Upload
vutram
View
220
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Okeson AAO May 3, 2016
1
byJeffrey P Okeson, DMD
Professor and Chief, Division of Orofacial PainDirector, Orofacial Pain Program
University of Kentucky College of DentistryLexington, Kentucky 40536-0297
Orthodontic Therapy and TMD: An Update
The American Association of OrthodontistsOrlando, Florida
May 3, 2016
Orthodontic Therapy and TMD: An Update
?
Temporomandibular Disorders
Musculoskeletal pain disorders
of the masticatory system. 1. Does orthodontic therapy lead to an increase in Temporomandibular Disorder symptoms?
2. What causes Temporomandibular Disorder?3. What are the functional treatment goals of
orthodontic therapy?4. When should you consider orthodontic therapy for
the treatment of a Temporomandibular Disorder?5. Can orthodontic therapy prevent TMD?
Some important questions for us to consider.
- let’s ask some specific questions -
1. Does orthodontic therapy lead to an increase in TMD symptoms?
Orthodontic therapy and TMD- a data based review -
Sadowsky & BeGole, 1980 75 75 10 years no significant differences
Sadowsky & Polson, 1984 96 103 10 years no significant differences
Larsson & Ronnerman, 1981 23 HI 10 years no significant differences
Dahl et al, 1988 51 47 5 years no sign differences (- pat)
Smith & Freer, 1989 87 28 4 years no sign differences (+ pat)
Rendell et al, 1992 462 HI 18 mons no significant differences
Hirata et al, 1992 102 41 2 years no significant differences
Kremenak et al, 1992 109 HI 1-6 years no significant differences
Wadhwa et al, 1993 31 71 4 years no significant differences
Henrikson et al, 2000 65 60 2 years no significant differences
TMD Signs and Symptoms: Post-Ortho vs Controls
Authors # pat # controls years results
Okeson AAO May 3, 2016
2
- let’s ask some specific questions -
1. Does orthodontic therapy lead to an increase in TMD symptoms?
2. Does premolar extraction increase the incidence of TMD symptoms?
Orthodontic therapy and TMD- a data based review -
Janson & Hasund, 1981 30 30 5 years no significant differences
Sadowsky et al., 1991 87 68 3 years no significant differences
Luppanapornlarp, 1993 33 29 15 years no significant differences
Kremenak et al, 1992 39 26 1-2 years no significant differences
Dibbets et al, 1992 73 38 20 years no significant differences
Extraction vs. Non Extraction and Various TMD Symptoms
Authors # ex pat # non ex years results
- let’s ask some specific questions -
1. Does orthodontic therapy lead to an increase in TMD symptoms?
2. Does premolar extraction increase the incidence of TMD symptoms?
3. Does premolar extraction resulting in posterior displacement of condyles?
Orthodontic therapy and TMD- a data based review -
Gianelly et al, 1988 30 37 no significant differences
Luecke et al,1992 42 --- 70 % more forward after tx
Beattie et al, 1994 33 30 no significant differences
Artun et al, 1992 29 34 Mixed: Right mid & lat all other areas no sign diff
O’Reilly et al, 1993 60 60 no significant differences
Extraction vs. Non Extraction and Posterior Displacement of the Condyle
Authors # ex pat # non ex results
- let’s ask some specific questions -
1. Does orthodontic therapy lead to an increase in TMD symptoms?
2. Does premolar extraction increase the incidence of TMD symptoms?
3. Does premolar extraction resulting in posterior displacement of condyles?
4. Does orthodontic therapy prevent TMD?
Orthodontic therapy and TMD- a data based review -
Sadowsky & BeGole, 1980 75 75 10 years no significant differences
Sadowsky & Polson, 1984 96 103 10 years no significant differences
Larsson & Ronnerman, 1981 23 HI 10 years no significant differences
Dahl et al, 1988 51 47 5 years no sign differences (- pat)
Smith & Freer, 1989 87 28 4 years no sign differences (+ pat)
Rendell et al, 1992 462 HI 18 mons no significant differences
Hirata et al, 1992 102 41 2 years no significant differences
Kremenak et al, 1992 109 HI 1-6 years no significant differences
Wadhwa et al, 1993 31 71 4 years no significant differences
Henrikson et al, 2000 65 60 2 years no significant differences
Authors # pat # controls years results
Does Orthodontic Therapy Prevent TMD Symptoms
Okeson AAO May 3, 2016
3
These studies suggest that orthodontic therapy is not a risk factor for TMD.
