1
Outcome of Pets Adopted During a Waived-Fee Adoption Event: Maddie’s Matchmaker Adoptathon Sandra MacArthur, BS; Julie K. Levy, DVM, PhD, DACVIM; Patricia A. Dingman, MS, Sylvia J. Tucker, BS Maddie’s Shelter Medicine Program, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida Animal shelters can reduce shelter euthanasia by increasing the number and speed of pet adoptions. Improving adoption efficiency can control the number of pets in shelters at any given time, resulting in less crowding, stress, operating costs, staff fatigue, and risk of infectious disease transmission in the shelter. . Campaigns to increase shelter pet adoptions by reducing or eliminating adoption fees are controversial due to concern they may increase risk of poor care or abandonment. However, little data exist to correlate the payment of a fee with adoption success. The purpose of this study was to assess the outcome of pets adopted during a waived-fee adoption event in the San Francisco Bay Area in June 2011. Survey Instrument A survey regarding the adoption experience was sent to all 1,928 pet adopters. Pet and owner characteristics and pet lifestyle were compared between adopters who still had their pets 6-12 months post-adoption and those who did not. For each pet adoption, the following information was collected: Pet demographics Adopter demographics Adoption experience Pet medical/behavior conditions Pet lifestyle Data Collection and Analysis Survey responses were audited for completeness and internal consistency as they were submitted. Respondents were contacted for clarification if necessary. The results for dogs and cats were evaluated separately. Pet lifestyle and healthcare were compared between adopters who retained and did not retain their pets using the Chi square test, and odds rations and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. P<0.05 was considered significant. The vast majority of pets adopted without a fee remained in the home. Owners of both retained and non-retained pets reported high attachment and integrated pets into their homes, suggesting that successful adoptions do not require payment of a fee. Free adoption promotions may increase adoptions without compromising quality of life. 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% Male Female 21 and Under (92-under 22-34 (91-78) 35-44 (77-68) 45-54 (67-58) 55-64 (57-48) 65 and Over (47) 0 1 2 3 More than 3 0 1 2 3 4 More than 4 0 1 2 More than 2 Under 15,000 15,000-24,999 25,000-34,999 35,000-49,999 49,999-74,999 75,000-99,999 100,000-149,999 150,000-199,999 Over 200,000 Gender Age Number of Children in the Home Number of Cats in Home Prior to Adopting Number of Dogs in Home Prior to Adopting Annual Household Income Percent of Adopters Adopter Demographics Cat Adopters (n=470) Dog Adopters (n=334) Weiss, E., Gramann, S. (2009). A Comparison of Attachment Levels of Adopters of Cats: Fee- Based Adoptions Versus Free Adoptions. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 12:360- 70. Wilson, J., Levy, J., Scott, H.M., Zeidman, S. (2011). Adoption Fee Amount and Other Factors Associated with Pet Adoption Success. The authors would like to thank Maddie’s Fund ® for supporting this project. Maddie’s ® Shelter Medicine Program is underwritten by a grant from Maddie’s Fund ® , the Pet Rescue Foundation (www.maddiesfund.org), helping to fund the creation of a no-kill nation. 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% Very Strong Strong Moderate Weak Very Weak Percent of Adopters Attachment Level Attachment Level Reported by Adopters In Home Dogs In Home Cats Not in Home Dogs Not in Home Cats 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Wears a Collar with Contact Information Microchipped Visited Veterinarian Receives Flea Treatment Receives Heartworm Prevention Attended Training Classes Percent of Pets Type of Healthcare Post-Adoption Healthcare of Adopted Pets In Home Cats (n=796) In Home Dogs (n=418) Not In Home Cats (n=41) Not In Home Dogs (n=32) Return to Shelter 37% In New Home 32% Disappeare d or Ran Away 2% Euthanized or Pased Away 29% Outcome of Cats No Longer in Home Return to Shelter 31% In New Home 35% Disappeare d or Ran Away 6% Euthanized or Pased Away 28% Outcome of Dogs No Longer in Home A total of 57% of adopters completed the survey, reporting that 95% of cats and 93% of dogs were still in the home. Strong or very strong attachment to the pet was reported by 94% of adopters. Pets were no longer in the home due to return to the shelter (1.8% cats; 2.2% dogs), rehoming (1.6%; 2.4%), death (1.4%; 2.0%), or going missing (0.1%; 0.4%). Most pets lived predominantly indoors (95%; 93%), slept on the family bed (62%; 44%), and had been to a veterinarian (74%; 87%). There were no significant differences between the two groups based on pet attachment level, post- adoption lifestyle or healthcare, or perception of the adoption event.

