Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Oyster Restoration & Research in Virginia:
Some Metrics & How We Monitor Them
P.G. RossCollege of William and Mary
VA Institute of Marine ScienceEastern Shore Laboratory
Oyster Restoration WorkshopMyrtle Beach, SCMay 20-21, 2004
Restoration Projects
Now over 100 “restoration” sites in Virginia
Research Projects
NOAA, ACOE
VEE, VORHF, NOAA
NOAA Sea Grant
EPA-CBP
Research Funded By
Yes (proposed)
Possibly, brood stock
Possibly, brood stock
Yes, cultch
Adaptive Mgt.
VMRC1VA, ACOE Others
Oyster Heritage (2003-current)
VMRC1VA, ACOE Others
Army Corp. Project (2004-
current)
VMRC1ACOERappahannock River (2000-2002)
VMRC1CBBT, VA
Power, VMRC
Fisherman’s Island (1996-1999)
Built ByConstruction Funded ByProject
1 Built on sites chosen by and under the supervision of VMRC by commercial sub-contractors
Research Projects
400-8000 m2
400-8000 m2
100-500 m2
Scale
Sub
Sub
Inter
Ht.
64
10
13
# Reefs
64
4
1
# Sites
Monitoring biological &
physical parameters
Habitat/Brood stock4-11
OHP(‘03-’04) ACOE(‘04-)
Scale (landscape &
reef size), architecture
Habitat/Brood stock4Rapp.
(‘01-’02)
Community structure,
architecture Mitigation8FI
(‘96-’99)
Research Priorities
Restoration Purpose
Age (yrs)Project
Opportunistically utilize existing or planned reefs for larger scale research…
2 reefs
Now over 100 “restoration” sites in VirginiaGreat Wicomico RiverSalinity ~ 16 pptTide ~ 0.4 m
Rappahannock RiverSalinity ~ 15 pptTide ~ 0.5 m
Piankatank RiverSalinity ~ 16 pptTide ~ 0.4 m
Fisherman’s IslandSalinity ~ 30 pptTide ~1 m
Reef DesignTypical Marker Buoy
Individual Shell PilesFisherman’s Island
Rapp.
SEABED
REEF MOUND
WATER SURFACE (MLW)
~3 m
~1-2 mCrest
Flank
Base
Monitoring MethodsOyster Settlement
•Ceramic tiles, unglazed surface down • 5 cm above reef surface•Bi-weekly until settlement begins, then weekly
•Measure timing & intensity of recruitment
0
250
500
750
1000
1250
1500
5/17 6/7 6/28 7/19 8/9 8/30 9/20 10/11 11/1 11/22
Crane's CreekShell Bar
# O
yste
rs p
er m
2pe
r W
eek
Date
2003
•Diver collected substrate sample•25 x 25 cm to a depth of 10 cm•Intra-reef variation – replication•Spring, Summer & Fall
Epifaunal PopulationMonitoring Methods
•Determine oyster population status•ID species presence, richness, diversity•Develop trophic modelsOyster density, size & biomassEpifaunal diversity & trophic linksOyster sex ratioOyster female fecundityDisease prevalence & intensityGenotyping (DEBY vs. local strains)0
200
400
600
800
1000
Summer 2001 Fall 2001 Summer 20020
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
# •
m-2
(sol
id li
ne) H’ (dashed line)
Mean Epifaunal Abundance & Diversity (+/- SE)
Density, size & biomass
Sex ratio
Female fecundity
Disease prevalence & intensity
Genotyping
Monitoring MethodsOyster Population
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
CC SB BP PB DG PR
# O
yste
rs m
-2(+
/-SE
) May 2003
Reefs within Rappahannock
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
1 10 19 28 37 46 550
10
20
30
40
50
60
1 10 19 28 37 46 55
(A) Drumming Ground
Fall 2001 Summer 2002
# O
yste
rs p
er sa
mpl
e
Oyster Shell Ht. (1 mm intervals)
Monitoring MethodsOyster Mortality & Growth
•Remote settlement onto clean oyster shell•Manipulate density •Tether to frames•Deploy & recover during various seasons
•Estimate predation mortality•Indirectly measure food availability•Evaluate size specific groups
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
MC DG PR TB
2001-2002 Data Combined
Reef Site (Rappahannock Project)
% M
orta
lity•
Day
-1 (+
SE) A
B B B
Monitoring MethodsMotile Resident Community
•Bury baskets of reef material into reef matrix•Recover and capture organisms residing in baskets•6, 12 & 18 months post-deployment
•Species presence, richness, diversity •Develop trophic models
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 >40.5
Summer 2001
% X
anth
ids
Carapace Width, 1 mm intervals
Xanthid Size Frequency Distribution-Rapp. Project
0
0.001
0.002
0.003
0.004
0.005
0.006
0.007
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
Xanthid Abundance (# • m2)Oys
ter
Mor
talit
y (%
•da
y-1)
P=0.0282R2=0.472
•Species presence & abundance, richness, diversity•Develop trophic models
Monitoring MethodsTransient Community
Gill netTrawlEncircling seineObservational
transectsUnderwater video
surveillance
38Naked Goby (Gobiosoma bosci)
5Spot (Leiostomus xanthurus)
8Striped Bass (Morone saxatilis)
18White Perch (Morone americanus)
29Croaker (Micropogonias undulatus)
36Menhaden (Brevoortia tyrranus)
4Feather Blenny (Hypsoblennius hentzi)
55Skilletfish (Gobiesox strumosus)
(%)Species (Resident and Transient Groups)
Relative abundance of dominant species (Rapp 2001-2002)
Monitoring MethodsPhysical Characteristics of Reef
3-D shape & bathymetryInterstitial spaceSurface rugosityParticle geometryLarge scale flow patternsTemporal changes…..?
