Upload
charlie-castor
View
214
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Opportunities in Increasing the Export of Food Products Based on the Consumer Preferences in Middle East
15 August 2008
Pr Dr Mad Nasir Shamsuddin Prof Dr Jinap Selamat
Dr Roselina KarimProf Madya Dr Jamil Bojei
Dr Rosli SalehDr Tan Chin Ping
1
MAHA 2008
Business Environment
2
Market Size and Growth of The Malaysian Processed Food Exports to Middle East, 2002 – 2006
3
4
Strength1.Malaysia has a good image as a modern Islamic country.
2.Malaysian Halal Certification is perceived as more valid compared to
non-Muslim countries.
3.Malaysian products are perceived as safe and better quality vis-à-vis
other ASEAN countries.
4.Labour productivity is relatively high compared to other ASEAN
countries.
SWOT ANALYSIS
5
Weakness1. Problems faced dealing with Malaysian exporters – lack of professionalism,
such as lack of follow-up, seriousness, lack of correspondence, and very slow in response. Very short-term perspective. SMI entrepreneurs lack legal/social/cultural environment in the importing countries.
2. No consistent supply. 3. Malaysia is weak in understanding and adapting local flavor.4. Sea transportation is not efficient5. Branding is not well established. Too many brands. Each entrepreneur
markets its own brand. Do not have branding which is unique for the country.
6. Although packaging is good, some products have the choices of color which are not attractive.
7. Packaging does not guarantee long shelf-life.
SWOT ANALYSIS
6
Weakness (cont..)8. Cost of production is high. Analysis from the survey indicates that the
prices of products from Thailand are below the Malaysian cost of production. In general, the Malaysian products are about 20% more expensive.
9. Malaysian food products. 10. No strategic alliances like importers or distributors. No private agents to
market the products due to the lack of entrepreneurial skills. 11. Entrepreneurs do not have enough capital to effectively export their
products. 12. Not able to identify consumer needs in terms of taste and preferences. 13. Almost all the local processed product type and categories do not follow
market labeling requirements. 14. Some of the ingredient list do not specify the percentage the ingredients,
nutritional facts, serving size, customer service information.
SWOT ANALYSIS
Opportunities1. 60% of the Saudi’s consumers are youth (< 35 years) and thus indicating
a growing consumer markets and willing to try new products.
2. Saudis’ consumers have purchasing power.
3. GCC is a growing region. Average GCC (8%); Saudi Arabia (10%).
4. Rising costs of production in EU & USA.
5. Tourism industry in Malaysia contributes to developing awareness
among Arab consumers who have been to Malaysia.
6. Strong government supports for SME development in food processing
7. Strong government support in halal products and halal-hub centre
FAMA-UPM Program 4: Project 2 7
SWOT Analysis
Threats 1. Stiff Competition of the Malaysian food products from Thailand,
Indonesia and the Philippines. The prices of the Malaysian
products are generally higher due to the higher production costs.
2. Subsidized tariffs for air transportation by Thailand.
3. Chinese products invading the markets, translated into cheaper
prices.
4. With declining USD, the products from Malaysia are more
expensive.
