Open Space Extrinsic Material - Moreton Bay Region...Open Space Extrinsic Material - 2017 3 1.0 Preliminary The Moreton Bay Region has a diverse and complementary network of open space

Local Government Infrastructure Plan 2017Open Space Extrinsic Material

Open Space Extrinsic Material - 2017 1

Version control

Version Revision date Author Description and reason for change

1 June 2016 Lisa Kubler Version 1

2 August 2016 Gen Denny Minor changes as part of first compliance check


Contents

1.0 Preliminary .................................................................................................................................. 3

1.1 Open space network ............................................................................................................... 3

1.2 Why is open space important? ............................................................................................... 4

1.3 Open Space Strategy 2012-2031 ............................................................................................. 4

2.0 Service catchments ..................................................................................................................... 5

3.0 Demand assumptions and conversions ...................................................................................... 6

4.0 Desired standards of service ....................................................................................................... 6

4.1 Overview ................................................................................................................................. 6

4.2 Desired standards of service ................................................................................................... 7

5.0 Definition of trunk infrastructure ............................................................................................. 10

6.0 Network planning and modelling .............................................................................................. 11

6.1 Network principles ................................................................................................................ 12

6.2 Opportunities to meet user needs ........................................................................................ 12

6.3 Catchment analysis ............................................................................................................... 12

6.4 Amendments to catchment analysis ..................................................................................... 14

7.0 Network costings and valuation methodology ......................................................................... 14

7.1 Value of existing assets ......................................................................................................... 14

7.2 Cost estimates for future open space recommendations .................................................... 15

7.3 Exclusions from LGIP cost and contribution calculations ..................................................... 17

8.0 Schedule of works ..................................................................................................................... 18

9.0 Source and supporting documents ........................................................................................... 37


1.0 Preliminary

The Moreton Bay Region has a diverse and complementary network of open space ranging from

recreation parks, sports fields and civic spaces to linear linkages, natural bushland and conservation

areas. Many of these spaces are provided and managed by the Moreton Bay Regional Council

(‘Council’) for the benefit of the public.

The region’s population is currently over 380,000 people. This is projected to increase by around

150,000 residents by 2031, with growth to occur across a number of communities in the region. This

growth will place considerable pressure on the region’s open spaces to expand and adapt to

changing community preferences. Council must responsibly manage this growth and identify future

open space infrastructure requirements to meet this increasing demand.

The Moreton Bay Regional Council Local Government Infrastructure Plan (‘LGIP’) identifies Council’s

plans for trunk open space infrastructure to service future growth in an effective and financially

responsible manner. This report provides the background information for the open space network,

to support the development of the LGIP.

The report outlines:

1. The service catchments (Section 2);

2. The demand assumptions and conversions (Section 3);

3. The desired standards of service (Section 4);

4. The definition of trunk infrastructure (Section 5);

5. Network planning and modelling (Section 6);

6. Network costing and valuation methodology (Section 7);

7. Schedule of works (Section 8); and

8. Source and supporting documents (Section 9).

1.1 Open space network

Council plans, delivers and maintains a wide variety of both trunk and non-trunk open space across

the region. These areas support a variety of active and passive recreation opportunities, and include

the following open space types:

Recreation parks

Recreation parks offer many different experiences including areas to kick a ball, play on swings,

exercise your dog or just have a picnic and socialise. They range from local, district and regional

recreation parks to the extensive foreshore areas within the region. Recreation parks are generally

considered to be trunk infrastructure, provided they meet the definition outlined in Section 5 below.

Sports parks

Sports parks offer users the opportunity to play their favourite organised sports. These parks may

have a range of fields, courts and surfaces and are often some of the most well used parks in the

region. They may include other facilities like club houses, change rooms, lighting and car parking.

Sports parks are generally considered to be trunk infrastructure, as outlined in Section 5 below.


Civic parks

Civic parks are often referred to as plazas, town squares or public spaces. They provide important

areas for people to relax, eat lunch, meet friends or attend events. They may also offer facilities such

as playgrounds, shade and seating areas. They are designed to provide amenity in our centres and

create destinations that people are attracted to. Civic parks are generally considered to be trunk

infrastructure, as outlined in Section 5 below.

Other open spaces

Council also plans, delivers and manages a number of other open space types in the region, such as

linear linkage parks, bushland recreation parks and conservation areas. These open space types are

not considered as part of the trunk open space network (as identified in Section 5 below) however

may be included as part of the stormwater and active transport networks where appropriate (i.e.

some linear linkage parks have been more appropriately included in the stormwater and active

transport networks as often their primary function is not the provision of open space).

1.2 Why is open space important?

Investing in open space is a long-term investment in Moreton Bay’s sustainable future. This

investment will create a thriving region where people want to live, work and play. Great open spaces

help to give our communities their unique identity and local citizens a sense of civic pride.

Research has shown that proximity to well-designed and managed parks and green spaces results in

higher property values and has a positive influence on business performance, investor confidence,

lifestyle, health, enhanced character and biodiversity.

Cities, towns and regions that invest in and maintain high-quality public open space look better, feel

better and work better. Prioritising investment in open spaces is not just about aesthetics. It also

helps to resolve health problems and promotes active transport and community development.

Great open space makes for a better quality of life. A network of well-designed and cared-for open

spaces adds to the character of places where people want to live, work and visit. Open spaces also

provide the vital green infrastructure that enables us to deal with floods or mitigate and adapt to

climate change while providing wildlife habitats, sporting facilities or attractive parks.

1.3 Open Space Strategy 2012-2031

Council has developed an Open Space Strategy as part of an integrated framework that seeks to

effectively manage the current and future provision of Council owned or managed open space in the

region. This Strategy is supported by a number of Plans, including the Urban Recreation Park Plan

2012-2031 and Interim Sports Facilities Plan 2012-2031.

The Open Space Strategy and associated Plans tell us how, where and when Council should provide

open space infrastructure. The determination of the how, where and when is in part influenced by

State Government policies and other policies within the local government.

The Open Space Strategy and associated Plans are the first review of Council’s open space network

since the amalgamation of the three former local governments in 2008. They incorporate new


Moreton Bay Regional Council policy, such as the Community Plan 2011-2021 and the Strategic

Framework, and significant changes to State Government policy such as the South East Queensland

Regional Plan 2009-2031.

The Open Space Strategy and associated Plans have informed the preparation of LGIP by identifying

new and upgraded facilities required to meet changing community needs, and determining when

and how these facilities will be provided.

