3 Antiquities Act, 1975

The Antiquities Act relates to the protection, preservation and conservation of archaeological/historical sites and monuments. It prohibits construction (or any other damaging) activity within 200 m of such sites unless prior permission is obtained from the Federal Department of Archaeology and Museums. The Antiquities Act also binds the project proponent to notify the department should anything of archaeological value be excavated during project construction.

3.5 Others

The Local Government Ordinances, 2001

These ordinances, issued following the devolution process, establish regulatiorns for land use, the conservation of natural vegetation, air, water, and land pollution, the disposal of solid waste and wastewater effluents, as well as matters related to public health and safety.

The Regulation of Mines and Oil Fields and Mineral Development Act, 1948

This legislation provides regulatory procedures for the quarrying and mining of construction material on state-owned as well as private land.

The Motor Vehicles Ordinance, 1965, and Rules, 1969

The Motor Vehicles Ordinance, 1965, was extended in 1978, to the whole of Pakistan. The ordinance deals with the powers of motor vehicle licensing authorities and empowers the Road


Lelgal Framework

Transport Corporation to regulate traffic rules, vehicle speed and weight limits, and vehicle use; to erect traffic signs; and to identifj, the specific duties of drivers in the case of accidents. It also describes the powers of police officers to check and penalize traffic offenders; at the provincial level. At the same time, the ordinance also empowers the Regional Translport Authority to operate as a quasi-judicial body at the district level to monitor road trzmsport, licensing requirements, and compensations for death or injury to passengers on public carriers. The NHA is required to coordinate with the Road Transport Corporation at the design stage, and with the Road Transport Authority in the operation phase of the project to ensure that the requirements of these agencies relating to the safety and management of traffic on the highways are met.

The Factories Act, 1934

The clauses relevant to the project are those that concern the health, safety and welfare of workers, disposal of solid waste and effluent, and damage to private and public property. The Factories Act also provides regulations for handling and disposing of toxic and hazardous materials. Given that construction activity is classified as 'industry', these regulations will be applicable to the project contractors.

The High ways Safety Ordinance, 2000

This ordinance includes provisions for the licensing and registration of vehicles and construction equipment; maintenance of road vehicles; traffic control, offences, penalties and procedures; and the establishment of a police force for motorways and national highways charged with regulating and controlling traffic on the national highways, and keeping the Ilighways clear of encroachments.

The Pakistan Penal Code, 1860

The Pakistan Penal Code deals with offences where public or private property andlor human lives are affected due to the intentional or accidental misconduct of an individual or body of people. In the context of environment, the Penal Code empowers the local authorities to control noise, noxious emissions and disposal of effluents. The EJEQS enforced by the EPAs supersede the application of this legislation on industries and municipalities. The Penal Code, however, can provide a basis for the NHA to coordinate its activities with the local authorities to ensure that its construction activities do not become a cause of public nuisance or inconvenience.

- The Explosives Act, 1884

Under the Explosives Act, the project contractors are bound by regulations on handling, transportation and using explosives during quarrying, blasting, and other purposes.


4 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION AND CONSULTATION

4.1 Public Consultation and Disclosure Plan (PCDP)

A programme designed to facilitate Public Consultation and Disclosure will be implemented at stages throughout RP implementation and engineering works. It will focus on the following objectives:

To share information with stakeholder on the proposed improvement works and the expected impact on the physical, biological and socio-economic environment of the project corridor. To obtain information about needs and priorities of the affected people, as well as information about their reactions to proposed policies and activities. To provide affected people with opportunity to express their respective concerns and aspirations about compensation, allowances and possible opportunities for economic development. To obtain the co-operation and participation of the affected people and communities in resettlement planning and implementation. To ensure transparency in all activities related to land acquisition, resettlement and rehabilitation.

4.2 Structure

Activities that make up the PCDP process are planned for impleme~itation amongst stakeholders in three domains: at National, regional and field project levels. The process is in two stages, comprising i) disclosure of the project; and ii) public consultation regarding social implications of project implementation. See Annex 3

At national level the stakeholders involved in the process include, amongst others, officials from concerned government departments and agencies (for example: Environment, Public Works and Agriculture), representatives from financing agencies in addition to senior project personnel.

At regional level participants are District or local government representatives, members of non-governmental agencies and interest groups, haulage contractors, weighbridge operators, future suppliers of materials andlor technical inputs, local community representatives, future site contractors, project agents.

Local field or project site level consultations will be conducted amongst PAPs (including women and vulnerable groups), project spokespersons, community leadeirs (for example: mosque committee) representatives of the various categories of PAPs, project agents.

4.3 Background:

The formal requirement for the PCDP process is of recent origin in Pakistan. Most of its component activities, however, have frequently been completed as a regular part of project implementation for several years. During recent yeairs, with a growing concern over environmental and social issues, the need to prepare and execute a .well-formed and

5065019 - Contract Administration and Construction Supervision for Highway Rehabilitation Project - Pakistan

N5 (Phase II) Resettlement Action Plan, November 2007 4-1

&Gi%%s~ EC T ~ Y qht Resettlement Impacts

comprehensive public relations programme has become such a formal requirement as a condition of support from major financial agencies.

4.4 Project Affected Persons (PAPS)

Project stakeholders are those people, or groups of people, either directly or indirectly affected by the project, or have an interest in the project. Project Affected Persons (PAPs) are households identified as a result of the census as likely to be adversely affected during either preparation or subsequent operation of the Project.

4.5 Project Stakeholders

Project Stalteholders are those people, or groups of people having an interest in project preparation, operation and performance. This category of interested parties includes that of PAPs. It also includes those who either have a stake in the project, for example: government agencies and those whose actions and behaviour could facilitate or hinder the project. Further, it will include both primary and secondary stakeholders, including women, young people, disabled and other vulnerable groups, (ethnic) minorities, etc.

4.6 PCDP Action Process:

In the present context, an 'action process' describes the procedures fix- involving all stakeholders in developing both the terms and conditions of the Resettlement Action Plan and the circumstances under which the Plan will be implemented. Agents appointed by the project will of course, direct the 'process'. The participatory nature of procedures will, however, ensure that all stakeholders and PAPs will work together to facilitate overall project implementation. (See Annex 1).

PCDP requirements shall include the following details:

Brief introduction, including a short description of the Project; = Review of the legal context related with public consultation (both in-country and

international requirements) for the SEA;

Review of previous public consultation and disclosure related to the project, including a summary of the issues discussed;

Identification and description of stakeholders in the Project (affectled and impacted villages - village leaders and the general population, relevant Government authorities at local, haulage contractors and federal level, civil society organizations, including NGOs, village leaders, international stakeholders);

Identification of key issues and concerns identified by stakeholders;

Development of the community engagement strategy and action plan for the whole project life (development, construction, operation), including communication methods applicable to each identified target group, detailed scheduling of activities during the RAP phase, resources and implementation arrangements (personnel, community information centre, etc.); Development of the public disclosure strategy at local, regionall, national, and international levels, including the use of a web site and other means of disseminating information;



.tgdigi%tsL~ F,C :@ ::$.a?$$ s+&44?j3q Resettlement Impacts

= Development of a grievance management mechanism; and,

Implementation details, responsibilities, and schedule.

Close liaison with local authorities will be maintained for the development and implementation of public consultation activities.

4.7 Brief of consultations

The Association of Road Users of Pakistan (ARUP) organized a series of regional discussions in 2000 that provided valuable inputs for the project design. Subsequently, stakeholder workshops were organized by the EIA consultants in 2001 to discuss project-specific issues.

Four initial General Stakeholders' Workshops early in the PCDP process: two in Hyderabad; one each in Lahore and Gujranwala, at which a total of 3711 people parti~ipate~d.

The EIA consultants organized two regional stakeholders' meetings in the initial stages of the PHRP: one in Hyderabad for Sindh-based stakeholders, and another in Lahore for Punjab- based stakeholders. The participants included government and NGO representatives, environmental field specialists, engineers, road contractors, highway users, and a cross- section of project-affected persons (PAPs), such as roadside vendors and shopkeepers, squatters, and petrol pump dealers. The meetings were publicized with the help of the district administration, union councils, personal contacts, and broadcast media.

At both workshops, participants were made aware of the purpose of the wor:kshop, the scope of highway improvement works, and probable impact of constructiorl activities and subsequent operation of the highway with reference to PAPs. A group of' field specialists explained the technical and environmental aspects of the project in more detail. Finally, participants were distributed into groups to formulate and irecord their concenis. Each group's concerns were discussed with all the participants in general, followed by a question-answer session.

A range of issues were raised during these sessions, many of which reflected public concerns about road transport in general; road safety in particular. For example, peolple do recognize the importance of road lay-out and alignment, the avoidance of steep comers and unnecessary U turns. Adequate drainage was also mentioned on a number of occasions. Similarly, there was a widely expressed opinion that much more should be done to educate drivers in road safety issues and a need to introduce more legislation alongside raising police capacity for law enforcement. Details of these findings can be seen in Annex 1.

Subsequently, thirty scoping sessions were convened involving around 1,:500 participants. These sessions were scattered throughout all seven sections of road along which project construction works would be undertaken.

Nine roadside public consultations were held with membeirs of the public.

Details of these PCDP sessions and of issues raised can be found in Annex 1.



@F~SMEC \' . Resettlement Impacts

5 RESETTLEMENT IMPACTS

5.1 Project Impacts

It is anticipated that, over the long-term, the project will contribute favourable impacts. It will facilitate economic development and promote improvement in living standards both in the immediate project areas and also nationally. Project construction works, however, will also have negative impacts. Extensive project-related documentation - Environmental Assessment), Environmental Management Plan (EMP), Social Assessment (SA) have been prepared both to identify the range and severity of these adverse impacts but also to set out measures to mitigate negative socio-environmental impacts.

A principle of World Bank policy is to minimize resettlement. Hence, the NHIP have examined all available design options for the final design of pro-ject to avoid or, where that is not possible, to minimize displacement and other adverse social impacts. In cases where residual adverse social impacts are still anticipated a Resettlement Action Plan must be prepared prescribing the means and costs of mitigate these negative impacts.

This RAP has been developed by the Project. It contains an Entitlement Matrix complete with eligibility criteria of PAPs, entitlements, modes of compensation and rehabilitation. The Project will seek NHIP and Bank approval for the RAP prior to implementation.

5.2 Scope of Resettlement Action Planning

This Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) aims to ensure that all PAPs are hlly (compensated for any project-related acquisition or damage to private assets and those sufficient measures are taken to provide relocation services and economic rehabilitation assistance for project PAPs.

A comprehensive RAP ensures compliance with Bank resettlement policy, as articulated in OP 4.12. Compliance is ensured by preparation of an entitlement matrix. This matrix is based on the findings of a social assessment. The assessment is informed by analysis of information collected by social survey amongst communities to be impacted by subsequent implementation of project works. Such an analysis will develop categories of adverse impact likely to be suffered by households in these communities. It is precisely these categories of adverse impact, each with number of respective affectees, which ensures compliance of the project with the Bank's policies.

5.3 Corridor of Impact

For the purposes of the HRP, the Corridor of Impact (Col[) is formally defined as the edge of the newly designed road embankment, cut-section or road structure plus the Safety corridor2, measured with the following distances:

Safety Corridor defined here is in accordance with NHA Decree 59211 999lQD-GTVT of 11 March 1999



. " V & E % ~ V E C r" "IPTI k&bL:a3@kJ~ A Resettlement Impacts

1.5 meters along both sides of roads in designated urban areas;

3.0 meters in designated rural areas; and

3.0-7.0 meters along both sides of roads for bridges (depending on the specific features of each bridge).

Analysis of this data enables subsequent determination of respective PAPS compensation and entitlements based on the policies outlined in Chapter 3 (above

5.4 Resettlement Issues

With few exceptions, population distribution is characteristically ribbon development along both sides of project roads. As such, a majority of households are situated within the Corridor of Impact.

The Social Assessment (SA) survey discovered a total of 458 structures in -the COI. All are commercial units and include three shops, 11 thatched sheds, 90 kiosks, 337 mobile-vendor units and 17 milk vendors based under a bridge on the Lahore - Gujranwala 1j.nk.

Of 136 structures located within the ROW of the Moro-Ranipur section, 28 structures, fall in the CoI 1 and will be affected,

Of 112 structures located within the ROW of the Ubauro-Shaikh Wahan section, 62 will be affected.

Of 750 structures located within the ROW of the Lahore-Gujranwala section, 316 will be affected. As well as 17 milk vendors who rear their animals under a bridge om this section.

Of 150 squatters falling within the ROW of Turnol-Chablat Section, 52 will be affected, all of them being mobile vendors.

No squatters are located in COI of Okara-Sahiwal-Mianchannu section and Gujranwala- Kharian section hence these are not listed.


N5 (Phase I I ) Resettlement Action Plan, November 2007 5-5

Resettllement Im~acts

Table 5.1 Squatters' Structures Within CoI of Phase I1 Sections

Section

I

Mor+Ranipur 381 Halani - 1 - 5 - I6

Within CoI I Chainage (km) Town/Village l K T s v

Misc.

(Cut off date 22 March '03) 390 Kotri Kabir 1 - 3 - 2

Total

393 Rasoolabad 1 1 - - . .................. ---

- 5 1 6 ................................. .........

Scattered - 1 2

Subtotal 11 10 2 15 - 128

UbaureShaikh Wahan 604 Kamon Shaheed / 1 7 4 7 - 119 ............................. .................... ........................... ...... .............

(Cut off date 6 July 2003) 61 1 Kot Sabzal 1 - 2 - 10 - 1 12

63 0 Macchi Goth I - - 4 " -

653 Shakeelabad - 5 1 1 - .---

662-663 Fatehpur I - 2 - 1 ... . -- ...............................

666-667 Iqbalabad 16 - 116 .- ........................... ............................

Scattered 1 - 2 -

Subtotal

......... . ................... strategy) 1271 Rachna Town I - 4 - 1

(Cut off date 20 February 2003)

......... .... ............................. -- 1282 Ravi Rayan 8

............................................ -- 1274 Rana Town 1 - 6 - -

1283 Munnooabad 1 - 1 - 6 - 1 7

6

1286-1288 Muridke 1 - 19 - 4 - 123 . ..........................

1299-1304 Sadhoki 1 - 10 - 18 - 128

1305-1306 Kamonki I - 4 - 10 - 114

1315-1319 Moremanabad 1 - 5 - 3 - 18

Scattered 2 ................. ----- ....................................... - " -- ........... "

Subtotal 1 1 61 - 55 17 1134

Lahore-Gujranwala (Additional with 1286- 1288 Muridke changed development strategy)

(Cut off date 29 April '05) 1305-1306 Kamoke

1 Subtotal 116 1182



@&%!%E: s M EC "&B"< q& Resettllement Impacts

Turnol- Chablat (No disruption with 1570-1571 Taxila

Section Chainage (km) TownWillage

previous strategy. Effect occurred due to changed development strategy)

Within CoI I Total

S K TS V Misc.

(Cut off date 12 March '05)

Subtotal I 52

S:Shop K: Kiosk (khokha)

Total

TS:Thatched shed V: Vendor

3 90 11

5.5 Loss of crops and trees

a Squatters (milk vendors) settled under a bridge within the median on the Lahore-Gujranwala section

5.6 Loss of Public Infrastructure

A number (2,003) of concrete poles carrying electricity or telegraphic cables will need to be moved. The appropriate government authorities will be advised of this re:quirement. (See Table 5.2)

5.7 Loss of Culturally Significant Structures/Buildings

Table 5.2 Structures/Utilities Located Within CoI of Phase II Sections

Section

...... ...... ......

UbaurwShaikh Wahan 2 26 9 15 9 1 ............... ... .-- -. -. ......... ....

Mian Channu-Sahiwal-Okara - 5 15 3 8 28

Lahore-Gujranwala 2 74 1,250 78 163 439 41

Kharian-Rawalpindi

Tumol - Chablat b* " 1 8 299 25 168 14

Total 5 98 1,614 117 389 487 2 57

a Only the boundary wall will be affected.

Data from the supplementary EIA has been combined with SA I1 data to give the total figure for this section

" includes 24 poles (either electricity or telephone) that have been split 50150 between these two categories (ie 12 each)



&''>,* .t.I" ' ';$; & Ui 8$2g& /l'% @& .,i sM,Ec

">,. ~ * ? X Resettlement Impacts

5.8 Adverse Effect Due to Temporary Land Possession

PAPS with shops or businesses on their premises will be entitled to this allowance if their income is affected during the construction period.

An estimated 18 work sites will be developed: seven office/accommodation camps, each of around 2,500m2, and 11 smaller ancillary sites (including asphalt and cement works, storage and vehicle parking areas) each of around 1,000m2. This land will be temporarily leased by the Contractors.



8 @ j ~ ~ &@%3, SMEC @$jj]~p@ig *3 .q<

Resettlement Impacts

6 MITIGATION AND ENTITLEMENTS

6.1 Project Resettlement Principles

The basic resettlement principles and guidelines include the following:

The affected persons (APs) are defined as those who stand to 1o;se land, houses, structures, trees, crops, businesses, income and other assets as a corlsequence of the improvements andlor improvement of the project roads.

All APs are equally eligible for cash compensation and rehabilit,ation assistance, irrespective of their land ownership status, to ensure that those affected by the Project shall be at least as well off, if not better off, than they would have been without the Project. Absence of a title will not be a bar to receiving compensation and livelihood assistance, (except for land where a title is required).

All losses will be compensated at replacement cost, at market prices without deducting for depreciation and salvage value.

