Outline in Family Law 2014

8/10/2019 Outline in Family Law 2014

1/58


2/58

2

2. ooperate and collaborate with other students working in teams

3. &ther

!(&7*++I&8A) *85A5**8T I8 )AW +9&&)

As you may know, you are creating your professional reputation in the law.

Accordingly, please behave as the best attorneys do. This includes paying

attention and responding to what others say as well as working with others to

collectively learn the material.

!lease be prepared for class and to be ready to work. !lease listen to others,

avoid dominating discussion, take the initiative to improve your skills, take

risks and be resourceful. !lease seek help when you reali$e you need it or

when recommended. !lease show up every day on time and stay in class the

whole time.

If you are unable to attend a class due to illness or other good reason, please

notify me before class, if at all possible. ou may receive an e"cused

absence if you notify me in writing why you need to miss class and provide

me with sufficient information for me to e"cuse you. If you accumulate 1 or

more une"cused absences, you will fail the course and you will be given a

;1< in the class.

ou are responsible for learning information and getting the handouts

provided in class or made available online. If you missed class, talk to

classmates to learn what happened and get notes.

When you are in class, please beprepared to participate in the discussion=

and to engage. Being ;prepared< does not mean you have become an e"pert

on the material> it does mean that you will have read ?generally more than

once for court opinions@ and thought about the assigned materials, completed

assigned work, and be ready to engage and discuss this work with others.

ou will not be penali$ed for asking what you might think are ;stupid

#uestions< or letting me know when you are confused. ou are responsible,

however, for asking #uestions when you do not understand material.

In class, you are each responsible for participating to an appropriate e"tent,

i.e., neither being silent nor dominating the discussion, but doing your share

of the talking.


3/58

3

If you cannot prepare for a class, please notify me that you are unprepared at

the beginning of class. Being unprepared counts as an une"cused absence. If

you are not prepared for some classes, I may ask you to leave. This would be

because we will be discussing material specific to a graded assignment, and

it is only appropriate to have the discussion with students who have already

completed the assignment.

8ote: + (ules re#uired:

. -2-, Adoption

-. -, 8ullity

, -, )egal +eparation

0. --, !rovisional &rders

1. 00, ustody of inors

2. 0, 'AW

I. I8T(&%CTI&8

Tolentino, ivil ode, pp. D66 *ditionE

II. *77*T A8% A!!)IATI&8 &7 )AW+

Arts. to , pp. 1- of Tolentino

8 4

A. When law takes effect

8 -

(evised Administrative ode ?(A@ +ecs. 4-0

*"ec. &rder -, +ec. -

TaFada v. Tuvera 2 +(A -3

Acaac v Azcuna, Jr., G.R. No. 187378, SEP 30, 2013

B. Ignorance of the law

8

GA+I)A5 '+.(&%(I5C*H,26!9I) -3


4/58

4

. (etroactivity of laws

8 0, cf. 8 --1- --26

(evised !enal ode ?(!@ --

7amily ode ?7@ -12

+imon v han, 5.(. 8o. 13103, 7ebruary -, -

7rancisco vs. A , 5.(. 8o. -. 8ovember -1, 664

7: !esca vs. !esca, 5.(. 8o. 26-. April 3, -

%. andatory or !rohibitory )aws

8 Art. 1 with 8 Art. 3 ?@

8erwin v !8&, 5.(. 8o. 2313, April , --

*. Waiver of rights

8 Art. 2

8 Art. -1

% onsuni vs. A, 5.(. 8o. 343, April -, -

'illareal v !eople, 5.(.8o.1-14, 7ebruary, --

7. (epeal of laws

8 3

cf. 643 onstitution, Art. J'III +ec.

7 -10, -11

Thornton vs. Thornton, Aug. 2, -0

+ Kudicial %ecisions

8 4

!esca vs. !esca, 5.(. 8o. 26-. April 3, -


5/58

5

%e astro v KB, 5. (. 8o. 6-, April -, -

Republc v Ren!an Enterpr"e", GR 1##310, $eb.1#, 201%

9. %uty to render udgment

8 6,

(! 1

!eople v. (itter 60 +(A 26

Alon$o v !adua, 1 +(A 36

I. !resumption and Applicability of ustom

8 -cf. 643 onstitution, Art. JII +ec. 1

(ules of ourt (ule -6 ?-@, ?@

artine$ v. 'an Buskirk, 4 !hil. 36

K. )egal periods

8

cf. (ules of ourt ?(&@ (ule --

(A +ec.

Internal (evenue v !rimetown, 5( 2-11, August -4, -3

G.Applicability of !enal )aws

8 0, 3?@, (! Art. -

). Binding effect

8 1

cf. 7 -2

Tenchave$ v. *scaFo 1 +(A 11

ATI &verseas orp vs. *chin, 5.(. 8o. 3411, &ct. , -


6/58

Tuna !rocessing Inc. v !hil. Gingford, 4114-, 7eb. -6, --

8 2

Amos v Bellis, - +(A 14

8 3

(aytheon v (ou$ie, 5( 2-460, 7ebruary -2, -4

8 4

Tamano v &rti$, 5.(. 8o. -22, Kune -6, 664

)lave vs (epublic, 5( 26322, arch , -

Hamoranos v !eople, 5.(. 8o. 66-, Kune , -Vllagraca v S&ara, GR 188832, Aprl 23, 201%