Outcome of Pets Adopted During a Waived-Fee Adoption …...Pet and owner characteristics and pet lifestyle were compared between adopters who still had their pets 6-12 months post-adoption

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    6

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Outcome of Pets Adopted During a Waived-Fee Adoption …...Pet and owner characteristics and pet lifestyle were compared between adopters who still had their pets 6-12 months post-adoption

Outcome of Pets Adopted During a Waived-Fee Adoption Event: Maddie’s Matchmaker Adoptathon

Sandra MacArthur, BS; Julie K. Levy, DVM, PhD, DACVIM; Patricia A. Dingman, MS, Sylvia J. Tucker, BS

Maddie’s Shelter Medicine Program, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida

Animal shelters can reduce shelter euthanasia by increasing the number and speed of pet adoptions. Improving adoption efficiency can control the number of pets in shelters at any given time, resulting in less crowding, stress, operating costs, staff fatigue, and risk of infectious disease transmission in the shelter.. Campaigns to increase shelter pet adoptions by reducing or eliminating adoption fees are controversial due to concern they may increase risk of poor care or abandonment. However, little data exist to correlate the payment of a fee with adoption success. The purpose of this study was to assess the outcome of pets adopted during a waived-fee adoption event in the San Francisco Bay Area in June 2011.

Survey Instrument

A survey regarding the adoption experience was sent to all 1,928 pet adopters. Pet and owner characteristics and pet lifestyle were compared between adopters who still had their pets 6-12 months post-adoption and those who did not. For each pet adoption, the following information was collected:

• Pet demographics • Adopter demographics • Adoption experience • Pet medical/behavior conditions • Pet lifestyle

Data Collection and Analysis

Survey responses were audited for completeness and internal consistency as they were submitted. Respondents were contacted for clarification if necessary. The results for dogs and cats were evaluated separately. Pet lifestyle and healthcare were compared between adopters who retained and did not retain their pets using the Chi square test, and odds rations and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. P<0.05 was considered significant.

• The vast majority of pets adopted without a fee

remained in the home. • Owners of both retained and non-retained pets

reported high attachment and integrated pets into their homes, suggesting that successful adoptions do not require payment of a fee.

• Free adoption promotions may increase adoptions

without compromising quality of life.

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

Mal

e

Fem

ale

21 a

nd U

nder

(92-

unde

r

22-3

4 (9

1-78

)

35-4

4 (7

7-68

)

45-5

4 (6

7-58

)

55-6

4 (5

7-48

)

65 a

nd O

ver (

47) 0 1 2 3

Mor

e th

an 3 0 1 2 3 4

Mor

e th

an 4 0 1 2

Mor

e th

an 2

Unde

r 15,

000

15,0

00-2

4,99

9

25,0

00-3

4,99

9

35,0

00-4

9,99

9

49,9

99-7

4,99

9

75,0

00-9

9,99

9

100,

000-

149,

999

150,

000-

199,

999

Over

200

,000

Gender Age Number of Children in theHome

Number of Cats in Home Prior toAdopting

Number of Dogs inHome Prior to

Adopting

Annual Household Income

Perc

ent o

f Ado

pter

s

Adopter Demographics

Cat Adopters (n=470) Dog Adopters (n=334)

Weiss, E., Gramann, S. (2009). A Comparison of Attachment Levels of Adopters of Cats: Fee-Based Adoptions Versus Free Adoptions. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 12:360-70. Wilson, J., Levy, J., Scott, H.M., Zeidman, S. (2011). Adoption Fee Amount and Other Factors Associated with Pet Adoption Success.

The authors would like to thank Maddie’s Fund® for supporting this project. Maddie’s® Shelter Medicine Program is underwritten by a grant from Maddie’s Fund®, the Pet Rescue Foundation (www.maddiesfund.org), helping to fund the creation of a no-kill nation.

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

Very Strong Strong Moderate Weak Very Weak

Perc

ent o

f Ado

pter

s

Attachment Level

Attachment Level Reported by Adopters

In Home Dogs

In Home Cats

Not in Home Dogs

Not in Home Cats

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No

Wears a Collar with ContactInformation

Microchipped Visited Veterinarian Receives Flea Treatment Receives Heartworm Prevention Attended Training Classes

Perc

ent o

f Pet

s

Type of Healthcare

Post-Adoption Healthcare of Adopted Pets In Home Cats (n=796) In Home Dogs (n=418) Not In Home Cats (n=41) Not In Home Dogs (n=32)

Return to Shelter

37%

In New Home 32%

Disappeared or Ran

Away 2%

Euthanized or Pased

Away 29%

Outcome of Cats No Longer in Home

Return to Shelter

31%

In New Home 35%

Disappeared or Ran

Away 6%

Euthanized or Pased

Away 28%

Outcome of Dogs No Longer in Home

• A total of 57% of adopters completed the survey, reporting that 95% of cats and 93% of dogs were still in the home.

• Strong or very strong attachment to the pet was reported by 94% of adopters.

• Pets were no longer in the home due to return to the shelter (1.8% cats; 2.2% dogs), rehoming (1.6%; 2.4%), death (1.4%; 2.0%), or going missing (0.1%; 0.4%).

• Most pets lived predominantly indoors (95%; 93%), slept on the family bed (62%; 44%), and had been to a veterinarian (74%; 87%).

• There were no significant differences between the two groups based on pet attachment level, post-adoption lifestyle or healthcare, or perception of the adoption event.