Encroachers in this context are defined as people occupying legal or customarily recognized properties on public space in the ROW.

Squatters are defined as those that occupy space that is legally or customarily someone else's, in this context the ROW.

The compensation packages shall reflect replacement costs for all losses (such as lands, crops, trees, structures, businesses, incomes, etc.).

Compensation and resettlement will be satisfactorily completed before a No-Objection Certificate can be provided by Gov. of Pakistan for award of civil works contracts.

APs will be systematically informed and consulted about the project, and RPs will be made available in both English and Urdu languages to the affected persons and communities.

The consultative process shall include not only those affected, but also the adjacent communities, representatives of the local governments of the areas where the project is located, community leaders, local governmerlt (districtltehsil), (and cornmunity- based organizations (CBOs). Vulnerable groups (households below the recognised poverty line; disabled, elderly persons or female headed households) should be identified and given appropriate assistance to substantially improve their living standards.

Physical construction will be initiated only following completion of ;all compensation payments.

In the absence of an emergency situation Section 17.4 of LAA (Emergency Provision) will not be invoked.



&'&&t ~ $ 1 EC \%ST& Resettlement Impacts

6.2 Eligibility and Project Entitlements

The Bank's resettlement policy prescribes compensation for lost assets at replacement costs to both titled and non-titled landholders and resettlement assistance for lost income and livelihoods. Absence of formal title does not constitute a bar to resettlement assistance and rehabilitation. Further, the principles adopted herein contain special measures and assistance for vulnerable APs, such as female-headed households, disabled persons, and households with incomes below the recognised poverty line. Only claimants holding land title will be eligible for compensation payments for land acquired by the project

Persons affected by land acquisition, and relocation andlor rehabilitation of structures/assets (SBEs, houses, etc.) are entitled to a combination of compensation measures and resettlement assistance, depending on the nature of ownership rights of lost assets and scope of the impact, including social and economic vulnerability of the affected persons. In general terms, the affected persons in the Project will be entitled to various types of compensation and resettlement assistance that will help in the restoration of their livelihoods, at least, to the pre- Project standards.

6.3 Loss of commercial structures

6.3.1 Squatter-owner operating business

Squatter-owners to be resettled within the ROW to re-establish their business in the vicinity of their original operating space. New kiosks (8 x 8 ft or equivalent) will be: constructed for eligible squatter-owners, i.e., whose structures cannot be moved out of the CoI and re- established hrther back in the ROW. Kiosks will be leased to eligible squatter-owners for a ten-year period, at Rs 400 per month3, without requiring any down payment

Owner allowed to salvage building materials. Assistance in shifting belongings1 salvageable material will be provided to all squatter-owners operating in the CoI 1

In exceptional circumstances where new kiosks are not provided at the itime of shifting, eligible squatter-owners will be exempted from lease payments for a period that is twice the disturbance period (i.e., the period from the date of shifting to the date of resettlement into the new kiosks)

In case new kiosks are not provided within two months of shifting, eligible squatter-owners will be provided livelihood assistance at the rate of Rs 5,000lmonth until sudi time as the new kiosks are made available.

3 (i) The lease rate covers provision of kiosk only; (ii) Lessees will make their own arrangements for electricity provision where needed, and bear related costs directly; (iii) where clusters of 10 or more kiosks are located in an urban area falling within the jurisdiction of a municipality, NHA will enter into an agreement with the concerned municipality for provision of water connection and sanitation services to these kiosks at prevailing municipal rates. Lessees will pay applicable charges directly to the municipality; (iv) at other locations, NHA will install a hand pump for provision of water - wherever there are two or more kiosks located together, without access to an existing water source within a distance of 50 meters. The lessees will be responsible for operation and maintenance of this facility, as well as for maintaining sanitary conditions in the vicinity of their kiosks. --



Resettlement Im~acts -

6.3.2 Squatter-tenant operating business

New kiosks (8 x 8 ft or equivalent) will be constructed for eligible squatter-tenants, i.e., whose structures cannot be moved out of the CoI and re-established further back in the ROW

Kiosks will be leased to eligible squatter-tenants for a ten-year period, at Rs 400 per month4, without requiring any down payment

In exceptional circumstances where new kiosks are not provided at the time of shifting, eligible squatter-tenants will be exempted fiom lease payments for a period that is twice the disturbance period (i.e., the period from the date of shifting to the date of resettlement into the new kiosks)

6.3.3 Vulnerable encroacher- owner or tenant operating business

Vulnerable encroacher- owner or tenant operating business will enjoy the same entitlements as squatter-tenants above, provided that the livelihood of the vulnerable encroacher-owner is adversely affected by the removal of the encroachment.

6.3.4 Absentee squatter-owners not operating business

Absentee squatter-owners not operating business will be entitled to salvage facilities and materials5.

6.4 Loss of livelihood

6.4.1 Workers employed by squatters and vulnerable encroachers

Workers employed by squatters and vulnerable encroachers will be entitled to continued employment as a condition of their employers' receiving livelihood assistance should any delay in the latters' resettlement exceed two months.

6.5 Loss of community/privately-owned utilities.

Squatter-owners of such facilities will be entitled to compensation at replacement cost and will be allowed to salvage materials without jeopardising that entitlement.

(i) The lease rate covers provision of kiosk only; (ii) Lessees will make their own arrangements for electricity provision where needed, and bear related costs directly; (iii) where clusters of 10 or more ki'osks are located in an urban area falling within the jurisdiction of a municipality, NHA will enter into an agreement with the concerned municipality for provision of water connection and sanitation services to these kiosks at prevailing municipal rates. Lessees will pay applicable charges directly to the municipality; (iv) at other locations, NHA will install a hand pump for provision of water - wherever there are two or more kiosks located together, without access to an existing water source within a distance of 50 meters. The lessees will be responsible for operation and maintsenance of this facility, as well as for maintaining sanitary conditions in the vicinity of their kiosks.

A list of such assets, identified during socio-economic survey is presented in Table 5.1.


N5 (Phase II) Resettlement Action Plan, November 2007 63


6.6 Loss of trees owned by tenant

PAPS are entitled to replacement cost of planting material and will be allowed to salvage trees and crops without jeopardising that entitlement. The value of the tree is bawd on the type of tree, its age, productivity/output and overall age considerd. For timber it is 1.5 years and for frits between 5-10 years.

6.7 Loss of Culturally Significant Structures/Buildings

It is NHA policy not to disturb structures or buildings of cultural significance. Besides, the project will ensure that all culturally significant structures/buildings are protected and rebuilt if impacted.




Continues I Table 6.1 Entitlement Matrix

Definition of PAP Definition of Entitlement Additional Facilities Actions Responsibility

I Loss of Privately Owned Land

Owner of land as verified by Cash compensation in accordance with the Provincial revenue staff (tehsildars) will cany Compensation based on fair market value of LAC8 updated revenue record current market value based on updated out a survey of current land prices based on the lost asset and other damage sustained by

revenue records following the acquisition updated revenue records and replacement costs the land owners, all as determined by the LAC 6 process laid out in the LM under non- based on recent transactions of similar lands, following the acquisition process laid out in the

emergency situations, keeping in view the registered for the preceding One year L A A ~ and taking into account the amount and land type, productivity, location, and record locations where the land is to be acquired particulars of the landowners claims to such of past transactions compensation

provided in the LAA respective departments department concerned

In addition to the market value of the land, the Compensation paid promptly, in accordance LAC owner of the land will be entitled to an with the LAA, and prior to takeover of land additional sum of 15% of the land value if the acquisition was compulsory

Transfer deed and title changed from the LAC andNHA original owner to NHA

I1 Loss of Private, Built-up Property 9

Owner of property based on Cash compensation on a replacement-cost - verified documents basis inclusive of shifting cost.

Replacement cost assessed in accordance with LAC the schedule of rates of the provincial Buildings and Roads Department, inclusive of currently applicable premium

Land Acquisition Act, 1894 7 Section 9(2) of the LAA requires '...all persons interested in the land to appear personally or by agent before the Collector ... to state the nature of their respective interests in the land and the amount and particulars of

their claims to compensation for such interests...'. 8 Land Acquisition Collector

This also includes compensation to squatters for residencies, built-up infrastructure and other assets located on the land to be acquired. The definition of entitlement would be "cash compensation on a replacement cost basis

5065019 - Contract Administration and Construction Supervision for Highway Rehabilitation Project -Pakistan


Resettlement lm~ac ts

... Continued

DeJinition of PAP DeJinition of Entitlement Additional Facilities Actions Responsibility

Compensation paid promptly, in accordance LAC with the LAA, and prior to takeover of land

Structure to be demolished once compensation NHA amount has been released

I11 Loss of Squatters' and Vulnerable ~ncroachers''' Commereirl Structures Within CoI 1

Squatter-owner operating Squatter-owners to be resettled within the New kiosks (8 x 8 ft or equivalent) will be NHA to keep provision in the construction NHA business ROW to re-establish their business in the constructed for elieible sauatter-owners. i.e.. contract budeet for the construction of new - , , -

vicinity of their original operating space whose structures cannot be moved out of the kiosks and to finalize their locations in CoI and re-established further back in the ROW consultation with PAPS

owners for a ten-year period, at Rs 400 per consultative process taking into account the

month1 I, without requiring any down payment willingness and capacity of squatters to Pay

contractors immediately following the signing contractor of the contract; thereafter NHA will not hand over the remaining construction site within this reach to the contractors until these kiosks have been constructed

that is sufficient to enable PAPS to reconstruct these assets to original levels, assessed in accordance with the schedule of rates of the provincial Buildings and Roads Department, inclusive of currently applicable premium; ii) compensation paid promptly and prior to take over of land and iii) structures to be demolished once compensation amount has been paid.

lo Encroachers are defined as 'vulnerable' if their annual income falls below the poverty line, currently set by recent studies at Rs 7,800 per capita (USD 135).

' l (i) The lease rate covers provision of kiosk only; (ii) Lessees will make their own arrangements for electricity provision where needed, and bear related costs directly; (iii) where clusters of 10 or more kiosks are located in an urban area falling within the jurisdiction of a municipality, NHA will enter into an agreement with the concerned municipality for provision of water connection and sanitation services to these kiosks at prevailing municipal rates. Lessees will pay applicable charges directly to the municipality; (iv) at other locations, NHA will install a hand pump for provision of water - wherever there are two or more kiosks located together, without access to an existing water source within a distance of 50 meters. The lessees will be responsible for operation and maintenance of this facility, as well as for maintaining sanitary conditions in the vicinity of their kiosks.




NHA to notify affected squatter-owners of NHA planned relocation at least two months prior to the date of shifting


NHA to ensure that eligible squatter-owners NHA are provided kiosks before they are shifted from their current location, and all affected squatter-owners are provided shifting assistance

material will be provided to all squatter-owners contract budget for assistance in shifting operating in the CoI 1

In exceptional circumstances where new kiosks NHA to forego lease payments to compensate NHA are not provided at the time of shifting, eligible for delays in resettlement squatter-owners will be exempted from lease payments for a period that is twice the disturbance period (i.e., the period from the date of shifting to the date of resettlement into the new kiosks)

months of shifting, eligible squatter-owners will monthly basis (NHA to keep provision in the be provided livelihood assistance at the rate of local component of project cost /RP budget) Rs 5,00Q/month until such time as the new kiosks are made available

Vulnerable encroacher-owner As for squatter-owners above, provided that As for squatter-owners above As for squatter-owners above. NIL4 will As for squatter- operating business the livelihood of the vulnerable encroacher- determine whether or not the encroacher's owners above

owner is adversely affected by the removal of the encroachment

livelihood is affected by the removal of encroachment in consultation with the vulnerable encroacher

Squatter-ten~nts nperz?i.n.g Squatter-tenants to be resettled within the New kiosks (8 x 8 ft or equivalent) will be NBA to keep provision in the construction NHA business ROW to re-establish their business in the constructed for eligible squatter-tenants, i.e., contract budget for the construction of new

vicinity of their original operating space whose structures cannot be moved out of the kiosks and to finalize their locations in CoI and re-established further back in the ROW consultation with PAPS

Continues ..




... Continued


Kiosks will be leased to eligible squatter- NHA to finalize lease rate based on a NHA tenants for a ten-year period, at Rs 400 per consultative process taking into account the

12 month , without requiring any down payment willingness and capacity of squatters to Pay

NHA to hand over sites for new kiosks to the NHA and contractors immediately following the signing contractor of the contract; thereafter NHA will not hand over the remaining construction site within this reach to the contractors until these kiosks have been constructed

NHA to notify affected squatter-tenants of NHA planned relocation at least two months prior to the date of shifting

NHA to ensure that eligible squatter-tenants are NHA provided kiosks before they are shifted from their current location, and all affected squatter- tenants are provided shifting assistance

.. ..... ........ Assistance in shifting belongings will be NHA to keep provision in the construction NHA provided to all squatter-tenants operating in the contract budget for assistance in shifting CoI 1

l2 (i) The lease rate covers provision of kiosk only; (ii) Lessees will make their own arrangements for electricity provision where needed, and bear related costs directly; (iii) where clusters of 10 or more kiosks are located in an urban area falling within the jurisdiction of a municipality, NHA will enter into an agreement with the concerned municipality for provision of water connection and sanitation services to these kiosks at prevailing municipal rates. Lessees will pay applicable charges directly to the municipality; (iv) at other locations, NHA will install a hand pump for provision of water - wherever there are two or more kiosks located together, without access to an existing water source within a distance of 50 meters. The lessees will be responsible for operation and maintenance of this facility, as well as for maintaining sanitary conditions in the vicinity of their kiosks.




are not provided at the time of shifting, eligible for delays in resettlement squatter-tenants will be exempted from lease payments for a period that is twice the disturbance period (i.e., the period from the date of shifting to the date of resettlement into the new kiosks)




.. . Continued


In case new kiosks are not provided within two Livelihood assistance to be paid by NHA on a NHA months of shifting, eligible squatter-tenants will monthly basis (NHA to keep provision in the be provided livelihood assistance at the rate of local component of project cost /RMF budget) Rs 5,00O/month until such time as the new kiosks are made available

Vulnerable encroacher-tenant As for squatter-tenants above, provided that As for squatter-tenants above operating business the livelihood of the vulnerable encroacher-

owner is adversely affected by the removal of the encroachment

As for squatter-tenants above. NHA will As for squatter- determine whether or not the encroacher's tenants above livelihood is affected by the removal of encroachment in consultation with the vulnerable encroacher

Absentee squatter-owner not Allowed to salvage facilities and materials operating business

NHA to notify affected absentee squatter- NHA owners of planned relocation directly or through a public notice at convenient locations at least two months prior to the date of shifting

IV Loss of Livelihood

Workers employed by squatters and vulnerable encroachers

The livelihood assistance to be provided to Livelihood assistance to be paid by NHA on a NHA eligible squatter-owners, vulnerable monthly basis (NHA to keep provision in the encroachers, and tenants (Rs 5,00O/month in local component of project cost/RP budget) case of delays in resettlement exceeding two months), will be conditional on their retaining the workers employed in their business

V Loss of Community/Privately-Owned Utilities "

Paid compensation at replacement value and .Allowed to salvage facilities NHA to notify affected squatter-owners of NHA current market prices planned relocation at least two months prior to

date of shifting

Assistance in shifting salvaged material to a NHA to keep provision in the construction NHA !oc.tion withir? 5 !m of the origind !ocztion contract budget for assistance in shifting

NHA to ensure that squatter-owners are NHA provided shifting assistance before they are shifted from their current location



- *$%g&\,< , .y l

2 Resettlement Impacts Resettlement Impacts

... Continued

Definition ofPAP Dejnition ofEntitlement Additional Facilities Actions Responsibility

VI Loss of Trees Owned by Squatters

Squatter-owner or tenant as Compensation paid at replacement cost(see Allowed to salvage treeslwood applicable 6.6 for details)

NHA to notify affected squatter- NHA ownersltenants of planned relocation at least two months prior to date of shifting

VII Loss of Culturally Significant Structures

Existing mosque committee NBA to cover cost of providing replacement or Imam structure.

Replacement cost assessed in accordance NHA with the latest schedule of rates; NHA to keep provision in the local component of project budget for replacing the structure

NHA to arrange space at the nearest appropriate NHA to keep provision in the local NHA location to re-establish the facility component of project budget for providing

space

Communitylcaretaker Shifting and re-locating of graves Assistance in shifting and relocating graves to NHA to keep provision in the contract budget NHA in responsible for graves the nearest appropriate location for assistance in shifting and relocation consultation with

stakeholders

aCommunity-owned utilities include hand pumps, boundary walls, and other fixed assets that can be salvaged.

506501 9 - Contract Administration and Construction Supervision for Highway Rehabilitation Project -Pakistan


,o*&:~~"i , % &ad +*: ,@& " "s&lEc Institutional Arrangement

7 INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS

The Project Entitlement Matrix (See Chapter 5) specifies the Institutional (Implementation) Arrangements for the preparation and implementation of Resettlement Action Plans for the HRP.

7.1 Institutional Arrangements for Implementation

The NHA's General Manager (GM) NHIP will have overall responsibility fo~r ensuring project compliance with the EMP and EM. He will be supported by a Diirector (D) Environment, IVHIP, in turn assisted by Deputy Director (DD) Environment/Social stationed at Regional Office, Peshawar for matters relating to environment, social and resettlement. In NWFP, the implementation of the project will be managed by a Project Coordiiilator (PC) stationed at Mansehra. The Project Coordinator will, in turn, be assisted by a team of Deputy Project Coordinator (DPC) assigned to N-3 5.

