OISD-GDN-212

FOR RESTRICTED CIRCULATION ONLY

GUIDELINES ON ENVIRONMENTAL AUDIT (INTERNAL)

IN DOWNSTREAM PETROLEUM SECTOR

Prepared By COMMITTEE ON

“GUIDELINES ON ENVIRONMENTAL AUDIT IN DOWNSTREAM PETROLEUM SECTOR

OIL INDUSTRY SAFETY DIRECTORATE 7th Floor, New Delhi House,

27, Barakhamba Road, New Delhi - 110001

(ii)

NOTE

Oil INDUSTRY SAFETY DIRETORATE (OISD) publications are

prepared for use in the Oil and Gas industry under Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas. These are the property of Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas and shall not be reproduced or copied and loaned or exhibited to others without written consent from OISD.

Though every effort has been made to assure the accuracy and reliability of

the data contained in these documents, OISD hereby expressly disclaims any liability or responsibility for loss or damage resulting from their use.

These documents are intended to supplement rather than replace the

prevailing statutory requirements.

(iii)

FOREWORD

Oil industry in India is more than 100 years old handling variety of hydrocarbon material, natural gas, crude oil and petroleum products. With the technological advances and need for transportation of bulk energy carrier and natural gas over the years a variety of practices have been in vogue because of collaboration/association with different foreign companies and governments.

With this in view, the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas in 1986 constituted a Safety Council assisted by the Oil Industry Safety Directorate (OISD) staffed from within the industry in formulating and implementing a series of self regulatory measures aimed at removing obsolescence, , standardizing and upgrading the existing standards to ensure safer operations. Accordingly, the Principal Panelists of OISD were requested to nominate the experienced persons in line for the above functional committee. OISD had constituted the functional committee of expert persons and finalized this draft of guidelines in several periodic meetings and discussions, based on the background note.

Downstream petroleum industry deals with oil refining, gas processing, transportation, pipelines and marketing installation. These activities generate substantial amount of pollutants (solid, liquid and gaseous) which are subjected to treatment to meet the specified standards and if not properly managed shall adversely affect the environment.

Further, to monitor and control the various aspects of environment of petroleum sector the industry has to take appropriate measures through regulations of Government of India and by implementing novel environmental friendly technologies coupled with efficient Environment Management System. In this regard Government of India has issued a gazette notification related to the Environment audit i.e. ENVIRONMENT STATEMENT (as part of Environment audit) 1993 or future amendment to the notification from time to time.

To assist the industry in achieving the above objective, Oil Industry Safety Directorate (OISD), Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas, a nodal agency for Petroleum industries has formulated the Guidelines on Environmental Audit (Internal) Downstream Petroleum Sector.

This document was prepared based on the accumulated knowledge and experience of industry members and the various National and International codes and practices. It is expected that these guidelines on environmental audit would be beneficial to user industry.

This document will be reviewed periodically for improvements based on the new experiences and better understanding.

Suggestions from industry members may be addressed to :

The Coordinator Functional Committee on

“Guidelines on Environmental Audit in Downstream Petroleum Sector” “OIL INDUSTRY SAFETY DIRECTORATE

7th Floor, New Delhi House, 27, Barakhamba Road, New Delhi - 110001

(iv)

COMMITTE ON GUIDELINES ON ENVIRONMENTAL AUDIT (INTERNAL)

IN DOWNSTREAM PETROLEUM SECTOR -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME ORGANISATION -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- LEADER MOHAN KRISHNAN INDIAN OIL CORPORATIN LTD, MUMBAI MEMBERS K. RAMADORAI CHENNAI PETROLEUM CORP. LTD., CHENNAI K. C. JOHN KOCHI REFINERIES LTD., KOCHI R. NEWAR NUMALIGARH REFINERY LTD., NUMALIGARH N. K. BHARADWAJ NUMALIGARH REFINERY LTD., NUMALIGARH T. K. KUMAR INDIAN OIL CORP. LTD., NOIDA VINOD MOUDGIL IBP LIMITED, NEW DELHI C. J. IYER BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION

LIMITED, MUMBAI. K. SWAMINATHAN INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED,

NEW DELHI J. S. SHARMA OIL INDUSTRY SAFETY DIRCTORATE COORDINATOR V. K. SRIVASTAVA OIL INDUSTRY SAFETY DIRCTORATE --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(v)

GUIDELINES ON ENVIRONMENTAL AUDIT (INTERNAL) IN DOWNSTREAM PETROLEUM SECTOR

CONTENTS SECTION DESCRIPTION PAGE NO. 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 2.0 OBJECTIVES OF ENVIRONMENTAL AUDIT 1 3.0 SCOPE 2 4.0 METHODOLOGY FOR ENVIRONEMNTAL AUDIT 2 5.0 USE OF ENVIRONMENTAL AUDIT CHECKLISTS 2 6.0 PREPARATION BEFORE SITE VISIT FOR AUDIT 2 7.0 ENVIRONMENTAL AUDIT 3 8.0 AUDIT REPORTS 4 9.0 FOLLOW UP AND IMPLEMENTATION OF AUDIT

RECOMMENTATIONDS 5 ANNEXURE – I CHECKLIST FOR OIL REFINERIES AND GAS PROCESSING 6-20 ANNEXURE – II CHECK LIST FOR PIPELINES & MARKETING TERMINALS 21-30 ANNEXURE - III FORMAT FOR THE ENVIRONMENTAL AUDIT REPORT 31

(vi)

1

GUIDELINES ON ENVIRONMENTAL AUDIT (INTERNAL)

IN DOWNSTREAM PETROLEUM SECTOR 1.0 INTRODUCTION The environmental audit is an important tool for checking and verification of environment management plans and provides detailed information on the types, volumes, locations and handling procedures of all materials that have or likely to have potential impact on the environment which determines whether operations are in compliance with statutory requirements. Environmental audit helps find ways to make the operating facilities more safe sufficient in the use of resources, reduce generation of wastes and adverse impact on the environment to improve the work environment and protect the health of the workers. As a result the organizations gains by lower input cost, environment friendly operations harmonious relations with the local committee as well as the regulatory agencies, goodwill of the customers and enhanced corporate image. The audit also helps in developing environment management plan which sets the framework for future actions and necessary planning for the resources required for enhanced environmental performance of an organisation. Therefore, necessary guidelines on the subject have been evolved considering the complexity and hazardous nature of various process and operating facilities of oil refining and gas processing,

transportation, pipeline and marketing installations. 2.0 OBJECTIVES OF ENVIRONMENTAL AUDITS While the basic aim of environmental audit is to identify the areas of weaknesses and its strengths, environmental audits are undertaken to meet different specific objectives viz.

