42
On photocatalytic membrane reactors in water and wastewater treatment: recent experiences a nd perspectives 2nd Summer School on Environmental Applications of Advanced Oxidation Processes Porto (Portugal), July 10-14, 2017 Sylwia Mozia West Pomeranian University of Technology, Szczecin Institute of Chemical Technology and Environment Engineering ul. Pułaskiego 10, 70-322 Szczecin, Poland tel. +48 91 449 48 72, e-mail: [email protected]

On photocatalytic membrane reactors in water and ...€¦ · 1. A brief introduction to membrane processes 2. Photocatalytic membrane reactor (PMR) – what is it? 3. Examples of

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • On photocatalytic membrane reactorsin water and wastewater treatment:

    recent experiences and perspectives

    2nd Summer School onEnvironmental Applications of Advanced Oxidation Processes

    Porto (Portugal), July 10-14, 2017

    Sylwia Mozia

    West Pomeranian University of Technology, Szczecin Institute of Chemical Technology and Environment Engineering

    ul. Puaskiego 10, 70-322 Szczecin, Polandtel. +48 91 449 48 72, e-mail: [email protected]

  • Outline1. A brief introduction to membrane processes2. Photocatalytic membrane reactor (PMR) what is it?3. Examples of possible applications of PMRs for treatment

    of real water and wastewater:(I) Example 1: Treatment of effluents from a municipal wastewater treatment plant (MWWTP) in a PMR utilizing ultrafiltration (UF) application of a polymeric membrane(II) Example 2: Treatment of lake water in a PMR and a hybrid system coupling UVC/H2O2 and UF application of a ceramic membrane4. Conclusions and future trends

  • A brief introduction to membrane processes

  • Membrane what is it?

    membrane

    structure, having lateral dimensions much greater than its thickness, through which transfer may occur under a variety of driving forces(Terminology for membranes and membrane processes (IUPAC Recommendations 1996)

  • Driving force

    Transmembrane pressure

    P Concentration (or partial pressure)

    differencec, p

    Electrical potential difference

    E

    Microfiltration (MF)

    Ultrafiltration (UF)

    Nanofiltration (NF)

    Reverse osmosis (RO)

    Dialysis

    Pervaporation (PV)

    Membrane distillation (MD)

    Gas separation (GS)

    Liquid membranes (LM)

    ...

    Electrodialysis (ED, EDR)

    Membrane electrolysis (ME)

    ...

    Membrane processes

  • Pressure driven membrane processes

    Separation process

    Rejected substances

    Reverse osmosis

    Ultrafiltration

    Nanofiltration Microfiltration

    Particle filtration

    Salts (aq.)

    Metal ions

    Synthetic dyes

    Lactose (sugars)

    Milk proteins

    Gelatin

    Endotoxin pyrogen

    Viruses

    Colloidal silica

    E-coat pigment

    Red blood cells

    Bacteria

    Oil emulsion Activated

    carbon

    Human hair Giardia cyst

    Blue indigo dye

    Fat

    m 0,001 0,01 0,1 1,0 10 100 1000

    Mol. weight 100 200 1000 20000 100000 500000 106 5x106

    - MF: TMP < 0.3 MPa

    - UF: TMP 0.1 1 MPa

    - NF: TMP 0.5 3 MPa

    - RO: TMP 1 8 (10) MPa

    MF (0.1 10 um) UF (1 100 nm or 10 100 kDa)

    NF (< 2nm or 250 400 Da)

    RO (< 125 Da)

    driving force: transmembrane pressure

    (TMP)

    Synthetic dyes

    Mol. weight 100 200 1000 20000 100000 500000 106 5x106

    (m 0,001 0,01 0,1 1,0 10 100 1000

    Fat

    Blue indigo dye

    Giardia cyst

    Human hair

    Activated carbon

    Oil emulsion

    Bacteria

    Red blood cells

    E-coat pigment

    Colloidal silica

    Viruses

    Endotoxin pyrogen

    Gelatin

    Milk proteins

    Lactose (sugars)

    Metal ions

    Salts (aq.)

