46
1 p t correlations versus relative azimuth of D- Dbar pairs as a sensitive probe for thermalization Tsiledakis Georgios University of Heidelberg 417 th WE-Heraeus-Seminar, June 25 - 28 2008, Bad Honnef

p t correlations versus relative azimuth of D-Dbar pairs as a sensitive probe for thermalization

  • Upload
    ham

  • View
    37

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

p t correlations versus relative azimuth of D-Dbar pairs as a sensitive probe for thermalization. Tsiledakis Georgios University of Heidelberg. 417 th WE-Heraeus-Seminar,June 25 - 28 2008, Bad Honnef. Outline. Introduction - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: p t  correlations versus relative azimuth of D-Dbar pairs as a sensitive probe for thermalization

1

pt correlations versus relative azimuth of D-Dbar pairs as a

sensitive probe for thermalization

Tsiledakis Georgios

University of Heidelberg

417th WE-Heraeus-Seminar, June 25 - 28 2008, Bad Honnef

Page 2: p t  correlations versus relative azimuth of D-Dbar pairs as a sensitive probe for thermalization

2

Outline• Introduction

• Primordial c-cbar (D-Dbar) correlations for p-p collisions at 14 TeV

• The Average Momentum Correlator

• Contribution of transverse radial/elliptic flow

• Primordial B-Bbar pt correlations

• Charm Production in ALICE

• D-e pt correlations

• e+ - e- pt correlations from D, B decays

• Conclusions

Page 3: p t  correlations versus relative azimuth of D-Dbar pairs as a sensitive probe for thermalization

3

Introduction

Total quark mass (MeV)

X. Zhu, M. Bleicher, K.Schweda, H. Stoecker, N. Xu et al., PLB 647 (2007) 366.

1) Higgs mass: electro-weak symmetry breaking. (current quark mass)

2) QCD mass: Chiral symmetry breaking. (constituent quark mass)

Strong interactions do not

affect heavy-quark masses.

Important tool for studying properties of the hot/dense medium at RHIC and LHC.

Test pQCD predictions at RHIC and LHC.

Page 4: p t  correlations versus relative azimuth of D-Dbar pairs as a sensitive probe for thermalization

4

Low Energy D-Dbar Meson Pair Correlations

(D-Dbar)

= (D) – (Dbar)

• E791 : Eur. Phys. J. direct C1 (1999) 4• WA92 : Phys. Lett. B385 (1996) 487• NA32 : PLB257 (1991) 519 , PLB302 (1993) 112, PLB353 (1995) 547

Correlation variable studied:

103 /

N *

dN

/d(

)

•At low energies, D-Dbar production correlated!

•Pythia describes these correlations!

How about LHC energies?

For many more details, see:

C. Lourenço & H. K. Wöhri,

Phys. Rep. 433 (2006) 127.

D

Dbar

Page 5: p t  correlations versus relative azimuth of D-Dbar pairs as a sensitive probe for thermalization

5

Charm correlations at LHC In p+p:

c-cbar are correlated

• Flavor creation: back to

back

• Gluon splitting: forward

• Flavor excitation: flat

In Pb+Pb:

Correlations vanish

frequent interactions

among partons !

probe light-quark

thermalization !

Page 6: p t  correlations versus relative azimuth of D-Dbar pairs as a sensitive probe for thermalization

6

PYTHIA Settings

• PYTHIA (v.6_406)

• 500000 p-p events at √s = 14 TeV

• 1 pair c-cbar/event

• no tracking, 100 % efficiency

• No rapidity cut

• Fragmentation Pv = 0.75 (default)

p

p c

c D

D

ALICE PPR vol. II, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 32 (2006) 1295-2040

Page 7: p t  correlations versus relative azimuth of D-Dbar pairs as a sensitive probe for thermalization

7

D+ D*+ D0 D*0 Ds+ D*s+

Primordial D –no decay

Fragmentation of charm quarks into D mesonsC

ou

nts

PID

N(D0) : N(D+) : N(D*0) : N(D*+) = 1 : 1 : 3 : 3

c-cbar D0 + D0bar (61 %)

D+ + D- (19 %)

Ds+ + Ds

- (12 %)

c+ + c

-bar (8 %)

Large fraction of c goes to

D0 mesons

Measure D0-D0bar correlations!

