35
P. M. Grant 17 November 1998 The Energy-Environment Problem and Superconductivity Technology The Energy-Environment Problem and Superconductivity Technology Paul M. Grant

P. M. Grant 17 November 1998 The Energy-Environment Problem and Superconductivity Technology Paul M. Grant

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: P. M. Grant 17 November 1998 The Energy-Environment Problem and Superconductivity Technology Paul M. Grant

P. M. Grant 17 November 1998

The Energy-Environment Problem and Superconductivity Technology

The Energy-Environment Problem and

Superconductivity TechnologyPaul M. Grant

Page 2: P. M. Grant 17 November 1998 The Energy-Environment Problem and Superconductivity Technology Paul M. Grant

P. M. Grant 17 November 1998

The Energy-Environment Problem and Superconductivity Technology

Mega-Cities

Page 3: P. M. Grant 17 November 1998 The Energy-Environment Problem and Superconductivity Technology Paul M. Grant

P. M. Grant 17 November 1998

The Energy-Environment Problem and Superconductivity Technology

The “Trilemma”

• Economic Growth

• Energy Consumption

• Conservative & Environment

“…to save the earth andassure the survival of humanity.”

Page 4: P. M. Grant 17 November 1998 The Energy-Environment Problem and Superconductivity Technology Paul M. Grant

P. M. Grant 17 November 1998

The Energy-Environment Problem and Superconductivity Technology

Energy Civilization

Year (Modern Era)

Rel

ativ

e U

nits

Nuclear

Page 5: P. M. Grant 17 November 1998 The Energy-Environment Problem and Superconductivity Technology Paul M. Grant

P. M. Grant 17 November 1998

The Energy-Environment Problem and Superconductivity Technology

Economic Growth &Energy Consumption

Page 6: P. M. Grant 17 November 1998 The Energy-Environment Problem and Superconductivity Technology Paul M. Grant

P. M. Grant 17 November 1998

The Energy-Environment Problem and Superconductivity Technology

Global Energy Consumption

Source: International Energy Outlook: 1998

US Energy Information Agency

Page 7: P. M. Grant 17 November 1998 The Energy-Environment Problem and Superconductivity Technology Paul M. Grant

P. M. Grant 17 November 1998

The Energy-Environment Problem and Superconductivity Technology

Elements of the Trilemma

Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse…Albrecht Duerer

Page 8: P. M. Grant 17 November 1998 The Energy-Environment Problem and Superconductivity Technology Paul M. Grant

P. M. Grant 17 November 1998

The Energy-Environment Problem and Superconductivity Technology

North American Grid

Page 9: P. M. Grant 17 November 1998 The Energy-Environment Problem and Superconductivity Technology Paul M. Grant

P. M. Grant 17 November 1998

The Energy-Environment Problem and Superconductivity Technology

US Energy Flow - 1995

Page 10: P. M. Grant 17 November 1998 The Energy-Environment Problem and Superconductivity Technology Paul M. Grant

P. M. Grant 17 November 1998

The Energy-Environment Problem and Superconductivity Technology

Electricity & Energy Conservation

E/GNP (index: 1900=100) Electricity (%)

E/GNP ratio

Electricityfraction

Source: Electricity in the American Economy, Sam H. Schurr, et al., 1990

1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000

50

40

30

20

10

150

130

110

90

70

50

2010

Page 11: P. M. Grant 17 November 1998 The Energy-Environment Problem and Superconductivity Technology Paul M. Grant

P. M. Grant 17 November 1998

The Energy-Environment Problem and Superconductivity Technology

US Electricity Flow: 1994

1 Quad = 0.29 TkWh

0.28 TkWh

0.15 TkWh

3.24 TkWh

Page 12: P. M. Grant 17 November 1998 The Energy-Environment Problem and Superconductivity Technology Paul M. Grant

P. M. Grant 17 November 1998

The Energy-Environment Problem and Superconductivity Technology

Electricity Paradigmand Superconductivity

• Generation/Storage– Generators, SMES, Flywheels

• Transmission/Distribution– Cables, Transformers, FCLs

• Delivery/End Use– Motors, Electromagnets

Page 13: P. M. Grant 17 November 1998 The Energy-Environment Problem and Superconductivity Technology Paul M. Grant

