Upload
dinhkhue
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Miks Robust Design?“Lockheed Martin used to spend an average
of 200 work-hours trying to get a part thatcovers the landing gear to fit. For yearsemployees had brainstorming sessions,which resulted in seemingly logicalsolutions. None worked. The statisticaldiscipline of Six Sigma discovered a partthat deviated by one-thousandth of aninch. Now corrected, the company saves$14,000 a jet.”1
1: Firms aim for Six Sigma efficiency; [FIRST Edition] Del Jones. USA TODAY. McLean, Va.: Jul 21, 1998. pg. 01.B
Miks Robust Design?“It will keep the company (Allied Signal) from
having to build an $85 million plant to fillincreasing demand for caprolactam usedto make nylon, a total savings of $30 -$40 million a year.”1
Raytheon figures it spends 25% of eachsales dollar fixing problems when itoperates at four sigma, a lower level ofefficiency. But if it raises its quality andefficiency to Six Sigma, it would reducespending on fixes to 1%.”1
1: Firms aim for Six Sigma efficiency; [FIRST Edition] Del Jones. USA TODAY. McLean, Va.: Jul 21, 1998. pg. 01.B
Miks Robust Design?“The reason to do DFSS is ultimately
financial. It generates shareholder valuebased on delivering customer value in themarketplace. Products developed underthe discipline and rigor of a DFSS-enabled product development processwill generate measurable value againstquantitative business goals and customerrequirements. DFSS helps fulfill thevoice of the business by fulfilling thevoice of the customer.”2
2: Design for Six Sigma in Technology and Product Development, C.M. Creveling, J. L. Slutsky, and D. Antis, Jr.
–Robust Design’i taust• Mis on Robust Design, DFSS, …?• Design for Quality• Robust Design inseneriarvutustes• Näited• Ebatäpsuse allikad• Ebatäpsuse efektid• Deterministliku ja tõenäosusliku lähenemise võrdlus• Tehnoloogiad
Robust DesignÜlevaade
Küsimused– “Is your company interested in lower its warranty costs and increasing
customer satisfaction?”– “Are you having infield failures that you do not understand given your
current analysis and you wish to understand and prevent these in thefuture?”
– “Is your company interested in the lowest total cost of producing aproduct?”
– “Do feel that you are currently over designing, but don’t have an ideaby how much?”
– “Are you currently holding all dimensions to the same tolerance justbecause this is what you have always done?”
– “Are you constantly testing new lots of material and having to rejectsome suppliers or shipments?”
– “Are you paying a premium to get material that meets or exceeds yourexacting specifications?”
– “Are you rejecting too many parts during the final Product Inspectionchecks?”
– “Are you spending too much money on Product Inspection?”– When you come to a financial commitment gate in your development
process, would you feel more secure making a decision if you had datafrom many design alternatives?"
Robust Design’i taustMis on Robust Design, DFSS, jne?
• Uncertainty AnalysisMääratakse muutuvate suuruste mõjutoote toimimisele (keskväärtused,standard hälve, jne)
• Reliability AnalysisMääratakse arvuliselt usaldusväärsus(tõrke tõenäosus, defekte miljoni kohta)
• Robust Design or Design For Six Sigma(DFSS)Optimeeritakse toodet selliselt, et ta eioleks tundlik muutuvate parameetritesuhtes (N. materjal, koormused, …)
• Reliability-based OptimizationToodet optimeeritakse selliselt, etusaldusväärsus oleks maksimaalne võisiis tõrke tõenäosus oleks minimaalne(defektide arv miljoni toote kohta)
Robust Design on sagelisünonüümks terminile“Design for Six Sigma”või “Reliability-basedOptimization”
Robust Design’i taustDesign for Quality
Six Sigma Quality = ainult 3.4 detaili 1’000’000 ei vasta nõuetele
Six Sigma Quality on oma olemuselt tõenäosuslik meetod
Gaussian Distribution
-6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6
Sigma-Value
Area=
FailureProbability
Product is ...
Bad Good
LSL USL
Product is ...
