Upload
trannga
View
213
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
One Day Seminar on IND AS
WICASA Student Event
Overview & Issues in Ind-AS Roadmap
Pankaj Tiwari
CNK & Associates LLP
October 6, 2017
Background & Overview of IGAAP
& IFRS
Accounting Standards in India
� Till 2006, Standards issued by ASB of ICAI were to be followed
� Companies (Accounting Standards) Rules, notified in Dec 2006
for companies [under sec 211(3C) of Companies Act 1956]
� Sec 133 of Companies Act, 2013 and Rule 7 of the Companies
(Accounts) Rules, 2014 have also notified the same AS
� Under Sec 133 of the 2013 Act, National Financial Reporting
Authority (NFRA) is to issue AS (will replace NACAS)
� AS 1 to AS 29 (except AS 8) (as amended) notified so far
� ICAI has also issued AS 30, 31, 32, but not notified by NACAS
What is I-GAAP ?
I-GAAP refers to:
� Notified Standards u/s 133
� Clarifications by ICAI / MCA for accounting standards
� AS issued by ICAI
� Statements / Guidance Notes issued by ICAI
� Announcements by ICAI on topical matters (AG, FAQs,
Council announcements, etc.)
Changes in AS pursuant to notification of Ind AS
• MCA has issued a ‘upgraded’ set of AS: These will be
nearer to Ind AS
• Applicable for entities having net worth < 250 crores
• Several concessions/exemptions proposed in ‘upgraded’ set of
AS
• Certain difficult concepts to be omitted from the ‘upgraded’ AS
(e.g. fair value, derivative accounting., etc.)
• Companies (AS) Amendment Rules, 2016 notified on 30th
March 2016 (effective 1st April 2016 or 2016-17 onwards)
• 7 standards replaced – AS 2, 4, 10, 13, 14, 21, 29
• AS 6 omitted
Amendments to Accounting Standards
Name of the
Standard
Key Revision
AS 2 Valuation of
Inventories
Aligned spare parts accounting with
AS 10
AS 4 Contingencies
and events after the
Balance Sheet date
Dividend declared after Balance Sheet
date, but before the financial
statements are approved for issue
would be non adjusting item
AS 6 Depreciation
Accounting
Requirements for depreciation are
now incorporated in revised AS 10
Amendments to Accounting Standards
Name of the
Standard
Key Revision
AS 10 Property, Plant
& Equipment's
Cost of an item of property, plant and
equipment would be cash price equivalent
at that date
Component accounting mandatory (also
mandated by Schedule II of Companies
Act 2013)
Depreciation method to be required to be
reviewed at least at each financial year
end
Clarity on spare parts accounting –
definitions and recognition principles
would be applicable to spare parts
accounting
Decommissioning liability on a discounted
basis
Amendments to Accounting Standards
Name of the Standard Key Revision
AS 13 Accounting of
Investments
Investment property to be accounted
for in accordance with cost model as
prescribed in revised AS 10
AS 14 Accounting for
Amalgamations
Limited Revision to include
reference to 2013 Act in the
standard
AS 21 Consolidated
Financial Statements
A company without a subsidiary but
with associates and JV to prepare
CFS
AS 29 Provisions,
Contingent Liabilities and
Contingent Assets
Decommissioning liability provision
would be on discounted basis
Companies(Indian Accounting
Standards) Rules
Implementation Roadmap (Past and Future):
• Year 2007:• Concept paper issued by ICAI proposing India to "Converge" with IFRS
rather than "adopting" IFRS
• Year 2009:• At G-20 summit PM committing to converge with IFRS by April 2011
• Year 2010:• January 2010 MCA issued a roadmap for implementation of Ind-AS
• December 2010 process of convergence completed
• Year 2014:• 9 April 2014 ICAI proposed a new road map for implementation of Ind-
AS
• 10 July 2014 FM announced a roadmap to make Ind-AS mandatory
from FY 2016-17 and voluntary from FY 2015-16
Implementation Roadmap (Past and Future):
• Year 2015:• 2 January 2015- MCA issued a revised roadmap for implementation of
Ind-AS
• January 2015- ED on Ind-AS compliant Schedule III to the Companies
Act,2013
• 16 February 2015- MCA issued Companies (Indian Accounting
Standard) Rules,2015 notifying 39 Ind AS
• July 2015- government set up a committee to assess the impact of
minimum alternate tax (MAT) on companies under Ind-AS
