17
pad design present understanding Tel Aviv University HEP Experimental Group Ronen Ingbir Collaboration High precision design Tel-Aviv Sep.05 1

Pad design present understanding Tel Aviv University HEP Experimental Group Ronen Ingbir Collaboration High precision design Tel-Aviv Sep.05 1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Pad design present understanding Tel Aviv University HEP Experimental Group Ronen Ingbir Collaboration High precision design Tel-Aviv Sep.05 1

pad design present understanding

Tel Aviv University HEP Experimental Group

Ronen Ingbir

CollaborationHigh precision design Tel-Aviv Sep.051

Page 2: Pad design present understanding Tel Aviv University HEP Experimental Group Ronen Ingbir Collaboration High precision design Tel-Aviv Sep.05 1

High statistics MC, Fast simulationDesign optimization (GEANT) :

1. Granularity and reconstruction algorithm (Log. Weighting).

2. Electronics channels (Maximum peak shower design).

Present understanding design (head on ILC, Crossing angle).

Method of counting Bhabha events

Summary

CollaborationHigh precision design Tel-Aviv Sep.052

Outline

Page 3: Pad design present understanding Tel Aviv University HEP Experimental Group Ronen Ingbir Collaboration High precision design Tel-Aviv Sep.05 1

Fast Detector SimulationMotivation :

High statistics is required to notice precision of : 410L

L

There is an analytic calculation (and approximation) :

(Which is the precision goal of the ILC)

*2

L

L

Luminosity precision determination :

N1 : Reconstructed and generated in acceptance region.

N2 : Generated in acceptance region but reconstructed outside.

N3 : Generated outside acceptance region but reconstructed inside.

21

23

NN

NN

L

L

CollaborationHigh precision design 3 Tel-Aviv Sep.05

Page 4: Pad design present understanding Tel Aviv University HEP Experimental Group Ronen Ingbir Collaboration High precision design Tel-Aviv Sep.05 1

High Statistics Simulation

BHWIDE generated properties + smearing to simulate detector

min

*2

L

L

Changing the bias with a fixed resolution.

CollaborationHigh precision design 4 Tel-Aviv Sep.05

Page 5: Pad design present understanding Tel Aviv University HEP Experimental Group Ronen Ingbir Collaboration High precision design Tel-Aviv Sep.05 1

High Statistics Simulation

Changing the detector resolution with no bias

CollaborationHigh precision design 5 Tel-Aviv Sep.05

Page 6: Pad design present understanding Tel Aviv University HEP Experimental Group Ronen Ingbir Collaboration High precision design Tel-Aviv Sep.05 1

Data and MCIn real life we can include the detector performance (which is measured in test beam) into MC. The only question is: How well should we know the detector performance ?

CollaborationHigh precision design 6 Tel-Aviv Sep.05

Page 7: Pad design present understanding Tel Aviv University HEP Experimental Group Ronen Ingbir Collaboration High precision design Tel-Aviv Sep.05 1

Logarithmic Weighting

CollaborationHigh precision design 7 Tel-Aviv Sep.05

)]}ln()([,0max{T

ibeami E

EEconstW )]}ln()([,0max{

T

icelli E

EEconstW

Page 8: Pad design present understanding Tel Aviv University HEP Experimental Group Ronen Ingbir Collaboration High precision design Tel-Aviv Sep.05 1

Granularity in theta, GEANT results

Resolution Bias

CollaborationHigh precision design 8 Tel-Aviv Sep.05

Page 9: Pad design present understanding Tel Aviv University HEP Experimental Group Ronen Ingbir Collaboration High precision design Tel-Aviv Sep.05 1

Our basic detector is designed with

30 rings * 24 sectors * 15 cylinders = 10,800 channels

Do we use these channels in the most effective way?

