OP89 - 179 TRUMAN TWP. PROPERTY Sudbury Mining Division ... · by Gordon, Edwin and Lucy Salo. - Detail total field Magnetometer survey by Gordon and Ed Salo - Detail picket line

f41ie6SW80M 63.5567 DIEPPE 010

OP89 - 179

TRUMAN TWP. PROPERTY

Sudbury Mining Division

Report on Prospecting activities

By Gordon Salo

TABLE OF63.5567 DIEPPE

~.— *~-0I0C

INTRODUCTION

LOCATION MAP

CLAIM MAP

DESCRIPTION OF WORK PERFORMED

HISTORY AND DEVELOPMENT

RESULTS OF WORK COMPLETED

CONCLUSIONS 4 RECOMMENDATIONS

SAMPLE DESCRIPTIONS

ASSAY RESULTS

PAGE

1

2

3

4

5,6

7,8

9

10

11 -16

(1)INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this report is to provide a general description

and summary of the results of field work performed by myself from

Aug. 09, 1989 to Dec. 09,1989.

The property held by myself in Truman Township consists of a

claim block of 6 claims in good standing (943594- 98, 984043).

The claims are located in the Central- Eastern section of the Town ship, immediately abutting two leased claims held by Mr. Carmen

Fielding Sr. of Penage Quartz Ltd. The property can be accessed

from the Northshore of Lake Penage via boat or snowmobile and walking

trail on the Southshore or by special arrangement with Mr. Fielding,

for use of the Penage Quartz Ltd's barge, docking facilities andsQuarry rd. to gain access for heavy equipment to the claim group.

My summer camp which is located on the Northshore of Lake Penage,

Northeast of the property can be accessed via Hwy. 17 west to

Regional rd. # 10 (formerly Hwy 549) to the Northshore rd. The only

facilities to note on the claims are a number of exploration pits,

the decayed remnants of an old log cabin, the present picket line

grid system and the trenching work recently completed.

'l j***"*-^\ T"' ) 'Vi -- ^~-A \ \ K. 'H ,- SK\ IV .x' Ilk """-1 ,-'*Wwff..m M l\ . ,. . ^^-.Jtff,-r^' \ K V' V'"' ~s\/ O L / nliM,,-^ \ S ^S^KX^r^l(t*^c.*-l \X

^ 5 ^ X l 'i * y ) /rv/V" V?^L"1""1'\ îf^^n CÔP^ y/7 'Y-- X^ X ' ''lt^M"' -^j^R^^ ^1^^"- \ " w o ^ s : f! x/Vy/fl ^ 'Vjr'W'*m*v?Miat-. j?^

Wvn yC " ^ ,. s- ;- (^,, V://'7 ! " ^^^^H^^"'-' ' ~

HAP

r---*-i^rv "^r-i^rT ; , . l "' 0)"^.^.

^WH /-;i\A *7XkiAL^. ,' ,v '

J^s./ ^..V3ie9\ (f D .. /" .,vî l V

Panache

• •4t*S l *I4TJ1 l 1*(HO' ,j

l \i *"il *)4^Tl"' ' 'T'. "' 'i')

- -1- \ ,'~tt4 '

(4)

DESCRIPTION OF WORK PERFORMEDt

Stripping of overburden ranging in thickness of up to two meterswas accomplished manually by pick, shovel and bulldozer over numerous

areas of interest, (see map).

A portable gas powered high pressure water pump and pressure nozzle

was used to wash bedrock surfaces and a Pionjar rock drill and

explosives were used for rock trenching. New prospect pits were

sunk on magnetic and VLF anomallies located at 570E-690N and 335E-600N.

One chip and 20 grab samples have been collected and the assay results are shown later in this report.

iVLF and Total field Magnetic surveys were completed over two frozen

swamp areas that were not surveyed in previous surveys.

(5)


GORDON SALO

1989- Manual stripping, rock trenching and sampling.

- Total Field magnetometer and VLF Surveys completed over swamps.

- Bulldozer stripping and pressure washing funded byFalconbridge Ltd.

1988- Ground Horizontal Loop Electromagnetic Survey- Ground Gradiometer Magnetic and VLF-EM Surveys.

- Property examination and report by Kerr Addison Mines Ltd.

- Grab sampling and assaying by Inco Gold.

- Seven (7) grab samples collected by myself from Pit # 10.- Property exam Ministry of Northern Development and Mines.

- Manual stripping, bedrock washing and rock trenching performed

by Gordon, Edwin and Lucy Salo.

- Detail total field Magnetometer survey by Gordon and Ed Salo- Detail picket line Grid cutting from line 224 East, Station

300 North to line 488 East, Station 700 North.

B.P. SELCO LIMITED

1987- Helicopter Magnetic VLF-EM surveys by Aerodat Ltd.

GORDON SALO

1987- Ground Total Field Magnetic and VLF-EM Surveys by N. Richardson

and J. Watkins.

- A picket line grid having line spacing of 61 meters and station spacing of 25 meters has been completed.

- Preliminary manual stripping and trenching

- B.P. Selco Ltd.- Property examination.

- Falconbridge Ltd.- Property examination.

- Inco Ltd.- Property Examination.

- Ministry of Northern Development and Mines- Property examination

- The property covering the main showing was staked in October

of 1986 by Gordon Salo

(6)

:ARMEN FIELDING SR.

1984- The property was staked in August of 1984 by Mr. Carmen

Fielding.

- Property examination was completed by Lac Minerals.

1983- Lac Minerals Helicopter Magnetic and Electromagnetic Surveys

by Aerodat Ltd.

ONTARIO GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

1977- Truman Township preliminary Geology Map P-1497 completed.

CARMEN FIELDING SR.

1972- Mr. C. Fielding restaked claims # S146509 and S147452 over

lapsed claims. Subsequent assessment work recorded brought

these two claims to lease. The claims presently border the

Salo property to the Northeast.

1964- Mr. C. Fielding staked eight claims covering the present

Salo property.

GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF CANADA

1960- An airborne magnetic survey map of the Lake Penage region

was completed.

OSCAR TAPPER,L. HOTTI S F. CHRISTENSEN

1954- A total of 121 days of assessment work was recorded on claims

numbered 63527,63594,63623 which cover the present Salo showing.

The claims lapsed Dec.08/55.

1953- A total of 175 days of assessment work was recorded on claims

numbered 63526,63527,63594,63623 which cover the Salo showing.

1952- Claims numbered 63526,63527,63594,63623 which cover the

present Salo showing were staked and recorded.

(7)

RESULTS OF WORK COMPLETED

UNDER PROSPECTING PROJECT

OP89 - 179

(Map 1)

570E-690N Manual stripping was completed on a large outcrop of

milk white quartz approximately one meter wide and ten meters long, striking N.E. The quartz vein contained some brick red material which

looked like Hemitite. A rock trench was then sunk into the vein

to a depth of one meter with the use of a gasoline powered Pionjardrill and explosives. No sulphide mineralization of interest was

encountered and it was decided to move on to the next work site.

355E-600N Manual stripping was completed over an area of 2 meters

square, exposing an outcrop of Nipissing Gabbro. A pit was then

drilledand blasted into the Gabbro to a depth of 2 meters. Sulphide

mineralization encountered consisted of very fine grained pyrrhotite

in trace amounts within the Nipissing Gabbro.

274E-500N Preliminary manual stripping was completed over a magnetic

anomally at this site. A Breccia area was uncovered with a quartz

carbonate matrix. Breccia fragments were composed of Sedimentary

wall rocks of the area. Massive sulphide in stringers and small pods up to 30cm across seem to be common in Matrix areas composed

mainly of calcite. Brick red colored soil was a positive indicator

of sulphide mineralization lying below.

250E-510N Preliminary manual stripping was attempted on this magnetic

anomally but overburden removal proved to be very time consuming and

the site was abandoned. Subsequent bulldozer stripping revealed

massive sulphide stringers and pods within a calcite rich breccia

zone similar to the site stripped at 274E-500N

100E-400N Preliminary manual stripping was accomplished on this

site over an area approximately l meter by 3 meters to a depth

of ^ a meter. The revealed outcrop appeared to be a Nipissing

Gabbro dike with some very fine grained pyrrhotite disseminated

throughout it.

