29
Overview of Magnetic Measurement Techniques Animesh Jain Brookhaven National Laboratory Upton, New York 11973-5000, USA US Particle Accelerator School on Superconducting Accelerator Magnets Santa Barbara, California, June 23-27, 2003

Overview of Magnetic Measurement Techniques

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Overview of Magnetic Measurement Techniques

Overview ofMagnetic Measurement

TechniquesAnimesh Jain

Brookhaven National LaboratoryUpton, New York 11973-5000, USA

US Particle Accelerator School on Superconducting Accelerator MagnetsSanta Barbara, California, June 23-27, 2003

Page 2: Overview of Magnetic Measurement Techniques

USPAS, Santa Barbara, June 23-27, 2003 Animesh Jain, BNL2

Outline• Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR)/

Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR)• Hall Probes• Magnetoresistors• Fluxgate Magnetometers• Flux Measurements with Pick Up Coils• Magnetic Alignment – center and direction• Summary

Page 3: Overview of Magnetic Measurement Techniques

USPAS, Santa Barbara, June 23-27, 2003 Animesh Jain, BNL3

NMR/EPR Principle• A particle with a spin and a magnetic

moment precesses around an applied field.• The quantum energy levels are split into

several discrete levels, depending on thespin of the particle.

• The energy gap between these levels is proportional to the applied field.

• A resonant absorption of RF energy occurs at a frequency corresponding to energy gap.

Page 4: Overview of Magnetic Measurement Techniques

USPAS, Santa Barbara, June 23-27, 2003 Animesh Jain, BNL4

NMR/EPR PrincipleI = Spinγ = Gyromagnetic ratio

M = Magnetic Moment= γ.h.I

Energy = B.MSpin component along the field direction can take integral values from –I to +I. ⇒ Energy gap = γ.h.B

Frequency = γ.B

B

M

MagneticMoment

AppliedField

Precession

Page 5: Overview of Magnetic Measurement Techniques

USPAS, Santa Barbara, June 23-27, 2003 Animesh Jain, BNL5

Gyromagnetic Ratio

Particle γ (MHz/T) Application

e– 28026.5 0.5 to 3.2 mT1H 42.576396 0.04 to 2 T2H 6.53569 2 T to 14 T

3He 32.4336 Cryogenic27Al 11.0942 Cryogenic

Page 6: Overview of Magnetic Measurement Techniques

USPAS, Santa Barbara, June 23-27, 2003 Animesh Jain, BNL6

NMR Magnetometer

ModulationOscillator

Sample&

Hold

Trigger

Probe

∆B/B ~ 10–4 to 10–3; 30-70 Hz

RF

B

∆B

VCO

Page 7: Overview of Magnetic Measurement Techniques

USPAS, Santa Barbara, June 23-27, 2003 Animesh Jain, BNL7

Locking RF to NMR Resonance

B0

B0+∆B(t)

B0

B0+∆B(t)

NMR Signalwith

f and B0mismatched

NMR Signalwith

f and B0matched

Error

Resonance occurs at non-zero value of modulating signal.

NMR signals arrive at uneven intervals.

Resonance occurs at Zero value of modulating signal.

NMR signals arrive at even intervals.

Page 8: Overview of Magnetic Measurement Techniques

USPAS, Santa Barbara, June 23-27, 2003 Animesh Jain, BNL8

Requirements for NMRNMR can provide measurement of magnetic field with absolute accuracy of 0.1 ppm. However, certain requirements must be met:

• Field must be stable (< 1% per second).• Field must be homogeneous (< 0.1% per cm):

– The signal deteriorates; difficult to lock– Probe positioning accuracy becomes critical.One may locally compensate for the gradient using small gradient coils, to make measurements in inhomogeneous fields.

Page 9: Overview of Magnetic Measurement Techniques

USPAS, Santa Barbara, June 23-27, 2003 Animesh Jain, BNL9

The Hall Effect

––

BB⊥ I

F

VHall

v

+

θ

Charge carriers experience a Lorentz force in the presence of a magnetic field.

This produces a steady state voltage in a direction perpendicular to the current and field.

G = Geometric factor

RH = Hall Coefficient

θ⋅⋅⋅= cosHall BIRGV H

Page 10: Overview of Magnetic Measurement Techniques

USPAS, Santa Barbara, June 23-27, 2003 Animesh Jain, BNL10

The Planar Hall Effect

B B||

I

VPlanar

Curre

nt

If the field has a component in the plane defined by current flow and voltage contacts, then a signal is produced given by:

Important for mapping of 3-D fields.

)2sin(2||Planar ψ⋅∝ BIV

The Planar Hall Effect can be minimized by a suitable choice of geometry ⇒ sin(2ψ) = 0.In practice, the response of a Hall probe to the field direction is considerably more complex, requiring elaborate calibration.

Page 11: Overview of Magnetic Measurement Techniques

USPAS, Santa Barbara, June 23-27, 2003 Animesh Jain, BNL11

Compensating Planar Hall Effect- 2 Matched Hall probes- I directions as shown- Major component = By

is in the plane of theHall probes.