5. Weak R&D that match SME requirements
FAMA-UPM Program 4: Project 2 8
SWOT Analysis
General Electric Model
9
Ranking Based on Overall Acceptability of Products by Respondents in the ME
No Product Name Category Overall Acceptability Willingness to Buy
1 Sri Kaya Jam and Spread 4.46 4.5
2 Pineapple Jam Jam and Spread 4.16 4.59
3 Starfruit Jam Jam and Spread 4.14 4.28
4 Almond and Ginger Cookies Cookies 4.07 4.2
5 Filled Chocolate Chocolate 4.01 4.31
6 Black Pepper Tapioca Chips Snack 3.96 4.06
7 Pink Guava Juice Beverage 3.92 4.1
8 Roselle Jam Jam and Spread 3.92 4.39
9 Coffee Beverage 3.86 4.24
10 Sesame Ball Snack 3.84 4.2
11 Almond and Tiramisu Chocolate Chocolate 3.83 3.87
12 Butter Cookies Cookies 3.81 4.01
13 Carambola Juice Beverage 3.69 4.2
14 Tamarind Juice Beverage 3.39 3.74
15 Sos Cili Padi Sauce 3.31 3.95
11
Ranking Based on Overall Acceptability of Products by Respondents in The ME
Analysis of Acceptance
FAMA-UPM Program 4: Project 2 12
Middle East
13
Beverages
Snacks
Middle East
FAMA-UPM Program 4: Project 2 14
DMG Butter CookiesNoraini’s Ginger and Almond
Benns Almond TiramisuDazzle Filled
Cookies
Chocolates
Middle East
FAMA-UPM Program 4: Project 2 15
FAMA Serikaya FAMA Jam
FAMA Chilli sauce
Sauces
Jam & Spreads
FAMA-UPM Program 4: Project 2 16
Demographic – Consumer’s Gender
FAMA-UPM Program 4: Project 2 17
Demographic – Age of Consumers
Demographic – Country of Origin
FAMA-UPM Program 4: Project 2 18
FAMA-UPM Program 4: Project 2 19
Demographic – Occupation
Consumer Acceptance - Snacks
*Overall Acceptability denoted by appearance, aroma – Smell,flavor – Sweetness, texture – Body or viscosity and aftertaste. (5= Like Extremely and 1 = Dislike Extremely)
** Overall Packaging denoted by packaging design, color, size of Pack and Overall (5=acceptable and 1=not acceptable)
Consumer Acceptance - Snacks
Consumer Acceptance - Beverages
*Overall Acceptability denoted by appearance, aroma – Smell,flavor – Sweetness, texture – Body or viscosity and aftertaste. (5= Like Extremely and 1 = Dislike Extremely)
** Overall Packaging denoted by packaging design, color, size of Pack and Overall (5=acceptable and 1=not acceptable)
Consumer Acceptance - Beverages
Consumer Acceptance - Beverages
Consumer Acceptance - Cookies
*Overall Acceptability denoted by appearance, aroma – Smell,flavor – Sweetness, texture – Body or viscosity and aftertaste. (5= Like Extremely and 1 = Dislike Extremely)
** Overall Packaging denoted by packaging design, color, size of Pack and Overall (5=acceptable and 1=not acceptable)
Consumer Acceptance - Cookies
Consumer Acceptance - Chocolate
*Overall Acceptability denoted by appearance, aroma – Smell,flavor – Sweetness, texture – Body or viscosity and aftertaste. (5= Like Extremely and 1 = Dislike Extremely)
** Overall Packaging denoted by packaging design, color, size of Pack and Overall (5=acceptable and 1=not acceptable)
Consumer Acceptance - Chocolate
Consumer Acceptance – Jam / Spread
*Overall Acceptability denoted by appearance, aroma – Smell,flavor – Sweetness, texture – Body or viscosity and aftertaste. (5= Like Extremely and 1 = Dislike Extremely)
** Overall Packaging denoted by packaging design, color, size of Pack and Overall (5=acceptable and 1=not acceptable)
Consumer Acceptance –Jam/Spread
Consumer Acceptance – Jam / Spread
Consumer Acceptance – Sauce
*Overall Acceptability denoted by appearance, aroma – Smell,flavor – Sweetness, texture – Body or viscosity and aftertaste. (5= Like Extremely and 1 = Dislike Extremely)
** Overall Packaging denoted by packaging design, color, size of Pack and Overall (5=acceptable and 1=not acceptable)
Consumer Acceptance – Sauce
Preference Test in Jeddah
FAMA-UPM Program 4: Project 2 34
Product Category Type of product
Local brand Competitor’s brand
Jam Pineapple jam AgroMas Halwani Bros
Beverage Coffee Anggerik 3-in-1 Nescafe 3-in-1
Cookies Butter cookies DMG Royale Danish
Americana
Cookies Ginger & almond cookies
Noraini’s Jules Destrooper
AlmondCookies
Coffee 3 in 1Vs
Vs
Preference Test in Jeddah (cont..)
FAMA-UPM Program 4: Project 2 36
Agromas VS Halwani Bros
Pineapple Jam
DMG Royale Danish VS Americana Butter Cookies
Preference Test in Jeddah (cont..)