• September 2015- NACAS asked the government to postpone
implementation of Ind-AS 115- Revenue recognition standard
• 29 September 2015-Fourth Bi-monthly Monetary Policy Statement-
Banks and NBFC to implement from 2018-19 onwards12
Implementation Roadmap (Past and Future):
• Year 2016:• 18 January 2016-MCA announced roadmap for implementation of Ind
AS for SCB’s, Insurance companies and NBFCs
• 11 February 2016- RBI issues a circular requiring SCBs to comply
with Ind AS in phases from accounting period beginning 1 April 2018
• 1 March 2016- IRDA issued a circular for Ind AS implementation for
all insurers in phases from accounting periods beginning 1 April 2018
• 30 March 2016- MCA notifies a roadmap for implementation of Ind AS
by NBFCs in phases from accounting period beginning 1 April 2018
• 30 March 2016- MCA issued Companies (Indian Accounting
Standard) Rules,2016- replaced Ind AS 115 with Ind AS 18 and
Ind AS 11
Implementation of Ind AS-Current Status
� Notification dated 16 February 2015:� Companies (Indian Accounting Standards) Rules, 2015
� 39 Ind AS notified effective from 1st April, 2015
� Rule 4 states: ‘ The Companies and their auditors shall comply with
the Indian Accounting Standards (Ind AS)…’
� Notification dates 30th March 2016:� Companies (Indian Accounting Standards)(Amendment) Rules, 2016
� Gives roadmap for Banks and NBFCs for Ind AS implementation
� Ind AS 115 omitted – Ind AS 11 and Ind AS 18 notified
� Several other Ind AS amended
� Total Ind AS now applicable: 40
• Notification dated 6th April 2016:� Schedule III of Companies Act 2013 amended to prescribe format for
Ind AS financial statements
Implementation Roadmap : Corporate road map
Phase I Phase II Voluntary
adoption
Year of adoption FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2015-16
Comparative
Year
FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2014-15
Covered Companies
(a) Listed Co’s Net worth >=
500 Cr.
All listed & in
process of listing
(b) Unlisted Co’s Net worth >=
500 Cr.
Companies net
worth >= 250 cr.
( C) Group Co’s Applicable to holding, subsidiaries,
joint ventures, or associates of
companies covered in (a) and (b)
above.
Exceptions: Insurance companies, banking companies, Non-banking
finance companies (NBFC) and Co’s listed on SME’s exchanges
15
Implementation Roadmap : Banking and NBFCs
Banking
Companies
NBFCs - Phase I NBFCs - Phase II
Year of adoption FY 2018-19 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20
Comparative
Year
FY 2017-18 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19
Entities Covered Scheduled
commercial
banks & Exim
Bank/NABARD
/NHB/ SIDBI &
insurers
All NBFCs
having net worth
>=
INR 500 crore
All listed & in
process of listing
Other NBFCs net
worth >= 250 cr.
but < 500 cr.
Group
Companies
Holding,
subsidiaries,
joint ventures
or
associates of
banks
Applicable to holding, subsidiaries,
joint ventures, or associates of
companies
covered above, other than those
covered under the corporate road
map
Group companies of Banks to follow Banking Road map16
Companies (Indian Accounting Standards) Rules
• Companies (IAS) Rules 2015:• Rule 1- Title and commencement
• Rule 2- Definitions
• Rule 3- Applicability of Accounting Standard
• Rule 4- Obligation to comply with Ind AS
• (1) Companies & their auditors comply with Ind AS specified in
Annexure
• (2) Calculation of Net worth
• (3) Apply to Stand-alone and consolidated financial statement
• (4) Prepare first set of financial statement in accordance with Ind AS
• (5) Overseas subsidiary, associates, JV –prepare stand-alone in
accordance with specific jurisdiction
• (6) Indian company (S, A, JV of Foreign Company) prepare its FS on
the basis of criteria
• (7) Apply Ind AS consistently
• (8) & (9) No Roll back- even if criteria does not apply
• Rule 5- Exemption
Adobe Acrobat
Document
Companies (Indian Accounting Standards) Rules
• Companies (IAS) Rules 2016:• Rule 1- Title and commencement- changed to 2016
• Rule 2- Definitions- “Non-Banking Financial Company”
means…………….
• Rule 3- No change
• Rule 4-
• (1)…………..
• Voluntary adoption- including H, S, JV & AE
• Compliance related to NBFC- along with roadmap in (a) and (b)
• (2) …………….