2.0 Service catchments

The open space network service catchments have been determined through the development of the

following documents:

Open Space Strategy 2012-2031

Urban Recreation Park Plan 2012-2031

Interim Sports Facilities Plan 2012-2031

Catchment planning for the open space network was undertaken by dividing the region into five

district catchments. The boundaries of the district catchments were based on the Moreton Bay

Regional Council Planning Scheme Strategic Framework planning areas. Some minor changes to the

boundaries were made where required for the purposes of open space network planning, such as

the division between urban and rural areas in the Strategic Framework. These district catchment

areas generally service distinct populations with higher order roads, waterways and environmental

areas and the extent of the urban area generally providing logical catchment boundaries for district

level facilities. It is these district catchments that have been used for the purposes of the LGIP.

The following figure shows the Moreton Bay Region district catchment boundaries.

Figure 1 - LGIP open space network service catchment


3.0 Demand assumptions and conversions

The population assumptions used to undertake catchment planning for the open space network, as

identified in the Urban Recreation Park Plan 2012-2031 and Interim Sports Facilities Plan 2012-2031,

are based on the Moreton Bay Regional Council Planning Assumptions (as at 6 August 2013). These

population assumptions draw on a number of sources, including existing and committed

development, planning intentions such as the SEQ Regional Plan, strategic planning projects and the

place types from the Strategic Framework, growth forecasts such as the urban growth model and

population forecasts from OESR, and land suitability and compatibility to accommodate growth.

While desired standards have been included below for open space provision in enterprise and

employment areas, limited analysis of employment projections has been undertaken as part of the

open space network planning. As such, no employment projections have been included for the

purposes of the development of the LGIP. Further analysis of open space provision in these areas will

be undertaken and incorporated into future revisions of the LGIP as required.

The base year for the planning for the network is 2011, with a planning horizon of 20 years to 2031,

aligning with the latest ABS Census data available.

The following table of existing and projected demand for open space has been used for the

development of the LGIP.

Table 1 — Existing and projected demand for the open space network

Service catchment Existing and projected demand (persons)

2011 2016 2021 2026 2031

Caboolture 68,939 79,303 88,994 93,481 99,753

Coastal Communities and Bribie Island

31,313 32,968 34,127 34,245 34,403

North Lakes - Redcliffe - Moreton Bay Rail Corridor

163,178 179,925 202,663 221,715 230,419

Rural 31,574 34,959 37,787 40,044 42,474

Strathpine 86,647 92,754 95,050 98,732 103,685

Moreton Bay Region 381,651 419,909 458,621 488,217 510,734

More detailed population projection data can be found in the Urban Recreation Park Analysis and

Sports Park Analysis spreadsheets as identified in the supporting documents below.

4.0 Desired standards of service

The open space network desired standards of service (DSS) were determined through the

development of the following documents:

Urban Recreation Park Plan – Appendix B – Desired Standards of Service

Interim Sports Facilities Plan – Appendix A - Desired Standards of Service

4.1 Overview

To develop the desired standards of service, Council used a combination of network analysis and

open space planning resources. A number of resources were used to inform the standards for the


network, including reviewing standards from other local governments and the ULDA Open Space

Planning Guidelines.

A desktop review of the existing open space network was undertaken to understand the types,

quantity and distribution of open spaces, their role, function and relationship between the places in

which they are located.

Through the desktop analysis, collaboration with internal stakeholders and after undertaking open

space planning research, there was recognition in the merit of transitioning from a standards

approach to a needs based approach to open space planning. The needs based approach considers

the demographic and physical characteristics of a geographic area to guide future development of

parks and infrastructure. This may include the social composition of an area, the leisure and

recreation preferences and the type and quantity of open spaces to serve those needs. This

approach ensures that parks provide the activities and services which the community will ultimately

desire and utilise, in turn providing greater community benefit and ensuring the effective and

efficient use of public funds.

However, Council still requires desired standards to fulfil its legislative requirements, financial

planning, infrastructure planning and to deliver open spaces through the planning and development

framework. The intent was to develop more flexible standards which account for the needs of

typical neighbourhoods and communities through a number of approaches, to ensure that places

can continue to change and adapt over time to meet user needs.

Further information regarding the open space desired standards of service can be found in the

Urban Recreation Park Plan 2012-2031 and the Interim Sports Facilities Plan 2012-2031.

4.2 Desired standards of service

The open space network desired standards of service, for the purposes of the LGIP, are as follows

(note the reference to community infrastructure is included in these desired standards as they have

been incorporated together for the purposes of desired standards for the LGIP. Further information

and additional desired standards specific to community facilities can be found in the Background

Information for the Community Facilities Network report):

a) Provide an accessible network of open space and community facilities that meets the needs of

residents and visitors in accordance with the accessibility standards in Table 2 and rates of

provision identified in Table 3. The targets identify the expected quantum of land required to

meet community demands for open space and community facilities, based on rate of

population, and are related to the place types:

i. AC: Activity Centre

ii. UN: Urban Neighbourhood

iii. NGN: Next Generation Neighbourhood

iv. SN: Suburban Neighbourhood

v. RR: Rural Residential

vi. RT: Rural Township

vii. CC: Coastal Communities

viii. R: Rural


ix. MFW: Mountain Ranges, Forests and Waterways

x. KER: Key Extractive Resource Areas

xi. CR: Coast and Riverlands

xii. EEA: Enterprise and Employment Areas

xiii. SA: Special Areas

b) The provision targets in Table 3 are intended to be flexible, as many parks provide a number of

functions to the community and service varying areas however the minimum land area of the

park is to be maintained.

c) Ensure land for open space and community facilities has:

i. a minimum land area as identified in the Table 3;

ii. a configuration, slope, and acceptable level of flood immunity in accordance with the

standards identified in Table 4 as well as Council’s adopted standards identified in the

planning scheme.

d) Embellish open space to complement the type and purpose of the park as identified in Table 5:

i. LR: Local Recreation Park (including

Foreshore)

ii. DR: District Recreation Park

(including Foreshore)

iii. RR: Regional Recreation Park

(including Foreshore)

iv. DS: District Sport Park

v. RS: Regional Sport Park

vi. DC: District Civic Park

vii. RC: Regional Civic Park.