1. To identify any design deficiencies and also any weaknesses which might have cropped up during modifications / additions of facilities.

2. To ensure that environmental

protection facilities and systems are well maintained.

3. To ensure that operating /

maintenance procedures , work practices are as per those stipulated in the manuals and standards to protect the environment.

4. To check whether management of

the company is prepared for handling environmental emergencies and an effective environmental management plan is available.

5. To check the compliance of

statutory regulations , standards codes etc.

2

3.0 SCOPE The scope of these guidelines is limited to downstream petroleum sector facilities namely crude/product pipelines, oil refineries, gas processing plants and marketing installations. It does not cover the road / rail tanker transportation and retail outlets of oil and gas . 4.0 METHODOLOGY OF

ENVIRONMENTAL AUDIT Before starting the audit programme the frequency, composition of audit team and duration of audit should be clearly spelt out. As a guideline following is the suggested frequency, size and composition of team and duration of the audit. 4.1 Frequency The audit should be carried out once every year for all downstream petroleum sector installations including oil refining and gas processing plants, pipeline and marketing terminals. 4.2 Multi Disciplinary Audit Teams i. The audit should be carried out

through multi disciplinary audit teams. The composition of the audit may vary depending of the group and areas to be audited. The team members should have necessary experience and background to undertake in-depth environmental audit for the facilities to be audited. A team of 3 to 4 experienced officers

from various disciplines having knowledge of environmental aspects related to downstream petroleum sector.

One of the senior member of the team should be designated as the leader of the audit team .

4.2 Duration

The duration of the audit for oil refining and gas processing should be 4 to 5 days and Marketing and Pipelines should be 1 to 2 days.

5.0 USE OF ENVIRONMENTAL AUDIT CHECKLISTS

A Checklist for facilities of oil refining and gas processing has been prepared and is enclosed at Annexure – I. The same for pipelines and marketing terminals has also been prepared and is placed at Annexure –II . The data in this checklist should be filled by the units / facilities wherever it is applicable for their plant and units. 6.0 PREPARATION BEFORE SITE VISITS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL AUDIT Before the audit team visits any particular facility for carrying out the environmental audit it would be essential to study all relevant documents as below:

- Layouts - P & IDS - Operating Manuals - Maintenance/ Inspection

Manuals

3

- Consent letters from Regulatory Authorities.

7.0 ENVIRONMENTAL AUDIT 7.1 Kick off Meeting The audit shall start with kick off meeting wherein objectives of the environmental audit, its background and modalities shall be very clearly explained to the managers of the site. 7.2 Document Review : Plant/site managers are need to be informed about inspection and evaluation of documents which will be inspected, verified and observed during the audit. These documents are listed below : i. Copies of valid latest statutory

authorization and consents under air, water and hazardous waste act obtained from the regulatory authorities.

ii. Copy of environmental clearance

conditions laid down by MOEF while according environmental clearance.

iii. Copy of NOC and environment

clearances obtained for different projects from statutory authorities.

iv. Environmental Impact

Assessment report (if not available then status of air water and land environment).

v. Environmental Management Plan

vi. Risk assessment study report

and Disaster Management Plan. vii. Unit Operational manuals and

manuals describing different waste water connecting networks and treatment facilities hazardous waste management and storage facilities treated effluent reuse network and other pollution control and monitoring facilities.

viii. Copies of last internal and

external environmental audit reports including latest audit findings with their compliance.

ix. Copy of environmental

statement submitted to state pollution control board from time to time.

x. Description of pollution control

facilities available for air, water and solid waste treatment.

xi. Details of underground /

aboveground Oily Water Sewer , Contaminated Rain Water Sewer & Drains along with details of Effluent Treatment Plant.

xii. Details of ambient air quality

monitoring being carried out indicating number of stations and parameters being monitored.

xiii. Record of stack flue gas

monitoring.

4

xiv. Copies of status of review of conditions given in various consent / authorisation / clearances / NOCs.

xv. Complaints if any by local

residents and other Non Govt. Organizations (NGO) and Govt. bodies.

xvi. Record of Occupational Health

& Environmental monitoring. 7.3 Site Visit / Verifications Discussions with concerned operating personnel should be carried out during audit with the following point of view: i. Review of processing facilities

should be carried out and records should be evaluated for verification of different material balances including sources and extent of pollution generation.

ii. Review of Pollution control and

monitoring facilities such as effluent treatment plant, Amine Treating Unit / Sour Water Stripper Unit /Sulfur Recovery Unit/ or nay pollutant reducing units and ambient air quality monitoring stations should be visited with a view to verify the performance of these units.

iii. Statutory Aspects and

compliance should be verified.

iv. Critical review and observation on work place environment should be carried out.

v. Observation on house keeping

and green belt should be made. vi. Resource conservation efforts

being made by the plant authorities should be reviewed .

vii. Calibration record of monitoring

and other equipment should be reviewed.

viii. Adequacy of laboratory

equipments, test methods, procedures and record keeping should be reviewed.

ix. Preparedness for oil spill

response management should be reviewed.

x. Adequacy of disaster

management plan and preparedness should be reviewed.

xi. Training procedures and general

competence and awareness of concerned personnel should be reviewed and evaluated.

. 7.4 Close -off Meeting Team should organize close off meeting wherein leader or his nominee should present the broad findings of the audit to the management of the company. 8 PREPARATION OF AUDIT

REPORTS The audit team should prepare the environmental audit report which should

5

contain observations and recommendations including the brief of modalities adopted for conducting the environmental audit before finalising the report the team should give a presentation to the operating / management personnel of the organisation which has been audited. The report should be in the format given in the Annexure – III. 9 FOLLOW UP AND

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE AUDIT RECOMMENDATIONS

Appraisal of audit report shall be submitted to the management of the plant along with action plan with time frame for further improvement and follow up by the management of the company should be done regularly to assess the status of implementation of the recommendations and quarterly compliance report should be submitted to auditors.