Sum of Planar Hall Voltages is proportional to:

[ ][ ]12

21

90 ;0)2sin()2sin(

ψ+°=ψ=ψ+ψ

Based on:R. Prigl, IMMW-11, BNL.

Page 12: Overview of Magnetic Measurement Techniques

USPAS, Santa Barbara, June 23-27, 2003 Animesh Jain, BNL12

Hall Measurement Specifications

• Typical Range: < 1 mT to 30 T

• Typical Accuracy ~ 0.01% to 0.1%

• Typical dimensions ~ mm

• Frequency response: DC to ~ 20 kHz(~ a few Hz for fully compensated signal)

• Time Stability: ±0.1% per year

Page 13: Overview of Magnetic Measurement Techniques

USPAS, Santa Barbara, June 23-27, 2003 Animesh Jain, BNL13

Hall Measurement Advantages• Simple, inexpensive devices, commercially

available.• Small probe size makes it suitable for a

large variety of applications.• Can measure all components of field.• Particularly suited for complex geometries,

such as detector magnets.• Can be used for fast measurements.• Can be used at low temperatures.

Page 14: Overview of Magnetic Measurement Techniques

USPAS, Santa Barbara, June 23-27, 2003 Animesh Jain, BNL14

Hall Measurement Disadvantages• Non-linear device, requires elaborate

calibration of sensitivity for each probe.• Sensitive to temperature: Calibrate as a

function of temperature; Keep temperature stable; Design compensated probes.

• Long term calibration drift.• Planar Hall effect can pose a problem for

mapping 3-D fields. Special geometries are needed for measuring minor components.

Page 15: Overview of Magnetic Measurement Techniques

USPAS, Santa Barbara, June 23-27, 2003 Animesh Jain, BNL15

Magneto-ResistorsB

I

VNiSb Precipitates

InSb Slab

Field bends the current path, thus altering the resistance.Hall voltage tends to reduce this effect.

NiSb precipitates “arrest” the build-up of charge on the sides; Non-linear device; Insensitive to polarity; Large temperature dependence; Modest sensitivity.Based on: L. Bottura, Field Measurement Methods, CERN School on Superconductivity, Erice, May 8-17, 2002.

Page 16: Overview of Magnetic Measurement Techniques

USPAS, Santa Barbara, June 23-27, 2003 Animesh Jain, BNL16

Fluxgate MagnetometersB

excitationcoil

bias coil

detection coil

+Bexcitation

-Bexcitation

B

excitationcoil

bias coil

detection coil

+Bexcitation

-Bexcitation

Courtesy: L. Bottura, CERN.

Excitation Coil:AC current drives a pair of ferromagnetic needles to saturation.Detection Coil:Detects Zero field condition.Bias Coil:Maintains a zero field condition.

Page 17: Overview of Magnetic Measurement Techniques

USPAS, Santa Barbara, June 23-27, 2003 Animesh Jain, BNL17

Fluxgate Principle: Zero FieldM

H

t

H

M

t

M1

M1+M2

M2

V

t

Excitation Profile (H ) is symmetric

Based on: L. Bottura, CAS on Superconductivity, Erice, 2002

Zero output in detection coil

Page 18: Overview of Magnetic Measurement Techniques

USPAS, Santa Barbara, June 23-27, 2003 Animesh Jain, BNL18

M

H

t

HH0

V

t

M

t

M1

M2

M1+M2

Excitation Profile (H ) is asymmetric Based on: L. Bottura, CAS on

Superconductivity, Erice, 2002

Output of detection coil

Fluxgate Principle: Non-Zero Field

Page 19: Overview of Magnetic Measurement Techniques

USPAS, Santa Barbara, June 23-27, 2003 Animesh Jain, BNL19

Fluxgate Characteristics• Highly sensitive, linear, directional device.• Typical field range ~ a few mT.

(Limited by capability of the bias coils)• Bandwidth: DC to ~ 1 kHz.• Sensitivity: ~ 20 pT (~1 nT commercial).• Accuracy: ~ 0.1%

(depends on calibration and stability)• Used in navigation, geology, mapping of

fringe fields, etc.

Page 20: Overview of Magnetic Measurement Techniques

USPAS, Santa Barbara, June 23-27, 2003 Animesh Jain, BNL20

excitationcoil

biascoil

detectioncoil

B

I

Current to be measured

Courtesy:L. Bottura, CERN.

DC Current Transformer

Senses magnetic field produced by a current carrying conductor passing through a toroidalcore.Used for accurate measurement of high currents(~10-100 ppm typical)

DCCT: A Special Fluxgate

Page 21: Overview of Magnetic Measurement Techniques

USPAS, Santa Barbara, June 23-27, 2003 Animesh Jain, BNL21

Flux Measurements: Induction LawFlux through a coil defined by the surface S is:

B

SV(t)

Coil

∫ ⋅=ΦS

d SB

If the flux linked varies with time, a loop voltage is induced, given by:

⋅−=

Φ−= ∫

S

ddtd

dtdtV SB)(

The time dependence may be caused by either a varying field or a varying surface area vector, or both.

