Ozamiz Statistics

8/12/2019 Ozamiz Statistics

1/20

Lgu Name: Ozamiz City

DCF Year: 2011-LGPMS

Basic Profile:

LGU Type: CityIncome Class: 3rd

Population: 131,049

Total Land Area (in has): 16,407.00

No. of Barangays: 51

No. of Households: 26,210

Financial Profile:

IRA Share: Php 345,778,800.00

Local-Sourced Revenues: Php 141,401,278.97Other Revenues: Php 270,514.03

Total LGU Income: Php 487,450,593.00

Ecosystems:

Agricultural Ecosystems

Forest Ecosystems

Coastal Marine Ecosystems

Freshwater Ecosystems

Economic Activity:

Rating Name

1 Agricultural

2 Commercial and Service Centers

3 Fishery

4 Industrial

5 Mining

Contact Information:

Name of Mayor or

Governor:HON. NOVA PRINCESS E. PAROJINOG-ECHAVEZ

Telephone Number:

Fax Number: (088) 521 - 1390


2/20

Email Address: [email protected]

Website Address: ozamiz.gov.ph


3/20

e-SLGPRState of Local Governance Performance, Electronic Report

Ozamiz City, PY 2011

Highlighted in this report is your LGU's performance in four (4) areas of governance: (1) Administrative Governance, (2) SocialGovernance, (3) Economic Governance, and (4) Environmental Governance. A special report is included to determine how thefundamentals of good governance such as Participation, Transparency, and Financial Accountability are valued in the LGU. It is to notethat the LGU's performance was assessed based on the responses of the LGU's Team to the questions provided into the LGPMSdatabase. A Performance Scale is used to identify areas with excellent performance and areas for improvement. A perfect scale of 5denotes excellent performance while performance scales of 1-4 indicate areas for improvement. Although scales of 3 and 4 arerelatively high, there are areas which can still be improved on. All these are explained in detail as you read the entire report.

On Administrative Governance

Administrative Governance looks into six areas: Local Legislation, Development Planning, Revenue Generation, ResourceAllocation and Utilization, Customer Service and Human Resource Management and Development. Your LGU performance in each areaof Administrative Governance is plotted in the graph below.

Area(s) with Excellent Performance

Your LGU is doing an excellent performance in 2 out of 6 sub-areas of Administrative Governance. Sustain Performance in thisarea:

Area(s) with ExcellentPerformance

Interpretation

Human ResourceManagement and Development

Managing the human resource is geared towards a desired end which is"desirable organizational performance and productivity".

Customer Service - CivilApplications

Seamless delivery and ease of obtaining frontline services are principal in civilregistry and real property documents.

Area(s) for Improve ment

The areas for improvement are listed by priority, starting from the area which gets the lowest performance scale followed byareas which get higher performance scales, respectively.

Priority Area for Improvement PerformanceDescription

Interpretation

Local Legislation2.75Low

Quality legislation is a hallmark of good local governance. The localgovernment is way off-mark. It bears emphasizing that quality legislation isdesired, deliberate and planned. Accord importance to the building oflegislative staff competence, and the use or the resort to research-basedagenda development, legislative tracking, backstopping committee andlegislative performance.

Priority Area for Improvement PerformanceDescription Interpretation

Revenue Generation4.00High but notExcellent

Existing measures in support of revenue generation need to be enhanced. Thisis an initial yet essential step in maximizing revenue generation potentials.

Priorit Area for Improvement Performance Interpretation


4/20

Description

Development Planning4.09High but notExcellent

Improvements in the following areas are underscored: (a) organizationalperformance; (b) consultation process; and (c) management of planningdatabase. These areas are instrumental in quality land use and developmentplanning, or lack of it.


Interpretation

Resource Allocation and

Utilization

4.50High but not

Excellent

Management and coordination processes for budgeting and accounting are inplace. However, these processes need to be revisited and improved. They are

guarantees to an effective allocation and optimum utilization of financialresources.


5/20




On Economic Governance

Economic Governance looks into three areas: Support to Agriculture Sector, Support to Fishery Services, and Enterprise,Business and Industry Promotion. The report varies according to the nature of economic activities in the locality. Support to agricultureor fishery services are filtered out if not applicable. Your LGU performance in this area is plotted in the graph below.


Your LGU is doing an excellent performance in 1 out of 3 sub-areas of Economic Governance. Sustain Performance in thisarea:

Area(s)with ExcellentPerformance

Interpretation

Supportto FisheryServices

A working FARMC. Funding for the fishery sector is fully provided such as on the rehabilitation orconstruction of fishery-related infrastructure, e.g., mariculture park, fish port, sea cages. Credit, productionsupport, research and development, and market development services are available. Most if not all thefisherfolks benefitted from fishery extension and on-site research services or facilities.




Interpretation

Entrepreneurship, Business andIndustry Promotion

4.17High but notExcellent

More need to be done to institutionalize a business-friendly environment.Factors such as the following need to be looked into:

Suggested Action(s) to Take

Ensure the ease of doing business. Strategize to effect the issuance of building, occupancy, and business permits in a moreexpedient manner


Interpretation

Support to Agriculture Sector4.95High but notExcellent

Local government support is extended to the Agriculture Sector. But greaterintervention is necessary.



6/20

Improve infrastructure support, e.g., communal irrigation system, farm-to-market roads, post-harvest facilities


7/20


8/20


9/20




On Valuing Fundamentals of Governance

This section of the report describes how your LGU values and maintains good governance in the context of Transparency,Participation, and Financial Accountability.