Good BadLSL = Lower
SpecificationLimit
USL = UpperSpecificationLimit
P.S.: Gaussi jaotus ei ole realistlik, kuid annab ideed edasi korrektselt
Six Sigma = Optimeerib tootmis protsessi selliselt, ettoodetakse automaatselt tooteid mis täidavad sixsigma qualityquality nõudeid
Design For Six Sigma = Optimeeritakse toodet selliselt, et toode täidakssix sigma qualityquality nõudeid, s.t. kvaliteetkvaliteet and usal-dusväärsus on kaasatud optimeerimis protsessi
Design for Six Sigma:• Achieve “Designed-In”
quality as opposed toletting customers findout about qualityproblems
• Make informed decisionthat are critical to qualityearly in the developmentprocess
0.1
1
10
100
1000
Research Design DevelopmentPrototypeTests
Production
Product Development Phases
Rel
. Cos
t of D
esig
n C
hang
e
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Design For Six Sigma Six Sigma
Deg
ree
of F
redo
m to
affe
ct
the
Prod
uct L
ifetim
e C
osts
Robust Design’i taustDesign for Quality
FROM:Reactive Quality
Management
• Extensive Design Rework• Assess Performance by
“build-test-build-test-…”• Fix performance/quality
problems aftermanufacturing
• Quality is “Tested-In”
TO:Predictive Quality
Management
• Controlled DesignParameters
• Estimate likelihood/rate ofperformance problems indesign & development
• Address quality problems indesign & development
• Designed for robustperformance and quality
• Quality is “Designed-In”
Robust Design’i taustDesign for Quality
Robust Design is a Paradigm Shift …
Purpose of Robust Design
InputInputInput ANALYSISANANALYSIALYSISS OutputOutputOutput
�Material Properties�Geometry�Boundary Conditions
�Deformation�Stresses / Strains�Fatigue, Creep,...
It’s a reality that inputparameters are subjected toscatter => automatically the
output parameters areuncertain as well!!
Robust Design’i taustRobust Design in Engineering Analysis
Questions answered with Robust Design:
• How large is the scatter of the output parameters?• What is the probability that output parameters do not fulfill design
criteria (failure probability – defects per million)?• How much does the scatter of the input parameters contribute to the
scatter of the output (sensitivities – critical-to-quality)?
Robust Design’i taustRobust Design in Engineering Analysis
ANALYSISANALYSISANALYSIS
Purpose of Robust Design
20Vibration loads40Acoustic loads10Deployment shock7.5Thermal loads50Transient loads5Launch vehicle , thrust8Honeycomb, face wrinkling10Honeycomb, shear, compression16Honeycomb, tension12Bond insert, axial load8Junction by screws, rivet, welding14Metallic shells, buckling strength17Carbon fiber composites, rupture15Metallic materiales, yieldSD/Mean %Property
Source: Klein, Schueller et.al. Probabilistic Approach to Structural Factors of Safety in Aerospace.
Proc. CNES Spacecraft Structures and Mechanical Testing Conf., Paris 1994
Robust Design’i taustSources of Uncertainty
CFDFEMCAD
FEMGeometry
Materials,Bound.-Cond.,
Loads, ...
Materials,Bound.-Cond., ... Materials,
Bound.-Cond.,
Loads, ...
LCF
Materials
± 0.1-10%
±5-50%
±5-100%
±30-60%
±??%
±5-100%
ThermalAnalysis
StructuralAnalysis
Robust Design’i taustEffects of Uncertainty
Elastsusmooduli ja termilise joonpaisumisteguri mõju termilistelepingetele:σthermal = E · α ·∆T
Deterministlik lähenemine:σMean = EMean · αMean · ∆T Mean = tavaliselt kasutatav lahend
Tõenäosuslik lähenemine:
Tõenäosus et (σ thermal >= 105% σ Mean) (σ thermal >= 110% σ Mean)‘E’ hajuvus ±5% 16% (~1 out of 6) 2.3% (~1 out of 40)
‘E’ ja ‘α‘ hajuvus ±5% 22% (~1 out of 4) 8% (~1 out of 12)
‘E’, ‘α‘ & ‘∆T’ hajuvus ±5% 28% (~1 out of 4) 13% (~1 out of 8)
Robust Design’i taustEffects of Uncertainty
Robust Design’i taustEnabling tehnoloogia: Parametriseerimine
• Robust Design for all parameters including:
– APDL Parameters
/syp,parabatch.exe,'testpb.rsx','testpb.cdb','location',%value%,'testpb_mod.cdb'
/inp,testpb_mod,cdb ! Input the modified geometry
Paramesh db Initial mesh
Parameter name
Parameter value
Output mesh
Import Output mesh
CAD Parameters (Workbench) APDL Parameters
ParaMesh Parameters
Robust Design’i taustVõimaldav tehnoloogia: DesignXplorer
DesignXplorermanages theparameters andthe uncertainties
Results for Maximum Principal StressPressure Side Suction Side
Peak Value σs
Tang.Leaning
AxialLeaning
Dove TailWidth
MaterialDensity
(Gaussian)
Fillet Radius(Lognormal)
Mass
Design Variables andUncertainties
Imbalance: (σp – σs)2 Avg.Stress: 0.5(σp + σs)
Peak Value σp
Robust Design’i näide
Truncated Gaussian
Gaussian (Normal)
Kõige tavalisem statistiline jaotus
Kasutatakse paljude füüsikalisteparameetrite kirjeldamiseks.
Kõige Gaussi jaotuse puhul, kuid äärmisedpiirid lõigatakse, et elimineeridamõõtmisvigasid
Kasutatakse näiteks materjali omaduste võigeomeetria tolerantside kirjeldamiseks.
