Upload
justin-bishop
View
216
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
P. D. Hien, V. T. Bac, N. T. H. ThinhVietnam Atomic Energy Commission
24h_PM10 Lang-Hanoi
0
150
300
450
Jul-98
Dec-98
May-99
Nov-99
Apr-00
Sep-00
Feb-01
Aug-01
Jan-02
Jun-02
Nov-02
May-03
Oct-03
Mar-04
Aug-04
ug
m-3
24h_PM2.2 Lang-Hanoi
0
100
200
Jul-98
Dec-98
May-99
Nov-99
Apr-00
Sep-00
Feb-01
Aug-01
Jan-02
Jun-02
Nov-02
May-03
Oct-03
Mar-04
Aug-04
ug
m-3
Observations & Approach
• Mean PM10 = 89 gm-3, mean PM2.2 = 37 gm-3
• 24-h PM10 > 150 gm-3 on 70-80 days/year,
• Preliminary source characterization showed mineral dust and long-range transport sulfate are dominant in the coarse and fine fraction,
• Comparative study on urban and rural pollution would provide significant information on properties and sources of coarse and fine PM10,
• For that purpose, coarse and fine PM10 samples were analyzed for elements (Al, Ca, Cl, Fe, K, Mg, Mn, Pb, Si, Ti, V, Zn) by PIXE and water soluble ions (Ca2+, Mg2+, K+, Na+, NH4
+, Cl-, SO42-, NO3
-) by
IC Dionex 600
Hanoi-to-Lucnam concentration ratios
urban/rural ratio
0
1
2
3
4
5
NH4 V Mg
Na+ K Cl
Cl- Si
Al Ti
SO4
K+
Mg+ Fe
NO3
Mn
Mass
Pb
Ca
Ca+ Zn
fine coarse
Urban vs. rural PM10
Coarse mass is 2 times higher in urban But, fine mass is similar, about 31 gm-3
Fine SO4, K, K+, BC are similar
Ca2+ (construction), Pb and Zn (vehicle) are from 3-5 times more abundant in urban,
NH4+ more abundant in rural,
Similar sources of PM10 at two sites
• Coarse: Soil-nitrate, soil-sulphate, distant and local coal fly ash, sea salt, ammonium sulphate,
• Fine: Long-range transport, soil dust, distant and local coal fly ash, Cl-depleted marine aerosols, biomass burning,
But• Vehicle derived dust (coarse and fine)
found only at the urban site.
050100150200
Al
Ca
Ca++ Cl
Cl-Fe K K+
Mg
Mg++
Mn
Na+
NH4+
NO3- Pb Si
SO4- TiV Zn
soil-nitrate Lucnam
0
200
400
600
Al
Ca
Ca++ Cl
Cl-Fe K K+
Mg
Mg++
Mn
Na+
NH4+
NO3- Pb Si
SO4- TiV Zn
soil-sulphate
0200400600800
Al
Ca
Ca++ Cl
Cl-Fe K K+
Mg
Mg++
Mn
Na+
NH4+
NO3- Pb Si
SO4- TiV Zn
distant coal
0
200
400
Al
Ca
Ca++ Cl
Cl-Fe K K+
Mg
Mg++
Mn
Na+
NH4+
NO3- Pb Si
SO4- TiV Zn
local coal
0100200300400
Al
Ca
Ca++ Cl
Cl-Fe K K+
Mg
Mg++
Mn
Na+
NH4+
NO3- Pb Si
SO4- TiV Zn
soil-nitrate Hanoi
0200400600800
Al
Ca
Ca++ Cl
Cl-Fe K K+
Mg
Mg++
Mn
Na+
NH4+
NO3- Pb Si
SO4- TiV Zn
soil-sulphate
0
100
200
300
Al
Ca
Ca++ Cl
Cl-Fe K K+
Mg
Mg++
Mn
Na+
NH4+
NO3- Pb Si
SO4- TiV Zn
distant coal
0200400600800
Al
Ca
Ca++ Cl
Cl-Fe K K+
Mg
Mg++
Mn
Na+
NH4+
NO3- Pb Si
SO4- TiV Zn
local coal
soil-sulphate
31%
soil-nitrate
20%
amm. sulphate
13%
marine12%
road dust8%
local coal8%