Page 22: Overview of Magnetic Measurement Techniques

USPAS, Santa Barbara, June 23-27, 2003 Animesh Jain, BNL22

Flux MeasurementsTime dependence of flux gives:

B

SV(t)

Coil

⋅−=

Φ−= ∫

S

ddtd

dtdtV SB)(

The change in flux is given by:

⌡⌠ ⋅−=Φ−Φend

start

t

t

startend dttV )(

and can be measured by integrating the voltage signal.

To know the flux at a given instant, one needs to know Φstart

⇒ (1) Use Φstart = 0; (2) Flip Coil/Rotating coil: startend Φ=Φ m

Page 23: Overview of Magnetic Measurement Techniques

USPAS, Santa Barbara, June 23-27, 2003 Animesh Jain, BNL23

ab

h

Point Coil Insensitive up to4th order spatial harmonic with proper choice of height and radii.

Rc

X

Y

θπ/m

θ'=θ+π/(2m)

Multipole Coil Sensitive to only odd multiples of a specified harmonic (Morgan Coils)

Flat Coil (Line or Area Coil) –Fixed coil; Varying field–Flip Coil/Moving Coil; Static field–Rotating Tangential/Radial

Common Coil Geometries

Page 24: Overview of Magnetic Measurement Techniques

USPAS, Santa Barbara, June 23-27, 2003 Animesh Jain, BNL24

Flux Measurements: Hardware

± 5 VVin(t) G 0-10 V

Counters

N

NrefVref(+5 V)

Referencefrequencyfref = α fmax

VFC10 V = fmax

Digital Integrator: Directly gives change in flux.10-100 ppmaccuracy.

Digital Votmeter: Gives rate of changeof flux. Numerical Integration and/or well controlled coil movement is needed.

Page 25: Overview of Magnetic Measurement Techniques

USPAS, Santa Barbara, June 23-27, 2003 Animesh Jain, BNL25

Measurements with Pick up Coils• Simple, passive, linear, drift-free devices.• Require change in flux ⇒ ramp field with

static coil, or move coil in a static field. Pay attention to ramping/moving details.

• Measure flux, not field. ⇒ Calibration of geometry very important; limits accuracy.

• Field variations across the coil area must be accounted for ⇒ harmonic analysis.

• Field harmonics can be measured at ppm level.• Field direction can be measured to ~ 50 µrad.

Page 26: Overview of Magnetic Measurement Techniques

USPAS, Santa Barbara, June 23-27, 2003 Animesh Jain, BNL26

Determination of Magnetic Center

MAGNET

To Integrator

X-Y Stage Wire

Stretched Wire Measurements• Move a stretched wire in a magnet• Measure change in flux for various types of motion.

• Use expected field symmetry to locate the magnetic center.

Colloidal Cell• Place ferromagnetic fluid in the field

• Illuminate with polarized light

• Observe with crossed analyzer

Page 27: Overview of Magnetic Measurement Techniques

USPAS, Santa Barbara, June 23-27, 2003 Animesh Jain, BNL27

Rotating Coils• Angular Encoder and Gravity Sensors

• Accuracy 50-100 µrad• Frequent re-calibrations

EncoderEncoder

Gravity Gravity SensorsSensors

CoilCoilDetermination of Field Direction

LASER

BEAMSPLITTER

MAGNETICNEEDLE

MIRROR

OPTICALFILTER

POSITION SENSITIVE DETECTOR

Mirror& Needle

• For solenoids• Resolution~ 10 µrad

Based on: C. Crawford et al., FNAL and BINP, Proc. PAC'99, p. 3321-3

Page 28: Overview of Magnetic Measurement Techniques

USPAS, Santa Barbara, June 23-27, 2003 Animesh Jain, BNL28

Summary• Numerous methods exist for measurement of

magnetic fields. Only some of them are in common use for measuring accelerator magnets.

• NMR technique is the standard for absolute accuracy, but can not be used in all situations.

• Hall probes are very popular for point measurements, such as for field mapping of detector magnets.

• A variety of pick up coils are the most often used tools for characterizing field quality in accelerator magnets.

• Innovative techniques have been developed for alignment measurements to suit various applications.

Page 29: Overview of Magnetic Measurement Techniques

USPAS, Santa Barbara, June 23-27, 2003 Animesh Jain, BNL29

For More Information• Knud Henrichsen’s bibliography:

http://mypage.bluewin.ch/hera/magnet

• CERN Accelerator Schools on Magnetic Measurements:– March 16-20, 1992, Montreux (CERN 92-05, 15 Sep. 1992)– April 11-17, 1997, Anacapri (CERN 98-05, 4 Aug. 1998)

• Proceedings of Magnet Measurement Workshops:– IMMW-1 (1977) to IMMW12 (2001); IMMW13 (May 2003)

• Proceedings of Particle Accelerator Conferences:– PAC (1965-2001); EPAC (1988-2002)

• Proceedings of Magnet Technology Conferences:– MT-1 (1965) to MT-17 (2001).