Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change ... 214750.pdf · Current Property Use Industrial Intended Property Use Residential Certificate of Property Use Number No CPU

Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change - Record of Site Condition # 214750

Record of Site Condition

Under Part XV.1 of the Environment Protection Act

Summary

Notice to Readers Concerning Due Diligence

This record of site condition has been filed in the Environmental Site Registry to which the public has

access and which contains a notice advising users of the Environmental Site Registry who have dealings

with any property to consider conducting their own due diligence with respect to the environmental

condition of the property, in addition to reviewing information in the Environmental Site Registry.

Contents of this Record of Site Condition

This record of site condition consists (RSC) of this document which is available to be printed directly from

the Environmental Site Registry as well as all supporting documentation indicated in this RSC to have been

submitted in electronic format to the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change.

Record of Site Condition Number 214750Date Filed to Environmental Site Registry 2014/10/20Certification Date 2014/07/28Current Property Use IndustrialIntended Property Use ResidentialCertificate of Property Use Number No CPUApplicable Site Condition Standards** Full Depth Generic Site Conditions Standard,

with Potable Ground Water, Coarse TexturedSoil, for Residential property use, with RA

Property Municipal Address 58 BEVERLY STREET, CAMBRIDGE, ON, N1R3Z6

1 of 19Filed Record of Site Condition # 214750 on 2014/10/20

PART 1: PROPERTY OWNERSHIP, PROPERTY INFORMATION AND OWNER'S CERTIFICATIONS

Information about the owner who is submitting or authorizing the submission of the RSC

Owner Name WM. & FM. CONSTRUCTIONS INC.

Authorized Person WILLIAM MALLAN

Mailing Address 242 WEST RIVER ROAD, CAMBRIDGEONTARIO, CANADA

Postal Code N1R 5S5

Phone (519) 222-6777

Fax

Email Address [email protected]


RSC Property Location Information

Municipal Address(es) 58 BEVERLY STREET, CAMBRIDGE, ON N1R 3Z6

Municipality Cambridge

Legal Description See Attached Lawyer’s Letter

Assessment Roll Number(s)

300608000201000

Property Identifier Number(s)

03814-0366 (LT)

RSC Property Geographical References

Coordinate System UTM

Datum NAD 83

Zone 17

Easting 555,800.00

Northing 4,801,100.00

RSC Property Use Information

The following types of property uses are defined by the Regulation: Agricultural or other use, Commercial use, Community use, Industrial use, Institutional use, Parkland use, and Residential use.

Current Property Use Industrial

Intended Property Use Residential

Certificate of Property Use has been issued under section 168.6 of the EPA

No


Please See the Signed Statements of Property Owner, or Agent, or Receiver at the End of this RSC

The rest of this page has been left intentionally blank


PART 2: LIST OF REPORTS, SUMMARY OF SITE CONDITIONS AND QUALIFIED PERSON’S STATEMENTS AND CERTIFICATIONSQualified Person's Information

Name BRETON LEMIEUX

Type of Membership Under the Professional Geoscientists Act

Practising Member

Membership Number 0221

QP Employer Name BLUEWATER GEOSCIENCE CONSULTANTS INC.

Mailing Address 42 SHADYRIDGE PLACE, KITCHENERONTARIO, N2N 3J1 CANADA

Phone (519) 744-4123

Fax (519) 744-1863

Email Address [email protected]

Municipal Information

Local or Single-Tier Municipality

Cambridge

Upper-Tier Municipality Waterloo

Ministry of the Environment District Office

District Office Guelph District Office

District Office Address 1 Stone Road W., Guelph ON N1G 4Y2


Phase One Environmental Site Assessment ReportDocument used as the phase one environmental site assessment report and updates in submitting the RSC for filing

The date the last work on all of the records review, interviews and site reconnaissance components of the phase one environmental site assessment was done (refer to clause 28(1)(a) of O. Reg. 153/04)

(YYYY/MM/DD)

2014/08/14

Type of Report

Report Title Date of Report (YYYY/MM/DD)

Author of Report

Name of ConsultingCompany

P1 ESA Phase One Environmental Site Assessment, 58 Beverly St., Cambridge

2012/10/26 Breton Lemieux, M.Sc., P.Geo.,QP

BLUEWATER GEOSCIENCE CONSULTANTS INC.

P1 ESA Update

Phase One ESA Update, 58 Beverly Street, Cambridge 2014/08/18 Breton Lemieux, M.Sc., P.Geo., QP


Reports and Other Documents Related to the Phase One Environmental Site AssessmentReports and other documents relied upon in certifying the information set out in section 10 of Schedule A or otherwise used in conducting the phase one environmental site assessment


Author of Report


N/A


Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment ReportDocument used as the phase two environmental site assessment report and updates in submitting the RSC for filing

The date the last work on all of the planning of the site investigation and conducting the site investigation components of the phase two environmental site assessment was done (refer to clause 33.5(1)(a) of O. Reg. 153/04)

(YYYY/MM/DD)

2014/07/28

Type of Report


Author of Report


P2 ESA Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment, 58 Beverly Street, Cambridge

2014/08/07 Breton Lemieux, M.Sc., P.Geo., QP


P2 ESA Update

Phase Two ESA Update, 58 Beverly Street, Cambridge 2014/08/25 Breton Lemieux, M.Sc., P.Geo., QP


Reports and Other Documents Related to the Phase Two Environmental Site AssessmentReports and other documents relied upon in making any certifications in the RSC for the purposes of Part IV of Schedule A or otherwise used in conducting the phase two environmental site assessment

Report Title Date of Report (YYYY/MM/DD).

Author of Report


Contamination Investigation, International Stock Foods, 58 Beverly St., Cambridge

1989/09/28 Eric Chung, P.Eng.

Dominion Soil Investigation Inc.

Phase II Environmental Site Assessment, 58 Beverly St., Cambridge 2007/12/17 Jeff Stevenson, P. Geo.

Terrapex Environmental Ltd.

Remedial Excavation Monitoring, 58 Beverly St., Cambridge 2008/04/09 Jeff Stevenson, P. Geo.

Terrapex Environmental Ltd.


Environmental ConditionSection 41 applies? No

Section 43.1 applies? No

Site Condition InformationCertification date (YYYY/MM/DD) 2014/07/28

Total area of RSC property (in hectares) 0.17000

Number of any previously filed RSC that applies to any part of the RSC property 45209

Number of any previously filed Transition Notice that applies to any part of the RSC property

Soil Texture Coarse

Assessment/Restoration Approach Full Depth Generic

Site investigation includes the investigation, sampling and analysis of ground water? Yes

Is there soil present that is sufficient to investigate, sample and analyze soil on, in or under the property in accordance with s. 6, Schedule E of O.Reg. 153/04?