Lognormal (option 1)
Samuti laialt levinud ja kasutatav jaotus.
Kasutatakse füüsikaliste suuruste kirjeldamiseks, milliste teatud andmetelogaritmid taanduvad normaaljaotusele.
Kasutatav näiteks väsimuse kirjeldamisel.
You provide values for the mean value µ and the standarddeviation σ of the random variable x. The PDS calculates thelogarithmic mean ξ and the logarithmic deviation δ:
Lognormal (option 2)
You provide values for the logarithmic mean value ξ and thelogarithmic deviation δ. The parameters ξ and δ are the mean valueand standard deviation of ln(x)
Triangular
Uniform
Ühtlane jaotus on fundamentaalne jaotusfunktsioonsellistes olukkordades kus muud info ei ole kättesaadavkui alumine ja ülemine piir. Väga kasulik geomeetriatolerantside kirjeldamiseks. Kasutatakse ka sellisteljuhtudel kui ei ole ühtegi tõendust juhuslike väärtustejaotuse kohta kindlas intervalis. Võidakse kasutada kajuhtudel kui "lack of engineering knowledge“ mängib rolli.
Kasutatakse juhuslike suuruste kirjeldamiseks kuiandmeid ei ole olemas. Väga tihti kasutatakseeksperthinnangute kirjeldamisel matemaatilises mudelisja ka koormuste kirjeldamisel. Olenemata probleemist onekspertidelt võimalik küsida näiteks "What is the one-in-a-thousand minimum and maximum case for this randomvariable? Või sarnaseid küsimusi.
Exponential The distribution is mostly used to describe time-related effects; for example, it describes the timebetween independent events occurring at a constantrate. It is therefore very popular in the area ofsystems reliability and lifetime-related systemsreliability, and it can be used for the life distribution ofnon-redundant systems. Typically, it is used if thelifetime is not subjected to wear-out and the failurerate is constant with time. Wear-out is usually adominant life-limiting factor for mechanicalcomponents, which would preclude the use of theexponential distribution for mechanical parts.However in cases where preventive maintenanceexchanges parts before wear-out can occur, then theexponential distribution is still useful to describe thedistribution of the time until exchanging the part isnecessary
Beta The Beta distribution is very useful for randomvariables that are bounded at both sides. If linearoperations are performed on random variables that areall subjected to a uniform distribution then the resultscan usually be described by a Beta distribution. Anexample is if you are dealing with tolerances andassemblies, where the components are assembledand the individual tolerances of the components followa uniform distribution. In this case the overalltolerances of the assembly are a function of adding orsubtracting the geometrical extension of the individualcomponents (a linear operation). Hence, the overalltolerances of the assembly can be described by a Betadistribution. Also, as previously mentioned, the Betadistribution can be useful for describing the scatter ofindividual geometrical extensions of components aswell. The uniform distribution is a special case of theBeta distribution
Gamma
Weibull
The Gamma distribution is again a more time-relateddistribution function. For example it describes thedistribution of the time required for exactly k events tooccur under the assumption that the events take place at aconstant rate. It is also used to describe the time to failurefor a system with standby components.
In engineering, the Weibull distribution is most oftenused for strength or strength-related lifetimeparameters, and it is the standard distribution formaterial strength and lifetime parameters for verybrittle materials (for these very brittle material the"weakest-link-theory" is applicable).
Monte Carlo simulatsioon
Direct Sampling Latin Hypercube Sampling
Matemaatiline mudel sisaldab juhuslikke sündmusi, juhuslikkesuurusi või nende arvkarakteristikuid (näiteks keskväärtust,dispersiooni). Sellise mudeli koostamist nimetataksestatistiliseks modelleerimisek laias tähenduses või MonteCarlo meetodi rakendamiseks laias tähenduses
Monte Carlo simulatsioon
Direct Sampling Latin Hypercube Sampling
The method is always applicable regardless of the physical effect modeled in a finiteelement analysis. It not based on assumptions related to the random outputparameters that if satisfied would speed things up and if violated would invalidate theresults of the probabilistic analysis. Assuming the deterministic model is correct anda very large number of simulation loops are performed, then Monte Carlo techniquesalways provide correct probabilistic results. Of course, it is not feasible to run aninfinite number of simulation loops; therefore, the only assumption here is that thelimited number of simulation loops is statistically representative and sufficient for theprobabilistic results that are evaluated. This assumption can be verified using theconfidence limits, which the PDS also provides.
Because of the reason mentioned above, Monte Carlo Simulations are the onlyprobabilistic methods suitable for benchmarking and validation purposes.
The individual simulation loops are inherently independent; the individual simulationloops do not depend on the results of any other simulation loops. This makes MonteCarlo Simulation techniques ideal candidates for parallel processing.