Product Category
No. of respondents Jam Beverage Cookies
Pineapple jam
Coffee(3-in-1) Butter cookies Ginger & almond cookies
Prefer Malaysian product
26
AgroMas34
Anggerik 3-in-17
DMG Royale Danish
10
Noraini’s
Prefer competitor’s product
34
Halwani Bros27
Nescafe 3-in-136
Americana16
Jules Destrooper
Total no. of respondents 60 61 42 26
Min. no. to show sig. difference at P<0.05
39 30 28 19
Notes: No significant difference
Significant difference
Significant difference
No significant difference
Paired Comparison Test for Preference of Malaysian Products Versus Competitors
Techno-Quality-Economic Matrix for Export Ready and Product Potential by Product Category
FAMA-UPM Program 4: Project 2 38
FAMA-UPM Program 4: Project 2 39
Techno-Quality-Economic Matrix for Export Ready and Product Potential by Product
40
ME – Ready
Bumi Hijau Black Pepper
Jalen Chilli
Black Pepper & Spicy Flavoured FAMA
Nani Fried Sesame Kart Food Steamed Bun
Muslim Best Salsa Sauce
ME - Potential
Way Forward
No Strategy Action Plan Remarks
1. Identify relevant market segment
1. Introduce food products that are more appealing to younger generation (e.g. trendy packaging)
2. Target the promotion to younger generation (e.g. associated with sport activities, school children)
1. The younger generation tends to be more open & willing to try new products
2. Promote products which are produced by SMEs that have sufficient capacity to meet importer demand
1. Encourage SMEs to collaborate, form a consortium to achieve the size needed to meet importers demand.
1. Most SMEs are under capacity to venture into export markets
42
Way Forward
No Strategy Action Plan Remarks
3. Improve the professionalism of the Malaysian entrepreneurs
1. Training in Entrepreneurship Development especially in export market promotion, ethics, and legal-cultural environment
1. Lack of professionalism among Malaysian exporters (communication and promises)
4. Develop structured human resource in terms of functionality
1. Restructure human resource to have staff that are competent (e.g. export activities should undertake by export manager, quality control personnel to ensure consistent product quality)
1. Most SMEs do not have structured functions in the human resource set-up
43
Way Forward
No Strategy Action Plan Remarks
5. Upgrade processing technology
1. Upgrade the processing technology of SMEs through government incentive schemes (e.g. soft loan, tax deduction, technical support)
1. About 50 % of SMEs surveyed still use manual or semi-automated processing technology.
2. SMEs must utilize relevant processing technology in order to be competitive.
6. Develop a systematic raw materials procurement system
1. Establish contract farming for raw materials supply
2. Train SMEs entrepreneurs in price forecasting
1. SMEs are facing inconsistent supply and quality of raw materials as well as fluctuation of in the price
44
Way Forward
No Strategy Action Plan Remarks
7. Identify critical success factors of companies that are successful in exporting food products
1. Training in Entrepreneurship Development especially in export market promotion, ethics, and legal-cultural environment
1. Lack of professionalism among Malaysian exporters (communication and promises)
8. Promote strategic alliance between SMEs and LEs
1. Promote contract manufacturing between SMEs and Les
2. Promote joint venture to reduce cost
3. Joint promotion between SMEs and distributors in importing countries
1. In Thailand, food manufacturing SMEs aligned themselves with large Enterprises (LE) for exports market.
45
Way Forward
No Strategy Action Plan Remarks
9. Formulate Malaysian food branding
1. Develop a ‘unified brand’ for all Malaysian food products produced by new SMEs players
1. Food products presently marketed by the individual brands. Global brand helps to reduce the advertisement and promotion cost.