    Particle filtration

    Microfiltration

    Nanofiltration

    Ultrafiltration

    Reverse osmosis

    Rejected substances

    Separation process

  • Streams in membrane separation processes

    feed

    permeate

    a portion of feed stream which passes through the membrane; in case of water/wastewater treatment it contains mainly water and substances that were not rejected by the membrane

    retentate (concentrate)

    a portion of feed stream whichdoes not pass through the membrane; a concentrated solution containg components rejected by the membrane

    The product of a membrane process can be either permeate or retentate, or sometimes both streams.

  • Membranes in water and wastewater treatment -problems to solve:

    Permeate flux decline due to membrane fouling deposition of contaminants on the membrane surface or within its pores

    MF/UF membranes are not efficient in separation of low molecular organic contaminants low permeate quality

    water mono- and multivalent

    ions

    viruses &

    bacteria suspended

    solids colloids

    low molecular organic

    substances

  • Solution:

    PMR

  • What is a photocatalyticmembrane reactor?

  • Photocatalytic Membrane Reactor (PMR)

    A hybrid system in whichthe photocatalytic degradation

    and membrane separation occur simultaneously

  • PHOTOCATALYSIS:- decomposition and mineralization of contaminants- synthesis of useful organic compounds

    +MEMBRANE PROCESS:

    - retention of photocatalyst in the reaction environment- possibility of recovery and reuse of the photocatalyst in further runs- control of a residence time of reagents in the reactor- possibility of selective separation of products- realization of a continuous process with simultaneous separation of reagents and photocatalyst from the solution

    PMR=

  • PMRs - classification

    PMR

    liquid phasegaseous phase

    Driving force: P: microfiltration ultrafiltration nanofiltration

    Driving force: c, p: pervaporation dialysis membrane distillation

    according to the manner of photocatalyst introduction into the reactor

    according to the reaction environment

    according to the membrane technique applied (liquid phase reactions)

    with a photocatalyst suspended in the reaction mixture

    with a photocatalyst supported in/on the membrane

    (photocatalytic membranes)

  • PMRs with photocatalytic membranes

    FUNCTION OF THE MEMBRANE:

    photocatalyst support

    separation of the molecules present in the solution (initial compounds and products or by-products of their decomposition)

    photocatalyst

    membrane

    photocatalyst

    membrane

  • PHOTOCATALYTIC MEMBRANES

    S. Mozia, Separation and Purification Technology, 73 (2010) 7191

    PMRs with photocatalytic membranes

    light source light source

    non-photoactive support

    photoactive support

    photoactive separation layer

    non-photoactive separation layer

    a) b)

    non-photoactive separation layer

    non-photoactive support

    photoactive support

    light source

    b)

    a)

    photoactive separation layer

    light source

  • separation of photocatalyst particles

    separation of the molecules present in the solution (initial compounds and products or by-products of their decomposition)

    photocatalyst

    membrane

    PMRs with photocatalyst in a slurry

    FUNCTION OF THE MEMBRANE:

    membrane

    photocatalyst

  • A. Photocatalytic reaction conducted in a membrane module

    B. Photocatalytic reaction conducted in the feed tank

    C. Photocatalytic reaction conducted in an additional reservoir (photoreactor) located between the feed tank and membrane module

    PMRs with photocatalyst in a slurry: configurations

    retentate

    permeate

    feed

    membrane

    membrane module

    feed tank (photocatalyst in suspension)

    light source

    retentate

    permeate

    feed

    membrane

    membrane module

    feed tank (photocatalyst in suspension)

    light source

    retentate

    permeate

    membrane

    membrane module

    light source

    feed tank (photocatalyst in suspension)

    additional reservoir (photoreactor)

    feed

    S. Mozia, A.W. Morawski, R. Molinari, L. Palmisano, V. Loddo, Chapter 6 in Handbook of membrane reactors,Volume 2: Reactor types and industrial applications, Ed. A. Basile, Woodhead Publishing Limited, 2013, pp. 236-295

  • Example 1: Treatment of effluents from a municipal wastewater treatment plant

    (MWWTP) in a PMR utilizing ultrafiltration (UF)

    application of a polymeric membrane

  • Influence of photocatalyst on permeate flux

    membrane: PES, UE10 (Trisep Corp.), MWCO: 10 kDa 1.5 g TiO2P25/dm3TMP: 3 bar

    membrane fouling by TiO2 particles deterioration of permeate flux during filtration of TiO2