Table 2 — Accessibility standards for open space

Park type Place type Accessibility

standard AC UN NGN SN RR RT CC R MFW KER CR EEA SA

Local

Recreation Park

400m

800m

No standard

District

Recreation Park

2.5km

3.5km

No standard

Regional

Recreation Park 10km

District

Sports Park

3km

5km

No standard

Regional Sports

Park 15km

District Civic

Park

Within district centre

No standard

Regional Civic

Park Within major centre

No standard

Note - The accessibility standard is measured "as the crow flies"


Table 3 — Rate of land provision for open space

Park type Place type Provision

target

Minimum

land area AC UN NGN SN RR RT CC R MFW KER CR EEA SA

Local Recreation

Park

1ha/1000

persons

0.5ha 0.5ha/1000

persons

Where

required

District

Recreation Park

0.6ha/1000

persons 4ha

Regional

Recreation Park

0.5ha/1000

persons 10ha

District Sports

Park

0.8ha/1000

persons 20ha

Regional Sports

Park

0.4ha/1000

persons 40ha

District Civic

Park

1 per district

centre 1,000m2

No provision -

Regional Civic

Park

1 per major

centre 6,000m2

No provision -

Table 4 — Open space design requirements

Park type

Width to

depth

ratio

Min.

width

Min. road

frontage

Road

type

No. access

points Flood immunity

Local

Recreation

Park

0.5 20m 40% Collector

or lower 1

100% of land above

2% AEP

District

Recreation

Park

0.75 30m 30% Collector

or higher 2

80% of land and all

internal roads and car

parking above 2% AEP

Regional

Recreation

Park

0.75 30m 30% Arterial

or higher 3

50% of land and all

formal recreation

areas, internal roads

and vehicle parking

above 2% AEP

District

Sports Park Square or

otherwise

compact overall

shape

Accessible by public

transport, bikeways

and major roads

All playing

fields/courts

have

adequate

access

- All buildings above 1% AEP

- Formal recreation areas, internal roads, hard courts and vehicle parking above 2% AEP

- All playing fields above 5% AEP

Regional

Sports Park


District Civic

Park Site specific

30% Site

specific

1 100% of land above

1% AEP Regional Civic

Park 40% 1

Table 5 — Standard facilities/embellishments for open space

Opportunities/facilities LR DR RR DS RS DC RC

Private vehicle movement and internal parking

Play areas (large)

Play areas (small)

Cycling & walking opportunities

Nature appreciation opportunities

Multi-use activity space

Performance/community/festival/event space

Formal sports fields/courts/surface (lighting & irrigation)

Picnic areas

Gateway statement

Kick-a-bout spaces

Passive recreation nodes

BMX/skate opportunities

Youth spaces

Seating opportunities

Outdoor recreation opportunities

Dog off leash area

Social gathering spaces

Paddle and recreational boating facilities

Fitness nodes

Public amenities (toilets)

Changing facilities (sports)

Natural areas

Drinking fountains

BBQ

5.0 Definition of trunk infrastructure

Trunk infrastructure includes those elements of a strategic network necessary to service urban

development at the desired standard of service in a coordinated, efficient and financially sustainable

manner. The Statutory Guideline 03/14 – Local Government Infrastructure Plans identifies land and

embellishments for local, district and metropolitan recreation parks and district and metropolitan

sports parks as indicative open space trunk infrastructure.

The Open Space Strategy outlines Council’s classification of parks across the region. These

classifications have been determined based on existing park classifications and a review of other

South East Queensland local government standards. Of note, ‘metropolitan’ level parks as indicated

in the guideline are generally referred to as ‘regional’ parks in the Open Space Strategy

classifications. Furthermore, recreation parks have been further classified as either ‘recreation’,

‘foreshore’ or ‘civic’ parks, based on their role and location in the network. Each of the recreation


type open spaces requires different desired standards and levels of embellishment as they provide a

variety of recreation uses to the community.

The following park types are considered to be open space trunk infrastructure:

- Sports parks:

Regional level;

District level;

Embellishments including sports fields, shade structures, car parking.

- Recreation parks:

Regional level including Regional Civic Park and Regional Foreshore Park;

District level, including District Civic Park and District Foreshore Park;

Local Parks (including Foreshore), serving more than 350 dwellings, meeting the DSS, and

where not located within 800 metres of another local or higher order park.

Embellishments including shade structures, playgrounds.

These open space trunk infrastructure park types generally provide an open space function for a

wider catchment, servicing multiple development sites and users.

Of note, the definition of trunk infrastructure does not include local level sports parks or civic parks.

While there are a number of these parks currently servicing the community, the Open Space

Strategy indicates that future provision of these local level facilities is not desirable, with

expenditure to be focused on district and regional facilities in the future where economies of scale in

management and maintenance can be achieved.

The Open Space Strategy also identifies open space classifications that are not included in the above

trunk infrastructure definition. These open space areas are not considered open space trunk

infrastructure for the purposes of the LGIP as they are generally either required for a local purpose

and not for a wider catchment, or their primary purpose is not open space (i.e. linear parks have not

been included in the definition of open space trunk infrastructure, as although they provide an

important open space function within the region, their primary role is for stormwater purposes

and/or active transport and as such been more appropriately included within the stormwater trunk

infrastructure definitions).

6.0 Network planning and modelling

The open space network planning and modelling was undertaken as part of the development of the

following documents:

Urban Recreation Park Plan – Appendix C – Catchment Profiles

Interim Sports Facilities Plan – Appendix B - Catchment Profiles


6.1 Network principles

The Open Space Strategy sets out the fundamental principles for the planning and design of the

Moreton Bay region’s open space network that have been used to undertake network planning.

These principles include:

Relative to place - open space will be planned and designed to relate to location and setting.

Diversity - the open space network will provide a range of passive, active and structured

recreation opportunities in a range of settings and locations.

Connected and accessible - the open space network will be connected through a green

network of corridors and spaces to facilitate access and encourage use.

Safe - open space will be designed and located to provide safe recreational spaces

Sustainable - the open space network will be planned and designed to balance costs with the

service standards expected by both Council and the community.

Fit for purpose - The design of open space will be conducive to facilitating the required

infrastructure and recreational activities and opportunities expected for that open space

type.

Further information on the network principles for open space provision can be found in the Open

Space Strategy 2012-2031.

6.2 Opportunities to meet user needs

Council is responding to user needs by creating attractive parks and open spaces that people will

want to use and enjoy. In such a large region, people’s needs for open space vary depending on

social factors, physical fitness, sports and leisure preferences and location. Council is responding by

providing better parks and facilities using the following themes:

Our park, our place – residents take great pride in their neighbourhoods. It is important that

parks complement the places we live and provide the activities which we expect. Council will

plan spaces that relate to locations by understanding the needs of people and the future

vision of these places.

Connecting people to places – the region has a good network of open spaces. Council will

create accessible parks and open spaces for all members of the community. By doing this we

can create healthy communities and increase access to open spaces and destinations.

Multipurpose and adaptable places – people’s needs for parks and open spaces change over

time. Parks also need to make the best use of space as the area undergoes growth.