P. M. Grant 17 November 1998

The Energy-Environment Problem and Superconductivity Technology

Electricity-Transportation Analogy

Electricity Transportation

· Fuel

· Generation

· Natural Resources

· Manufacturing/Agriculture

· Transmission Electrons· Distribution

· Interstate Highways Trucks· Regional Freeways

· End Uses· Lighting· Rotating Machinery· Appliances

· Retail Sales· Home Depot· Sears· Safeway

Page 14: P. M. Grant 17 November 1998 The Energy-Environment Problem and Superconductivity Technology Paul M. Grant

P. M. Grant 17 November 1998

The Energy-Environment Problem and Superconductivity Technology

U.S. ElectricityProduction/Loss Summary

TkWh % in T&D Lossand In-Plant

Use

Revenue@

$0.10/kWh(B$)

No. of 500MW PlantEquivalents

Capital Cost@ $800/kW

(B$)

Total 3.24 324 740 296

T&DLosses

0.28 8% 28 63 25

In-PlantUsed

0.15 5% 15 35 14

Page 15: P. M. Grant 17 November 1998 The Energy-Environment Problem and Superconductivity Technology Paul M. Grant

P. M. Grant 17 November 1998

The Energy-Environment Problem and Superconductivity Technology

Superconductivityand Efficiency

1994 2014@ 2%/yr

2014Plants Saved

0.2%Penetration4× Efficiency

Total 740 360

T&D Losses 63 31 11

In-House Use 35 17 6

Page 16: P. M. Grant 17 November 1998 The Energy-Environment Problem and Superconductivity Technology Paul M. Grant

P. M. Grant 17 November 1998

The Energy-Environment Problem and Superconductivity Technology

North American CH4

There’s Lots of It

3D SeismicImaging PlusDirectionalDrilling

50 Years at‘97 Prices!

EPRI

Natural Gas IndustryNatural Gas IndustryEstimates of Remaining ReservesEstimates of Remaining Reserves

1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000

24002400

20002000

16001600

12001200

800800

400400

00

3D Seismic Imaging3D Seismic Imaging

EPRI

TcfTcf

TrendlineTrendlineGRIPGC

Page 17: P. M. Grant 17 November 1998 The Energy-Environment Problem and Superconductivity Technology Paul M. Grant

P. M. Grant 17 November 1998

The Energy-Environment Problem and Superconductivity Technology

Gas or Electricity?Pipes or Wires?

Page 18: P. M. Grant 17 November 1998 The Energy-Environment Problem and Superconductivity Technology Paul M. Grant

P. M. Grant 17 November 1998

The Energy-Environment Problem and Superconductivity Technology

Distributed Generation

Page 19: P. M. Grant 17 November 1998 The Energy-Environment Problem and Superconductivity Technology Paul M. Grant

P. M. Grant 17 November 1998

The Energy-Environment Problem and Superconductivity Technology

MicroTurbines

Page 20: P. M. Grant 17 November 1998 The Energy-Environment Problem and Superconductivity Technology Paul M. Grant

P. M. Grant 17 November 1998

The Energy-Environment Problem and Superconductivity Technology

MicroTurbines

Page 21: P. M. Grant 17 November 1998 The Energy-Environment Problem and Superconductivity Technology Paul M. Grant

P. M. Grant 17 November 1998

The Energy-Environment Problem and Superconductivity Technology

Distributed Generation:US &Europe

• Use widespread NG pipeline network• Generation plants sited locally

– Community of 60,000: 50-100 MW– Subdivision of 1-2000: 3-5 MW– Single Family Dwelling: 20-30 kW

(100,000 btu/hr)

• Some level of storage required• “Loosely” connected to grid

Page 22: P. M. Grant 17 November 1998 The Energy-Environment Problem and Superconductivity Technology Paul M. Grant

P. M. Grant 17 November 1998

The Energy-Environment Problem and Superconductivity Technology

Renewables

Page 23: P. M. Grant 17 November 1998 The Energy-Environment Problem and Superconductivity Technology Paul M. Grant

P. M. Grant 17 November 1998

The Energy-Environment Problem and Superconductivity Technology

“Fuel-Head” and/orNuclear Generation

Page 24: P. M. Grant 17 November 1998 The Energy-Environment Problem and Superconductivity Technology Paul M. Grant

P. M. Grant 17 November 1998

The Energy-Environment Problem and Superconductivity Technology

Power by HTSC:Southeast Asia

Page 25: P. M. Grant 17 November 1998 The Energy-Environment Problem and Superconductivity Technology Paul M. Grant

P. M. Grant 17 November 1998

The Energy-Environment Problem and Superconductivity Technology

1967 SC Cable !

100 GW dc, 1000 km !

Page 26: P. M. Grant 17 November 1998 The Energy-Environment Problem and Superconductivity Technology Paul M. Grant

P. M. Grant 17 November 1998

The Energy-Environment Problem and Superconductivity Technology

The SuperconductingElectricity Pipe!