Yes

Site investigation includes the investigation, sampling and analysis of soil on, in or under the property which is used in the RSC?

Yes

Name of the laboratory used to analyze any samples collected of soil, ground water or sediment

ALS LABORATORIES

Ground water condition (potable, non-potable) Potable

Applicable Site Condition Standard TABLE 2

Risk Assessment InformationA risk assessment has been prepared and accepted by the Director in support of this RSC?

Yes

Risk assessment identification number RA1321-13

Risk assessment was a site specific risk assessment completed and approved in accordance with the Cleanup Guideline 1996?

No


Table 1 – Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards

Measured Concentration for Contaminants in Soil

ContaminantName

Maximum Concentration

Applicable Site Condition Standard

Unit of Measure

1 Acetone < 0.5 16 µg/g

2 Benzene < 0.02 0.21 µg/g

3 Bromodichloromethane < 0.05 1.5 µg/g

4 Bromoform < 0.05 0.27 µg/g

5 Bromomethane < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

6 Carbon Tetrachloride < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

7 Chlorobenzene < 0.05 2.4 µg/g

8 Dibromochloromethane < 0.05 2.3 µg/g

9 Chloroform < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

10 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2- < 0.05 1.2 µg/g



13 Dichlorodifluoromethane < 0.05 16 µg/g

14 Dichloroethane, 1,1- < 0.05 0.47 µg/g

15 Dichloroethane, 1,2- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

16 Dichloroethylene, 1,1- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

17 Dichloroethylene, 1,2-cis- < 0.05 1.9 µg/g

18 Dichloroethylene, 1,2-trans- < 0.05 0.084 µg/g

19 Dichloropropene,1,3- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

20 Methylene Chloride < 0.05 0.1 µg/g

21 Dichloropropane, 1,2- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

22 Dichloropropene,1,3- < 0.03 0.05 µg/g

23 Ethylbenzene < 0.05 1.1 µg/g

24 Hexane (n) < 0.05 2.8 µg/g

25 Methyl Ethyl Ketone < 0.5 16 µg/g

26 Methyl Isobutyl Ketone < 0.5 1.7 µg/g

27 Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE) < 0.05 0.75 µg/g

28 Styrene < 0.05 0.7 µg/g

29 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,1,2- < 0.05 0.058 µg/g

30 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,2,2- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

31 Tetrachloroethylene < 0.05 0.28 µg/g

32 Toluene < 0.2 2.3 µg/g

33 Trichloroethane, 1,1,1- < 0.05 0.38 µg/g

34 Trichloroethane, 1,1,2- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

35 Trichloroethylene < 0.05 0.061 µg/g

36 Trichlorofluoromethane < 0.05 4 µg/g

37 Vinyl Chloride < 0.02 0.02 µg/g

38 Xylene Mixture < 0.05 3.1 µg/g

39 Acenaphthene < 0.05 7.9 µg/g


39 Acenaphthene < 0.05 7.9 µg/g

40 Acenaphthylene < 0.05 0.15 µg/g

41 Anthracene < 0.05 0.67 µg/g

42 Benz[a]anthracene 0.117 0.5 µg/g

43 Benzo[a]pyrene 0.089 0.3 µg/g

44 Benzo[b]fluoranthene 0.068 0.78 µg/g

45 Benzo[ghi]perylene < 0.05 6.6 µg/g

46 Benzo[k]fluoranthene 0.081 0.78 µg/g

47 Chrysene 0.095 7 µg/g

48 Dibenz[a h]anthracene < 0.05 0.1 µg/g

49 Fluoranthene 0.205 0.69 µg/g

50 Fluorene < 0.05 62 µg/g

51 Indeno[1 2 3-cd]pyrene < 0.05 0.38 µg/g

52 Methlynaphthalene, 2-(1-) *** < 0.042 0.99 µg/g

53 Naphthalene < 0.05 0.6 µg/g

54 Pyrene 0.17 78 µg/g

55 Phenanthrene 0.095 6.2 µg/g

56 Antimony < 1 7.5 µg/g

57 Arsenic 3.6 18 µg/g

58 Barium 28.7 390 µg/g

59 Beryllium < 0.5 4 µg/g

60 Boron (total) 7 120 µg/g

61 Cadmium 0.57 1.2 µg/g

62 Chromium Total 12.8 160 µg/g

63 Cobalt 5.3 22 µg/g

64 Copper 17.7 140 µg/g

65 Lead 23.3 120 µg/g

66 Molybdenum < 1 6.9 µg/g

67 Nickel 6.3 100 µg/g

68 Selenium < 1 2.4 µg/g

69 Silver < 0.2 20 µg/g

70 Thallium < 0.5 1 µg/g

71 Uranium < 1 23 µg/g

72 Vanadium 21.6 86 µg/g

73 Zinc 228 340 µg/g

74 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F1**** < 5 55 µg/g

75 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 < 10 98 µg/g




Table 1 – Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards (Continued)