Page 8: p t  correlations versus relative azimuth of D-Dbar pairs as a sensitive probe for thermalization

8

Primordial D-Dbar angular correlations

FC away side correlation FE + GS flat Rather weak dependence

No pt cut

Enhanced correlations FC back to back GS forward FE flat Strong pt dependence

Correlations sensitive to pt regionStudy pt correlations versus(DDbar)

Azimuthal correlations survive fragmentation

Page 9: p t  correlations versus relative azimuth of D-Dbar pairs as a sensitive probe for thermalization

9

pt (GeV/c)

0

tt

p

0

tt

t

dpdpdn

dpdpdn

px

t

''

''

x(p

t)

Inclusive pt distribution

D

Cumulant pt variable x

Primordial D-Dbar pt correlations

•Incl. pt-distr. Cumulant x(pt) •2-dim plot (x(pt)1, x(pt)2) for D-Dbar respectively•Is uniform when no correlations are present

Page 10: p t  correlations versus relative azimuth of D-Dbar pairs as a sensitive probe for thermalization

10

D-Dbar pt correlations – at full

pt correlations are dominated

by large pt effects (along the diagonal

at xx)

Same event

Mixed event

Page 11: p t  correlations versus relative azimuth of D-Dbar pairs as a sensitive probe for thermalization

11

D-Dbar pt correlations – angular dependence

Gluon Spitting

Flavor Creation

Page 12: p t  correlations versus relative azimuth of D-Dbar pairs as a sensitive probe for thermalization

12

Measurement of pT Fluctuations using the Average Momentum Correlator

• To quantify dynamical pT fluctuations

– We define the quantity <pt,1pt,2>.

– It is a covariance and an integral of 2-body correlations.

– It equals zero in the absence of dynamical fluctuations

– Defined to be positive for correlation and negative for anti-correlation.

S. Voloshin. V. Koch. H. Ritter, PRC60 (1999)

/ 2/ 2

Ck pt ,i pt pt , j pt j1,ij

Nk

i1

Nk

and pt pt k

k1

Nevent

/ Nevent and pt k pt ,i

i1

Nk

/ Nk

Nevent = number of events

pt i = average pt for i th event

Nk = number of tracks for k th event

pt ,i = pt for i th track in event

where

pt,i for Dpt,j for DbarNk=1

))((1

,,

111

2,1,

tjttit

N

j

N

i

N

kpairstt pppp

Npp

kkevents

Page 13: p t  correlations versus relative azimuth of D-Dbar pairs as a sensitive probe for thermalization

13

Average Momentum Correlator - same event analysis

pt (DDbar)~30 GeV/c

At full : <pt,1pt,2> = 0.1995 +/- 0.006 (GeV/c)2

or pt~30 %

Co

un

ts

CERES at SPS has measured ~1% fluctuations for charged particles

<pt,1pt,2> = 22.71+/- 0.32 (MeV/c)2

Ck pt ,i pt pt , j pt j1,ij

Nk

i1

Nk

(GeV/c)2

Page 14: p t  correlations versus relative azimuth of D-Dbar pairs as a sensitive probe for thermalization

14

Average Momentum Correlator – angular dependence

Enhanced correlations

Only FC produces correlations

at Distinction of the baseline at

middle – flat to 0

Average Momentum Correlator

is a sensitive measure of

back to back correlations

Signal

Background

At full : <pt,1pt,2> ~ 0.20 (GeV/c)2

or pt~30 %

Page 15: p t  correlations versus relative azimuth of D-Dbar pairs as a sensitive probe for thermalization

15

Transverse radial flow contribution

ptD

ptDbarptD

ptDbar

ptf = m

= 0, 0.3, 0.6, 0.9

E. Cuautle and G. Paic hep-ph/0604246 v2 24 May 2006

Assume a fireball created in a coll. from PYTHIA

Expansion produces additional momentum ptf

Attribute to each pt a randomized position

Add the radial flow component vectorially

pt (GeV/c)

Co

un

ts

Page 16: p t  correlations versus relative azimuth of D-Dbar pairs as a sensitive probe for thermalization