(8)

V.L.F. SURVEY (MAP 2)

A Geonics EM16 instrument was used to take readings over the two

swamp areas previously described. The transmitting station used was

Cutler, Maine at 24KHz. All data has been plotted and is shown on map number 2. VLF cross overs are shown running thru the central

areas of both swamps. Anomally "D" running from L61E-740N to

L244E-655N seems to correspond with the very weak magnetics

plotted in the same location. Anomally "E" runs from L549E-460N to

L915E-385N and it also crosses a very weak magnetic anomally at

L671E-500N.

V.L.F. FRAZER FILTER PLOT (MAP 3)

A four point Frazer Filter was passed over the Data converting all

cross-over anomallies to high positive anomallies.,,This procedure

shortens the data set at either end and the filtered data is plotted

at the center of the four data points used. Data for the entire grid

including the two swamps was plotted on a new map # 3. The

completed map shows a most interesting cross or X shaped anomally

stretching right across the length St width of the grid. The plot

shows 4 main limbs which intersect in the central points of the grid

directly over the massive sulphide showings uncovered by stripping.

The most interesting areas are located at L61E-260N and L671E-500N.

TOTAL FIELD MAGNETOMETER SURVEY OVER SWAMPS. (MAP 4)

A Scintrex Mp-2 proton precision type total field Magnetometer with

a sensitivity of .1 gamma was used to take readings over two frozen

swamp areas located in the N.W. corner and the central eastern section of the claim block. The data has been corrected for diurnal

drift using the tie line method and a reference datum subtracted. Survey data has been plotted and contoured, see map (4).

No high magnetic anomallies were encountered over the course of

the survey. Only very sightly higher magnetic readings were encoun

tered in the central sections of the two swamp areas. L671-500N corresponds with a very strong VLF Frazer Filtered response.

(9)

CONCLUSIONS S RECOMMENDATIONS

The massive sulphide showings uncovered from this year's stripping

and trenching now have an extended strike length of 400'.

The Copper, Nickel, Cobalt mineralization may also extend further

out into the swamp areas as 4 limbs of the V.L.F. anomallies

would seem to indicate. I would recommend that the following work

be pursued,

1. A backhoe or excavator be brought in to strip the thicker layer of overburden around pit 10 which the bulldozer was unable to

remove this year.

2. Extensive bedrock washing should be completed on areas that

may be stripped with a backhoe.

3. Detailed geological mapping of stripped and washed areas.

4. Collect some samples from bottom of swamp areas that gave strong

V.L.F. responses and assay for trace elements.

OftO 1\ .

(10)

TRUMAN TOWNSHIP

SAMPLE DESCRIPTIONS l Sulphide

SAMPLE #

1.

2.

3.4.5.

6.

7.

8.16.17.18.

19.

20.

21.

22.

23.

Jmarcasite

Small sulphide pod orstringer. 201 calcite, QW.Dark color fine grain brecciafragment within calcite zonecriss-crossed with Py S Cpyfracture fillingsSmall sulphide pod or stringerSmokey black Q.V. materialWeathered sulphide pod orstringerWeathered sulphide stringervein in quartz calcite brecciazoneSmall Q.V. stringer cuts seds.Soda altered?15 ' chip sampleSome calcite in sampleMassive sulphideMassive silver whitesulphideMassive sulphidePeacock colors, blue,green, red, orangeDark green chloritebreccia2Q% calcite matrix* sulphide nodulesCalcite * lots of peacockcolor in sulphideQ.V. 151

100

40

Po

50-60

'

10-20-

60-70

40-50

-757585

-

99

-

-

-5

Py

10-20

2- 340-501- 2

10

10

2-32020^15

-

-

<l

80

2040

Cpy

1

1*I-

1-2

^1

15-

^1

-

*C1

-

-

-

Magnetite

-

---

-

-

----

-

-

-

-

-

Bondar-Clcgg Si Company Ud 5420 Canotek Road Ottawa,!KU9G2J613) 749-^0 Telex 053-3233

(ID

Geochemical Lab Report

BONDAR-CLEGG

REPORTS 089-54023.0 ( COHPLETE )

CLIENT: GORDON SALO PROJECT: NONE

REFERENCE INFO:

SUBMITTED BY: GORDON SALO DATE PRINTED: 22-DEC-89

NUKBEROF . LOWER ORDER ELEHENT ANALYSES DETECTION LIMIT

1 Li Lithiui 23 1 PPH 2 Be Beryl! lui 23 0.5 PPH

EXTRACTION

HCL-HN03, (3:1) HCL-HN03, (3:1)

HETHOD

Ind. Coupled Plasia Ind, Coupled Plasia

3 Se ScandiuB 4 V Vanadium 5 Cr Chroniun 6 Co Cobalt 7 Ni Nickel

23 1 PPH 23 1 PPH 23 1 PPH 23 1 PPH 23 1 PPH

HCL-HN03, (3:1) HCL-HN03, (3:1) HCL-HN03, (3:1) HCL-HN03, (3:1) HCL-HN03, (3:1)

Ind. Coupled Plasea Ind. Coupled Plasia Ind. Coupled PlasBa Ind. Coupled Plasia Ind. Coupled Plasia

8 Cu Copper 9 In Z inc

10 Ga Galliui 11 As Arsenic 12 Rb Rubidiun



Ind. Coupled Plasia Ind. Coupled Plasia Ind. Coupled Plasia Ind. Coupled Plasia Ind. Coupled Plasia

^^^

^V 13 Sr Strontiun 14 Y Yttriui 15 Zr Zirconiui 16 Nb Niobiui 17 Ho Holybdenun



Ind. Coupled Plasiia Ind. Coupled Plasia Ind. Coupled Plasia Ind. Coupled Plasia Ind. Coupled Plasia

18 Ag Silver 19 Cd CadniuR 20 Sn Tin 21 Sb Antiiony 22 Te Telluriua

23 0,2 PPH 23 1 PPH 23 20 PPH 23 5 PPH 23 10 PPH



23 8a Barium 24 La LanthanuB 25 Ce Cerium 26 Ta Tantalum 27 W Tungsten


HCL-HN03, (3:1) HCL-HN03, (3:1) HCL-HN03, (3:1) HCL-HN03, (3)1) HCL-HN03, (3:1)


28 Pb Lead 29 Bi BisButh 30 Cr ChroBiuB 31 Pd Palladiua 32 Pd ReM Palladium Reweighs

:,

23 2 PPH 23 2 PPH 23 2 PPH 23 1 PP6

1 1PPB

HCL-HN03, (3:1) HCL-HN03, (3:1)

AQUA REGIA

Ind. Coupled Plasia Ind. Coupled Plasia X-Ray Fluorescence FireAssay/DC Plasia

33 Pd Rew Palladia ReMeighs • 34 Pt PI at i nun

35 Pt Rew PlatinuB Reweighs ^ 36 Pt Rew PlatinuR Reweighs "* 37 Au Gold

1 1 PP8 23 5 PP8

1 5PPB 1 5PP8

23 1 PPB

AQUA REGIA

AQUA REGIA

FireAssay/DC Plasia

FireAssay/DC Plasia

Bondar-Oegg Si Company Ltd5420 Canotek Road Ottawa, KIJ 902

tt) 749-2220 Telex 053-3233

(12)


BONDAR-CLEGG

j REPORT: 089-54023,0 ( COMPLETE )

! . CLIENT: GORDON SALO l PROJECT: NONES,

REFERENCE INFO:

SUBMITTED BY: GORDON SALO DATE PRINTED: 22-DEC-89

NUMBER OF LOWER : ORDER ELEMENT ANALYSES DETECTION LIMIT EXTRACTION METHOD

38 Au Rew Au Reneighs 1 1 PP6 39 Au Rew Au Reweighs 1 1 PP8

SAMPLE TYPES NUMBER SIZE FRACTIONS

ROCK 23 -200

NUMBER SAMPLE PREPARATIONS

23 Crush.Pulverlze -200

NUMBER

23

REMARKS: THE SAMPLES HAVE VERY HIGH LEVELS OF FE, CA AND MG,

REPORT COPIES TO: 806 CONNAUGHT AVE, INVOICE TO: 806 CONNAUGHT AVE,

Bondar-Clcgg ft Company l id. 5420 Canotek Road Ottawa, ( KIJ9G2

3)749-2210 Telex 053-3233

(13)