6

ANNEXURE – I

CHECK-LIST

FOR ENVIRONMENTAL AUDIT

FOR DOWNSTREAM PETROLEUM SECTOR

(Data to be filled by Refineries / Gas Processing Units wherever and whichever is applicable for their facilities)

NAME OF THE UNIT / FACILITY ------------------------ TYPE OF THE UNIT / FACILITY Refinery / Gas Processing AUDIT FOR THE YEAR ------------------------ DESIGN CAPACITY FOR THE AUDITED YEAR ------------------------ ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT ------------------------ SUBMITTED TO STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD FOR THE YEAR PART A : WATER ENVIRONMENT

A.1 RAW WATER INVENTORY

DESIGN NORMS

ACTUAL REMAKRS

A.1.1 RAW WATER SOURCE River / Municipal / Borewell

A.1.2. RAW WATER INTAKE, M3/HR (MIN.) (MAX.) (AVG.) (DESIGN)

A.1.3 RAW WATER TREATMENT SCHEME

7

A.1.4

RAW WATER BALANCE

- INTAKE M3/HR - OUTPUT MR/HR - (% AGE OF INTAKE) - BLOW DOWN & LOSSES M3/HR (% AGE OF INTAKE)

Please attach a chart for water balance.

DESIGN NORMS

ACTUAL REMARKS

A.1.5 TREATED WATER DISTRIBUTION - PROCESS UNITS, M3/HR - COOLING TOWER MAKE UP

M3/HR - DRINKING WATER M3/HR - DM PLANT FEED M3/HR - FIRE WATER MAKE UP M3/HR - OTHERS (SPECIFY) M3/HR - LOSSES M3/HR - CYCLE OF CONCENTRATION IN

COOLING TOWER

DESIGN ACTUAL REMARKS

A.2 EFFLUENT INVENTORY A.2.1 QUANTITY GENERATED, M3/HR

(DRY WEATHER FLOW) MIN MAX. AVG.

8

A.2.1.1 PLANT WISE BREAK UP (AVG.) DRY

WEATHER FLOW) - TANK FARM -OM&S -PROCESS UNITS

- DESALTER BRINE - SPENT CAUSTIC - SWS DRAINS

FLOOR WASHINGS C/T BLOWDOWN THERMAL POWER STATIONS BOILER BLOWDOWN DM PLANT ( NEUTRALISED EFFLUENT) WORKSHOP LABORATORY COKE CUTTING SANITARY EFFLUENT

- FROM PLANT - FROM TOWNSHIP

OTHERS (PLS. SPECIFY) TOTAL QUANTITY M3/HR

A.2.2 SEGREGATION, BUILT IN (a) BETWEEN OIL CONTAMINATED &

(NON CONTAMINATED STREAMS (SPECIFY) (b) BETWEEN HIGH & LOW TDS

STREAMS (SPECIFY) COMMENT ON SEGREGATION / TREATMENT / REUSE / DISPOSAL INFRASTRUCTURE & PRACTICES.

COLLECTION TREATMENT REUSE/ DISPOSAL

A.2.3 DETAILS OF ETP SCHEME WITH WRITE UP AND FLOW DIAGRAM

DESIGN ACTUAL OPERATIONS

REMARKS

A.2.4 ETP PERFORMANCE (AVG.QUALITY,MG/LT)

QUALITY AT INLET TO ETP

QUALITY AT OUT LET OF PRE TREATMENT QUALITY OF OUTLET OF CHEM ICAL TREATMENT

QUALITY OF OUTLETOF BIO TREATMENT

QUALITY OF OUTLETOF TERITIARY

PH OIL* SULPHIDE* PHENOL*

BOD* TSS*

9

TREATMENT QUALITY OF EFFLUENT AT FINAL OUTLET MINAS REQUIREMENTS ANY DEVIATIONS WITH RESPECT TO MINAS “*” DENOTES “In PPM

A.2.5 QUALITY ASSURANCE OF MONITORED DATA pH OIL PHENOL SULPHIDE BOD TSS COD HEAVY METALS ETC.

METHOD PRESCRIBED

OF TESTING ACTUALS / REQUENCY OF QA CHECKS*

REMARKS

A.2.6 TREATED EFFLUENT DISCHARGE POINT

CONSENT/ DESIGN

ACTUAL REMARKS

A.2.7 TOWNSHIP EFFLUENT DISCHARGE POINT

DESIGN ACTUAL REMARKS

A.2.8 STORM WATER DISCHARGE POINT

DESIGN ACTUAL REMARKS

A.2.9 QUALITY OF RECEIVING WATER BODY UPSTREAM OF DISCHARGE POINT DOWNSTREAM OF DISCHARGE POINT (INCLUDE PARAMETERS AS PER NOTIFICATION GSR 422(E) DATED 19.5.93

A.3 COMPLIANCE OF STANDARDS / CONSENT

A.3.1 CONSENT FOR EFFLUENTDISCH. VALID TILL

10

A.3.2 EFFLUENT DISCHARGE QUANTITY

M3/HR

AS PER CONSENT

ACTUAL REMARKS

A.3.3 PERFORMANCE BASED ON LOAD BASED STIPULATIONS (Kg per 1000 tons of crude processed) OIL PHENOL SULPHIDE BOD TSS OTHER PARAMETERS, IF ANY AS PER CONSENT (PLEASE LIST)