• Net worth computation for NBFC
Adobe Acrobat
Document
Issues in the implementation
roadmap
Summary of issues discussed in ITFG Bulletin :
ITFG Bulletin Issues in
implementation
road map
Other issues Total
Bulletin-1 2 4 6
Bulletin-2 1 6 7
Bulletin-3 6 8 14
Bulletin-4 1 3 4
Bulletin-5 1 7 8
Bulletin-6 4 0 4
Bulletin-7 0 9 9
Bulletin-8 0 9 9
Bulletin-9 0 3 3
Bulletin-10 0 6 6
Bulletin-11 1 8 9
Total 16 63 79
Issue-1:
• Facts of Case:
• Company X, on standalone basis, had a net worth of above INR 250
crore but below INR 500 crore in financial year 2013-14 as well as
financial year 2014-15 and is expected to exceed INR 500 crore in
financial year 2015-16.
• Issue for discussion:
• Whether the Company X be required to comply with Ind AS from
financial year 2017-18 i.e. under Phase II, given that the net worth as
on 31st March 2014 was below INR 500 Crore and the Company X
was a company existing as on 31st March 2014 and was already
falling under the threshold as on 31st March 2014 itself irrespective
of the fact that the net-worth as on 31st March 2016 might be above
INR 500 crore.
Issue-2:
• Facts of Case:
• Company A is a listed company and has three Subsidiaries Company
X, Company Y and Company Z. As on 31st March 2014, the net worth
of Company A is INR 600 Crores, net worth of Company X is INR 100
Crores, Company Y is INR 400 Crores and Company Z is Rs 210
Crores. All the three subsidiaries are non-listed public companies.
• Issue for discussion:
• Case A- During the financial year 2014-15, Company A has sold off
its entire investment in Company X on 31st December 2014.
Therefore, Company X is no longer a subsidiary of Company A for the
purposes of preparation of financial statements as on 31 March 2015.
• Should Company X prepare its financial statements as per the
Companies (Accounting Standards) Rules, 2006 or the Companies
(Indian Accounting Standards) Rules, 2015?
Issue-2:
• Issue for discussion:
• Case B- During the financial year 2015-16, Company A has sold off
its investment in Company Y on 31st December, 2015. Therefore,
Company Y is no longer a subsidiary of Company A for the purposes
of preparation of financial statements as on 31 March 2016.
• Should Company Y prepare its financial statements as per the
Companies (Accounting Standards) Rules, 2006 or the Companies
(Indian Accounting Standards) Rules, 2015?
• Issue for discussion:
• Case C- During the financial year 2016-17, Company A has sold off
its investment in Company Z on 31st December 2016, therefore
company Z is no longer a subsidiary of Company A for the purposes of
preparation of financial statements as on 31 March 2017.
• Should Company Z prepare its financial statements as per the
Companies (Accounting Standards) Rules, 2006 or the Companies
(Indian Accounting Standards) Rules, 2015?
Issue-3:
• Facts of Case:
• Company X Ltd. and Company Y Ltd. registered in India having net
worth of INR 600 crores and 100 crores respectively are subsidiaries
of a Foreign Company viz., ABC Inc., which has net worth of more
than INR 500 crores in financial year 2015-16.
• Issue for discussion:
• Whether Company X Ltd. and Y Ltd. are required to comply with Ind
AS from financial year 2016-17 on the basis of net worth of the parent
Foreign Company or on the basis of their own net worth?
Issue-4:
• Facts of Case:
• Company A is a Core Investment Company (CIC) having net worth of
more than 500 crore as on March 31, 2014. During the year 2014-15,
the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) had exempted Company A from
certain regulations/directions governing CIC in India.
• Issue for discussion:
• Whether Company A (exempted CIC) will be regarded as Non-Banking
Financial Company (NBFC) for the purpose of applicability of Ind AS?
Issue-5:
• Facts of Case:
• Company B Ltd. is an associate company of Company A Ltd.
Company X Ltd. is the holding company of Company A Ltd. Company
X Ltd. has decided to adopt Ind AS voluntarily from 2015-16.
• Issue for discussion:
• Whether Company A Ltd. and Company B Ltd. are statutorily required
to comply with Ind AS from financial year 2015-16?
Issue-6:
• Facts of Case:
• Company X, on a standalone basis, has a net worth of above INR 500
crore and hence required to comply with Ind AS from financial year
2016-17. Company Y (listed entity), on a standalone basis, has net
worth of above INR 250 crore but below INR 500 crore and therefore
required to comply with Ind AS from financial year 2017-18.