There will also be a Social Resettlement Committee operating in NWFP, consisting of PC, DPC and DD Environment/Social. This committee will be responsible for coordlinating the project's social implementation and monitoring issues and reporting to the GM, NHIP. The committee will be required to convene quarterly meetings, although may need to meet on a monthly basis in the initial stages of the project.

The PC/DPC and DD Environment/Social will supervise Land Acquisition Collector (LAC) and his lower staff in matters relating to land acquisition and management and will be responsible for implementing the EM. They will in turn be assisted by the field-based supervisors/inspectors in the concerned reach.

Specifically, the NHA's resettlement staff will ensure that the following activities are carried out transparently and according to acceptable standards.

Verifying PAPs on the basis of specified documents

Verifying public facilities and utilities need to be relocated, and whether in the case of water pumps, alternative sources of water are available

Carrying out a consultation and information dissemination campaign on cornpensation procedures, entitlement packages, and proposed alternative resettlement sites

Identifying any problems due to restricted access to the highway during constnuction, and verifying whether ramps/diversions have been provided where required

Establishing a grievance redressal committee to ensure fairness and transparency during the resettlement process

Preparing a joint on-site inventory and valuation of the effected assets and iincomes of individual PAPs

Preparing individual entitlement files

Preparing and approving compensation budgets

Ensuring an adequate notice period is given to PAPs before shifting

Ensuring and recording compensation payments in case of delays

Providing shifting assistance to displaced squatters and to squatter-owners allowed to salvage their facilities

5065019 - Contract Administration and Construction Supervision for Highway ~ahabilitatkA Project -Pakistan

N5(Phase II) Resettlement Action Plan, November 2007

Identifying major issues of conflict between PAPS and the NtWcontractors during implementation of resettlement activities.

7.2 Grievance Redressal Procedure

The Project Coordinator (PC) assigned to Earthquake Damaged Roads will maintain a Community Complaints-Management Register (CCMR) for that particular reach, to document complaints brought forward by the local community, and to ensure that these are appropriately redressed under the project's M&E system. The PC will report directly to the GM, NHIP. The information recorded in the register will include the date of the complaint and particulars of the complainant; a description of the grievance; the follow-up action required; the person responsible for implementing the action; and a target date for its completion.

A small grievance redressed committee will be constituted to deal the resettlement. and other issues. The Committee will be comprised 3 members, including DPC, a representa.tive of the Supervisory Consultant, a representative of the community/ PAP. The committee will resolve the grievances at local level and the PC will be informed in written by the DPC about the grievance and its resolution. However, for grievances, which could not be resolved by the Committee at local level, will be referred to the PC along with the findings of the Committee. The PC will resolve the grievance in consultation with the GM, NHIP.

Affected communities and their representatives will be identified during tlhe project preparation stage. The PCIDPC will visit each community once a month, while his office will maintain a record of these visits (date visited, persons met, issues discussed, and complaints brought forward) using the CCMR. The DPC will work towards resolving the grievances recorded in the CCMR in conjunction with the Supervision Consultant within seven days. After this deadline, any unresolved issues will be forwarded to the GM, NHIP. The Project Coordinator will, in turn, seek to resolve outstanding issues referred to him within seven calendar days. In all cases, the NHA7s response will be formally communica~ted to the complainant in writing.

The CCMR and feedback from the Consultants engaged for social monitoring will be periodically (at least quarterly) reviewed at a high-level meeting at the GM, NHIP, and the necessary actions taken to redress outstanding issues as soon as possible, with a formal NHA response communicated to the complainant in writing. Any observations made by Local NGOs and CBOs will also taken into consideration in redressal process.

7.3 Reporting

The overall progress reporting of land acquisition and resettlement activities will be the responsibility of the regional project Coordinators (PCs), who will prepare the quarterly progress report which will be submitted to the General Manager, NHIP and World Bank. The Supervisory Consultant will help in preparing the progress reports covering the implementation of resettlement activities under the project.

7.4 Training

NHA will organize a training program for all concerned staff both at office of the Project Coordinators (PCs) and field level, contractors, design consultants and other who will be involved in the land acquisition and resettlement activities. Thiere would be one-day training relating to the basic concepts and three days advance training, covering

5065019 - Contract Administration and Construction Supervision for Highway ~ehabilitatgz Project -Pakistan


environmental and social issues and their mitigations relating to the implementation of the project. In addition the implementation requirements with emphasis on soles and responsibilities of NHA, Consultants and Contractor staff while executing EMP will also be covered under the training program. The following major aspects will be covered under the training:

Principles and procedures of land acquisition. Aspects relating to land acquisition and compensation including property ownership, fair market price of land and crops, trees, and built-up property, and timely release of compensation amount; Public consultation and participation, methods, mechanism etc.; Eligibility, entitlements and compensation mechanisms; Grievance redress; Monitoring of resettlement operations Use of safety gadgets by the workforce. Safety hazards for workforce and local communities arising from coinstruction activities, blasting, road crossing, etc. Interruption of access of local people to natural resources and to places of socioeconomic activities. Integrity of privacy of local people particularly woman. Sanctity of religious and cultural properties. Traffic management aspects, including detouring plan, observation on agreed timeframe for closure of traffic, passing of vehicles at emergency, etc. Relocation of publiclprivate infrastructures including electricltelephone poles, water pipelines, mosques, graves, shrine, etc. Inclusive development to include gender, vulnerable groups disabled etc.

Proposed Training Plan for Implementation of Resettlement activities

Sr. No. -

1.

Type of Training

Orientation workshop - Involuntary Resettlement/ Social Impact, Consultations and Assessment

Principals, Procedures, Eligibility, Entitlement, Grievances Redressal

Implementation of Resettlement Activities with

Category of Participants

Stakeholders (NHA, NHIP, Revenue Department, NGOs, Contractor, Agricultural Department, Forestry Department, PAPS & other stakeholders).

Project Management/

1 Execution Agency

PCs, DPCs, Revenue staff, NHA concerned officials

No. of Participants Duration Venue Remarks

NHA Office, Islamabad

At Site Total

cost Rs.

Total estimated cost Rs.

NHA Office, Islamabad

5065019 - Contract Administration and Construction Supervision for Highway ~ehabilitatkA Project -Pakistan

Total estimated cost Rs. 100,000


1 Consultations

4. Inter Monitoring regarding Resettlement Activities L-

PCs, DPCs, Revenue staff, NHA concerned officials

5065019 - Contract Administration and Construction Supervision for Highway ~ehabilitatG4 Project -Pakistan

10


3 Total Office, estimated

100,000

LL

Figure 6.1 Organizational Chart for Social Management

J$c;2B>k s i ~ EC IVlonitoring and Evaluation %%<VJ#

8 MONITORING AND EVALUATION

8.1 Monitoring and Evaluation of Resettlement Activities

Monitoring & Evaluation are critical activities in involuntary resettlement. Monitoring involves periodic checking to ascertain whether activities are progressing as per schedule while evaluation is essentially a summing up, at the end of the project, assessment of the actual achievement in comparison to those aimed at during the implementation. RP implementation will be monitored both internally and externally.

Project Directorates (NHA) will be responsible for internal monitoring through their field level offices and will prepare monthly reports on the progress of RP implementation. This will be included as part of the QPR. NHA will provide necessary human resources to satisfy training needs. An independent consultant will be sourced by NHA to evaluate RP implementation. They will be restricted to just two such evaluations, one at project mid-term, the other at project completion.

8.1.1 Internal Monitoring

The RAP includes indicators and benchmarks for achievement of the objectives under the resettlement programme, which can be categorized as follows:

(a) Process indicators, which include project inputs, expenditures, staff deployments, etc.;

(b) Output indicators are results in terms of numbers of affected persons compensated and resettled, incomes restored, additional assistance provided.

(c) Impact indicators related to the long-term effect of the project on people's lives in the project- affected area.

The first two types of indicators, related to process and immediate outputs and results, will be monitored internally by field level project coordination offices. This information will1 be collated in the form of a monthly report. This will facilitate to assess the progress and results of W implementation, and adjust the work program, where necessary, in case of any delays or problems. The socio-economic census and land acquisition data provide the necessary benchmark for field level mo'nitoring.

Specific activities under RAP implementation that will be monitored are the following:

Information campaign and consultation with PAPs;

Status of land acquisition and payments on land compensation;

Compensation for affected structures and other assets;

Relocation of PAPs;

Payments for loss of income; and

Income restoration activities.

The following instruments will be used to gather the information used for monitoiring and evaluation purposes:

Review of census information for all PAPS;

Consultation and informal interviews with PAPs;

In-depth case studies;

Informal sample survey of PAPs;

5065019 - Contract Administration and Construction Supervision for Highway Rehabilitation Project - Pakistan 8- 1 N5(Phase I I ) Resettlement Action Plan, November 2007

Monitoring and Evaluation

Key informant interviews; and

Community public meetings.

8.1.2 External Monitoring

As mentioned earlier, an experienced agency will be engaged to cany out the evaluation of the RP implementation. Just two independent evaluations will be undertaken during the project duration. The first will be a mid-term evaluation; the second at project completion.

This agency will be selected in accordance with the official GOP process for the appointment of consultants. with advice and concurrence of the Bank on the experts selected. The agency's work will start approximately two years after the start of construction work following RAP approval. The agency will review the status of the Resettlement implementation in light of the targets, budget and duration that had been laid down in the Resettlement Plan. The key tasks during external monitoring include:

Review and verify internal monitoring reports prepared by NHA and their field offices;

Review of the socio-economic baseline census information of pre-displaced persons;

Identification and selection of impact indicators;

Impact assessment through formal and informal surveys with the affected persons;

Consultation with APs, officials, community leaders for preparing review report; and

Assess the resettlement efficiency, effectiveness, impact and sustainabili~y, drawing lessons for future resettlement policy formulation and planning.

The following will be considered as the basis for indicators in monitoring and evaluation of the project:

Socio-economic conditions of the PAPs in the post-resettlement period;

Communications and reactions from PAPs on entitlements, compensation, options, alternative developments and relocation timetables etc.;

Valuation of assets;

Grievance procedures;

Disbursement of compensation; and

Level of satisfaction of APs in the post resettlement period.

Internal monitoring activities and reporting will begin as soon as RAP implementation begins.

External monitors will be contracted out to an experienced agency. The agency will mobilize on just two occasions, at mid-term and at project completion.

8.2 Monitoring Roles and Responsibilities

The federal DirectorDD Social Infrastructure and Land Management will be responsible for: monitoring:

The progress of resettlement activities under the RAP, based on progress reports submitted by the regional DDs Operations.

5065019 - Contract Administration and Construction Supervision for Highway Rehabilitation Project - Pakistan 8-2 N5(Phase 11) Resettlement Action Plan, November 2007


The status of the project's consultation strategy, based on progress reports submitted by the regional DDs Operations.

At the end of Year 1 of project implementation, the NHA will review the: efficacy of the monitoring and evaluation arrangements for social, resettlement, and land management issues, and refine the arrangements accordingly.

8.3 Monitoring Parameters

Social monitoring will be carried out based on the following indicators under Phase 11:

Number of PAPs to be resettled/relocated/provided livelihood assistance where required

Availability and adequacy of alternative resettlement sites for PAPs (by number and type)

Inventory and valuation of PAPs' affected assets

Pre- and post-resettlement incomes of PAPs

Notice period given to PAPs before shifting them from their original locations within the ROW

Number of vulnerable PAPs compensated under the RAP

= Number of alternative kiosks/facilities to be provided within the ROW prior to shifting PAPs and handing the remaining section to the Contractor

Number of kiosks leased and rents at which leased

Record of lease payment sums

Proximity of alternative kiosksloperating spaces to original kiosksloperating spaces

Verification of shifting assistance provided to displaced squatters and to squatter-owners allowed to salvage their facilities

Lag between date of PAPs' vacation of their original structures and date of resettlement in their new kiosksloperating spaces

Number and nature of consultations carried out, as well as targeted stakeholtlers

PAPs' perspectives on compensation procedures and entitlement packages

Record of any problems due to restricted access to the highway during construction, and whether rampsldiversions have been provided where required

Number of grievances recorded and redressed

Key issues of conflict between PAPs and the NHA/contractors during implementation of resettlement activities.

Number of public facilities and utilities to be relocated

Number of mosqueslshrineslgraves relocated (if any) and correspondin~g contribution of affected communities and NHA

Verification of whether relocation of mosques/shri~neslgraves were relocated as per the provisions of the RAP

Removal of water pumps (if any), and verification of whether alternative source of water was made available

5065019 - Contract Administration and Construction Supervision for Highway Rehabilitation Project - Pakistan 8-3 N5(Phase II) Resettlement Action Plan, November 2007


8.4 Independent SociaVParticipatory Monitoring:

In addition to internal monitoring, the NHA will select independent monitoring agencies operating along various project reaches to verify the efficacy and ensure the transparency of the compensation and resettlement process carried out by IVHA. They will be engaged on the basis of clearly defined criteria including their experience and resources, to ensure the widespread monitoring of the project's compliance with the RAP. These agencies' terms of reference will define a clear work plan, including monitoring indicators, and reporting structures and timelines. The NHA will provide the necessary logistic support to facilitate them in the monitoring process. The organisation engaged for independent monitoring will report their findings on a quarterly basis directly to the regional GMs, regional Project Coordinators, federal GM Social and Lands and Resettlement and Social Committee.

8.5 Reporting

Monitoring & Evaluation are critical activities in involuntary resettlement. Monitoring involves periodic checking to ascertain whether activities are progressing as per schedule while evaluation is essentially a summing up, an assessment, at the end of the project, of the actual achievement in comparison to targets aimed at during implementation. RP implementation will be monitored both internally and externally.

Project Directorates @HA) will be responsible for internal monitoring through their field level offices and will prepare monthly reports on the progress of RAP impliementation. The results of systematic M and E must be a part of successive Quarterly Progress Reports (QPR). NHA will recruit the services of a private independent agency to provide ne:cessary training. An independent consultant will be sourced by NHA to evaluate RAP implementation. They will be restricted to just two such evaluations, one at project mid-term, the other at project completion.

5065019 - Contract Administration and Construction Supervision for Highway Rehabilitation Project - Pakistan 8-4 N5(Phase II) Resettlement Action Plan, November 2007

9 COSTS AND BUDGET

PAPs Profile

Funds for RAP implementation will be part of the Project budget. The annual investment plans for the Project will include resettlement and rehabilitation costs.

Costs are based on 2005. However, during implementation these rates may need to be updated in line with changing market values. The provincial NHA office will provide funds if needed.

9.1 Procedures for Flow of Funds

Funds for RAP implementation, including the payment of PAPs resettlement entitlements, are fi-om three sources. The principal tranche comes from the Bank and is part of the overall project cost. Lesser amounts have their origins in NHA and Government of Pakistan.

World Bank funds are transferred initially to the GoP Ministry of Finance from where they are subsequently transferred to NHA. Monies are held. in the GM office of NHIP.

Valuation of PAP'S assets, where the latter is liable to be adversely affected, will be undertaken by a team comprising DD/AD SILM at the regional level and the land acquisition collector and his staff. Officials from the office of the District Coordination Officer (DCO) will make public the comprehensive list of PAPs and of their respective entitlements. PAPs wishing to dispute their entitlements have seven days in which to submit a \mitten statement of to a grievance procedure to the Finance Division of their respective District Coordination Office.

Following consideration of these expressions of grievance a revised list of entitlements is made public and the DCO submits a request for funds to the GM office of IIHIP. PAPs still wishing to contend their entitlements have an additional seven days to lodge their claim.

The whole process will be monitored and reports submitted to the DirIDD SILM at HQ.

9.2 Inflation Adjustment

The rates of compensation and cash entitlements for rehabilitation and allowances payable to the affected persons will be adjusted annually on April 1, based on the actual annual inflation rate. The NHA together with various agencies will determine the annual inflation rate and ensure the necessary annual adjustments are made to compensation rates and to all cash entitlements.

9.3 Implementation, Administration and Contingency Costs

Implementation costs include costs already made for land demarcation andl surveys and for monitoring costs.

5065019 - Contract Administration and Construction Supervision for Highway Rehabilitation Project - Pakistan NS(Phase II) Resettlement Action Plan, November 2007 Page A4-1

PAPS Profile

Administration costs represent 1% of the total project costs.

The cost estimates for RP implementation also include provision for contingencies at 10% of total project costs.

The NHA is responsible for the provision of adequate funds to carry out the implementation of the RP.

Table 9.1: Summary of Assets to be affected under Phase 11 sections

Description Quantiq

Construction of new kiosks 20

Loss of livelihood (two months' delay) 20 business

Businesses (shifting assisstance) 458

Relocation of public and private utilities 2,692 "

Relocation of police posts/sheds/toilets 59 "

Replacement of mosques 5

Relocation of gravestshrines 10

9.4 Resettlement Plan Cost Estimation

Under Phase 11, 20 displaced vulnerable squatters and structures that cannot be moved any further back from their current location in the ROW will be provided wit11 new kiosks. A provisional sum of Rs 26,162,000 is allocated to cover the costs of relocatiqg public utilities, mosques and graves that could potentially be affected in the ROW. An amount of Rs 2,000,000 has been set aside for independent consultants to monitor the sociial aspects of the resettlement work. A further Rs 2,000,000 has been included in the budget to cover training costs. The estimated total resettlement budget for Phase I1 will therefore be Rs 30,120,000. Table 9.2 provides a breakdown of the proposed resettlement costs under Phase I1 of the project.

