Upload
thi
View
26
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Old Land ( Sharkia ). Project site. Old land. Zankalon Water Research Station Water Management Research Institute (NWRC). Activities. Tested variables and experimental design. Treatments:. Treatments for rice crop:. 2. Bio & N-fertilizers. 1. Planting method. Farmer method (flat) . - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Old Land (Sharkia)
Project site
Old land
Zankalon Water Research StationWater Management Research Institute (NWRC)
Activities
No. Activity Objective1 Test and adapt the raised bed
machine on wheat and sugarbeet in winter and maize and cotton in summer under old land conditions in Egypt
1. To evaluate the performance of the raised bed machine under Nile Delta’s clay soil
2. To determine the optimal bed width and furrow length using a modified machine
3. To evaluate the effect of furrow spacing (raised bed width) and furrow length on water/nutrients dynamics and water productivity
2 Nitrogen management under mechanized raised bed technology of winter (wheat, sugar beet, and berseem) crops and summer (maize and rice) crops under old land conditions in Egypt's Delta
1. To determine optimal rates of nitrogen application under different raised bed width
Tested variables and experimental designTreatments:
• BW1 = 65 cm • BW2 = 130 cm
Raised Bed Width
• FL1 (short) = 25 m • FL2 (long) = 50 m
Furrow Length
• N1 = 100%• N2 = 85%• N3 = 70%
Nitrogen rates
Treatments for rice crop:
1. Planting method
2. Bio & N-fertilizers
Farmer method (flat)
furrow method
Bio+ 75% N 100% N
Bio + 100% N
Implementation
Main soil physical and hydro-physical characteristics at the experimental site.
Depth(cm)
Particle size analysis
FC(%)
WP (%)
AW (%)
Bulk density(g/cm3)
EC (dS/m) pH
Sand Silt Clay Texture
0 – 20 25.80 28.90 43.51 Clay 43.51 23.55 19.96 1.25 1.40 8.10
20 – 40 25.12 30.10 42.50 Clay 40.50 21.06 19.44 1.27 1.22 8.00
40 – 60 26.90 31.50 40.50 Clay 37.12 17.59 19.53 1.35 1.25 8.01
60 – 80 29.78 31.50 37.12 Clay 36.25 16.62 19.63 1.40 1.05 8.02
Mean 26.90 30.50 40.91 Clay 39.35 19.71 19.64 1.32 1.23 8.03
Chemical analysis of irrigation water
Sample EC (dS/m)
Cations (meq/l) Anions (meq/l)
Ca2+ Mg2+ Na+ K+ CO32- HCO3
- Cl- SO42-
1 0.41 1.60 1.71 1.35 0.25 - 3.40 0.73 0.78
2 0.39 1.58 1.69 1.39 0.27 - 3.48 0.70 0.75
3 0.37 1.71 1.76 1.37 0.32 - 3.50 0.76 0.90
Mean 0.39 1.63 1.72 1.37 0.28 - 3.46 0.73 0.81
Average monthly agro-met. values at the experimental site
Date
Air temperature (oC)RH(%)
ET (mm/d)
Total Rain
(mm/mon.)T. min T. max T. mean
NOV. 2010 12.16 21.20 16.68 61.36 3.41 -
DEC. 2010 9.35 23.25 16.40 62.48 2.13 0.50
JAN. 2011 6.38 20.38 13.64 62.45 2.65 1.30
FEB. 2011 7.61 21.64 14.63 59.25 2.98 -
MAR. 2011 7.32 22.93 15.12 55.87 3.76 15.00
APR. 2011 10.68 27.56 19.03 54.80 4.91 9.60
MAY 2011 13.8 31.77 22.48 50.74 7.37 -
WheatEffect of furrow length and width and nitrogen level on grain and straw yields and yield components of wheat crop (winter season 2010/2011).
Treatments Plant height (cm)
1000-grains weight
(gm)
Grain yield(t/ha)
Straw yield(t/ha)
Length (m)
L1 -25m 107.1 47.09 8.159 11.721L2 -50m 109.8 49.51 8.643 12.103F- test ** ** * **
Width W1 -65cm 106.8 47.45 7.819 11.790W2 -130cm 110.2 49.16 8.982 12.035F1 test ** ** ** **
N
N1 -100% 109.7 50.49 8.869 12.052N2 -85% 108.9 48.84 8.539 11.949N3 -70% 106.7 45.57 7.793 11.737F. test ** ** ** **
Interactions
LW * N.S N.S *LN N.S N.S ** N.SWN N.S N.S ** N.SLWN N.S N.S * N.S
Effect of furrow length and width and nitrogen level on some water relations of wheat crop (winter season 2010/2011).
Applied Water(m3/ha)
Water SavedWater
Consumptive use
(m3/ha)
IWUE(kg/m3)
WUE(kg/m3)% (m3/ha)
LL1- 25m 4857.15 - - 3709.0 1.711 2.201
L2 - 50m 4404.76 9.31 452.39 3243.0 1.991 2.670
WW1-65cm 5089.28 - - 3559.0 1.543 2.215
W2-130cm 4172.62 18.01 916.66 3393.0 2.159 2.655
N
N1-100% 4821.42 - - 3553.0 1.866 2.519
N2-85% 4650.80 3.56 171.43 3486.0 1.873 2.459
N3-70% 4420.54 8.31 400.81 3388.0 1.815 2.327IWUE = Irrigation water use efficiency (kg grain/m3 applied irrigation water)WUE = Water use efficiency (kg grain/m3 consumed water)
SugarbeetEffect of furrow length and width and nitrogen level on sugar beet yield and quality (winter season 2010/2011).
