9
1 ON BIAS AMPLIFIERS Judea Pearl University of California Los Angeles (www.cs.ucla.edu/~judea/)

ON BIAS AMPLIFIERS

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

ON BIAS AMPLIFIERS. Judea Pearl University of California Los Angeles (www.cs.ucla.edu/~judea/). ON BIAS AMPLIFIERS Judea Pearl University of California Los Angeles (www.cs.ucla.edu/~judea/). THE PROBLEM: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: ON  BIAS   AMPLIFIERS

11

ON BIAS AMPLIFIERS

Judea Pearl University of California

Los Angeles(www.cs.ucla.edu/~judea/)

Page 2: ON  BIAS   AMPLIFIERS

22

THE PROBLEM:We wish to estimate the causal effect P(y|do(x)) by adjusting for a set Z of variables.

Given a graph, G, find Z so as to minimize the bias:

zxdoyPzPzxyP ))(|()(),|(

ON BIAS AMPLIFIERSJudea Pearl

University of CaliforniaLos Angeles

(www.cs.ucla.edu/~judea/)

Page 3: ON  BIAS   AMPLIFIERS

33

THE SOLUTION:Z must be admissible, i.e., satisfy the back-door criterion

But what if some confounders remain unmeasured (e.g., U)?

Would it help if we adjust for Z10? Z3? Perhaps Z5?

Or would it increase bias?

Z6

Z3

Z2

Z5

Z1

XY

Z10

Z7 Z8Z9

Z4

U

e.g., Z = {U, Z4, Z5}

Page 4: ON  BIAS   AMPLIFIERS

44

U

c1

X Y

Z

c2c3

c0

SURPRISING RESULT:Instrumental variables are Bias-Amplifiers in linear models (Bhattarcharya & Vogt 2007; Wooldridge 2009)

“Naive” bias

Adjusted bias

2123

2102

3

210

11))(|(),|( cc

c

ccc

c

cccxdoYE

xzxYE

xBz

2102100 ))(|()|( ccccccxdoYEx

xYEx

B

Page 5: ON  BIAS   AMPLIFIERS

55

INTUTION:When Z is allowed to vary, it absorbs (or explains) some of the changes in X.

When Z is fixed the burden falls on U alone, and transmitted to Y (resulting in a higher bias)

U

c1

X Y

Z

c2c3

c0

U

c1

X Y

Z

c2c3

c0

Page 6: ON  BIAS   AMPLIFIERS

66

c0

c2

Z

c3

U

YX

c4

T1

c1

WHAT’S BETWEEN AN INSTRUMENT AND A CONFOUNDER?Should we adjust for Z?

T2

ANSWER:

CONCLUSION:

23

12

3

4

1 c

cccc

Yes, if

No, otherwise

Adjusting for a parent of Y is safer than a parent of X

Page 7: ON  BIAS   AMPLIFIERS

77

WHAT ABOUT NON-LINEAR MODELS?

1. Conditioning on IVs may reduce or amplify bias; mostly amplify

2. Conditioning on IVs may introduce its own bias where none existed.

Page 8: ON  BIAS   AMPLIFIERS

88

CAN AN IV AMPLIFY SELECTION BIAS?

ANSWER: NoExercise: which selection bias will be amplifiedby Z? S1? S2? or S3?

1

X Y

Zc3 c0

2

S

UY

S= s0

U1

S1

X Y

Z

S2 S3

UY

U2

Page 9: ON  BIAS   AMPLIFIERS

99

CONCLUSIONS

• The prevailing practice of adjusting for all covariates, especially those that are good predictors of X (the “treatment assignment,” Rubin, 2009) is totally misguided.

• The “outcome mechanism” is as important, and much safer

• As X-rays are to the surgeon, graphs are for causation