Ground Water

ContaminantName

Maximum Concentration

Applicable Site Condition Standard

Unit of Measure

1 Acetone < 30 2700 µg/L

2 Benzene < 0.5 5 µg/L

3 Bromodichloromethane < 2 16 µg/L

4 Bromoform < 5 25 µg/L

5 Bromomethane < 0.5 0.89 µg/L

6 Carbon Tetrachloride < 0.2 0.79 µg/L

7 Chlorobenzene < 0.5 30 µg/L

8 Dibromochloromethane < 2 25 µg/L

9 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2- < 0.5 3 µg/L



12 Dichlorodifluoromethane < 2 590 µg/L

13 Dichloroethane, 1,1- < 0.5 5 µg/L

14 Dichloroethane, 1,2- < 0.5 1.6 µg/L

15 Dichloroethylene, 1,1- < 0.5 1.6 µg/L

16 Dichloroethylene, 1,2-cis- < 0.5 1.6 µg/L

17 Dichloroethylene, 1,2-trans- < 0.5 1.6 µg/L

18 Dichloropropene,1,3- < 0.5 0.5 µg/L

19 Methylene Chloride < 5 50 µg/L

20 Ethylbenzene < 0.5 2.4 µg/L

21 Dichloropropane, 1,2- < 0.5 5 µg/L

22 Hexane (n) < 0.5 51 µg/L

23 Methyl Ethyl Ketone < 20 1800 µg/L

24 Methyl Isobutyl Ketone < 2 640 µg/L

25 Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE) < 0.5 15 µg/L

26 Styrene < 0.5 5.4 µg/L

27 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,1,2- < 0.5 1.1 µg/L

28 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,2,2- < 0.5 1 µg/L

29 Tetrachloroethylene < 0.5 1.6 µg/L

30 Toluene < 0.5 24 µg/L

31 Trichloroethane, 1,1,1- < 0.5 200 µg/L

32 Trichloroethane, 1,1,2- < 0.5 4.7 µg/L

33 Trichloroethylene 0.71 1.6 µg/L

34 Trichlorofluoromethane < 5 150 µg/L

35 Vinyl Chloride < 0.3 0.5 µg/L

36 Xylene Mixture < 0.5 300 µg/L

37 Acenaphthene < 0.02 4.1 µg/L

38 Acenaphthylene < 0.02 1 µg/L

39 Anthracene < 0.02 2.4 µg/L


39 Anthracene < 0.02 2.4 µg/L

40 Benz[a]anthracene < 0.02 1 µg/L

41 Benzo[a]pyrene < 0.01 0.01 µg/L

42 Benzo[b]fluoranthene < 0.02 0.1 µg/L

43 Benzo[ghi]perylene < 0.02 0.2 µg/L

44 Benzo[k]fluoranthene < 0.02 0.1 µg/L

45 Chrysene < 0.02 0.1 µg/L

46 Dibenz[a h]anthracene < 0.02 0.2 µg/L

47 Fluoranthene < 0.02 0.41 µg/L

48 Fluorene < 0.02 120 µg/L

49 Indeno[1 2 3-cd]pyrene < 0.02 0.2 µg/L

50 Methlynaphthalene, 2-(1-) *** < 0.028 3.2 µg/L

51 Naphthalene < 0.02 11 µg/L

52 Phenanthrene < 0.02 1 µg/L

53 Pyrene < 0.02 4.1 µg/L

54 Antimony < 0.5 6 µg/L

55 Arsenic < 1 25 µg/L

56 Barium 121 1000 µg/L

57 Beryllium < 0.5 4 µg/L

58 Boron (total) 67 5000 µg/L

59 Cadmium < 0.1 2.7 µg/L

60 Chromium Total 0.69 50 µg/L

61 Cobalt < 0.5 3.8 µg/L

62 Copper 1.6 87 µg/L

63 Lead < 1 10 µg/L

64 Molybdenum 1.84 70 µg/L

65 Nickel < 1 100 µg/L

66 Selenium < 5 10 µg/L

67 Silver < 0.1 1.5 µg/L

68 Thallium < 0.3 2 µg/L

69 Uranium < 2 20 µg/L

70 Vanadium < 0.5 6.2 µg/L

71 Zinc 110.1 1100 µg/L

72 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F1**** < 25 750 µg/L

73 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 < 100 150 µg/L




See the attached “Table 2, Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Standards Specified in a Risk Assessment” for standards specified in a risk assessment and comparison to maximum

concentrations measured on, in or under the RSC property.

The rest of this page has been left intentionally blank


Remedial Action and Mitigation

Remediated Soils

Estimated quantities of the soil, if any, originating at and remaining on the RSC property that have been remediated, at a location either on or off the property, to reduce the concentration of contaminants in the soil. Indicate the remediation process or processes used and the estimated amount of soil remediated by each identified process.

Soil Remediation Process Estimated Quantity of Soil (in-ground volume in m³)

Description of Remediation

Description of any action taken to reduce the concentration of contaminants (including soil removals) on, in or under the RSC property.

Soil removal with off-site disposal

Soil or Sediment Removed and Not Returned

Estimated quantities of soil or sediment, if any, removed from and not returned to the RSC property.

Estimated Quantity of Soil (in-ground volume in m³) 81.0

Estimated Quantity of Sediment (in-ground volume in m³)

Soil Brought to the Property

Estimated quantity of the soil, if any, being brought from another property to and deposited at the RSC property, not including any soil that may have originated at but been remediated off the RSC property and that is identified in section 28 of Schedule A.

Estimated Quantity of Soil Brought to the Property(in-ground volume in m³)


Ground Water Control or Treatment Measures

Ground water control or treatment measures that were required for the RSC property prior to the certification date for the purpose of submitting the RSC for filing.

Ground water control or treatment measures that are required for the RSC property after the certification date.

Estimated volume of ground water, if any, removed from and not returned to the RSC property.

Estimated Volume of Ground Water (in litres)


Other Activities Including Risk Management Measures

Constructed works that prior to the certification date for the purpose of submitting the RSC for filing, were required to control or otherwise mitigate the release or movement of known existing contaminants at the RSC property.

Constructed works that after the certification date, are required to control or otherwise mitigate the release or movement of known existing contaminants at the RSC property.

Monitoring or Maintenance

Soil Management Measures

Soil monitoring requirements or any requirements for care, maintenance or replacement or any monitoring or control works for known existing contaminants, if any, on the RSC property, after the certification date.

Ground Water Management Measures

Ground water monitoring requirements or requirements for care, maintenance or replacement of any monitoring or control works or known existing contaminants, if any, on the RSC property, after the certification date.

Remediated or Removed Soil, Sediment or Ground Water From Near Property Boundary

Has any soil, sediment or ground water at the RSC property that is or was located within 3 metres of the RSC property boundary been remediated or removed for the purpose of remediation?

No


Qualified Person’s Statements and CertificationsAs the qualified person, I certify that:

A phase one environmental site assessment of the RSC property, which includes the evaluation of the information gathered from a records review, site reconnaissance, interviews, a report and any updates required, has been conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under the supervision of a qualified person as required by the regulation.

A phase two environmental site assessment of the RSC property, which includes the evaluation of the information gathered from planning and conducting a site investigation, a report, and any updates required, has been conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under the supervision of a qualified person as required by the regulation.

The information represents the site conditions at the sampling points at the time of sampling only and the conditions between and beyond the sampling points may vary.

As of 2014/07/28, in my opinion, based on the phase one environmental site assessment and the phase two environmental site assessment, and any confirmatory sampling, there is no evidence of any contaminants in the soil, ground water or sediment on, in or under the RSC property that would interfere with the type of property use to which the RSC property will be put, as specified in the RSC.