Diversity of places and activities – a diverse community has equally diverse expectations for

parks and open space. There is an opportunity for Council to plan for a variety of sports,

recreation activities and facilities across a number of locations.

6.3 Catchment analysis

To complete a thorough assessment of the existing and future open space network in the region,

and identify financially sustainable future infrastructure requirements, the following steps were

undertaken on a local, district and regional catchment basis. From this analysis, priority projects


were identified for inclusion in the schedule of works (see Section 8). Further information regarding

catchment profiling can be found in the Urban Recreation Parks Plan 2012-2031 and the Interim

Sports Facilities Plan 2012-2031.

Step 1: Map and classify all existing open space in the region

A GIS layer containing all existing open space in the region was established using existing databases.

Each existing park was allocated a classification by assessing the particular characteristics of that

park against the definitions included in the Open Space Strategy 2012-2031.

Step 2: Assess existing provision of open space

To assess the existing provision and quality of open space within the region, a five stage process was

established:

1. Demographic analysis – a brief demographic analysis was used to identify the dominant

features of the age profile which helps inform the appropriate embellishment to parks.

2. Accessibility analysis – an accessibility analysis of open space opportunities was undertaken

in each catchment to identify potential shortfalls in the distribution of open space across the

region. The analysis identified residential parcels that exceeded the accessibility thresholds

in each catchment.

3. Function analysis – a function analysis looked at the roles and functions within each

catchment’s open space network, having regard to the existing embellishment levels and

constraints for further development. The analysis matched the available facilities to the age

profiles and identified shortfalls in the existing network.

4. A desired rate of provision - the existing open space network was assessed against the

desired rates of provision contained within the DSS for each park type. Population

assumptions for 2011 were used to determine population rates. This provided a broad

assessment of the current capacity or shortfall in the network.

5. Solutions – series of solution sets for each catchment were identified which demonstrated

the desired standards of service. Where possible, opportunities to upgrade existing open

space areas to meet existing demand requirements were identified to reduce further land

acquisition requirements.

Step 3: Assess future open space requirements

To assess future open space requirements, a four stage process was established.

1. Review the strategic land use direction – this involved a review of the anticipated residential

and employment growth unique to each catchment and consideration of how the relevant

place types for each catchment influenced the open space outcomes.

2. Population projections – population projections to 2031 were used to identify the extent of

growth and the spread of that growth across the catchment.

3. A desired rate of provision - the future open space network was assessed against the desired

rates of provision contained within the DSS for each park type. This provided a broad

assessment of the future capacity or shortfall in the network.

4. Solutions – a series of solution sets for each catchment were identified which demonstrated

the desired standards of service. Where possible, opportunities to upgrade existing open


space areas to meet future demand requirements were identified to reduce additional land

acquisition requirements.

Step 4: Costing

Estimated costs for future open space recommendations were determined to assess the financial

sustainability of the recommendations. See below for detail on how costings were calculated.

Step 5: Prioritisation

Prioritisation of new urban recreation parks and upgrades was based on the population growth

assumptions for the region.

6.4 Amendments to catchment analysis

Since the development of the Open Space Strategy, Urban Recreation Park Plan and Interim Sports

Facilities Plan, several recommendation changes have been made that have been incorporated into

the LGIP recommendations and schedule of works below. These recommendation changes,

identified in the development phase of the LGIP, include the following:

Projects being completed or still in the investigation phase - these future investigations have

been excluded from the LGIP schedule of works as further analysis is required to determine

the future need for these projects;

Recommendations made in the catchment profiling process that are located outside of the

priority infrastructure area have been excluded from the LGIP.

These projects are identified as non-trunk in the Urban Recreation Park Analysis and Sports Park

Analysis spreadsheets referenced in Section 9 below. The need for a local recreation park in

Murrumba Downs that was not previously identified in the Urban Recreation Park Plan has also been

highlighted and included in the LGIP.

7.0 Network costings and valuation methodology

The following steps were undertaken to determine the costs associated with the provision of the

open space network.

7.1 Value of existing assets

Land values

All existing open space land was attached to a hierarchy and valued using suburb based land

valuations provided by external consultants (for more information see detail below regarding future

infrastructure costing and Section 9 for document references).

Suburb based land valuation was based on three value categories:

land above 1% AEP (Q100);

land between 2% AEP and 1% AEP (Q50 and Q100); and

land below 2% AEP (Q50).


An average cost per square metre was determined from these three valuations and applied to all

land in the existing open space network.

Around 66% of the existing trunk open space network is located above the 1% AEP, with around 33%

below the 2% AEP. Using an average land valuation as described above generally reflects the balance

of constrained and unconstrained land in the network and is considered sufficient for the purposes

of the schedule of works model.

Embellishments

Existing open space embellishments were identified from Council’s Geographical Information System,

translated into specific assets on Council's Financial Asset Register, and costed by applying standard

unit rates supplied by Council’s operational staff who estimated the approximate cost of installing

and supplying the items.

Where no unit rate was available, assets were valued using the replacement cost value entered into

the asset register, or if no asset data was captured in the register, an average of all active assets for

the specific type of asset was used.

Some assets were considered non-financial and excluded from valuation as per the standard asset

valuation guidelines Council practices, including:

All park assets below $5k (including

park furniture and fences etc.)

All land improvement assets below

$5k (including retaining walls etc.)

Pathways less than 10m length

(excluding kerb ramps)

Concrete slabs

Edging

Arbours

Landscaping including trees, turf etc.

Banana bars

Banner and flag poles

Signs

Softfall

Water hydrants

Taps

Where no valuation was possible assets were considered non-financial (e.g. most artwork).

7.2 Cost estimates for future open space recommendations

Land values

Suburb based and place based land valuations for future parks were obtained from Opteon in 2012-

13 (see Section 9 below for document references).

The Place Type values were market based using sales of land identified in most of the categories. The

values provided included value ranges, an average cost per m2, and constrained land values. In the

Place Types where no suitable market evidence was available, these were assessed in relativity with

the other Place Types. The assessments of Place Types of rural nature were based on rural site

values. The Place Types in urban land were assessed as if the land was undeveloped (i.e. in an

englobo state). A constrained land value ($/m²) was given to areas which were constrained by

factors outside the control of the land holder e.g. powerline easements, protected vegetation, koala


corridors and flooding. The values of some lands such as large rural lots have not been affected by

these limitations.

Suburb based land valuations were obtained for each of the three former local government areas of

Caboolture, Redcliffe and Pine Rivers. The values provide the value of lands in the following four

categories:

above Q100 flood level,

storm surge affected land,

land between Q50 and Q100 flood level and

land below Q50 flood level.

