26
1 OPTIMA INCO-MPC OPTIMA INCO-MPC Third Management Third Management Board Meeting Board Meeting , , May 18/19 2008 May 18/19 2008 Gumpoldskirchen Gumpoldskirchen DDr. Kurt Fedra Environmental Software & Services GmbH A-2352 Gumpoldskirchen Austria [email protected] http://www.ess.co.at

OPTIMA INCO-MPC Third Management Board Meeting , May 18/19 2008 Gumpoldskirchen

  • Upload
    nemo

  • View
    41

  • Download
    2

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

OPTIMA INCO-MPC Third Management Board Meeting , May 18/19 2008 Gumpoldskirchen. DDr. Kurt Fedra Environmental Software & Services GmbH A-2352 Gumpoldskirchen Austria [email protected] http://www.ess.co.at. Baseline targets:. WRM performance targets: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: OPTIMA INCO-MPC Third Management  Board Meeting , May 18/19 2008 Gumpoldskirchen

1

OPTIMA INCO-MPCOPTIMA INCO-MPCThird Management Third Management

Board MeetingBoard Meeting,,May 18/19 2008May 18/19 2008 GumpoldskirchenGumpoldskirchen

OPTIMA INCO-MPCOPTIMA INCO-MPCThird Management Third Management

Board MeetingBoard Meeting,,May 18/19 2008May 18/19 2008 GumpoldskirchenGumpoldskirchen

DDr. Kurt Fedra Environmental Software & Services GmbH

A-2352 Gumpoldskirchen Austria [email protected] http://www.ess.co.at DDr. Kurt Fedra Environmental Software & Services GmbH

A-2352 Gumpoldskirchen Austria [email protected] http://www.ess.co.at

Page 2: OPTIMA INCO-MPC Third Management  Board Meeting , May 18/19 2008 Gumpoldskirchen

2

Baseline targets:Baseline targets:Baseline targets:Baseline targets:

• WRM performance targets:– Complete and reasonable scenario– Total outflow +/- 25% observations– Daily flow at least for ONE station close to end

node */ 2

– Basic economic assessment (basis for optimization and comparison )

• STREAM performance targets:– DO/BOD within reasonable ranges – any WQ

observation data ?– WQ related economics under development

• WRM performance targets:– Complete and reasonable scenario– Total outflow +/- 25% observations– Daily flow at least for ONE station close to end

node */ 2

– Basic economic assessment (basis for optimization and comparison )

• STREAM performance targets:– DO/BOD within reasonable ranges – any WQ

observation data ?– WQ related economics under development

Page 3: OPTIMA INCO-MPC Third Management  Board Meeting , May 18/19 2008 Gumpoldskirchen

3

Case studies: how to proceedCase studies: how to proceed

By PM 18 (December 2005):

• Baselines ready for each case

• Basic economic assessment

• Basic water technologies ready to link, on-line data base

• Optimization framework agreed:– Criteria, objectives, constraints

By PM 18 (December 2005):

• Baselines ready for each case

• Basic economic assessment

• Basic water technologies ready to link, on-line data base

• Optimization framework agreed:– Criteria, objectives, constraints

Page 4: OPTIMA INCO-MPC Third Management  Board Meeting , May 18/19 2008 Gumpoldskirchen

4

Work Plan (simple version)Work Plan (simple version)

WP 07 Cyprus + + -WP 08 Turkey + + +WP 09 Lebanon + - -

WP 10 Jordan + - -WP 11 Palestine/Israel + - -WP 12 Tunisia + - -WP 13 Morocco + - -

WP 07 Cyprus + + -WP 08 Turkey + + +WP 09 Lebanon + - -

WP 10 Jordan + - -WP 11 Palestine/Israel + - -WP 12 Tunisia + - -WP 13 Morocco + - -

Page 5: OPTIMA INCO-MPC Third Management  Board Meeting , May 18/19 2008 Gumpoldskirchen

5

Page 6: OPTIMA INCO-MPC Third Management  Board Meeting , May 18/19 2008 Gumpoldskirchen

6

Page 7: OPTIMA INCO-MPC Third Management  Board Meeting , May 18/19 2008 Gumpoldskirchen

7

Page 8: OPTIMA INCO-MPC Third Management  Board Meeting , May 18/19 2008 Gumpoldskirchen