• Company X acquires shares of Company Y resulting in Company Y
becoming an associate of Company X on October 31, 2016, but before
approval of the results for the quarter ended September 2016.
• Issue for discussion:
• Whether Company Y will be required to comply with Ind AS from
financial year 2016-17 or it will comply from financial year 2017-18?
If the response is that compliance is from the financial year 2016-17,
would the financial results of Company Y for the quarter ended
September 30, 2016 be prepared in accordance with Ind AS?
Issue-7:
• Facts of Case:
• Company X (Listed entity) has a net worth of above INR 500 crore and
hence required to comply with Ind AS from financial year 2016-17.
Company Y (Unlisted entity), on a standalone basis, has net worth
below INR 250 crore and hence it is not required to comply with Ind
AS. Company Y acquires shares of Company X during financial year
2016-17, whereby Company Y becomes the holding company of
Company X.
• Issue for discussion:
• Whether Company Y will be required to comply with Ind AS from
financial year 2016-17, given that it has now become a holding
company of Company X during FY 2016-17?
Issue-8:
• Facts of Case:
• As on March 31, 2014, Company A is a listed company and has a net
worth of 50 crore. As on March 31, 2015, the company is no more a
listed company.
• Issue for discussion:
• Whether Company A is required to comply with Ind AS from financial
year 2017-18.
Issue-9:
• Facts of Case:
• ABC Ltd. is a listed company. The net worth of ABC Ltd. as on 31st
March 2014 was INR 200 crores. ABC Ltd. had a subsidiary, namely,
XYZ Ltd. as at 31st March, 2015 whose net worth, consisting only of
share capital as at that date, was INR 600 crores. XYZ Ltd. was
incorporated in January, 2015. It was incorporated only for the
purposes of its divestment. The financial statements of XYZ Ltd. were
not consolidated with that of ABC Ltd. as at 31st March, 2015 in view
of requirements of paragraph 11 of Accounting Standard (AS) 21,
Consolidated Financial Statements. ABC Ltd. entered into agreement
with a proposed acquirer of the subsidiary, i.e., PQR Ltd., in
September, 2015. The entire ownership of XYZ Ltd. was finally
transferred to the said acquirer in the first fortnight of April, 2016
• Issue for discussion:
• In the given case, whether the ABC Ltd. is required to comply with Ind
AS from the financial year 2016-17?
Issues……………..
• Issue-10:• ABC Ltd., a non-listed company is not covered under Ind-AS
applicability criteria. It desires to apply Ind-AS voluntarily for CFS
purposes. To avoid tax and revenue sharing issues, it will continue
preparing the SFS as per AS-2006.
• Is this an acceptable view?
• Issue-11:• An Indian company is not covered under Ind AS applicability criteria.
The company is not interested in applying Ind AS in entirety. However
it wants to apply certain Ind AS on voluntary basis. For example, it
wants to apply Ind AS 109 Financial Instruments which will allow it
to fair value its investments. For other matters, the company will
continue applying AS-2006. Is it permissible?
Issue-12:
Parent Limited
A Ltd. B Ltd. (FS)C Ltd. (A of
P)
D Ltd. (Sub)E Ltd.
(A/JV)
F Ltd. (Subs
of B Ltd.)
Issues……………
• Issue-12:• In the above structure, only A Ltd. meets the listing/net worth criteria
prescribed for applicability of Ind-AS. No other company fulfil either of
the two criteria. Which companies in the diagram are mandatorily
required to follows Ind AS?
• Issue-13:• ABC Pvt. Ltd., a private limited company, has 3 subsidiaries, neither
the company or any of the subsidiaries are not covered under Ind AS
applicability criteria. From 1 April 2016 ABC Pvt. Ltd. decides to apply
Ind AS on voluntary basis , decides to apply Ind AS on voluntary
basis. Whether the 3 subsidiaries of the company are also need to
adopt the Ind AS from 1 April 2016?
Microsoft Word
Document
Issues:
• Issue-14:• ABC Limited, a listed company, which historically used calendar year
(i.e. 12 month period ending 31 December) as its financial year. To
comply with the Companies Act,2013 requirement concerning the
uniform financial year, the company is preparing the financial
statement for 15 months period from 1 January 2015 to 31 March
2016. Can the company adopt Ind AS on voluntary basis in its
financial statement for 15 months period ended 31 March 2016?