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    0 60 120 180 240 300time [min]

    J/J 0

    1.5g TiO2/dm3 0,4 m/s1.5g TiO2/dm3 0,6 m/s

    1.5g TiO2/dm3 0,8 m/s

    feed: TiO2 in distilled water

  • 0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    0 60 120 180 240 300time [min]

    J/J 0 1.5gTiO2/dm

    3 - 0.8m/s - 3 bar1.5g TiO2/dm3 - 0.8m/s - 2bar1.5g TiO2/dm3 - 0.8m/s - 1 bar

    vN: 0.8 m/s

    How to avoid membrane fouling?1. Careful selection of process conditions:

    - Transmembrane pressure (TMP)- Feed flow rate

    0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    0 1 2 3 4pressure [bar]

    perm

    eate

    flux

    [dm

    3 /m2 h

    ]

    pure waterTiO2

    UE10

    feed: TiO2 in distilled water

    Influence of photocatalyst on permeate flux

  • How to avoid membrane fouling?2. Selection of a photocatalyst

    UE10vF=0.8 m/s; TMP=3 bar0.5 gTiO2/dm3

    small particles, uniform distribution

    large particles, non-uniform distribution

    PhotocatalystSpecific

    surface area SBET [m2/g]

    Anatase over rutile ratio

    (A:R)

    Crystallite size of

    anatase [nm]

    A800 6 2:98 51

    P25 51 80:20 22

    ST-01 252 100:0 8

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    0.1 1 10 100 1000

    particle size [m]am

    ount

    by

    volu

    me

    q [%

    ]

    P25

    ST01

    A800

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    0 10 20 30

    time [h]

    J/J 0

    ST-01

    P25

    A800

    feed: TiO2 in distilled water

    Influence of photocatalyst on permeate flux

  • What is the infuence of photocatalysis on permeate flux duringtreatment of wastewater?

  • Treatment of wastewater in PMR utilizing UFMunicipal sewage treatment plant

    with a capacity of 418 000 equivalent citizens

    mechanical treatment

    biological treatment

    secondary settling tanks

    sieves, screens, grit chamber, primary

    settling tanks

    pre-denitrification, dephosphatation,

    nitrification

    sampling point PE sampling point SE

    www.maps.google.pl

  • Typical parameters of primary (PE) and secondary (SE) effluents applied in the experiments

    Parameters PE SETOC [mg/dm3] 70 - 80 12 - 19DOC [mg/dm3] 49 - 54 11 - 18TIC [mg/dm3] 58 - 100 42 58pH 7.5 - 8.5 7.2 - 8.5Conductivity [S/cm] 1020 - 1170 1040 - 1130TDS [ppm] 710 - 780 730 - 790Turbidity [NTU] 75 - 110 1 - 4N-NH4+ [mgN/dm3] 43 - 50 5 - 8

  • no TiO2:dense cake

    layer

    Increase of the permeate flux in the presence of TiO2 P25

    1.5 gTiO2 P25/dm3

    J 80%

    J 50%

    38%

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    0 50 100 150 200 250 300time [min]

    J/J 0

    PE - UFPE - PMR

    in the presence of TiO2:

    porous cake layer

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    0 50 100 150 200 250 300time [min]

    J/J 0

    SE - UFSE - PMR

    33%

    J 20%

    J 60%

    Influence of photocatalysis on permeate flux

  • Will PMR be effectivein treatment of

    wastewater?

  • 0102030405060708090

    UF 0.5gTiO2/dm3 1gTiO2/dm3 1.5gTiO2/dm3

    C [m

    g/dm

    3 ]

    TOC-feed

    DOC-feed

    DOC-permeate

    Mineralization of large molecular organic contaminants proceeds slowly.Overall treatment efficiency depends more on membrane separation than photocatalysis.

    Concentration of TOC and DOC in primary effluents (initial feed) and in permeate after

    5h of UF or PMR process

    Low molecular organic contaminants and products of their decompositionare not rejected by UF membranes.Overall treatment efficiency depends on effectiveness of photocatalysis.