Table 9.2 Proposed Resettlement Budget for Phase I1

Description Quantify Total (fi '000)

Rate per Unit (hk)

Construction of new kiosks 20 kiosks 800 40,00O/kiosk inclusive of utility connections

Loss of livelihood (two months' 20 businesses 200 5,000tmonth (x2) delay)

Shifting assistance for businesses 458 businesses 458 Two trips @ 500/trip, i.e., 1,000ibusiness

" " " ..,. ---.

Contingency for resettlement - 500

Subtotal 1,958

Training 2,000 Lump sum

5065019 - Contract Administration and Construction Supervision for Highway Rehabilitation Project - Pakistan N5(Phase II) Resettlement Action Plan, November 2007 Page A4-2

&&g*q% -@*#SMEC + PAPS Profile

Provision for relocation of public 2,692 utility 17,746 Lump sum and private utilities items

Provision for relocation of - underground utilities

5,000 Lump sum

- -

Provision for relocation of police 59 structures 3 16 Lump sum postslsheds/toilets

. -. .................. -- - ..................... -- - -- ................. ............... -- - - - - -- ..... ...

Provision for replacement cost of 5 mosques 1,000 200,000lmosque mosques

.................

Provision for relocation of 10 graves 100 10,000 / grave gravedshrines

.. - Independent consultants for 2,000 Provisional sum social monitoring

Subtotal 28,162

Total 30,120

5065019 - Contract Administration and Construction Supervision for Highway Rehabilitation Project - Pakistan N5(Phase I I ) Resettlement Action Plan, November 2007 Page A4-3

&g8h~*slv EC 8%%2-(&

Implementation Schedule

10 IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE

10.1 Approval of the RP

The RP is prepared for NHA and is, therefore, an NHA document. Approval of the RP by the Bank is a necessary pre-condition for the disbursement of Bank loan support for the project. Once approved, the RP becomes legally enforceable.

10.2 Establishment of the Resettlement Committee

The NHA will establish a Social and Resettlement Committee consisting of regional staff, i.e. Director (Operations), DepIAsst. Director SILM and Project Coordinato~r, and HQ staff including Dir/Dep.Dir SILM.

The committee is tasked with the responsibility of coordinating all implementation and monitoring matters. They will report to the General Managers and Gieneral Manager, Environment/Social/Land Management at HQ. The Committee will meet quarterly but may need to meet monthly during the initial period.

10.3 Training of the Resettlement Committee

After the Resettlement Committee is established, its members will be briefed by NHA representatives regarding the RP and trained in implementation procedures.. Implementation according to OP 4.12 should, therefore, present no new obstacle. Any necessary training will be undertaken under contract by an experienced agency.

10.4 Establishment of Detailed Compensation Rates

The provincial office of NHA will determine the rates of compensation payable assets. Rates established will be at replacement cost without depreciation and without deduction for salvageable materials. Rates for structures will be calculated for affected area. Compensation rates will be adjusted for inflation at the time of compensation. Rates must be established before compensation entitlements can be calculated.

10.5 Conducting the Public Information Campaign

The project will develop a campaign to disseminate frequent information about the Project to the PAPs and the general public in the Project area. This campaign will begin as soon as the RP is approved.

10.6 Compensation and other Entitlement of PAPs

The DPCIPD and his team is responsible to ensure that all entitlements for asset and other losses are known to the PAPs along with their compensation amounts.


PAPS Profile

PAPs will be informed of their respective entitlements by posting this information at the local Nazim's office. In addition, the affected persons will receive a written doc~unent informing them of their entitlements.

10.7 Reorganisation on Existing Property and Clearance of the Project Axes

Relocation and/or restoration of squatters structures and clearance of project areas should be completed at least one month before Project engineering works commence.

10.8 Linkage between Resettlement Implementation and Construction Schedule

To ensure that all PAPs are properly reorganised before the start of project construction, all resettlement activities should be completed at least 1 month before the proposed date of actual commencement of physical works on the Project sites. The following activities have to be completed before the start of construction activities:

o Payment of all entitlements and delivery of allowances.

o Reorganisation of all affected persons.

o Necessary works associated with public service provision.


A,eT'"<2.+v? 8fk4f$

w;gv4sh%EC *,..-!?

Record of Public Consultation --

ANNEX 1: Record of Public Consnltationl Project Disclosure Campaign


&;;j*i: "MEC q*zv& PAPS Profile

Table A-1 Summary of Public Consultation Sessions

Section Date Venue No. of Participants

General Stakeholders' Workshops

Engineering General September 25,2001 Hyderabad (Sindh) Consultants (Pvt.) Ltd.

November 13,200 1 Lahore (Punjab) 118

Association of Road August 30,2000 Hyderabad (Sindh) Users of Pakistan

September 7,2000 Gujranwala (Punjab) 88

Scoping Sessions

MoreRanipur March 12, 2003 Kotri Kabir 12

March 20,2003 Hingorja and Khai Rahu 53 . -- - - - - - - - - -- - --- ---- -- - - - -- -

March 24,2003 Naushahro Firoz 22

March 26,2003 Halani and Nibro Bhatti 50

UbaureShaikh Wahan July 1,2003 Macchi Goth 21

July 2,2003 Kamoon Shaheed 25

July 3, 2003 Kot Sabzal 18

July 4,2003 Iqbalabad 22

Mian Channu-Sahiwal January 16,2003 Adda Dad Fatyana 3 1

January 18,2003 Adda Kassuwal bypass 90

January 18,2003 Basti Khanewal and Adda L- 14L Chak 28

January 20,2003 Chak 9-1 1 L Bambee 2 1

June 16,2003 Adda Dad Fatyana 3 1

June 17,2003 Railway Colony and Adda Kassowal 6 ... .....................

June 18,2003 Ahmedabad and Kassowal bypass 118

June 20,2003 Chak 9-1 1IL Bambee 21

November 5,2003 Kotla Adeeb Shahid stop and Hajjan Wali 14 stop

Sahiwal-kara December 23,2002 A1 Badar stop 10

December 23,2002 Yousaf Wala 26

December 23,2002 Gamber 10

Lahore-Gujranwala January 3 1,2003 Khori 5 1

January 3 1,2003 Sadhoki 27

January 3 1,2003 Chainwali 39 . ............

February 1,2003 Muridke 275

February 20,2003 Kamoki 3 5

5065019 - Contract Administration and Construction Supervision for Highway Rehabilitation Project - Pakistan N5(Phase I I ) Resettlement Action Plan, November 2007 Page A4-1

Section Date Venue No. of Participan,ts

Kharian-Rawalpindi December 2 1,2002 Bhai Khan 2 1

December 2 1,2002 New Behgam 25 " "

December 2 1,2002 Sohawa 25 " .... "

December 21,2002 Gungrila 12

Turn01 -Chablat March 29-30, 2002 Margalla Hills near Taxila, Jinnah and 61 Ahmednagar near Rawalpindi.

Roadside Consultations

Moro-Ranipur March 27,2003 Wassan and Jatoi 3

Ubauro-Shaikh Wahan July 1-3,2003 Fatehpur, Shakeelabad, Kot Sabzal, 11 Kamoon Shaheed and Macchi Goth

Mian Channu-Sahiwal January 16-18,2003 Different points along the section 7

January 20,2003 Sadiq Shaheed railway station 3

November 5,2003 Different points along the section 11

Sahiwal-Okara December 23,2002 Different points along the section 10

Lahorffiujranwala January 3 1,2003 Different locations along highway 10

Kharian-Rawalpindi December 21,2002 Different points along the section 14

Turn01 Xhablat March 30, 2002 Rawalpindi and Attock 6

Table A3-1 Stakeholder Consultations at Lahore - Gujranwala Section I I I

Venue Sr.

No.

No. of Participants kT Date

I April 14,2005 1 lmarnia Colony

2

3

4

5

8 1 April 15,2005 1 Ofice Motorway Police, Muridke

6

7

9 1 April 15,2005 1 Muridke City (G.T. Road) near Jinnah Ideal School

April 14,2005

April 14,2005

April 14,2005

April 15, 2005


Rachna Town

Habib Bank Limited, Muridke

Mujahid Hotel, Muridke 18

Ittehad Chemical Limited (Abadi New Hakeempura), G.T. 26 Road

April 15,2005

April 15,2005

Ravi Rayon, G.T. Road

Monoo abad (Dhakkum Pura), G.T. Road

24

28

5

8

Record of Public Consultation

I April 18,2005 Rana Town, G.T. Road

1 12 1 April 18,2005

11

Narowal Chowk, G.T. Road, Muridke

April 19,2005

April 19,2005

April 19,2005

April 18,2005

Sadhoke (Kamoke Side)

Rana Town Petrol Pump, G.T. Road

1 16 1 April 20,2005

Sadhoke (Lahore Side)

Qaisar Park and Timber Market, G.T. Road

Dera Ahmad Shah and Salar Munhasi

Mian CNG Petrol Pump, Kamoke April 20, 2005 k--J---

27

15

8

8

1 20 / April 21,2005

18

19

Kamoke City

Manners School (NB-Side) Muridke

April 20,2005

April 21,2005

1 22 1 April 21,2005 Govt. Degree College for Women, Kamoke

Mandi, Kamoke

Office of the NH & MP Kamoke (Eminabad)

1 23 1 April 22,2005

7

Arnenabad

1 24 I April 22,2005 Allama Iqbal Memorial Hospital

1 26 1 April 23,2005

25

Durgahi Gill Jaded, Rana Town

1 27 I April 23,2005

April 22,2005

Kacha Kotha Stop

Chand-da-Killa

1 28 1 April 23,2005 Sham ke Goan The. Ferozwala

1 29 April 23,2005 Sheikhanwala Pump Muridke

1 30 1 April 23,2005 Khori

Table A3-2 Statistics of Repeat Stakeholder Consultations at Turn01 - Chablat Section

No. of Participants Date Venue

Male Female

December 16,2004 Office of Deputy Director Maintenance, NHA Rawalpindi

December 16,2004

December 17,2004

Office of the DSP of NH&MP at Taxila

Nawababad


,&??;<@& %y2v4 S&I EC PAPs Profile

A3-3 Workshops Organized by EIA Consultants

The EIA consultants organized two regional stakeholders' meetings in the initial stages of the PHRP: one in Hyderabad for Sindh-based stakeholders, and another in Lalhore for Punjab- based stakeholders. The participants included government and NGO representatives, environmental field specialists, engineers, road contractors, highway users, and a cross- section of project-affected persons (PAPs), such as roadside vendors and shopkeepers, squatters, and petrol pump dealers. The meetings were publicized with the help of the district administration, union councils, personal contacts, and broadcast media.

At both workshops, participants were made aware of the purpose of the workshop, the scope of highway improvement works, and probable impact of construction activities and subsequent operation of the highway with reference to PAPs. A group of field specialists explained the technical and environmental aspects of th~e project in more detail. Finally, participants were distributed into groups to formulate and record their concerns. Each group's concerns were discussed with all the participants in general, followed by a question-answer session.

A3-4 Sindh Stakeholders' Workshop

The main concerns raised and suggestions documented at this workshop are listed below.

Highway Design

Eliminate dangerous curves and unnecessary unauthorized U-turns.

Ensure that side road intersections are properly laid.

Construct fencing on both sides of the highway to prevent accidents.

Construct more bypasses, pedestrian crossings near educational institutions, and bus stops to minimize accident risks.

Improve the general drainage system for rain/flood and sewage water.

Plan roadside tree plantations to counter the impact on natural vegetation.

Highway Construction

Avoid hiring outside labour that is likely to restrict local women's mobility and create social unease.

Compensate landowners for acquired land according to market rates.

Prevent soil erosion along the road berms and shoulders.

Highway Operation

Introduce new legislation to control fuel quality, vehicular emissions, and traffic flows and to protect neighbouring wildlife habitats.

Encourage better training of highway users in proper traffic sense and rules.

Introduce weighbridges to prevent excessive load on roads.

Strictly enforce speed control.

Introduce additional safety measures, including more cautionary signs.


~ Q B ~ : s M E c Record of Public Consultation . "

Encourage grove plantings at petrol pump sites and restaurants by their respective owners.

Provide drinking water arrangements at every bus stop.

A3-5 Punjab Stakeholders' Workshop

The main concerns raised and suggestions recorded at this workshop are listed below.

Highway Design

Formulate a well-defined policy on axle limits and pavement design.

Eliminate dangerous curves and unnecessary unauthorized U-turns.

Construct a median barrier.

Construct overhead crossings for pedestrians.

Plan roadside tree plantation extending into the ROW to counter the impact on natural vegetation.


Reaffirm whether the present land use plan is compatible with the EIA.

Ensure that Pak-EPA regulations regarding pollution and industrial water disposal are enforced.

Consult existing occupants or building owners when preparing a resettlement plan.

= Disburse compensation fairly among PAPS.

Ensure that road construction material on dump trucks or stockpile areas, is not left uncovered or allowed to cause dust pollution.

Highway Operation

Introduce fresh safety measures, including more cautionary signage and detours.

Strictly enforce speed control and restrict the use of vehicle horns.

Ensure that cross-drainage structures are maintained to avoid choking with debris.

A3-6 Workshops Organized by ARUP

ARUP organized a series of regional stakeholders' meetings to assess baseline performance indicators in Pakistan's road sector during the year 2000, seek initial inputs on the proposed design of the PHRP, and to draft terms of reference for the project's environmental and social assessmeint studies. These workshops were held in Hyderabad for Sindh-based stakeholders and in Gujranwala for Punjab-based stakeholders.

The concerns raised by the participants are listed below.

General dissatisfaction with travel time and lack of adequate cautionary/information signage and markings.

Restricted mobility, particularly for women, caused by lack of rural roads and inadequate public transport.

Delays in implementing road construction/rehabilitation projects.


PAPS Profile

Lack of rest areas and toilet facilities along the highway.

High accident risk to highway users and unacceptable delays in treating accident victims.

= Exposure of surrounding population to excessive emissions and noise generated by vehicles and construction equipment.

Inadequate vigilance in identifying and addressing adverse project effects ain people's health, safety, and access.

No feedback mechanism to encourage effective beneficiary participation.

Loss of agricultural land and natural habitats.

Inadequate and delayed compensation payments.

Delayed compensation for loss of livelihood.

Socio-economic impact of migrant construction labour.

Risk to places of cultural value.

A3-7 Scoping Sessions

A series of scoping sessions and focus group discussions was carried out with local communities and local government representatives. The meetings were held at various sites along the Phase I1 sections (Table 6.1).

Generally, people were found to be aware of the need to upgrade the highway, and indicated their support for the NHA. The proposed improvement of the additional carriageway met with particular support since it will reduce traffic congestion and other road hazards near settlements along the project corridor. Local communities demanded that they be part of a continuous consultation process with other stakeholders at different stages of the project including the design, construction, and operation periods.

The most commonly raised concerns are listed below:

Highway Design

Improve general standards of construction.

Facilitate pedestrian and animal crossing by avoiding sn difference in level between the ACW, ECW, and median.

Help abate dust emissions by concreting road shoulders.

Avoid constructing sharp road curves.

Construct service lanes and U-turns where required, and bypasses near settlements.

Erect pedestrian overhead bridges, particularly near schools, hospitals, aind critical points, along with a fence or partition wall in between carriageways.

Provide drain outlets to help drain away runoff from the highway, particularly in areas where road level is higher than that of surrounding settlements.

Provide footpaths and lanes for slow-moving traffic, particularly cyclists.

Build bus bays, passenger shelters, and parking areas, particularly for rickshaws.

Provide rest areas and toilet facilities along the highway.

Plant trees along. the hig.hwav that could be entrusted to the care of local communities.


~"&[email protected];MEC Y@!f& Record of Public Consultation

Avoid shifting graves that may fall within the ROW

Avoid relocating~dismantling mosques and other permanent structures

Properly compensate owners of demolished structures.


Avoid undue delays in road construction and ensure that project works are carried out in one stretch rather than piecemeal.

Ensure that contractors do not use private land for parking construction maclhinery.

Avoid dumping construction material along the highway and median.

Adopt measures to minimize dust, smoke, and noise pollution, and to control spillages from construction machinery.

Provide proper diversions for traffic during construction to avoid traffic congestion, related hazards, and dust emissions.

Highway Operation

Provide medical aid centres along the highway to treat road accident emergencies.

Erect cautionary and information signs.

Control over-speeding, overloading, traffic disorders and violations of traffic regulations; construct speed breakers where required.

Prohibit commercial vendors and squatters from encroaching on the ROW.

Make traffic police accountable for the duties they are expected to carry out

Involve the National Highway and Motonvay Police (NHMP) by stationing police officers at various points along the highway

Increase tree plantation along the highway

Ensure that cross-drainage pipes and culverts are regularly cleaned

Regularly remove accumulated piles of rubbish from the ROW.

Land Acquisition and Resettlement-Related Concerns

Squatters should be resettled before construction works begin. Most squatters are willing to move from their present locations provided alternative land is made available nearby within the ROW on which to erect their structures

Bus stops should be shifted to the new relocation site

In addition to compensation for the structures removed, additional financial assistance is required to erect structures at new locations.

Compensation should be fair, paid promptly, and subject to transparency. PAPS have complained of not receiving compensation even after the ACW had been constructed.

The acquisition of further land should be avoided. Where necessary, acquisition should be carried out in accordance with the law. The acquired land should be possessed only once the compensation payment is made.

Public consultation should be an integral part of the land acquisition process.