Ground water sampling has been conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under the supervision of a qualified person as required by the regulation.

As of 2014/07/28, in my opinion, based on the phase one and phase two environmental site assessments and any confirmatory sampling, the RSC property meets the applicable full depth generic site condition standards prescribed by section 36 of the regulation for all contaminants prescribed by the regulation in relation to the type of property use for which this RSC is filed, except for those contaminants (if any) specified in this RSC at Table 2, Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Standards Specified in a Risk Assessment.

As of 2014/07/28, the maximum known concentration of each contaminant in soil, sediment and ground water at the RSC property for which sampling and analysis has been performed is specified in this RSC at Table 1, Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards.

In relation to any contaminant excepted from the certification mentioned above as specified in the RSC at Table 2,Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Standards Specified in a Risk Assessment, or in relation to any other contaminant that in my opinion is likely to cause an adverse effect:

A risk assessment was prepared for the contaminant with respect to the property for which the phasetwo environmental site assessment was conducted.

The Director has accepted the risk assessment under clause 168.5 (1) (a) of the Act.

As of 2014/07/28, the property for which the phase two environmental site assessment was conducted meets the standards specified in the risk assessment for the contaminant.

I am a qualified person and have the qualifications required by section 5 of the regulation.

I have in place an insurance policy that satisfies the requirements of section 7 of the regulation.

I acknowledge that the RSC will be submitted for filing in the Environmental Site Registry, that records of site condition that are filed in the Registry are available for examination by the public and that the Registry contains a notice advising users of the Registry who have dealings with any property to consider conducting their own due diligence with respect to the environmental condition of the property, in addition to reviewing information in the Registry.

The opinions expressed in this RSC are engineering or scientific opinions made in accordance with generally accepted principles and practices as recognized by members of the environmental engineering or science profession or discipline practising at the same time and in the same or similar location.

I do not hold and have not held and my employer BLUEWATER GEOSCIENCE CONSULTANTS INC.does not hold and has not held a direct or indirect interest in the RSC property or any property which includes the RSC property and was the subject of a phase one or two environmental site assessmentor risk assessment upon which this record of site condition is based

To the best of my knowledge, the certifications and statements in this part of the RSC are true as of 2014/07/28.

By signing this RSC, I make no express or implied warranties or guarantees.

By checking the boxes above, and entering my membership/licence number in this submission, I, BRETON LEMIEUX, a qualified person as defined in section 5 of O. Reg. 153/04 am, on 2014/08/28:

a) signing this record of site condition submission as a qualified person; and b) making all certifications required as a qualified person for this record of site condition.

I Agree


Additional Documentation Provided by Property Owner or AgentThe following documents have been submitted to the Ministry of the Environment as part of the record of site condition

Certificate of Status or equivalent for the owner

Lawyer’s letter consisting of a legal description of the property

Copy of any deed(s), transfer(s) or other document(s) by which the RSC property was acquired

A Current plan of Survey

Property Specific Standards

Area(s) of Potential Environmental Concern

Table of Current and Past Uses of the Phase One Property

Phase 2 Conceptual Site Model

Owner or agent certification statements

v 4.1.1


As an owner:

1. I acknowledge that the RSC will be submitted for filing in the Environmental SiteRegistry, tha-t records of site condition that are filed in-the Registry are availablefor-exainination by the public and that the Registry contains-a notice advisingusers of the Re-oistrv who have dealinqs with anv propertv to considerconducting their oWn due diligence with resp-ect to the enviionmenial condition ofthe propefty, in addition to reViewing inform'ation in the Registry.

I have conducted reasonable inquiries to obtain all information relevant to thisRSC. includino information from the other current owners of the RSC propertvnamed in this part of the RSC and I have obtained all information relevant to thiSRSC of which I am aware.

I have disclosed all information referred to in paragraph 2 to any qualified personnamed in this RSC.

2.

3.

4. To my knowledge, the statements made in this part of the RSC are true as ofAugust 26,2014.

phase oneafforded toperson, for

Name of Owner: WM & FM CONSTRUCTIONS lNC.

Date Signed: August 26,2014

Name of Person Sighiig: William Livingstone Mallan

l, William Livingstone Mallan, am authorized to and hereby do bind

WM & FM CONSTRUCTIONS PTY LTD.

5. I have ensured that access to the entire property, including theproperty, any phase two property and the RSC property, has beenine'quiiitied person and' to' peisons superviseil ny tde qualifiedpurposes of conducting the site reconnaissance.


Request ID: 016777117 Province of Ontario Date Report Produced: 2014/08/26Demande n° : Province de l'Ontario Document produit le :Transaction ID: 55196798 Ministry of Government Services Time Report Produced: 10:12:21Transaction n° : Ministère des Services gouvernementaux Imprimé à :Category ID: CTCatégorie :

CERTIFICATE OF STATUSATTESTATION DU STATUT JURIDIQUE

This is to certify that according to the D'après les dossiers du Ministère desrecords of the Ministry of Government Services gouvernementaux, nous attestonsServices que la société

W M & F M C O N S T R U C T I O N S I N C .

Ontario Corporation Number Numéro matricule de la société (Ontario)

0 0 2 3 2 3 4 8 7

is a corporation incorporated, est une société constituée, prorogée ou néeamalgamated or continued under d'une fusion aux termes des lois de lathe laws of the Province of Ontario. Province de l'Ontario.

The corporation came into existence on La société a été fondée le

A P R I L 1 0 A V R I L , 2 0 1 2

and has not been dissolved. et n'est pas dissoute.

Dated Fait le

A U G U S T 2 6 A O Û T , 2 0 1 4

DirectorDirecteur

The issuance of this certifcate in electronic form is authorized by the Ministry of Government Services.

La délivrance du présent certificat sous forme électronique est autorisée par le Ministère des Services gouvernementaux.

