3
Oil and Gas Major Successfully Splits into Upstream and Downstream Businesses Business Scenario The oil and gas (O&G) industry today is witnessing paradigm shifts in the global value chain, from supply, demand and infrastructure, through business economics and the competi- tive landscape. This is creating an environment for realignment and repositioning, resulting in greater acquisition and spin-off activity. Integrated oil and gas companies, as part of strengthening their operating models, often consider separating their upstream and midstream/downstream operations, to realize tighter control on costs and a reduction in risks. Shareholder alignment has also enabled these companies to chart a course toward becoming stand-alone entities with clear, separate operations. Client Situation Such was the case with one of our leading O&G clients, which wanted to separate its upstream and downstream segments into stand-alone companies. In 2011, the company announced its decision to spin off its refining and pipeline business from its exploration and production business to create two independent organiza- tions. Challenges As part of the spin-off, the company faced the following business challenges in separating its IT assets: Extremely tight timelines. The legal separation needed to be completed within 20 weeks of the announcement. A need for strong coordination with the stake- holders from the upstream and downstream businesses during the separation phase. Requirement for a disciplined and dedicated program management approach, as well as related tools and frameworks. The ability to address large-scale contrac- tual implications, resulting from the split of hardware, software and vendor contracts. The need to orchestrate communication among stakeholders from the upstream and downstream businesses. Resistance to change and other organiza- tional challenges brought about by a “people- focused” rather than a “process-focused” culture. Cognizant Case Study cognizant case study | may 2012

Oil and Gas Major Successfully Splits into Upstream … · Oil and Gas Major Successfully Splits into Upstream and Downstream Businesses . Business Scenario. The oil and gas (O&G)

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Oil and Gas Major Successfully Splits into Upstream … · Oil and Gas Major Successfully Splits into Upstream and Downstream Businesses . Business Scenario. The oil and gas (O&G)

Oil and Gas Major Successfully Splits into Upstream and Downstream Businesses

Business ScenarioThe oil and gas (O&G) industry today is witnessing paradigm shifts in the global value chain, from supply, demand and infrastructure, through business economics and the competi-tive landscape. This is creating an environment for realignment and repositioning, resulting in greater acquisition and spin-off activity.

Integrated oil and gas companies, as part of strengthening their operating models, often consider separating their upstream and midstream/downstream operations, to realize tighter control on costs and a reduction in risks. Shareholder alignment has also enabled these companies to chart a course toward becoming stand-alone entities with clear, separate operations.

Client SituationSuch was the case with one of our leading O&G clients, which wanted to separate its upstream and downstream segments into stand-alone companies. In 2011, the company announced its decision to spin off its refining and pipeline business from its exploration and production business to create two independent organiza-tions.

Challenges As part of the spin-off, the company faced the following business challenges in separating its IT assets:

• Extremely tight timelines. The legal separation needed to be completed within 20 weeks of the announcement.

• A need for strong coordination with the stake-holders from the upstream and downstream businesses during the separation phase.

• Requirement for a disciplined and dedicated program management approach, as well as related tools and frameworks.

• The ability to address large-scale contrac-tual implications, resulting from the split of hardware, software and vendor contracts.

• The need to orchestrate communication among stakeholders from the upstream and downstream businesses.

• Resistance to change and other organiza-tional challenges brought about by a “people-focused” rather than a “process-focused” culture.

• Cognizant Case Study

cognizant case study | may 2012

Page 2: Oil and Gas Major Successfully Splits into Upstream … · Oil and Gas Major Successfully Splits into Upstream and Downstream Businesses . Business Scenario. The oil and gas (O&G)

cognizant 20-20 insights 2

SolutionOur client engaged with us to provide guidance and advice in executing the IT separation program by bringing in the necessary skills, expertise and tool sets to achieve large-scale business transfor-mation.

Our customized program management approach tightly aligned multiple stakeholders from business and IT to successfully split off related activities and provide a holistic view of the program’s progress against objectives to facilitate timely intervention by management.

To accomplish this, we focused on three key elements:

1. Stakeholder management: Identify the relevant people and plan their involvement.

> Stakeholder identification: Sessions to identify who will need to be involved and how to contact them.

> Workshop planning: Identify the appropri-ate resources for the different workshops.

> Issue management: Identify issues related to stakeholders.