• Issue-15:• XYZ Limited is a non-listed company having net worth of more than
INR 500 cr. Accordingly, it started applying Ind-AS from financial year
beginning 1 April 2016. However, in the year 2019, due to continuous
losses and significant business restructurings, its net worth
decreased to INR 200 cr. Is XYZ Ltd. still required to apply Ind AS?
Can it choose to revert to Indian GAAP?
Issues:
• Issue-16:• LT Finance Ltd., is a NBFC and subsidiary of LT Ltd., a company
covered in mandatory phase 1 of Ind AS adoption. Whether LT
Finance Ltd., being subsidiary of a covered company, also required to
adopt Ind-As from the same date? Alternatively, can the NBFC adopt
Ind-AS for its statutory financial statement on voluntary basis?
• What if LT Finance Ltd. is holding company of 4 subsidiaries covered
under phase-1 of Ind AS adoption?
• Issue-17:• PS Ltd. is a company not listed in any stock exchange in India but is
listed in stock exchange outside India, will Ind AS apply to PS Ltd.
What if only debt are listed on such stock exchange, will it still need
to adopt Ind AS?
Key area of changes in Ind AS
vs. AS
Key area of changes:
37
Topic IGAAP (AS-1) IND-AS (Ind-AS-1)
Presentation of
Financial Statements-
reclassification
One line stating that
previous year figures
are reclassified to
confirm to the
presentation in the
current period.
When comparatives
amounts are
reclassified, nature,
amount and reason for
reclassifications need
to be disclosed.
Presentation of
Financial Statements-
extraordinary items
Disclosed as separate
line item in the
Statement of P & L
Presentation of any
items of income or
expense as extra
ordinary item is
prohibited.
Presentation of
Financial Statements-
definition of
“material”
Material= knowledge of
which can influence
the decision of the user
of FS
Omission or
misstatement can be
material if individually
or collectively influence
the decision of user.
Key area of changes:
38
Topic IGAAP IND-AS
Inventories-deferred
settlement scheme
AS-2 v/s IND AS-2
No separate guidance
provided in the
accounting standard
Difference between the
purchase price of
inventories for normal
credit terms and
amount paid for
deferred credit terms is
recognized as
expenses.
Events after the
reporting period-
dividends
AS-4 v/s IND AS-10
AS-4 override Schedule
III and hence provision
require to be created in
the books
Non-adjusting event
and to be recognized as
liability in the period in
which it is declared.
Key area of changes:
39
Topic IGAAP (AS-22) IND-AS (IND-AS-12)
Income Tax- deferred
income tax
Computed for timing
differences in respect of
items of Profit or loss
i.e. P & L as well as
Balance Sheet method
Computed for
temporary differences
between carrying
amount of assets &
liabilities i.e. Only
Balance sheet method
Income Tax- deferred
tax on unrealized
intra group profits
Deferred tax liability is
aggregation from SFS
of each entity
Deferred tax on
unrealized intra-group
profit is recognized at
the buyer’s rate
Income Tax-
disclosures
No disclosures except
few like component of
timing differences
Disclosures like tax
rate reconciliations,
details of tax holiday’s
and expiry,
unrecognized DTL on
undistributed earnings
of subsidiary etc.
Unused tax losses & Unused tax credits: (Para 34 to Para 37)
� DTA is recognised for unused losses and ununsed tax credits to the
extent it is probable that future taxable profit will be available against
which the unused tax losses and unused tax credits can be utilised.
� Probable- not defined in Ind AS 12, factors to consider:
� Existence of sufficient taxable temporary differences
� Taxable profit before UTL or UTC expires
� Identified causes unlikely to recur
� Re-assess the unrecognised DTA on each reporting date
� Requirement under Ind AS 12 relaxed but not become easy ("Virtual
Certainity")
� Situation where DTA under Ind AS 12 but not under AS-22
Case Studies:
CS-1:
• A newly set-up entity (New Co.) incurred significant losses in the first
three years of operations due to reasons such as advertising and initial
set-up related costs, significant borrowing costs and lower level of
activity in the first two years of operations. Over the years, there has
been a significant increase in the operations of New Co. and its
advertisement cost has stabilised to a normal level.