III. !*(+&8+ L !*(+&8A)IT

A. The concept of a MpersonN and MpersonalityN

8 3 6

lasses of persons and their distinctions

*lements of civil capacity

Kuridical capacity v. personality

Kuridical capacity v. capacity to act

B. ommencement and termination of personality

. 8atural !ersons

?a@ Birth

8 0 0

643 onstitution, Art. II +ec. -

!.%. 2 Dhild and outh Welfare odeE, Art. 1

7 20


7/58

6

(! Arts. -12 -16

5elu$ v. A - +(A 4

Ouimiging v. Icao 0 +(A 0

%e Kesus v. +y#uia 14 !hil 422

ontinental +teel v. ontano, 5( 4-42, &ctober , -6

?b@ %eath

8 0-

)imoco v. Intestate *state of !io 7ragante 4 !hil 332

Valno v Adrano, GR 1828#%, Aprl 22, 201%

8 0

(& (ule +ec. ?@ ?kk@ ?646 (ev. (ules on *vidence@

Koa#uin v. 8avarro 6 !hil -13

-. Kuridical !ersons

8 0003

Batas !ambansa Blg. 24 ?orp. ode@, +ecs. -, 0, 3

8 323324

. (estrictions on civil capacity

. !resumption of capacity, Art. 3 8

atalan vs. Basa, 5.(. 8o. 16123, Kuly , -3

-. (estrictions on capacity to act

8 4 6, cf. 8 -3

?a@ inority


8/58

7

. Age of maority, (.A. 246

-. A.. 8&. -1+ (ules on 5uardianship

. +uffrage, +ec. Art. ' 643 onstitution Dcf. Sanggunang

'abataan(

0. arriage, 7 1> 01 ?@> cf. (.A. 246

1. ontracts

8 -3

8 6 ?par. @, 0 ?par. @

8 63, 66

8 046

8 0-2 0-3

ercado v. *spiritu 3 !hil -1Bambalan v. aramba 1 !hil 03

+uan hian v. Alcantara 41 !hil 226

Bragan$a v. 'illaAbrille 1 !hil 012

2. riminal liability

(! - ?-@ ?@>

(! ?-@> !% 2 +ecs. 46 P -0

Also see: (ule , +ection 1 663 (ules of ivil !rocedure

Kuvenile Kustice )aw, +ecs 2 and 3

Ati$ado vs !eople, 5( 8o. 34--, &ctober , -

?b@ Insanity

. arriage, 7 01 ?-@, Art. 36

-. ontracts, 8 -3 ?@, -4

. riminal liability,

(! - ?@

(ule , (ules of ourt

C+ v. 'aguilar, -3 !hil 44

!eople v. (afanan -0 +(A 21


9/58


10/58

10

-. 8atural persons

8 1

7 2426, cf. 8

cf. 7 11, , 06, 1-,

Kalosos v &*)*, 5( 663, April -0, --

I'. I8T(&%CTI&8 T& T9* 7AI) &%*

Tolentino, ;!ersons and 7amily (elations in the ivil ode 8 -32> 8 0 -?c@

--

9ermosisima v. A 6 !hil 2-6

Wassmer v. 'ele$ - +(A 204

Tananco v. A 4 +(A 660

Baksh v. A, -6 +(A 1Abanag v abute, A !-6--, April 0, -

%. (e#uisites for a valid marriage


12/58

12

Tolentino --- -26

ariategui v. A -1 +(A 3

. Ginds of re#uisites L effects of noncompliance

7 -> 7 0> 7 1> 7 1> 7 01 cf. 8 1

(! 11

%e iares vs 'illalu$, -30 +(A

-. *ssential re#uisites

?a@ )egal apacity

?i@ 5ender, 7 - ? @ cf. 7 04

+ilverio vs (epublic, &ctober --, -3

?ii@. Age

7 1> 7 1 ?@> (.A. 246 cf. 7 -

8 10 L 4 ?@

(! 00

cf. %&K &pinion 01 +.66 ?&ct. 66@

?iii@ Absence of impediment, 7 1, 1

5arcia vs. (ecio, 21 +(A 03

Te vs. hoa, 5.(. 8o. -2002, 8ov. -6, - ?02 +(A

-3@

8ollora v !eople, 5( 60-1, +eptember 3, -

Avendo v Avendo, G.R. No. 173%0, Jan 22 201%

. !arental consent

7 0> 7 01 ?@

0. onsent freely given by both spouses

?a@. istake as to identity,


13/58

13

7 1 ?1@> 8 42 ?@

?b@. *ffect of insanity, 7 01 ?-@

?c@. *ffect of fraud, 7 01 ?@> 7 02, 8 4 P

00

Anaya vs !alaroan, 8ov. -2, 63

?d@. *ffect of force, intimidation and undue

influence, 7 01 ?0@> 8 1 P 3

'illanueva vs A, 11 +cra 120

?e@. *ffect of physical incapacity/impotence, 7

01 ?1@

Kimene$ v. aFi$ares 6 !hil -3

Alca$ar v Alca$ar, 5.(. 8o. 3001, &ctober ,

-6

?f@ *ffect of affliction with +T%, 7 01 ?2@> 02 ?@

1. 7ormal (e#uisites

?a@ arriage license

(epublic v. A, -2 +(A -13

+y vs. A, 5.(. 8o. -3-2, April -, -

Alcantara vs. Alcantara, 5.(. 8o. 23302, Aug. -4, -3%e astro v %e astro, 5.(. 8o. 23-, 7ebruary , -4

Abbas vs Abbas, 5.(. 8o. 4462, Kanuary , -

. Where to apply, 7 6


14/58

14

-. (e#uirements for issuance

a. application, 7

b. proof of capacity, 7 -0> 7 - cf. 8 40

cf. %&K &pinion 1 +. 66 ?April , 66@

%&K &pinion 02 +. 66 ?&ct. 3, 66@

c. parental advice, 7 1

d. marriage counseling, 7 2

e. publication, 7 3

f. investigation of impediments, 7 4

g. payment of fees, 7 6

h. family planning certificate, !.%. 621

. !lace where valid, 7 -

0. !eriod of validity, 7 -

1. %uties of the ivil (egistrar, 7 -0-1

Alcantara vs Alcantara, 5( 8o. 23302, Aug. -4, -3

2. marriages e"empt from license re#uirement

7 -30, cf. 8 32, !.%. 4

8iFal vs. Bayadog, 5.(. 334, ar. 0, -

%e astro vs. %e astro, 5.(. 23-, 7ebruary ,-4

(epublic vs %ayot, arch -4, -4

?b@ Authority of the solemni$ing officer

. Who are authori$ed

7 3, , L -

8 12, 30, 32

(.A. 32 ?66 )ocal 5overnment ode@,

+ecs. 000?b@?@?"viii@, 001 ?b@?@?"viii@


15/58

15

Aranes vs &cciano, 4 +(A 0-

8avarro v. %omagtoy +.. A.. TK6244, Kuly 6, 662

-. 9ow authori$ed

7 3 ?-@ cf. 8 6-62

'illar v. !araiso 62 !hil 216

. *ffect of absence of authority

7 0> 7 1 ?-@

(! 1-cf. Tenchave$ v. *scaFo, 1 +(A 11 at page 2

0. %uties of the solemni$ing officer, 7 --0

1. *ffect of irregularity, 7 0

?c@ arriage eremony

. form of ceremony, 7 ?@> 7 2 cf. 7 , 7 4

artine$ v. Tan - !hil 3

&!A(* T&: origo v !eople, 5.(. 8o. 01--2.

7ebruary 2, -0

-. !lace for ceremony, 7 4> 7 -4-6> 7 -

. Issuance of marriage certificate, 7 2> 7 --, -

adrideo v. %e )eon 11 !hil

!eople v. Borromeo +(A 2


16/58

1

*. )aw governing validity of marriages abroad

Tolentino -2 -2

. 5eneral rule in contracts

?a@ As to form, 8 3 ?@ and ?-@

?b@ As to substantive re#uirements, 8 1 L 3 ?@

-. +pecial rule in marriage

-a le/ loc celebraton", 7 -2> 7 -, 7

ao Gee v. +y5on$ales, 23 +(A 342

(epublic vs. &rbecido III, 5.(. 8o. 104, &ctober 1,-1

7uiki v arinay, 5.(. 8o. 6206, Kune -2, -

?b@ *"ceptions

7 -2 in relation to

7 1?@, 1?0@, 1?1@ and ?2@, 2, 3 L 4

cf. 8 3

%&K &pinion 8o. +. 66 ?Kan. 3, 66@

7. ommonlaw marriages/ MliveinN relationships

7 03, cf. (! 1

7 04 ?;adulterous


17/58

16

5. 'oid arriages

Tolentino -3

5eneral rule, 7 0

. Ginds of void marriages

?a@ Absence of re#uisites

cf. 'II ?%@ of &utline

7 1 cf. 7 -0, (A 246

Alcantara v Alcantara, 5( 8&. 233002, Aug. 4,

-3

+o v 'alera, 5( 1233, Kune 1, -6%e astro v %e astro, 5.(. 8o. 23-, 7eb. ,

-4

(epublic v %ayot, 5.(. 8o. 3114, arch -4, -4

Abbas vs Abbas, 5.(. 8o. 4462, Kanuary , -

?b@ Bigamous and polygamous marriages,

7 1?0@, 6, 0, 0, 00

(! 00, 06

ercado vs Tan, 3 +(A --

Bobis v Bobis, 5( 616, Kuly , -

Ty vs. A, 5.(. 8o.-302, 8ov. -3, -

origo vs origo, 0-- +(A

Tenebro vs. A, 5.(. 8o. 1314. 7ebruary 4, -0

?read concurring of Kustice 'itug and dissent of Kustice

arpio@

Teves v !eople, 5( 44331, August -0, -

8ollora v !eople, 5( 60-1, +eptember 3, -ontane$ vs ipriano, 5( 446, &ctober --, --