Your LGU is doing an excellent performance in 1 out of 3 sub-areas of Valuing Fundamentals of Governance. SustainPerformance in this area:

Area(s) withExcellent

PerformanceInterpretation

TransparencyTransparency in governmental operations is remarkable. Communicating to the public through

various means, i.e., Bulletin Board, Public Information Office or Desk, print, broadcast media, website,and forum, is valued.




Interpretation

Participation4.33High but notExcellent

Strengthening CSO participation in Local Special Bodies and the CitizenFeedback system, including the maximization of CSO engagement indevelopment projects is a MUST action. There are merits to it. In addition tothe principal of participation, other desirable governance values liketransparency, accountability and consensus-influenced decisions arereinforced.


Interpretation

Financial Accountability4.81High but notExcellent

Efforts to improve financial accountability are acknowledged. However,administrative capacity to ensure observance of guidelines relative toaccounting, internal control, procurement and financial transactions need to bestrengthened.


10/20


11/20




On Environmental Governance

Environmental Governance looks into four areas: Forest Ecosystem Management, Freshwater Ecosystem Management,Coastal Marine Ecosystem Management, and Urban Ecosystem Management. The report varies according to local ecosystems.Ecosystems which are not related to the LGU are filtered out. Your LGU performance in this area is plotted in the graph below.


Your LGU is doing an excellent performance in 3 out of 4 sub-areas of Environmental Governance . Sustain Performance inthis area:

Area(s)with ExcellentPerformance

Interpretation

CoastalMarineEcosystemsManagement

Coastal marine ecosystem management is a core concern of the LGU. Long-term planning ispracticed. CSOs and citizens are engaged in coastal marine protection and rehabilitation. Areas forrehabilitation and protection are set, and that target areas for rehabilitation and protection are met.

FreshwaterEcosystemsManagement

Freshwater ecosystem management is of importance to the LGU. Long-term planning is valued.CSO and citizen participation are recognized and are mobilized in fresh water protection and rehabilitation.Areas for rehabilitation and protection are set, and that target areas for rehabilitation and protection are met.

ForestEcosystemsManagement

Forest ecosystem management is central to the concerns of the LGU. Long-term planning isparamount. CSOs and citizens are mobilized in forest protection. Areas for reforestation and protection areset, and that target areas for reforestation and protection are met.




Interpretation

Urban EcosystemsManagement

4.33

High but notExcellent

Pollution control and proper solid waste management are essential in

preserving the integrity of the environment. More need to be done. To gainbetter performance in this area, consider the following:


Prepare, if none has been formulated, or improve the quality of, the Solid Waste Management PlanEnsure that every barangay has a material recovery facilityMove from Open Dumpsite Facility to Controlled Dumpsite Facility to a Sanitary Landfill as the final disposal facility. It makessense. At the ver least, inaction has le al implications. But more tellin are the health and environmental imperatives


12/20


13/20

Financial Performance e-ReportOzamiz City, PY 2011

Revenue Generation

Interpretation Guide

Indicator:

Cost to Collect Revenues

Computation:

(cost in collecting revenues/total local revenues collected) x 100

Significance: Determines local revenue collection efficiency

Desired performance:

Should be lower than the average of LGUs with the same LGU type and income class

Exceptional performance:

Lower for both conditions: (1)average of LGUs with the same LGU type and income class, (2)nationalaverage of the same LGU type regardless of income class


14/20


15/20

Computation:

[(Locally Sourced Revenues + IRA)/Total LGU Income] x 100

Significance:

Describes reliability of funding sources


Should be higher than the average of LGUs with the same LGU type and income class

Exceptional performance: Should be higher than the: (1)average of LGUs with the same LGU type and income class, (2) national

average of the same LGU type regardless of income class


Indicator:

Locally-Sourced Revenue Level

Computation:

Amount of Locally-Sourced Revenue

Significance:

Describes locally-sourced revenue gap between the LGU and average of LGUs (by LGU type and incomeclass)




Should be higher than the: (1)average of LGUs with the same LGU type and income class, (2) nationalaverage of the same LGU type regardless of income class


16/20


Indicator:

Locally-Sourced Revenue Per Capita

Computation: (amount of locally-sourced revenue/population)

Significance:

Describes locally-sourced revenue per capita gap between your LGU and average of LGUs






Indicator:

Real Property Tax (RPT) Accomplishment Rate

Computation:

(Amount of RPT collected/Amount of projected RPT collectibles) x 100

Significance:

RPT is one of the major sources of income of LGUs in general. This indicator determines local revenuecollection effort on RPT.


17/20





Resourced Allocation and Utilization


Indicator:

Personal Services Expenditure Ratio

Computation:

(Personnel services expenditures/Total expenditures) x 100

Significance:

Determines the biases of the local government unit in terms of budget allocation


Determines the biases of the local government unit in terms of budget allocation LGU type and income

class. Should not exceed with the ceiling as mandated by law, i.e., for 1st - 3rd class LGUs - 45%, for 4th -6th class LGUS - 55%.


Met these three conditions: (1) lower than the average of LGUs with the same LGU type and income class,(2) lower than national average of LGUs with the same LGU type regardless of income class, (3) Did notexceed the 45-55 ceiling for P.S.


18/20


Indicator:

Total Expenditure Per Capita

Computation:

Total expenditures/population

Significance: Describes how much was actually spent by the LGU in a per capita basis.




Should be higher than the: (1)average of LGUs with the same LGU type and income class, (2)nationalaverage of the same LGU type regardless of income class.


Indicator:

Debt Service Ratio

Computation:

Actual debt service cost/regular income

Significance:

Considers the proportion of actual debt service costs to total regular income.


Should not exceed 20% of the regular income. That is the debt servicing limitation set for under LG Code of1991.


19/20


20/20

Documents

Ozamiz Statistics