Is that true?
…..or are there other factors that may need to be considered regarding the
results of these studies?
Some considerations regarding the conclusions of these studies
1. The studies are true, there is no relationship between orthodontic therapy and TMD.
2. The studies have only looked at well controlled orthodontic therapy.
3. The studies looked at young, growing, adaptive patients.
4. Orthodontic therapy does affect occlusion but….…. the relationship between occlusion and TMD is unclear.
1. Does orthodontic therapy lead to an increase in Temporomandibular Disorder symptoms?
2. What causes Temporomandibular Disorder?3. What are the functional treatment goals of
orthodontic therapy?4. When should you consider orthodontic therapy for
the treatment of a Temporomandibular Disorder?5. Can orthodontic therapy prevent TMD?
Some important questions for us to consider.
Normal functioning masticatory system
Etiologic Factors
TMD
Occlusal Factors
The asymptomatic individual
The Role of Occlusion in Temporomandibular Disorders
Occlusion
TM Disorders
=
?
?
=
Our history
Evidence based Dentistry
I reviewed the findings of78 epidemiologic studies that investigated the
relationship betweenocclusal factors and TMD symptoms.
Pub Med search from 1979 - 2008
Opinion ? or Data ?
Okeson AAO May 3, 2016
4
Williamson and Simmons, 1979DeBoever and Adriaens, 1983Egermark-Eriksson et al., 1983
Gazit et al., 1984Brandt, 1985
Nesbitt et al., 1985Thilander, 1985
Budtz-Jorgenson et al., 1985Bernal and Tsamtsouris, 1986
Nilner, 1986Stringert and Worms, 1986
Riolo et al., 1987Kampe et al., 1987
Kampe and Hannerz, 1987Gunn et al., 1988
Pullinger, et al., 1988Seligman and Pullinger, 1989
Linde and Isacsson, 1990 Dworkin et al., 1990Kampe et al., 1991Steele et al., 1991
Takenoshita et al., 1991Pullinger and Seligman, 1991Wänman and Agerberg, 1991
Cacchiotti et al., 1991Kampe et al., 1991Steele et al., 1991
Takenoshita et al., 1991Pullinger and Seligman, 1991Wänman and Agerberg, 1991
Cacchiotti et al., 1991Egermark and Thilander, 1992
Shiau and Chang, 1992Glaros et al., 1992
Huggare and Raustia, 1992Kirveskari et al., 1992
Könönen, 1992Könönen et al., 1992
List and Helkimo, 1992Shian and Chang, 1992
Al Hadi, 1993Pullinger and Seligman, 1993
Pullinger et al., 1993Scholte et al.,1993Tanne et al., 1993
Wadhwa et al., 1993Keeling et al., 1994
Magnusson et al., 1994Tsolka et al., 1994
Vanderas, 1994Bibb et al., 1995
Castro, 1995
Hochman et al., 1995Lebbezzo-Scholte et al., 1995
Olsson and Lindqvist, 1995Mauro et al., 1995Tsolka et al., 1995
Westling, 1995Raustia et al., 1995 Conti et al., 1996Sato et al.,1996
Seligman and Pullinger, 1996Henrikson et al., 1997Watanabe et al., 1998Ciancaglini et al, 1999
Kahn et al., 1999Seligman and Pullinger, 2000Pullinger and Seligman, 2000
Rauhala et al., 2000Thilander et al., 2002Carlsson et al., 2002Egermark et al., 2003
Gesch et al., 2004Taskaya-Yilmaz et al., 2004
Landi et al., 2004Pahkala et al., 2004
Magnusson et al., 2005Gesch et al., 2005
Studies that investigate the relationship between occlusion and TMD
