Upload
mfazlanmarikkar
View
47
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Compared the Structure and Culture between Etisalat and Lanka Bell
Citation preview
Organizational Structure & Culture in
Lanka Bell and Etisalat
M.F.M.M.Fazlan
Colombo, Sri Lanka
1.1The organizations structure and culture Lanka Bell and Etisalat
Etisalat and Lanka bell both are running in the telecommunication industry so most of the
factors in the culture and structure are same. They both are using functional organizational
structure
1.1.1 Organization structure of Lanka Bell Services (PVT) (LTD)
1.1.2 Organization structure of Etisalat Lanka (PVT) (LTD
1.1.3 Organization’s culture at Lanka bell and Etisalat
There are many definitions for organizational culture but a popular and simple way of
defining culture is ‘how things are done around here’ A more detailed definition is :
The collection of traditions, values, policies, beliefs, and attitudes that constitute a pervasive
context for everything we do and think in an organization(Atkinson)
There are four g types of culture such as: Power culture, Role culture, Task culture and
person culture. As both companies are in the telecommunication industry and also both
companies are larger companies in Sri Lanka they are following the Role culture.
What is Role Culture?
Role culture stereotyped as a bureaucracy and works by logic and rationality. Role culture
rests on the strength of strong organizational ‘pillars’ – the functions of specialists in, for e.g.;
finance, purchasing and production. The work of, and interaction between the pillars is
controlled by procedures and rules and coordinated by the pediment of senior managers. Role
or job description is more important than the individual and position is the main source of
power.
(Laurie J. Mullins 8th
edition)
So role culture is Common in most organizations today. In a role culture, organizations are
split into various functions and each individual within the function is assigned a particular
role. The role culture has the benefit of specialization. Employees focus on their particular
role as assigned to them by their job description and this should increase productivity for the
company. This culture is quite logical to organize in a large organization.
Different dimensions of organizations culture in Etisalat and Lanka Bell
Profit Orientation
In Etisalat and Lanka Bell profit orientation is law because their main target is to give a best
service to their customers, they are concerning highly on customer satisfaction and delight
People Orientation
People orientation is high in Etisalat because they are paying high salary to their staffs and
they are also paying special incentives according to their performance, their working
environment is very pleasant, they are organizing get to gather parties and motivational
programs for their employees but in Lanka Bell People orientation is Law.
Team Orientation
Team Orientation is high in Etisalat because its employees prefer to work in groups rather in
individuals to achieve their sales targets. So team orientation will lead the company to
increase their sales. But in Lanka Bell team orientation is Low where their employees are
prefer to work as individuals
Innovation
Innovation is high in Etisalat they are coming with new products quickly, they starts with
prepaid connection, after that came with postpaid, launched 3G, broadband and they are
going to launch Etisalat TV. But in Lanka Bell it is very low they are rely only in CDMA
connection
1.2Impacts and relationships of two companies through their structure and
culture
Relationships
Both companies have technical departments in their structure.
Two companies are customer oriented.
There are sales teams in both companies
Leadership styles are almost same.
The both companies have the same Human resource structure
Performance for two companies through their structure and culture
Etisalat have good performance because of their culture and structure, where Lanka Bell have
less performance because that’s small company comparing with Etisalat. Here are some main
reasons for their performance
They have two main departments such as: sales department and marketing department.
There are different marketing managers for prepaid and post paid where they are
introducing new products/services to their customers day by day. And sales department is
taking quick action to increase the sales by dealers / direct sales executives.
Etisalat is focusing highly on innovation where Lanka Bell rely only CDMA connection.
Good customer service in Etisalat.
Etisalat have outsourced their direct sales department where they will bring lots of sales
through commission basis and they have outsourced their IT department as well, so
company could reduce some costs through outsourcing.
Etisalat is giving high motivation, salary and other benefits for their employees so it will
lead the company.
These are the main factors for the performances of Etisalat where Lanka Bell should consider
these factors for future growth.
1.3How organizational theories underpins the practice of management
There are many management theories and organizational theories in every business industry
but many people are not following that when it comes to practice. Reason is that they have to
sacrifice personal principles to succeed.
One example would be when a marketing manager who sets the sales target and planed to
increase the sales by a different plan. In addition human resource manager have to plan the
schedule of employees in the company.
Another reason for this is there are huge competitions in the market in every industry as a
whole, there are lots of software to measure the performance of employees and also due to
the development of marketing activities companies are giving high commitments and
pressure to their employees. When comes to theory there are lots of employee motivational
theory for employees but when it comes to practice its different because of above mentioned
reasons.
1.4 The different approaches used by the management of both companies
There many approaches used by the both companies those are :
Human relations approach
Systems approach
Contingency approach
Human Relations approach
The main emphasis of the classical writers was on structure and the formal organization, but
during the 1920,s the years of the great depression, greater attention began to be paid to the
social factors at work and to the behavior of employees within an organization – that is, to
human relations.
Human relations approach Emphasized importance of human attitudes, values and
relationships for the efficient and effective functioning of work organizations.
Systems approach
The classical approach emphasized the technical requirement of the organizations and its
needs-‘organizations without people’ the human relations approaches emphasized the
psychological and social aspects, and the consideration of human- needs- ‘people without
organizations’
Attention is focus on the total work organization and the inter relationships of structure
and behavior.
In the systems approach Organization is an open system complex social and technical that
require human and financial resources, and physical
Productivity is seen as a function of the interaction between people and building, and the
environment
Contributions of Systems Approach To Management:-
Importance is given to the interdependence of the different parts of an organization and its
environment with the help of systems approach, where the managers have a good view
of the organization and its environment in systems approach
Systems approach will foretastes plans actions and consequences
This approach warns managers against adopting piecemeal approach to the problem-
solving
Contingency Approach
The contingency approach to organization developed as a reaction to the idea that there are
‘universal principles’ for designing organizations, motivating staff etc. newer research
suggested that different forms of organizational structure could be equally successful.
(Class Notes)
The contingency approach, which can be seen as an extension of the systems approach,
highlights possible means of differentiating among alternative forms of the organization
structures and systems of management.
(Laurie J. Mullins 8th edition)
To increase the performance of the company there structure should match with its
environment
The best form of an organization is contingent on the situation faced by that organization
including patients, third-party payers, regulators, and personnel.