Table 2: Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Standards Specified in a Risk Assessment

Risk Assessment Number: RA1321-12

1 of 1

Table 2: Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Standards Specified in a Risk Assessment

Risk Assessment Number 1321-12Applicable Site Condition Standard Table 2

Measured Concentration for Contaminants in SoilContaminant Measurement type Measured Concentration Standard Specified in Risk Assessment Unit of Measurement <none>

Measured Concentration for Contaminants in Ground WaterContaminant Measurement type Measured Concentration Standard Specified in Risk Assessment Unit of Measurement Chloroform Measured 6.4 7.68 ug/l

Measured Concentration for Contaminants in SedimentContaminant Measurement type Measured Concentration Standard Specified in Risk Assessment Unit of Measurement <none>

Phase One ESA Update - RSC Tables - Revised October 2014 58 Beverly Street, Cambridge, ON Job # BG-442

"TABLE OF AREAS OF POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN"

(Refer to clause 16(2)(a), Schedule D, O. Reg. 153/04) 58 Beverly Street, Cambridge, ON

Area of Potential

Environmental Concern

Location of APEC on

Phase One Property

Potentially Contaminating

Activity2

Location of PCA

(on-Site or off-Site)

Contaminants of Potential Concern

3

Media Potentially Impacted (Ground

water, soil and/or

sediment)

APEC 1

On-Site, former fuel storage

adjacent to east side of building

‘Gasoline and Associated Products

Storage in Fixed Tanks’ (MOE

PCA #28)

On-Site, adjacent to east side of

building

PHC, BTEX Soil and

Groundwater

APEC 2

On-Site former industrial

activities in main building

‘Soap and Detergent

Manufacturing and Bulk

Storage’ (MOE PCA #50)

On-Site former

industrial activities

PHC, VOC, metals

Soil and Groundwater

APEC 3

On-Site, in areas of prior

remedial excavations

‘Importation of Fill Materials of

Unknown Quality’ (MOE

PCA #30)

On-Site, in areas of prior

remedial excavations

PHC, metals, PAH

Soil

APEC 4

On-site, along north and east

limits of property

‘Importation of Fill Materials of

Unknown Quality’ (MOE

PCA #30)

On-site, along north and east limits

PHC, metals, PAH

Soil

APEC 5

On-site, along down grade

property boundary

‘Gasoline and Associated Products

Storage in Fixed Tanks’ (MOE

PCA #28)

Off-Site, approx. 30 m

to south across

Beverly Street

PHC, VOC, metals

Groundwater

APEC 6 On Site,

groundwater across Site

Non-PCA, release of municipally

treated water through pipe

and main leaks

Off-site, regional impact to bedrock

groundwater (Non-PCA)

VOC (Chloroform)

Groundwater

Notes: 1 - Area of Potential Environmental Concern means the area on, in or under a phase one property where one or more contaminants are potentially present, as determined through the phase one environmental site assessment, including through,

(a) identification of past or present uses on, in or under the phase one property, and (b) identification of potentially contaminating activity.

2 - Potentially Contaminating Activity means a use or activity set out in Column A of Table 2 of Schedule D that is occurring or has occurred in a Phase one study area 3 - when completing this column, identify all contaminants of potential concern using the Method Groups as identified in the "Protocol for in the Assessment of Properties under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act, March 9, 2004, amended as of July 1, 2011, as specified below:

Metals PAH VOC BTEX

PHC

"TABLE OF CURRENT AND PAST USES OF THE PHASE ONE PROPERTY" (Refer to clause 16(2)(b), Schedule D, O.Reg. 153/04)

58 Beverly Street, Cambridge, ON

Year Name of Owner

Description of Property Use

Property Use

1

Other Observations (Aerial Photographs, Fire Insurance

Plans, Etc.)

1861 Estate of Robert Dickson

Undeveloped Agriculture or

other use

No development noted (Source: Historical Map, City

Archives)

1867 John Goodall Residential Residential Apparent residential house

(Source: Historical Map, City Archives)

13 Sept. 1883

Corporation of the Town

of Galt Residential Residential

Apparent residential house (Source: Title Search, Historical

Map City Archives)

21 March 1907

R.G Struthers

Spice importers and grinders

(O/a Beaver Mfg.)

Industrial (Source: Title Search, City Archives, FIP)

21 March 1907

H.W. Griffin Spice importers

and grinders (O/a Beaver Mfg.)

Industrial (Source: Title Search, City

Archives, FIP, City directories)

12 Oct. 1917

R.G Struthers Spice importers

and grinders (O/a Beaver Mfg.)


Archives, FIP City directories)

26 Dec. 1922

Galt Chemical

Products Ltd.

Manufacturing of soaps, cleaners, livestock supplies


Archives, FIP, City directories)

2007 International Stock Feed Company


Industrial Change of company name (Source: Title Search, City

directories)

2008 Razzle

Holdings Inc.



directories)

2010 Sea of Green

Inc.



directories)

31 March 2010

W.L. Mallan Vacant

(storage only) Industrial

Building used for storage only (Source: Title Search, Site

Inspection, interviews)

20 September

2012

WM & FM Constructions

Inc.

Vacant (storage only)

Industrial Building used for storage only

(Source: Title Search, Site Inspection, interviews)

Notes: 1 - for each owner, specify one of the following types of property use (as defined in O. Reg. 153/04) that applies: Agriculture or other use Commercial use Community use Industrial use Institutional use Parkland use Residential use

PHASE TWO CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL

58 BEVERLY STREET, CAMBRIDGE, ON.

Bluewater Geoscience Consultants Inc. was retained by the current property owner Mr. Bill

Mallan of Wm. & Fm. Constructions Inc. to complete both Phase One and Phase Two

Environmental Site Assessments in support of the filing of a Record of Site Condition for the

property located at 58 Beverly Street in Cambridge, Ontario. The initial Phase One and Phase

Two ESA’s have been supplemented by Phase One and Phase Two ESA Updates. This Phase

Two Conceptual Site Model provides a summary of the findings of these ESA’s and documents

former and current site conditions.

The Phase Two CSM includes and refers to the following drawings:

Figure 1 – Site Location Plan

Figure 2 – Site Plan

Figure 3 – Borehole/Monitoring Well Location Plan

Figure 4 – Cross Section A-A’

Figure 5 – Cross Section B-B’

Figure 6 – Groundwater Flow Plan

Figure 7 – Phase Two Conceptual Site Model #1

Figure 7B – Phase Two Conceptual Site Model #1 – Horizontal Delineation Groundwater

Figure 7C – Phase Two Conceptual Site Model #2 – Vertical Delineation Groundwater

Figure 8 – Phase Two Conceptual Site Model #2

Figure 9 – Site Survey

REM-1 – Remedial Excavation Plan

REM-2 – 2012 Remedial Excavation #1 Detail Plan

REM-3 – 2012 Remedial Excavation #2 Detail Plan

REM-4 – 2008 Soil Brought To RSC Property

The APEC detailed in Section 3.2 of this report (Figure 2) have been investigated, remedial

action taken where necessary, and the only determined remaining exceedance of the generic

Table 2 SCS is trace concentrations of residual chloroform in groundwater. Soil containing PAH

parameters at concentrations in excess of the generic SCS was identified at the location of BH-

4.