AS PER CONSENT

ACTUAL REMARKS

A.3.4 NO. OF DAYS OF NON-COMPLIANCE AND REASONS FOR SAME

A.3.5 CORRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN

A.3.6 RESULTS AFTER CORRECTIVE ACTION

A.4 DETAILS OF STORM WATER COLLECTION SYSTEM

B. AIR ENVIRONMENT

B.1 CONSENT CONDITIONS OF SPCB / MOEF FOR SO2 EMISSION AND ITS VALIDITY

AS PER CONSENT

ACTUAL REMARKS

B.2 CONSENT CONDITIONS OF SPCB / MOEF FOR EMISSION OF ANY OTHER POLLUTANT AND ITS VALIDITY

B.3 SULPHUR BALANCE

DESIGN ACTUAL REMARKS

B.3.1 SULPHUR CONTENT IN IFO, %WT

B.3.2 SULPHUR CONTENT IN FG,%WT

B.3.3 SULPHUR IN FCCU FEED, %WT

B.3.4 SULFPHUR IN IFO CHECKED DAILY / WEEKLY/ MONTHLY/ QUARTERLY / ONLINE

B.3.5. SULFPHUR IN FG CHECKED DAILY / WEEKLY/ MONTHLY/ QUARTERLY / ONLINE

B.3.6 EFFICIENCY OF AMINE TREATING UNIT

DESIGN ACTUAL REMARKS

B.3.7 EFFICIENCY OF SWS STRIPPERS DESIGN ACTUAL REMARKS

11

B.3.8 HOW MANY TRAINS OF SRU INSTALLED

B.3.9 WHETHER STAND BY SRU AVAILABLE

B.3.10 EFFICIENTY OF SRU TRAINS

DESIGN ACTUAL REMARKS

B.3.11 WHETHER TAIL GAS TREATMENT IS PROVIDED

B.3.12 STACK WISE SO2 EMISSION AS PER CALCULATION

B.3.13 STACK WISE SO2 EMISSION AS PER ACTUAL MONITORING

B.4 FUGITIVE EMISSION B.4..1 WHETHER FUGITIVE EMISSION SURVEY

HAS BEEN CARRIED OUT (ATTACH SOURCE WISE FUGITIVE EMISSION SURVEY RESULTS)

B.4.2

WHETHER INSTRUMENTS ARE AVAILABLE

B.4.3 CORRECTIVE ACTIONS INITIATED TO REDUCE FUGITIVE EMISSION

B.4.4 RESULTS AFTER CORRECTIONS B.4.5 WHETHER TANK SEALS CONDITIONS

ARE CHECKED REGULARLY ATTACH TANK WISE SEAL CONDITION DETAILS

B.4.6 WHETHER MECHANICAL SEALS CONDITIONS ARE CHECKED REGULARLY

B.4.7 WHETHER COMPRESSER SEAL OIL DRAINING / RECLAMATION CARRIED OUT PROPERLY.

B.4.8 HOW MANY SEALS IN EACH CASE ARE NOT WORKING

B.4.9 WHAT CPRRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN FOR IMPROVING SEAL CONDITION

B.4.10 WHETHER ALL SRV’s ARE CONNECTED TO FLARE

B.4.11 WHETHER TANK BREATHER VALVE MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE IS AVAILABLE

B.4.12 WHETHR LIGHT PRODUCTS INCLUDING HSD ARE STORED IN FLOATING ROOF

12

TANKS

B4.13 WHETHER CBD’s ARE BEING OPERATED

B.4.14 WHETHER FUGITIVE EMISSION SURVEY IS CARRIED OUT FOR

- SAMPLING POINTS, - WATER DRAINS FROM BULLETS /

SPHERES/ TANKS - CLORINE / AMONIA / AMINE

STORAGE IF SO ANY AREA OF CONCERN /ACTION TAKEN

B.5 AMBIENT AIR QUALITY MONITORING

B.5.1 NO. OF AAQM STATIONS IN

OPERATION AND POLLUTANT MONITORED SO2, CO. NOX, SPM, RPM, HC, NH3

AS PER CONSENT

AS PROVIDED

B.5.2 DEVIATIONS, IF ANY AND CORRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN

B. 5.3 INDICATE SPECIAL CONSENT CONDITIONS IF ANY AND THEIR COMPLIANCE STATUS

B. 5.4 LOCATION OF AAQM STATIONS BASED ON DISPERSION MODELING / SPCB RECOMMENDATIONS / OTHER CONSIDERATION

B.5.5 FREQUENCY OF MONITORING AT MANUAL STATIONS BIWEEKLY/WEEKLY/ FORTNIGHTLY / MONTHLY

B.5.6 WHETHER METEOROLOGICAL MONITORINGS STATIONS INSTALLED YES/NO IF YES, WHETHER CONTINUOUS TYPE PARAMETERS MONITORED WIND SPEED YES/NO TEMPERATURE YES/NO RAIN FALL YES/NO OTHERS

B.5.8 AMBIENT AIR QUALITY ANALYSERS

B.5.8.1 ON LINE INSTRUMENTS

13

- OPERATING RANGE - ZERO / SPAN / PRECISION /

CHECK/FREQUENCY - % AGE VARIATION ACCEPTED

FOR ZSP CEHCK - LAST CALIBRATION DONE IN (PL.

LIST EACH ANALYSER) - WHETHER CALIBRATOR IS USED

FOR ZSP CHECK AND CALIBRATION

- IF YES, FREQUENCY OF FLOW CHECK OF CALIBRATOR USING SOAP BUBBLE METHOD OR OTHER METHOD

- (PL. SPECIFY)

IF NO, PL. SPECIFY METHOD OF ZSP CHECK AND CALIBRATION

B.5.8.2 HIGH VOLUME SAMPLER WHETHER :

- FLOW CHECK OF SAMPLE PUMP IS DONE

- REAGENT STRENTH CROSS CHECK DONE

- CONDITIONING OF CLEAN AND DIRTY FILTER PAPER PRIOR TO WEIGHMENT IS DONE

B.6 STACK ANALYSERS

B.6.1 ONLINE INSTRUMENTS

- OPERATING RANGE - PROBE CLEANING FREQUENCY - ZERO / SPAN / PRECISION CHECK

FREQUENCY - % AGE VARIATION ACCEPTED

FOR ZSP CHECK - LAST CALIBERATION DONE (PL.

LIST EACH ANALYSER) - WHETHER CALIBRATOR IS USED

FOR ZSP CHECK AND CALIBRATION

- IF YES, FREQUENCY OF FLOW CHECK OF CALIBRATOR USING

14

SOAP BUBBLE METHOD OR OTHER METHOD

(PL. SPECIFY) - IF NO, PLEASE SPECIFY METHOD

OF ZSP CHECK AND CALIBRATION.

B.6.2 PORTABLE KITS

- FREQUENCY OF CALIBRATION OF ROTAMETERS

- REAGENT STRENTH CROSS CHECK DONE.

B.7 TOXIC GAS MONITORS

- FREQUENCY OF CALIBERATION (PL LIST ALL MONITORS)

C. NOISE ENVIRONMENT C.1 FREQUENCY OF NOISE SURVEY

WEEKLY/MONTHLY/QTRLY

C.2 HIGH NOISE AREAS IDENTIFIED IF SO, PLEASE GIVE DETAILS

C.3 LIST INPLANT NOISE SURVEY RESULTS LOCATIONWISE (ATTACH TABLE)

15

C.4 DOES ANY EMPLOYEE GET EXPOSED TO

NOISE BEYOND OSHA NORM GIVEN BELOW 90 DBA - 8 HRS. 95 DBA - 4 HRS. 97 DBA - 2 HRS. 100 DBA - 1 HRS. 106 DBA - 15 MIN. 115 DBA - 2 MIN.