•Determine static vs. dynamic nature of veneer•Physical parameters to correlate with biological parameters
Monitoring MethodsPhysical Characteristics of Reef
Parrot’s Rock Bathymetry
Side Scan Sonar
-100 0 100 200 300 400 500 6000
100
200
300
400
500
Scale
25 cm/s
DISTANCE EAST (m)
DIS
TANC
E N
ORTH
(m)
ADV Stacked Flow Profile
Monitoring MethodsPhysical Characteristics of Reef
245 mm
140 mm
Oyster Mortality-Interstitial Space
y = 526224 x-2.2699
R2 = 0.8948p = 0.0092
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
40 45 50 55 60 65 70
% Interstitial Space
% O
yste
r M
orta
lity
Monitoring Methods
Semi-annually (July & Oct.)Oyster disease & genotyping
Bi-weekly (May-Sept.)Oyster fecundity
Bi-weekly (June-Sept.)Plankton tows (larvae)
Quarterly (spring, summer & fall)Quadrates (epifauna & physical)
Bi-weekly/weekly (June-Oct.)Oyster settlement (tiles)
FrequencyTechnique
Techniques Planned for 2004
Current projects mainly focused on monitoring oyster population
Utilizing correlation analysis and regression to determine relationships
GraniteLimestone Marl
Surf Clam Shell
Demolished Cinder Block
Demolished Concrete
Alternative Substrates
Particle size, interstitial volume & surface
rugosity
“Lessons Learned”Location, location, location
“Lessons Learned”Location, location, location
Architecture can matter
“Lessons Learned”Location, location, location
Architecture can matter
Reef matrix may be dynamic for sub tidal reefs
“Lessons Learned”Location, location, location
Architecture can matter
Reef matrix may be dynamic for sub tidal reefs
Large scale H2O quality (anoxia) & weather (hurricane/rainfall) events can have impacts on success
“Lessons Learned”Location, location, location
Architecture can matter
Reef matrix may be dynamic for sub tidal reefs
Large scale H2O quality (anoxia) & weather (hurricane/rainfall) events can have impacts on success
Success criteria are likely variable regionally & locally –minimal natural standards for comparison
“Lessons Learned”Location, location, location
Architecture can matter
Reef matrix may be dynamic for sub tidal reefs
Large scale H2O quality (anoxia) & weather (hurricane/rainfall) events can have impacts on success
Success criteria are likely variable regionally & locally –minimal natural standards for comparison
Measuring success at one point in time may be misleading-temporal trends may be more relevant
“Lessons Learned”Location, location, location
Architecture can matter
Reef matrix may be dynamic for sub tidal reefs
Large scale H2O quality (anoxia) & weather (hurricane/rainfall) events can have impacts on success
Success criteria are likely variable regionally & locally –minimal natural standards for comparison
Measuring success at one point in time may be misleading-temporal trends may be more relevant
When and how we sample really matters
Oyster population growth +, or at higher densities, at least stable over several years
Multiple oyster size/age cohorts present over time
Overall community diversity increasing over time to stabilize after 3-5 years
Key community species (i.e. trophically) present in multiple age classes. Identify species/genera in multiple taxa that are indicative of healthy community
Does community equilibrate quickly (e.g. 2-3 years) after significant environmental perturbations
Some Criteria for Success
Measurement of these variables requires multiple years of monitoring (possibly 5+ years continuously). The challenge is to get financial
commitments to longer-term monitoring than is currently standard
Potential Hurricane Impacts??
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
S P R IN G 2003 SU M M ER 2003 FA LL 2003
SB BP D G
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
S P R IN G 2003 SU M M ER 2003 FA LL 2003
C C PB PR
A) Reefs with stable oyster abundance
B) Reefs with lower oyster abundance
Hurricane Isabell
Hurricane Isabell
# O
yste
rs m
-2
substrate
collar
Flux MeasurementsFlux Measurements
BiBi--monthlymonthlyApr Apr –– Oct:Oct:
DIN (NHDIN (NH44++, NO, NO22
--
NONO33--), ),
DODODIP (PODIP (PO44
33--))DONDONChl aChl a
160 Cages Deployed June 2003
Cages
Reef Schematic
Pala
ce B
ar R
eef