$&$& ,@&SMEC PAPS Profile

A3-8 Roadside Consultations

Roadside consultations were carried out mainly with pedestrians, vehicle drivers, public transport passengers, roadside vendors and shopkeepers, local inhabitants, government officials and IVGO representatives at various locations (see Table 6.1). Most of the concerns raised were similar to those discussed during the scoping sessions describefd in Section 6.3. Additional issues brought up in these polls are listed below:

Highway Design

Contractors hired from outside are unfamiliar with local conditions and cannot tailor their work to local requirements.

Rains have damaged the existing road shoulders, making overtaking very dangerous.

Protective walls are needed on both sides of the road.


The presence of migrant labour restricts the movement of local women working in nearby fields.

Oil spills from overturned oil tankers destroy standing crops in adjoining agricultural fields and damage land.

Highway Operation

The lack of trafic law enforcement encourages careless driving.

Careless tractor drivers moving onto the highway are a hazard to fast moving vehicles.

Bus drivers do not refrain from blowing their horns even near sensitive locations, such as schools or hospitals.

Carts and vehicles occasionally park under the shade of roadside trees, obstructing traffic en route and causing accidents.

Trolleys overloaded with sugarcane and cotton harvests tend to occupy the entire width of the road, which often causes accidents.

There are no streetlights to facilitate night driving through towns/settlements, raising the risk of accidents.

Pedestrians tend to lack road sense.

Ploughs fitted on tractors cause deep trenching on the road surface when crossing the highway.

There are not enough first aid or medical centres near the ROW and road accident victims often remain untended for hours.

The highway provides a safe escape route to dacoits who frequently operate in the villages.

A3-9 Resettlement Issues

In analysing various resettlement options, a study was carried out among the PAPs settled in Dina and Gujar Khan in Punjab. Twenty people were interviewed in Gujar Khan and eight in Dina. The feedback received is described below:


""J;~&%L;P"\sM EC %$@ @& Record of Public Consultation

A3-9-1Gujar Khan

People here are generally dissatisfied with the resettlement plan provided by NHA. They consider the cost being charged for new roadside structures (Rs 30,000) to be: far too high and disproportionate to their incomes. A down payment of Rs 5,000 is required and the remaining cost is to be recovered in monthly instalments of Rs 1,000, in addition to a monthly Rs 1,000 rent. The structures provided are currently incomplete, eg, they lack partiti011 walls and other amenities, such as electricity. This problem has been compounded by the fact that the monthly income of affected vendors has fallen as a result of a change of location and the existence of an open drain in front of their new kiosks.

At the same time, people have indicated their appreciation of this arrangement in spite of its accompanying problems. Previously the police and local administration freqiaently demanded they shift their kiosks elsewhere or extracted bribes for allowing them to sta~y. This practice has now ceased, although the people here have been warned that they ]may have to be relocated when the need arises.

A3-9-2 Dina

Although some 104 PAPs have already been resettled in Gujar Khan, only 141 out of a total of over 200 have so far been resettled in Dina. The resettlement model for Dina differs from that for Gujar Khan in that PAPs have been allocated an area without providing them with new structures. They have erected steel structures of their own in accordance with the design provided by the National Logistics Cell (hTLC). These structures have cost th.em Rs 10,000 to 12,000 each. Procuring these structures has caused them financial hardship, given that this arrangement did not come into effect until a year after they moved during which time they had no source of income. People also expressed the following reservations:

Most PAPs were thriving commercially at their original locations at the intersection of Mangla Road and the N5. Having now been relocated, their businesses have suffered drastically. They believe that sufficient space is available at the old location and they would prefer to move back to their original location.

Customers normally consider mobile vendors to sell goods at cheaper rates than established shopkeepers. Now that PAPs have moved to proper shops, their business volume has gone down as a result of increased competition.

A common complaint is that steel structures with steel roofs were uncomfortable during summer as well as winter. Most people preferred the idea of a fibreglass roof similar to those provided in Gujar Khan. For this, they will need financial assistance from the NHA, as fibreglass roofs are more expensive.

A representative of the displaced persons stressed that although sufficient area had been officially allocated for the resettlement of about 100 PAPs, the resettlement was proceeding very slowly.

The reservations put forward by the PAPs surveyed in Gujar Khan and Dina have been incorporated as far as possible into the resettlement policy framework discussed in Section 3.3.

A3-10 Address of Stakeholders' Concerns

The concerns raised by stakeholders have been incorporated into the project's environmental and social assessment as described below.

5065019 - Contract Administration and Construction Supervision for Highway Rehabilitation Project - Pakistan N5(Phase II) Resettlement Action Plan, November 2007 Page A4-I 0

&i%%+ -Y ,." t SM EG PAPS Profile %%;*pr&k A

Highway Design

In response to stakeholders7 concerns, the RMP design for five stretches along the Lahore-Gujranwala section has been revised to minimize the relocation of squatters. The RMP design for the Moro-Ranipur section lhas been altered to avoid relocating four graveyards. In addition, the contractors and supervision consulltants will include the following environmental and safety provisions in the project design under Phase 11:

Highway safety audits and improved road markingslsignage and demarcation of accident- prone junctions in order to improve the horizontal and vertical geometry, and reduce conflicting movement during operation, particularly along inhabited stretches of road.

Improved intersections on side roads and village tracks in order to eliminate bottlenecks.

Roadside furniture and traffic control devices, including information and cautionary signs, signals, traffic diversion and flow markings, to ensure pedestrian safety during construction and operation.

Public facilities, including bus bays with passenger waiting sheds and latrines, service lanes, footpaths, pedestrian-crossing facilities, and fences.

A tree plantation program to compensate for the anticipated loss of vegetation during construction activities, and to help abate pollution caused by emissions, dust, and noise during highway operation.

Outfalls for the highway median and side drains to divert surface run-off from the carriageway, and protect ribbon development areas and settlements.


The following measures will be carried out in order to protect surrounding communities from the expected impact of construction:

Project facilities will be located at a minimum distance of 500 m from existing settlements and built-up areas in order to avoid restricting the mobility of local women.

Construction vehicles will remain confined within their designated areas of movement.

Sensitivity towards local customs and traditions will be encouraged to] minimize social friction; good relations with local communities will be promoted by encouraging contractors to provide opportunities for skilled and unskilled employment to locals, as well as on-the-job training in construction for young people.

Soil erosion will be minimized by protecting low embankments by planting indigenous grasses, and high embankments by constructing stone pitching or a riprap across the embankment.

The NHA is bound to comply with Pak-EPA regulations concerning pollution and industrial water disposal.

The resettlement policy framework for the project incorporates stakeholder consultation as part of the resettlement plan.

The loss of privately owned land or built-up property will be compensated on a replacement- cost basis.

Contractors will be required to ensure that construction work does not hinder local people's access to the highway and their ability to cross it safely. Constructing temporary ramps and diversion routes will facilitate pedestrians and livestock when crossing the highway.


a j ; i i t & ~ ~ ~ ~ %vyb~ ~4 4.

Record of F'ublic Consultation

Solid waste generated during construction and at campsites will be properly treated and safely disposed of only in demarcated waste disposal sites approved by the supe~i,sion consultant.

Contractors will be required to instruct and train their workforce in the storalge and handling of materials and chemicals that can potentially cause soil contamination.

Contractors will raise the level of boundary walls or construct new walls for buildings surrounding sensitive receptors such as schools and hospitals, to reduce tlhe impact of noise generated during construction and operation.

All necessary measures will be taken to ensure the safety of traffic during construction, including barricades (including signs, pavement markings, flags, and lights) erected as required by the NHA/NKMP. All such barricades will lbe set up as per local regulations.

Highway Operation

The NHA will work closely with the newly established NHMP to ensure that drivers as well as pedestrians observe traffic rules and that the safety of the pedestrians is n~ot compromised.

Traffic management plans will be prepared and implemented in conjunction with the NHMP and roadside commuters to reduce congestion and traffic hazards.

The NHA in conjunction with the NHMP will initiate a road safety avmreness campaign among roadside communities settled along project reaches.

A3-11 Concerns of People at Lahore-Gujranwala & Turnol-Chablat Sections

Notwithstanding some specific issues, most of the concerns raised were similar to those, which were already discussed and addressed in EIA Report of Rehabilitation and Maintenance for Phase-I1 sections.

The people were very particular about the safety and security of the road users. In this respect they emphasized the followings:

Roads have become very difficult to cross due to fast moving traffic. 'This will become even more difficult when the road is widened. Therefore, the people have generally demanded for the provision of pedestrian underpasses or overhead bridges to (ensure the safety of the people crossing the road. Preference was however given for the underpasses for the ease of women, school going children and old people.

Speed limit of 70 km per hour should be strictly observed in the ribbon development areas. It should be even less where zebra-crossings are provided so that the old people who cannot ride the stairs may use the surface crossings.

As this section passes through many urban centres and numerous well developed ribbon-development-areas, the local people in general face grave difficulty in approaching the highway during the night-time. They are prone to be hit by the fast moving traffic. Therefore, they have invariably demanded for the provision of light- posts in urbadsettlement areas along both sides of the highway.

The people are aware that in settlement areas the interaction of local traffic and highway-through-traffic cause congestions, accidents and even fatalities. Therefore, they have demanded proper arrangements for segregating both types of the traffics by providing service roads in the settlement areas.


N&;*SMEC a2a-fv]g PAPS Profile

The people and officials of the Highway Police have demanded that for the safety of the road users the U-turns present in the settlement areas may be closed and shifted to appropriate places at both ends of settlements. In this regard ever1 the question of provision of vehicular underpasses was also raised at many places, particularly where local traffic crossings are frequent.

Similarly for open areas it was suggested that the unauthorized and improper U-turns may be closed. U-turns may be provided at appropriate places only. If the existing U- turns are retained these should be properly designed to make them safe.

Provide side walks/footpaths along the highway for the use of pedestrians.

National Highway Police has particularly expressed their concern regarding the safety of the people and traffic hazards arising due to various reasons. These particularly include the following:

Proper stand for rickshaw stand at Muridke as at the present 1ocal:ions these cause nuisance and create traffic hazards. Similar demand was made by the people of Kamoke.

Check should be imposed on the vendors and others for control of encroachment of the highway to avoid hazards.

Encroachments on both sides of the road should be cleared by the NIHA, which cause the traffic hazards.

People have also shown great concern about other public facilities, such as provision of proper bus stopslbays along with waiting sheds and toilets in the cloise vicinity of the settlements. Even at places the people have suggested the location for the bus bays.

The people have demanded that crossing facilities like pedestrian underpasses and overhead bridges should construct prior to start of the road construction activities to provide the safe crossing to the community.

The community especially women has demanded Proper lighting system

Although most of the cattle crossings are carried out through the existing bridges, however, at places the people have shown concern for the cattle crossing through surface. They wanted underpasses for their livestock.

For crossing of reptile species openings should be provided in the New Jersey Barrier especially at pond areas.

For crossing of wildlife provisions should be made in the detailed desigin.

The road-side vendors and representatives of local government at Muridke have particularly shown their concern about the high charging rates for the cabins installed by NHA through a contractor. For this reason most of these are not only lying vacant but has also blocked the


space that was previously available for the vendors to run their business. The people demanded that these should be removed.

The project-affected persons were reluctant to shift at new place, however, they agreed to shift at location where public facilities like underpasses, bus bays, waiting sheds will be provided.

The people have generally demanded for the provision of proper drainage system along the highway to eliminate the problems faced by them from the runoff from the highway.

The vendors at Muridke, Kamoke and other places have shown their concern for their resettlement when they disrupted by the widening of the road. They have generally demanded that they should be resettled within NHA7s ROW but close to the existing place of their business.

The school faculties have shown concern about noise pollution.

General public in the vicinity of platform mosques have demanded that NHH should provide space for the mosques within ROW and construct a similar type platform mosque.


Annex 2: List of Project PAPS

NHlP revised RAP-N5 (Phase II) ANNEX 2


L - - 009'1 000'2 - - - 9 x 9 A usgy o m e l u!essnH PeUJUJWnN 00 1+EEE ' 19 1

ID Chainage Name of Respondents Father's Name

164. 393+500 Qurban Ali Diam Khan pC0 - Tenant - 1 - S 8 x 1 0 8 1 1 2.000 3.ooo - - - - - 10

165. 393+595 Muhammad Bashir Muhammad khan Cold drinks - Tenant - 1 - K - 2 9 1 0 3 . 0 0 0 1 . 5 0 0 - - - - - 10

166. 399+088 Gida Hussain Jan Muhammad Cobbler - Tenant - 1 - V - = = - - 200 1.500 - - - - 9

Muhammad lsmaeel Cobbler Tenant 1 V 6 x 8 - - - 1 000 1 500 - 8

168. 399+100 Abdul Raheem Abdul Karim TS 1 0 x 1 0

169. 399+105 Pevas Ali Muhammad Mithal Cold drinks - Tenant - 1 - K - 2 9 1 0 5 . 0 0 0 2 . 0 0 0 - - - - - 9

170. 399+107 Ulfat Ghulam Qadir Cold drinks Tenant 1 K 6 x 6 9 9 10 4,000 2,000 - - 11

171. 399+115 Zahid Hussain Muhammad Masoof Fruit Seller Owner 1 V 8 x 8 - - - 5,000 3,000 - - 6

172. 399+125 Qamai Din Umar Din Fruit seller Owner 1 V 8 x 6 - - - 1,000 3,000 - - 9

173. 399+130 Muhammad Badal Muhammad Koval Cold drinks Owner 1 K 6 x 6 9 9 10 5,000 3,000 - - 8

174. 399+198 Zaheer Abbas Muhammad Yaqoob Vegetable Seller Owner 1 V 10x10 - - 600 3,000 - 9

Continues.. .


... Continued

2


Abdul Karim Cold drinks Owner 1 K 6 x 6 6 9 10 10,000 2,200

178. 402+200 Fazal M Jalal u Din Hotel Owner I TS 6 1 25 15,000 2,000 - - - - - 8 - -

Roof (Codes) Walls (Codes) Floor (Codes)

1. RCC

2. RBC

3. Tiled - T-Iron, Girders

1 . Mud

2. Brick Masonry - Katcha Bricks

3. Brick Masonry - Pacca Bricks & Mud

1. Mud

2. Brick Floor - Bricks only

3. Brick Floor - with Cement Pointing

4. Tiled -Wooden Ribs 4. Brick Masonry - Pacca Bricks & Cement 4. Brick Floor - with Plastering

5. Tiled - Wooden Planks 5. Wall Plastering - Mud 5. Stone

6. Asbestosllron Sheets 6. Wall Plastering - Cement 6. Concrete

7. Thatched 7.Wall Plastering - Cement Pointing 7. Concrete - Plastering

8. Katcha Pacca 8. Katcha Pacca 8. Concrete - Mosaic

9. Other Specify: (woodliron sheefftarpal) 9.Other Specify: (woodliron sheet) 9. Katcha Pacca

10. Other Specify: (woodliron sheet)

(Figure 1 :

NHlP revised RAP-N5 (Phase 11) ANNEX 2

Exhibit A.2: Potential Project-Affected Persons on Ubauro-Sheikh Wahan Sectioil


-, .s 'C

m r 2 k . 3 !2 $ X ? a, s a, 'C - c - .s :e E q O h - V) V) 32 y y , h ALL 0 z 5 2 % s G - c v ) V) 3 0 - m a - X

a, 2 0 - 2 26. p b 2 -*g zg g g g 0 a, " $ 2 ", 0 2 2 y

a, c E '=2 .k! Lu 6 52 0 s B Q v, s E

Lu 9 201. 604+000 Ashfaq Ahmad Gul Muhammad PC0 Owner 1 K 4 x 6 5 9 9 8,000 3,000 - - 10

202. 604+400 Muhammad Arif Puthan Khan Veaetable Seller Tenant 2 8x8 - - - - - - 10

203. 604+405 Lutaf Ali Muhammad Kabool PCO - Owner - 1 - K 6x6 2 3 3 10.000 2.000 - - - - - 9

204. 604+595 Sultan Ahmad Chand Sweets Owner 1 V 4 x 6 z - -3,0001.500 - - 8

205. 604+600 Abdul Hamid Jewan Tea Stall Tenant 1 TS 6 x 5 7 9 1 8,000 2,000 2 3,000 11

207. 604+630 Aziz Ullah Ghula Muhammad Sweets Seller Tenant 1 K 8 x 8 9 9 9 5,000 2,500 - - 7

208. 604+635 Rasool Bukush Muhammad Piara Barbar Owner 3 K 8 x 8 7 9 1 8,000 2,500 1 600 8

209. 604+640 Haii Abdul Latif Merab Faaeer Fruit Seller - Owner - 1 - V - = = - 1 , 0 0 0 ~ - - - - - - 6

210. 604+640 Zulifiqar Ali Muhammad Asif Ice Seller Owner 2 V 7 x 8 - 700 4,000 - - 6

212. 604+645 Muhammad Younis Wali Muhammad Naswar Seller - Owner - 1 - K m 2 3 l 5 , 0 0 0 1 . 0 0 0 - - - - - 6

213. 604+655 Makhna Ataa Muhammad Cobbler - Owner - 2 1 5x5 - 400 1,200 - - - - - - 7- - - - 214. 604+660 Shah N w a z I ea staii Owner i I S i 2 x i 2 7 9 1 5,000 2,500 1 800 10

Continues.. .