C.5 IF YES, ACTION PLAN FOR MITIGATION

C.6 COMPLIANCE OF STANDAD AS PER THE NOISE POLLUTION (REGULATION AND CONTROL) RULES 2000 PLEASE ATTACH POINT WISE NOISE

SURVEY DETAILS FOR MONITORING POINT ALONG BOUNDARY WALL

D. LAND ENVIRONMENT: D.1 SLUDGE ENVENTORY

D.1.1 QUANTITY OF RAW OILY SLUDGE GENERATED FROM CRUDE TANK BOTTOM, MT/YR PRODUCT TANK BOTTOM, MT/YR ETP FACILITIES, MT/YR OTHER (PLS. LIST) TOTAL

D.1.2. AVERAGE QUALITY OF RAW OILY SLUDGE CRUDE TANK BOTTOM : OIL % WT WATER, % WT SEDIMENTS, % WT

D.1.3 QUANTITY OF WET CHEMICAL SLUDGE GENERATED FROM - ETP, MT/YR - WATER TREATMENT, MT/YR

- OTHERS (PLS,LIST) - TOTAL

D.1.4 QUANTITY OF WET BIOLOGICAL SLUDGE

16

GENERATED FROM - ETP,MT/YR

- TOWNSHIP SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT MT/YR

- TOTAL MT/YR D.1.5 QUANTITY OF ACCUMULATED SLUDGE FOR

DISPOSAL :

- RAW OILY SLUDGE - CHEMICAL SLUDGE - BIOLOGICAL SLUDGE - TOTAL

CONSENT/ DESIGN

ACTUAL REMARKS

D.2 SLUDGE MINIMISATION AND TREATMENT : D.2.1 TOTAL NO. OF CRUDE TANKS

NO. OF TANKS HAVING HOT GAS OIL CIRCULATION FACILITY ATTACH TANK WISE DETAILS NO. OF TANKS CLEANED DURING THE PAST TWO YEARS ATTACH TANK WISE DETAILS

D.2.2 SIDE ENTRY MIXER (SEM) IN CRUDE TANK NO. OF TANKS PROVIDED WITH SEM/AMG;E SEM / SWIVEL ANGLE SEM ATTACH TANK WISE DETAILS WHETHER REGULAR OPERATION OF SEM DONE AVG, RATE OF SLUDGE BUILD UP IN CRUDE TANKS, CM/YR ATTACH TANK WISE DETAILS

DESING ACTUAL REMARKS

D.2.3 MELTING PIT FACILITY: WHETHER ADEQUATE MELTING PIT FACILITY FOR RAW OILY SLUDGE EXISTS WHETHER ADEQUATE DRYING BED FACILITY FOR CHEMICAL AND BIO-SLUDGE EXISTS OTHER FACILITY FOR SLUDGE MINIMISATION AND TREATMENT ATTACH DETAILS

17

D.3 SLUDGE STORAGE AS PER HAZARDOUS WASTE (MANAGEMENT & HANDLING INCLUDING AMENDMENT RULES 2000 – NO. 13 OF JUNE, 2000): WHETHER STORAGE FACILITY IS LINED WITH IMPERVIOUS LINER WHETHER LEACHATE COLLECTION FACILITY IS AVAILABLE WHETHER LEACHATE TREATMENT FACILITY IS AVAILABLE WHETHER RUNOFFS FROM STORAGE POND/LAGOONS IS TAKEN BACK TO ETP WHETHER GROUND WATER MONITORING FACILITY EXISTS AROUND SLUDGE DUMPING AREA IF YES, FREQENCY OF GROUND WATER MONITORING

D.4 INVENTORY OF SLUDGE DISPOSAL AS PER HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT & HANDLING INCLUDIN AMENDMENT RULES 2000 – NO. 13 OF JUNE, 2000): QUANTITY OF TREATED OILYSLUDGE GENERATED FOR FINAL DISPOSAL, MT/YR QUALITY OF TREATED OILY SLUDGE BEFORE FINALDISPOSAL (OIL, WATER & SEDIMENTS % WT) QUANTITY OF TREATED CHEMICAL SLUDGE GENERATED FOR FINAL DISPOSAL, MT/YR QUALITY OF TREATED CHEMICAL SLUDGE BEFORE FINAL DISPOSAL (OIL,WATER & SEDIMENTS % WT) QUALITY OF TREATED BIO SLUDGEGENERATED FOR FINAL DISPOSAL MT/YR QUALITY OF TREATED BIO SLUDGE BEFORE FINAL DISPOSAL (OIL,WATER & SEDIMENTS % WT) TOXIC METAL CONTENT ANALYSIS OF ABOVE SLUDGES AVIALBLE ATTACH THE SLUDGE WISE ANALYSIS IN DETAILS

CONSENT/ DESING

ACTUAL REMARKS

D.5 MODE OF DISPOSAL AS PER HAZARDOUS WASTE (MANAGEMENT &

18

HANDLING INCLUDING AMENDMENRUL 2000 – NO. 13 OF JUNE, 2000) DISPOSAL THROUGH LAND FILL MT/YR DISPOSAL IN LINED PITS MT/YR DISPOSAL OF BIO SLUDGE IN GREEN BELT AREAS MT/YR GOUND WATER MONITORING FACILITY AROUND SLUDGE DISPOSAL AREAS EXIST YES/NO

D.6 SPENT CATALYST GIVE SOURCE WISE DETAILS OF QUANTITY AND QUALITY FCCU HCU KHDS.ETC. ANY OTHER GIVE DETAILS OF STORAGE AND DISPOSAL

CONSENT/ DESIGN

ACTUAL REMARKS

D.7 LIST OF HAZARDOUS CHEMICALS AS NOTIFIED UNDER MANUFACTURE, STORAGE, AND IMPORT OF HAZARDOUS CHEMICALS RULES

D.7.1 GIVE DETAILS OF STORAGE FACILITIES AND METHOD OF DISCPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS CHEMICALS

D.8. STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF BATTERIES MANAGEMENT AND HANDLING RULES 2001

D.9 COMPLIANCE OF STANDARDS / CONSENT / AUTHORISATION AUTHORISATION OBTAINED FROM SPCB FOR STORAGE, HANDLING & DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS WASTES

