Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
O i f M i i lOverview of Municipal Market Conditions
American Association of Port Authorities (AAPA)(AAPA)
N b r 18 2008November 18, 2008
JoAnne CarterManaging Director
Public Financial Management4350 North Fairfax Drive, Suite 580
Arlington, VA 22203-1636703 741-0175 www.pfm.com
Credit Crunch: Part 1
• Florida suspends withdrawals from LGIP
• Structured Investment
• Florida suspends withdrawals from LGIP
• Structured Investment
• JP Morgan and Fed bail out Bear Stearns
• MBIA and AMBAC
• JP Morgan and Fed bail out Bear Stearns
• MBIA and AMBAC• Structured Investment defaults increase
• Structured Investment defaults increase
• MBIA and AMBAC downgraded
• MBIA and AMBAC downgraded
• State of Connecticut, C d th SEC
• State of Connecticut, C d th SECS l AAAS l AAA
March ‘08March ‘07 Sept ‘07
Congress, and the SEC take action against the rating agencies
Congress, and the SEC take action against the rating agencies
• Several AAA insurers placed on negative outlook
• Several AAA insurers placed on negative outlook
March 08March 07 Sept 07
Dec ‘06 June ‘07 Dec ‘07 June ‘08
• Subprime losses top $400 billion
• Subprime losses top $400 billion
• Housing market stalls
• Subprime loan
• Housing market stalls
• Subprime loan
• Fed cuts 125 bps in 10 days
• Fed cuts 125 bps in 10 days
$400 billion$400 billion• Auction Rate
Bonds begin to fail• Auction Rate
Bonds begin to fail • July 11th – Federal Regulators seize IndyMac bank, largest ever thrift to
• July 11th – Federal Regulators seize IndyMac bank, largest ever thrift to
2
delinquency rates spikedelinquency rates spike
fail in the USfail in the US
Credit Crunch: Part 2
• September 15th –• September 15th –• Week of September
29th – Wachovia • Week of September
29th – Wachovia
September 7thSeptember 7th
Lehman Brothers files for bankruptcyLehman Brothers files for bankruptcy
announces purchase by Wells Fargo (not Citigroup)
announces purchase by Wells Fargo (not Citigroup)
S t b 17thS t b 17th• September 7th –Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac placed into conservatorship
• September 7th –Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac placed into conservatorship
• September 17th –The Reserve fund “breaks the buck,” price at 97 cents at close of business
• September 17th –The Reserve fund “breaks the buck,” price at 97 cents at close of business
September ‘08
• September 17th –• September 17th –• September 10th –• September 10th – September 17Fed forces AIG into liquidation
September 17Fed forces AIG into liquidation
• September 14th –Bank of America announced
• September 14th –Bank of America announced
September 10Lehman puts itself up for sale
September 10Lehman puts itself up for sale
• September 29th –Dow plunges 9% ; U.S. House fails to
• September 29th –Dow plunges 9% ; U.S. House fails to
3
acquisition of Merrill Lynchacquisition of Merrill Lynch
pass bail-out planpass bail-out plan
Credit Crunch: Part 2 (con’t)
• October 7th – Federal Reserves creates CP Funding Facility to
• October 7th – Federal Reserves creates CP Funding Facility to
• October 29 th –Federal Reserves cuts 50 bps
• October 29 th –Federal Reserves cuts 50 bps
O t b 3rd DO t b 3rd D
Funding Facility to buy CP from eligible companies
Funding Facility to buy CP from eligible companies
• October 13th – US • October 13th – US
50 bps50 bps
• October 3rd – Dow closes down 818 points for the week, its worst week in 7 years
• October 3rd – Dow closes down 818 points for the week, its worst week in 7 years
announces plan to invest a portion of $700 billion facility in preferred stocks of US banks
announces plan to invest a portion of $700 billion facility in preferred stocks of US banks
October ‘08• October 7th – Fitch
and Moody’s defer recalibration of
• October 7th – Fitch and Moody’s defer recalibration of
• October 4th – President signs Emergency
• October 4th – President signs Emergency
recalibration of municipal ratingsrecalibration of municipal ratings
• October 8th –Federal Reserve cuts Fed Funds
• October 8th –Federal Reserve cuts Fed Funds
4
g g yEconomic Stabilization Act of 2008
g g yEconomic Stabilization Act of 2008
cuts Fed Funds target rate 50 bpscuts Fed Funds target rate 50 bps
Demise of Triple-A Bond Insurers
Moody’s S & P FitchAmbac Baa1 AA WithdrawnAmbac Baa1
Watch DevelopingAA
NegativeWithdrawn
Assured Guaranty1
AaaNegative Watch
AAAStable
AAAStable
Berkshire Hathaway
AaaStable
AAAStable
Not rated
CIFG B3 B WithdrawnWatch Developing Developing Watch
FGIC B1Negative
BBNegative Watch
CCCEvolving Watch
FSA1 AaaNegative Watch
AAANegative Watch
AAANegative Watch
MBIA Baa1 AA WithdrawnWatch Developing Negative
Syncora2 Caa1Watch Developing
BBB-Negative Watch
Withdrawn
5
Data as of 11/14/2008.1. Pending acquisition of FSA by Assured Guaranty, announced 11-14-08.2. Formerly XL Capital.