Total = 78 Studies Williamson and Simmons, 1979DeBoever and Adriaens, 1983Egermark-Eriksson et al., 1983
Gazit et al., 1984Brandt, 1985
Nesbitt et al., 1985Thilander, 1985
Budtz-Jorgenson et al., 1985Bernal and Tsamtsouris, 1986
Nilner, 1986Stringert and Worms, 1986
Riolo et al., 1987Kampe et al., 1987
Kampe and Hannerz, 1987Gunn et al., 1988
Pullinger, et al., 1988Seligman and Pullinger, 1989
Linde and Isacsson, 1990 Dworkin et al., 1990Kampe et al., 1991Steele et al., 1991
Takenoshita et al., 1991Pullinger and Seligman, 1991Wänman and Agerberg, 1991
Cacchiotti et al., 1991Kampe et al., 1991Steele et al., 1991
Takenoshita et al., 1991Pullinger and Seligman, 1991Wänman and Agerberg, 1991
Cacchiotti et al., 1991Egermark and Thilander, 1992
Shiau and Chang, 1992Glaros et al., 1992
Huggare and Raustia, 1992Kirveskari et al., 1992
Könönen, 1992Könönen et al., 1992
List and Helkimo, 1992Shian and Chang, 1992
Al Hadi, 1993Pullinger and Seligman, 1993
Pullinger et al., 1993Scholte et al.,1993Tanne et al., 1993
Wadhwa et al., 1993Keeling et al., 1994
Magnusson et al., 1994Tsolka et al., 1994
Vanderas, 1994Bibb et al., 1995
Castro, 1995
Hochman et al., 1995Lebbezzo-Scholte et al., 1995
Olsson and Lindqvist, 1995Mauro et al., 1995Tsolka et al., 1995
Westling, 1995Raustia et al., 1995 Conti et al., 1996Sato et al.,1996
Seligman and Pullinger, 1996Henrikson et al., 1997Watanabe et al., 1998Ciancaglini et al, 1999
Kahn et al., 1999Seligman and Pullinger, 2000Pullinger and Seligman, 2000
Rauhala et al., 2000Thilander et al., 2002Carlsson et al., 2002Egermark et al., 2003
Gesch et al., 2004Taskaya-Yilmaz et al., 2004
Landi et al., 2004Pahkala et al., 2004
Magnusson et al., 2005Gesch et al., 2005
Total = 25 Studies
Studies that found no relationship between occlusion and TMDNo No
Williamson and Simmons, 1979DeBoever and Adriaens, 1983Egermark-Eriksson et al., 1983
Gazit et al., 1984Brandt, 1985
Nesbitt et al., 1985Thilander, 1985
Budtz-Jorgenson et al., 1985Bernal and Tsamtsouris, 1986
Nilner, 1986Stringert and Worms, 1986
Riolo et al., 1987Kampe et al., 1987
Kampe and Hannerz, 1987Gunn et al., 1988
Pullinger, et al., 1988Seligman and Pullinger, 1989
Linde and Isacsson, 1990 Dworkin et al., 1990Kampe et al., 1991Steele et al., 1991
Takenoshita et al., 1991Pullinger and Seligman, 1991Wänman and Agerberg, 1991
Cacchiotti et al., 1991Kampe et al., 1991Steele et al., 1991
Takenoshita et al., 1991Pullinger and Seligman, 1991Wänman and Agerberg, 1991
Cacchiotti et al., 1991Egermark and Thilander, 1992
Shiau and Chang, 1992Glaros et al., 1992
Huggare and Raustia, 1992Kirveskari et al., 1992
Könönen, 1992Könönen et al., 1992
List and Helkimo, 1992Shian and Chang, 1992
Al Hadi, 1993Pullinger and Seligman, 1993
Pullinger et al., 1993Scholte et al.,1993Tanne et al., 1993
Wadhwa et al., 1993Keeling et al., 1994
Magnusson et al., 1994Tsolka et al., 1994
Vanderas, 1994Bibb et al., 1995
Castro, 1995
Hochman et al., 1995Lebbezzo-Scholte et al., 1995
Olsson and Lindqvist, 1995Mauro et al., 1995Tsolka et al., 1995
Westling, 1995Raustia et al., 1995Conti et al., 1996Sato et al.,1996
Seligman and Pullinger, 1996Henrikson et al., 1997Watanabe et al., 1998Ciancaglini et al, 1999
