Upload
julian-patterson
View
25
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
OSEP Personnel Development Program. Welcome! Program Meeting July 18, 2011. Program Performance Measure Results 2010 Using the Louisiana Data Longitudinal System to Improve Teacher Preparation Discussions on Program Improvement. Agenda. Discussions ( 4:00 -5:30). - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Welcome! PROGRAM MEETING
July 18, 2011
OSEP Personnel Development
Program
1
Agenda
Program Performance Measure Results 2010
Using the Louisiana Data Longitudinal System to Improve Teacher Preparation
Discussions on Program Improvement
Grant Priority or Focus Room Number
LeadershipLow IncidenceEarly ChildhoodRelated ServicesSecondary
TransitionHigh Incidence Paraprofessional
Washington 2Washington 4Washington 5Madison BBalcony AWashington 6Balcony B
Discussions (4:00-5:30)
Summer 2011 Doctoral Interns
University of Central FloridaUniversity of Massachusetts –
AmherstUniversity of North TexasUniversity of South
FloridaClemson UniversityUniversity of Northern Colorado
GOAL To prepare personnel in areas of critical need who are highly qualified to improve outcomes for children with disabilities
5
PDP Investments
Program Improvement
Program Improvement
Preparation National Centers
Program Evaluation
Program Evaluation
5
Program Objectives
Objective 1. Improve the curricula of IDEA training programs to ensure that personnel preparing to serve children with disabilities are knowledgeable and skilled in practices that reflect the current knowledge base. Objective 2. Increase the supply of teachers and service providers who are highly qualified for and serve in positions for which they are trained. Objective 3. Enhance the efficiency of the expenditure of Federal dollars under this program
Program Improvement
Training on - Preparing Annual Performance
ReportsUsing Logic ModelsWriting Performance MeasuresImproving Performance
Measurement Data Quality FY 2011 Priority Submission
Requirements
As required by the Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) of 1993, OSEP has developed a strategic plan for measuring performance and will collect information to assess progress and performance.(P. A-3, FY 2011 325D, 325K, 325T Appl icat ion Package)
Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA)
Performance Measure 1 Percentage of projects that incorporate
evidence-based practices into their curricula.
20072008
20092010
0102030405060708090
100
41.555.5
48.7
91.3
Performance Measure 2Percentage of scholars completing OSEP- funded training programs who are knowledgeable and
skilled in evidence based practices for infants, toddlers, children, and youth with disabilities.
20062007
20082009
2010
05
1015202530354045
43.539.1
40.6
Performance Measure 3Percentage of program scholars who exit preparation programs prior to completion due to poor academic
performance
20062007
20082009
2010
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3 3
1.82
1.41.6
Performance Measure 4Percentage of funded degree/certification program recipients who are working in the area(s) in which they were trained upon program
completion.
20062007
20082009
2010
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
8075.3
69.469.7 73.273.4
Performance Measure 5 Percentage of funded degree/certification program recipients who are working in the area(s) in which they were trained upon program
completion and who are fully qualified under IDEA.
20062007
20082009
2010
01020304050607080
70.265.3
69
CHALLENGES: HQT status is determined by LEA teacher assignment. Therefore extreme caution must be used when drawing conclusions about the program, because data may represent economic conditions rather than PDP program quality. Consider providing TA on teacher assignments to targeted states.
Performance Measure 7 The Federal cost per degree/certification program recipient who completed the program.
20072008
20092010
23000
23500
24000
24500
25000
25500
23,763
25,12324,774
24,418