BONDAR-CLEGG


DATE PRINTED! 22-DEC-89REPORT: 089-54023,0

. SAMPLE ELEMENT Li NUMBER UNITS PPM

Be PPM

Se PPM

V PPM

Cr PPM

PROJECT: NONE PAGE 1A

Co PPM

Ni PPM

Cu PPM

Zn PPM

Ga PPM

As PPM

02| j/ 4 03 L/ -X 2 04 /\j^ ci 05 1 ci

97.6 7,4

65,6 5,8

103,5

4 9

32 15

12 57 27 4

15

55 165 113 355 22

362 13 322 85 675

2315 57

1061 19

1516

349 98 979 126

1885

5

4 20

9 C2 C2

c5 c5 20 2330

06 1o? y ciW ci 09-\ 410 r *^ 6

89,1 28.6

107.7 51.1 76.1

94 3 1 2

20 10 12 10 14

38 301 45

141 143

328 367

1375 1013 2078

1365 326

4191 3137 6345

974 618

7361 2437 1322

4 4

508 6

C2 C2

20 17 38

1261 3062

l \ \ t 1/ttn L wr* 212 1 13 ci 14 2 15/ 5

45,8 10,9 11.8 14.7 13,7

2 3

2 7

8 16 4

10 72

156 260 258 215 320

2635 217 182 453 45

2566 73 59

757 156

)20000 ^0000

1679 16703

604

ci 1

10

4

3 9

4329 282 133 838

5^*~~3^BE~~"

17 0X ci18 \ S iX 4 19 VV^ 420 J ' 25

27.9 141.1 112.2 133.6 12.7

55 3 2 3

12

42 15 13 16 26

102 22

169 7

95

624 528

4816 395 10

637 4661 1318 5331

82

3668 858

18907 3880 134

ci ci 7

10 c2 c2 c2 C2

10 17

153 7

C5|

21 l ci 22 j 1 23/ ci

t

96.5 35.3 110,9

2 44 2

17 28 14

126 114 165

529 557

4168

6015 144

1051

6401 ^0000

8354 3C2 C2

21 48 74

i

j:

(14)

Bondar-Qegg ft Company Ltd 5420 Canotek Road Ottawa, KIJ 9G2

13) 749-2220 Telex 053-3233 BONDAR-CLEGG


DATE PRINTED: 22-DEC-89REPORT! 089-54023,0

. SAMPLE ELEMENT Rb SrNUMBER UNITS PPM PPM

or\ 40 202) . 79 403 y t/r 25 1304Lxf n;ty^ <20 2

i 05 [ '^ 25 1l

1 06 21 40?) 40 408/ 32 109") 40 210 ^ . ^ 65 3

\ IMJL^rl

11 (^ 1 <20 212 35 313 40 1

; 14 <20 4iy 60 6

^^^^.—

W 16^ 42 3617 49 2

:. 18 y ^ ™ 319 X ,M^ * 20 2

l 20 j A^ <20 13

21 \ 40 2222 ) 87 2923 y 49 2 X

ir

; r.

1 ~*

Y Zr NbPPM PPK PPH P

3 4 46 47 2

14 3 44 1 4

5 4 4

7 9 44 6 4344'3 15 43 11 4

2 10 42 6 3

4 24*4 29 24 28 2 *

24 1 4 <3 4 4 *3 <l <l < 344*9 22 1

3 5 <l <24 14*244*

PROJECT! NONE

lo Ag Cd'H PPH PPH

ci 4,2 21 4,2 4

ci 4,2 1ci 4,2 4ci 4,2 4

4 4,2 34 4,2 44 4,2 8:l 4,2 24 4,2 5

4 10,9 82 5,7 44 0,4 41 4,4 14 4,2 4

1 4,2 21 4,2 21 0,5 3 1 4,2 22 4,2 4

1 4,2 21 4,2 41 4,2 4

SnPPH

4040404040

4040404040

4040404040

404040 4040

404040

PAGE 18

SbPPH

^3^^^

^^^^^

^^^^^

^^

^^

^^(5

TePPH

4040404040

4040404040

4040404040

404040 4040

404040

Bottdar-Clegg Si Company Ud5420 Canotek RoadOttawa, (KIJ!f613) 74^520 Telex 053-3233

(15)

BONDAR-CLEGG


REPORT: 089-54023.0

SAMPLE ELEMENT Ba La Ce Ta ' NUMBER UNITS PPM PPM PPM PPM

DATE PRINTED:PROJECT: NONE

22-DEC-89PAGE 1C

H Pb Bi PPM PPM PPM

Cr PPM

Pd PPB

Pd Rew Pd Ren PPB PPB

01 *\ 4 13 S 40 02 ; 31 19 38 40 03 ( 5 16 18 40 04 f/fjjiltffl 5 4 ^ 40 05 IA^ 6 15 <5 40

40 4 22 40 2 4 40 ^ 11 40 ^ ^ <10 ^ 17

37 270

58 732 32

28 4

7 4 18

•" 06 4 12 8 40 l 07 4 6 13 40

08V 4 15 S 40 09") 4 4 ^ 40 10 y 4 12 8 40

<10 <2 11 40 ^ 4 <10 35 29 40 ^ 7 <10 ^ 15

36 514

34 201 97

21 2

72 8

14f

11 l A Ijrf^ 3 3 7 *10 li 12 T KJ^fl 8 5 14 40h 13 526 40 ir 14 626 40 | KJ 82 7 14 40l' ^^ '"l-

l 17 f 5 14 <5 40 18 /x ,-*iA*^ 2 2 <5 40

I 19 ywtr7 2 14 3 40 20 1 2 21 45 40

<10 <10K1040 40

C2 65 4 13 2 3 4 9

40 52 4 40 ^ 30 40 ^ 39 40 ^ 27 <10 ^ <2

320 602 559 348 554

19 50 15

116

25 4 4 4 4

12 70 14 85 4

4 4

21 2 17 3 40 22 3 1 41 40 23y 2 13 3 40

KlO 121 19 40 20 42 40 ^ 31

22 8

45

83 5

12

(16)l Bondar-Cfcgg Si Company Lid f 5420 Canotek Road" -

KIJ 613) 749-2220 Telex 053-3233


BONDAR-CLEGG

DATE PRINTED t 22-DEC-89REPORT! 089-54023.0

SAHPLENUMBER

ELEMENTUNITS

PtPPB

Pt RewPPB

Pt RewPPB

AuPPB

Au RewPPB

PROJECT! NONE

Au RewPPB

PAGE ID

<5 <5 <5 3<5

61312

656

<5<5

55

137

1282419

<5 <5<5 <5

381780

18966

6

2030 1890

<5 <5 <5

<5 <5

442

31014

IT 369 118

41 I06SW88M 63.5567 D IEPPE 020

COMPILATION ASSESSMENT REPORT: SALO PROPERTY

COPPER, NICKEL, COBALT, GOLD

PALLADIUM AND PLATINUM

PROSPECT

TRUMAN TOWNSHIP

SUDBURY MINING DISTRICT

Compiled byiMr. David G. Farrow B.A. B.Ed.2-2495 Falcon Ave.,Ottawa, OntarioK1V 8C8

4 r i eeswae H ea. sse? o i EPPE 020C

This compilation assessment report was completed on the recommendation and approval of Mr. Gordon Salo. The Salo

property was originally going to be visited in December of 1989. However, an early accumulation of snow made property examination impossible. Because large amount of data has been collected on the property in the last three years, Mr. Salo decided that a

composite report be completed on the assessment and mineral potential of the property thus far.

It should be noted that many people have produced work and collected data for Mr.Salo on his property. Many of their views,

ideas and interpretations are presented in the preceding report and will be noted accordingly. My purpose was to compile that

data into a comprehensive report that summarizes work completed to date on the property.

The recommendations made at the end of the report are based on interpretations I have made as a result of studying the data

collected. I hope these suggestions will prove helpful and stimulate ideas for further exploration plans on the property.

Sincerely

David G. Farrow, B.A. B.Ed.

