Upload
edgar-lynch
View
215
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Operationally Responsive Space (ORS)
and TacSat Overview
for
NSF Small Sat Workshop
May 16, 2007
OSD Office of Secretary of Defense
Mike Hurley202-767-0528
TacSat-1
TacSat-2
TacSat-3
TacSat-4
Col Tom Doyne 703-696-5766
Dr Peter Wegner 505-853-3486
Lt Col George Moretti505-846-0623
Mark Johnson202-404-5328
Tim Duffey202-404-3041
Presented by:
Chris Huffine202-404-4272
Chris Olmedo505-853-2867
Supporting Authors on Joint RSC5 Paper and Similar
Presentations Also Shown:
.2
Topics and Reference
• ORS Big Picture
• TacSat Experimentation
• ORS Payload Technology Initiative
• Bus Standards Initiatives
• Emerging ORS Office and Community
• Conclusions
For a Summary of the ORS Activities In Progress a Good Reference Paper is in AIAA Responsive Space Conference #5 April 2007
Paper #2007-4001
.3
Why ORS? … The Need
• Global Environmental Changes Require Increased Agility to Respond to Increased Uncertainty
1) Increased Geopolitical Uncertainty - End of Cold War With Stable, Predictable Adversary
- Global War on Terror – Changing Locations and Techniques
- More Countries Achieving New Space & Military Capabilities
2) Rapid Technology Improvement Cycles Resulting in New and Unpredicted Capabilities and Tactics Used by Others
This New Environment Affects All Elements, Not Specific to Space
.4
Where Is ORS Development?
• Moving From Unarticulated Rqmts (OFT) to Formal Requirements and Initial Acquisitions ….About 3/4 Way Through the Process Now
• TacSat Experiments Help to Shape the CONOPS and Inform Future Requirements
FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08FY03 FY04
OFT ORS Unarticulated Requirement…StartedTacSat-1 May 2003, Spacecraft Complete May 2004
Acquisitions StartFY08-10 (POM)
ORS Requirements in Development… STRATCOM Vision and CONOPS Defined
ORS Momentum Picked Up in FY04-FY05
Service S&T Communities(ONR, Army, AFRL) Began Funding and POMs for TacSat Experimentation (~$20M per TacSat Experiment) WE
ARE HERE
Joint ORS Office being Stood Up
5/21/07
TacSat-3 & 4 Missions Selected via Joint Process Led by AFSPC and STRATCOM
120 Day ORS Study & Report
to Congress
Jan 2005 US Space Transportation Policy Calls for ORS Access & Use
.5
TacSat Update: #1 - #4
• TacSat-1– Navy Led Experiment for OSD’s OFT – Tactical RF Payloads and UHF Cross-Platform Link– Low Resolution Visible (70m) and IR (850m) Cameras– Direct Access Via SIPRNET and VMOC Web Site– Spacecraft Completed May 04, Within 1 Year – Launch: Falcon-1 Winter 07
• TacSat-2– Air Force Led Experiment– Tactical Imaging and RF Payloads– Tactical CDL and UHF Links– Multiple Science Payloads– Launched on Minotaur-I, Dec 2006
• TacSat-3– Began First Joint Process for Selection
- Selected October 2004 – Air Force Led Experiment– AF/Army Hyperspectral Primary Payload– Navy Small Data-X Payload for IP-Based Buoy Comms– Launch on Minotaur-I, December 2007
• TacSat-4– Mission Jointly Selected on October 2005– Navy Leading With COTM/Data-X/BFT– Launch on Minotaur-IV, October 2008
• TacSat-5 : Selection this Summer
TacSat-2
TacSat-3
TacSat-4
TacSat-1
Experiment w/ Key System Elements to Mature Understanding and CONOPS for Operational Utility and Systems
Overall Experimentation Purpose
.6
TacSat Cycle Selections are Approximately Annual
COCOMS & OPERATIONALSERVICE COMPONENTS
S&T/R&D COMMUNITY
Needs & Requirements
DoD S&T Vector #2Enabling Tech Objectives
for Launch, Spacecraft, Operations, & Theater
Integration
TacSatDesign & Selection
Operational Experimentation
and MUA
OPSATAcquisition
ConsiderationOperational Utility, CONOPS, TTPS
Enabling Technologies andORS System Development
TacSatImplementation
Increased Technology
Readiness and/or System Development
.7
TacSat CycleSelections are Approximately Annual
COCOMS & OPERATIONALSERVICE COMPONENTS
S&T/R&D COMMUNITY
Needs & Requirements
DoD S&T Vector #2Enabling Tech Objectives
for Launch, Spacecraft, Operations, & Theater
Integration
TacSatDesign & Selection
Operational Experimentation
and MUA
OPSATAcquisition
ConsiderationOperational Utility, CONOPS, TTPS
Enabling Technologies andORS System Development
TacSatImplementation
Increased Technology
Readiness and/or System Development
Battlefield Characterizationfor Camouflage, etc. HSI
High Rate TheaterCDL Downlink
.8
From S&T Vector #2 (SPRING 06) Responsive Satellite Enabling Technology
• Tactical Operations and Data Dissemination:
– Integrated with existing ISR C2 (e.g. Space CDL, UHF, JTRS, GBS)
– New COMSEC techs. & processes– Decision quality
data to the warfighter
• Modular Design: – Plug ‘n play architecture– Standard, open architecture
interfaces
• Rapid Deployment: – Mission planning
tools / tailored orbits– Fast assembly and test– Rapid autonomous
deployment / checkout
• Advanced Small / Microsat Technologies:
– Efficient propulsion– Advanced power– Lightweight, low cost
apertures– Low cost rad-tolerant
components
S&T Vector #2 Guides DoD Investment in Response Space Area for Coordinated Investment in Enabling Capabilities. AFRL Leads for DoD.