The Phase Two property is not located in close proximity to any ANSI, environmentally sensitive

areas, does not contain shallow bedrock (< 2m) or surface water bodies which may apply to the

selection of the applicable SCS. Lab analysis of site soil pH levels confirm that the soil is within

the range of 5 to 9 required by the MOE.

The RSC property is located in an area of predominantly residential land use with some nearby

commercial and institutional uses. The RSC property is currently developed with one main Site

building and an ancillary garage building as shown on Site Plans. The proposed site

redevelopment is to re-purpose the existing former industrial building for residential usage. As

such, no significant earthworks are anticipated during site redevelopment. The redeveloped Site

will be nearly completely covered with hard surfaces (buildings, parking areas etc.) with only the

banks forming the north and east sides of the property not covered. The banks comprise steep

upward slopes to the adjacent properties. Investigations completed during the RSC process

determined that the banks appear to be comprised of native sand to sand and gravel soil.

Sampling and analysis of soil forming these banks was completed during the RSC

investigations and it was determined that the soils meet the Table 2 SCS. Some of the soil

forming the base of the banks has been excavated for backfill of remedial excavations and to

provide the required space for site parking lots.

The Site is legally described as “Plan 615, Part Lot 1, W/S Beverly, N/S Kerr” which is provided

in the Site Survey Plan Figure 9, Appendix A of this report. The complete Parts Schedule is

provided in this Plan of Survey.

Based on information provided in the Regional Municipality of Waterloo’s online GIS Locator

(http://maps.region.waterloo.on.ca/locator/locator.htm), the Municipal Assessment Roll Number

for the Site is 300608000201000; and the Property Identification Number (PIN) for the Site is

038140366.

The geo-referencing coordinates for the approximate centre of the Site are:

Latitude/Longitude: 43˚ 13′ 15″ North, 86˚ 28′ 21″ West

UTM Coordinates: Zone 17 55580E, 4801100N

OBM Topographic Map Sheet Number: 10 17 5550 48000

Areas Where Potentially Contaminating Activities Have Occurred

The areas where PCA and APEC have occurred are shown on Figure 2. A Phase One ESA was

conducted by Bluewater (“Phase One ESA, 58 Beverly Street, Cambridge” dated October 2012)

and a Phase One ESA Update (dated August 2014); which identified several areas of potential

environmental concern in association with historical industrial activities at the Site and within the

Study Area; and related to documented areas of the Site with known or suspected

environmental impacts. Based on the Phase One ESA and Phase One ESA Update completed,

it is Bluewater’s opinion that there are potential environmental concerns at the Site; including

Potentially Contaminating Activities (PCA) and Areas of Potential Environmental Concern

(APEC) associated with historical on-Site operations, and with current and/or historical off-Site

activities in the surrounding area. The findings, observations and conclusions are briefly

summarized below. The PCA/APEC identified during this assessment included the following:

APEC 1 – MOE PCA #28 - Gasoline and Associated Products Storage in Fixed Tanks,

former on-site UST;

APEC 2 - MOE PCA #50 – Soap and Detergent Manufacturing and Bulk Storage;

APEC 3 – MOE PCA #30 - Importation of Fill Materials of unknown quality, prior

remedial excavations;

APEC 4 – MOE PCA #30 - Importation of Fill Materials of unknown quality, on site fill

placement;

APEC 5 - MOE PCA #28 - Gasoline and Associated Products Storage in Fixed Tanks,

related to off-site gas station;

APEC 6 – Non-MOE PCA - On-site presence of chloroform impacted groundwater

associated with leakage from the municipal water distribution system.

Physical Setting of the Phase Two Property

The subject property is located on the northeast corner of the intersection of Kerr Street and

Beverly Street in Cambridge, Ontario. Beverly Street runs along the south side (inferred) of the

property and Kerr Street forms the west side Site boundary. The terrain of the Site is relatively

flat, with a slight slope to the southwest. The north and east boundaries of the Site have steep,

upward slopes to adjacent properties. Surface water drainage is overland towards Beverly

Street where storm water sewers are located.

The flat portions of the property are at a geodetic elevation of ~272.4 m amsl. A two-storey

former light industrial building is located along the west side of the Site adjacent Kerr Street. A

one-storey garage building is located near the southeast corner of the Site. These buildings are

to remain on site after redevelopment. No additional buildings are proposed. The main, central

portion of the Site is used for parking. There are no surface water bodies or ANSI located within

the Phase I study area.

Site Stratigraphy

Site Stratigraphy was determined to consist of sand and gravel soil with some cobbles and

boulders from ground surface to 3.1 m below grade (~269.5 m asl). This unit was dry and

although found to consist mainly of coarse-grained particles, is considered to be an aquitard.

Areas of fill brought to the RSC property are present within this upper stratigraphic unit at

locations shown on the attached figures. No fill was brought to the RSC property during this

investigation however fill was placed during previous work. The previously-imported fill was

sampled and analyzed during the RSC process and determined to meet the Table 2 SCS and is

therefore considered appropriate to stay on the property.

Below the sand and gravel unit and extending to a depth of ~6.1 m (~266.5 m asl) below grade

is Silt Till. This unit is described as sandy with some clay, gravel and trace cobbles. This soil

unit is also dry and is an aquitard. Below the Silt Till beginning at a depth of 6.1 m below grade

is limestone bedrock. The bedrock was found to extend to the maximum depth investigated of

14.9 m below grade (~257.4 m asl).

A total of fifteen (15) boreholes were advanced on the subject property to assess soil and

groundwater conditions. Nine of the boreholes were developed as groundwater monitoring

wells. Soil and groundwater samples from each borehole/monitoring well were obtained and

analyzed for the VOC, PHC, PAH and Heavy Metals parameters.

Hydrogeological Characteristics

Groundwater was encountered within the bedrock unit at depths of ~6.1 m (~266.5 m asl) below

grade on the Phase Two property. The limestone is weathered and fractured and was found to

contain groundwater at depths of ~6.7 m below grade (~265.9 m asl). At deeper levels within

the bedrock aquifer, groundwater levels were determined to be at ~9 m below grade (~263.2 m

asl). Groundwater was determined to flow towards the south to southwest. The hydraulic

gradient of the limestone bedrock aquifer was determined to be 0.011. Groundwater level

monitoring completed on three occasions between September 2012 and July 2013 indicate very

minor fluctuations (<0.16 m). Based on the derived groundwater level information, groundwater

does not appear to rise to levels of less than 6 m below grade at the RSC property. This

information correlates well with information available for other water wells in the RSC study

area. Climatic or Meteorological conditions do not appear to significantly affect contaminant

concentration, distribution or migration. An downward vertical hydraulic gradient of 0.414 was

determined for the bedrock aquifer.