Tab l a of

PageIntroduction l

Location and Access lProperty History 2

Assessment History of the Salo Property 3

Topography 6

Regional Geology 6

Claim Group Geology 7

Economic Geology 7

Geochemistry 8

Geophysics 10

Pits 1 1 a nd 10 11

Salo Ore Reserve Model 12Recommendations 12Bibliography 13

Introduction

The economic mineral potential of Truman Towmship in the Sudbury mining district has been known for close to forty years. Fourteen claims staked by Mr. Gordon Salo on the south side of

Lake Panache show considerable potential for mineral development. The history of this property dates back to 1952 when initial

prospecting and claim staking was completed. Since the restaking

of this property by Mr. Salo in October of 1986, a tremendous amount of effort has been put into the assessment and development

of this property.

Several reports and evalutions have been completed over the years on this property. However, no composite report with suggestions on further exploration directions has been compiled.

This assessment compilation report will bring together all geological, geophysical and geochemical information and suggest further stategies that should be undertaken on the Salo property.

Location and Aecegs

The Salo property is located on the south side of Lake

Panache in the east - central section of Truman Township. The claim group consists of 14 claims numbered 943594 - 943598,

984043 and 1042795 - 1042802. This claim group is joined to two claim groups leased by Penage Quartz Ltd.

Access to the property is via Highway 17 west of Sudbury to Regional Road 10 (formerly Highway 549). The north shore of Lake

Panache is south on Regional Road 10. Here one can launch a boat from Panache Marina or travel 12 kilometres along the north shore

road until reaching Mr. Sale's camp. From Mr. Salo's camp the claim group is easily accessed via boat, snowmobile or walking

trail on the south shore of the lake. Heavy equipment can access the property by making special arrangements to use a barge

docking facility owned by Panache Quartz Ltd.

Property History

The history of the Truman Township property dates back to 1952. Three prospectors, Tapper, Hotti and Christensen, staked and recorded claims numbered 63526, 63527, 63594 and 63623 that

covered the present Salo showing. In 1953, Tapper et al. performed a total of 175 days of assessment work on the four

claims and recorded it with the Ontario Government. The following year, Tapper et al. recorded a total of 121 days of

assessment work on the claims. On December 8, 1955, the claims lapsed and the ground went open.

In 1960, the Geological Survey of Canada sponsored an Airborne Magnetometer Survey of the Lake Panache region. The

resultant map was published. This map was not consulted during the preparation of this report.

In 1964, the present Salo showing was staked by Mr. Carmen

Fielding Sr. A total of 8 claims covering the present dimensions of the Salo property were staked. No assessment work was recorded on these claims and the property lapsed back to open

ground.

In 1972, Carmen Fielding Sr., restaked claims numbered

S146509 and S147452 over those previously staked in 1964, These

claims border the Salo property to the northeast. They are

presently being worked by Panache Lake Quartz Ltd.In 1977, the Ontario Geological Survey produced a

preliminary geological map that included Truman Township. The

map presented an overview of the regional geology of the area. This map also noted Panache Lake Quartz Ltd. as a producer of

silicon (Si) and quartzite.

LAC minerals was the first major exploration company to show

interest in the Truman Township property. In 1983, LAC sponsored a helicopter magnetometer and EM survey. The survey

was carried out by Aerodat Ltd. and displayed a number of bedrock

EM conductors. These conductors correlate exactly with a

mineralized pit on the property.LAC also completed a preliminary property examination in

1983. The resultant map shoved the location of a number of old pits containing pyrite and pyrrhotite in addition to quartz

ve ining.Due to the renewed interest in the area, Carmen Fielding

Sr ., restaked the present Salo showing in August of 1984. No

assessment work was reported and the property lapsed to open

ground the following year.

Assessment History of the Salo Property

(1986)During October 24th, 25th, 29th and 30th, 1986, Mr. Salo

staked his first five claims in Truman Towmnship. The claims on

the south side of Lake Panache were numbered 943594, 943595, 943596, 943597 and 943598 and covered the main showing area. Through Mr. Sale's hard work, dedication and optimism, a

tremendous amount of assessment work has been completed since

initial staking. The results have proven that this area has

definite economic potential.In the fall of 1986, the Ministry of Northern Mines and

Development visited the property to perform a property evaluation. Several grab samples were taken and analyzed. The results will be summarized in the geochemistry section of this report.

(1987)

In the spring of 1987, Mr. Salo staked a total of 29 claims. On April 17th, 1987, claim number 983780 was staked. From May 1st through May 20th, 1987, another 28 claims were staked including 983781 - 983789, 984039 - 984048, and 984738 - 984746.

This brought the total number of claims on the Salo property to 34. (Fig #1)

During that summer, Mr. Salo initiated a number of visits to his property by major exploration companies in the hope that one

of them would be interested in providing funds or in optioning the property. With the backing of a major company, the property

would be easier to develop to its full potential.Inco Ltd. conducted a property examination on April 30th and

May 13th 7 1987. A total of 26 rock samples were collected for geochemistry.

Falconbridge Ltd. conducted a property examination in the summer of 1987. Sixteen rock samples were assayed and analyzed for major oxides and trace elements. Brief field descriptions were completed for each sample.

Information on the Salo property was also sent to Cline

Development Corporation during the summer.

None of the major exploration companies that did preliminary

examinations of the property in 1987 optioned it. However, they

suggested that the property had good economic mineral potential

and that it deserved further study. The results of the

geochemical assays from these property examinations will be dealt with in the geochemistry section of this report.

During 1987, Mr. Salo completed preliminary manual

stripping of specific areas that had shown good mineral potential

from prospecting. A picket line grid system totalling 13 km was

cut over the property. It included 16 lines running north -

south at 61 m intervals. Stations on the lines were 25 m apart

and the lines averaged 800 to 1000 m in length.

Two geophysical surveys were completed over the Salo property in 1987. First, B.P. Selco Ltd. sponsored a helicopter magnetic, VLF-EM survey that encompassed the Salo property. The survey was completed by Aerodat Ltd., and displayed an anomaly that correlated exactly with the main showing on the property. As a result, B.P. Selco Ltd. conducted a property examination and collected seven grab samples for assay from pits #1, #2 and #9.

Subsequently, Mr. Salo commissioned a magnetic and VLF-EM survey to be completed over the newly cut grid system. The survey was completed by Anbil Exploration of Sudbury. The results of the survey will be considered in the geophysics section of this report.

(1988)

Mr. Salo vigorously promoted his property once again in

1988. The Ministry of Northern Development and Mines visited the property again during 1988. Their purpose was to collect rock

samples from the property and send them to a laboratory for mineral identification.

Inco Gold visited the property to sample the exploration

pits. A total of 18 grab and chip samples were collected and

analyzed for major economic metals with a emphasis on Au content.

Another major exploration company, Kerr Addison Mines Ltd., showed interest in the Salo property in 1988 and performed an examination of the area. A short, two page report was produced

that discussed the mineralization and geology of the property.

The results of the above visits will be summarized in the geology section of this report.

Once again, Mr. Salo completed a large amount of work on the property during 1988. A detailed picket line grid was cut over

the main showing area. This new grid started at L 224 E and

ended at L 488 E of the previously cut, grid. The lines run north - south and have spacings of 30.5 m. Along each line the stations are spaced at 12.5 m intervals. Each line has an

average length of 300 to 400 m.At this point, Mr. Salo, along with his father Ed, completed

a total field magnetometer survey over the entire grid. The equipment used was a Scintrex Mp-2, proton precision total field

magnetometer. All magnetic anomalies encountered were flagged during the survey.

Throughout most of 1988, Mr. Salo performed manual stripping and bedrock washing in the main showing area. In addition, a

shallow exploration shaft was sunk into the main massive sulphide vein (Pit #10). Several grab samples were taken from the exploration shaft and analyzed. Further details will be presented in a later section.

More geophysical surveys were conducted over the property in the fall of 1988. The surveys included a ground horizontal loop

electromagnetic survey, a ground gradiometer magnetic survey and

a VLF-EM survey. The survey was conducted by a Cambrian College Geological Engineering Technology student. Approximately two

thirds of the grid was covered in this survey.

(1989)

During 1989, work on the Salo property preceded at a steady pace. Falconbridge Ltd. was the first company to financially sponsor work on the property. Falconbridge funded a trenching program that included bulldozer stripping and pressure washing of

the showing. Manual stripping continued throughout the year.