16

Transverse radial flow contribution on <pt,1pt,2>

Radial flow: = 0, 0.3, 0.6, 0.9

Stronger flow introduces

anti-correlations around = 180o

10000 events for = 0.3, 0.6, 0.9

500k events for = 0

D

Dbar

D

Dbarff

Page 17: p t  correlations versus relative azimuth of D-Dbar pairs as a sensitive probe for thermalization

17

Elliptic flow contribution

k

k

N

ji

ji

jitjttit

N

jitt

f

fpppp

pp,

,,,

2,1,

))((

)]2cos(21 22

vB

d

dN

We evaluate the elliptic flow expressed in units of (GeV/c)2

•We introduce the measure fi,j

•We calculate the average momentum correlator forDDbar pairs that have flow 10% and 90%

Introduces a cos(2) modulation

|))()(|2cos()()(21 ,2,2, jipvpvf jtitji

Page 18: p t  correlations versus relative azimuth of D-Dbar pairs as a sensitive probe for thermalization

18

realistic amount of elliptic flow

does not change correlations !

Elliptic flow contribution on <pt,1pt,2>

Page 19: p t  correlations versus relative azimuth of D-Dbar pairs as a sensitive probe for thermalization

19

Full rapidity (500000 events)

Mid-rapidity (200000 events)

Primordial D-Dbar angular correlationsat mid-rapidity

• NLO dominant at LHC

• Weak D-Dbar correlation in

• Measurement of medium modification of

this correlation in heavy ion collisions is

challenging

FC away side correlation FE flat in GS forward

Use of pt correlator

Page 20: p t  correlations versus relative azimuth of D-Dbar pairs as a sensitive probe for thermalization

20

Average Momentum Correlator for D-Dbar at mid-rapidity

At full : <pt,1pt,2> = 0.549+/-0.017 (GeV/c)2

or pt~40 %

Stronger signal at mid-rapidity

Full rapidity (500000 events)

Mid-rapidity (200000 events)

Page 21: p t  correlations versus relative azimuth of D-Dbar pairs as a sensitive probe for thermalization

21

Charm Production in ALICE using D0 K-+

ALICE has a barrel system with high precision

vertexing, PID and electron identification (|| < 0.9)

and a forward muon spectrometer (: 2.5–4.0),

down to low pt.

Charm production can be studied:

• In the electronic and muonic channels D eX (X) •In several hadronic decay channels: D0 K , D± K D0 K, Ds KK, Ds

D* D0, c pK ALICE PPR II, J. Phys. 32 (2006) 1295

TPC: main tracking device

ITS: high spatial resolution

TRD: good electron PID (high pion rejection)

ToF: extend PID to large pt

109 p-p events

Nccbar/event = 0.16 (PPR2)

c-cbar D0 (61 %)

D0 (4 %)

Eff.(acceptance, reconstruction,

selection eff.) ~ 0.005

S/B ~ 10%

#Events with both D0-D0bar < 10

Looking at semileptonic decays

Page 22: p t  correlations versus relative azimuth of D-Dbar pairs as a sensitive probe for thermalization

22

Charmed e+/e- correlationsp

t D (

GeV

/c)

pt e- (GeV/c)

De-

•Study e+/e- pt correlations

at the electronic channel D e + X

•BR ~ 15% from D+/-, ~7% from D0

•At low pt the correlation is lost (< 0.5 GeV/c)

•At pt > 1 GeV/c survives

•Need to apply a pt cut:

10% e with pt > 1 GeV/c

1% e with pt > 2 GeV/c

•To account the BG from Dalitz,

conversions, B semileptonic

decays…

Page 23: p t  correlations versus relative azimuth of D-Dbar pairs as a sensitive probe for thermalization

23

Angular correlation of D-e from D e + X

No pt cut

pt > 1 GeV/c

No pt cut

pt > 1 GeV/c

Semileptonic-decay e are strongly pt

correlated with parent D

e+/e- from D-Dbar decay preserve the

original D-Dbar angular correlation to a

large extent

Page 24: p t  correlations versus relative azimuth of D-Dbar pairs as a sensitive probe for thermalization

24

D-e pt correlation

K<—D0<—D*—c – c— D*—> D0—>e- + X

Full rapidity

Mid-rapidity

No pt cut

D-e pt correlations survive charm decay

Page 25: p t  correlations versus relative azimuth of D-Dbar pairs as a sensitive probe for thermalization