Maximum Peak Shower Design

30 rings 15 cylinders

20 cylinders

10 cylinders

24 sectors * 15 rings * (10 cylinders + 20 cylinders) = 10,800 channels

4 rings 15 rings 11 rings

10 cylinders

CollaborationHigh precision design 9 Tel-Aviv Sep.05

Page 10: Pad design present understanding Tel Aviv University HEP Experimental Group Ronen Ingbir Collaboration High precision design Tel-Aviv Sep.05 1

Maximum peak shower design

Basic Design

Angular resolution improvement

without changing the number of

channels

Other properties remain the same

Polar Reconstruction

0.11e-3 rad0.13e-3 rad

CollaborationHigh precision design 10 Tel-Aviv Sep.05

Page 11: Pad design present understanding Tel Aviv University HEP Experimental Group Ronen Ingbir Collaboration High precision design Tel-Aviv Sep.05 1

Present Understanding (pad option)

15 layers

(z)

11 layers

(z)

4 layers

(z)

10 cylinders (θ)

60 cylinders (θ)

CollaborationHigh precision design

Based on optimizing theta measurement

14

Cylinders

)mrad(

11 Tel-Aviv Sep.05

Page 12: Pad design present understanding Tel Aviv University HEP Experimental Group Ronen Ingbir Collaboration High precision design Tel-Aviv Sep.05 1

X- angle background

CollaborationHigh precision design

Christian Grah, DESY-Zuethen

Beamstrahlung pair background

0.E+00

1.E+09

2.E+09

3.E+09

4.E+09

5.E+09

6.E+09

8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

R min (cm)

Num

ber

of B

habh

a ev

ets

per

year

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

Bac

kgro

und

(GeV

)

Events per year

Background (GeV)

250 GeV

12 Tel-Aviv Sep.05

Page 13: Pad design present understanding Tel Aviv University HEP Experimental Group Ronen Ingbir Collaboration High precision design Tel-Aviv Sep.05 1

Method of counting events

CollaborationHigh precision design 13 Tel-Aviv Sep.05

Applying tight acceptance cut on one detector arm.

Count events which satisfy the back to back requirement using a band cut.

Maximum peak shower design and logarithmic weighting : working with a constant (Beam energy and cells size dependents) + applying differential weighting between the parts.

Applying a looser acceptance cut on the second detector arm.

Repeat method for the other side of the detector and compare results.

Page 14: Pad design present understanding Tel Aviv University HEP Experimental Group Ronen Ingbir Collaboration High precision design Tel-Aviv Sep.05 1

Tight cut

Out

In

)(rad

Eout-EinEout+EinP=

3 cylinders

2 cylinders

1 cylinders

CollaborationHigh precision design 14 Tel-Aviv Sep.05

Page 15: Pad design present understanding Tel Aviv University HEP Experimental Group Ronen Ingbir Collaboration High precision design Tel-Aviv Sep.05 1

Forward-Backward Balance RL

Simulation distribution

Distribution after acceptance and energy balance selection

Right side PH

Lef

t si

de

PH

Right PH - Left PH

CollaborationHigh precision design

deg5

rad310

15 Tel-Aviv Sep.05

Page 16: Pad design present understanding Tel Aviv University HEP Experimental Group Ronen Ingbir Collaboration High precision design Tel-Aviv Sep.05 1

Performance of present configuration

CollaborationHigh precision design

ParameterPad Performance

Energy resolution25%

resolution3.5 * 10-5 (rad)

resolution0.63 (deg)

~ 1.5 * 10-6 (rad)

Electronics channels

25,200

~19,000 (X-angle)

410/ LLWith this performance thegoal can be reached.

16 Tel-Aviv Sep.05

Page 17: Pad design present understanding Tel Aviv University HEP Experimental Group Ronen Ingbir Collaboration High precision design Tel-Aviv Sep.05 1

Next (and immediate) steps

CollaborationHigh precision design 17 Tel-Aviv Sep.05

Taking the present understanding design as a basis design for future simulation.

Understanding the criteria for identifying and selecting Bhabha event (maybe better detector resolutions are necessary).

Testing the crossing angle recommendation design in a crossing angle Bhabha scattering simulation which includes serpentine magnetic field.