D.10 SLOP SYSTEM AVG. SLOP GENERATION, MT/MONTH FROM ETP SEPARATOR

19

FROM OTHER FACILITES FROM OIL SEPARATORS, SUMPS ETC. FROM SLUDGE MELTING PITS FROM LSHS MELTING PITS FROM HOT GAS OIL CIRCULATION FROM BLOWDOWN OF COKE CHAMBER FROM CBD SYSTEM OTHER SOURCES (PLEASE LIST) GIVE DETAILS OF SLOP HANDLING, STORAGE AND DISPOSAL

E. OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY E.1 WHETHER WORK ENVIRONMENT MONITORING

DONE AS PER OISD STANDARD 166

E.2 WHETHER MEDICAL CHECKUP AS PER OISD STANDARD 166 DONE

E.3 WHETHER RECORD KEEPING OF HEALTH REPORTS OF THE EMPLOYEES IS DONE

E.4 WHETHER FACILITIES FOR OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH MONITORING ARE AVAILABLE IN MEDICAL HEALTH CENTRE

E.5 NUMBER OF PERSONS FOUND EFFECTED WITH THE OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH HAZARD

E.6 MITIGATION / PREVENTIVE MEASURES TAKEN TO SAFEGUARD EMPLOYEES

E.7 WHETHER PROPER TRAINING IS PROVIDED TO EMPLOYEES FOR ACTIVITIES RELATED TO OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH

E.8 INSTANCES OF EXCEEDENCE OF STEL AND OR TLV OBSERVED FOR ANY TOXIC SUBSTANCE

E.9 MEASURES TAKEN TO AVOID SUCH EXCEEDANCE IN FUTURE

E.10 ATTACH RESULTS AFTER CORRECTIVE ACTION

F. ENVIRONMENTAL AWARENESS AMONGST EMPLOYEES

F.1 ENVIRONMENTAL AWARENESS MEASURES

20

UNDERTAKEN BY INDUSTRY PL. ATTACH A BRIEF WRITE UP WHICH MAY COVER FOLLOWING.

- TRAINING PROGRAMME/WORKSHOPS - THROUGH BROCHURE, HOUSE JOURNAL

ETC. - OTHER MEDIA & TECHNIQUES

G. GREEN BELT DEVELOPMENT

G.1 WIDTH OF GREEN BELT

CONSENT ACTUAL REMARKS

G.2 GREEN BELT DESIGN BASED ON DETAILED STUDY (ATTACH REPORT)

G.3 PLANTATION FOR GREEN BELT COMPLETED YES / NO IF NO THEN PERCENTAGE COMPLETED

G.4 NO. OF TREES PLANTED IN LAST TWO YEARS IN GREEN BELT AREA IN OTHER AREAS PERCENTAGE OF THEIR SURVIVAL

G.5 CONCENTRATION OF HYDROCARBON AND SULPHUR DIOXIDE IN GREEN BELT AREA MICROGRAM /M3 OUTSIDE GREEN BELT AREA, MICROGRAM /M3

H. RECORD KEEPING AND MIS

H.1 WHETHER ALL THE STIPULATIONS MADE BY MOEF / SPCB WHILE ACCORDING ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE ARE COMPLIED

CONSENT ACTUAL REMARKS

H.2 WHETHER RECORD OF COMPLIANCE OF ALL THE STIUPLATED CONDITIONS IS AVAILABLE

H.3 ANY NON COMPLIANCE NOTICE RECEIVED BY THE COMPANY FROM THE REGULATORY AUTHORITIES

H.4 IF YES WHAT MEASURES TAKEN BY THE COMPANY TO COMPLY THE STIPULATIONS

H.5 WHETHER PERIODICAL REPORTS OF ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS ARE SENT TO REGULATORY AUTHORITIES AS PER THE STIPULATIONS.

21

H.6 WHETHER PROPER RECORDS OF ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS ARE MAINTAINED

H.7 DEVELOPMENTAL ACTIVITIES DONE ON ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT / POLLUTION CONTROL. SCHEMES ISSUED / IMPLEMENTED AND BENEFITS DERIVED.

22

ANNEXURE – II

CHECK-LIST FOR

ENVIRONMENTAL AUDIT FOR DOWNSTREAM PETROLEUM SECTOR

(Data if to be filled by Pipelines / Marketing

Terminals wherever and whichever is applicable for their facilities) NAME OF THE UNIT / FACILITY ------------------------ TYPE OF THE UNIT / FACILITY Pipelines/ Marketing Terminal AUDIT FOR THE YEAR ------------------------ DESIGN CAPACITY FOR THE AUDITED YEAR ------------------------ ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT ------------------------ SUBMITTED TO STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD FOR THE YEAR PART A : WATER ENVIRONMENT

A.1 RAW WATER INVENTORY

DESIGN NORMS

ACTUAL REMAKRS

A.1.1 RAW WATER SOURCE River / Municipal / Borewell

A.1.2. RAW WATER INTAKE, M3/HR (MINM) (MAX) (AVG.) (DESIGN)

A.1.3

RAW WATER BALANCE

- INTAKE M3/HR - OUTPUT MR/HR - (% AGE OF INTAKE) - BLOW DOWN & LOSSES M3/HR (% AGE OF INTAKE)

Please attach a chart for water balance.

DESIGN NORMS

ACTUAL REMARKS

A.1.4 TREATED WATER DISTRIBUTION DESIGN ACTUAL REMARKS

23

- FOR PLANT AND FACILITIES M3/HR

- DRINKING WATER M3/HR - FIRE WATER MAKE UP M3/HR - OTHERS (SPECIFY) M3/HR - LOSSES M3/HR

A.2

EFFLUENT INVENTORY

A.2.1 QUANTITY GENERATED, M3/HR (DRY WEATHER FLOW) MIN MAX. AVG.

