29
Paediatric Abdominal Trauma LA Hodsdon Oct 09 UPDATE ON BURNS MANAGEMENT IN CHILDREN UPDATE ON BURNS MANAGEMENT IN CHILDREN

Paediatric Abdominal Trauma

  • Upload
    tejano

  • View
    67

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Paediatric Abdominal Trauma. UPDATE ON BURNS MANAGEMENT IN CHILDREN. UPDATE ON BURNS MANAGEMENT IN CHILDREN. LA Hodsdon Oct 09. Considerations. Incidence Type Anatomical Considerations History & Examination Diagnostic Modalities Suggested Investigative Approaches . Incidence:. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Paediatric Abdominal Trauma

Paediatric Abdominal Trauma

LA HodsdonOct 09

UPDATE ON BURNS MANAGEMENT IN CHILDRENUPDATE ON BURNS MANAGEMENT IN CHILDREN

Page 2: Paediatric Abdominal Trauma

Considerations

• Incidence• Type• Anatomical Considerations• History & Examination• Diagnostic Modalities• Suggested Investigative Approaches

Page 3: Paediatric Abdominal Trauma

Incidence:

• Abdominal Trauma:

– 8-10% admissions to Paediatric Trauma Centres– 3rd most frequent cause of death ()– MOST COMMON UNRECOGNIZED FATAL INJURY– NAI – 5% admitted with Abdominal Trauma

Page 4: Paediatric Abdominal Trauma

Type of Injury:

• Blunt Abdominal Trauma:

– 85% of paeds abdo trauma (US/UK)– > 50 due to MVA’s– Other common causes bicycles, sports, falls, NAI

• RSA ?% Penetrating Trauma – Likely to be >15%

Page 5: Paediatric Abdominal Trauma

Anatomical Considerations:

• Solid Organs: proportionally larger & more anterior

• Kidneys: larger, more mobile +/- foetal lobulations

• Subcutaneous Fat: ↓• Abdominal Musculature: ↓• AP Diameter: ↓• Flexible Cartilaginous Ribcage

Page 6: Paediatric Abdominal Trauma

• Increased Solid Organ Injury– Both Blunt & Penetrating Injury

• GIT Trauma not uncommon– Duodenal & Small Bowel haematomas &

perforation– Pancreatic injuries– Mesenteric lacerations

Page 7: Paediatric Abdominal Trauma

History & Examination:

• Age dependant

• Often difficult for kids to localise / verbalise

• FEAR– Often hard to reassure– Fear of unknown / vague concepts– Separation– Fear of Medical Personnel

Page 8: Paediatric Abdominal Trauma

• Haemodynamically stable child- who is alert and co-operative- able to communicate effectively

history and examination approach reliability rates of adults

Page 9: Paediatric Abdominal Trauma

2004 Poletti et al:Awake, haemodynamically stable (adults): abdo pain, tenderness & peritoneal signs more reliable physical signs & can be found in 90%

BUT significant injuries can be missed No physical signs ≠ exclude intra-abdominal injury 7.1% pts with normal physical examination = intra-

abdominal injuries on CT

Multiple small studies suggest normal examination excludes the need for therapeutic surgery

Page 10: Paediatric Abdominal Trauma

Plain X-Rays

• Free Air– Gastric, duodenal bulb & colonic perforation– Only 25-33% of jejunal & ileal perforations have FA– Better viewed on CT

• Foreign Bodies

• Projectory Paths

Page 11: Paediatric Abdominal Trauma

FAST

• Advantages:– Rapid ID of Intraperitoneal Haemorrhage– Non Invasive– Portable – Rapid (5min FAST)– Widespread (US) therefore not rely on

Radiologists– Serial examinations possible– No side effects

Page 12: Paediatric Abdominal Trauma

FAST

• Disadvantages:– Not able to image extent of organ damage– Not able to visualise retroperitoneum– Operator dependant– Patient dependent– Can’t differentiate blood from ascites– Can’t pick up contained bleeding

Page 13: Paediatric Abdominal Trauma

FAST in ABDO Trauma

• Most studies: – sensitivity for haemoperitonium 86-89%– Depends on required end point (Intra-abdominal

Injury / Intra-abdominal Injury requiring ø / Potentially Fatal intra-abdominal Injury)

• Ollerton et al: U/S & Trauma Management– Changed Mx decisions 32.8% of time– ↓ CT (4734%) & ↓ DPL (91%)

• Branay et al: U/S key pathway– ↓CT (5626%) & ↓DPL (17-4%)