    Non Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory DrugNaproxen sodium salt (MW 252 g/mol)

    Feed: Naproxen in primary effluents

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6Time [h]

    Con

    cent

    ratio

    n of

    Nap

    roxe

    n [u

    g/dm

    3 ]

    retentate permeate

    Possible application: post-treatment (polishing) of water/wastewater containing low concentrations of harmful or persistent organic contaminants (tens ug/dm3 or lower), e.g. pharmaceuticals or endocrine disrupting compounds.

    Removal of organic contaminants

    DOC in feed (5h): PE: ~ const.

  • Stability of polymericmembranes in PMRs

  • PMR with a light source located in the vicinity of membrane surface

    retentate

    permeate

    feed

    membrane

    membrane module

    feed tank (photocatalyst in suspension)

    light source

    a danger of destruction of the polymeric membrane structure by UV light or hydroxyl radicals

    polyethersulfone (PES) polysulfone (PSU)

    Resistance of membranes to UV:

    -SO3-

    polypropylene (PP), polyacrylonitrile (PAN) and cellulose acetate (CA) -CH-

    polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) and poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF)

    Stability of polymeric membranes in PMRs

  • PMR with a light source under or inside an additional reservoir (photoreactor)

    NO RISK OF DESTRUCTION OF POLYMERIC MEMBRANES BY UV LIGHT

    retentate

    permeate

    membrane

    membrane module

    light source

    feed tank (photocatalystin suspension)

    additionalreservoir(photoreactor)

    feed

    Stability of polymeric membranes in PMRs

  • 0

    0,2

    0,4

    0,6

    0,8

    1

    0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

    czas [h]

    J/J 0

    bez UV, z azydkiem sodu

    z UV, bez azydku sodu

    0

    0,2

    0,4

    0,6

    0,8

    1

    0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

    czas [h]

    J/J 0

    bez UV, z azydkiem sodu

    z UV, bez azydku sodu

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    before after 70h, UV after 70h, noUV

    % R

    dextran 40 kDa dextran 70 kDa

    photocatalysis

    filtration

    photocatalysis filtration

    membrane: PES, UE10 (Trisep Corp.) MWCO: 10 kDa

    loss of separation properties due to membrane skin layer damage, regardless of presence or absence of UV abrasive action of TiO2 particles

    photocatalyst: AEROXIDE TiO2 P25

    no UV, with sodium azide (NaN3)

    UV, no sodium azide (NaN3)

    time [h]

    Stability of polymeric membranes in PMRs

  • Example 2: Treatment of lake water in a PMR and a hybrid system coupling

    UVC/H2O2 and UF application of a ceramic

    membrane

  • Treatment of surface water in PMR and UVC/H2O2UF system

    Miedwie Lake - source of drinking water for Szczecin, Poland

    Water Treatment Plant ZPW Miedwie:max. production: 100 000 m3 of water per day

    (at present: ca. 55 000 m3/day)

    Water was collected after initial prefiltration through screens and sieves

  • Parameter Unit ValueTOC mg/dm3 8.1-8.7

    Conductivity S/cm 555-573Absorbance UV254 cm-1 0.1568-0.1707

    Turbidity NTU 0.54-1.66pH - 7.0-7.9Cl- mg/dm3 41.2-42.2

    NO3- mg/dm3 0.8-1.7SO42- mg/dm3 85.3-86.8PO43- mg/dm3 0-0.1Na+ mg/dm3 23.4-24.0K+ mg/dm3 4.9-5.4

    Ca2+ mg/dm3 63.1-67.2Mg2+ mg/dm3 16.5-17.1

    Typical parameters of lake water applied in the experiments

  • Influence of AOPs on permeate flux

    PMR

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    0 50 100 150 200 250 300

    J/J 0

    time [min]

    UVC photolysis100 mg/dm3500 mg/dm31000 mg/dm32000 mg/dm34000 mg/dm3

    UVC photolysis0.03 gH2O2/dm30.15 gH2O2/dm30.3 gH2O2/dm30.6 gH2O2/dm31.2 gH2O2/dm30

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    0 50 100 150 200 250 300

    J/J 0

    time [min]

    UVC photolysis0.5 gTiO2/dm31 gTiO2/dm31.5 gTiO2/dm32 gTiO2/dm3

    UVC photolysis0.5 gTiO2/dm3

    1 gTiO2/dm3

    1.5 gTiO2/dm3

    2 gTiO2/dm3

    Both AOPs (TiO2 photocatalysis and UVC/H2O2) have positiveinfluence on UF membrane fouling mitigation during treatmentof lake water