A.2.1.1 PLANT WISE BREAK UP (AVG.) DRY WEATHER FLOW) - TANK FARM -OM&S FLOOR WASHINGS SANITARY EFFLUENT

- FROM PLANT - FROM TOWNSHIP (IF ANY)

OTHERS (PLS. SPECIFY) TOTAL QUANTITY M3/HR

A.2.2 DETAILS OF EFFLUENT TREATMENT FACILITIES / OIL WATER SEPARATOR FACILITIES WITH WRITE UP AND FLOW DIAGRAM

DESIGN ACTUAL OPERATIONS

REMARKS

A.2.3 ETP PERFORMANCE (AVG.QUALITY,MG/LT)

QUALITY AT INLET TO ETP QUALITY OF EFFLUENT AT FINAL OUTLET CONSENT REQUIREMENTS ANY DEVIATIONS WITH RESPECT TO CONSENT “*” DENOTES “In PPM

PH OIL* SULPHIDE* PHENOL*

BOD* TSS*

A.2.4 QUALITY ASSURANCE OF MONITORED DATA FOR PARAMETERS AS PER

METHOD PRESCRIBED

OF TESTING ACTUALS /

REMARKS

24

CONSENT

REQUENCY OF QA CHECKS*

A.2.5 TREATED EFFLUENT DISCHARGE POINT

CONSENT/ DESIGN

ACTUAL REMARKS

A.2.6 TOWNSHIP EFFLUENT DISCHARGE POINT

DESIGN ACTUAL REMARKS

A.2.7 STORM WATER DISCHARGE POINT DESIGN ACTUAL REMARKS

A.2.8 QUALITY OF RECEIVING WATER BODY UPSTREAM OF DISCHARGE POINT DOWNSTREAM OF DISCHARGE POINT (INCLUDE PARAMETERS AS PER NOTIFICATION GSR 422(E) DATED 19.5.93

A.3 COMPLIANCE OF STANDARDS / CONSENT

A.3.1 CONSENT FOR EFFLUENTDISCH. VALID TILL

A.3.2 EFFLUENT DISCHARGE QUANTITY M3/HR

AS PER CONSENT

ACTUAL REMARKS

A.3.4 NO. OF DAYS OF NON-COMPLIANCE AND REASONS FOR SAME

A.3.5 CORRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN

A.3.6 RESULTS AFTER CORRECTIVE ACTION

A.4 DETAILS OF STORM WATER COLLECTION SYSTEM

B. AIR ENVIRONMENT

B.1 CONSENT CONDITIONS OF SPCB / MOEF AND ITS VALIDITY

AS PER CONSENT

ACTUAL REMARKS

B.3 FUGITIVE EMISSION

B.3.1 WHETHER FUGITIVE EMISSION SURVEY HAS BEEN CARRIED OUT ATTACH SOURCE WISE FUGITIVE EMISSION SURVEY RESULTS

B.3.2

WHETHER INSTRUMENTS ARE AVAILABLE

B.3.3 CORRECTIVE ACTIONS INITIATED

25

B.3.4 RESULTS AFTER CORRECTIONS

B.3.5 WHETHER TANK SEALS CONDITIONS ARE CHECKED REGULARLY ATTACH TANK WISE SEAL CONDITION DETAILS

B.3.6 WHETHER MECHANICAL SEALS CONDITIONS ARE CHECKED REGULARLY

B.3.7 WHETHER COMPRESSER SEAL OIL DRAINING / RECLAMATION CARRIED OUT PROPERLY.

B.3.8 HOW MANY SEALS IN EACH CASE ARE NOT WORKING

B.3.9 WHAT CPRRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN FOR IMPROVING SEAL CONDITION

B.3.10 WHETHER ALL SRV’s ARE CONNECTED TO FLARE

B.3.11 WHETHER TANK BREATHER VALVE MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE IS AVAILABLE

B.3.12 WHETHR LIGHT PRODUCTS INCLUDING HSD ARE STORED IN FLOATING ROOF TANKS

B.3.13 WHETHER FUGITIVE EMISSION SURVEY IS CARRIED OUT FOR

- SAMPLING POINTS, - WATER DRAINS FROM BULLETS /

SPHERES/ TANKS

B4 AMBIENT AIR QUALITY MONITORING

B.4.1 NO. OF AAQM STATIONS IN

OPERATION AS PER CONSENT (PLEASE INDICATE PARAMETERS TO BE MONITORED AS PER CONSENT)

AS PER CONSENT

AS PROVIDED

B. 4.2 LOCATION OF AAQM STATIONS BASED ON DISPERSION MODELING / SPCB RECOMMENDATIONS / OTHER CONSIDERATION

26

B.4.3 FREQUENCY OF MONITORING AT MANUAL STATIONS BIWEEKLY/WEEKLY/ FORTNIGHTLY / MONTHLY

B.4.4 METEOROLOGICAL MONITORINGS STATIONS AS PER CONSENT (INDICATE PARAMETERS BEING MONITORED AS PER CONSENT).

B.4.5 WHETHER AMBIENT AIR QUALITY MONITORING DONE IN HOUSE OR THROUGH A SEPARATE AGENCY

C. NOISE ENVIRONMENT

C.1 FREQUENCY OF NOISE SURVEY WEEKLY/MONTHLY/QTRLY

C.2 HIGH NOISE AREAS IDENTIFIED IF SO, PLEASE GIVE DETAILS

C.3 LIST INPLANT NOISE SURVEY RESULTS LOCATIONWISE (ATTACH TABLE)

C.4 DOES ANY EMPLOYEE GET EXPOSED TO NOISE BEYOND OSHA NORM GIVEN BELOW 90 DBA - 8 HRS. 95 DBA - 4 HRS. 97 DBA - 2 HRS. 100 DBA - 1 HRS. 106 DBA - 15 MIN. 115 DBA - 2 MIN.