apl v People, GR 18380, Jul 3, 2013

+ee: Abbas vs Abbas, 5.(. 8o. 4462, Kanuary ,

-

!eople v &dtuhan, 5( 6122, Kuly 3, -

Iwasawa vs 5angan, , 5.(. 8o. -026, +*! -


18/58

17

?c@ +ubse#uent marriage, upon reappearance of absent spouse

7 0 in relation to 7 0-00

8 66, 7 11 ?6@, 7

Kones v. 9ortiguela 20 !hil 36

(epublic vs. 8olasco, -- +(A -, arch 3, 66

Bienvenido vs. A, -3 +(A 232, &ctober -0, 660

+++ vs Kar#ue, 5.(. 8o. 21101, arch -0, -2

!rocedure

(epublic v 5ranada, 5( 8o. 431-, Kune , --

?d@ Bad faith of both spouses, under 7 00, 0, 0, 01

?e@ !sychological incapacity under 7 2

7 2, 6, 243

(.A. 41

+antos v. A -0 +(A -

hi ing Tsoi v. A 5.(. 8o. 66, Kan. 2, 663

(epublic v olina, 5.(. 8o. 432 7ebruary , 663

9ernande$ vs. ourt of Appeals, - +(A 32,

%ecember 4, 666

arcos vs. arcos, 0 +(A 311, &ctober 6, -

(epublic vs. %agdag, 1 +(A 0-1

(! vs. Ouintero9amano, 5.(. 8o. 06064, ay -,

-0

Antonio vs.(eyes, 5.(. 8o. 114, ar. ,-1(epublic vs. Tanyag+an Kose, 13 +(A -, 7ebruary

2, -3

Almelor vs (T)as !inas, 5( 8o. 362-, Aug. -2,

-4

Te vs Te, 5( 8o. 236, 7eb. , -6

A$cueta vs (!, 5.(. 8o. 4224, ay -2, -6


19/58

18

9alili v 9alili, 5( 210-0, Kune 6, -6 ?otion for

(econ@

8aera v 8aera, 5( 2043, Kuly , -6

amacho(eyes v (eyes, 5.(. 8o. 41-42, August 4,

-

(epublic vs *ncelan, 5.(. 8o. 3--, Kan. 6, -

Republc v e Graca, GR. No. 1717, $eb. 12, 201%

?f@ Incestuousmarriages, 7 3 cf. 8 62623

?g@ arriages against public policy

7 4, compare 7 4?2@ with 8 4?2@

(! -02

8 4?3@, 4-8 62623

?h@ 8oncompliance under 7 1, 1-

+ec. -, -- and -, A.. 8o. -+. arch 0, -

-. Who can invoke nullity, 7 2, 7 6, 7 0

+ec. -, A.. 8o. -+. arch 0, -

8iFal vs. Bayadog, 5.(. 334, ar. 0, -

atalan vs. ourt of Appeals, 10 +(A 23, 7ebruary 2, -3

*nrico vs. 9eirs of +ps. edinaceli, 5.(. 8o. 320,

+eptember -4, -3

arlos s. +andoval, 5( 366--, %ecember 2, -4

Abla$a v (epublic, 5.(. 8o. 14-64, August , -

. When to file action for declaration of nullity

7 6 in relation to 7 -11, -12

7 0-, par. -

0. !rocedure in actions for declaration of nullity


20/58

20

a. (e#uisite for valid remarriage, see 'II ?*@?@?b@

above

b. +afeguards against collusion, 7 04

alcampo +in vs. +in, 11 +(A -41

Ancheta vs Ancheta, 0-0 +(A 3-1

(epublic v A, 5.(. 8o. 16160, 8ovember -, --

c. 8o confession of udgment, 7 04> cf. 8 -1

d. A.. 8o. -+. arch 0, -

Kocson v. (obles -- +(A 1-

Tolentino v. 'illanueva 12 +(A

e. !articipation of the &+5

endo$a v (epublic, 5( 13410, 8ovember -, --

f. 8o otion to %ismiss

Aurelio v Aurelio, 5.(. 8o. 3123, Kune 2, -

g. &ther atters

han v han, 5.(. 8o. 36342, Kuly, 0, -

1. *ffects of pendency of action for declaration of nullity Art.

06, 64, 1 ?-@

2. *ffects of re" udcata

allion vs Alcantara, 12 +(A 2

3. *ffects of final udgment declaring nullity

?a@ In general, 7 110, 64, - but see 7

0304


21/58

21

?b@ &n remarriage, 7 0, 0

Wiegel v. +empio%iy, 0 +(A 066 ?642@

Terre v. Terre, - +(A 2

%omingo v. A --2 +(A 13-

ariFo vs. ariFo 1 +(A -3

Bobis vs. Bobis, 5.(. 8o. 416, Kuly , -

ercado vs.Tan, 5.(. 8o 3, August , -

Ty vs A, 02 +(A -3

origo vs origo, 0-- +(A 32

ontane$ v ipriano, 5( 446, &ct. --,

--


?c@ &n rights L obligations between the former spouses

?d@ &n the property regime of the marriage

7 0304

'aldes v. O(T, 5.(. 8o. --306, Kuly , 662

%ino v %ino, 5( 3400, Kanuary 6, -

u v (eyesarpio, 5( 46-3, Kune 1, -

abre$a v abre$a, 5.(. 8o. 462-, Kanuary 2, --

?e@ &n MlegitimesN of the common children

7 11, 7 1 in rel to 8 442, 444>

7 32

8 64, 2

+ec. -, A.. 8o. -+. arch 0, -

&!A(* T&: 7 03


&!A(* T&:

u v arpio(eyes, 5( 46-3, Kune 1, -

?f@ &n the status and custody of children, 7 10, -


22/58

22

?g@ &n use of surnames, 8 Art. 3, 20, 26

asin vs +hariQa, 5.(. 8o.60642 7ebruary -, 661

B. . 8&. 2-1 K&+*!9I8* !. CTI&+A

(emo v %7A, arch -

?h@ &n hereditary rights, 7 0, 0, %

?i@ *ffect of death, Art. ,

9eirs of 5o v +ervacio, 5( 1313, +ept. 3, -

9. 'oidable arriages

Tolentino -3

1+ 'oid v. voidable marriages, 7 0 cf. 01

Weigel vs. +empio%y 0 +(A 066

Terre vs. Terre - +(A 2

-.