S&T Vector #2 Guides DoD Investment in Response Space Area for Coordinated Investment in Enabling Capabilities. AFRL Leads for DoD.
• ResponsiveResponsive
• AffordableAffordable
• EmployableEmployable
• IntegratedIntegrated
.9
ORS Payload Technology Initiative
.10
ORS Payload Technology Initiative
• Goal: ORS Technology Development for Future Capabilities and to Help Support the Industrial Base in the ORS Area
• 75 Proposals were Received from Industry and Evaluated using an Army SMDC, AFRL, and NRL Joint Evaluation Process
– Achieved Solid Consensus and Selected 15 Proposals for Award with OSD and STRATCOM Concurrence
• These Contracts are All in Place and Industry will be Developing Over the Course of the Next Year
• NRL is the Program Manager of this Initiative for OSD– Chris Huffine and LCDR Joe Gherlone are Primary Contract CORs
.11
ORS Payload Technologies Awarded
BALL L-Band Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR)
Goodrich Airborne (U2) EO/IR Sensor for ORS
ATC RF Digital Payload (Software Reprogrammable Radio selected among five proposals across the Moderate and Complex categories)
CTD Light Weight Large Composite Reflector for ORS
SEAKR Reprogrammable Space Network Interface Card
ICS Autonomous Tasking and Checkout of Responsive Space Payloads
JHUAPL “WISPER” - Wafer Integrated Spectrometer (SAA mission oriented) - also provides an AF FalconSat payload
Raytheon “Skidmore POD” - advanced Hyperspectral payload technology
SPACEDEV CORRI - Combined Optical, Radio, Radar
MSI UIE - Universal Payload Electronics
AMASST Enhancing Space Control with Structured Light Sensor
GD-AIS HIGHRISE (HI RES Imaging Sensor and Exploitation)
SSGINC Manufacturing Techniques for ORS
JHUAPL Self Heal CD&H (for Commercial Electronics Use In Space)
INNOFLIGHT IP Transceiver Experiment
Table 1. ORS Payload Technology Awards
COMPLEX CATEGORY ($2.0M<complex<$5M)
MODERATE CATEGORY ($0.5M<moderate<2.0M)
BASIC CATEGORY (<=$0.5M)
.12
Joint Evaluation and Award Summary
So Good Consensus was Achieved Resulting in the Top Picks of Each Department being Awarded Almost Evenly
0123456789
Number ofFirst
ChoicesAwarded
Number ofFirst orSecondChoicesAwarded
Number ofFirst,
Second,or ThirdChoicesAwarded
Number ofFirst,
Second,Third, orFourth
ChoicesAwarded
Army
Air Force
Naval
Out of 15 Total Awards
.13
Spacecraft Bus Standards Initiatives
.14
Four Phase Bus Standards Development
• Phase 1 – Analysis and Team Building (MIT/LL Led)
• Phase 2 – Test Bed and Standard Avionics (AFRL Led) – also “Modular Bus”
• Phase 3 – Gov’t / Industry Prototype Standard Bus System Development– Naval Research Lab (NRL) and JHU Applied Physics Lab (APL) Led
• Phase 4 – Production Phase (SMC Led)
All Phases Supported by the Nation’s Collective System Engineering Expertise
System Engineering Working Group
(Government, Industry, Academia)
PHASE 3NRL/APL LEAD
Spacecraft System Design
Core Architecture
PHASE 4PHASE 4SMC LEADSMC LEAD
ProductionQuantity Bus Buys
PHASE 2AFRL LEAD
Bus Technology & Standards Insertion
and Test Bed
General Officer/Lab Director Steering Group
PHASE 1MIT/LL LEAD
Analysis
Bus forTacSat-3
Bus forTacSat-4
.15
Relationship to Other Standards Working Groups
• On-going Standards Development will Continue• OSD Initiative Focused on Getting to Initial Buy and Setting Up a Sound Spiral Process
Long TermVisions
RSATAFRL Plug & Play WGs
Others
NASA Modular Bus WG
PHASE 3NRL/APL LEAD
Spacecraft System Design
Core Architecture
PHASE 4PHASE 4SMC LEADSMC LEAD
ProductionQuantity Bus Buys
PHASE 2AFRL LEAD
Bus Technology & Standards Insertion
and Test Bed
PHASE 1MIT/LL LEAD
Analysis
AIAA Standards
Long Term Technology (S&T) Oriented Efforts
Consortium
Standards/Technology
for TacSat-4 and
1st SMC ORS/JWS Buy
Ready-to-Aggressive
Standards/Tech.