25

Charmed e+/e- pt correlations

Full rapidity

Mid-rapidity

Mid-rapidity with pt > 0.5 GeV/c

Mid-rapidity with pt > 1 GeV/c

e+ - e- pt correlations at pt > 1 GeV/c survive charm decay

e+ + X<—D0<—D*—c – c— D*—> D0—>e- + X

Page 26: p t  correlations versus relative azimuth of D-Dbar pairs as a sensitive probe for thermalization

26

PYTHIA processes for charm/beauty generation

Fra

cti

on

of

each

pro

cess

/All

pro

cess

es

f + f’ f + f’

g + g f + fbar

f + g f + g

g + g g + g

•GS dominant for D-Dbar

•FC dominant for B-Bbar

•FE is flat

D-Dbar

B-Bbar

pt (GeV/c)

Page 27: p t  correlations versus relative azimuth of D-Dbar pairs as a sensitive probe for thermalization

27

Primordial B-Bbar angular correlations

•At full : <pt,1pt,2> = 2.97 +/- 0.18

(GeV/c)2 or pt~55 %

•GS flat in dN/d but strong in small

using the Average Momentum Correlator

•FC back to back

•The Average Momentum Correlator is

very sensitive to different PYTHIA

processes for beauty generation

Page 28: p t  correlations versus relative azimuth of D-Dbar pairs as a sensitive probe for thermalization

28

e+/e- correlations from B decays

pt e- (GeV/c)

pt > 1 GeV/c

e+/e- from B decays are strongly pt

correlated at small and large

Need to study background BDe

pt B

(G

eV/c

)

e+ + X<—B0<—B*—c – c— B*—> B0—>e- + X

Page 29: p t  correlations versus relative azimuth of D-Dbar pairs as a sensitive probe for thermalization

29

Conclusions

In p+p, heavy q-qbar production is correlated

The Average Momentum Correlator is a sensitive measure

Correlations survive hadronization

e+- e- pt correlations at pt > 1GeV/c survive charm/beauty decay

need TRD for electron ID!

need full simulations within ALICE

study changes in correlations and address light quark

thermalization at LHC

e<—D0<—D*—c – c— D*—> D0—>e-

<pt,1pt,2> ~ 0.2 (GeV/c)2 for D-Dbar

Page 30: p t  correlations versus relative azimuth of D-Dbar pairs as a sensitive probe for thermalization

30

Backup slides

Page 31: p t  correlations versus relative azimuth of D-Dbar pairs as a sensitive probe for thermalization

31

Measure of mean pT fluctuations

T

dynp

dynpp pT

TT

||sgn

2,2

,

N

pM T

pdynp TT

222

,

• Normalized dynamical fluctuation

222TTT ppp

MpT : variance of MpT dist.

p2T : variance of inclusive pT dist.

<N> : mean multiplicity

pT : inclusive (event-averaged) mean pT

= 0 for purely statistical fluctuation > 0(< 0) with positive/negative two-

particle correlation or dynamical EbyE fluctuation

pT

Dimensionless measure

TTT ppp FΣN 2

Proportional to mean covarianceof all particle pairs / eventRobust under change of multiplicity due to changes in beam energy and acceptance

Page 32: p t  correlations versus relative azimuth of D-Dbar pairs as a sensitive probe for thermalization

32

c-cbar angular correlations

PYTHIA production

No pt cut

Away side correlation

= (c) – (cbar)

Page 33: p t  correlations versus relative azimuth of D-Dbar pairs as a sensitive probe for thermalization

33

D-Dbar pt correlations - Mixed event analysis

Full

Uniform populated – no correlations

Page 34: p t  correlations versus relative azimuth of D-Dbar pairs as a sensitive probe for thermalization

34

Gluon splitting

Full

D-Dbar pt correlations - Same event analysis

High pT correlations at small

Page 35: p t  correlations versus relative azimuth of D-Dbar pairs as a sensitive probe for thermalization

35

Flavor excitation

Full

D-Dbar pt correlations - Same event analysis

Rather flat

Page 36: p t  correlations versus relative azimuth of D-Dbar pairs as a sensitive probe for thermalization