216. 604+680 Allah Dino Muhammad Alam Tea stall - Tenant - 2 TS 1 0 x 1 0 5 2 1 5,000 4.500 - 2 3 , 0 0 0 8

217. 604+690 Asghar Ali Sumar Tailor Tenant 1 S 5 x 5 3 3 2 15,000 2,500 - - 7

218. 604+700 Ali Anwar Behram Tea stall - Tenant - 1 TS 8x8 - 1 4 , 0 0 0 3 , 0 0 0 - l l , o o o ~

219. 604+770 Muhammad lrshad Abdul Gaffoor General Store Owner 1 K 8 x 8 6 9 9 10,000 2,500 - - 9

220. 61 1 +000 Muhammad Rafiq Muhammad Sadeeq Fruit Seller Owner 1 y 1 0 x 1 0 - - - - - - 15

221. 61 1 +010 Muhammad Aftab Rahim Bukush P C 0 Owner 1 K 6 x 6 9 9 10 6,500 3,000 1 1,500 10

222. 61 1 +200 Abdul Maieed Karam Elahi Nashta - Owner - 1 1,500 2.500 - - 0

223. 61 1 +395 Manzoor Ahmad Behram Fruit Seller Owner 1 V 3 x 4 - - = 1,5CO 2,COO - - 0

227. 61 1 +400 Ghulab Di

230. 61 1 +430 Shahbir Ahmad Kamer Din Fruit Seller Owner 2 Y 3x5 = 1.200 2.000 - - - - - 8

Continues.. .



231. 611+450 Tulsha Cobbler Owner 1 - V * = - - - 400 1,500 - - - - - 11

232. 630+000 Muhammad Ramzan Nabi Bukush Veaetable Seller Owner 3 1 6x6 - - - 800 3,000 - - 15

233. 630+000 Muneer Ahmad Muhammad Alam Ice Seller - Owner - 1 - V W = = - 800 3,000 - - - - - 8 ....................................................................................................................................................... "

234. 630+000 Tariq Mehmood Ghulam Rasool Ice Seller - Owner - 1 ! ! 5 x 6 = - -1.ooo - 400 - - - - - 8 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

236. 641+700 Muhammad lmran Muhammad Aslam PCO - Owner - 1 - K 8x6 6 2 9 10,000 3,000 - - - - - 9

237. 641+700 Hafiz Muhammad Rafiq Ghulam Rafiq PC0 Owner 1 K 8 x 8 6 9 9 8,000 3,000 - - 9

238. 653+300 Nazir Ahmad Abdul ul Aziz Soup Seller Owner 2 TS 12x12 7 9 1 1,000 2,500 - - 7

239. 653+650 Shah Nawaz Mukhtar Ahmac! Barber Owner 1 I / 5 x 5 - - - 400 3,000 - - 9

240. 653+660 Ali Bukush Dur Muhammad Soup Seller - Owner - 1 - TS - 8 x 8 - 7 - 9 1 - 800 3.500 - - 8

. Continues..


0 r

I

I

0 0 m 0

0 0 LD. d

I

I

d X d

>

t C 3 0

L a, - - a, V) C a, Y 0 .- L 0

a, 3 U c= m K u 2 5 c

r'

E a, - m (I)

u i 5 L s 0 0 0 + C3 w w

cd d N

0 r

I

I

0 0 0- d

0 0 LD_ r

I

I

I

d X d

>

7

t f 0

t - - a, (I) - m

r" L m 2 a u 2 5 c

r'

L m 2 Q 0 c m c (I)

0 In 03 + w w w

6 d N

0 7

I

I

0 0 m C3

0 0 9 7

I

I

I

d X d

>

N

t c 3 0

t - - a, (I) - m

9 L

S 2 u 2 5 L

r'

0- m c V) - u 2 5 L s 0 In 03 + w w w

0 In N

0,

I

I

0 0 =l d

0 0 0- 7

I

I

I

C3 X d

>

r

t f 0

m E V) m Z

E m L (I)

m 2 5 JZ

r'

L m E 2 E a,

% 2 0 m 03 + CO CO w

7 m N

(\1 r

I

I

0 0 'Q C3

0 0 03

I

I

I

w X w

>

N

t f 0

& - - a, (I) e m

2 m - 0 0 m u 2 5 c

r'

a, 3 U .- u 0 (I)

u i 5 r r' 0 In 03 + w w w

c\i m N

0 r

I

I

0 0 0- d

0 0 0- 7

I

I

I

d X d

>

7

t

0

t - - a, (I) - m 2

u E L a L .- N m z

r m - - 3 m Y

N" In In 03 + w CO CO

c.5 In N

0,

I

I

0 0 Ln_ 7

0 0 9 0

w X d

>

N

t f 0

t - - a, (I) - .- 2 L

u i E m c

r' c m c V)

u a, a, L

2 - 3 u n a 0

%3 + w w w

d m N

C! b,

I

I

r 3 0, 0. CT).

0 0 Lo 7

I

w X d

>

7

& C 3 0

t - - a, (I) - .- 2 L

3 0) 0) m rn N m .- K

u 2 2 N .- m LL

In r- 03 + CO CO w

6 m N


LCI 2 260. 666+880 Muhammad Akram Shah Din Fruit Seller - Tenant - 1 l! 4x6 - - - -1,0001,500 - - - - - - 8

........................................................................................................................................................................................................... " ........................................................................ . .......... . ......... . Abdul Ghafoor Sweets Seller

262. 666+900 Muneer Ahmad Haii Shamas Chicken Seller Owner - 1 - V ~ ~ - 5 , 0 0 0 3 , 0 0 0 - - - - - - 6

l ~ i g u r e 2 : Roof (Codes)

1. RCC

2. RBC

3. Tiled - T-Iron, Girders

4. Tiled -Wooden Ribs

5. Tiled - Wooden Planks

6. Asbestosllron Sheets

7. Thatched

8. Katcha Pacca

9. Other Specify: (woodliron sheefftarpal)

Walls (Codes)

1. Mud


3. Brick Masonry - Pacca Bricks & Mud

4. Brick Masonry - Pacca Bricks & Cement

5. Wall Plastering - Mud

6. Wall Plastering - Cement

7. Wall Plastering - Cement Pointing

8. Katcha Pacca


Floor (Codes)

1. Mud


3. Brick Floor - with Cement Pointing

4. Brick Floor - with Plastering

5. Stone

6. Concrete

7. Concrete - Plastering

8. Concrete - Mosaic

9. Katcha Pacca


Household entries in the above table, highlighted in bold and underlined, represent households which, for reason of small income, have been designated as especially vulnerable to adverse impacts of proiect implementation. l ~ i g u r e 3 : I

NHlP revised RAP-N5 (Phase I I ) ANNEX 2

N P 2

N cn N + 01 -J 0

P I P) i %

z 3 D P

9 P) 3

9 E. .-+

4 - %

0 11 7

I-.

I <

ul I: I I

I I

I I

Q)

18

E I I

I I

N P

2

N -J CO + -J ul 0

5 I". 7

e -.

a 0 z % e -.

-0 P) X lo

0

It IN

I<

I I

I I

I I

P

18

E I I

I I

I6

E 2

N -I P + P -J ul

z 3

5 2 P m 0

% 0 0 P

S 3 X U)

I -'

IX

Q) I:. IW

I W

I N

I I

I I

IQ)

N P 2

N -J P + P ul 0

It

0 0 P O 1. 3 X U)

0

I2 IN

IX

a0 I; IW

I(D

IS

5 W h I-'

Q)

I8 IQ)

2

co 2

N -J 0 + P 01 0

b c 3 z e I c U) U)

E. s

e - P) 3

4! i?

Z P) 3

S X 0 3

0

It I-.

I<

ul I:. I I

I I

I I

ul

18

-' h I I

I I

16

2

cn

2

N -J P + 2 0

F 3

5 2 P I C fn U)

E. 3

Z D 3 -0 P) X 0 3

I-'

IX

Q) I:. IW

IW

IS

-L h I I

I I

I=

2

-J

2

N 4 P + 0 0 0

!! 2. X 3

5 P (D

2

Z! 3

0 0 P

? 3 X U)

0

I9 I-'

1Yi

Q) 1:

IW

I -'

N h I I

I I

1-

2

P

2

N -J 2 + -J 0 0

E U) e 5 3 P N

b

5 P N I c U) cn E. 3

0 0 P

z 3 X U)

P)

2

I-'

IX

ul I:. IW

IW

IN

E Q) k I I

I I

16

Type of Business

Status

No. of Persons operating business at site

Type of Structure

Size of Structure (Sq. Ft)

Roof

Wall

Floor

Est. Value of Structure (Rs.)

Monthly lncome (Rs.1

Employees (No.)

Employee's Monthly lncome (Rs.)

Offset (m)

- - - - - - - - El - ooo'l Em OOC 6 6 9 X P )I u!a lel SL9+E8ZL 9E

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 1 - oooT ooe S X P A oc JaUMO aoqs esoures

Y' 2 -0 , 0 $% $ 2 2 ?+ - 0 B 2.3 3 0 2 2$ - 3 0, $ 3 (I, a I S -3 ? o 23 BP 3s q % Q, 2~ =: m m E 5 P K g ? g 9 m (I, m a

3 3 % 0 8 3(D - 0 S 2% - 22 cn 3 ( 0 % F P =s(D 3 0 - 3 3 "'$ .i' 5'

Q

=I I I

I I

1 C)

7 0

(3

-I

WI

hl - - - XI YI

-I

el I-"

U) Y c .- & = 0 0

u E' 5 .c 3 I .- - Z

c .- m U) U) 3 I b fi c z In N cr) + CO CO

'2 K w


57. 1299+200 Shabbir Ahmed Muhammad Shabbir Fruit Seller Owner 1 ~ ~ ~ = - 1 , 0 0 0 ~ - - - - - - 6

58. 1299+203 Muhammad Shafi Muhammad Din Fruit Seller - Owner - 1 - V - = - 700 2.000 - - - - - 6

59. 1299+180 Abd -ur- Razzaq Feroze Din Fruit Seller Owner 1 V 6 x 6 - - - 1,200 3,000 - - 8

60. 1299+180 Riaz Shah Yaaob Shah Fruit Seller - Owner - 2 1 6x6 - - - 1,500 1,500 - - 8

61. 1299+200 Abdul Mannan Abdul Rehman Burqer seller owner 4 - V - 7 x 1 0 - - - - - 36,00013

66. 1302+900 Muhammad Zahid Muhammad Nisar Cold Drinks Tenant 1 - - - - - 11

67. 1304+050 Muhammad Shehbaz Muhammad Yasin Tvre Puncture - Owner - 1 - K - 4 3 1 0 3 , 5 0 0 1 , 5 0 0 - - - - 11

68. 1303+400 Mian Sultan Ahmad Mian Sharif Music Center Owner 2 K 8 x 8 6 9 1 7,000 4,000 - - 12

69. 1305+950 Shehbaz Ahmad Niaz Ahmad Nashta, Nan shop Owner 1 V 4 x 5 - - - 700 4,500 - - 13

70. 1306+778 Ghulam Nabi Muhammad lqbal Cold Drinks Owner 1 V 4 x 4 - - - 1,000 4.500 - - 7

71. 1306+780 Ghulam Mustafa Muhammad Sardar Nashta Owner 1 y M = = - 3 . 0 0 0 3 , o O o - - - - - - 10

Continues.. .


- - - - - - - - EL - ooo'e OOO'OL 6 9 9xOC U

- - - ZC - - ooo'l OOO'OZ 'i B 8x9 9 J!qseH J!WS 08L+98Z1 '8L

11 009'L 9 OOS'P 000"X P 9 8 zIxZ1 S JaUMO - - - 9 - - ooo'e ooo'oc i B F pxoC 9 aoqs ueed

- - - - - - - - - - P C - GET OOL P X P ii i ~ZZ@ syu!Ja ~ 1 0 3 ~ e q ~ peuueqnw P ~ " J ~ V !IV PLL+SOE 1 'ZL - -

... Continued

9


88. 1299+140 Ghulam Muhammad Allah Bukush Meat Seller Owner 2 5x8 = 2,500 2.500 - - - - - 9

89 1299+143 Nasir Ahmad Butt Muhammad lsmail Meat Seller - Owner - 1 - 300 3JmJ - - - - - 8

90. 1299+100 Abdul Ghani Muhammad Bashir Meat Seller - Owner - 1 ! l 6 x 8 = = - - 4 , 0 0 0 3 J m J - - - - - 10

91. 1299+150 Munir Ahmad Allah Ditta Bicycle Repairing Owner 2 - K 6 x 4 9 9 l - 500 2.500 - - - - - 10

92. 1299+150 Muhammad Arshad Muhammad Sharif Cold Drinks - Owner - 1 - K m g 9 1 5 , 0 0 0 2 , 0 0 0 - - - - - 10

93. 1299+190 MuhammadAkram Abdul Ghafoor Fruit Seller Owner 1 - V M = = - 800 3.000 - - - - - 7 .. . . . . . .........., , . . .......... . . . . .....,. . . , ,,. . . .......... , ,.. .... . . ... . , . . ..........., , , ... . .. . . . , ,.. . . .. . . . ... , , . . ... . . . , , , , ............,.. , , ,, . . . ........... , ., .. . . .. . . , ,. , ,, ,... ........ . . , , , , . . . . . . . ,,.. , , ............., ., ., ., . . . ,, ....,........ .. , , , .. . . . . , , , ,.. ........................ . . . . .. .. ,.............., , . . . . ..................... . . , , , . ... . . . . , , , ., , , , . . . . . .,,..,, , , , , . .. . ..., , , . . . . . . ., ...................... , . . . .......,,., , , . . ......, ..., , , . . . .. .,.,,...,. , . . . . . . ... ,,.., ,.. . . . . . . . .............. .......... ... .. ........ . . . . . . .........

96. 1302+850 1 - - - - K 12x10 6 9 1 20,009 3,000

97. 1304+600 Muhammad Rafiq Tea Stall Tenant 1 K 4 x 4 6 9 1 6,000 2,400 - 11

98. 1305+150 Ashiq Shirazi Karam Din Khokha Tenant 1 K 8 x 10 6 9 2 20,000 3,000 - - 10

99. 1305+500 Muhammad Ashfaq Muhammad Shafiq Tyre Puncture Owner - 1 - K - 9 2 1 0 - 500 3.000 - - - - - 19

100. 1300+500 Mansoor Ali Muhammad Abdullah Cold Drinks Tenant 1 K 7 x 8 6 9 2 30,000 6,000 - - 11

101. 1312+700 Shehzad Ali Mujtaba Ali Shah Cold Drinks Tenant 1 K 6 x 6 6 9 1 10,000 1!500 - - 'I0

102. 131 9+000 Muhammad Nazir Hameed Cold Drinks Tenant 1 K 6 x 6 6 9 1 10,000 3,000 - - 8

Continues.. .

NHlP revised RAP-N5 (Phase I I ) ANNEX 2


103. 1319+700 Muhammad Avaz Allah Rakha Cold Drinks - Tenant - 1 - K 8x6 6 3 10 30,000 3,000 - - - - - 11

104 1319+650 Muhammad Rafiq Khushi Muhammad Cold Drinks Tenant 1 - K - 12 x 8 - 6 - 9 - 1 20,000 3,000 - - - - - 10

105. 1319+800 Muhammad Munir Muhammad Saleem Cold Drinks Tenant 2 - K 6x9 6 9 2 25,000 4,000 - - - - - 13

106. 131 9+600 Muhammad Aslam Muhammad Suleman

Cold Drinks - owner - 2 - K - 1 0 x 6 - 6 - 9 - 10 15,000 3,000 - - - - - 10

107. 1299+110 Shamshad Ahmed Muhammad Yaqoob Fruit Seller Owner 1 - - - - V 1 0 x 8 - - - - 8,000 3,000 - - 10

108. 1287+150 Mushtaa Ahmad Khushi Muhammad Fruit Seller Owner 1 - V 4 x 4 = = - 1 , 5 0 0 1 , 0 0 0 - - - 15

109. 1306+900 Muhammad Boota Ferozedin Dahi Bhallev Rehri Owner 1 - V & d = = - 1 , 0 0 0 1 . 5 0 0 - - - 14

110. 1315+600 Muhammad Shafiq Muhammad Sharif Naan Pakore Owner 1 - V - = = - - - 700 2,000 - - - - - 10

11 6. 1305+945 Muhammad Mushtaq Sadar Din Tea Stall - Tenant - 2 - K -615105,0003,000 - - - - - 14

Continues.. .


0 - - 000'8 - - - - - A ysnyng ~ a a w ~


.E .bd 3 % Fa, &? E? c- s a, g% 2 .2 E c - - .s 3 0, v) 3 + 2 c , % s f p a, 2s. 5.

a o w a , 2ij 2

0 (I, e a 0 02 - , Z % E g a, 8 .g a, a, E 3 8 s k g - 2 2 LU 5 s

E LU

l ~ i ~ u r e 4 : 1 Roof (Codes) Walls (Codes) Floor (Codes)

1. RCC

2. RBC

1. Mud


1. Mud


3. Tiled - T-Iron, Girders 3.Brick Masonry - Pacca Bricks & Mud 3. Brick Floor - with Cement Pointing

4. Tiled -Wooden Ribs 4.Brick Masonry - Pacca Bricks & Cement 4. Brick Floor - with Plastering

5. Tiled -Wooden Planks 5. Wall Plasteriilg - Mud 5. Stone

6. Asbestos/lron Sheets 6. Wall Plastering - Cement 6. Concrete

7. Thatched 7. Wall Plastering - Cement Pointing 7. Concrete - Plastering

8. Katcha Pacca 8. Katcha Pacca 8. Concrete - Mosaic

9. Other Specify: (wood/iron sheetltarpal) 9.Other Specify: (woodliron sheet) 9. Katcha Pacca


There are 17 PAPS located at Lahore - Gujranwala Highway section. These people are doing the b~isiness of livestock grazinglmilk trading and are settled underneath a bridge at Chainage No. 1271 along with their more than 1000 animals (buffaloes & cows). Their residences are at Lahore city.