distant coal8%
Hanoi, coarse
Lucnam, coarse
soil-sulphate
31.1%
distant coal
22.4%
local coal
13.6%
soil-nitrate9.5%
marine9.3%
ammon. sulphate
14.2%
Findings (coarse)
• Soil-derived dust 3 times more abundant at urban site, • But coal fly ash is little more abundant at rural site,• Common distant coal burning sources affects both sites • Mineral dust (MD) provides sites for nitrate and sulfate
formation by reactions with nitrogen and sulfur gases.• Nitrate bound mainly to Ca-richest soil dust,• Sulfate formed on soil dust (with higher Ca/Si ratio) rather
than coal fly ash,• Coarse ammonium sulfate found on soil organic matter
fraction
LRT Lucnam
0100020003000
BC Al
Ca
Ca++ Cl
Cl-Fe KK+
Mg
Mg++
Mn
Na+
NH4Pb Si
SO4- Ti V
Zn
LRT Hanoi
01000200030004000
BC Al
Ca
Ca++ Cl
Cl-Fe KK+
Mg
Mg++
Mn
Na+
NH4Pb Si
SO4- Ti V
Zn
Cl-depl. marine
0200400600
BC Al
Ca
Ca++ Cl
Cl-Fe KK+
Mg
Mg++
Mn
Na+
NH4Pb Si
SO4- Ti V
Zn
Cl-depl. marine
0200400600
BC Al
Ca
Ca++ Cl
Cl-Fe KK+
Mg
Mg++
Mn
Na+
NH4Pb Si
SO4- Ti V
Zn
soil
0
200
400
BC Al
Ca
Ca++ Cl
Cl-Fe KK+
Mg
Mg++
Mn
Na+
NH4Pb Si
SO4- Ti V
Zn
soil
0
100
200
BC Al
Ca
Ca++ Cl
Cl-Fe KK+
Mg
Mg++
Mn
Na+
NH4Pb Si
SO4- Ti V
Zn
biomass
0300600900
BC Al
Ca
Ca++ Cl
Cl-Fe KK+
Mg
Mg++
Mn
Na+
NH4Pb Si
SO4- Ti V
Zn
biomass
0
200
400BC Al
Ca
Ca++ Cl
Cl-Fe KK+
Mg
Mg++
Mn
Na+
NH4Pb Si
SO4- Ti V
Zn
Lucnam, FM=32 ugm-3
biomass11%
distant coal11%
Cl-depleted
7%
soil dust5%
long-range
transport36%
local coal26%
ammoni. sulphate
4%
long-range transport
36%
local coal11%
soil dust10%
Cl-depleted
10%
vehicle8%
biomass6%
distant coal 19%
Hanoi, fine PM10, FM=31.1 ugm-3
Findings (fine)
• The loadings of LRT aerosols are similar (~11 gm-3) and largest at both sites – Trans-boundary pollution.
• LRT aerosols are soot particles (containing EC and K) incorporating SO4 & NH4 during atmospheric transport of air masses,
• Coal fly ash – largest source at rural and second largest source at Hanoi site,
• Vehicles contribute 3 times less than coal burning at Hanoi and insignificant at rural areas.
• Biomass burning: 2 times weaker in Hanoi.
Implications on AQ management
It is a mistake that air quality in rural areas is not “a matter of concern”. In fact, PM2.5 is not less abundant in rural than urban areas,
Coal fly ash and soil dust are major components of PM10
in northern Vietnam that should be adequately addressed to improve air quality,
• Toxic nitrogen and sulfur gases are absorbed on soil and soot particles and transformed into nitrate and sulfate,
• LRT accounts for ~20% of PM10 mass in both rural and urban areas indicating the importance of transboundary pollition in the region.