Groundwater sampling and lab analysis completed during this Phase Two ESA determined the

apparent site-wide presence of chloroform in the upper portions of the bedrock aquifer.

Chloroform concentrations of 2.6 – 6.4 ug/L were determined, above the generic SCS of 2.4

ug/L. The vertical distribution of elevated chloroform indicates that the impacted zone extends

from ~6.1 m below grade (266.5 m asl) to a maximum of 13 m below grade (~259.5 m asl). It

would appear this condition is site wide (and possibly area-wide). Past reports document a

major water main break adjacent to the RSC property in 2007 during which time as much as 3

million litres of municipally-treated water was released to the subsurface. Further, the RSC

property is located in an older area of Cambridge with aged water infrastructure and other

leaks/releases may be present from the municipal system. The determined chloroform

concentrations in the bedrock aquifer are consistent with, to less than, chloroform

concentrations reported for the municipal potable water system by the City of Cambridge. The

property owner has reviewed the water bills related to the RSC site and determined that water

leakage from the private section of the site water service is not occurring. There is potential for

excess chloroform groundwater concentrations to produce vapour intrusion into site buildings

via the groundwater to indoor air pathway. Potential receptors would include building occupants.

All subsurface structures and utilities are located well above the groundwater levels and are

therefore unlikely to affect contaminant distribution or migration.

Approximate Depth to Bedrock

Groundwater was encountered within the bedrock unit at depths of ~6.1 m below grade on the

Phase Two property. This would indicate an top of bedrock elevation of ~266.4 m asl.

Approximate Depth to the Water Table

The limestone is weathered and fractured and was found to contain groundwater at depths of

~6.7 m below grade (~265.9 m asl).

Any respect in which Section 41 or 43.1 of the Regulation Apply to the Property

There are no portions of the site to which Sections 41 or 43 apply.

Areas Where Soil has Been Brought from Another Property and Placed On, In or Under

the Phase Two Property

Soil was brought to the RSC property during the 2008-2009 remedial work and subsequent

RSC filing. At that time, analysis of imported soil was not required to support the filing of an

RSC with MOE. The imported soil was documented to consist of processed fill soil from a

licensed sand and gravel pit. During the completion of the current Phase Two ESA, extensive

analysis of this previously-imported fill was completed and no environmental concerns were

identified. No fill was imported during the current assessment. The areas of the site where past

remedial excavations have been backfilled are shown on Figure 2.

Approximate Locations of Any Proposed Buildings

The existing site building is intended for re-use for multi-tenant residential use. The building is

heated utilizing an updated forced-air, natural gas furnace. The building also has air

conditioning controlled from an updated AC unit located on the third floor of the building.

Contaminants Present at Concentrations Greater than the Applicable SCS

At the location of BH-4 on the property fill soil containing PAH parameters (benzo(a)anthracene,

benzo(a)pyrene, dibenzo(ah)anthracene, fluoranthene and indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene) were

detected at concentrations in excess of the Table 2 SCS. This PAH-impacted soil was

determined in SS-3 located 2.25 – 2.85 m below grade. This is an open area of the site where

fill soils have been placed. Broad delineation of the PAH impacts are provided by sampling and

analysis of soil samples from BH/MW’s 1, 2 and 3. The slopes adjacent to BH-4 consist of

native sand and gravel, precluding the potential presence of fill placement. It is believed the fill

was placed as part of initial site grading however it is unclear the source of the impacted fill soil.

It is unlikely that climatic or meteorological conditions will affect the distribution or migration of

the PAH-impacted fill soil.

Groundwater chloroform concentrations in excess of the Table 2 SCS of 2.4 ug/L were

documented at all shallow monitoring well locations. The chloroform impacted shallow

groundwater zone was determined to extend from 6.7 to 13 m below grade. Potential receptors

could include building occupants. Exposure pathway would be via groundwater to indoor air.

Assumptions made in the derivation of the Generic Table 2 Standards may not apply to the RSC

property. Based on this, a MGRA was completed to determine whether the low 2.4 ug/L SCS

may be modified based on site conditions.

Areas Where Contaminants are Present Above the Table 2 SCS

Figures REM-1 – REM-4 show the complete horizontal and vertical distribution of PAH-impacted

fill soil at the site as determined during the site remediation. All PAH-impacted soil was

excavated and disposed off-site during the remediation process. Confirmatory soil sampling was

completed to prove that all impacted soil has been removed.

The chloroform-impacted groundwater was determined to have a horizontal extent which covers

the entire site. It is likely an area wide issue given the volume of leakage that occurs from the

City of Cambridge water distribution system and the volume of water released during the 2007

water main break adjacent to the property. The chloroform impacted shallow groundwater zone

was determined to extend from 6.7 to 13 m below grade.

The Contaminants Associated with each of these Areas and the Medium Affected

The PAH-impacted, surficial fill soil contained concentrations of (benzo(a)anthracene,

benzo(a)pyrene, dibenzo(ah)anthracene, fluoranthene and indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene) in excess of

the Table 2 SCS. All PAH-impacted soil was removed from the Phase Two property.

Groundwater was found to be impacted with chloroform at concentrations in excess of the

Generic Table 2 SCS for coarse-textured soils.

Description and Assessment of Impacted Area and Contaminant Distribution

The PAH-impacted soil area consists of a portion of the current parking area on the west side of

the property. The depth of impact was determined to be from surface to 2.4 m below grade in

that area. This area lies on the periphery of past remedial excavations.

The chloroform groundwater impacts were determined to have a site-wide horizontal extent. The

vertical distribution of chloroform concentrations completed indicates that levels drop with depth

in the bedrock aquifer. This is consistent with chloroform additions to the bedrock from near-

surface leak sources.

Reasons for Discharge of the Contaminants

The PAH-impacted fill soil is likely the result of the on-site placement of fill of low quality during

initial site development. The chloroform-impacted groundwater is the result of leakage from the

City of Cambridge municipal water distribution system. The City of Cambridge website indicates

that upwards of 25% of treated water entering the City’s system is lost through leaks in the

system.