Twenty grab samples and one chip sample were taken on the property (results are pending). In December, 1989 total field magnetometer and VLF-EM surveys were completed over previously

inaccessable swamps.

Topography

The area consists of rolling hills covered with decidious

and coniferous trees and a somewhat dense underbrush. Fresh water is abundant as a result of many .lakes and rivers throughout the area. The Salo claim group includes two large swamps. These

have just recently been covered by geophysical surveys. A dry cedar swamp covers the central area of the grid and has been successfully surveyed. The claims are approximately 750 feet above sea level with a maximum relief of 100 feet. A large ridge

cuts across the grid and is responsible for much of the relief on the property.

Regional geology

Lithologies from the Huronian Supergroup dominate the Truman Township area. Quartz-feldspar sandstone of the Serpent

Formation and calcareous sandstone and siltstone of the Espanola Formation have been recognized. Both of these formations belong

to the Quirke Lake Group. Mississagi Formation sandstone and argillites of the Hough Lake Group have also been observed.

Nipissing Diabase dykes locally crosscut the area.

Claim Group Gaolooy

It is interpreted that the claim group is comprised mainly of Serpent Formation calcareous sandstone and siltstone. Quartzite with intermixed sub-greywacke and greywacke have been observed. The Panache Lake Fault extends through the property

and connects with the Ringer Lake Fault to the southeast. Sulphide mineralization, including massive pyrrhotite, pyrite and

chalcopyrite is possibly associated with the faults.

A large amount is known about the sulphide mineralization

and the trench geology on the Salo property. However, little work has been completed on the bedrock geology.

Economic Qaology

Massive pyrite/pyrrhotite mineralization are the primary sulphides found on the property. Assays on the sulphide

mineralization to date suggest that it is sub-economic in grade both in base and precious metals. Cu, Ni and Co are found in

highly anomalous concentrations in the sulphides. Gold shows a

moderately high concentration and PGE's are only slightly

anomalous. The results of testing on the massive sulphides suggest that the showing has Sudbury ore type ratios of nickel to

copper. However, the property is not in the Sudbury ore

environment.

Massive pyrite/pyrrhotite mineralization is interpreted as

being associated with sodic alteration. Substantial quartz

veining is confined to an area approximately 500 ft by 4000 ft and follows a north-south trend. The sodic alteration in the

area is widely spaced. It is suggested that the intrusion of

Nipissing diabase dykes contributed to the emplacement of the massive sulphides. The mineralization is likely related to the

main structure of the area. Quartz and later mineralization are

highly discordant to the regional strike of the rocks.

Magnetometer surveys indicate that the zone of mineralization is restricted. Other magnetic anomalies appear to

e

be linear and narrow in nature and are interpreted as being

caused by diabase dykes. In a number of places on the property diabase has been observed.

A large swamp to the east also appears to define a major

east-west lineament. Its occurrence could represent the

intersection point of the two inferred structural trends and the focus of the sulphide emplacement.

Falconbridge Ltd. has examined the massive pyrite/pyrrhotite showing microscopially, by electron microprobe and XRD. The

sulphides are polymineralic. Massive pyrite and marcasite

contain rare inclusions of pentlandite and violarite (iron-nickel

sulphide). Pyrite and marcasite are intergrown and occur in approximately equal percentages. The pyrrhotite is massive and

exhibits a monoclinic crystal form. Rare inclusions of violarite

occupy *CO.^ of the analyzed sample volume and are ^0 microns in size.

Since Mr. Salo staked his claims ,in October 1986, a tremendous number of geochemical analyses have been completed on the property. Property evaluations for most companies has meant

visiting the property and taking samples to assay for geochemistry.

In the fall of 1986, the Ministry of Northern Development and Mines visited the property. Seven grab samples were taken and analyzed for Cu, Pb, Zn, Ni, Co, Cr, Au, Pt and Pd. Samples of massive pyrrhotite showed anomalous values of Ni and Cu but at

sub-economic grades. The results indicated that the samples exhibit the Sudbury type ratio of nickel to copper. However, the

property was not considered to be in the Sudbury ore environment. Precious metal contents were disappointing with no anomalous

values in any of the samples.

Inco Ltd. conducted a property examination on April 30 and May 13, 1987. A total of 26 grab and chip samples were collected and analysed for Cu, Ni, Co, Au, Pt and Pd . Assays of samples

taken from Pitltl show sub-economic base metal grades. The highest combined grade was D.562% Cu, Q.356% Ni and Q.172% Co

over approximately l m. Gold was present in anomalous concentrations in the samples, the best assay being a grab sample

with 990 ppb Au.

Sixteen samples were sent to Falconbridge Ltd. for analysis

in the summer of 1987. Each rock was briefly described and

selected samples were assayed and/or analyzed for major oxides

and trace elements. The highest Ni and Cu values were 150 ppm

and 96 ppm respectively. Precious metal values were low with the

highest Au content being 18 ppb. Pt, Pd and Ag were all below detection limits.

B.P. Selco Ltd. conducted a property examination and

collected seven grab samples from pits #1, 2 and 9 for Ni, Cu,

Pt, Pd and Au analysis. Once again these samples showed sub

economic grades for Ni and Cu. The best assays for Ni and Cu in

this set of samples was D.547% Ni and iL.15% Cu. Gold was present

in anomalous concentrations in these samples with the highest

assay being 94 ppb. Platinum concentrations were 15 ppb for each sample.

Inco Gold visited the property to collect samples from the

exploration pits. A total of 18 grab and chip samples were

collected and analyzed for the major economic metals Ni, Cu, Pb,

Zn, Co, and Ag with emphasis on Au content. Results were

comparable to previously assayed samples. The highest analyses

obtained were 3.23* Cu, D.744% Ni, D.570% Co, D.195% Pb, 15 ppm

Zn and 310 ppb Au. No Ag anomalies were detected.

In 1988, Mr Salo sunk a small exploration shaft into the

main showing area of the property. Several grab samples were

taken from the exploration shaft. These samples were sent for

analysis to the Ministry of Northern Development and Mines and

Falconbridge Ltd. The Ministry analyzed these samples for Cu,

Ni, Co, Au, Pt, and Pd. The highest results were Q.862% Ni,

Q.225% Cu and Q.0461% Co. The highest precious metal contents

were 24 ppb Au and 305 ppb Pd.

10

Samples sent to Falconbridge Ltd. showed similar results.

The highest Ni and Cu values were X.47% and G.01% respectively.

Precious metal content remained consistent with previous assays, the highest values being 0.43 g/t Au, 0.13 g/t Pd and 0.02 g/t

Pt. Interestingly, one sample contained 9.4 g/t Ag and was the

only silver anomaly observed on the property.

For Ni-Cu contents to be ore grade, a deposit needs S-10% Ni and S-5% Cu. The previous results indicate sub-economic grades

for the property, although deposit grades are unknown at depth. The average Ni content from surface sampling averages 0.73 % Ni.

Geophysics

Many geophysical surveys and reports have been completed

on the property. These surveys have been described in the

"History of the Salo Property" section of this report. Geophysics has been the primary exploration technique used on the

property and much of the work has been duplicated. Therefore, only the highlights will be dealt with in this report.

Three main zones have been interpreted from the geophysical data. (Fig. 82) Zones A, B and C display the largest anomalies,

whereas smaller anomalies include zones D and E.Zone A is of primary interest. It is centred around a small

magnetic high that corresponds directly to pit #1 (L335E, 525N).

The pit has been sampled and assayed and the results show

anomalous values of Ni, Cu, and Au. In general, Zone A shows a large magnetic high with a smaller magnetic low to the north.

This suggests a relatively steeply dipping target. The

mineralization of this zone is probably structurally controlled

by Zone B.Zone B is a long, linear, structurally controlled zone and

is located from L122E, 390N to LO, 460N where it intersects zone C. The magnetic high is accompanied by a small magnetic low to the north. An extension of zone B appears to continue into zone A, possibly controlling the mineralization there.

11Zone C is a relatively large zone approximately 50 m wide.

It extends from LO, 500N to L122E, 570N and intersects zone B on LO, 480N.