C.5 IF YES, ACTION PLAN FOR MITIGATION

C.6 COMPLIANCE OF STANDAD AS PER THE NOISE POLLUTION (REGULATION AND CONTROL) RULES 2000 PLEASE ATTACH POINT WISE NOISE SURVEY DETAILS FOR MONITORING POINT ALONG BOUNDARY WALL

27

D. LAND ENVIRONMENT: D.1 SLUDGE ENVENTORY

D.1.1 QUANTITY OF OILY SLUDGE GENERATED FROM : CRUDE TANK BOTTOM, MT/YR PRODUCT TANK BOTTOM, MT/YR ETP FACILITIES, MT/YR OTHER (PLS. LIST) TOTAL

D.1.2. AVERAGE QUALITY OF OILY SLUDGE CRUDE TANK BOTTOM : OIL & % WT WATER, % WT SEDIMENTS, % WT

D.1.3 QUANTITY OF ACCUMULATED OILY SLUDGE FOR DISPOSAL :

CONSENT/ DESIGN

ACTUAL REMARKS

D.2 SLUDGE MINIMISATION AND TREATMENT :

D.2.1 TOTAL NO. OF CRUDE TANKS NO. OF TANKS HAVING HOT GAS OIL CIRCULATION FACILITY ATTACH TANK WISE DETAILS NO. OF TANKS CLEANED DURING THE PAST TWO YEARS ATTACH TANK WISE DETAILS

D.2.2 SIDE ENTRY MIXER (SEM) IN CRUDE TANK NO. OF TANKS PROVIDED WITH SEM/AMG;E SEM / SWIVEL ANGLE SEM ATTACH TANK WISE DETAILS WHETHER REGULAR OPERATION OF SEM DONE AVG, RATE OF SLUDGE BUILD UP IN CRUDE TANKS, CM/YR ATTACH TANK WISE DETAILS

DESING ACTUAL REMARKS

D.3 SLUDGE STORAGE AS PER HAZARDOUS

28

WASTE (MANAGEMENT & HANDLING INCLUDING AMENDMENT RULES 2000 – NO. 13 OF JUNE, 2000): WHETHER STORAGE FACILITY IS AS PER CONSENT. WHETHER GROUND WATER MONITORING FACILITY EXISTS AROUND SLUDGE DUMPING AREA IF YES, FREQENCY OF GROUND WATER MONITORING

D.4 INVENTORY OF SLUDGE DISPOSAL AS PER HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT& HANDLING INCLUDIN AMENDMENT RULES 2000 – NO. 13 OF JUNE, 2000): QUANTITY OF TREATED OILYSLUDGE GENERATED FOR FINAL DISPOSAL, MT/YR QUALITY OF TREATED OILY SLUDGE BEFORE FINALDISPOSAL (OIL, WATER & SEDIMENTS % WT)

CONSENT/ DESING

ACTUAL REMARKS

D.5 MODE OF DISPOSAL AS PER HAZARDOUS WASTE (MANAGEMENT & HANDLING INCLUDING AMENDMENRUL 2000 – NO. 13 OF JUNE, 2000) DISPOSAL THROUGH LAND FILL MT/YR DISPOSAL IN LINED PITS MT/YR GOUND WATER MONITORING FACILITY AROUND SLUDGE DISPOSAL AREAS EXIST YES/NO

D.6 LIST OF HAZARDOUS CHEMICALS AS NOTIFIED UNDER MANUFACTURE, STORAGE, AND IMPORT OF HAZARDOUS CHEMICALS RULES

D.6.1 GIVE DETAILS OF STORAGE FACILITIES AND METHOD OF DISCPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS CHEMICALS

D.7. STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF BATTERIES MANAGEMENT AND HANDLING RULES 2001

D.8 COMPLIANCE OF STANDARDS / CONSENT / AUTHORISATION

29

AUTHORISATION OBTAINED FROM SPCB FOR STORAGE, HANDLING & DISPOSAL OFHAZARDOUS WASTES

D.9 SLOP SYSTEM AVG. SLOP GENERATION, MT/MONTH FROM ETP SEPARATOR FROM OTHER FACILITES GIVE DETAILS OF SLOP HANDLING, STORAGE AND DISPOSAL

E. OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY E.1 WHETHER WORK ENVIRONMENT

MONITORING DONE AS PER OISD STANDARD 166

E.2 WHETHER MEDICAL CHECKUP AS PER OISD STANDARD 166 DONE

E.3 WHETHER RECORD KEEPING OF HEALTH REPORTS OF THE EMPLOYEES IS DONE

E.4 NUMBER OF PERSONS FOUND EFFECTED WITH THE OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH HAZARD

E.5 MITIGATION / PREVENTIVE MEASURES TAKEN TO SAFEGUARD EMPLOYEES

E.6 WHETHER PROPER TRAINING IS PROVIDED TO EMPLOYEES FOR ACTIVITIES RELATED TO OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH

E.7 INSTANCES OF EXCEEDENCE OF STEL AND OR TLV OBSERVED FOR ANY TOXIC SUBSTANCE

E.8 MEASURES TAKEN TO AVOID SUCH EXCEEDANCE IN FUTURE

E.9 ATTACH RESULTS AFTER CORRECTIVE ACTION

F. ENVIRONMENTAL AWARENESS AMONGST EMPLOYEES

F.1 ENVIRONMENTAL AWARENESS MEASURES UNDERTAKEN BY INDUSTRY PL. ATTACH A BRIEF WRITE UP WHICH MAY COVER FOLLOWING.

- TRAINING PROGRAMME/WORKSHOPS - THROUGH BROCHURE, HOUSE

JOURNAL ETC. - OTHER MEDIA & TECHNIQUES

G. GREEN BELT DEVELOPMENT G.1 WHETHER ANY GREEN BELT REQUIREMENT

IS SPECIFIED IN CONSENT LETTER FROM

30

SPCB/MOEF. IF YES WIDTH OF GREEN BELT NO. OF TREEN PLANTED IN LAST TWO YEARS % AGE OF THEIR SURVIVAL

G.4 CONCENTRATION OF HYDROCARBON IN GREEN BELT AREA MICROGRAM /M3 OUTSIDE GREEN BELT AREA, MICROGRAM /M3

H. RECORD KEEPING AND MIS H.1 WHETHER ALL THE STIPULATIONS MADE BY

MOEF / SPCB WHILE ACCORDING ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE ARE COMPLIED

CONSENT ACTUAL REMARKS

H.2 WHETHER RECORD OF COMPLIANCE OF ALL THE STIUPLATED CONDITIONS IS AVIALBLE

H.3 ANY NON COMPLIANCE NOTICE RECEIVED BY THE COMPANY FROM THE REGULATORY AUTHORITIES

H.4 IF YES WHAT MEASURES TAKEN BY THE COMPANY TO COMPLY THE STIPULATIONS

H.5 WHETHER PERIODICAL REPORTS OF ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS ARE SENT TO REGULATORY AUTHORITIES AS PER THE STIPULATIONS.

H.6 WHETHER PROPER RECORDS OF ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS ARE MAINTAINED

H.7 DEVELOPMENTAL ACTIVITIES DONE ON ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT / POLLUTION CONTROL. SCHEMES ISSUED / IMPLEMENTED AND BENEFITS DERIVED.