Household entries in the above table, highlighted in bold and underlined, represent households which, for reason of small income, have been designated as esgeciallv vulnerable to adverse impacts of proiect implementation.


Exhibit A.3: Potential Project-Affected Persons on Lahore-Gujranwala Section (from Supplementary EIA) LC L L : 5 % 5 a,

Sr. Name of Type of Chainage Respondent Father's Name Business Status - . Z - 22 g E z No. % Z .s b Y)rn,bW 0

a , cr,cr,a, w > o c n a , Z-SG Muhammad Haji Sultan

1 1287+700 lbrahim Ahmad Fruit Khokha Owner Kiosk 8x10 4000 5500 2

Muhammad - Fruit 2 1287+700 Bilal Ahmad Yousaf - Khokha Owner Kiosk 6x8 - 2500 - 4000

3 1287+700 Nasim Abbas Muhammad Latif Kulfi Rehri Owner V 4x6 1000 3500

Manzoor Muhammad Sugarcane 4 1287+700 Hussain Mukhtar Rehri Owner V 4x6 1000 3000

Shoes Muhammad Maker

5 1287+700 - Muhammad Riaz Thara Owner - 4x4 - 800 - 2500 - Muhammad Vegetable

6 1287+700 Shafiq Abdul Karim Rehri Owner V 4x6 1500 2500

Muhammad 7 1287+700 Ramzan - Abdul Rahim Fruit Rehri Owner 1! - 4x6 - 1600 - 2500

Abdul Majeed Vegetable 8 1287+675 lmtiaz Ahmad Sathi Rehri Owner V 4x6 800 2500

Muhammad Muhammad 9 1287+675 ldress Yaqub Fruit Rehri Owner V 4x6 2000 3000

Ahmad Muhammad 10 1287+675 Subhani - - Yaaub Fruit Rehri Owner Y - 4x6 - ? CCQ - 20!?!!

Sheikh Mukhtar Sheikh Allah

11 1287+675 Ahmad - - Ditta Fruit Rehri Owner - 4x6 - 1600 - 3000 -

12 1287+675 & - Fruit Rehri Owner )! 4x6 - 600 - 1500 Muhammad


Sr. Name of No. Chainage Respondent Father's Name Type of Business Status

Bashir

Shoes Maker Thara Owner 1287+675 Faryad Ali Abdul Gaffoor

Manzoor 1287+675 Hussain Ghulam Rasool

Sugarcane Rehri Owner

Muhammad 1287+675 Sharif Lal Din Fruit Rehri Owner

Sugarcane Rehri Owner 1287+675 Amanat Ali Karim Bakhsh

1287+675 Asif Ali lmdad Hussain Fruit Rehri Owner

Suqarcane Rehri Owner 1287+650 SarFraz Ahmad Arif Ali

Shabbir 1287+650 Hussain Talib Hussain Fruit Thara Owner

Muhammad 1287+650 ldrees Talib Hussain Furit Rehri Owner

Muhammad 1287+650 lsmail Sultan Ahmad Fruit Rehri Owner

Muhammad Sardar 1287+650 Ashraf Muhammad

Sugarcane Rehri Owner

~dtihariirnad iviunammaa 1287+650 Jamil Boota Fruit Rehri Owner

Fruit Rehri Owner 1287+650 Nazir Talib Hussain

Ghulam 1287+650 Hussain Marai Din Fruit Rehri Owner v - - 6x8 - 3000 - 3000 -

ANNEX 2 NHlP revised RAP-N5 (Phase II)

I< < < I< I< < I< I< < < < I < Type of Structur e

P P P e P 1% B B 1% I$ t 1% 1% ul 87 X It sire of Structur

Structur e (Rs.)

Income (Rs.1

Employ ee (No.)

I , I I I , ee's Nlonthly Income

I "o N N o 1 Offset

(m)

Sr. No.

Name of Type of Chainage Respondent Father's Name Business Status

Owner 1287+625 Arif Ali Rahim Bakhsh Fruit Rehri

Muhammad Shoes 1287+625 Yousaf Muhammad Nazir Maker Thara Owner

Muhammad Hair Dresser 1287+625 Rafiq Muhammad Sadiq Thara Owner

Ghulam 1287+625 Arshad Ali Muhammad Fruit Rehri Owner

Owner 1287+625 Naseer Ahmad Muhammad Malik Fruit Rehri

Muhammad Khushi 1287+625 ShaO Muhammad Fruit Rehri Owner

Muhammad Sugarcane 1287+600 Rafiq Ashiq Ali Rehri Owner

Sugarcane 1287+600 Amjad Allah Ditta Rehri Owner

Owner

Tenant

Owner

1287+600 Arif Aii khair Din Fruit Rehri

1287+600 lmtiaz Abdul Hameed Fruit Rehri

1287+600 Bilal Shafiq Fruit Rehri

Sheikh Vegetables 1287+600 Muhammad Asif Muhammad Sadiq Rehri Owner

52 1287+600 Shaukat Ali Barkat Ali Fruit Rehri Owner V 4x6 1200 2000

53 1287+600 Liaqat Ali - Barkat Ali Fruit Rehri Owner 4x6 1ooO - 2300 -

54 i287+600 Asniq Sheikh Barkat Ali Fruit Rehri Owner V 4x6 900 2700


Sr. Name of No. Chainage Respondent Father's Name Type of Business Status

Sha hzad Ghulam Rasool Owner

Sugarcane Rehri

Muhammad Hussain Nazir Ahmad Owner

Owner Saeed Ahmad Nazir Ahmad Fruit Rehri

Muhammad Shabbir Aiab Khan Fruit Rehri Owner

Muhammad Farooq lmdad Hussain

Habib Ahmad

Fruit Rehri

Fruit Thara

Owner

Owner lmran Saeed

Muhammad Riaz Abdul Rashid Fruit Rehri Owner

Muhammad Sadiq

Flowers Rehri Abbas Ali Owner

Muhammad Yousaf

Sugarcane Rehri Waqqas Ahmad Owner

Muhammad Riaz Mubarak Ali Fruit Rehri Owner

Muhammad Nazir -

Muhammad Hussain Owner

Muhammad Anwar Ghori

Haji Muhammad Din Fruit Rehri

Fruit Rehri

Fruit Rehri

Owner

Owner

Owner

Liaqat Ali

Mushtaq Muhammad


Sr. Name of No. Chainage Respondent Type of Father's Name Business

Sharif

Mahmood 69 1287+600 Ahmad

70 1287+600 Zulfiqar Ali A

71 1287+600 lrshad Ali

Muhammad Rafiq Fruit Rehri Owner V 4x5 1800 3200

Muhammad Latif Fruit Rehri Owner 1 4x5 - 2000 - 2000 -

Muhammad Rafiq Fruit Rehri Owner V 4x5 1500 3000

72 1287+600 lshfaq Mushtaq Fuirt Rehri Owner V 4x5 1800 2000

Ghulam Ali 73 1287+600 Hussain -

Khushi Ice-Cream Muhammad Owner 1 4x6 - 1300 2500 -

Muhammad 74 1287+575 Yousuf -

Muhammad Samosa Sharif Thara Owner 1 - 6x6 - 2000 - 2500 -

75 1287+575 Anayat Ali Barkat Ali Juice Rehri Owner V 4x5 800 2000

Khalid 76 1287+575 Mahmood

Shoes Manzoor Hussain Maker Thara Owner V 3x3 300 3000

77 1287+575 Ghulam Sakhi - Akhtar Khan Shoe Rehri Owner 4x5 1500 - 2200 -

Pop-con Gundairy Rehri Owner V 3x4 1500 3500 78 1287+575 Zarif

Muhammad 79 1287+575 lshfaq - Abdul Razzaq Fruit Rehri Owner 1 - 4x5 - 1000 - 2200 -

Shoes ~uhammad Din Maker Thara Owner V 4x4 500 3000

Muhammad Rafiq Fruit Rehri Owner 1 4x5_ - 1500 - 2500 - 81 1287+575 Fawad Ali -

Shoes Owner V 4x4 800 2800 Muhammad Makers

82 1287+575 Abid Hussain


x 03 Y2 m X

d d d ""I d (Y 1 + - * z Z % E Z d

!!? L

Q m P! O e e Z L L E ' m t $ = $ = C o x m E m pa, ga, Q U3z ILK LLK

i o (I) 2

.- m m

K a, C L a, 5 5

tu 0 0 O 0 a: !2 m 'r = m 'c G G - $ 1 $2 2

c '-

~ l a : LL $ 2 m 2 a LL

0- .- n -0 0

a, m E .- (I) s E .- -0 c -0 z . 0

Z c 7 2 2 .- m m V) m 2 a: 7 =

m E 5 2 E c c * 2 t E .z m - E m m 5 5 3 2

5 2 E 2 5 2 2 g 0 -a L b m '3 2 m 0 2 2 2 (I) z a S 5 m + 9 K z

- E t: m .- - -0

$

E 5 2 - c I

5 a m u L E ; 2 4 LL

Sr. Name of No. Chainage Respondent Type of Business Status Father's Name

Muhammad 1287+575 Hanif

Vegetables Rehri Owner Subay Khan

Sugarcane Rehri Owner 1287+575 Abdul Rashid Lal Din

Mukhtar 1287+575 Ahmad Nazir Ahmad Fruit Rehri Owner

Muhammad 1287+575 Nadeem Naz Gareeb llahi Fruit Rehri Owner

1287+575 Nadeem Sheikh Yasein Fruit Rehri Owner

Muhammad Ash raf

Pakora Thara Owner 1287+575 Abid Ali

Muhammad 1287+575 W f

Muhammad Ashraf Fruit Rehri Owner

Flowers Rehri Owner 1287+575 Sabir Pivva

1287+575 Sheikh Nadeem

Muhammad Ali

Abdul Majeed Fruit Rehri Owner

1287+575 Arif Ali Khair Din Fruit Rehri Owner

Sheikh 1287+575 Muhammad ljaz

Sheikh M. Hussain Fruit Thara Owner

Fruit Rehri Owner 1287+575 lrfan Nadeem Nazir Ahmad

1287+575 Shabbir Ahmad

1287+575 lrfan Saeed

1287+575 Faryad Hussain

Khair Din Fruit Rehri Owner

Habib Ahmad

Rashid Ahmad

Fruit Thara Owner

Fruit Thara Owner


k "J "J F n L .- ([I I

u -0 - .- rr u 0

g z u--0

:s a E E 2 m a , .c zrr u,

u m a, c 2 m r E

E "3 .- 2 3s 2"

Z A A A A 2 A A A A 2 A A A

z w w w w w a a, Ir I:: I:: 14 :: h) h) u -4 0 ul w -4 N 0 g?'

< < < < < I< I< I < I< < < < < < Type of Structur

P e z e f ? f? x e P P P E ul ul ul ul 1% 1% 1% 1; 8 8 " ul ul ul f? Size of N Structur

e

I I I I

ril ril N ril 0 0 0 0

2 0 8 -L h) A 2 A

a, 0 lg 12 It I 0 ) N W

0 0 0 0 0 0 0

w W W W ril

h ) N W 4 a, 0

0 11 11 It lx g g

A A Est. P ril o o g Value 0 0 0 of

Structur e (Rs.)

w w w 0 0 ril 0 0 o o 8 Monthly

Income (Rs.)

Employ ee (No.)

I , ee's Monthly Income

w N o Offset (m)

L O r hl C3 b V) (D b cO 0 % "4 1 51 f l 21 f 2 s f l f f f f 7 ,

k - .- 2 ,-a

V) = 6 2 5 x Y

U)

([I 0 V) 0 0 x -0

m K .- ([I V) V) 3 I

-0

a, t 5 -0 u u 5 z t

e 2 s

([I x € 2 2 % .S 3

5.. E . 6 . g 5 I x - e 2 : x u S

0 an1 S $ s g 5 Z

Sr. Name of No. Chainage Respondent Type of Father's Name Business Status

Ghulam 1306+900 Hussain Sarai Din Fruit Rehri Owner

Muhammad Aslam

Flowers Rehri 1306+900 Ziafat Ali Owner

Muhammad Bashir 1306+900 Riasat Fruit Rehri Owner

Malik M. 1306+900 Arshad

Sugarcane Rehri Sharif

Allah Ditta

Owner

Owner 1306+900 Malik M. Younis Fruit Rehri

Sugarcane Rehri 1306+900 Zulfiqar

1306+900 Abdul Rehman

Rashid

Muhammad Din

Owner

Owner Fruit Thara

Sugarcane Rehri 1306+900 Abbas

1306+900 Ghulam Rasool

1306+900 Khalil

Allah Ditta Owner

Owner

Owner

Noor Muhammad Fruit Rehri

Fruit Rehri Habib

Muhammad 1306+900 Younis

Sardar Muhammad Fruit Rehri Owner

Muhammad 1306+900 Akram

Muhammad P.afiq

Suaarcan @&i Owner V - 4x5 - ?5QO - ? 800 -

v - 4x5 - 1500 2200 -

v - - 4x6 2200 1800 -

ANNEX 2

Muhammad 1306+900 Boota Fruit Rehri

Adiocasset S -

Owner

1306+900 Hamavun Babar Hussain Owner

NHlP revised RAP-N5 (Phase II)

Sr' Chainage Name of No. Respondent Father's Name

rC L L

0 2 a, 3 - &a, =-.z

Type of % 5 o 3 22 5 g . 5 -

Status g 2 CI - a& Business hk $ 2 f f l m c b V O O W + m a , zza, w > o m a , z 5 G E a, w a,

Shoes Maker Owner y 168 1306+900 Mubarak Ali - Nawab Din

Muhammad 169 1306+900 Khurshid - Jamal Din

Watch Showcase Owner y

Muhammad 170 1306+900 Abdul Rashid Saddiaue - Fruit Rehri Owner 1

Fruit Rehri Owner V 171 1306+900 Amin Muhammad Boota

Muhammad 172 1306+900 Saeed - Bashir Ahmad Fruit Rehri Owner y

Muhammad 1306+900 Riaz Allah Din Fruit Rehri Owner V

Muhammad Muhammad 1306+900 Naeem Asnhar Fruit Rehri Owner y

Sheikh 1306+900 Sheikh Shahid Muhammad Sharif Fruit Rehri Owner V

Sheikh Riaz Muhammad 1306+900 Ahmad lsmail Fruit Rehri Owner y

Sufi - Muhammad Muhammad

1306+900 Jamil Bashir Vegetables Rehri Owner y

Fruit Rehrl Owner V -

Muhammad 1306+900 Saeed Bashir Ahmad Fruit Rehri Owner y

Flowers Rehri Owner )! 1306+900 Shamshad Ali Asqhar Ali


w- L L

0 2 % 2 a, 2 , a , g z 2 a, Sr. Name of Type of u . O f f l 5 E, -

Father's Name Business Status $ 5 n t 5 E 5 No. Chainage Respondent E 2 CI % - $ 8 ~ E a, -:'08 ez

a , a , w > o v , a , 2 5 % W a, a,IS 0 -

Shahbaz 181 1306+900 Ahmad Noor Muhammad Fruit Rehri Owner V 4x5 1600 3000

Muhammad 182 1306+900 Akhtar Muhammad Sharif Fruit Rehri Tenant V 4x5 1800 3000

Household entries in the above table, highlighted in bold and underlined, represent households which, for reason of small income, have been designated as especially vulnerable to adverse impacts of proiect implementation.


Exhibit A.4: Potential Project-Affected Persons on Tarnol-Chablat Highway Section

Type of Business Father's Name Status

Muhammad 1 1570+000 Ahsraf Malik Muhammad Peanut Seller Darvaish Owner 1

2 1570+000 Javed Akhtar - Su arcane Ameer Sultan Seler Owner 1 -

1570+000 : Ali Muhammad Mukhtar Atta Machine i Owner - 1

Sugercane Muhammad Jan Seller Owner 1 4 1570+000 Hazrat Khan

5 1570+000 Tahir Shahzad i Owner 1 Sher Muhammad Fruits Seller

6 i570+000 idunamama Khan ia i Knan Fruits Seiier Owner 1

7 1570+000 lsmail Khan Sarfraz Khan I Fruits Seller i Owner 1


No. of persons operating business at site

Type of Structure

Size of Structure (Sq Ft)

Est Value of Structure (Rs.1

Respondent Monthly Income (Rs.)

Employee (No.) 1 Employee's Monthly

Income (Rs.)

Offset (m) I

35 1570+000 Sharif

Sr' No.

