34
Optical Illusions: Content Providers and the Impending Transformation of International Transport Tim Stronge

Optical Illusions - PTC | Pacific Telecommunications Council · Optical Illusions: Content Providers and the Impending Transformation of International Transport Tim Stronge

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Optical Illusions: Content Providers and the Impending Transformation of International

Transport

Tim Stronge

Growth depends on content.

Illusion #1

Sometimes, we require motion to comprehend an

image

Source: http://www.michaelbach.de/ot/mot-biomot/index.html

Recognizing the new gestaltInternational Capacity Usage by Network Type

Recognizing the new gestaltInternational Capacity Usage by Network Type

Content providers are

building cables . . . sort of.

Illusion #2

Sometimes, we perceive motion that does not

exist

Source: http://www.ritsumei.ac.jp/%7Eakitaoka/index-e.html

Content really big on some routesInternational Capacity Usage by Network Type by Route, YE 2017

Demand shapes prices . . . but

not

in the way you think.

Illusion #3

Sometimes, we disregard established patterns

Source: http://www.kyb.tuebingen.mpg.de/research/dep/bu/more-on-this-topic/optical-illusions.html

Source: http://www.michaelbach.de/ot/fcs-hollowFace/index.html

A discovery about bandwidth

prices• Faster demand growth -> faster price declines

• Wait, what?

The magic is in the unit costs

• Let’s build a simple, hypothetical cost model:

• Ignore initial capital payoff

• Each cable has ~$7m annual opex

– Wet and dry O&M, backhaul fees, power, SG&A

• 100G upgrades = $100k now, falling 10% p.a.

• Each cable loaded with 6 Tbps in 2017

– Annual demand growth of 30% until fully loaded

Year 1 Year 2

Cost/Month $715,200 $734,760

÷ 100G Wave-Equivalents Sold ÷ 60 ÷ 78

= Cost per 100G Sold/Month = $11,920 = $9,420

Watch the denominator

Capacity drives cable unit costsCost Floor per 100G Wave Sold

Current avg. trans-Atl price

Price finally approaches cost floor?Cost Floor per 100G Wave Sold

Price ∆ if -15% p.a.

Content providers are a solution

to cable funding dilemma

. . . but also a problem.

Illusion #4

Sometimes, the closer we are to an object the less

we see

Source: http://cvcl.mit.edu/hybridimage/

A basic cash flow model

• Same parameters as previous model, except:

• New cable:

– RFS = 2020

– Construction = $150m

– IRU sales early; gradual transition to leases

Hypothetical cable cash flowAnnual Cash Flow: 0 of 6 Fiber Pairs Offloaded

Share the loadCumulative Cash Flow: 0 of 6 Fiber Pairs Offloaded

Share the loadCumulative Cash Flow: 2 of 6 Fiber Pairs Offloaded

Share the loadCumulative Cash Flow: 4 of 6 Fiber Pairs Offloaded

Annual Price ∆Required to Break Even

-17%

-13%

-10%

Content providers as buyers

• Good

– Lots of unanticipated

growth

– Lower unit cost

-> lower prices

– Heavily underwrite some

new cables

• Bad [?]

– Not ubiquitous

– Uncertain future

demand

– Market power shift to a

few buyers

– Content-only cables in

our future?

Final Words of Wisdom

Never be afraid to follow your dream!

Source: Jukin Media https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=69AmeXLnRfk

Final Words of Wisdom

Never be afraid to follow your dream!

Fire, like, BURNS bro!