Kahn et al., 1999Seligman and Pullinger, 2000Pullinger and Seligman, 2000
Rauhala et al., 2000Thilander et al., 2002Carlsson et al., 2002Egermark et al., 2003
Gesch et al., 2004Taskaya-Yilmaz et al., 2004
Landi et al., 2004Pahkala et al., 2004
Magnusson et al., 2005Gesch et al., 2005
Total = 53 Studies
Studies that found a relationship between occlusion and TMDYes Yes
anterior openbite
increased overjet
increased overbite
centric slide >2 mm
asymmetrical slide
unilateral contact in CR
Angle class II
Angle class II, division 1
Angle class II, division 2
Angle class III
posterior crossbite
anterior crossbite
non working contacts
midline discrepancy
loss of teeth
loss of molar support
presence of restoration
reduced tooth contacts in CO
crowding
“occlusal interferences”
attrition
laterotrusive attrition
anterior attrition
no slide
The following occlusal conditions were reported as related to TMD:
..but all of these conditions were not reported in every study.
What was the occlusal relationship found to be related to TMD?
16 studies = anterior openbite (20%)*
13 studies = increased overjet (17%)
10 studies = centric slide >2 mm (13%)
9 studies = asymmetrical slide (12%)
8 studies = non working contacts (10%)
7 studies = occlusal interferences (9%)
6 studies = unilateral contact in CR (8%)
5 studies = anterior crossbite (6%)
4 studies = Angle class II (5%)
4 studies = Angle class II division 1 (5%)
4 studies = Angle class III (5%)
4 studies = increased overbite (5%)
3 studies = loss of teeth (4%)
3 studies = loss of molar support (4%)
3 studies = posterior crossbite (4%)
3 studies = reduced CO tooth contacts (4%)
2 studies = attrition (4%)
2 studies = presence of restoration (4%)
1 study = Angle class II, division 2 (1%)
1 study = laterotrusive attrition (1%)
1 study = anterior attrition (1%)
1 study = crowding (1%)
1 study = midline discrepancy (1%)
1 study = no slide (1%)
* % of the 78 studies reporting this finding
How common were these conditions reported?
What was the occlusal relationship found to be related to TMD?
16 studies = anterior openbite (20%)*
13 studies = increased overjet (17%)
10 studies = centric slide >2 mm (13%)
9 studies = asymmetrical slide (12%)
8 studies = non working contacts (10%)
7 studies = occlusal interferences (9%)
6 studies = unilateral contact in CR (8%)
5 studies = anterior crossbite (6%)
4 studies = Angle class II (5%)
4 studies = Angle class II division 1 (5%)
4 studies = Angle class III (5%)
4 studies = increased overbite (5%)
3 studies = loss of teeth (4%)
3 studies = loss of molar support (4%)
3 studies = posterior crossbite (4%)
3 studies = reduced CO tooth contacts (4%)
2 studies = attrition (4%)
2 studies = presence of restoration (4%)
1 study = Angle class II, division 2 (1%)
1 study = laterotrusive attrition (1%)
1 study = anterior attrition (1%)
1 study = crowding (1%)
1 study = midline discrepancy (1%)
1 study = no slide (1%)
* % of the 78 studies reporting this finding
How common were these conditions reported?
What was the occlusal relationship found to be related to TMD?