2. Governance and control: Understand the appropriate style of the program and the impli-cations on key processes.

> Governance: Agree on structure, lines of sight, cadence and “loose/tight” model.

> Control: RACI, spans of control, account-ability training, reporting format, approach and style.

> PMO: Establish the infrastructure, process-es and tools for an effective PMO.

3. Project planning: Obtain a clear view of the project’s in-scope and out-of-scope activities.

> Risks, issues and assumptions: Identifica-tion and discussion of risks, issues and as-sumptions.

> Scope management: Sessions to define scope.

> Dependency mapping: Mapping deliver-ables across workstreams, according to de-pendencies.

> Planning: Creating an integrated plan.

We have been repeatedly recognized as identi-fying with our client’s culture and being able to drive progress within the confines of the culture.

Benefits

• Successful on-time completion and smooth execution of the separation activities in a record time of 20 weeks.

• Greater transparency in separation processes and visibility into our progress to top management.

• Better coordination among various stake-holders from the upstream and downstream businesses.

• Reduced resistance to change and newer advice and ideas.

• Proactive monitoring of issues, risks and dependencies, which helped our client obtain visibility and effectively manage the program against the plan.

• Project assurance by implementing an inde-pendent challenge and assurance function that helped identify and resolve key issues of common concern across the project and support individual projects.

• Governance and organization by ensuring projects were properly set up for success and benefits were clearly articulated. Imple-mented a mechanism to effectively govern the program and drive it toward success in areas like reporting, meetings, change management, dependency management, etc.

• Benefits management by planning and tracking the delivery of benefits arising from

Scope of PMO Services

Divestiture ITProgram

Management

Issue

ManagementRiskManagement

Program

Managem

ent

Reso

urce

Man

agem

ent

Dependencies

Management

ManagementReporting

Figure 1

Page 3: Oil and Gas Major Successfully Splits into Upstream … · Oil and Gas Major Successfully Splits into Upstream and Downstream Businesses . Business Scenario. The oil and gas (O&G)

About Cognizant

Cognizant (NASDAQ: CTSH) is a leading provider of information technology, consulting, and business process out-sourcing services, dedicated to helping the world’s leading companies build stronger businesses. Headquartered in Teaneck, New Jersey (U.S.), Cognizant combines a passion for client satisfaction, technology innovation, deep industry and business process expertise, and a global, collaborative workforce that embodies the future of work. With over 50 delivery centers worldwide and approximately 137,700 employees as of December 31, 2011, Cognizant is a member of the NASDAQ-100, the S&P 500, the Forbes Global 2000, and the Fortune 500 and is ranked among the top performing and fastest growing companies in the world. Visit us online at www.cognizant.com or follow us on Twitter: Cognizant.

World Headquarters

500 Frank W. Burr Blvd.Teaneck, NJ 07666 USAPhone: +1 201 801 0233Fax: +1 201 801 0243Toll Free: +1 888 937 3277Email: [email protected]

European Headquarters

1 Kingdom StreetPaddington CentralLondon W2 6BDPhone: +44 (0) 20 7297 7600Fax: +44 (0) 20 7121 0102Email: [email protected]

India Operations Headquarters

#5/535, Old Mahabalipuram RoadOkkiyam Pettai, ThoraipakkamChennai, 600 096 IndiaPhone: +91 (0) 44 4209 6000Fax: +91 (0) 44 4209 6060Email: [email protected]

© Copyright 2012, Cognizant. All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the express written permission from Cognizant. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. All other trademarks mentioned herein are the property of their respective owners.

the project and ensuring that the investment in the project delivered the required return to the business.

• Reduction in redundant development and reusability of components across the program.

• In-house PMO toolkit, including various tools and templates based on best practices and past experiences (see Figure 2).

• Trusted and neutral partnering, offering advice on various aspects of the separation.

PMO Toolkit

Program Mobilization• Program and project charters• PMO runbooks• Resource planning and budgeting• Governance and TORs

Planning and Scheduling• MSP workstream and project plans• Mid-level program plans• High-level executive plans• Eight-week look-aheads

Dependency and Change Management• Dependency logs• Change control processes• Change control templates

Risk and Issues Management• Risk and issues (RAIDS) logs• Governance and escalation procedures

Reporting• Workstream status reports• Program-level status reports• Executive program dashboards

Figure 2