In the urban footprint the suburb values were equivalent to the value of englobo residential values

(i.e. land held in large parcels suitable for subdivision to residential allotments). In the case of rural

and rural residential lands, the suburb value was in line with values of the surrounding allotments.

These suburb and Place Type land valuations were analysed to determine a Place Type and suburb

valuation per m2 based on the mean, ranges and averages for constrained and unconstrained land

(see the Open Space Land Values spreadsheet as referenced in Section 9 below). Future open space

recommendations requiring land acquisition as outlined in the schedule of works below were given a

land value based on this per m2 rate and the amount of land required as per the desired standards of

service rate of provision.

Embellishments

Estimated embellishment costs for new recreation and civic parks and upgrades to existing

recreation and civic parks were determined by establishing unit rates for individual infrastructure

items. These unit rates were drawn from the following sources:

Landscape Queensland “Costing Guide” 6th edition

Rawlinsons Construction Cost Guide 2012

LocalBuy preferred suppliers cost estimates

Council's Engineering, Construction & Maintenance Division cost estimates based on

previous provision

A detailed breakdown of unit costs and sources can be found in the Urban Recreation Cost Estimates

as identified in Section 9 below.

The level of embellishment for each park type, and therefore associated cost, was determined by

using the desired standards of service to indicate appropriate embellishment requirements. For new

parks, the cost was based on the provision of all embellishments and works required to deliver the

park to the community. For recommended upgrades to existing parks, a site based review of each

park was undertaken to determine which embellishments were required to meet desired standards,

with costs included only for the provision of these additional infrastructure items.

A detailed breakdown of cost calculations for each recreation open space recommendation can be

found in the following documents, as identified in Section 9 below:

Urban Recreation Cost Estimates – District and Regional Recreation


Urban Recreation Cost Estimates – Local Recreation

Urban Recreation Cost Estimates – Foreshore

Urban Recreation Cost Estimates – Civic

The establishment costs outlined above do not include an allowance for project owner’s costs and

contingency. These costs have been added through the schedule of works model.

Future sports facility costings were generally based on existing master plan or budgeted costings

where available or estimated costs based on existing facilities of a similar scale and design. Where

no existing master plan cost or similar facility estimate was available, an estimated cost per hectare

was applied for regional and district scale facilities.

A detailed breakdown of unit costs and sources can be found in the Sports Park Cost Estimates as

identified in Section 9 below, while a detailed breakdown of cost calculations for each sports park

recommendation can be found in the Sports Park Cost Estimates.

Since the development of the Interim Sports Facilities Plan, further detailed planning work has been

undertaken to refine sports recommendations across the region, including refinement of the

estimated costs. Where available, these revised costings have been included in the LGIP costings as

the best available information at this time. The timing of delivery for several sports facility projects

has also been amended to incorporate staging of the development of the facility as identified in the

revised sports facility planning.

The establishment costs outlined above do not include an allowance for project owner’s costs and

contingency. These costs have been added through the schedule of works model.

Embellishment costs are current as at 2012. Escalation has not been considered at the initial costing

stage, as this is dealt with in the schedule of works model.

7.3 Exclusions from LGIP cost and contribution calculations

North Lakes DCP

The North Lakes development area is administered under a separate Development Control

Infrastructure Plan outside the MBRC Planning Scheme. As such, it is administered separately from

the Priority Infrastructure Area (PIA). As some proposed open space facilities within the North Lakes

area are designed to serve the needs of users beyond North Lakes, they are included in the schedule

of works to ensure a complete network to service growth.

Caboolture West

The Caboolture West area was identified in the SEQ Regional Plan 2009-2031 as an identified growth

area outside the urban footprint. Since that time, it has been subject of Master Planning to

determine the extent of area affected, and the desired nature, intensity, distribution and sequence

of land uses. This area is now included in the MBRC Planning Scheme in the Emerging community

zone.

Caboolture West is not included in the Priority Infrastructure Area at this time, as detailed

infrastructure requirements and responsibilities are still being investigated. Pending resolution of


infrastructure requirements and responsibilities and adoption of the relevant Neighbourhood

Development Plan, urban development within this area would represent a bring-forward of

infrastructure provision. The infrastructure required to service this area is therefore not included in

the schedule of works.

Upon completion of a Neighbourhood Development Plan that includes land subject of a

development application, Council may be prepared to negotiate a voluntary infrastructure

agreement for bring forward infrastructure provision outside the LGIP.

8.0 Schedule of works

The schedule of works describes the future infrastructure assets required to service growth, the

timing of their delivery, and the cost to establish each asset as set out in the table below.


Table 6 — Open space network schedule of works

Item ID

District catchment

Park name Park type Solution Base year (valuation)

Estimated year of completion

Baseline cost (works)*

Baseline cost (land)*

Guideline compliant cost (Land)#

Guideline compliant cost (Embellishments)#

OS-42 Rural Samford Parklands

Regional Recreation

Upgrade 2012 2016 $5,301,040 $0 $0 $7,505,221

OS-66 North Lakes, Redcliffe, Moreton Bay Rail Corridor

Old Petrie Town

Regional Recreation

Upgrade 2012 2016 $672,273 $0 $0 $951,805


Endeavour Park

Regional Foreshore

Upgrade 2012 2016 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $1,415,802


Scarborough Beach Park

Regional Foreshore

Upgrade 2012 2016 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $1,415,802