Reduction in Triple-A Insured Paper
Total Insured Volume (New Issuance)Total Insured Volume (New Issuance)
$112,589110,000
120,000
$122,589
$89,761
$101,550
$88,644
90,000
100,000
s
70,000
80,000
$ in
Mill
ion
$50,46050,000
60,000
$50,460
40,000 First Half 2006 Second Half 2006 First Half 2007 Second Half 2007 First Half 2008
6Source: The Bond Buyer.
Letter of Credit Activity
$13 2$14
Top LOC Providers $13.2
$10
$12
$14
$5.8$6
$8
$3.9 $3.9
$2.9$2.5
$1.8 $1.8 $1.8 $1.6$2.4 $2.3
$1.4$1.0 $1.2
$0 5$1.1
$2
$4
$0.4 $0.3 $0.5 $0.2$0
Th h 3 d Q 2008 F ll Y 2007
7
Through 3rd Quarter 2008 Full Year 2007Source: The Bond Buyer.(a) Firms were not ranked in Top 10 in 2007.
Change in MMD Triple-A Yield Curve
6%
MMD Triple-A Yield Curves
5%
11/14/2008
11/14/2007
4%
11/14/2006
2%
3%
Rate
1%
2%
0%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Years to Maturity
8Source: TM3, data as of 11/14/2008
Years to Maturity
Change in MMD Triple-A Yield Curve
Change in Triple-A MMD Yield Curve9/12/2008 to 10/02/2008
90
100
9/12/2008 to 10/02/2008
60
70
80
oint
s
40
50
60
hang
e in
Bas
is P
20
30
Ch
0
10
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Years to Maturity
9
Years to Maturity
Source: TM3, as of 11/14/2008.
Change in MMD Triple-A Yield Curve
Change in MMD Triple-A Yields9/12/2008 to 11/14/2008
60
80
40
ts
0
20
ge in
Bas
is P
oint
-20
01 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Cha
ng
-40
10Source: TM3, data as of 11/14/2008
-60Years to Maturity
Credit Spreads Widen
Revenue Spread vs. MMD Triple-A Benchmark(10 Year Maturity)
1.92%BBB
160
180
200( y)
1.11%120
140
nts
A
80
100
Bas
is P
oi
0.42% A
0.59% BBB
0.25%AA20
40
60
0.14% AA
A
0
11
Data shown from 11/14/2007 to 11/14/2008Source: TM3, as of 11/14/2008.
Date
AMT Spreads
Change in AMT Penalty 11/14/2007 - 11/14/2008
45
50
11/14/2007 11/14/2008
30
35
40
ints
20
25
30
Chan
ge in
Basis Poi
10
15
C
0
5
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
12
Years to Maturity
Source: TM3, as of 11/14/2008.
AMT Spreads
300
AMT Revenue Spread vs. Triple-A MMD Rates
250
2.67% BBB
200
oints
1.86% A
100
150
Basis Po
0.87% BBB
1.00%
50
0.42%
0.70% A
AA
0
AA
13Source: TM3, as of 11/14/2008.
Municipal Bond Rates vs. Treasury Rates
10 Year Treasury Rates vs. 25 Year Revenue Bond IndexOne Year History
6.00%
7.00%
One Year History6.48%
10/16/08
4.00%
5.00%5.09%9/11/08
2 00%
3.00%
10 Year
1.00%
2.00% 10 Year Treasury RBI
Maximum 4.230% 6.480%Minimum 3.340% 4.630%Average 3.849% 5.159%As of 11/14/08 3.860% 5.980%
0.00%
RBI 10 Y T
14
RBI 10 Year Treasury
Source: Bloomberg as of 11/14/2008.
