1
The quality of these a priori estimates of blend ash points testies to the quality of representation of molecular interactions by HSPs. Lower Explosive Limit (LEL). Consider a blend of methyl formate and dimethyl etherdnot a likely blend of cleaning solvents, but one for which blend LEL data are available. From Appendix A1, the component LEL values are 4.5 and 3.3 volume percent, respectively. The blend composition, in air, is 75 and 25 volume %, respectively. Accordingly, the blend LEL was calculated using Equation A2-18 as 3.56 vol.%, as shown in Equation A2-18. The measured value was 3.65 vol.% AA . LEL blend ¼ ½0:75 þ 0:25 & 0:75 0:045 ' þ & 0:25 0:033 ' ¼ 0:0356 A2 18 Notice that the total composition is not needed in this calculation, because it appears in both the numerator and denominator. Upper Explosive Limit (UEL). Consider a blend of heptane and chloroform. This blend was tested by the US Army in 1950 to determine whether chloroform was an effective ame suppressant BB . They measured its upper explosive limit in heptane (and air), and compared the measured values to those of other blends to learn which halogenated solvents best suppressed combustion. Heptane and chloroform were present at equal volumes (5%), in the vapor phase. Testing was done at 25 C. From Appendix A1, literature values of the UELs for chloro- form and heptane are 12.9 and 6.7 volume percent, respectively. Accordingly, the blend UEL was calculated as 8.8 vol.%, as shown in Equation A2-18. The measured value was 9.3 vol.%. UEL blend ¼ ½0:05 þ 0:05 & 0:05 :129 ' þ & 0:05 0:067 ' ¼ 0:088 A2 18 Relative Evaporation Rate (RER) of Blends. Consider a blend of octane and toluene, two solvents with relatively similar HSPs as their R A is only 5.5 MPa ½ . The blend of 70.56 wt. % octane is prepared and allowed to evaporate, and both the overall and individual evaporation rates are measured with the aid of a gas chromatograph CC over time until the blend is fully evaporated. From Appendix A1, Table 4, RER values for octane and toluene are 1.984 and 1.230, both evaporating more readily than n-butyl acetate. RER blend ðn BuAc ¼ 1Þ ¼ 1 & 0:6602 1:984 ' þ & 0:3398 1:230 '! ¼ 1:642 AA2 19A Estimation of Properties of Solvent Blends A2 Appendix 499

Pages From 499

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Pages From 499

Citation preview

  • The quality of these a priori estimates of blend flashpoints testifies to the quality of representation of molecularinteractions by HSPs.

    Lower Explosive Limit (LEL). Consider a blend ofmethyl formate and dimethyl etherdnot a likely blend ofcleaning solvents, but one for which blend LEL data areavailable. From Appendix A1, the component LEL valuesare 4.5 and 3.3 volume percent, respectively. The blendcomposition, in air, is 75 and 25 volume %, respectively.Accordingly, the blend LEL was calculated using EquationA2-18 as 3.56 vol.%, as shown in Equation A2-18. Themeasured value was 3.65 vol.%AA.

    LELblend 0:75 0:25

    0:750:045

    0:250:033

    0:0356A218

    Notice that the total composition is not needed in thiscalculation, because it appears in both the numerator anddenominator.

    Upper Explosive Limit (UEL). Consider a blend ofheptane and chloroform. This blend was tested by the USArmy in 1950 to determine whether chloroform was aneffective flame suppressantBB. They measured its upperexplosive limit in heptane (and air), and compared themeasured values to those of other blends to learn whichhalogenated solvents best suppressed combustion.

    Heptane and chloroform were present at equal volumes(5%), in the vapor phase. Testing was done at 25C. FromAppendix A1, literature values of the UELs for chloro-form and heptane are 12.9 and 6.7 volume percent,respectively.

    Accordingly, the blend UEL was calculated as 8.8 vol.%, asshown inEquationA2-18. Themeasured valuewas9.3vol.%.

    UELblend 0:05 0:05

    0:05:129

    0:050:067

    0:088 A218

    Relative Evaporation Rate (RER) of Blends. Considera blend of octane and toluene, two solvents with relativelysimilar HSPs as their RA is only 5.5 MPa

    . The blend of70.56 wt. % octane is prepared and allowed to evaporate,and both the overall and individual evaporation rates aremeasured with the aid of a gas chromatographCC over timeuntil the blend is fully evaporated.

    From Appendix A1, Table 4, RER values for octane andtoluene are 1.984 and 1.230, both evaporating morereadily than n-butyl acetate.

    RERblend n BuAc 1 1

    0:66021:984

    0:33981:230

    1:642

    AA219A

    Estimation of Properties of Solvent Blends A2 Appendix

    499