5rounds for annulment

?a@ Absence of parental consent,

7 0, 1, 0, 01?@, 03?@, 1 ?@, cf (.A. 246

?b@ Insanity, 7 01?-@, 03?-@, 8 Art. 06

Gatipunan v Tenorio, 4 &5 3-, 63

&ropesa v &ropesa, 5( 401-4, April -1, --

?c@ 7raud

7 01?@, 02, 03?@


23/58

23

9ernande$ vs. ourt of Appeals, %ecember 4, 666

8 400

Buccat v. Buccat 3- !hil 06

A#uino v. %eli$o 4 !hil -

Anaya v. !alaroan 2 +(A 63

Almelor vs. (T, 5.(. 8o. 362-, August -2, -4

?d@ 7orce, intimidation and undue influence

7 01?0@, 03?0@

8 13

(! 00, last paragraph

(ui$ v Atien$a, 0 &.5. 6 ?60@

'illanueva v A, 11 +(A 120

?e@ !hysical incapacity/impotence

7 01?1@, 03?1@

Kimene$ v. aFi$ares 6 !hil -3

+arao v 5uevara, 60, 0 &5 +upp -2

Alca$ar vs Alca$ar, 5( 3001, &ctober , -6

?f@ Affliction with +T%, 7 ?01?2@, compare with 7 02?@,

03?1@

?g@ &thers

Republc v Albo", G.R. No. 1#8780, *ctober 14, 2013

. Who can seek annulment, 7 03, +ec. , A 8o. -+,

arch 0, -

0. When to seek annulment. 7 03, 8 06


24/58

24

1. !rocedure in actions for annulment, see 'II?*@?@?b@?d@

7 Art. 04, A.. 8o. -+. arch 0, -

Barcelona vs. A, 5. (. 43, +ept. -0, -

2. *ffects of pendency of action for annulment

7 06, 64, -

A. 8o. --+. arch 0, -

3. *ffects of annulment, 7 110, 0, -, -6, -

?a@ In general

hanTan v han, 5.(. 8o. 236, 7ebruary -1, -

?b@ &n remarriage, 7 Art. 0

?c@ &n rights L obligations between the former spouses, 64

?d@ &n the property regime of the marriage

7 1, 7 0?-@ cf. 7 -?0@, -6, 4

Buenaventura v A, 5.(. 8o. -314. arch , -1

Ouiao v Ouiao, 5. (. 8o. 42--, Kuly 0, --

?e@ &n Mpresumptive legitimes/hereditary rights

7 11, 0 ?-@, 7 1 in rel to 8 442, 444>

7 32

8 64, 2

7 - ?1@ and ?2@, -6 ?4@ and ?6@


?f@ &n the status and custody of children, 7 10, -

?g@ &n use of surnames, 8 Art. 3, 20, 26

asin vs +hariQa, 5.(. 8o.60642 7ebruary -, 661

B.. 8&. 2-1 K&+*!9I8* !. CTI&+A


25/58

25

(emo v %7A, arch -

I. arriage when one spouse is absent

7 000, compare with 8 4, 41?-@ and 43?-@

cf. (! 06

+++ vs. %e Bailon, 5.(. 8o. 21101, arch -0, -2

'alde$ v (epublic, 5.(. 8o. 442,+eptember 4, -6

K. arriages dissolved by a foreign udgment

8 1, 3 ?@7 -2

Arca vs Kavier, Kuly , 610

Tenchave$ v. *scaFo, 1 +(A 11

'an %orn v. (omillo, 6 +(A 6

+omera v. !ilapil, 30 +(A 22

Ouita vs A, +(A 02

)lorente vs A, 01 +(A 16-

5arcia vs. (ecio, 22 +(A 03

%iego vs astillo, 02 +(A 23

(! vs. &rbecido, 5.(.8o. 104, &ct. 1, -1

+an )uis vs. +an )uis, 5.(. 30, 7eb. -, -3

Amoratalan vs. a, 5.(. 8o. 236, 7ebruary 2, -3

orpus v +to Tomas, 5.(. 8o. 4213, August , -


G. arriages giving rise to criminal liability

Art. 0, Art. 2, Art. 0

8 40, (! 11-, 7 2326

(.A. 2611, ;An Act to %eclare Cnlawful the !ractice of

atching 7ilipino Women for arriage to 7oreign 8ationals


26/58

2

(.A. 6-4, AntiTrafficking in !ersons Act of -, as amended by

(A 20

'I. T9* )AW &8 +*!A(ATI&8 &7 T9* +!&C+*+

A. oncepts of separation L divorce

. +eparation in fact, 7 -4-04, ?@

'illanueva v hiong, 5( 16446, Kune 1, -4

-. Agreements to separate, 7 , 8 -- ?@

*spinosa v &mana, A.. 8o. 64, &ctober, -, -

. Absolute divorce

?a@ %ivorce under the 7amily ode

7 -2, paragraph -

Tenchave$ v. *scaFo, 1 +(A 11

'an %orn v. (omillo, 6 +(A 6

+omera v. !ilapil, 30 +(A 22

7uiki v arinay,5.(. 8o. 6206, Kune -2, -

?b@ %ivorce under the uslim ode, 0111

)lave v (epublic, 5.(. 8o. 26322, arch , -Hamoranos v !eople, 5.(. 8o. 66-, Kune , -

B. oncept of legal separation, compare with 8 63

. 5rounds for legal separation P Art. 11 7, (A 6-2-


27/58

26

A.. 8o. -+. arch 0, -

?a@ +e"ual infidelity or perversion

7 11?4@

8 2

(! L 0

(! -03

5oitia v. ampos(ueda 1 !hil -1-

5andionco v. !eFaranda 11 +(A 3-1

Galaw v 7ernande$, 5( 2213, +eptember 6, -

(epublic v Ouintos, 5( 16160, 8ovember -, --

?b@ %rug addiction, habitual alcoholism, lesbianism or

homose"uality

7 11 ?1@ and ?2@ compare with 7 02?0@

Almelor v (T, 5( 8o. 362-, Aug. -2, -4

ampos v ampos, A.. 8o. TK32, 7eb. 4, --

?c@ Attempt on the life of the other spouse

7 11?6@, compare with 8 63?-@

(ep. Act 6-2-

?d@ Abandonment

7 Art. 11 ?@

7 par. , compare with separation in fact

(epublic v Ouintos, 5( 16160, 8ovember -, --

?e@ &ther grounds

7 11 ?@

5oitia vs ampos(ueda, 1 !hils -1-

Galaw v 7ernande$, 5( 2213, +eptember 6, -


28/58

27

-. Who can ask for legal separation

7 11, compare with 8 66

. When may petition be filed

7 13, compare with 8 -, 8 66

)apu$ v. *ufemio 0 +(A 33

atubis v. !ra"edes, 6 !hil 346

!eople v. Hapata 44 !hil 244

0. ourt procedure in legal separation

7 142>

+ec 6, (A 6-2-

A.. 8o. -+. arch 0, -

Araneta vs oncepcion, 66 !hil 36

&campo v 7lorenciano, 3 !hil 1

)apu$ vs *ufemio, 0 +(A 33

+amosa vs 'amenta, Kr., 02 +(A

!acete v. ariaga, - +(A -

1. *ffect of pendency of the petition, 7 22-

?a@ coolingoff period,7 14

?b@ right of consortium, 7 2 par.