The large magnetic high associated with the intersection of zones A and B, and of zones B and C, is of particular interest as

it suggests that the mineralization is structurally controlled.Two other areas of lesser interest (Fig #2) lie to the

south. Zones D and E are narrow linear zones probably associated with a fault or dyke system.

Pits 11 and 10

Throughout 1988 Mr. Salo performed initial trenching and bedrock washing in areas with overburden thicknesses of up to 2m. The resulting exposures and mineralization have been examined and sampled. Trenching was completed manually (pick and shovel) over three areas of interest. The bedrock surface was washed with a

gas powered pump and a pressure nozzle. A Pionjar rock drill was used for drilling into the rock and blasting followed. Pit #1 depth was increased from 2 to 3 metres. A new prospect pit was sunk on a magnetometer and VLF-EM anomaly located at L366E, SOON

to a depth of 5.55 metres.Pit #1 is one of eight old exploration pits on the property.

The pit was sunk to explore pods of massive sulphides existing

within large quartz crystal-lined cavity. This cavity is within

a 6 metre wide northwest-trending quartz vein. The main sulphide pod consists of 70% pyrrhotite, 25% pyrite and 5* chalcopyrite.

Pyrite is observed as cubes up to 5 cm across. These are scattered within massive pyrrhotite and along the pyrrhotite

quartz contact. An accurate strike and dip cannot be determined. The wallrock surrounding the quartz vein consists of Serpent

Formation quartzite to the east and Espanola Formation mudstone to the northwest. Nipissing diabase occurs to the southwest.

Pit #10 is a large massive sulphide showing. The massive

sulphide vein consists of 15% quartz-carbbonate, 50% pyrrhotite,

30% pyrite and 5* chalcopyrite. The vein strikes N 45 E and dips

12

40 SE. The thickness of the vein has not yet been determined. This could best be acheived by drilling a well-positioned hole. The majority of the pyrite consists of rounded nodules averaging 2 or 3 cm in diameter within a matrix of carbonate.

The outcrop area now exposed between pit #1 and pit #10 consists of Espanola Formation limestone with bedding striking N 65 E and dipping 40 SE.

Salo Ore Reserve Model

Mr. Salo has produced a useful model of possible ore reserves on the property. This model may become very useful in the future when accurate Ni and Cu grades are obtained. If the

property is drilled and the true mineralization thickness is determined, ore reserves on the property can be accurately

assessed using this model. A sample extrapolation of possible ore

reserves is included. (Fig. #3)

The following are suggestions that can be implemented in any further exploration strategy for the Salo property:

1. Additional rock trenching (blasting) and stripping should

take place on the main showing area as well as on geophysical anomalies that have been outlined.

2. Detailed geological mapping should be undertaken on the

property. The grid system now in place would provide an

excellent location reference, with the result being the

production of a bedrock geological map.

3. Detailed maps of all trenchs and pits should be produced.

4. A map showing access to the property from Sudbury should

be produced.5. A compilation map of all geological, geochemical and

geophysical data should be produced in order to promote the property to exploration companies.

6. All previous geochemical samples should be organized and reviewed for accuracy in relation to sampling technique. A

13

sample location map of both the property and trenches should be completed.

7.Any further geochemical surveys should be planned in

advance and be completed systematically in order to ensure accurate results.

8. A Pionjar geochemical survey should be considered since

thick overburden would render a B-horizon soil survey a dubious

procedure. Such drilling should sample the bedrock/overburden interface for anomalous geochemical values.

9. Geophysical surveys should take a very low priority in any further exploration strategy since an enormous amount of

geophysical data has already been collected.10. All maps should be neatly drafted for presentation to

exploration companies or potential investors.11. Property promotion should be continued in order to

obtain funding for one or two test holes to study the deposit at depth.

Bibliography

1989 - G. Salo

Report on Prospecting Activities (OP89 - 179): Truman

Township Property.

1988 - A. Insinna

Detailed total field magnetometer survey and report: Salo Property, Truman Township.

1988 - G. Salo

Report on Stripping, Bedrock Washing, Rock Trenching and

Sampling: Salo Property, Truman Township

1988 - L. MacKenzie

Geophysical Assessment Report: Salo Property, Truman

Township.

1988 - M.N.D.M. (R. Campbel fi W. Meyer)

Property examination, samples collected for identification: Salo Property, Truman Township

1988 - Kerr Addison Mines Ltd. (F.W. Nielsen S P. Lewis)

Property examination and report: Salo Property, Truman Township.

1988 - Inco Gold (E. Makela)

Property examination and assay report: Salo Property, Truman Township.

1988 - Anbil Exploration (Richardson S Watkins)

Magnetometer and VLF surveys: Salo Property, Truman

Township.

1987 - Aerodat Ltd. (M. Berezowsky a L .E. Reed), for BP Canada

Selco Division.

Report on combined helicopter - borne magnetic and VLF

survey: Vermilion Project.

1987 - BP Canada (D. Gamble) Selco DivisionProperty examination and assay report: Salo Property,

Truman Township.

1987 - Falconbridge Ltd. (D. Comba)Property examination and assay report, reference file

28777, samples from Salo property, Truman Township

1987 - Inco Ltd. (E. Makela)

Property examination and assay report: Salo Property, Truman Township.

15

1986 - M.N.D.R. (R. Campbell)

Property examination and assay report: Salo Property,

Truman Township.

1984 - Aerodat Ltd. (R. Yee) for LAC Minerals Ltd.Report on combined helicopter - borne magnetic and EM

survey: Truman Township.

OM

I*-: -; xi Kv•Mft i vX i

lg 8Ot*

gS8 "5 g*8

i 1fv*i1o•* i•12'

>tt10K

I/I

2t OJ

**4

9W<

X?i, ^

^1^:tr

m *Ui

5? vi M

rf^

I-

\"

7* tX

i':- .

r: 7

rv.

4.

O•?

K ft, r\o mtAcf'S d i f

o*,

t i**i wc8

4j8 v*

*S f* i

N

\ co.. y*vcAc^ s /0,000 'bs.

10

HO

."73*7. Wt q.îe fs

M; og 31 S;340. Ib

•Vo c

"7. M\

\0

3^5000

15000. SE 5050.

1050000,/,575/ODO,

735000.

M* *

Ienit

"c

63.5567 DIEPPE 030

OP89 - 179DIEPPE TWP. PROPERTY SUDBURY MINING DIVISION

REPORT ON PROSPECTING ACTIVITIES

By Gordon Salo

41ie6SW0014 63.SS67 DIEPPE 030C

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

INTRODUCTION l

DESCRIPTION OF WORK PERFORMED l

HISTORY S DEVELOPMENT . l

LOCATION MAP 2

CLAIM MAP 3

RESULTS OF WORK COMPLETED .4

CONCLUSIONS S RECOMMENDATIONS 4

SAMPLE DESCRIPTIONS 5

ASSAY RESULTS 6-11

(1)INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this report is to provide a general description and summary of the results of field work performed by myself from July 15,1989 to Aug. 7,1989.

The property of which I own an interest in Dieppe Township, consists of two claims in good standing (1076027,1076026).

The claims are located in the central northern section of Dieppe Township. The claims can be accessed via Highway 17 west to regional road # 10 (formerly 549) to the Northshore Rd. and walking trail to the claims. The only facilities to note are the exploration pits and trenches on the property.

Description of work performed

Stripping of overburden ranging in thickness of up to .3 meterswas accomplished manually by pick and shovel over an area ofhigh magnetic response. A Pionjar rock drill and explosives wereused for rock trenching and pitting.A pit was sunk on a new showing discovered while prospectingthe property with a magnetometer.Seven grab samples were collected from an old showing located onthe property as well as the new showing that has been discovered,


GORDON SALO1989 - Prospecting

- Manual stripping- Rock trenching and pitting- Sample collecting

URANEX RESOURCES LTD. 1986 - Line cutting

-V.L.F., Magnetic and Radiometric surveys- Geological survey

MATTAGAMI LAKE MINES LIMITED1976 - Diamond drilling 6 holes totalling 2564'1975 - Line cutting

- Induced polorization and magnetic surveys

CHELLEW MINES LIMITED1957 - Diamond driMing l hole 40.3'

if'^îfe''.^-:

1 ' (\ c ^^--iv '

(4)

RESULTS OF WORK COMPLETED UNDER PROSPECTING PROJECT

OP89 - 179

Prospecting on the property was aided with the use of a Scintrex Mp-2 proton precision total field magnetometer with a sensitivity of .1 gamma.

