OUR GOAL IS TO BE THE BEST BUILDER IN AMERICA.

High Performance TeamingPresenters:Bob BetzSenior Vice President – McCarthy Building Companies, Inc.

Dan Fauchier, CMFSenior Lean Coach – The ReAlignment Group

Commonly Asked Questions

1. Will I be able to get copies of the slides after the event?

2. Is this web seminar being recorded so I or others can view it after the fact?

NOYESü

NOYESü

Have A Question?

How to submit questions to the Speaker during this Web Cast

Click on your Pop-Down Tool Bar

4

Agenda

• Introductions• What is High Performance Teaming?• UCSD Biomedical Research Facility II

– Why and How?

• Results • Metrics• Takeaways• Final Assessment• Q&A

WHAT IS HIGH PERFORMANCE TEAMING?

High Performance Teaming

5

6

What is High Performance Teaming?

• Moving from vertical silos

• To Horizontal Teams– Executive– Manager– Field

Level 1 Thinking - Personal/Professional

Level 2 Thinking - Business/Organizational

Contracts

Owner Contractor

Designer

Fort Mentality

Level 3 Thinking - Project First Thinking

3rd Level Focus

Always Asking First: “What’s Best

for the Project?”

HPT allows teams to…

• Focus on tasks at hand• Forecast risks• Forecast opportunities• Manage systems• Encourage professionalism• Encourage collaboration• Quickly resolve inevitable conflicts

11

What is High Performance Teaming?

• Quickly resolve inevitable conflicts

SimplifySimplifySimplify

Resolve issues at the lowest level

Elevate unresolved issues quickly through a simple 3-tier process

OLD WAY

NEW WAY

12

High Performance TeamingFie

ld T

eam

can

not

Resolv

e

13

The 5 Big Ideas

Collaborate;Really Collaborate

Networks ofCommitment

Tightly CoupleLearning w/ Action

OptimizeThe Whole

IncreaseRelatedness

Courtesy LCI

UCSD BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH FACILITY II

High Performance Teaming

14

15

UCSD Biomedical Research Facility II

• 200K sf, 5-story Research Laboratory + 7-story Office wing, LEED Platinum, completed 2013

• Owner: UCSD• Builder: McCarthy Building Companies, Inc.• Designer: ZGF Architects• Facilitator: The ReAlignment Group• Procurement: CM/GC; Select Bid - Fee/GC’s

16

UCSD Biomedical Research Facility II

• Incorporated techniques and strategies from:– Integrated Project Delivery– Design-Build– Design Assist

• Promoted a collaborative delivery model− Facilitated a seamless transition from Preconstruction to

Construction

• Lean Construction theory– Informed the processes– New, more collaborative and reliable partnering model– Utilized pull planning for collaborative scheduling

17

Pull Planning the MEPs

QUARTERLY PRE-SESSIONONLINE SURVEYS

High Performance Teaming

18

19

Pre-Session Surveys

20

Pre-Session Surveys

QUARTERLY HPT SESSIONS(FACILITATED)

High Performance Teaming

21

22

Session Agenda

• Introductions + What surprised you most in the last 90 days?

• What’s Working? What’s Not Working?– In vertical silo teams– From survey, plus live discussion – pick top 3 & report

• Identify Risks and Opportunities– In horizontal teams: Executive, Manager, Field

• Top 4 Risks, Mitigation Strategies & Action Items• Trust Assessment• Plus / Delta• Takeaways

23

Start as Whole Group, then break out into Silo Teams

What’s Working? What’s NOT Working?

24

Then flip to Horizontal Teams

• Executive– Across all the Silos– UCSD– McCarthy– ZGF– Major Trades

25

Horizontal Teams: Risks & Opps

• Manager– Across all the Silos– UCSD– McCarthy– ZGF– All Trades– Inspectors

26

Horizontal Teams: Top 4 Risks

• Field Team– Across all the Silos– UCSD– McCarthy Sup’t– ZGF (on site)– All Trades

27

Break out into Issue Groups

28

“Live Notes” become Report

29

Goals Progress

30

Risks & Opportunities

31

Top 4 Risks/Issues & Action Items

32

Plus / Delta

33

Takeaways

RESULTSHigh Performance Teaming

34

35

Results

• 6 Quarterly Meetings of 50, then 40, then 30• Individual horizontal team meetings throughout

– Removed one problem individual – mutual agreement

• High Performance Teaming benefits all stakeholders:– Owner’s management team– Facilities personnel– End users– Architect– Contractor– Consultants– Trade subcontractors

METRICSHigh Performance Teaming

36

37

Trust Assessment

8.19

Team Members’ Trust Levels

5/1/

11

6/1/

11

7/1/

11

8/1/

11

9/1/

11

10/1

/11

11/1

/11

12/1

/11

1/1/

12

2/1/

12

3/1/

12

4/1/

12

5/1/

12

6/1/

120

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Series1

Steady in the 8’s

5 6 7 8 9 100

10

20

30

40

50

Team Members’ Trust Levels

TAKEAWAYSHigh Performance Teaming

40

41

Takeaways

• Finished on time, on budget, Platinum quality• Open communication throughout the entire

project between all levels of the Team• Pull planning was an excellent compliment to the

to HPT process – Facilitated field collaboration• Change resolution uneventful• All issues resolved at the Management/Field Level

of the project• Goal setting by each HPT Group raised the bar on

performance for the project

FINAL ASSESSMENTHigh Performance Teaming

42

43

Final Assessment

• Using High Performance Teaming– Owner realizes quantitative results

• Performance enhancements• Delivery of high quality• Meet a fast-track schedule• Collaborative budget control – target value budgeting• Maintain safe jobsite• Foster camaraderie amongst all team members

• Drives all project participants to “Project First” thinking– Streamlining team focus on– What’s ultimately best for the project.

Questions and answers

Have A Question?

How to submit questions to the Speaker during this Web Cast

Click on your Pop-Down Tool Bar

46

Following Today’s Web Cast

Watch your inbox for directions on where to go for downloading today’s presentation and recording.

To contact:Bob Betz

rbetz@mccarthy.comDan Fauchier

dan@projectrealign.com

OUR GOAL IS TO BE THE BEST BUILDER IN AMERICA.

High Performance TeamingPresenters:Bob BetzSenior Vice President – McCarthy Building Companies, Inc.

Dan Fauchier, CMFSenior Lean Coach – The ReAlignment Group