10. Identify a reliable private distribution agent for marketing purposes
1. MATRADE must develop database on marketing agents
2. MATRADE should develop criteria in selecting reliable export agent
1. Promotion by agents and product distribution was identified as the most serious marketing problem.
46
Way Forward
No Strategy Action Plan Remarks
11. Position SMEs food products as premium products
1. Enhanced joint promotional effort by manufacturers and distributors to support product positioning
1. In general the production costs of Malaysian food products is 20 % higher than Thailand and Indonesia
12. Establish food products Distribution Centre
1. Establish a private trade representative in Dubai (as a gateway) by a consortium of SMEs
1. Need to establish a Distribution Center - acts as a distribution agent.
2. MATRADE needs to identify reliable distributors/importers as agents.
3. Strategic partnership as a pushing factor in marketing the products.
47
Way Forward
48
Techno-Quality-Economic Matrix for Export Ready and Product Potential by Product
Opportunities (O)More preferable than established brandNext popular beverage in the after tea
Strength (S)Overall acceptability score is high
Treats (T)Compete with the established product in the market
Weakness (W) Lack of coffee flavour and
aroma Lack of bitterness (Jeddah) Low in viscosity (thin
mouthfeel)
FAMA-UPM Program 4: Project 2 49
Situational Analysis - Coffee
Strategy
Product Improvement (flavor, aroma, viscosity)
Improve product image to be at par with the established brand. (Incorporate health element ingredient such as Tongkat Ali and Conduct in-house promotion in foreign countries)
Execute aggressive advertising and promotion (Participate in trade exhibition and Assign foreign agent for promotion)
FAMA-UPM Program 4: Project 2 50
Action Plan - Coffee
Opportunities (O)No similar product in the marketHighly acceptable by consumers
Strength (S)Unique in tasteProcessing and packaging technology is readily availableBrand new productThe product is highly accepted
Treats (T)Existence of indirect competitors
Weakness (W)Unknown shelf lifeCritical food safety issueLack of HACCP /ISO22000 CertificationLack of coconut flavourLack of spreadability Inappropriate labeling design- picture of coconut on the label is disproportionate with picture of other ingredients
51
Situational Analysis – Seri Kaya
Strategy
Implement product improvement (shelf life)
Implement product improvement (flavor, spreadability)
Improvement in product labeling
Develop food safety management system (establish effort
to obtain the necessary certification)
Develop preemptive strategy Apply for registered
trademark
Introduce product promotionFAMA-UPM Program 4: Project 2 52
Action Plan – Seri Kaya
Opportunities (O)•Preference of product equivalent to existing product.•Product is highly accepted (in term overall acceptability and sensory attributes)
Strength (S)Processing and packaging technology is readily availableAvailability of raw materialThe product is highly accepted
Treats (T)Compete with similar product in the market
Weakness (W)Lack of sournessProduct is too sweet
53
Situational Analysis – Pineapple Jam
Strategy
Implement product improvement (flavor) - optimum
sourness and sweetness
Execute aggressive advertising and promotion
(participate in trade exhibition, conduct in-house
promotion in foreign countries and assign foreign agent
for promotion)
Implement product differentiation
Increase production for export
FAMA-UPM Program 4: Project 2 54
Action Plan – Pineapple Jam
Opportunities (O)No similar product in the market
Strength (S)Brand new productHighly accepted by consumers in term of sensory attributesProcessing and packaging technology is readily available
Treats (T)Nil
Weakness (W)Consumers are unfamiliar with productPoor product uniformity (sesame seeds separated from the ball during frying)The filling is too sweetTexture is too chewyFluctuation of quality due to improper cold chain management
55
Situational Analysis – Frozen Sesame Ball
Strategy
Dough Improvement
Widen the selection for the frozen snack in terms of filling
Educate consumers on the product usage conduct promotion through
a) in store promotion, b) infomercial promotion and c) professional
chef cooking TV series or website .
Upgrade product safety (develop and implement food safety
management system (GMP, ISO 2200, HACCP))
Upgrade knowledge among staff dealing with cold chain
management (conduct training in cold chain management)
FAMA-UPM Program 4: Project 2 56
Action Plan – Frozen Sesame Ball
Opportunities (O) High market potential Willingness to buy is moderate (4.06 out of 5 scale for black pepper flavor)
Strength (S)Sensory attributes of black pepper flavoured tapioca chips is quite acceptable (score out of 7 hedonic scale for black pepper flavor)Products with varieties of flavors
Treats (T)Compete with established snacks such as potato chips and extruded products
Weakness (W) Poor product quality (e.g.. broken
into pieces) Lack of uniformity and consistency
in terms of colour and shape. Shorter shelf life – rancidity, loss of
crispiness Lack of processing and packaging
technology Low quality of the lid opener as the
opener easily broken and the strength of the metal lid is weak (easily torn apart). 57
Situational Analysis – Tapioca Chip
Strategy
Develop promotional program to introduce tapioca chips (conduct
promotion through in store promotion and infomercial promotion)
Need for product improvement (using reconstituted technology)
Upgrade packaging technology (adopt nitrogen-filled packaging
technology)
Upgrade processing technology (promote automated processing
machinery among SMEs)
Improvement in product shelf life (up to 2 years)
Improvement on product quality (training on handling during
transportation)FAMA-UPM Program 4: Project 2 58
Action Plan – Frozen Sesame Ball