• Further, it has raised new capital during the year and repaid its major
borrowing. The cumulative effect of all the events is that the New Co.
has started earning profits from the fourth year. It is expected to make
substantial profits in the next three years that may absorb the entire
accumulated tax loss of the entity. However, the nature of the business
is such that it does not have any binding orders. What will be your
opinion in light of Ind AS-12?
Case Studies:
CS-2:
• A battery manufacturer (Battery Co.), who had incurred tax losses in
the past, enters into an exclusive sales agreement with a car
manufacturer (Car Co.). According to the agreement, all the cars
manufactured by Car Co. will only use batteries manufactured by
Battery Co. Though Car Co. has not guaranteed any minimum off-take,
there is significant demand for its cars in the market
Key area of changes:
43
Topic IGAAP (AS-10 & AS-6) IND-AS (IND-AS-16)
PPE- Cost of
dismantling etc.
No such specific
requirement
Initial estimate of such
cost need to be
included in the cost of
respective PPE.
PPE- Change in
Method of
depreciation
Require retrospective
computation of
depreciation and such
change is change in
accounting policy
Change in method of
depreciation is
considered as change
in accounting estimate
and are applied
prospectively.
PPE- reassessment of
useful life, residual
value and
depreciation method
No such specific
requirement
RV- review at least at
each year end
UL & Dep. Method -
annual assessment
Key area of changes:
44
Topic IGAAP IND-AS
Leases- Operating
lease rental
recognition
AS-19 v/s Ind AS-17
Lease payments are
recognized on straight
line basis
No straight lining as
per IND AS
Related party
disclosure-KMP
AS-18 v/s Ind AS-24
Compensation to KMP
is disclosed in total as
an aggregate
Compensation need to
be bifurcated into
various component
such as short term
benefit, long term
benefit etc.
Provision & CL-
Contingent assets
AS-29 v/s Ind AS-37
Neither recognized nor
disclosed in the FS
Not recognized but
disclosed in the FS
when an inflow of
economic benefit is
probable.
Key area of changes: IND AS-115 Revenue
Recognition
• Few questions?• Why India was among the first few countries to adopt the new revenue
standard Ind AS-115 or IFRS-15?
• Why this standard got deferred in India as well Internationally?
• What is the current status of these standard internationally? Whether
internationally the standard has been adopted anywhere?
• What is so different or difficult in the new revenue standard?
• What will be the major challenges in implementing the new revenue
standard?
45
Key area of changes: IND AS-115 Revenue
Recognition
• Key highlights of new standard:
• Control of goods and service V/s transfer of Risk and Reward
• Transfer of control = Transfer of Risk and Reward
• Five step model for revenue recognition:
• Identify Contract with the Customer
• Identify separate performance obligations in the contract
• Determine transaction price
• Allocate transaction price to separate performance obligations
• Recognize revenue when each performance obligation is
satisfied
e.g. Solar plant with free maintenance for 5 years, Real estate
developers, IT Support Service with Hardware element
46
Key area of changes: IND AS-110 Consolidation:
• Control Test:
• Indian GAAP
• 50% Voting power
OR
• Control Over Board composition
• IND-AS (Substance Over Form)
• Power over investee
&
• Exposure or rights to variable returns from involvement with
investee
&
• Ability to use power over investee to influence returns
47
Key area of changes: IND AS-110 Consolidation
48
Control
Normal
Control
De-facto
Control
51% 40%
Rule
based
Substanc
e based
Key area of changes: IND AS-110 Consolidation
Consolidate
(AS-21)
a a Both should
consolidate
Consolidate
(Ind-AS-
110)
x x Will be JV’s
and equity
method
consolidation
Loss in top line, bottom line and EBTA and only EPS will gain.
49
ABC Ltd.
A Ltd. B Ltd.
51% 49%
Board
Compositio
n
Key area of changes: IND AS-110 Consolidation:
• Other Key issues:
• Participative V/s Protective rights
• e.g. A Ltd.-70% Holding in Insurance Co. Ltd and B(PE Investor)
holds-30% but has budget rights and other important rights
• IGAAP- A Ltd. will consolidate
• Ind-AS- No consolidation and equity method of accounting
• Solution-??????????????????????????
• Potential Voting rights:
• Potential= Current + Future (Convertible Debentures)
• If the above is likely to be > 50%- May consolidate
• Consolidation of JV's:
• Proportionate Consolidation V/s equity method as allowed now
• Will come after EBTA but before Net income and taxes
50
g{tÇ~ lÉâÑtÇ~t}à|ãtÜ|SvÇ~|Çw|tAvÉÅ