19
Opportunities & Challenges – Energy Storage February 2011 The National Academies Workshop Phoenix, AZ M. Scott Faris CEO [email protected] 407-459-1442

Opportunities & Challenges – Energy Storage · Solid State Micro-Batteries Don’t Scale Thin Films Have Limited Storage Capacity & Rates Traditional Deposition Approaches are Expensive

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Opportunities & Challenges – Energy Storage · Solid State Micro-Batteries Don’t Scale Thin Films Have Limited Storage Capacity & Rates Traditional Deposition Approaches are Expensive

Opportunities & Challenges –Energy Storage

February 2011

The National Academies Workshop Phoenix, AZ

M. Scott [email protected]

Page 2: Opportunities & Challenges – Energy Storage · Solid State Micro-Batteries Don’t Scale Thin Films Have Limited Storage Capacity & Rates Traditional Deposition Approaches are Expensive

• NiMH, Pb, Li ion are mature

• Industry Requires dramatic1. Materials leverage2. Cost reductions3. Energy densities4. Lifetime & Safety5. Form Factor Flexibility6. Environmental Friendliness

•Scaling “is” the challenge

Battery Industry is StuckBattery Industry is StuckVolumes are Substantial

Nano-Materials Costs Are Substantial

CONFIDENTIAL

http://www.altenergystocks.com/archives/2010/01/storm_warnings_for_lithiumion_batteries_and_electric_vehicles.htmlhttp://www.altenergystocks.com/archives/2009/06/understanding_the_development_path_for_liion_battery_technologies_1.html

8300 cell phonebatteries

68% cell isengineered materials

Page 3: Opportunities & Challenges – Energy Storage · Solid State Micro-Batteries Don’t Scale Thin Films Have Limited Storage Capacity & Rates Traditional Deposition Approaches are Expensive

CONFIDENTIAL 3

ARPAARPA--e Portfolio of Fixese Portfolio of FixesTHEME:•Remove Non Functional Materials

•Remove Liquids/Polymers

•Remove Costs

•Increase Density, Safety, Cycle Life

Page 4: Opportunities & Challenges – Energy Storage · Solid State Micro-Batteries Don’t Scale Thin Films Have Limited Storage Capacity & Rates Traditional Deposition Approaches are Expensive

4

Why Solid State for Batteries?Why Solid State for Batteries?Paradigm Changer

Page 5: Opportunities & Challenges – Energy Storage · Solid State Micro-Batteries Don’t Scale Thin Films Have Limited Storage Capacity & Rates Traditional Deposition Approaches are Expensive

Why Solid State Batteries ?Why Solid State Batteries ?

Ceramic Battery Difference:Replace the plastics, binders, powders and liquids with durable, nanostructured films

Operating Benefits:•Long operating lives at optimal performance

•Elimination of shorts and battery failures

•50%+ reduction in cell weight & volume

•Fast recharge cycles

•Higher operating temperature ranges reduces thermal management challenges

•No liquids eliminates “thermal runaway”

Enabling new products & applications

•Battery/Capacitor hybrids

Page 6: Opportunities & Challenges – Energy Storage · Solid State Micro-Batteries Don’t Scale Thin Films Have Limited Storage Capacity & Rates Traditional Deposition Approaches are Expensive

Game Changing Platform TechnologySolid State Energy/Monolithic Ceramic Batteries

Superior Economics50% Reduction in Capex Per KwH65% Reduction in Materials Cost

Superior Performance2-3 X Energy Density IncreaseLong Life (5,000 cycles)Fast Charge & Disharge (5C)

Absolute SafetyNothing flammableHigh Temperature Range

Scalable Manufacturing ApproachRoll to Roll ManufacturingEliminate “Formation” of CellsNo Vacuum

A New Approach to Energy StorageA New Approach to Energy Storage

6

Embedded Power Source

Lower Cost Batteries

Longer “Lifecycle” RuntimeNew Feature Sets

Consumer Proof

New Levels of Integration

Page 7: Opportunities & Challenges – Energy Storage · Solid State Micro-Batteries Don’t Scale Thin Films Have Limited Storage Capacity & Rates Traditional Deposition Approaches are Expensive

§ Dramatic Reductions in Materials (50%)§ Higher Performance Materials (1000X)§ No Liquids (No Fires)§ Monolithic Cell Architecture (R2R Mfg.)

3

Traditional Li-ion Battery

Planar’s – Solid State Battery

Solid State ArchitectureSolid State Architecture

Page 8: Opportunities & Challenges – Energy Storage · Solid State Micro-Batteries Don’t Scale Thin Films Have Limited Storage Capacity & Rates Traditional Deposition Approaches are Expensive

• .5mAh/cm vs 20mAh/cm

• Lipon is poor conductor •1-2 Orders of Magnitude Too Low

• Limited Cathode opportunities

Solid State MicroSolid State Micro--Batteries DonBatteries Don’’t Scalet Scale

Thin Films Have Limited Storage Capacity & Rates

Traditional Deposition Approaches are Expensive

• $100’s+ Sq M for Thin Film•Needs to be $1’s

• Slow Deposition Rates•Thin Film tough, Thick Film non-starter

• Complex Mfg. Processes & Device Designs/Packaging

Page 9: Opportunities & Challenges – Energy Storage · Solid State Micro-Batteries Don’t Scale Thin Films Have Limited Storage Capacity & Rates Traditional Deposition Approaches are Expensive

Current solid state battery fabrication methods do not scale to large format batteries because of:

?