An anterior openbite may bethe results of a TMD,
and not the cause a TMD.
Okeson AAO May 3, 2016
5
16 studies = anterior openbite (20%)*
13 studies = increased overjet (17%)
10 studies = centric slide >2 mm (13%)
9 studies = asymmetrical slide (12%)
8 studies = non working contacts (10%)
7 studies = occlusal interferences (9%)
6 studies = unilateral contact in CR (8%)
5 studies = anterior crossbite (6%)
4 studies = Angle class II (5%)
4 studies = Angle class II division 1 (5%)
4 studies = Angle class III (5%)
4 studies = increased overbite (5%)
3 studies = loss of teeth (4%)
3 studies = loss of molar support (4%)
3 studies = posterior crossbite (4%)
3 studies = reduced CO tooth contacts (4%)
2 studies = attrition (4%)
2 studies = presence of restoration (4%)
1 study = Angle class II, division 2 (1%)
1 study = laterotrusive attrition (1%)
1 study = anterior attrition (1%)
1 study = crowding (1%)
1 study = midline discrepancy (1%)
1 study = no slide (1%)
* % of the 78 studies reporting this finding
How common were these conditions reported?
What was the occlusal relationship found to be related to TMD?- Important -These occlusal conditions do not always lead to TMD!
Normal functioning masticatory system
Etiologic Factors
TMD
Occlusal Factors
The asymptomatic individual
Normal functioning masticatory system
Etiologic Factors
TMD
Occlusal Factors
Trauma
The asymptomatic individual
Normal functioning masticatory system
Etiologic Factors
TMD
Occlusal Factors
Trauma
Emotional Stress
The asymptomatic individual
Normal functioning masticatory system
Etiologic Factors
TMD
Occlusal Factors
Trauma
Emotional Stress
Deep Pain Input
The asymptomatic individual
Normal functioning masticatory system
Etiologic Factors
TMD
Occlusal Factors
Trauma
Emotional Stress
Deep Pain Input
Parafunction
The asymptomatic individual
Okeson AAO May 3, 2016
6
Normal functioning masticatory system
Etiologic Factors
TMD
Occlusal Factors
Trauma
Emotional Stress
Deep Pain Input
Parafunction
The asymptomatic individual
The individual is unaffected
Adaptability of the individual
Adaptability
Genetic factorsBiologic factors
Hormonal factorsPsychosocial factors
Others ?
Normal functioning masticatory system
Etiologic Factors
TMD
Adaptability
The asymptomatic individual
The individual develops TMD
symptoms
Adaptability of the individual
Occlusal Factors
Trauma
Emotional Stress
Deep Pain Input
Parafunction
Genetic factorsBiologic factors
Hormonal factorsPsychosocial factors
Others ?
Etiologic Factors
TMD
The asymptomatic individual
How do you treat the TMD
symptoms?
Normal functioning masticatory system
Correct the occlusal condition
Trauma
Emotional Stress
Deep Pain Input
Parafunction
Adaptability
Adaptability of the individualGenetic factorsBiologic factors
Hormonal factorsPsychosocial factors
Others ?
Normal functioning masticatory system
Etiologic Factors
TMD
Occlusal Factors
Trauma
Emotional Stress
Deep Pain Input
Parafunction
The asymptomatic individual
The individual is unaffected
Adaptability of the individual
Adaptability
Slade, Ohrbach and Maixner: Orthodontic Treatment, Genetic Factors, and Risk of TMD Seminars in Orthodontics Vol14, No 2, 2008, pp 146-156
Three common COMT haplotypeslow pain sensitivity (LPS)
average pain sensitivity (APS)high pain sensitivity (HPS)
Genetic factorsBiologic factors
Hormonal factorsPsychosocial factors
Others ?
1. Does orthodontic therapy lead to an increase in Temporomandibular Disorder symptoms?
2. What causes Temporomandibular Disorder?3. What are the functional treatment goals of
orthodontic therapy?4. When should you consider orthodontic therapy for
the treatment of a Temporomandibular Disorder?5. Can orthodontic therapy prevent TMD?