Treatments Root Yield (t/ha)
Sucrose Percent
(%)
Purity (%)
Sugar yield(t/ha)
LL1-25m 77.94 20.0 79.85 15.60L2-50m 82.65 20.35 79.60 16.84F- test * N.S N.S **
WW1-65cm 74.40 19.85 79.95 14.79W2-130cm 86.18 20.50 79.50 17.65F1 test ** ** * **
N
N1-100% 85.47 19.71 79.16 16.86N2-85% 80.40 20.22 79.68 16.32N3-70% 75.00 20.59 80.34 15.48F. test ** ** ** **
Interactions
LW N.S N.S N.S N.SLN ** N.S ** **WN N.S N.S ** *LWN N.S N.S N.S N.S
Effect of furrow length and width and nitrogen level on some water relations of sugar beet crop (winter season 2010-2011).
Treatments Applied water (m3/ha)
Water SaveWater
consumptive use
(m3/ha)
IWUE (kg/m3) WUE (kg/m3)
(m3/ha) (%) Root Sugar Root Sugar
LL1 - 25m 7161.8 - - 5094.9 1.108 0.223 1.642 0.330
L2 - 50m 6746.9 414.92 5.79 4777.2 1.255 0.256 1.768 0.361
WW1- 65cm 7748.0 - 5533.5 0.964 0.192 1.418 0.282
W2-130cm 6160.7 1587.41 20.48 4338.3 1.400 0.287 1.990 0.408
N
N1 - 100% 7048.0 - 5063.1 1.234 0.245 1.732 0.342
N2 - 85% 6948.0 - 4898.7 1.189 0.239 1.686 0.343
N3 - 70% 6867.0 - 4845.8 1.123 0.233 1.696 0.351
Treatments Plant height (cm)
Grain yield/plant
(gm)
100 grains weight (gm)
Grain yield(ton/ha)
LL1 25 m 279.71 477.23 27.39 7.877L2 50 m 286.93 546.27 28.81 8.225
f. test ** ** * N.S
WW1 65 cm 279.26 476.35 27.61 7.484W2 130 cm 287.38 527.15 28.6 8.618
f. test ** ** ** **
N
N1 100% 286.41 540.13 29.38 8.487N2 85% 283.85 514.63 28.42 8.201N3 70% 27.68 450.48 26.51 7.465
f. test ** ** ** **
Interaction
L. W N.S * N.S N.SL. N N.S ** N.S N.SW. N N.S ** N.S N.S
L.W.N N.S N.S N.S N.S
MaizeEffect of furrow length and width and nitrogen level on maize yield and yield components (summer season 2011).
Effect of furrow length and width and nitrogen level on some water relations of maize crop (summer 2011).
TreatmentsConsumed
water(m3\ha)
Applied water
(m3\ha)
WUE(kg/m3)
IWUE(kg/m3
applied)
Water saved (m3/ha, %)
LL1 25 m 4953.66 7674.06 1.59 1.03 -
L2 50 m 4651.16 7232.8 1.77 1.14 441 (5.7%)
WW1 65 cm 4814.3 8241.9 1.55 0.91
W2 130 cm 4650.8 6664.9 1.85 1.29 1577 (19%)
N
N1 100% 4942. 7578.33 1.72 1.12
N2 85% 4814.3 7458.33 1.70 1.10 120 (1.6%)
N3 70% 4650.8 7323.66 1.61 1.02 254 (3.4%)
Treatments Plant height (cm)
1000 grains weight (gm)
Panicle grains weight (gm)
Grain yield (ton/fed)
Planting method ( M )Normal transplanting method (M1)
101.27 25.04 1.88 9.34
Transplanting as strips method (M2).
104.18 26.21 2.05 10.48
F. test ** * ** **
Nitrogen (N)N1: 100% nitrogen 104.89 26.38 2.1 10.23
N1: 85% nitrogen 102.13 25.88 2.05 10.13
N1: 70% nitrogen 99.75 24.63 1.75 9.38
F. test ** ** ** **
Interactions
M*N N.S N.S N.S N.S
RiceEffect of cultivation methods and nitrogen levels on rice yield and yield components (summer 2011).
Planting methods
(M)
Total amount of applied water
(m3/ha)
Grain yield (t/ha)
Yield increasing
(%)
Water saving
WUE (kg/m3)
m3/ha (%)
Normal Transplanting(M1) 14878.0 9.34 - - - 0.628
Furrow method (M2).
9664.0 10.48 12.24 5214.0 35.00 1.084
Total amount of applied water, rice yield, water savings and water use efficiency (WUE) as affected by planting methods and nitrogen levels.
IIOut Scaling and Dissemination
Three field days and three harvest days were conducted in the site to disseminate the activities being conducted in the benchmarks
Farmers from Sharkia Governorate, officials, extension agents, researchers from ARC, NWRC, and ICARDA attended the field days.
Field & Harvest Days
Old LandFD
Old LandHD
Thank you