?c@ administration of property, 7 2 par. -

%e la 'iFa v. 'illareal 0 !hil

+abalones v. A - +(A 36

?d@ +upport and custodypendente lte

7 2- cf. 7 06, 7 64

angco v. (hode, !hil 00


29/58

28

%e la 'iFa v. 'illareal, 0 !hil

Araneta v. oncepcion 66 !hil 36

(amos v. 'amenta 02 +(A

)erma v. A 2 +(A 00

2. %efenses in actions for legal separation P 7 Art. 12

?a@ onsent

7 12?-@> 8

atubis v. !ra"edes, 6 !hil 346

!eople v. +ansano 1 !hil 3

!eople v. +chneckenberger 3 !hil 0

?b@ ondonation

7 12?@

5ine$ v. Bugayong !hil 22

?c@ (ecrimination

7 12?0@

Brown v. ambao - !hil 24

&ng vs &ng, 5.(. 8o. 1-2, &ctober -, -2

?d@ ollusion/utual onsent

7 2

7 12?@, ?1@, compare with 8 and --?@

Brown v. ambao, supra

&campo v. 7lorenciano 3 !hil 1

(epublic v A, 8ovember -, --

3. *ffects of decree of legal separation

?a@ &n personal relations, 7 2

?b@ &n the custody of children


30/58

30

7 2?@> 7 -

8 2?@

!.%. 2 ?W@ Art. 3 par.

atute v. acadaeg, 66 !hil 0, ay , 612

?c@ &n property relations

7 2?-@, 7 20, 7 Art. - ?0@, -6 ?3@


?d@ &n support, 7 64

?e@ &n the use of surname, 8 3-

)aperal v. (epublic 2 !hil 23-

?f@ &n hereditary rights, 7 2?0@

?g@ &ther *ffects, 7 20

?h@ +olo !arents Act P (A 463-

4. (econciliation, 7 2123

6. *ffect of death of one of the parties

)apu$ vs. *ufemio 0 +(A 0

acadangdang vs. A 4 +(A 0

'II. (I59T+ A8% &B)I5ATI&8+ &7 +!&C+*+

Tolentino 4 11

cf. 8 0

A. &bligation to love each other, 7 24


31/58

31

B. &bligation to live with the other spouse

. 5eneral rule and e"ceptions

7 24 P 3> 7 3-

Art. > -3> > -4

8 6- ?0@

(! ?-@

(! -03

(epublic v olina, 5.(. 8o. 432 7ebruary , 663

5oitia v. ampos(ueda, 1 !hils -1-

Arroyo v. 'as#uesArroyo 0- !hil 10

uaderno v. uaderno - +(A 11

Ilusorio vs. Bildner, 5.(. 8o. 6346. ay -, -.

-. %esignation of domicile

?a@ 5eneral rule: ointly

7 26 par. , compare with 8

Abella v. &*)*, - +(A 1

%e la 'iFa v. 'illareal, 0 !hil at pp. 2-

?b@ *"ception, 7 26 par. -

. Koint management of family life

7 3, 60 ?last par.@, - ?last par.@, --, 02

%. Koint &bligation to +upport

7 3, 60, 60 ?@, 60 ?last par.@, -, -- ?@, 02

+++ v %e los +antos, 5.(. 8o. 2036, August -6, -4

+++ v 7avila, 5.(. 8o. 361, arch -4, -

alderon vs (o"as, 5.(. 8o. 41161, Kan. 6, -


32/58

32

*. The right to e"ercise a profession or calling

7 3, compare with 8 3, (A 13- ?ay -0, -@

7 Art. 60 ?-@, ?@> 7 Art. - ?-@, ?@

Art. II +ec. 0 and Art. JIII +ec. 0, 643 onstitution

cf. 8 compare with (& (ule +ec. 0

cf.R.A. 71#2, ;An Act !romoting the Integration of Women as

7ull L *#ual !artners of en in %evelopment and 8ation

Building ?@> ?@

. !rior to marriage: modifications

7 > 7 32 ?modifications after marriage@

7 22, 23, -4, 1, 2


33/58

33

!ana vs. 9eirs of Kuanite, +r., 5.(. 8o. 20-,

%ecember , --

-. 7orm L registration re#uirement, 7 33, 8 13, 14,

8 36

. elebration of the marriage, 7 4 cf. Art. 42 ?@

B. !arties to a marriage settlement

?a@ minors, 7 34, 0, -, --1

?b@ persons under civil interdiction, 8 Art. 4, 6,

7 36, (! 0, 7 1 ?@?c@ incapacitated persons, 7 36, in rel. to 8 46

. Which law governs property relations, 7 30

. +tipulation in marriage settlements, 7 4

-. If both 7ilipinos

. i"ed marriage between 7ilipino and alien

0. If both aliens

1. 7or property located outside (!

7 4 ?-@ and ?@ in rel. to 8 2

7 4 ?@ in rel. To 8 3 ?@

%. %onationspropter nupta"

. %efinition, 7 4-

+olis v +olis, 1 !hil 6- D6-4E'elas#ue$ v A, 5.(. 8o. -2662. 7ebruary 1, -

Abobon v Abobon, 5.(. 8o. 114, August 1, --

-. 7orm of %onations, 7 Art. 4, 8 Arts. 304306

'alencia v )o#uiao, 5( --0, &ctober , -


34/58

34

%oronio v 9eirs, 5.(. 8o. 26010, %ecember -3, -3

. Who may be donors P 7 Art 4-, 4, 40

0. What may be donated by a spouse as donor

?a@ present property, 7 40, 3, 3-

?b@ future property, 7 40> 8 32

ateo vs )agua, -6 +(A 420

?c@ encumbered property, 7 41

?d@ donations in the marriage settlements, 7 4

1. 'oid donations by the spouses, 7 43

?a@ %onations during the marriage

hing v 5oyanko, 5( 21436, 8ovember , -2

?b@ %onations in common law marriages

atabuena v. ervantes 4 +(A -40

+++ v %avac, 5.(. 8o. )-20-. Kuly , 622

Bienvenido v. ourt of Appeals, -3 +(A 232

+umbad vs A, 4 (A 131

Arcaba vs. Tabancura vs. de Batocael, 5.(. 8o.

0224. 8ov. --, -

2. (evocation of donationspropter nupta", 7 4, 42?@

?a@ revocation by donor, 7 42> 8 321> 7 Art. 1> 0 ?@

ateo vs )agua, -6 +(A 420

?b@ by operation of law, 7 00> 2> 0 ?@


35/58

35

*. Absolute community of property ?A!@

. When applicable, 7 31, ?@> ?@> 6- ?@

-. ommencement, 7 44

. Waiver during marriage, 7 46 ?@ cf 8 24

0. Waiver after marriage, 7 46 par. -

1. +uppletory rules:

oownership, 7 6> of 8 0401

2. What constitutes A!, 7 6

?a@ All property at time of marriage

?b@ !roperty ac#uired subse#uently

?c@ Winnings from gambling, 7 61 cf 8 20

?d@ !resumption of A!, 7 6 of 8 2

uller v uller, 5.(. 8o. 0621, August -6, -2

Beumer v Amores, 5( 6123, %ecember , --

3. What is e"cluded from A!, 7 6-> 8ote: 7 0-

Abrenica v Abrenica, 5.(. 8o. 413-, Kune 4, --

4. harges upon A!, 7 60

)u$on +urety o., Inc. vs %e 5arcia, +(A 5elano vs A, +(A 6

5Tractors, Inc., vs A, 1 +(A 6-

?a@ 7amily e"penses cf. 7 ?@, 7 -?1@ and 7 60 ?@,

?0@, ?1@


36/58

3

7rancisco v 5on$ales, 5.(. 8o. 33223, +eptember 3,

-4

?b@ %ebts of spouses, Art. 60 ?-@ and ?@

?c@ +ubsidiary liabilities, Art. 60 ?6@

Buado vs. A, 5.(. 8o. 01---, April -0, -6

?d@ +ole obligations of a spouse, Art. 60

?e@ 5ambling losses, 7 61

?f@ &ther charges, Art. 60

6. &wnership, 7 6, 7 62 in rel. to 8 -2

. Administration and enoyment of A!