36

Pair creation

Full

D-Dbar pt correlations - Same event analysis

High pT correlations at big

Page 37: p t  correlations versus relative azimuth of D-Dbar pairs as a sensitive probe for thermalization

37

Average Momentum Correlator for same/mixed events

Ck pt ,i pt pt , j pt j1,ij

Nk

i1

Nk

Ck pt ,i pt pt , j pt j1,ij

Nk

i1

Nk

Mixed events

Same events

GeV2

GeV2

Co

un

ts

Co

un

ts

Ck pt ,i pt pt , j pt j1,ij

Nk

i1

Nk

Page 38: p t  correlations versus relative azimuth of D-Dbar pairs as a sensitive probe for thermalization

38

Correlation strength for primordial D0 and D0 from D*

Generate D0, D+/-, Ds (no resonances)

with Pv=1 (0.75 default)

Generate D* (only resonances) with

Pv=0 and decay them…

correlations survive resonance decay

50000

Page 39: p t  correlations versus relative azimuth of D-Dbar pairs as a sensitive probe for thermalization

39

No flow10% elliptic flow90% elliptic flow

Elliptic flow contribution on dN/d

Page 40: p t  correlations versus relative azimuth of D-Dbar pairs as a sensitive probe for thermalization

40

Radial flow contribution on dN/d

= 0, 0.3, 0.6, 0.8, 0.9

With increasing near-side/away-side peaks are enhanced

10000

Page 41: p t  correlations versus relative azimuth of D-Dbar pairs as a sensitive probe for thermalization

41

Charm Production in ALICEALICE has a barrel system with high precision

vertexing, PID and electron identification (|| < 0.9)

and a forward muon spectrometer (: 2.5–4.0),

down to low pT.

Charm production can be studied:

• In the electronic and muonic channels D eX (X) •In several hadronic decay channels: D0 K , D± K D0 K, Ds KK, Ds

D* D0, c pK

ALICE PPR II, J. Phys. 32 (2006) 1295

D0 K-+ the cleanest channel

• pair of opposite-charge tracks with large impact parameters• good pointing of reconstructed D0 momentum to the primary vertex

TPC: main tracking device

ITS: high spatial resolution

TRD: good electron PID (high pion rejection)

ToF: extend PID to large pT

Page 42: p t  correlations versus relative azimuth of D-Dbar pairs as a sensitive probe for thermalization

42

Full rapidity (500000 events)

Mid-rapidity (200000 events)

pt for D-Dbar at full and mid-rapidity

Page 43: p t  correlations versus relative azimuth of D-Dbar pairs as a sensitive probe for thermalization

43Mid-rapidity (200000 events)

Full rapidity (100000 events)

Fra

ctio

n o

f ea

ch p

roce

ss/A

ll p

roce

sses

pt (GeV/c)

Page 44: p t  correlations versus relative azimuth of D-Dbar pairs as a sensitive probe for thermalization

44

Number of charmed electrons 109 p-p events

Nccbar/event = 0.16 (PPR2)

c-cbar D0 (61%)

c-cbar D+/- (20%)

D e + X (15% from D+/-, 7% from D0)

10% e with pt > 1 GeV/c

#events with e+/e- from D0 = 0.16*0.612*0.072*109 ~ 300000At pt > 1 GeV = 3000

#events with e+/e- from D+/- = 0.16*0.202*0.152*109 ~ 144000At pt > 1 GeV = 1440

~ 4500 clean e+/e- pairs with pt > 1 GeV at full rapidity

Page 45: p t  correlations versus relative azimuth of D-Dbar pairs as a sensitive probe for thermalization

45

e+ - e-

D-e

Page 46: p t  correlations versus relative azimuth of D-Dbar pairs as a sensitive probe for thermalization

46

D-Dbar

B-Bbar

At full : <pt,1pt,2> = 2.97 +/- 0.18 (GeV/c)2

or pt~55 %

At full : <pt,1pt,2> = 0.2 +/- 0.006 (GeV/c)2

or pt~30 %

Co

un

tsC

ou

nts

Ck pt ,i pt pt , j pt j1,ij

Nk

i1

Nk

Ck pt ,i pt pt , j pt j1,ij

Nk

i1

Nk

(GeV/c)2

(GeV/c)2