Vacuum Deposition Cost ofThick, Large Area Films

$25,000 Sq. MVs

$1’s Sq. M

Practical Challenge of Solid State BatteriesPractical Challenge of Solid State Batteries

9

13mm x 13mm 4 micron film

300mm x 100mm75 micron Active Film

Page 10: Opportunities & Challenges – Energy Storage · Solid State Micro-Batteries Don’t Scale Thin Films Have Limited Storage Capacity & Rates Traditional Deposition Approaches are Expensive

u Solution Based Process Enabling Roll to Rollu Cap Ex: 10% Cost of Vacuum - 1000x Faster than Vacuumu Materials: $1’s/kilo vs. $100’s/Kilou Unlimited Materials Sets

Cost of Printed Electronics with Performance of VacuumDeposited Films

Enables new, flexible manufacturing model for large areaSemiconductor devices.

Streaming Process for Electroless Electrochemical DepositionStreaming Process for Electroless Electrochemical Deposition““SPEEDSPEED””

Planar Breakthrough: High Performance Planar Breakthrough: High Performance Printed Electronic Films & DevicesPrinted Electronic Films & Devices

Page 11: Opportunities & Challenges – Energy Storage · Solid State Micro-Batteries Don’t Scale Thin Films Have Limited Storage Capacity & Rates Traditional Deposition Approaches are Expensive

11

Primary chemicals

Nano-particles formation

Slurry or ink formulation

Web coating or ink printingof nano-particle film

Primary chemicals

Water based solution formulation

Direct nano-particle film deposition

SPEEDSPEEDOther MethodsOther Methods

Nanomaterial Growth InnovationNanomaterial Growth Innovation

Page 12: Opportunities & Challenges – Energy Storage · Solid State Micro-Batteries Don’t Scale Thin Films Have Limited Storage Capacity & Rates Traditional Deposition Approaches are Expensive

Collector Layer

Metallic Anode Layer

Separator Layer

Cathode Layer

Metallic CollectorSubstrate

New Approach to Battery ManufacturingNew Approach to Battery Manufacturing

Page 13: Opportunities & Challenges – Energy Storage · Solid State Micro-Batteries Don’t Scale Thin Films Have Limited Storage Capacity & Rates Traditional Deposition Approaches are Expensive

13

SPEED R2R Battery ManufacturingSPEED R2R Battery Manufacturing

Page 14: Opportunities & Challenges – Energy Storage · Solid State Micro-Batteries Don’t Scale Thin Films Have Limited Storage Capacity & Rates Traditional Deposition Approaches are Expensive

14

Real Hardware Demonstrated

Page 15: Opportunities & Challenges – Energy Storage · Solid State Micro-Batteries Don’t Scale Thin Films Have Limited Storage Capacity & Rates Traditional Deposition Approaches are Expensive

15

Real Materials: Solid State Electrolyte ThioLisiconReal Materials: Solid State Electrolyte ThioLisicon

Si

SSE

TiN

SnO

SSE

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8-0.004

-0.003

-0.002

-0.001

0.000

0.001

0.002

0.003

0.004111909 B1_2

SSE 10 µA

Vol

tage

(V)

Time (hours) 0 200 400 600 80010-12

10-11

1x10-10

1x10-9

1x10-8

1x10-7

1x10-6

1x10-5

1x10-4

1x10-3

1x10-2

1x10-1

1x100

10710-1 Li/SSE/Li SS/SSE/In

Con

duct

ivity

(S/c

m)

Time (seconds)

Page 16: Opportunities & Challenges – Energy Storage · Solid State Micro-Batteries Don’t Scale Thin Films Have Limited Storage Capacity & Rates Traditional Deposition Approaches are Expensive

Real Ceramic Batteries DemonstratedReal Ceramic Batteries Demonstrated

16

Fig 1 – Cell “Core” Design Substrate

Electrolyte

Cathode

Stainless Steel

Anode

Page 17: Opportunities & Challenges – Energy Storage · Solid State Micro-Batteries Don’t Scale Thin Films Have Limited Storage Capacity & Rates Traditional Deposition Approaches are Expensive

Long Development CyclesMaterials Science Device AcceptanceMarket Acceptance

Complex Development CyclesProcess MaterialsDevice

Fragmented Innovation NetworkPieces of puzzle spread far and wideNeed to Agglomerate Technology

Cap Ex Intense Business ModelsProof vs. Scale

““MacroMacro”” Opportunities & ChallengesOpportunities & Challenges

17

Effective Strategic PartnershipsUniversity vs. CompanySmall vs. Big Company

FINDING VALUE ADD CAPITALResearch $’sEarly stage vs. growth $’s

Fragmented Industry StructureLack of Roadmaps

Process, Materials, AppsGlobal Playing FieldOpen Innovation vs. Proprietary IP

National Security EthicsDomestic vs. Foreign Partnerships

Page 18: Opportunities & Challenges – Energy Storage · Solid State Micro-Batteries Don’t Scale Thin Films Have Limited Storage Capacity & Rates Traditional Deposition Approaches are Expensive

New Hardware DevelopmentComplex Materials thru Complex Machines

vs.Complex Materials thru Simple Chemistry & Simple Machines

Mfg. Metrology ChallengesNew Materials require new types of measurements

R2R requires speed & precision from tools that are precise and slow

Materials Integration ChallengesModeling Tools & Expertise

““ExecutionExecution”” Opportunities & ChallengesOpportunities & Challenges

18

Human CapitalElectrochemistsManufacturingImmigration Constraints

Page 19: Opportunities & Challenges – Energy Storage · Solid State Micro-Batteries Don’t Scale Thin Films Have Limited Storage Capacity & Rates Traditional Deposition Approaches are Expensive

Thank YouContact:

M. Scott Faris, CEOPlanar Energy, Inc.653 W Michigan StOrlando, FL 32805

407-459-1442 (direct)[email protected]

19