9
73 rd IETF – Minneapolis, MN, November 2008 Page - 1 Information Model for Impaired Optical Path Validation Greg Bernstein [email protected] Grotto Networking Young Lee [email protected] Huawei Dan Li [email protected] Huawei draft-bernstein-wson-impairment- info-00.txt

Page - 1 73 rd IETF – Minneapolis, MN, November 2008 Information Model for Impaired Optical Path Validation Greg [email protected] Grotto

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

PowerPoint Presentation - Optical Network Control OverviewGreg Bernstein [email protected] Grotto Networking
Young Lee [email protected]
Huawei
draft-bernstein-wson-impairment-info-00.txt
Page - *
Introduction
Impairments in optical networks can be accounted for in a number of ways as discussed in the Impairment Framework draft . This draft provides an information model for path validation in optical networks utilizing approximate computations.
The definitions, characteristics and usage of the optical parameters that form this model are based on ITU-T recommendation G.680.
This impairment related model is intentionally compatible with the impairment free model of reference [RWA-Info].
Page - *
Optical Signal to Noise Ratio (OSNR)
Residual Dispersion (CD)
Channel Ripple
System Transients
Channel Uniformity
The impact is dependent upon the signal type and rate
Page - *
Apply to the network element (NE) as a whole
Get one parameter of each particular type in this category per NE
Vary on a per port basis
Get one parameter of each particular type in this category per NE port. Not all parameters different so smart encoding can save “space”.
Vary based on port to port pairs
Get one parameter of each particular type in this category per (ingress port, egress port) pair. Not all parameters different so smart encoding can save “space”.
These categories are inferred from ITU-T G.680 and are useful for control plane purposes and don’t change G.680.
Page - *
Channel extinction (dB, Min)
Channel gain (dB, Max, Min)
Page - *
Input reflectance (dB, Max) (with amplifiers)
Output reflectance (dB, Max) (with amplifiers)
Maximum reflectance tolerable at input (dB, Min)
Maximum reflectance tolerable at output (dB, Min)
Maximum total output power (dBm, Max)
Page - *
Ripple (dB, Max)
Differential group delay (ps, Max)
Polarization dependent loss (dB, Max)
Reflectance (passive component) (dB, Max)
Reconfigure time/Switching time (ms, Max, Min)
Channel uniformity (dB, Max)
Transient duration (ms, Max)
Multichannel gain-change difference (inter-channel gain-change difference) (dB, Max)
Multichannel gain tilt (inter-channel gain-change ratio)(dB, Max)
Page - *
Cascade formulas given in sections 9 and 10 of G.680
Example Optical SNR:
Where to Pin,i are the channel powers in dBm at the inputs to the ONEs or amplifiers on the relevant path through the network; and NFi are the noise factors of the amplifiers or ONEs on the relevant path through the network.
Page - *
Issues
Not all parameters are necessarily used in all situations. Should default values be explicitly specified in draft?
Transmitter and Receiver characteristics are not specified in G.680 but in other ITU-T recommendations. Should these be including in info model? Connection request?
Not all impairments are included in G.680 – Our approach is to begin with what G.680 has defined.
Compact Encodings are possible when per port or port-to-port parameters repeat. Define encodings here or another document?
32-bit floating point for all parameters for simplicity?