?a@ oint administration, 7 62> 7 6

%ar v )egasto, 5.(. 8o. 02, August , -

?b@ +ole administration

?@ incapacity, 7 62 ?-@ P no court order

Cy vs. A, 02 +(A -02

?-@ separation in fact 7 ?@, 0- P with court

order, of separate property

?@ abandonment, 7 P with court order

?1@ pendency of legal separation proceeding, 7

2 P with court order

?c@ %isposition and encumbrance, 7 6264

atthews vs. Taylor, 5( 20140, Kune --, -6

. *ffect of separation de +acto,7 > > cf. 7 -6

-. *ffect of abandonment, 7 , 7 3-, -6


37/58

36

. auses for dissolution of A!, 7 66

?a@ %eath, 7 cf. (ule 3 +ec. - (&


?b@ )egal separation, 7 2?-@> 7 22

?c@ Annulment and declaration of nullity, 7 1 in rel. to

7 0 ?-@, 03, 04

?d@ Kudicial separation of property, 7 04

Cgalde v sasi, 5( 2-, 7ebruary -6, -4

0. *ffects of dissolution

?a@ )i#uidation procedure, 7 -


?b@ 7or cause other than death, 7 0 ?-@> 7 2?-@> 03>

04

?c@ Termination due to death, 7

Buenaventura v A, 5.(. 8o. -314. arch , -1



1. 7or marriages before 7, 7 0 cf Art. ?@

%eli$o v. %eli$o, 26 +(A -2

2. +upport during A! li#uidation, 7 64, ?@

7. onugal partnership of gains

Belcodero v. A --3 +(A

+ps. *stonina v. A 5.(. 8o. 103, Kan. -3, 663


38/58

37

Ouiao v Ouiao, 5. (. 8o. 42--, Kuly 0, --&rpiano vs Tomas, 5.(. 8o. 342, Kan. 0, -

. When !5 commences and applies

?a@ arriages under 7, 7 3 cf. 7 44, 7 46

?b@ arriages before 7, 7 1?-@ of 7 -12

astro vs. iat, 63 +(A -3

?c@ When applicable, 7 1 of 7 3032, 3, 44, 46

?d@ +uppletory rules, 7 4 cf. 8 323324

-. What is included in the !5, 7 Art. 2, 3, 1, 4,

6, -

Titan v %avid, 5.(. 8o. 26104, arch 1, -

Imani vs. etrobank, 5.(. 8o. 43-, 8ov. 3, -.

%ewara v )amela, 5( 36, April , -

L! v. Eutable P 9an:, G.R. No. 183#18. Januar1, 201%.

. What is e"cluded from !5, 7 6

?a@ Brought as e"clusive property, 7 6?@

)aperal v. Gatigbak, +(A 06

7rancisco v A, 5.(. 8o. -, 8ov. -1, 664

Tan v Andrade, 5( 360, Aug 3, -

?b@ Ac#uired by gratuitous title during marriage,

7 6 ?-@ cf 7 , 7 0, 7 1, 8 1

'eloso v. artine$, -4 !hil -11


39/58

38

Berciles v. 5+I+,-4 +(A 1, cf. 7 1

?c@ Ac#uired by redemption/e"change, 7 6?@, 8

2, 26

!lata v. atco, - +(A 34

?d@ !urchased with e"clusive money, 7 6?0@> of 7

46

?e@ !roperties of parents

)aurena vs A, 5( 16--, +eptember --, -4

0. Administration of e"clusive property

?a@ By the spouseowner, 7

?b@ By the other spouse, 7 ?-@> 7 0-, 31, --3

R 'eloso v. artine$, -4 !hil -11

anotok (ealty v. A, 06 +(A 3-

&ng vs A, -0 +(A -63

1. *ncumbrance/disposition of e"clusive property

7 -, amended by (A 13-, 7 -2, amended

by (A 246

Wong et al. v. IA - +(A 36-

2. What constitutes !5

?a@ %efinition, 7 2?b@ !resumption of !5, 7 2

%ewara v )amela, 5( 36, April , -

%e )a !ena v Avila, 5.(. 8o. 4306, 7eb. 4, --



40/58

40

? c@ What are included in !5, 7 3, 1, 4, 6,

-

'illanueva vs A, 0-3 +(A 06

endo$a v. (eyes -0 +(A 10

Aguete v !8B, 5( 322, April 2, -

?d@ If property bought by installments, 7 Art. 4

Kovellanos v A, 5.(. 8o. 3-4 Kune 4, 66-

Tarrosa vs. %e )eon, 5( 412, Kuly -, -6

?e@ redits due, 7 6

?f@ Improvements on !5 property, 7 -

uno$, Kr. v (amire$, 5( 12-1, August -1, -

3. harges upon and obligations of !5, 7 -, --

ariano vs A, 30 +(A 16

Ayala vs A, -42 +(A -3-

hing vs A, 0- +(A 129omeowners vs. %ailo, 5.(. 8o. 14-, ar., -1

Ando v ampo, 5( 403, 7ebruary 2, -

?a@ With consent

5Tractors v. A, 1 +(A 6-

&ng v. A -0 +(A -63

Ayala Investment vs. A ?7ebruary -, 664@

+ecurity Bank vs. ar Tiera orp., 5.(. 8o. 04-,8ov. -6, -2


?b@ Without consent

ostuna vs. %omondon, 4 +(A


41/58

41

arlos vs. Abelardo, 4 +(A 2

'illanueva vs hiong, 5( 16446, Kune 1, -4

(avina v 'illaAbrille, 5( 8o. 234, &ct. 2, -6

7uentes v (oca, 5( 8o. 346-, April -, -

?c@ personal debts, 7 --,RP 108

!eople v. )agrimas, -6 +(A 1

Buado vs Buado, 5.(. 8o. 01---, April -0, -6

!ana vs. 9eirs of Kuanite, +r., 5.(. 8o. 20-,

%ecember , --

?d@ winnings from gambling, 7 -

4. &wnership, administration and enoyment

?a@ Koint administration, 7 -0 cf. 7 62, 0-

5uiang vs A, -6 +(A 3-

(o"as v. A 64 +(A 10 D66E

%ocena vs. )apesura, 11 +(A 214

Alinas vs Alinas, 5( 8o. 140, April 0, -4

Aggabao vs. !arulan, 5.(. 8o. 214, +ept. , -

?b@ +ole administration

?@ Incapacity, 7 -0, -3, -1

Cy vs. A, 02 +(A -02

?-@ +eparation in fact, 7 ?@, -3?@

?@ Abandonment, 7 , -4

R

?0@ !endency of legal separation proceedings, 7 2

+abalones v. A - +(A 36


42/58

42

?c@ %isposition and encumbrance, 7 -0-1> 7 63,

-

heeseman v. IA 6 +(A 6

7ren$el vs. atito, 5.(. 8o. 0614, Kuly , -

'illaranda vs. 'illaranda, 5.(. 8o. 1003, 7eb. -, -0

(avina v 'illaAbrille, 5( 8o. 234, &ct. 2, -6

+iochi v 5o$on, 5.(. 8o. 266, arch 4, -

7uentes vs. (oca, 5.(. 8o. 346-, April -, -


7lores v )indo, 5( 4640, April , -

6. *ffect of separation de +acto, 7 -3, 7 cf. 7 -6

. *ffect of abandonment, 7 -4 cf. 7

!artosaKo v. A -2 +(A 26

. %issolution of !5, 7 -2

?a@ %eath, 7 -2 ?@,


?b@ )egal separation, 7 2 ?-@, 7 22

?c@ Annulment and declaration of nullity, 7 1 in rel.

