Page 1
Optical Illusions: Content Providers and the Impending Transformation of International
Transport
Tim Stronge
Page 2
Growth depends on content.
Page 3
Illusion #1
Sometimes, we require motion to comprehend an
image
Page 4
Source: http://www.michaelbach.de/ot/mot-biomot/index.html
Page 7
Recognizing the new gestaltInternational Capacity Usage by Network Type
Page 8
Recognizing the new gestaltInternational Capacity Usage by Network Type
Page 9
Content providers are
building cables . . . sort of.
Page 10
Illusion #2
Sometimes, we perceive motion that does not
exist
Page 11
Source: http://www.ritsumei.ac.jp/%7Eakitaoka/index-e.html
Page 12
Content really big on some routesInternational Capacity Usage by Network Type by Route, YE 2017
Page 13
Demand shapes prices . . . but
not
in the way you think.
Page 14
Illusion #3
Sometimes, we disregard established patterns
Page 15
Source: http://www.kyb.tuebingen.mpg.de/research/dep/bu/more-on-this-topic/optical-illusions.html
Page 16
Source: http://www.michaelbach.de/ot/fcs-hollowFace/index.html
Page 17
A discovery about bandwidth
prices• Faster demand growth -> faster price declines
• Wait, what?
Page 18
The magic is in the unit costs
• Let’s build a simple, hypothetical cost model:
• Ignore initial capital payoff
• Each cable has ~$7m annual opex
– Wet and dry O&M, backhaul fees, power, SG&A
• 100G upgrades = $100k now, falling 10% p.a.
• Each cable loaded with 6 Tbps in 2017
– Annual demand growth of 30% until fully loaded
Page 19
Year 1 Year 2
Cost/Month $715,200 $734,760
÷ 100G Wave-Equivalents Sold ÷ 60 ÷ 78
= Cost per 100G Sold/Month = $11,920 = $9,420
Watch the denominator
Page 20
Capacity drives cable unit costsCost Floor per 100G Wave Sold
Current avg. trans-Atl price
Page 21
Price finally approaches cost floor?Cost Floor per 100G Wave Sold
Price ∆ if -15% p.a.
Page 22
Content providers are a solution
to cable funding dilemma
. . . but also a problem.
Page 23
Illusion #4
Sometimes, the closer we are to an object the less
we see
Page 24
Source: http://cvcl.mit.edu/hybridimage/
Page 26
A basic cash flow model
• Same parameters as previous model, except:
• New cable:
– RFS = 2020
– Construction = $150m
– IRU sales early; gradual transition to leases
Page 27
Hypothetical cable cash flowAnnual Cash Flow: 0 of 6 Fiber Pairs Offloaded
Page 28
Share the loadCumulative Cash Flow: 0 of 6 Fiber Pairs Offloaded
Page 29
Share the loadCumulative Cash Flow: 2 of 6 Fiber Pairs Offloaded
Page 30
Share the loadCumulative Cash Flow: 4 of 6 Fiber Pairs Offloaded
Annual Price ∆Required to Break Even
-17%
-13%
-10%
Page 31
Content providers as buyers
• Good
– Lots of unanticipated
growth
– Lower unit cost
-> lower prices
– Heavily underwrite some
new cables
• Bad [?]
– Not ubiquitous
– Uncertain future
demand
– Market power shift to a
few buyers
– Content-only cables in
our future?
Page 32
Final Words of Wisdom
Never be afraid to follow your dream!
Page 33
Source: Jukin Media https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=69AmeXLnRfk
Page 34
Final Words of Wisdom
Never be afraid to follow your dream!
Fire, like, BURNS bro!