Numerous magnetic anomallies were located throughout the property. The strongest anomally found gave readings of up to 75,000 gammas. (See map).

This anomally was then stripped of overburden over an area approxi mately 7 meters long and 2 meters wide. A pit was then drilled and blasted to a depth of 2 meters. The outcrop exposed consisted of intensely silicified sediments of possibly the serpent formation.

Sulphide was found in disseminated form to massive patches and pods up to 5cms. across.

Selected grab samples contained uo to 601 Magnetite, 101 pyrite and 10% chalcopyrite. The western face of the pit face would appear to be a slick and slide surface which strikes due North and dips vertically and may possibly be a source for the sulphide minera lization found in the trench. Three grab samples were collected from this new pit.

Some old trenches were found on claim number 1076027 which may represent the old chellew occurence. Once again the rock types seem to be silicified sediments of the serpent formation with similar sulphide mineralization as the new showing on claim number 1076026. Four grab samples were collected from this area.

CONCLUSIONS S RECOMMENDATIONS

The sulphide showings uncovered from this prospecting project would indicate a zone of possible sulphide mineralization over a strike length of 1000' or more. Mineralized zones give a definite magnetic response. I would suggest the following work should be pursued on the claims.

1. A detailed grid be cut with line spacing of 100'.2. Mag. S V.L.F. survey over the grid on 25' station spacing.3. Extensive prospecting , stripping and trenching of geophysical response areas.4. Sampling and geological mapping.

(5)

DIEPPE TOWNSHIP

SAMPLE DESCRIPTIONS

SAMPLE#

9. Silicified serpent sediments

10.

11.

12.

13. " " "

14 . " Sulphides have weathered copper brass color

15. " old drill core sample

Po

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

% SULPHIDE

Py

3-5

5-10

1-2

-

2-3

^2-3

1-2

Cpy

1-2

1-2

5-10

3-5

2-3

2-3

1-2

Magnetite

50-60

2-3

2-3

- -

-

-

-

Bondar-Clcgg Si Company Lid5420Canotek Rpad Ottawa, Ontario

613) 74KO Telex 053-3233

(6)


BONDAR-CLEGG

REPORT! 089-54023.0 { COHPLETE )

CLIENT: GORDON PROJECT: NONE

SALO

REFERENCE INFO:

SUBMITTED 6Y: GORDON SALO DATE PRINTEDJ 22-DEC-89

ORDER

1 Li 2 Be

NUKBER OF LOWER ELEHENT ANALYSES DETECTION LIMIT

LithiuR 23 1 PPH Beryl liuB 23 0.5 PPM

EXTRACTION

HCL-HN03, (3:1) HCL-HN03, (3:1)

METHOD

Ind. Coupled Plasna Ind. Coupled Plasia

3 Se 4 V 5 Cr 6 Co 7 Ni

Scandiui Vanadium Chroiiua Cobalt Nickel

23 1 PPH 23 1 PPH 23 1 PPH 23 1 PP* 23 1 PPH

HCL-HN03, (3:1) HCL-HN03, (3:1) HCL-HN03, (3:1) HCL-HN03, (3il) HCL-HN03, (3:1)


8 Cu 9 Zn

10 Ga 11 As 12 Rb

Copper Zinc Gallius Arsenic Rubidiun




A 13 Sr 14 Y 15 Zr 16 Nb 17 Ho

Strontiui Yttriui Zirconiim Niobiui Molybdenun




18 Ag 19 Cd 20 Sn 21 Sb 22 Te

Silver Cadmium Tin Ant i Bony TelluriuB

23 0.2 PPH 23 1 PPH 23 20 PPH 23 5 PPH 23 10 PPH



23 6a 24 La 25 Ce 26 Ta 27 t

Bariuu Lanthanun Ceriun Tantalum Tungsten



Ind. Coupled Plasia Ind. Coupled Plasia Ind, Coupled Plasia Ind. Coupled Plasia Ind. Coupled Plasia

28 Pb 29 Bi 30 Cr 31 Pd 32 Pd

Lead Bisiuth ChroniuB Palladiun

Rew Palladiun Reweighs

23 2 PPH 23 2 PPH 23 2 PPH 23 1 PPB 1 1PP6

HCL-HN03, (3:1) HCL-HN03, (3:1)

AQUA REGIA

Ind. Coupled Plasia Ind. Coupled Plasia X-Ray Fluorescence F i re Assay/DC Plasia

33 Pd 34 Pt

35 Pt 36 Pt 37 Au

Rew PalladiuR Reweighs Platinui

Rew Platinua Reweighs Rew Platinun Reweighs

Gold

1 1 PPB 23 5 PPB 1 5 PPB 1 5 PPB

23 1 PPB

AQUA REGIA

AQUA REGIA

F i re Assay/DC Plasma

FireAssay/DC Plasia

(7)

Bondar-Clegg A Company LtdM20eanotekRJad Ottawa, ( KIJ9G2'

13) 749-2220 Telex 05.1-323.1


BONDAR-CLEGG

REPORT: 089-54023,0 ( COMPLETE )

. CLIENT: GORDON SALO PROJECT: NONE

REFERENCE INFO:

SU6HITTED 6Yt GORDON SALO DATE PRINTED: 22-DEC-89

NUMBER OF LOWER ORDER ELEMENT ANALYSES DETECTION LIMIT EXTRACTION METHOD

38 Au Rew Au Reweighs 1 1 PP6 39 Au Rew Au Reneighs 1 1 PP8

SAMPLE TYPES NUMBER SIZE FRACTIONS NUMBER SAMPLE PREPARATIONS NUMBER

ROCK 23 -200!i }

23 Crush, Pulverize -200 23

REHARKS: THE SAHPLES HAVE VERY HIGH LEVELS OF FE, CA AND HG.

REPORT COPIES TOs 806 CONNAUGHT AVE, INVOICE TO*, 806 CONNAUGHT AVE,

Bondar-Clegg & Company Ltd 5420 Canotek Road Ottawa. ( K1J902

3) 749-2210 Telex 053-3233

(8)

BONDAR-CLEGG


DATE PRINTED! 22-DEC-89REPORT! 089-54023,0

. SAMPLE ELEMENT Li NUMBER UNITS PPM

Be PPM

Se PPM

V PPM

Cr PPM

Co PPM

PROJECT:

Ni PPM

NONE

Cu PPM

Zn PPM

PAGE 1A

Ga As PPM PPM

01S 402 4 03 f Q/r l04 UX1 405 Y!/^ < l

97,6 7,4

65.6 5.8

103.5

4 9

32 1 5

12 57 27 4

15

55 165 113 355 22

362 13

322 85 675

2315 57

1061 19

1516

349 98

979 126

1885

5

4 20

9 ^ V 20 G 234 30

06 1 07 4 08/ <l 09^ 410 ^ 6

89.1 28,6

107,7 51.1 76.1

9 4 3 1 2

20 10 12 10 14

38 301 45

141 143

328 367

1375 1013 2078

1365 326 4191 3137 6345

974 618

7361 2437 1322

44

508 6

tf 20 4 17 4 38 ^ 1261 ^ 3062

\\(®^ 5 i/ j i13 \ 4 14 2i5y s

45.8 10.9 11,8 14.7 13.7

2 3

2 7

8 16 4

10 72

156 260 258 215 320

2635 217 182 453 45

2566 73 59

757 156

^0000 ^0000 1679 16703

604

1

10

^ 4329 4 282 ^ 133 3 838 9 5

^

"^ J 418 l s\(^ *1^(/f.iy^ ^20 V l/1^ 25

27.9 141.1 112.2 133.6 12.7

55 3 2 3

12

42 15 13 16 26

102 22

169 7

95

624 528

4816 395 10

637 4661 1318 5331

82

3668 858

18907 3880 134 7

10 10 ^ 17 ^ 153 ^ 7

21 <l 22 1 237 4

96.5 35.3

110.9

2 44 2

17 2814

126 114 165

529 557 4168

6015 144 1051

6401 ^0000

83544

^ 21 ^ 48 ^ 74

(9)Bondar-Gegg ft Company Lid5420 panotek RoadOttawa,Kl J 902

3) 749-20 Telex 053-3233


BONDAR-CLEGG

DATE PRINTED! 22-DEC-89REPORT! 089-54023,0

. SAMPLE ELEMENT Rb Sr NUMBER UNITS PPM PPM

PROJECT! NONE PAGE 16

Y Zr Nb Mo Ag Cd PPM PPM PPM PPM PPH PPM

Sn Sb PPM PPM

Te PPM

01\ (20 2 02 79 4 03 1 25 13 04 ^ <20 205 Vf^X 25 1

3 4 4 4 4,2 2 6 47 2 1 4,2 4

14 3 4 4 4,2 1 4 1 4 4 4,2 4 5 4 4 4 4,2 4

(20 (5 ^0 ^ ^0 ^ ^0 ^ ^0 ^

40 40 40 (10 (10

l Ii 06 21 4

07 \ (20 4 i , 08y 32 1

09^ <20 2 10 j 65 3

7 9 <l <4 6 4 * 3 4 4 * 3 15 4 i 3 11 4 <

.1 4,2 3 :l 4,2 4 .1 4,2 8 1 4,2 2 1 4,2 5

^0 ^ 40 ^ ^0 ^ ^0 ^

40 40 40 40 40

l ' J rt VSn LAVM/T <2o 212 ( P^ ' 35 3 13 (20 1 14 \ < 20 4 15 y 60 6

2 10 4 ^ 2 6 3

4 2 4 < 4 29 2 4 28 2 *

1 10,9 8 2 5,7 4 1 0.4 4 1 4,4 1 1 4,2 4

40 ^ ^0 ^ (20 <5 (20 (5

40 40 40 40 40

J^^fc

W 16^v 42 36n 4 9 2S ^ ly7*X S 2s 20 y//^" (20 13

24 1 4 < 3 4 4 < 3 4 4 < 3 4 4 < 9 22 1

1 4,2 2 1 4,2 2 1 0,5 3 1 4,2 2 2 4,2 4

(20 (5 (20 (5 (20 (5 (20 (5

40 40 40 40 40

l

21 \ (20 22 22 ) 87 29 23 y 49 2

i

3 5 <l < 24 1 <l <

2 4 4 <

1 4,2 2 1 4,2 4 1 4,2 4

(20 (5 (20 (5

40 40 40

l1

Bondar-Qegg S Company Ltd 5420 Canotek RoadOttawa, Ontario

Telex 053-3233

(10)

BONDAR-CLEGG


DATE PRINTED! 22-DEC-89REPORT:

SAHPLE' NUHBER

089-54023.0

ELEKENTUNITS

KaPPH

LaPPH

CePPH

TaPPH

HPPH

PROJECT)

Pb 6iPPH PPH

NONE

CrPPH

PAGE 1C

Pd Pd RewPP8 PPB

Pd Re*PPB

01 "X 402 3103 7 504 l o 505 l^jj/^ 6

131916415

33818^S

4040404040

40 ^40 240 ^40 ^40 ^

22<211^17

3727058

73232

284

7418

\06 \ 407 7 408/ 409'N 410 j 4

126

154

12

813^^8

4040404040

40 tf40 ^40 3540 tf40 4

114

297

15

36514

3420197

212

728

14j - of' 11 1 f\ , j j2f 3

12 \ Nî l 8f, 13 5

14 6V 82

35227

71466

14

4040404040

<10 <2<10 440 240 440 ^

6513

394

320602559348554

254 4 4444

^fcA 16^ 3

17 5t 18 7 , 2

19 j ÂP 2I 20 y(/^ 2

414

21421

119^^^45

4040404040

40 5240 ^40 ^<10 <240 ^

43039274

^195015

116

127014854

*21 222 323 2s y

171

13

^41<5

404040

<10 121<10 2040 ^

194231

228

45

835

12

•i i ^fl^î 1 -*

{IDj. Bondar-Clcgg A Company Ltd

5420 Canotek'Road Otta KIJ

220 Telex 053-3233


BONDAR-CLEGG

DATE PRINTED} 22-DEC-89REPORT: 089-54023.0

. SAMPLENUH6ER

ELEMENTUNITS

PtPP8

Pt RewPP6

Pt RewPPB

AuPPB

Au RewPPB

PROJECT! NONE

Au RewPPB

PAGE ID

<5 <5 <5 <5 <5

613126

56

<555

137

1282419

<5

<5 <5

381780189666

2030 1890

<5 <5 <5

IT <5 <5

442

31014

"TT

369 118

983789 963783 983761 -983782

tie //ne'

I 800

943594 .984039 S 147452* 943596943595 "

tie line V

et. su.— .-J^f.as

984044

984043943596943597984041

mefers

984045

Jo? ffl-

964042- qrassy swamp

983780

\

32. ISO

' 200' XX)' 400' 500' 600' 7OO' BOO'

PROSPECTING ACTIVITES as-o7.!5t030-oi-êGORDON SALO PROPERTYTRUMAN TWP. LAKE PANACHE ONT.SCALE 1 CM. - 20 M

DRAWN BY CORD SALO ôX~ X&r

411065*8*14 63.5567 DIEPPE 200

983782

tie. lin? B

^84039 943S4 S 147452

f Y e i/'n

V.a.R RESULTS TRUMAN TWR-IN PHASE PLOT

OF LINE 4 A SSUMED

r? p/iasc

scale'-Imm * i /i

' 700' 800'

SALO

Drawn By: GORDON SALO: APRIL Z3. 1^38 FOR OR\G\ONRL bUkVES

964045b Q s e f/'n

384042

EADINGS .L-OE, 575 NSWAMP488 E, 300 N f o 91 5 EED DEC 1339 BY GORD SALOAND' P

\ 963789 983763 983782 96376! -'

tie i trie Djt j.

' /o w f lat area

700 AA '

i 943596 "/G

S 147452943595

i* i c l i ri e A

amptj pona

984044

-/t

194359 98404-ti943597

984045

/OO S

IQO 4- 150 ôo 250

100' 200' 3OO' 4OO' SOO' 6OO' 100'

i, ,VLF SURVEY FRASER FILTEREDGORD SALO PROPERTYTRUMAN TWP. LAKE PANACHE ONTSCALE 1 CM. - 20 M

DRAWN BY. oORD 3ALO DEC

4ll06S*0ei4 63.5567 D IEPPE 220

983789 963763 983782

-''5- ll \ \ *

984039 S 14745294359943595

BOO N tie tin? V

r i e i i ne A

LLG END

PICKET LINE

CLAIM LINE

PIT

S T Ri l r V l; C: OVERBURDEN

CLAIM POST

W A M P

984044

'100 TO 459 G AMMAS (nT.) 5OO TO 749 " 750 T O 990

. IOOO

\:; TO A LADINGS SHOWN943598 984043-?943597

ALL ANOMALY PERIMETERS PLAGE f) OUT

SITE AT fOO GAMMAS ( n T.}

meters

1 200' XX)' 4OO' SOO' 6OO* 7OO' 500*

984045

9537/90A . INS INN A B. S c

-M 200

4,|06SW(Bei4 63.5567 D IEPPE

i ~1C3 III

DETAIL TOTAL FIELD MAGNETOMETER SURVEY

GORDON SALO PROPERTYTRUMAN TWP. LAKE PANACHE ONT.SCALE l CM. - 20 M

4 1983. O RIGIONAL SURVFY

DRAWN BY GORD SALO

LO, 575N to L305E,800Nanrf488E, 300N fo9BE,600N

r/i. i I N SSVAMP READINGS 'TAKEN DEC

O P

/TOe

k-?

PROSPECTING ACTIVITES

DIEPPE TWR LAUhSCALE l C M.-20 M.

C

50 /oo, l f 50

feet /CO' ^00' 30O' 40O' SOO'

DRAWN BY GORD SALO DEC 1969

41ie6SWeOH 63.5567 DIEPPE

Documents

OP89 - 179 TRUMAN TWP. PROPERTY Sudbury Mining Division ... · by Gordon, Edwin and Lucy Salo. - Detail total field Magnetometer survey by Gordon and Ed Salo - Detail picket line