25
Oregon Spatial Analysis Project July 2006

Oregon Spatial Analysis Project July 2006. Oregon SAP Background Information ODF Process What We Found What We Learned What We Plan to Modify

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Oregon Spatial Analysis Project July 2006. Oregon SAP Background Information ODF Process What We Found What We Learned What We Plan to Modify

Oregon Spatial Analysis Project

July 2006

Page 2: Oregon Spatial Analysis Project July 2006. Oregon SAP Background Information ODF Process What We Found What We Learned What We Plan to Modify

Oregon SAP

• Background Information

• ODF Process

• What We Found

• What We Learned

• What We Plan to Modify

Page 3: Oregon Spatial Analysis Project July 2006. Oregon SAP Background Information ODF Process What We Found What We Learned What We Plan to Modify

Annual Precipitation

Page 4: Oregon Spatial Analysis Project July 2006. Oregon SAP Background Information ODF Process What We Found What We Learned What We Plan to Modify

Oregon Ecoregions

Page 5: Oregon Spatial Analysis Project July 2006. Oregon SAP Background Information ODF Process What We Found What We Learned What We Plan to Modify

Forestland Ownership

Page 6: Oregon Spatial Analysis Project July 2006. Oregon SAP Background Information ODF Process What We Found What We Learned What We Plan to Modify
Page 7: Oregon Spatial Analysis Project July 2006. Oregon SAP Background Information ODF Process What We Found What We Learned What We Plan to Modify
Page 8: Oregon Spatial Analysis Project July 2006. Oregon SAP Background Information ODF Process What We Found What We Learned What We Plan to Modify

Oregon SAP

• Background Information

• ODF Process

• What We Found

• What We Learned

• What We Plan to Modify

Page 9: Oregon Spatial Analysis Project July 2006. Oregon SAP Background Information ODF Process What We Found What We Learned What We Plan to Modify

Wildfire Risk

Developing Areas

Insect and Disease Risk

Riparian Corridors

Conservation Areas

Priority Zoning

Forest Patch

Public Drinking Water

Private Forestland Activity

Forest Soil Productivity

Threatened & Endangered Species

Proximity to Public Forestland

Wetlands

Topography

Page 10: Oregon Spatial Analysis Project July 2006. Oregon SAP Background Information ODF Process What We Found What We Learned What We Plan to Modify
Page 11: Oregon Spatial Analysis Project July 2006. Oregon SAP Background Information ODF Process What We Found What We Learned What We Plan to Modify

Management Plans

• Forest Stewardship Plans

–1,294 Plans

–712,748 Acres

• Tree Farm Plans

–1,059 Plans

–357,735 Acres

Page 12: Oregon Spatial Analysis Project July 2006. Oregon SAP Background Information ODF Process What We Found What We Learned What We Plan to Modify

Oregon SAP

• Background Information

• ODF Process

• What We Found

• What We Learned

• What We Plan to Modify

Page 13: Oregon Spatial Analysis Project July 2006. Oregon SAP Background Information ODF Process What We Found What We Learned What We Plan to Modify

Management Plans

Page 14: Oregon Spatial Analysis Project July 2006. Oregon SAP Background Information ODF Process What We Found What We Learned What We Plan to Modify

Acres of Plans by Priority

Number of Plans by Priority

21 % of NIPF in Management Plans

Page 15: Oregon Spatial Analysis Project July 2006. Oregon SAP Background Information ODF Process What We Found What We Learned What We Plan to Modify

Oregon SAP

• Background Information

• ODF Process

• What We Found

• What We Learned

• What We Plan to Modify

Page 16: Oregon Spatial Analysis Project July 2006. Oregon SAP Background Information ODF Process What We Found What We Learned What We Plan to Modify

What We Learned

• Strengths– Solid Concept– Visual products

have value– Analysis straight

forward and quick

• Weaknesses– Weighting multiple

layers– Mixing agriculture

and forest lands– Initial layers appear

to focus of environmental factors

– Data limitations

Page 17: Oregon Spatial Analysis Project July 2006. Oregon SAP Background Information ODF Process What We Found What We Learned What We Plan to Modify

Weighting Data Layers14 Layers Dilutes value of weight

Example:

With 14 layers, each worth 7.1%. Weighting one twice as important, 14.2%, has remaining layers at 6.6% each. Difference being 7.6%

With 4 layers, each worth 25%. Weighting one twice as important, 50%, has remaining layers at 16.7% each. Difference being 33.3%

Page 18: Oregon Spatial Analysis Project July 2006. Oregon SAP Background Information ODF Process What We Found What We Learned What We Plan to Modify
Page 19: Oregon Spatial Analysis Project July 2006. Oregon SAP Background Information ODF Process What We Found What We Learned What We Plan to Modify
Page 20: Oregon Spatial Analysis Project July 2006. Oregon SAP Background Information ODF Process What We Found What We Learned What We Plan to Modify
Page 21: Oregon Spatial Analysis Project July 2006. Oregon SAP Background Information ODF Process What We Found What We Learned What We Plan to Modify

Data Layers• Environmental

– Forest Patches– T&E Species– Wetlands– Riparian Areas– Proximity to Public

Lands– Priority Watersheds– Public Water

Supply– Wildfire– Insect and

Diseases

• Economic– Topography– Wildfire– Insect and

Disease– Development

• Social– Public Water

Supply– Development

Page 22: Oregon Spatial Analysis Project July 2006. Oregon SAP Background Information ODF Process What We Found What We Learned What We Plan to Modify

Oregon SAP

• Background Information

• ODF Process

• What We Found

• What We Learned

• What We Plan to Modify

Page 23: Oregon Spatial Analysis Project July 2006. Oregon SAP Background Information ODF Process What We Found What We Learned What We Plan to Modify

What We Plan to Modify

• Stratifying Layers

• Regional Weighting

Page 24: Oregon Spatial Analysis Project July 2006. Oregon SAP Background Information ODF Process What We Found What We Learned What We Plan to Modify

Data Layers• Environmental

– Forest Patches– T&E Species– Wetlands– Riparian Areas– Proximity to Public

Lands– Priority Watersheds– Public Water

Supply– Wildfire– Insect and

Diseases

• Economic– Topography– Wildfire– Insect and

Disease– Development– Soils– Distance to

Milling Facilities– Proximity to

Industrial Lands– Notification of

Operations

• Social– Public Water

Supply– Development– Percent of

economy from forest sector

– Hunting Opportunities

Page 25: Oregon Spatial Analysis Project July 2006. Oregon SAP Background Information ODF Process What We Found What We Learned What We Plan to Modify

Regional Weighting

•Western Oregon

•Central & Eastern Oregon

•Southern Oregon