Page 14: Paediatric Abdominal Trauma

FAST: Reliability in Kids:• Holmes: 224 kids (mean age 9 yrs)

– Prospective– Hypotension (13): 100% sens, 100% spec– All Patients (244): 82% sens, 95% spec

• Soudack: 313 kids (2months – 17yrs)– Retrospective– 275 Negative FASTs– 73 of Negative FASTs had abdominal signs & CTs:

• 3 Positive – Parenchymal Injuries, none requiring ø– 92.5% sens, 97.% spec

Page 15: Paediatric Abdominal Trauma

CT Scan• Advantages

– Define extent of injury & organ involvement– Non Invasive– Most Accurate S/I for Solid Organ injury– Evaluates retroperitoneum

• 3 Contrast Studies have 97% sens, 98% spec• Velmahos et al achieved similar rates with IVI

contrast alone.

Page 16: Paediatric Abdominal Trauma

CT Scan

• Disadvantages– Time consuming & unable to monitor patients– Requires IVI Contrast– Requires Sedation in most kids– Can’t visualise pancreas, diaphragm, small bowel

or mesentery– Radiation Dose – Brenner et al

1 yr old child: lethal malignancy risk of 1 abdominal CT was ± 1 in 550

Page 17: Paediatric Abdominal Trauma

CT Scan in Kids

• High Sensitivity & Specificity for the solid organ pattern common in kids

• Radiation dose and need for sedation major drawback in kids, so CT scans should be considered not just ordered as ‘routine’

Page 18: Paediatric Abdominal Trauma

DPL Rapidly reveals/excludes the abdomen as the source

of hypotension Advantages

May detect Bowel Injury (GIT matter) Disadvantages

Invasive with complication rate of 0.3%Operator dependantComparatively time consuming (vs. FAST)

Widespread replacement by FAST

Page 19: Paediatric Abdominal Trauma

Other Diagnostic Modalities

• Local Wound Exploration:– Bedside surgical exploration of tract– Determine whether Peritoneal Violation has taken

place– Patient Factors

• Contrast Studies• Angiography• ERCP• Laparoscopy

Page 20: Paediatric Abdominal Trauma

Management Questions:Blunt Abdominal Trauma

– Trauma vs. Medical component– Single vs. Multisystem trauma– Emergency Laparotomy vs. Dx workup– Single vs. Multiple Intraperitoneal Injury– Expectant vs. Necessary Laparotomy

Paediatric patients tolerate expectant management better than adults.

If paediatric patient is stable and adequate monitoring is available: normally follow expectant management.

Page 21: Paediatric Abdominal Trauma
Page 22: Paediatric Abdominal Trauma
Page 23: Paediatric Abdominal Trauma

Management Questions:Penetrating Trauma

• Trauma vs. Medical component• Single vs. Multisystem trauma• Emergency Laparotomy required?• Peritoneal Violation?• Intraperitoneal Injury?

Stab Wounds – 70% have peritoneal violation but only 25-33% of those require surgery.

Expectant: Shaftan 1960’s

Page 24: Paediatric Abdominal Trauma
Page 25: Paediatric Abdominal Trauma
Page 26: Paediatric Abdominal Trauma
Page 27: Paediatric Abdominal Trauma

Operative vs. Non-operative Management.

Successful: mod – high grade liver / spleen trauma Failures considerable morbidity / mortality Balance between avoiding unnecessary

laparotomy & preventing significant morbidity or mortality by waiting too long.

Requirements: Patient – alert & co-operative, mild-mod MOAInstitution - experienced nursing staff, trauma surgeons,

radiologists & facilities for urgent laparotomy

Page 28: Paediatric Abdominal Trauma

• Pitfalls:1) Hollow Viscera Injuries: missed2) Increased use of blood products 3) Approach will fail if haemorrhage ≠ respond to Rx

angiography + embolization or not abate from solid organs.

Time from injury operation: increase morbidity and mortality.

Page 29: Paediatric Abdominal Trauma

Resources: Advances in Abdominal Trauma; J.L . Isenhour, MD, J

Marx, MD; Emerg Med Clin N Am 25 (2007) 713–733 Pediatric Major Trauma: An Approach to Evaluation and

Management; J.T. Avarello, MD, FAAP, R.M. Cantor, MD, FAAP, FACEP; Emerg Med Clin N Am 25 (2007) 803–836

Rosen’s Emergency Medicine Emergency Medicine Manual, 6th Ed; O.John Ma &

Davis M Kline Oxford Handbook of Trauma for Southern Africa; A

Nicol & E Steyn