I

-V

Ground

Structural Support

SuperconductingElectricityPipeline

ThermalInsulation

ElectricalInsulation

Superconductor(-V)

Superconductor(+V)

+VI

LiquidNitrogen

• Total Cryo System

• Power: 5 GW dc

• Cost: < Gas, HVDC > 500 Miles

Page 27: P. M. Grant 17 November 1998 The Energy-Environment Problem and Superconductivity Technology Paul M. Grant

P. M. Grant 17 November 1998

The Energy-Environment Problem and Superconductivity Technology

Operating Parameters

Capacity 50 kA, ±50 kV; %GMW

Length 1610 km

Temperature Rise,1 K every 10 km, 65 K,1 W/m heat input

21,600 liters LN2/hr,100 kW coolers, 120gal/min

Vacuum 10-5-10-4 torr 10 stations/10 km need200 kW

Page 28: P. M. Grant 17 November 1998 The Energy-Environment Problem and Superconductivity Technology Paul M. Grant

P. M. Grant 17 November 1998

The Energy-Environment Problem and Superconductivity Technology

Gas/HVDC Comparison

Marginal Cost of Electricity (Mid Value Fuel Costs)

0.60

0.80

1.00

1.20

1.40

1.60

1.80

2.00

2.20

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500

Miles

c/k

Wh

LVDC ($5.5/kA-m @ 65K)

LVDC ($10/kA-m @ 77K)

HVDC

gas pipeline

Page 29: P. M. Grant 17 November 1998 The Energy-Environment Problem and Superconductivity Technology Paul M. Grant

P. M. Grant 17 November 1998

The Energy-Environment Problem and Superconductivity Technology

Adaptation

Over 10,000 feared dead andmissing in Nicaragua andHonduras from Hurricane Mitch. Many more withoutshelter.

Page 30: P. M. Grant 17 November 1998 The Energy-Environment Problem and Superconductivity Technology Paul M. Grant

P. M. Grant 17 November 1998

The Energy-Environment Problem and Superconductivity Technology

November 10, 1998THE FIRST BIG SNOWSTORMof the season swept across the northern Plains onTuesday, shutting down a major highway and sending hundreds of cars skidding into ditches. It also spun off thunderstormsthat flattened houses in aMissouri university town.

One person was killed in a car crash in Minnesota,

where up to a foot of snow and 40 mph wind were

expected by Tuesday night.

The storm dumped up to 2 feet of snow in the Colorado Rockies, knocking out power to 10,000 people around Durango, Colo.

Page 31: P. M. Grant 17 November 1998 The Energy-Environment Problem and Superconductivity Technology Paul M. Grant

P. M. Grant 17 November 1998

The Energy-Environment Problem and Superconductivity Technology

The Standard Model

Page 32: P. M. Grant 17 November 1998 The Energy-Environment Problem and Superconductivity Technology Paul M. Grant

P. M. Grant 17 November 1998

The Energy-Environment Problem and Superconductivity Technology

Low Field VHLC Prototype

Page 33: P. M. Grant 17 November 1998 The Energy-Environment Problem and Superconductivity Technology Paul M. Grant

P. M. Grant 17 November 1998

The Energy-Environment Problem and Superconductivity Technology

3 TeV VHLCBooster Siting

~ 150 m

Page 34: P. M. Grant 17 November 1998 The Energy-Environment Problem and Superconductivity Technology Paul M. Grant

P. M. Grant 17 November 1998

The Energy-Environment Problem and Superconductivity Technology

Page 35: P. M. Grant 17 November 1998 The Energy-Environment Problem and Superconductivity Technology Paul M. Grant

P. M. Grant 17 November 1998

The Energy-Environment Problem and Superconductivity Technology

The Future

700 K !

May, 2028