OS-44 Strathpine South Pine Sporting Complex - Phase 1

Regional Sport

Upgrade 2014 2016 $12,000,000 $0 $0 $16,328,732

OS-43 Caboolture Caboolture District Recreation

District Recreation

New Land & Embellishment

2012 2016 $1,365,390 $3,705,142

$4,503,623 $1,933,121


Sweeney Reserve

District Recreation

Upgrade 2012 2016 $250,000 $0 $0 $353,950

OS-46 Caboolture Parkridge Estate Park

District Recreation

Upgrade 2012 2016 $905,856 $0 $0 $1,282,512

OS-47 Caboolture Platypus Creek Environment

District Recreation

Upgrade 2012 2016 $236,856 $0 $0 $335,341


Item ID

District catchment







al Reserve

OS-23 Caboolture Caboolture Civic District

District Civic New Land & Embellishment

2012 2016 $368,872 $472,595 $574,442 $522,249


Morris Park - Rothwell

District Sport

Upgrade 2012 2016 $6,000,000 $0 $0 $8,494,809

OS-64 Coastal Communities and Bribie Island

Bribie Island Sports Complex

District Sport

Upgrade 2014 2016 $1,240,000 $0 $0 $1,687,302


Dakabin Local Recreation

Local Recreation


2012 2016 $167,439 $465,884 $566,285 $237,060



Local Recreation


2012 2016 $167,439 $463,311 $563,158 $237,060



Local Recreation


2012 2016 $167,439 $469,100 $570,194 $237,060

OS-84 Strathpine Brendale Local Recreation

Local Recreation


2012 2016 $167,439 $556,110 $675,955 $237,060


Griffin Local Recreation

Local Recreation


2012 2016 $167,439 $465,503 $565,822 $237,060


Item ID

District catchment









Local Recreation


2012 2016 $167,439 $465,500 $565,818 $237,060



Local Recreation


2012 2016 $167,439 $465,500 $565,819 $237,060

OS-126 Caboolture Caboolture South Local Recreation

Local Recreation


2012 2016 $167,439 $465,502 $565,820 $237,060


Local Recreation


2012 2016 $167,439 $616,297 $749,113 $237,060

OS-128 Caboolture Upper Caboolture Local Recreation

Local Recreation


2012 2016 $167,439 $387,641 $471,180 $237,060


Local Recreation


2012 2016 $167,439 $465,503 $565,821 $237,060

OS-132 Caboolture Morayfield Local Recreation

Local Recreation


2012 2016 $167,439 $465,501 $565,819 $237,060


Local Recreation


2012 2016 $167,439 $465,501 $565,819 $237,060


Local Recreation


2012 2016 $167,439 $465,501 $565,819 $237,060


Item ID

District catchment








Local Recreation


2012 2016 $167,439 $465,502 $565,821 $237,060

OS-73 Strathpine Leslie Patrick Park

Local Recreation

Upgrade 2012 2016 $95,290 $0 $0 $134,912

OS-76 Strathpine Stanley Street Community Reserve

Local Recreation

Upgrade 2012 2016 $156,510 $0 $0 $221,587

OS-80 Strathpine Baker Street Park

Local Recreation

Upgrade 2012 2016 $138,217 $0 $0 $195,688


Woorim Foreshore

Local Recreation

Upgrade 2012 2016 $134,600 $0 $0 $190,567


Clayton Park (Bellara)

Local Recreation

Upgrade 2012 2016 $95,450 $0 $0 $135,138


Ernest Sendall Park

Local Recreation

Upgrade 2012 2016 $102,180 $0 $0 $144,667


Alice Street Park

Local Recreation

Upgrade 2012 2016 $159,792 $0 $0 $226,234


Huntington Street Park

Local Recreation

Upgrade 2012 2016 $135,290 $0 $0 $191,544


Item ID

District catchment








Bonton Avenue Park

Local Recreation

Upgrade 2012 2016 $165,049 $0 $0 $233,676


Parsons Boulevarde Park

Local Recreation

Upgrade 2012 2016 $156,727 $0 $0 $221,894

OS-118 Strathpine Saraband Drive Reserve (North)

Local Recreation

Upgrade 2012 2016 $118,490 $0 $0 $167,758

OS-120 Strathpine Everest Street Reserve

Local Recreation

Upgrade 2012 2016 $45,240 $0 $0 $64,051

OS-140 Caboolture Macaranga Street Park

Local Recreation

Upgrade 2012 2016 $94,050 $0 $0 $133,156


Kerwalli Street Park

Local Recreation

Upgrade 2012 2016 $91,600 $0 $0 $129,687

OS-149 Caboolture Bernice Street Park

Local Recreation

Upgrade 2012 2016 $52,874 $0 $0 $74,859

OS-150 Caboolture Trinity Way Park

Local Recreation

Upgrade 2012 2016 $159,956 $0 $0 $226,466


Boama Park Local Foreshore

Upgrade 2012 2016 $500,000 $0 $0 $707,901

OS-106 Coastal Communities

Donnybrook Foreshore

Local Foreshore

Upgrade 2012 2016 $560,750 $0 $0 $793,911


Item ID

District catchment







and Bribie Island


Toorbul Esplanade (Foreshore) (North)

Local Foreshore

Upgrade 2012 2016 $590,612 $0 $0 $836,189


Toorbul Esplanade (Foreshore) (South)

Local Foreshore

Upgrade 2012 2016 $175,806 $0 $0 $248,906


Toorbul Community and Sports Centre

District Sport

Upgrade 2012 2016 $500,000 $0 $0 $707,901


Rothwell Park

District Sport

Upgrade 2014 2016 $250,000 $0 $0 $340,182


Langdon Park

District Sport

Upgrade 2014 2016 $800,000 $0 $0 $1,088,582

OS-48 Caboolture CREEC Regional Recreation

Upgrade 2012 2019 $1,885,410 $0 $0 $2,669,366


Strathpine Civic Regional

Regional Civic

Upgrade 2012 2019 $2,132,858 $0 $0 $3,019,704

OS-44 Strathpine South Pine Sporting Complex -

Regional Sport

Upgrade 2014 2019 $10,000,000 $0 $0 $13,607,277


Item ID

District catchment







Phase 2

OS-10 Strathpine Bray Park District Recreation

District Recreation


2012 2019 $1,365,390 $5,529,340

$6,720,947 $1,933,121

OS-21 Caboolture Morayfield District Recreation

District Recreation


2012 2019 $1,365,390 $160,112 $194,617 $1,933,121


Dakabin District Recreation

District Recreation


2012 2019 $1,365,390 $114,363 $139,010 $1,933,121

OS-05 Caboolture Brodies Park (North)