    BUT Increase of the permeate flux in the presence of TiO2 P25 was

    slightly higher than in the presence of H2O2

    UVC/H2O2UF

  • 0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    TOC

    rem

    oval

    [%]

    H2O2 concentration [g/dm3]

    Rfeed RtotalRfeed Rtotal

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    0.5 1 1.5 2

    TOC

    rem

    oval

    [%]

    TiO2 concentration [g/dm3]

    Rads Rfeed RtotalRtotalRads Rfeed

    Removal of organic contaminants

    PMR UVC/H2O2UF

    PMR: the highest TOC removal rate: 1 gTiO2/dm3. UVC/H2O2 UF: similar efficiency at 0.15 gH2O2/dm3.

    Increase of H2O2 concentration up to 0.3 g/dm3 improvementof mineralization efficiency

    Increase of TiO2 concentration up to 1.5 g/dm3 decreaseof mineralization efficiency

    58% 57%

    66%

    t = 5h t = 5h

  • Filtanium 5

    0102030405060708090

    100

    0 50 70 100t [h]

    R [%

    ]

    dekstran 5 kDa

    Filtanium 100

    0102030405060708090

    100

    0 50 70 100t [h]

    R [%

    ]

    dekstran 70 kDa

    membrane: TiO2 Filtanium 5kDa photocatalyst: AEROXIDE TiO2 P25

    membrane: TiO2 Filtanium 100kDa

    Loss of separation properties destruction of separation layer abrasive action of TiO2 in case of skin layer built of fine particles (fine UF membrane)

    No change in separation properties no damage of separation layer

    dextran 5kDa dextran 70kDa

    Stability of ceramic membranes in PMRs

  • A short summary

  • Hybrid systems coupling AOPs with membrane separation, e.g. PMRs have a great potential in water/wastewater

    treatment and reuse. Application of AOPs can result in membrane fouling mitigation and

    improvement of the efficiency of organics removal.Application of membrane separation is especially advantageous when

    retention of photocatalyst in the reaction environment is necessary. Membrane allows to realize a continuous process with simultaneous separation of reagents (and photocatalyst) from the solution.

    However, further investigations are still needed in order to improve the hybrid AOPs membrane systems performance.

    A particular attention should be paid to the selection of membranes for PMRs with reference to their resistance to:

    damage by oxidative species abrasion by photocatalyst particles

    It is very important to investigate the real systems, which focus on treatment of natural waters and real wastewaters. The number of reports concerning this subject is still limited, since most of the experiments have been conducted using model solutions.

  • Acknowledgments

    Dominika Darowna and Kacper Szymaski

  • 1. S. Mozia, A.W. Morawski, R. Molinari, L. Palmisano, V. Loddo, Chapter 6: Photocatalytic membrane reactors: fundamentals, membrane materials and operational issues, pp. 236-2952. R. Molinari, L. Palmisano, V. Loddo, S. Mozia, A.W. Morawski, Chapter 21: Photocatalytic membrane reactors: configurations, performance and applications in water treatment and chemical production, pp. 808-845

    Handbook of membrane reactors, Volume 2: Reactor types and industrial applications, Ed. Angelo Basile, Woodhead Publishing Limited, Cambridge, UK, 2013

  • Thank you for your attention

    Slajd numer 1Slajd numer 2Slajd numer 3Slajd numer 4Slajd numer 5Slajd numer 6Slajd numer 7Slajd numer 8Slajd numer 9Slajd numer 10Slajd numer 11Slajd numer 12Slajd numer 13Slajd numer 14Slajd numer 15Slajd numer 16Slajd numer 17Slajd numer 18Slajd numer 19Slajd numer 20Slajd numer 21Slajd numer 22Slajd numer 23Slajd numer 24Slajd numer 25Slajd numer 26Slajd numer 27Slajd numer 28Slajd numer 29Slajd numer 30Slajd numer 31Slajd numer 32Slajd numer 33Slajd numer 34Slajd numer 35Slajd numer 36Slajd numer 37Slajd numer 38Slajd numer 39Slajd numer 40Slajd numer 41Slajd numer 42