Some important questions for us to consider.
- Condylar Stability -
• The condyles are in their most superior anterior positionin the fossae resting against the posterior slopes of thearticular eminentiae. (musculoskeletally stable)
• The discs are properly interposed between thecondyles and the fossae.
- Occlusal Stability -
These are the treatment goals for orthodontic therapy
• Even and simultaneous contact of all teeth with posteriorteeth contacting slightly heavier than anterior teeth.
• Adequate tooth-guided contacts on the laterotrusive side.• In the normal upright position, posterior teeth contact
heavier than anterior teeth (envelop of function).
Okeson AAO May 3, 2016
7
Orthodontic therapy can produce orthopedic stability
Joint Stability = Occlusal Stability
The Anterior Protrusive Position
This is a muscle bracedposition not a musculoskeletally
stabilized position.
Some believe the best position for the condyle
is in a forward, protrusive position in
the fossa.
The Anterior Protrusive Position
This is a muscle bracedposition not a musculoskeletally
stabilized position.
Some believe the best position for the condyle
is in a forward, protrusive position in
the fossa.MSS PositionMSS Position
The Anterior Protrusive Position
Does placing the condyle in a forward position cause any anatomical problems?
No, this is a functional position: protrusion
However, the muscles must actively brace the condyle to maintain it in this position.
The Anterior Protrusive Position
1. Functional Orthodontics
What would be the purpose of moving the mandibular forward in a protrusive position?
The Anterior Protrusive Position
Bring the mandibular forward (in a growing patient)…
Insert a functional appliance…
Allow the condyle to grow into the musculoskeletally stable position.
Okeson AAO May 3, 2016
8
The Anterior Protrusive Position
But what if the mandible does not grow?
And the occlusion is established in this forward position.
With time the muscle develops
a myostatic contracture.
A painless shorteningof the functional length
of the muscle.
The Anterior Protrusive Position
But what if the mandible does not grow?
And the occlusion is established in this forward position.
The Anterior Protrusive Position
MSS Position
Now the condyles are braced forward and the occlusion is
stabilized in this position.
What if at a later time the condyles become seated into their
musculoskeletally stable positions?
The Anterior Protrusive Position
Now the condyles are braced forward and the occlusion is
stabilized in this position.
What if at a later time the condyles become seated into their
musculoskeletally stable positions?MSS PositionMSS Position An anterior open bite
(significant orthopedic instability)
The Anterior Protrusive Position
The orthodontist should assess for condylar stability before finishing the occlusion.
1. Try a bilateral mandibular manipulation.
2. Consider an anterior bite plane for a short time (2-7 days).
3. Consider imaging.
- some considerations -
- Conclusion -Radiographs are not an accurate method
of assessing joint position.
Okeson AAO May 3, 2016
9
Does a lack of orthopedic stabilitylead to TMD?
Joint stability
Occlusal instability
Occlusal stability
Joint instability Orthopedic instability
plus loading
An intracapsular disorder
- Important -This orthopedic instability must be of clinical significance.
MSS ICP > 3-4 mm
A “stable malocclusion”
- another important concept -
A dental malocclusionthat is orthopedically stable.
Okeson AAO May 3, 2016
10
A stable dental malocclusion
Orthopedic stability
(not a risk factor)
Find themusculoskeletally
stable position.
Find themusculoskeletally
stable position.
Find themusculoskeletally
stable position.
Orthopedic Instability(a potential risk factor)
(loading)
1. Does orthodontic therapy lead to an increase in Temporomandibular Disorder symptoms?
2. What causes Temporomandibular Disorder?3. What are the functional treatment goals of
orthodontic therapy?4. When should you consider orthodontic therapy for
the treatment of a Temporomandibular Disorder?5. Can orthodontic therapy prevent TMD?
Some important questions for us to consider.