District Recreation

Upgrade 2012 2019 $37,412 $0 $0 $52,968


Bellara District Foreshore

District Foreshore

Upgrade 2012 2019 $593,136 $0 $0 $839,763


Solander Esplanade Park

District Foreshore

Upgrade 2012 2019 $483,655 $0 $0 $684,759

OS-09 Rural Dayboro District Civic

District Civic New Land & Embellishment

2012 2019 $732,820 $325,297 $395,400 $1,037,527


Margate District Civic

District Civic Investigation 2012 2019 $732,820 $366,231 $445,156 $1,037,527


Reserve (Anzac Avenue) - Kallangur



Item ID

District catchment








Brennan Park

District Civic Investigation 2012 2019 $732,820 $0 $0 $1,037,527


Burpengary District Civic


OS-62 Strathpine Warner District Civic


OS-63 Strathpine Albany Creek District Civic


OS-26 Caboolture Caboolture South District Sport

District Sport


2012 2019 $5,000,000 $5,000,000

$6,077,531 $7,079,008


Bob Brock Park

District Sport

Upgrade 2012 2019 $500,000 $0 $0 $707,901


Elizabeth Road Park - Phase 1

District Sport

Investigation 2014 2019 $15,000,000 $0 $0 $20,410,915

OS-75 Strathpine Lawnton Local Recreation

Local Recreation


2012 2019 $167,439 $400,000 $486,203 $237,060

OS-81 Strathpine Strathpine Local Recreation

Local Recreation


2012 2019 $167,439 $10,969 $13,333 $237,060


Item ID

District catchment







OS-83 Strathpine Strathpine Local Recreation

Local Recreation


2012 2019 $167,439 $592,662 $720,384 $237,060



Local Recreation


2012 2019 $167,439 $465,502 $565,821 $237,060



Local Recreation


2012 2019 $167,439 $465,503 $565,822 $237,060



Local Recreation


2012 2019 $167,439 $465,505 $565,824 $237,060



Local Recreation


2012 2019 $167,439 $465,501 $565,820 $237,060



Local Recreation


2012 2019 $167,439 $465,502 $565,820 $237,060

OS-94 Strathpine Lawnton Local Recreation

Local Recreation


2012 2019 $167,439 $97,911 $119,012 $237,060


Banksia Beach Local Recreation

Local Recreation


2012 2019 $167,439 $323,742 $393,511 $237,060


Item ID

District catchment








Banksia Beach Local Recreation

Local Recreation


2012 2019 $167,439 $323,742 $393,510 $237,060


Kallangur Local Recreation

Local Recreation


2012 2019 $167,439 $201,998 $245,530 $237,060

OS-142 Rural Woodford Local Recreation

Local Recreation


2012 2019 $167,439 $50,265 $61,098 $237,060


Bongaree Local Recreation

Local Recreation


2012 2019 $167,439 $323,740 $393,508 $237,060


Reserve (Anzac Avenue) - Kallangur Local Recreation

Local Recreation


2012 2019 $167,439 $613,050 $745,166 $237,060

OS-74 Strathpine Brendale Local Recreation

Local Recreation

New Land 2012 2019 $0 $1,757,143

$2,135,819 $0


Pearson Park

Local Recreation

Upgrade 2012 2019 $204,917 $0 $0 $290,122


Haithi Park Local Recreation

Upgrade 2012 2019 $164,730 $0 $0 $233,225


Item ID

District catchment







OS-82 Strathpine Normanby Way

Local Recreation

Upgrade 2012 2019 $109,630 $0 $0 $155,214

OS-93 Strathpine Nicol Way Park

Local Recreation

Upgrade 2012 2019 $287,404 $0 $0 $406,907


Bestmann Road East Park

Local Recreation

Upgrade 2012 2019 $155,490 $0 $0 $220,143

OS-123 Caboolture Pumicestone Road Park

Local Recreation

Upgrade 2012 2019 $35,319 $0 $0 $50,004

OS-124 Caboolture Elof Road Park (East)

Local Recreation

Upgrade 2012 2019 $172,899 $0 $0 $244,790

OS-125 Caboolture Schofield Circuit Park

Local Recreation

Upgrade 2012 2019 $203,767 $0 $0 $288,494

OS-130 Caboolture Crowe Road Park

Local Recreation

Upgrade 2012 2019 $181,250 $0 $0 $256,614

OS-131 Caboolture Manning Court Park

Local Recreation

Upgrade 2012 2019 $65,000 $0 $0 $92,027

OS-144 Strathpine John Leitch Memorial Park

Local Recreation

Upgrade 2012 2019 $189,654 $0 $0 $268,512


Greenshank Crescent Park

Local Recreation

Upgrade 2012 2019 $168,767 $0 $0 $238,941


Godwin Beach Esplanade

Local Foreshore

Upgrade 2012 2019 $500,000 $0 $0 $707,901


Item ID

District catchment








Pioneer Park (Boat Ramp) (North)