for TacSat-3 Experiment
Ready
Standards/Tech.
for 2nd
ORS/JWS Buy
.16
Bus Standards May Provide Good Opportunity for ORS and NSF Collaboration
• Achieving Broad Acceptance and Volume is a Key to Success of Any Standards
• Generally these ORS Bus Standards Complimentary STP SIV Bus Standards Nicely In Terms of Size, Weight, Power and Cost Class of Bus
– SIV Spacecraft ~180kg; ORS Spacecraft ~400kg (buses are about half)
• AFRL Led Plug-and-Play Standards Work Generally Supports Component Level Standardization and is Well Suited for All Cost Classes
• Reference Paper is in AIAA Responsive Space Conference #5 April 2007 Paper #2007-4001 which Includes web Links to Standards Documents Etc
– “Phase 3” Documents are at: https://projects.nrl.navy.mil/busstandards/index.php
.17
Joint ORS Office and Community
.18
ORS Office Standup is May 21, 2007. Properly setting up the core office relationships, incentives, and authorities is probably the biggest current
challenge effecting long term success of ORS.
ORS Core Office and Broader Community
ORS
Core
Acquisition
Operations Support
S&TCOCOM/User Support
Concepts/ Solutions
• OSD/DR&E• Service Labs, DARPA• Other gov’t orgs
• TENCAP• Battle Labs• JFC• Doctrine• Wargames• Exercises• Mod/Sim
•Service/agencies acquisition orgs•UAVs/Airborne payloads
• USSTRATCOM• Components• COCOMS
•JFCCs•SDTW•Blossom Pt•Force providers
•Coalition
Span of Control ……………………. Span of Influence
•Academia
Defense Civil
CommercialIntelligence
ORS
Core
Acquisition
Operations Support
S&TCOCOM/User Support
Concepts/ Solutions
• OSD/DR&E• Service Labs, DARPA• Other gov’t orgs
• TENCAP• Battle Labs• JFC• Doctrine• Wargames• Exercises• Mod/Sim
•Service/agencies acquisition orgs•UAVs/Airborne payloads
• USSTRATCOM• Components• COCOMS
•JFCCs•SDTW•Blossom Pt•Force providers
•Coalition
Span of Control ……………………. Span of Influence
•Academia
Defense Civil
CommercialIntelligence
.19
Core Office Design Essential to Reduce Inertia Required to Move from Needs to Capabilities
ORS Office Formally Includes All Key Functions to Increase Information Flow and Reduce Inertia Needed to Transition Through Each Community
Op
era
tiona
l Nee
d
RqmtsProcess
Informed Development
AcquisitionProcess
Pro
perly
Und
erst
ood
& D
ocum
ente
d R
qmt
Ena
blin
g T
ech
/ N
ewC
apab
ility
Dev
elop
ed
Ne
w C
ap
abili
ty
Acq
uir
edTransition
To Space OpsForce
Training
Op
era
tiona
l Use
Op
era
tiona
l S
yste
m A
vaila
ble
Ser
vice
Rq
mts
D
ivis
ion
s
S&
T/R
&D
C
om
mu
nit
y
DoD
& N
atio
nal
Ops
Com
mun
ity
CO
CO
M S
up
port
S
erv
ices
Gov
t A
cq &
In
dust
ry
.20
Conclusions
• ORS is Maturing from All S&T/R&D Efforts to Now Include COCOM Support, Acquisition and Operations Arms in a Formal Office Construct
– The Joint ORS Office Standup will Occur May 21, 2007
• TacSat Experiments are Intended to Co-Evolve Concepts and Technologies to Spiral Operational Capabilities and Inform Acquisition
– Although Not Their Main Focus, TacSats may have Potential for NSF
• Expect NSF-ORS Technology Development Collaboration would be Productive
– ORS S&T Vector #2– ORS Payload Technology Development Initiative
• Achieving Broad Acceptance and Volume is a Key to Success for the Spacecraft Bus Standards
– Would be Great to See Some ORS and NFS Collaboration with these Bus Standards