8

Page 9: OPTIMA INCO-MPC Third Management  Board Meeting , May 18/19 2008 Gumpoldskirchen

9

Page 10: OPTIMA INCO-MPC Third Management  Board Meeting , May 18/19 2008 Gumpoldskirchen

10

Page 11: OPTIMA INCO-MPC Third Management  Board Meeting , May 18/19 2008 Gumpoldskirchen

11

Page 12: OPTIMA INCO-MPC Third Management  Board Meeting , May 18/19 2008 Gumpoldskirchen

12

Page 13: OPTIMA INCO-MPC Third Management  Board Meeting , May 18/19 2008 Gumpoldskirchen

13

Page 14: OPTIMA INCO-MPC Third Management  Board Meeting , May 18/19 2008 Gumpoldskirchen

14

Page 15: OPTIMA INCO-MPC Third Management  Board Meeting , May 18/19 2008 Gumpoldskirchen

15

Page 16: OPTIMA INCO-MPC Third Management  Board Meeting , May 18/19 2008 Gumpoldskirchen

16

Case studies: how to proceedCase studies: how to proceed

Optimization framework:

• Basic economics – TR, CY, ?• Objectives, constraints:

• Instruments, water technologies:

New questionnaires ?

INSTRUMENTS, CONSTRAINTS

Optimization framework:

• Basic economics – TR, CY, ?• Objectives, constraints:

• Instruments, water technologies:

New questionnaires ?

INSTRUMENTS, CONSTRAINTS

Page 17: OPTIMA INCO-MPC Third Management  Board Meeting , May 18/19 2008 Gumpoldskirchen

17

Model use targets:Model use targets:Model use targets:Model use targets:

WRM performance targets:

• Complete and reasonable scenarios includes groundwater links, realistic reservoir data

• Provide observation data for CONTROL NODES, add control nodes for all monitoring stations -> compliance, flood damages

• Basic economic assessment

WRM performance targets:

• Complete and reasonable scenarios includes groundwater links, realistic reservoir data

• Provide observation data for CONTROL NODES, add control nodes for all monitoring stations -> compliance, flood damages

• Basic economic assessment

Page 18: OPTIMA INCO-MPC Third Management  Board Meeting , May 18/19 2008 Gumpoldskirchen

18

ECONOMICS:ECONOMICS:ECONOMICS:ECONOMICS:

Direct Costs:

• Capital and OMR for start nodes, reservoirs, diversions.

Direct Benefits:

• demands satisfied for demand nodes

Direct Costs:

• Capital and OMR for start nodes, reservoirs, diversions.

Direct Benefits:

• demands satisfied for demand nodes

Page 19: OPTIMA INCO-MPC Third Management  Board Meeting , May 18/19 2008 Gumpoldskirchen

19

ECONOMICS:ECONOMICS:ECONOMICS:ECONOMICS:

Indirect Costs:

• shortfall at demand nodes

• penalties at control nodes

• flood damages

Indirect benefits:

• compliance at control nodes

Indirect Costs:

• shortfall at demand nodes

• penalties at control nodes

• flood damages

Indirect benefits:

• compliance at control nodes

Page 20: OPTIMA INCO-MPC Third Management  Board Meeting , May 18/19 2008 Gumpoldskirchen

20

ECONOMICS:ECONOMICS:ECONOMICS:ECONOMICS:

Under development for QUALITY:• Cost of treatment (capital, OMR)

• Cost of waste water reduction (at demand nodes, capital and OMR)

• Penalties for standard violations (control)

• Use benefits for clean water (demand)

• Compliance benefits (control nodes)

• Use benefits (reaches, e.g., recreational)

Under development for QUALITY:• Cost of treatment (capital, OMR)

• Cost of waste water reduction (at demand nodes, capital and OMR)

• Penalties for standard violations (control)

• Use benefits for clean water (demand)

• Compliance benefits (control nodes)

• Use benefits (reaches, e.g., recreational)

Page 21: OPTIMA INCO-MPC Third Management  Board Meeting , May 18/19 2008 Gumpoldskirchen

21

OPTIMISATION:OPTIMISATION:OPTIMISATION:OPTIMISATION:

CONSTRAINTS:

• Global constraints

• Node specific constraints

• Sectoral (not implemented)

directly derived from model results:

CONSTRAINTS:

• Global constraints

• Node specific constraints

• Sectoral (not implemented)

directly derived from model results:

Page 22: OPTIMA INCO-MPC Third Management  Board Meeting , May 18/19 2008 Gumpoldskirchen

22

CONSTRAINTS:CONSTRAINTS:CONSTRAINTS:CONSTRAINTS:

CONCEPTVALUE

Overall Supply / Demand ratio >

Reliability of supply % >

Unallocated water m3/s <

Shortfall m3/s <

Content change/decrease % <

CONCEPTVALUE

Overall Supply / Demand ratio >

Reliability of supply % >

Unallocated water m3/s <

Shortfall m3/s <

Content change/decrease % <

Page 23: OPTIMA INCO-MPC Third Management  Board Meeting , May 18/19 2008 Gumpoldskirchen

23

CONSTRAINTS:CONSTRAINTS:CONSTRAINTS:CONSTRAINTS:Total Cost (combined) Total Benefit (combined)

Total Cost (direct) Total Benefit (direct)

Cost/Benefit ratio (comb.) Benefit/Cost ratio (comb.)

Cost/Benefit ratio (direct) Benefit/Cost ratio (direct)

Water Cost (combined) Economic Efficiency (comb.)

Water Cost (direct) Economic Efficiency (direct)

Net Benefit (combined)

Net Benefit (direct)

And any number of combinations, ratios, node specific, sectoral values, etc.

Total Cost (combined) Total Benefit (combined)

Total Cost (direct) Total Benefit (direct)

Cost/Benefit ratio (comb.) Benefit/Cost ratio (comb.)

Cost/Benefit ratio (direct) Benefit/Cost ratio (direct)

Water Cost (combined) Economic Efficiency (comb.)

Water Cost (direct) Economic Efficiency (direct)

Net Benefit (combined)

Net Benefit (direct)

And any number of combinations, ratios, node specific, sectoral values, etc.

Page 24: OPTIMA INCO-MPC Third Management  Board Meeting , May 18/19 2008 Gumpoldskirchen

24

OPTIMISATION:OPTIMISATION:OPTIMISATION:OPTIMISATION:

1. Technologies are applied to NODES.

2. Each technology affects some model parameters (demand, efficiency/losses) for the different node types at a cost.

3. Benefits accrue from water supplied.

4. Optimization approach: Satisficing• First round: Model selects the combinations

of technologies that meets all constraints

1. Technologies are applied to NODES.

2. Each technology affects some model parameters (demand, efficiency/losses) for the different node types at a cost.

3. Benefits accrue from water supplied.

4. Optimization approach: Satisficing• First round: Model selects the combinations

of technologies that meets all constraints

Page 25: OPTIMA INCO-MPC Third Management  Board Meeting , May 18/19 2008 Gumpoldskirchen

25

TECHNOLOGIES:TECHNOLOGIES:TECHNOLOGIES:TECHNOLOGIES:

Are NOT restricted to technology in a narrow sense, can include policies and institutional change that do affect supply, allocation, demand, efficiency, quality

FOR example: – Pricing/subsidies affects demand– Market (privatization) affects allocation– Enforcement (regulatory change) affects

quality and efficiency

Are NOT restricted to technology in a narrow sense, can include policies and institutional change that do affect supply, allocation, demand, efficiency, quality

FOR example: – Pricing/subsidies affects demand– Market (privatization) affects allocation– Enforcement (regulatory change) affects

quality and efficiency

Page 26: OPTIMA INCO-MPC Third Management  Board Meeting , May 18/19 2008 Gumpoldskirchen

26

Water TechnologiesWater TechnologiesWater TechnologiesWater Technologies• Name, META DATA• Description (unstructured, hypertext HTML, types)

• Application domain• allocation, supply, structures, quality

• Investment (annualized):• unit cost, reference unit for scaling

• Operation (annual):• OMR unit cost, reference unit for scaling

• Effects multiplier for:• Demand, consumptive use, distributions losses

/MANUALS/WATERWARE/watertechnologies.html

• Name, META DATA• Description (unstructured, hypertext HTML, types)

• Application domain• allocation, supply, structures, quality

• Investment (annualized):• unit cost, reference unit for scaling

• Operation (annual):• OMR unit cost, reference unit for scaling

• Effects multiplier for:• Demand, consumptive use, distributions losses

/MANUALS/WATERWARE/watertechnologies.html