Local Foreshore

Upgrade 2012 2019 $323,506 $0 $0 $458,020


Antigua Crescent Park

Local Foreshore

Upgrade 2012 2019 $500,000 $0 $0 $707,901

OS-54 Strathpine Rob Akers Reserve

District Sport

Upgrade 2012 2019 $1,100,000 $0 $0 $1,557,382

OS-40 Strathpine Nolan Park Regional Sport

Upgrade 2012 2019 $3,861,541 $0 $0 $5,467,176

OS-39 Caboolture Moreton Bay Central Sports Complex - Phase 1

Regional Sport

Upgrade 2014 2021 $26,500,000 $0 $0 $36,059,283

OS-28 Rural Woodford District Sport

District Sport


2012 2021 $6,560,618 $68,619 $83,406 $9,288,533

OS-04 Caboolture Caboolture Sports Centre

District Sport

Upgrade 2014 2021 $1,160,000 $0 $0 $1,578,444

OS-18 Caboolture Petersen Road Sportsgrounds

District Sport

Upgrade 2014 2021 $770,000 $0 $0 $1,047,760

OS-19 Strathpine James Drysdale Reserve

District Sport

Upgrade 2014 2021 $4,100,000 $0 $0 $5,578,983


Item ID

District catchment







OS-41 Rural Samford Parklands

District Sport

Upgrade 2014 2021 $4,400,000 $0 $0 $5,987,202


Redcliffe Showgrounds

District Sport

Upgrade 2014 2021 $850,000 $0 $0 $1,156,619


Narangba Sport and Recreation Complex

District Sport

Upgrade 2014 2021 $2,205,000 $0 $0 $3,000,404



District Sport

Investigation 2014 2021 $12,000,000 $0 $0 $16,328,732


Zammit Street Sportsgrounds

District Sport

Upgrade 2014 2021 $755,000 $0 $0 $1,027,349


Beachmere Sportsgrounds

District Sport

Upgrade 2014 2021 $2,670,000 $0 $0 $3,633,143

OS-38 Rural Kurwongbah Sport

Regional Sport

Investigation 2012 2021 $0 $2,500,000

$3,038,766 $0

OS-39 Caboolture Moreton Bay Central Sports Complex - Phase 2

Regional Sport

Upgrade 2014 2026 $4,000,000 $0 $0 $5,822,649


Item ID

District catchment








Regional Sport

Upgrade 2014 2026 $8,000,000 $0 $0 $11,645,297

OS-22 Caboolture Caboolture South District Recreation

District Recreation


2012 2026 $1,365,390 $655,604 $796,891 $2,067,990


North Lakes District Sport

District Sport


2012 2026 $1,900,000 $26,285,714

$31,950,450 $2,877,699



District Sport

Investigation 2014 2026 $12,000,000 $0 $0 $17,467,946


Mango Hill Local Recreation

Local Recreation


2012 2026 $167,439 $662,191 $804,897 $253,599



Local Recreation


2012 2026 $167,439 $511,397 $621,606 $253,599



Local Recreation


2012 2026 $167,439 $511,396 $621,605 $253,599



Local Recreation


2012 2026 $167,439 $662,193 $804,900 $253,599


Item ID

District catchment









Local Recreation


2012 2026 $167,439 $662,192 $804,899 $253,599


Ningi Local Recreation

Local Recreation


2012 2026 $167,439 $323,741 $393,509 $253,599


Deception Bay Local Recreation

Local Recreation


2012 2026 $167,439 $144,974 $176,217 $253,599

OS-119 Strathpine Everton Hills Local Recreation

Local Recreation


2012 2026 $167,439 $511,396 $621,605 $253,599

OS-134 Caboolture Caboolture Local Recreation

Local Recreation


2012 2026 $167,439 $465,503 $565,821 $253,599


Local Recreation


2012 2026 $167,439 $465,501 $565,820 $253,599


Local Recreation


2012 2026 $167,439 $465,502 $565,821 $253,599


Local Recreation


2012 2026 $167,439 $465,501 $565,819 $253,599


Deception Bay Local Recreation

Local Recreation


2012 2026 $167,439 $113,321 $137,742 $253,599


Item ID

District catchment








Donnybrook Local Recreation

Local Recreation

New Land 2012 2026 $0 $3,153 $3,832 $0


Local Recreation

New Land 2012 2026 $0 $194,658 $236,607 $0

OS-151 Strathpine Everton Hills Local Recreation

Local Recreation

New Land 2012 2026 $0 $700,294 $851,211 $0


Ray Frawley Fields

District Sport

Upgrade 2014 2026 $165,000 $0 $0 $240,184

OS-56 Strathpine Strathpine Regional Recreation

Regional Recreation


2012 2031 $1,135,530 $373,460 $453,943 $1,794,625

OS-37 Strathpine Pine Rivers Park

Regional Recreation

Upgrade 2012 2031 $1,089,512 $0 $0 $1,721,897

OS-59 Caboolture 94 Lower King Street, Caboolture

Regional Recreation

Upgrade 2012 2031 $1,062,800 $0 $0 $1,679,681


Woorim Foreshore

Regional Foreshore

Upgrade 2012 2031 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $1,580,430


Redcliffe Civic Regional

Regional Civic


2012 2031 $2,862,719 $2,402,233

$2,919,929 $4,524,326


Item ID

District catchment








Regional Sport

Upgrade 2014 2031 $8,930,000 $0 $0 $13,564,240


Murrumba Downs District Recreation

District Recreation

New Land 2012 2031 $0 $322,178 $391,609 $0


Barry Bolton Park

District Recreation

Upgrade 2012 2031 $966,232 $0 $0 $1,527,062


Kroll Gardens

District Recreation

Upgrade 2012 2031 $1,071,932 $0 $0 $1,694,113


Deception Bay Community Centre

District Recreation

Upgrade 2012 2031 $629,056 $0 $0 $994,179


Blatchford Sporting & Recreation Reserve

District Recreation

Upgrade 2012 2031 $865,412 $0 $0 $1,367,723

OS-03 Caboolture Wamuran District Sport

District Sport


2012 2031 $4,000,000 $2,836,755

$3,448,093 $6,321,718

OS-27 Rural Dayboro District Sport

District Sport


2014 2031 $400,000 $3,416,000

$3,766,140 $607,581


Item ID

District catchment









District Sport

Investigation 2014 2031 $8,000,000 $0 $0 $12,151,614

OS-139 Rural Dayboro Local Recreation

Local Recreation


2012 2031 $167,439 $6,812 $8,280 $264,626


Lahore Park Local Recreation

Upgrade 2012 2031 $183,580 $0 $0 $290,135

OS-72 Strathpine Skate Park Local Recreation

Upgrade 2012 2031 $45,480 $0 $0 $71,878


Deception Bay Local Foreshore

Local Foreshore

Upgrade 2012 2031 $565,878 $0 $0 $894,330

OS-02 Rural Alan Cash Park

District Sport

Upgrade 2012 2031 $400,000 $0 $0 $632,172

Total $92,372,891 $310,318,339

* Baseline excludes any project owner costs or contingency # Statutory guideline 03/14 - Local government infrastructure plans


9.0 Source and supporting documents

Source RIO Reference

Open Space Strategy 2012-2031, MBRC (2015)

Appendix A - Park Classification System

Appendix B - Program Action Plan

A12651989

A12651991

A12651990

Urban Recreation Park Plan 2012-2031, MBRC (2015)

Appendix A - Facility Audit

Appendix B - Desired Standards of Service

Appendix C - Catchment Profiles

Appendix D - Program Action Plan

Appendix E - Future Infrastructure Requirements

A12653687

A12653787

A12653840

A12668660

A12658355

A12658472

Urban Recreation Park Analysis, MBRC (2015) A10360479

Urban Recreation Cost Estimates, MBRC (2013)

Urban Recreation Unit Rates

Urban Recreation Cost Estimates – District and Regional Recreation

Urban Recreation Cost Estimates – Local Recreation

Urban Recreation Cost Estimates – Foreshore

Urban Recreation Cost Estimates – Civic

A10360474

A10360471

A10360473

A10360472

A10360470

Interim Sports Facilities Plan 2012-2031, MBRC (2015)

Appendix A - Desired Standards of Service

Appendix B - Catchment Profiles

Appendix C - Future Infrastructure Requirements

A11938645

A11938648

A11938646

A11938647

Sports Park Analysis, MBRC (2015) A11911497

Sports Park Cost Estimates, MBRC (2015)

Sports Park Unit Rates

Sports Park Cost Estimates

A11913381

A11913400

Open Space Land Values, MBRC (2013) A12172626

Valuation Report – Indicative Land Values for the Proposed Moreton Bay Regional

Planning Scheme 2013, Opteon (2013)

A12172633

Valuation Report – Priority Infrastructure Plan Schedule of Valuations for

Caboolture District Moreton Bay Regional Council, Opteon (2012)

A12172630

Valuation Report – Priority Infrastructure Plan Schedule of Valuations for Pine

Rivers District Moreton Bay Regional Council, Opteon (2012)

A12172631

Valuation Report – Priority Infrastructure Plan Schedule of Valuations for Redcliffe

District Moreton Bay Regional Council, Opteon (2012)

A12172632

Landscape Queensland “Costing Guide” 6th edition, Landscape Queensland (2009) -

Rawlinsons Construction Cost Guide 2012, Rawlinsons (2012) -

Documents

Open Space Extrinsic Material - Moreton Bay Region...Open Space Extrinsic Material - 2017 3 1.0 Preliminary The Moreton Bay Region has a diverse and complementary network of open space