Potential for Migration of Contaminants

Migration of impacted soil is unlikely to occur. Migration of impacted groundwater is likely to

occur however given the scope of the chloroform issue, it will not affect the site characterization.

Influence of Climatic or Meteorological Conditions

Climatic or meteorological conditions are highly unlikely to influence contaminant distribution or

migration.

Potential for Soil Vapour Intrusion

The chloroform in groundwater creates the potential for vapour intrusion into on-site buildings.

The fact that the groundwater is contained within the bedrock at depths greater than 6 m below

grade, and that upward vapour migration is inhibited by the presence of a 3.1 m thick, very

dense Silt Till layer above the bedrock, indicates that the Generic Table 2 SCS for chloroform

may not accurately reflect site conditions.

Release Mechanisms

The PAH-impacted fill soil is likely the result of the on-site placement of fill of low quality during

initial site development. The chloroform-impacted groundwater is the result of leakage from the

City of Cambridge municipal water distribution system. The City of Cambridge website indicates

that upwards of 25% of treated water entering the City’s system is lost through leaks in the

system.

Contaminant Transport Pathways

PAH-impacted fill soil may be transported while the soil is disturbed through excavating etc. It

may further be taken up by roots of vegetation, or ingested/inhaled and by dermal contact by

animals.

Potential receptors for PAH soil impacts include human or animal exposure through direct

contact, ingestion and inhalation. The PAH impacts are unlikely to create impact to groundwater

due to their lower solubility and the distance to groundwater. The groundwater is further

protected from potential impact from the surficial PAH impacts by the presence of the silt till

layer which would preclude/reduce direct infiltration from surface to the bedrock aquifer.

Potential exposure to plants may be present through root uptake. The area where PAH soil

impacts are present is proposed to be a parking area with asphalt cover.

Contaminant transport pathways for chloroform impacted groundwater include dispersion with

normal groundwater flow and the migration of vapours within the bedrock and soil column.

Human and Ecological Receptors

Both human and ecological receptors may be present on the RSC property. The potential for

these receptors to come into contact with PAH-impacted shallow soil existed before the

remedial work completed on the RSC property but since all this soil has been removed from the

site, this potential exposure has been removed.

Both human and ecological receptors may be affected by the presence of chloroform-impacted

groundwater beneath the RSC property. It has been determined that the assumptions made

during derivation of the Generic Table 2 Standards do not accurately reflect site conditions and

that the Site Specific groundwater chloroform Standard is met on the site.

Receptor Exposure Points and Routes of Exposure

Given that all potential exposure pathways have been closed exposure points and rotes of

exposure no longer exist on the RSC property.

Base Plan from RMOW GIS Locator

Date: Dwn By: Chkd. By: Scale

26/10/2012 WL BJL 1:2 000

Location Plan

Phase Two ESA 58 Beverly Street

Cambridge, Ontario

Project No. BG-442 Figure 1


42 Shadyridge Place

Kitchener, Ontario

N2N 3J1

Ph: (519) 744-4123

Fax: (519) 744-1863

Subject Site

BLUEWATERGEOSCIENCE CONSULTANTS Inc.

DATE: SCALE:

PROJECT NO: FIGURE NO.

DESIGNED BY:

DRAWN BY: APPROVED BY:

WM & FM CONSTRUCTION

PHASE TWO ESA - SITE PLAN

58 BEVERLY STREET, CAMBRIDGE

2

BG-442

1 : 200

-

OCT. 20/14

CF

B.L.

SITE NORTHTRUE NORTH

A

A'

B'

B


DATE: SCALE:


DESIGNED BY:



PHASE TWO ESA - BOREHOLE/MONITORING

WELL LOCATION PLAN


3

BG-442

1 : 200

-

SEPT. 25/13

CF

B.L.


A A'


DATE: SCALE:


DESIGNED BY:



PHASE TWO ESA - CROSS SECTION A - A'


4

BG-442

AS SHOWN

-

SEPT. 26/13

CF

B.L.

06 3 6 Metres

03 1.5 3 Metres

TRUE NORTH

B B'


DATE: SCALE:


DESIGNED BY:



PHASE TWO ESA - CROSS SECTION B - B'


5

BG-442

AS SHOWN

-

SEPT. 26/13

CF

B.L.

06 3 6 Metres

03 1.5 3 Metres

TRUE NORTH


DATE: SCALE:


DESIGNED BY:



PHASE TWO ESA - GROUNDWATER FLOW

PATTERN


6

BG-442

1 : 200

-

SEPT. 26/13

CF

B.L.



DATE: SCALE:


DESIGNED BY:



PHASE TWO ESA -

CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL #1


7

BG-442

1 : 200

-

OCT. 16/13

CF

B.L.



DATE: SCALE:


DESIGNED BY:



PHASE TWO ESA -



7

BG-442

1 : 200

-

OCT. 16/13

CF

B.L.


A A'


DATE: SCALE:


DESIGNED BY:



PHASE TWO ESA -



7C

BG-442

AS SHOWN

-

AUG. 25/14

JR

B.L.

06 3 6 Metres

01.5 0.75 1.5 Metres

A A'


DATE: SCALE:


DESIGNED BY:



PHASE TWO ESA -



8

BG-442

AS SHOWN

-

OCT. 16/13

CF

B.L.

06 3 6 Metres

03 1.5 3 Metres

TRUE NORTH

GEOSCIENCE CONSULTANTS Inc.

DATE: SCALE:


DESIGNED BY:



PHASE TWO ESA - REMEDIAL

EXCAVATION PLAN


REM-1

BG-442

1 : 200

-

SEPT. 26/13

CF

-



DATE: SCALE:


DESIGNED BY:



PHASE TWO ESA - 2012 REMEDIAL

EXCAVATION #1 DETAIL PLAN


REM-2

BG-442

AS SHOWN

-

SEPT. 26/13

CF

-


06 3 6 Metres

03 1.5 3 Metres


DATE: SCALE:


DESIGNED BY:



PHASE TWO ESA - 2012 REMEDIAL

EXCAVATION #2 DETAIL PLAN


REM-3

BG-442

AS SHOWN

-

SEPT. 26/13

CF

-


06 3 6 Metres

03 1.5 3 Metres


DATE: SCALE:


DESIGNED BY:



PHASE TWO ESA - 2008 SOIL BROUGHT

TO RSC PROPERTY


REM-4

BG-442

1 : 200

-

SEPT. 24/13

CF

-