to 7 0 ?-@

?d@ Kudicial separation of property, 7 04


-. *ffects of dissolution, 7 -6

Tarrosa vs %e )eon, 5( 412, Kuly -, -6

abre$a v abre$a, 5( 3-2, +eptember , -6


43/58

43

?a@ )i#uidation procedure, 7 -6


?b@ ause other than death, 7 -6> 7 0?-@, 7 2?-@

?c@ termination due to death> 7 , cf. 7 0

. 7or marriages before 7, 7

0. Applicability of (ules of ourt, 7 -

1. +upport during !5 li#uidation, 7

+antero v. 7I, 1 +(A 3-4

5. (egime of separation of property

. When applicable

?a@ In the marriage settlements, 7 002

?b@ When mandatory, 7 L 7

?c@ (econciliation in legal separation, 7 22?-@?d@ Kudicial separation of property, 7 102


-. !roperty covered, 7 00

. Administration

?a@ By the ownerspouse, 7 01

?b@ By the other spouse, 7 0-, ?c@ 7 ?@>

0. 7amily e"penses, 7 02

1. onveyances between the spouses, 7 43, 8 06


44/58

44

9. Kudicial separation of property

. When possible, 7 0

a#uilan vs a#uilan, Kune 4, -3

-. 7or sufficient cause, 7 1, (! 0, cf. 7 11 ?@>

--6?0@, -, --


+ales v +ales, 5( 304, Kuly , -6

. 'oluntary separation of property, 7 2, 7 3031, 7 0

0. *ffects of udicial separation of property

?a@ li#uidation of !5 or A!, 7 3 par.

?b@ support pendente lite, 7 3 par. -

?c@ regime after K+!, 7 4 of 7 22 ?-@

?d@ binding effect on third parties, 7 60> of 7 22?-@

)aperal v Gatigbak, 2 !hil 23-

1. (evival of property regime after K+!, 7 0 cf. 7 23, 1,

0-

2. Transfer of administration of e"clusive property, 7 0- 7

62> 7 -0

I. !roperty regime of unions without marriage

Reve;: 7 2, 1 ?-@, 1 ?@, 1 ?1@, 2, 4, 1> 7 0, 00> 7 01?'oid and voidable marriages@

. Cnions under 7 03, 2, 1, 2, 1, cf. 8 00

'aldes v. O (T, 5.(. 8o. --306, Kuly , 662

arino vs. arino, 5( -16, 7ebruary , -


45/58

45

5on$ales vs 5on$ales, 034 +(A -3

%iFo v %iFo, 5( 340, Kanuary 6, -

Sala", Jr., v Agula, G.R. No. 202370, SEP 23 2013

-. Cnions under 7 04 of 7 1 in rel. to 7 06?-@ and 7

1, 3, 4, and 00

Bienvenido v. A -3 +(A 232

Agapay vs Agapay, -32 +(A 0

Tumlos vs. +ps. 7ernande$, 5.(. 8o. 321, Apr -, -

Adriano v A, -4 +(A 34

alilin vs astillo, +(A 2-4

'illanueva vs A, 0-3 +(A 06

Atien$a vs.de astro,5.(. 8o. 261264, 8ov. -6, -2+igney v +++, 5( 8o. 314-, Kan. -4, -4

Borromeo vs %escallar, 5( 8o. 16, 7eb. -0, -6

9eirs of aramag vs %e 5u$man, 5( 4-, Kune 1, -6

)acbayan v +amoy, 5.(. 8o. 210-3, arch -, - ?see K.

BrionNs +eparate &pinion@

5o Bangayan v Bangayan, 5.(. 8o. -2, Kuly , -

K. !roperty (elations of i"ed arriages

Borromeo vs %escallar, 5( 8o. 16, 7eb. -0, -6

heeseman v. IA 6 +(A 6

atthews vs. Taylor, 5( 20140, Kune --, -6

7ren$el vs. atito, 5.(. 8o. 0614, Kuly , -

uller v uller, 5.(. 8o. 0621, August -6, -2

!acific Ace v anagisawa, 5.(. 8o. 31, April , --

Beumer v Amores, 5( 6123, %ecember , --


46/58

4

IJ. 7AI) (*)ATI&8+

A. What governs family relations, 7 06, onstitution Art. II, +ec.

- and Art. J'

B. *ffects of family relationship on legal disputes

7 1 1

8 -1

(& (ule 2 +ec. ?@

(! -, -03 and -

5ayon v. 5ayon, 2 +(A 0

Wainwright v. 'erso$a, -2 +(A 34

agbaleta vs 5onong, 32 +(A 1Tribiana vs.Tribiana, 5.(. 8o. 316, +ept. , -0

9iyas +avings vs. AcuFa, 5.(. 8&. 10-, August , -2

)er" *+ $av", Sr. v Gonzale", et al., GR. No. 18#22, Jan. 1 201%

. The 7amily 9ome

. What constitutes the family home, 7 1-, 12, 2

-. Who may constitute the family home, 7 1-, 7 2

. When deemed constituted, 7 1

0. Beneficiaries, 7 10, 14, 6062, 66

!atricio vs. %ario, 5.(. 8o. 34-6, 8ovember -, -2

1. When terminated, 7 1 compare with 7 16

Arriola v Arriola, 5( 333, Kanuary -4, -4

2. *"emptions, 7 11, 7 13, 7 2

3. When may be sold, 7 14


47/58

46

9onrado v A, 5( 22, 8ov. -1, -1

abang vs Basay, 5( 8o. 4143, arch-, -6

7ortale$a v )apitan, 5( 34-44, August 1, --

4. (ights of creditors, 7 13, 22-

(amos v !angilinan, 5( 416-, Kuly -, -

*#uitable v &K ark, 5.(. 8o. 2161, August , -

%e esa v Acero, 5.(. 8o. 4120, Kanuary 2,--

J. !AT*(8IT A8% 7I)IATI&8

A. oncepts of paternity, filiation and legitimacy, 7 2

B. )egitimate children, 7 20 cf. 7 21 in rel to 8 -12-13,

22, 23, 24, 26

Angeles vs aglaya, 026 +(A 2

+++ vs. Aguas, 5.(. 21102, 7eb. -3, -2

(ivera vs 9eirs, 5( 8o. 01, Kuly -, -2

+untay v +untay, 5( 41, &ctober , --

. Who are considered legitimate children

?a@ onceived during marriage cf. (& (ule +ec.

?dd@, 7 Art. 24

. valid marriage

Arbolario v A, 5.(. 8o. -62, April --, -

ontinental +teel v ontano, &ct. , -6

-. terminated marriage under 7 0- in rel. to 7

0?@

. void marriages under 7 10

0. voidable marriages, 7 01


48/58

47

+untay v +untay, 5( -1-0, %ec. -6, 664

?b@ Born during marriage, 7 20

?c@ onceived by artificial insemination cf. 8 0,

7 20

?d@ Adopted children, (A 411-, +ec. 3

(ivera v (amire$, 5( 46263, Kune -3, --

?e@ )egitimated children, 33, 34

-. (ights of legitimate children, 7 330

8 20, 30, 328 444, 8 636

oore v. (epublic, 4 +(A -4-

8aldo$a v. (epublic, - +(A 214

&ng vs A, -3- +(A 3-1

(ep. vs A, +(A 4

. Illegitimate children

. Who are considered illegitimate

?a@ under 8

?b@ under 7 21

Cy v hua, 5.(. 8o. 4621, +eptember 4, -6

-. (ights of illegitimate children, 7 3, 3-, 3132

&smeFa de 'alencia v. (odrigue$, 40 !hil ---

Briones vs. iguel, 00 +(A 011, &ctober 4, -0aramag vs %e 5u$man, 5( 4-, Kune 1, -6

%e la ru$ vs 5racia, 5.(. 8o. 333-4, Kuly , -6anungas v )oreto, 5( 62, August --, -