Normal functioning masticatory system
Etiologic Factors
TMD
Adaptability
The asymptomatic individual
Adaptability of the individual
Occlusal Factors
Trauma
Emotional Stress
Deep Pain Input
Parafunction
Orthodontic therapy only affects one factors.
Genetic factorsBiologic factors
Hormonal factorsPsychosocial factors
Others ?
How does orthodontic therapyaffect TMD?
Okeson AAO May 3, 2016
11
Normal functioning masticatory system
Etiologic Factors
TMD
Adaptability
The asymptomatic individual
Adaptability of the individual
Occlusal Factors
Trauma
Emotional Stress
Deep Pain Input
Parafunction
Orthodontic therapy will failto affect the TMD symptoms.
Orthodontic therapy only affects one factors.
Genetic factorsBiologic factors
Hormonal factorsPsychosocial factors
Others ? 1. Does orthodontic therapy lead to an increase in Temporomandibular Disorder symptoms?
2. What causes Temporomandibular Disorder?3. What are the functional treatment goals of
orthodontic therapy?4. When should you consider orthodontic therapy for
the treatment of a Temporomandibular Disorder?5. Can orthodontic therapy prevent TMD?
Some important questions for us to consider.
Normal functioning masticatory system
Etiologic Factors
TMD
Adaptability
The asymptomatic individual
Adaptability of the individualGenetic factorsBiologic factors
Hormonal factorsOthers ?
Occlusal Factors
Trauma
Emotional Stress
Deep Pain Input
Parafunction
Orthodontic therapy only affects one factors.
Goal of orthodontic therapy:Establish orthopedic stability
Orthodontic therapy may reduce only one risk factor associated with TMD.
Occlusal Factors
Some additional thoughts to consider.
So why does the literature report very little relationship between orthodontic and TMD?
Perhaps it isthe patient that makes
us look so good.
So why does the literature report very little relationship between orthodontic and TMD?
- form follows function -
If the occlusion is finalized before final
maturation of the condyles….
…then the TMJs will adapt/develop to the musculoskeletally stable positions.
Okeson AAO May 3, 2016
12
Normal functioning masticatory system
Etiologic Factors
TMD
Occlusal Factors
Trauma
Emotional Stress
Deep Pain Input
Parafunction
The asymptomatic individual
Adaptability
Adaptability of the individualGenetic factorsBiologic factors
Hormonal factorsPsychosocial factors
Others ?
Normal functioning masticatory system
Etiologic Factors
TMD
Occlusal Factors
Trauma
Emotional Stress
Deep Pain Input
Parafunction
The asymptomatic individual
Adaptability
Adaptability of the individual
The adult patient may not have the same
adaptability.
Genetic factorsBiologic factors
Hormonal factorsPsychosocial factors
Others ?
- Conclusions -
The orthodontist should appreciate:
1. The importance of orthopedic stability in the masticatory system.
2. The importance of patient adaptability.3. Occlusal factors are only one of many factors that
may be associated with TMD.
Maintaining a Healthy Functioning Masticatory System through Orthodontic Therapy
Normal functioning masticatory system
Etiologic Factors
TMD
Adaptability
The asymptomatic individual
Adaptability of the individualGenetic factorsBiologic factors
Hormonal factorsOthers ?
Occlusal Factors
Trauma
Emotional Stress
Deep Pain Input
Parafunction
Orthodontic therapy only affects one factors.
Can orthodontic therapyprevent TMD?
Not likely. In order to prevent TMD you must control all the factors.
This greatly concerns me. Thank you for your kind attention.
- Jeffrey P Okeson, DMD
Okeson AAO May 3, 2016
13
Seventh Edition546 pages
February 2014
Quintessence Publishers1-800-621-0387
Seventh Edition488 pages
2013
Elsevier/Mosby Company1-800-325-4177
Newly Updated Lecture Series- DVDs or streaming -www.jeffokeson.net
Okeson TextsOkeson Home Page
University of KentuckyMini-Residency Program
June 6-10, 2016Shadowing Program
1 week (40 hr)