36 1570+000 Ali Muhammad - Muhammad Nazir Dw Fruits Seller

Rashid

Chainage

39 1570+200 Qasir Mehrnood Mehrnood Khan

Name of Respondent

Fruits Seller

Father's Name

Owner 1 V 1,200 2.000 5

Type of Business Status

Owner - 1 - v - - 4 x 6 1,300 2,200 I 5 - -

Owner 1 V 6 x 8 6,000 5,700 5

1,200 1,800

m s .- u !? aJ a3 .% P V) 0 u V) c V)

0 8 g .E Q 2 z Q 6 Z

Owner 1 V 4 x 4 1,630 5

Owner 1 V 6 x 6 - 4,000 5

2 3 u 0

2 5 b 0 Q) Q

40 1570+200 Abdul Qayurn

1 15701200 Fizan Khan

z =I u 0 s = 5 LL m a - ze

Q) .- N V)

iviansab Khan Fruits Seller Owner - 1 !! 4 x 4 - - 1,800 : 5 - -

z =I u 0

u 2 V)- lCt i

C - 3 E u V) w

/ 42 1570+200 Zaheer Baber Abdul Qayyurn Sugercane Seller Owner 1 V 4 x 6 1,400 2,000 - 5

: Mian Gul

- %

5 s - 0 ti E C s Q)

$ E S S 0 s P- V)

2

I Tools Seller Owner - I !! - 4 x 4 -

0 ?

5. Q) Q)

- $ E w


>r - C h 5 0 V)

ZE.

2; Q)

s t - g- W

E - u Q)

$ 0

44 1570+000 ljaz Ahmad : Umer Khan i Fruits Seller Owner 1 V 1,200 2,500 - 5

1,800

* - c A 5 0 V)

= 5 .@a t s s! - E- W

Srs No.

45 1570+000 Muhammad lbrahim Muhammad Ashraf Fruits Seller

A

E - * a g 0

!! 3 u

g p t j m ~2 0 .- N v,

Owner 1 V x 6 1,300 2,800 5

Chainage

46 1570+000 Murntaz -

e 3 u 0

2 u a, I C a O c r a - 3 - s u V) w

Sarfaraz Fruits Seller Owner - I !! - 1.300 2,300 - - 5

- * 5 c

28 u-

g E a

s f a- V)

2

Name of Respondent

47 1570+000 Muhammad Ashfaq Sheikh Ahmad

h

d 5 Q) Q) * 0 - E w

0 C .- CI

E Q) Q) .e a V) 0 CI

V) * s ! g .E a2 d z

Furits Seller

Father's Name

Q) L 3 u 0 2 tj Ic 0 Q)

Owner 1 V 1,200 2.700 - 5

50 1570+000 Abdullah Khan

Type of Business

Shukar Din . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Status

Shoes Seller ............

Owner 1 V 1,200 2,500 5

51 1570+000 Akhtar Hussain Muhammad Zad . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Plants Seller Owner . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .


No. of persons operating business at site

Type of Structure

Size of Structure (Sq Ft)

Est Value of Structure (Rs.1

Respondent Monthly Income (Rs.)

Employee (No.)

Employee's Monthly Income (Rs.)

Offset (m)

ANNEX 2: ENTITLEMENT MATRIX

5065019 - Contract Administration and Construction Supervision for Highway Rehabilitation Project - Pakistan N5(Phase I I ) Resettlement Action Plan, October 2007

& % G ~ & ~ S M E C %Z?V& Resettlement Policy Framework

A6-1 Entitlement Matrix Under Resettlement Plan

The governing legislation governing land acquisition and compensation is the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The LAA is limited to a cash compensation policy for the acqu.isition of land and built-up property, and damage to other assets such as crops, trees, and infrastructure. The LAA does not take into account the rehabilitation and resettlement of displaced populations and the restoration of their livelihoods.

To address these concerns, a Draft National Resettlement Policy and relate~d Draft National Resettlement Ordinance were prepared following a national consultative proc~ess. Both World Bank policies on resettlement as well as the Draft National Resettlement Policy provide full protection to squatters. Taking into account the requirements of the LAA, thle Draft National Resettlement Policy, and World Bank policies, an entitlement matrix resettlement policy was developed to define compensation for the acquisition of land and built-up property and for resettling PAPs operating within the CoI 1, and therefore subject to involuntary relocation. This is summarized in matrix form in Section 6 (above)

The basic principles of the matrix as applicable to Phase I1 RMP are as follows:

= The NHA will ensure that as far as possible, squatters' business earnings are not affected by resettlement.

The NHA will help shift affected squatters to the nearest possible location within the ROW, and provide alternative structures to squatters whose original structures cannot be moved any further back into the ROW

The owners of affected structures will be allowed to salvage their building material.

Squatters will be provided an income safety net cushioning them against potential delays in re-establishing them at alternative sites.

= Encroachments, i.e., structures that have been established on proprietary land, part of which extends into the ROW, owned by non-vulnerable PAPs will removed without any compensation.

A5-2 Institutional Arrangements for Implementation

The NHA's federal General Manager (GM) Environment/Social and Lands vtill have overall responsibility for ensuring project compliance with the EMP and RAP. The GM EnvironmentISocial and Lands will be supported by a DirectorDeputy Director (DIDD) SocialAnfrastructure and Land Management, in turn assisted by an Assistant Directors (AD). In each province, the implementation of the project will be managed by a regional GM assisted by a Project Coordinator. The Project Coordinator will, in turn, supervise a t e rn of Deputy Project Coordinators assigned to individual contracts for highway sections in that province. The regional GM will also be assisted by a regional DDIAD SocidAnfi-astructure and Land Management, and a regional Director Operations.

There will also be a Social and Resettlement Committee operating in each province, consisting of the regional Director Operations, regional DDIAD SocialAnfrastructure and Land Management, regional Project Coordinator, and federal D/DD Social/Infrastructure and

5065019 - Contract Administration and Construction Super-vision for Highway Rehabilitation Project - Pakistan NS(Phase II) Resettlement Action Plan, October 2007

&f$&& ~ M E C Resettlement Policy Framework %%>$~/#h 1 I \ V O V L L I V I I I V I I L I W l l V J I I L L I I I V V V W I L Y

Land Management. Each committee will be responsible for coordinating the project's social implementation and monitoring issues in its respective province, and reporting to the regional GM and the GM Environment/Social and Lands. The committee will be required to convene quarterly, although may need to meet on a monthly basis in the initial stages of the project. Each regional DDIAD Social/Infrastructure and Land Management will supervise a Land Acquisition Collector (LAC) and his lower staff in matters relating to land acquisition and management in their respective provinces. The regional DD Operations will be responsible for implementing the RAP and will be assisted by the AD Operations and IvIanagement, the AD Maintenance and Monitoring, and their team of field-based supervisors/'inspectors in the concerned reach.

Specifically, the NHA's resettlement staff will ensure that the following activities are carried out transparently and according to acceptable standards under Phase I1 RMP:

= Identifying and verifying PAPs on the basis of specified documents

Identifying which public facilities and utilities need to be relocated, arid whether in the case of water pumps, alternative sources of water are available

Identifying alternative resettlement sites for PAPs within the ROW

Carrying out a consultation and dissemination campaign with regard to compensation procedures, entitlement packages, and proposed alternative resettlement sites

Identifying any problems due to restricted access to the highway during construction, and verifying whether rampsldiversions have been provided where required

Establishing a grievance redressal committee to ensure fairness and transparency during the resettlement process

Preparing a joint on-site inventory and valuation of the affected assets and incomes of individual PAPs

Preparing individual entitlement files

= Preparing and approving compensation budgets

Ensuring an adequate notice period is given to PAPs before shifting

= Constructing alternative kiosks within the ROW prior to shifting PAPs and handing the remaining section to the 'contractor

= Signing kiosk leases and recording compensation payments in case of delays

Providing shifting assistance to displaced squatters and to squatter-owners allowed to salvage their facilities

Timing the lag between PAPS' vacation of structures within the proposed construction and being resettled in their new kiosks

Identifying major issues of conflict between PAPs and the NHAIcontractors during implementation of resettlement activities.

5065019 - Contract Administration and Construction Supervision for Highway Rehabilitation Project - Pakistan N5(Phase 11) Resettlement Action Plan, October 2007

ANNEX 3 - SOCIO-ECONOMIC BASELINE QUESTIONNAIRE

SOCIO-ECONOMIC BASELINE SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE: SCREENING STUDY (PHASE-11)

1. Identification

Chainage

Offset (m>

Section

Road Side: SB NB Median

Name of Respondent Father's Name

Location: Town/Village/Mauza: Sub-village:

Tehsil: District

Province:

2. Household Durable Goods

Item No. Item (=.I No. Value

(Rs-I

Refrigerator Car r 7 Deep freezer rl Television 0

VCR r-7 Washing machine

1 Dish Antenna O D Geyser 0 Electric fan

Electric iron n ) Air Conditioner

Sewing machine 1 Power Generator

Radioltape recorder El Electric Water Pump

Bicycle OI Computer n I' 5065019 - Contract Administration and Construction Supervision for Highway Rehabilitation Project - Pakistan N5(Phase I I ) Resettlement Action Plan, October 2007

Motor cycle/ scooter U Microwave Oven 0 1 1 Rickshaw Other O r I l

3. AVERGGE MONTHLY EXPENDITURE ON FOOD AND

NON-FOOD ITEMS

3.1 Food and Non-Food Items

Food Items No.

Vegetables

Fruit

Milk

Sugar

Flour

Non-Food Items No. Value @s.) (Rs.)

Washing soap

Bathing soap I TI Kerosene oil

Auto Fuel /

Transportation

Rice / r-- I I

Other (spec&)

4. CREDIT

4.1 : Did you receive credit?

If yes, Purpose of Loan

House

Business (ShopKhokha)

Other (speclfi)

(Tick)

Rs. [

Rs. [

Rs. [

5065019 - Contract Administration and Construction Supervision for Highway Rehabilitation Project - Pakistan N5(Phase II) Resettlement Action Plan, October 2007

4.2: Mode of repayment of credit (Rs.):

Lumpsum Yes0

Through installments Yes0

Quarterly Yes0

Six monthly Yes

Annual Yes0

5. HOUSING CONDITIONS

No. of Katcha Type of Room Room (tick)

Katcha + Present Pacca

Pacca Other Value (tick) (tick) (Rs ..)

Remarks

Living rooms

Animal shedfroom n Other shed etc. n Bathroom n I

LATRINE

- Open

- Flush n o - Other n o

6. ACCESS TO SOCIAL AMENITIES

Social Amenities Distance

Electricity

Sui Gas

Water Supply

Telephone

Seweragemrainage

5065019 - Contract Administration and Construction Supervision for Highway Rehabilitation Project - Pakistan N5(Phase I I ) Resettlement Action Plan, October 2007

Kerosene oil

Fuel wood

7. OTHER ASSETS

Remarks

House Area (ft):

Hand pump (No.):

Donkey pump (No.):

Elec. Motor (No.):

Other (speczb) (No.):

8. LIVESTOCK INVENTORY

Livestock No. Present Value

(h.1

Buffaloes

Cows

Horse

Donkey

Camel SheepIGoat

Poultry Other

Present Value

( f i e )

9. WOMEN PARTICIPATION IN DIFFERENT ACTIVITIES

9.1 Extent of women participation in different household activities:

Extent of Activities Participation


("/.I

Household activities

Child caring

F d c r o p activities

Livestock rearing

Sale & Purchase of properties

Social obligations (marriage,

birthday & otherfilnctions)

Local representation (councilor/

political gathering;)

10. RESPONDENT PERCEPTIONS OF ACTIONS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROJECT

Extent of Impact

% Increase % Decrease

Possible impacts/effects of the Proiect

Employment opportunities I4 Marketing facilities

Living standard

Unemployment

Income generating activities u

Other specify

11. GENERAL REMARKS OF THE RESPONDENT: (Resettlement/displacement, transition, compensation etc.)


GENERAL OBSERVATIONS OF THE INTERVIEWER:

Name & Signature of Interviewer: Date:


ANNEX 4: CENSUS SURVEY QUESTIONAIRE


NA TIONAL HIGHWA Y A UTHORTTY (iyI?IA)

CENSUS SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE: SEABA STUDY

(PHASE-I I )

IDENTIFICATION

Section Chainage

Road Side: SB NB Median Offset (m)

Name of Respondent Father's Name

Respondent ID No:

Category of Respondent: (Tick relevant)

Residents (Owner) Squatter

El Resident (Tenant) El Encroacher

Resident (Absentee) Other (specify)

• Business Owner operator Other (specify)

Business Tenant operator

Absentee Business operator

Site Location: Sub-Village1 Dhok: Village1 Tow)

Tehsill Taluka District

Province

Permanent Address:

2. DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE

1 Family members (above 10 years)

S r.

0.

5065019 - Contract Administration and Construction Supervision for Highway Rehabilitation Project - Pakistan NS(Phase II) Resettlement Action Plan, October 2007

1. Respondent

Name Relationship

with respondent

Sex

(M F)

Age

(Yrs.)

Name of Business1 Occupation

M ' o n t h l ~ Income

(Rs.) At Site Other than

Site

Annual Other* Earnings

(Rs.1

Resident at Site F I N )

I I Children (=< 10 years) No.

I I *Other: Rent from property, remittances, net sale of items during a year, net income from agriculture ,etc.

3. DETAILS OF STRUCTURES

Structure Information of Business/Shop/Khokha

Do you have ownership documents Yes D, No

Types of Structure (Codes)

Roof (Codes) Walls (Codes) Fkoor (Codes)

1. RCC 1. Mud I . Mud

2. RBC 2. Brick Masonry - Katcha Bricks 2. Brick Flooir - Bricks only

3. Tiled - T-Iron, Girders 3. Brick Masonry - Pacca Bricks & Mud 3. Brick Floor - With Cement Pointing

4. Tiled - Wooden Ribs 4. Brick Masonry - Pacca Bricks & Cement 4. Brick Floor - with Plastering

5. Tiled - Wooden Planks 5. Wall Plastering - Mud 5. Stone

6. Asbestos/Iron Sheets 6. Wall Plastering - Cement 6. Concrete


7. Thatched 7. Wall Plastering - Cement Pointing 7. Concrete -- Plastering

8. Katcha Pacca 8. Katcha Pacca 8. Concrete -- Mosaic

9. Other Specify: 9. Other Specify: 9. Katcha Pacca

10. Other Specify:

3.2 Structure Information of HouselBuilding Do you have ownership documents Yes n, No n

4. EMPLOYEES DESCRIPTION How many employees do you have? [ ] No.

Cons- const. cost true- at Present

tion

506501 9 - Contract Administration and Construction Supervision for Highway Rehabilitation Project - Pakistan N5(Phase II) Resettlement Action Plan, October 2007

Sr. No.

1.

2.

3.

Structure

Living Rooms

Extended Struc.

(Animal Shed

Cost

(Rs.)

Sr.

1.

2.

Type of Struc. (Code) Size (ft)

4.

1.

2.

Name of Employee

Width Floor Length Roof

etc.)

Kitchen (No.)

Bathrooms (Latriize (No.)

Other-

Nature of Employ-

ment

Wall

3.

4.

1

2

Average

Income (Rs.1

Other* Annual l ~ c o m e

Stay at Site (Tick)

Total Family Member

wO.) Alone With Family

Fem- ale

(No.)

Child -ren

wo.)

4.

5.

*Other: Rent from property, remittances, net sale of items during a year, net income from agriculture etc.

5. OTHER ASSETS

ASSETS

Hand PumpDonkey Pump

Other (speczh)

fi I

Electric motor

Other (speczB) I I

I Shade trees

TREES

Fruits trees

6. DESCRIPTIVE QUESTIONS

( ~ r s )

6.1 This road is undergo major repairlimprovement, for this purpose government has to displace you, do you have some other place to move? YesO, N o 0

If Yes: 1. How far away from this place? km

2. Do you own this place Yes

6.2 Community Perceptions associated with the road rehabilitatiodimprovement project:

What kind of assistance you expect from the Government/Project?

I I

Land 1 Type of Assistance1 Compensation

1 Structure I I

Construction

Extent of compensation

(%>


Expected Amount of

compensation1 assistance (Rs.)

1 Transportation

1 Place for Resettlement: Yes 0, No

5065019 - Contract Administration and Construction Supervision for Highway Rehalbilitation Project - Pakistan N5(Phase II) Resettlement Action Plan, October 2007

7. CREDIT

7.1 Assistance for getting credit Yes 0, No q

If yes: Purpose of Loan (Tick):

House [ 1 Business (Shop/Khokha) [ 1 Other (specify) [ 1

7.2 Mode of repayment of credit (Rs.):

i) Lumpsum YesU, N o 0

ii) Through installments YesO, N o 0

Quarterly Yes 0 , ]\To q o Six monthly YesO, N o 0

Annual Yes 0 , No q

8. IN CASE OF TENANT:

8.1 Name of Owner: Name of Occupation/Business -

Av. Monthly Income (Rs.) Av. Monthly Rent (Rs.)

8.2 Have you made any investment: Yes 0 , No q

8.3 If yes, fill table below:

Rehri

Thatched Shed

Other (speczfi)

Other (spec&)

5065019 - Contract Administration and Construction Supervision for Highway Rehabilitation Project - Pakistan N5(Phase Il) Resettlement Action Plan, October 2007

Structure

House (Rooms)

Estimated Cost

(Rs.)

Size (ft) Year of Construction W

Cost for Similar Replacement (Rs.) L

9. GENERAL REMARKS OF THE RESPONDENT:

10. GENERAL OBSERVATIONS OF THE INTERVIEWER:

Name & Signature of Interviewer: Date:

506501 9 - Contract Administration and Construction Supervision for Highway Rehabilitation Project - Pakistan N5(Phase I I ) Resettlement Action Plan, October 2007

ANNEX 5: TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR PREPARATION (OF RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN (RAP)



Documents

PAKISTAN HIGHWAY REHABILITATION PROJECT … HIGHWAY REHABILITATION PROJECT Resettlement Plan-N-5 (Phase 11) Document Stage: Final Project Number: 3 846 PAK November 2007 Prepared by