5otardo v Buling, 5( 2122, August 1, --


49/58

48

Grande v Antono, G.R. No. 2042%8, $ebruar 18, 201%

%. Action to impugn legitimacy

(eyes vs. auricio,5.(. 8o. 314, 8ovember -0, -

. 5rounds, 7 22

?a@ !hysical impossibility of access

Andal v. acaraig, 46 !hil 21

acadangdang v. A, +(A 3

oncepcion vs. A, 5.(. 8o. -01, Aug. , -1

?b@ Biological or other scientific grounds

A.. 8o. 21+ ?(C)* &8 %8A *vidence@

7 3, 3

Agustin, Kune 1, -1

9errera vs. Alba, 5.(. 8o. 04--, Kune 1, -1

*state v. %ia$, 5.(. 8o. 33, %ec. 3, -3

)ucas v )ucas, 5( 8o. 63, Kune 2, -

?c.@ 7 22?@

-. *ffect of a motherNs declaration, 7 23

hua Geng 5iap v. IA, 14 +(A 4

. In subse#uent marriages, 7 24, 26

!eople v Ouitoriano, Kanuary -, 663

0. !resumptions, 7 3, 3

1. !rescription of action to impugn legitimacy


50/58

50

5aspay v. A, -4 +(A 2

2. Who may impugn

Benite$Badua v. A, --6 +(A 024

)iyao, Kr. vs. Tanhoti)iyao, 34 +(A 12

(epublic v agpayo, 5( 46032, 7eb. -, -

*. !roof of 7iliation

. &f legitimate children, 7 3-3

%ia$ vs. ourt of Appeals, -6 +(A 2-, Kune --, 640Tison vs. ourt of Appeals, -32 +(A 14-, Kuly , 663

Trinidad vs. ourt of Appeals, -46 +(A 44, April -, 6649eirs of onti v A, 5.(. 8o. 4020, %ecember -, 664

%e Kesus vs. *state of Kuan 5amboa %i$on, 22 +(A 066

-. &f illegitimate children, 7 31

Kison vs. A, -42 +(A 061

9eirs of 5abatan vs A, 5( 1-2, arch , -6

%ela ru$ , et al vs. 5racia, 5.(. 8o. 333-4, Kuly , -6

)ucas v )ucas, 5.(. 8o. 63, Kune 2, -

5otardo v Buling, 5( 2122, August 1, --

!erla v Baring, 5( 3-03, 8ovember -, --

. (ights of illegitimate children, 7 32

0. ompulsory recognition, cf. (! 01

!eople v Abella, 5.(. 8o. 33-61, Kanuary 2, -

7. )egitimated hildren

. who may be legitimated, 7 33, (A 6414

Abadilla vs Tabiliran, -06 +(A 003


51/58

51

-. 9ow legitimation takes place, 7 34, 7 4

. (etroactivity and effects, 7 44

0. Action to impugn legitimation, 7 4-

1. (ights of legitimated children, 7 36

JI. A%&!TI&8

)a$atin v. ampos, 6- +(A -1

ervantes v. 7aardo, 26 +(A 131

R.A. 82?%omestic Adoption )aw@A.. 8o. -2-+.. ?Aug. --, --@

A. (e#uisites to be an adopter

. Age and capacity re#uired P +ec. 3

-. 9usband and wife ointly P +ec. 3

ichelle )im, 5( 2466-, ay -, -6

. 8eed for consent P +ec. 6

)andingin vs. (!, 5.(. 8o. 20604, Kune -3, -2

0. Aliens as adopters P +ec. 3 ?b@

(epublic v. Toledano, - +(A 6

(.A. 40, ;The )aw on Interountry Adoption 7 466> Art. 6, !% 2,

(ule 66, +ection 1

+ee: Balane, (uben,Jottng" n Succe""on,D-2 ed.E

0. &n name

In the atter of Adoption of +tephanie 5arcia, 010

+(A 10

9. (escission of adoption, +ec. 6

)ahom vs. +ibulo, 5.(. 8o. 0646, Kuly 0, -

. by the adopted


53/58

53

-. by the adopter/s

. effects of rescission, +ec. -

JII. +C!!&(T

A. What comprises support, 7 60

B. Who are obliged to provide support, 7 61, 62

!elayo v. )auron, - !hil 01

+anche$ v. Hulueta, 24 !hil

%e Asis vs. A, 5.(. 8o. -3134, 7eb. 1, 666

(ondina v !eople, 5( 3616, Kune , --

5otardo v Buling, 5( 2122, August 1, --!erla v Baring, 5( 3-03, 8ovember -, --


)im)ua v )ua, 5.(. 8os. 31-364, Kune 1, -

. +ource of support,7 6364, cf. 7 06, 3, 60, -, --

)erma v. A, 2 +(A 00

(eyes vs Ines)uciano, 44 +(A 4

%. &rder of support, 7 66, -, -0

angonon vs. A, 5.(. 8o. -10, Kune , -2

+pouses )im v )im, 5.(. 8o. 2-6, &ctober , -6

*. anner and time of payment, 7 --0


F+ Amount of support, 7 --4

)acson vs. )acson, 5.(.8o. 1200, August -4, -2


54/58

54

+ (enunciation and Termination, 8 -1> 7 60> 8 1-

?read Tolentino@

;+ +upportpendente lte,7 64> (ules of ourt, (ule 2

I. !rocedure in applications for support, (ule 2

JIII. !A(*8TA) ACT9&(IT L C+T&% &7 9I)%(*8

A. oncept of parental authority, Art. II, +ec. -, 643 onstitution,

7 -6, -, 8 122

edina vs. akabali, -3 +(A 1-, arch -4, 626Cnson vs. 8avarro, +(A 4, 8ovember 3, 64

)abea" orpu" *+ 6nor S&ang 'o Vng"on v abcaban,


55/58

55

'ancil vs Belmes, 14 +(A 33

*. +pecial !A

7 -4-6, 7 -

cf. 7 -- in rel. to 8 -4

ybercrime !revention Act, (A 31, +eptember -, --

+t. aryNs Academy vs. arpitanos, 5.(. 8o. 02,

7ebruary 2, --

hild )earning entre vs. Tagario, 5( 16-, 8&'. -1, -1

+chool of the 9oly +pirit vs. Taguiam, 5( 21121, Kuly 0,

-4

A#uinas +chool v Inton, 5( 40--, Kanuary -2, -

7. 7ilialprivilege, 7 -1

(& (ule +ec. -1 cf. +ecs. -- L -

)ee v A, 5( 3342, Kuly , -

5. *ffects of !A over the childNs person,

7 -----

7 ----0

uadra v. onfort, 1 +(A 2

(.A. 32,The hild Abuse )aw

9. *ffects of !A over the childNs property,

7 --1--3,(A 6-, +ecs. -B and -

9ebron vs. )oyola, 5.(. 8o. 2462, Kuly 1, -

8eri v 9eirs, 5( 6022, &ctober , --

I. +uspension or termination of !A


56/58

5

. permanent termination, 7 --4, --, cf. (A 246

-. nonpermanent termination, 7 --6 cf. 7 6

+ecs. 2 and 6, (A 411- re parental authority and revocation

of adoption

. suspension of !A, 7 --, -

hua v. abangbang, -3 +(A 36

%e 5u$man vs !ere$, 062 +(A 030

0. revival

+ee: (.A. 426, ;An Act *stablishing 7amily ourts, 5ranting Them

*"clusive &riginal Kurisdiction &ver hild and 7amily ases.

Documents

Outline in Family Law 2014