Municipal Bond Rates vs. Treasury Rates
10 Year Treasury Rates vs. 25 Year Revenue Bond IndexSince Jan. 1, 1970
10 Year
14.0%
16.0%10 Year
Treasury RBIMaximum 15.750% 14.320%Minimum 3.180% 4.380%Average 7.428% 8.180%As of 11/14/08 3.860% 5.980%
10 0%
12.0%
8.0%
10.0%
4.0%
6.0%
2.0%
1/19
701/
1971
1/19
721/
1973
1/19
741/
1975
1/19
761/
1977
1/19
781/
1979
1/19
801/
1981
1/19
821/
1983
1/19
841/
1985
1/19
861/
1987
1/19
881/
1989
1/19
901/
1991
1/19
921/
1993
1/19
941/
1995
1/19
961/
1997
1/19
981/
1999
1/20
001/
2001
1/20
021/
2003
1/20
041/
2005
1/20
061/
2007
1/20
08
15
1/ 1/ 1/ 1/ 1/ 1/ 1/ 1/ 1/ 1/ 1/ 1/ 1/ 1/ 1/ 1/ 1/ 1/ 1/ 1/ 1/ 1/ 1/ 1/ 1/ 1/ 1/ 1/ 1/ 1/ 1/ 1/ 1/ 1/ 1/ 1/ 1/ 1/ 1/
10 Year Treasury RBISource: Bloomberg as of 11/14/2008.
Municipal Bond Issuance
National Average Total Volume Issued by Month(1999-2008)
$50
$60
$34
$40
ons
$18$22
$28$24
$28
$24 $24$22
$28 $27 $26
$20
$30
$ in
bill
io
$0
$10
$0January February March April May June July August September October November December
16Source: The Bond Buyer,
Average Monthly Volume Actual Volume 2008
Municipal Bond Issuance Volume
7.0Weekly Municipal Bond Issuance
$6.3 B
6.0
$6.3 B$6.7 B
AMT = $226.7 M
4.0
5.0
)
$4.6 B
3.0$'s in billions
$2.4 B $2.6 B
2.0 $1.7 B
$1.3 B
AMT = $26 M
0 0
1.0 AMT = $15 M
17
0.0
9/15/2008 9/22/2008 9/29/2008 10/6/2008 10/13/2008 10/20/2008 10/27/2008Source: TM3.
Port Issuance
2007Total = $4.6 billion
2008 YTDTotal = $3.2 billion
Variable Rate Volume46%
Fixed Rate Volume
Variable Rate Fixed Rate Volume46%Volume
54%Volume50%
50%
Insured Volume26%
Uninsured Volume23%
26%
Uninsured Volume74%
Insured Volume77%
18Source: TM3, as of 11/14/2008.
Outlook for Municipal Bond Transactions
Market conditions that began in September have led to significant pent-up municipal bond supply.
19,000
20,000 10/22/08$19.092 billion
17,000
18,000
s) 11/14/08
5-year History
Max $20 5($ in billions)15,000
16,000
$ (tho
usan
ds
/ 4/08$17.517 billion
10/1/08$14.638 billion
10/30/08Max $20.5Min $1.5Avg $10.2
13,000
14,000
10/9/08$13.768
10/30/08$15.111billion
12,000
$billion
19Source: TM3, as of 11/14/2008.
Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (SIFMA) Index vs 1 Month LIBOR(SIFMA) Index vs. 1-Month LIBOR9.00%
7.96%(9/26/08)
7.00%
8.00%
LIBOR: 4.59%5.00%
6.00%
10/10/08
3.00%
4.00%
1.00%
2.00% 1.48%11/14/08
1.14%(11/14/08)
0.00%
20Source: Bloomberg as of 11/14/2008.
Variable Rate History
SIFMA vs. 1-Month LIBOR(July, 1989 to Present)
8.00%
9.00%
10.00%
6.00%
7.00%
3.00%
4.00%
5.00%
1.00%
2.00%
0.00%
SIFMA 1 MONTH LIBOR
21
SIFMA 1‐MONTH LIBOR
Source: Bloomberg as of 11/14/2008.
Changes at Credit Agencies
• Municipal bonds default less often than corporate bonds
• Moody’s & Fitch proposing single rating scale for corporate & municipal bonds
• New approach would drive most public finance ratings upward, on average
O O t b 7 2008 M d ’ & Fit h l d lib ti f ti• On October 7, 2008, Moody’s & Fitch placed recalibration of ratings on hold due to market turmoil
22
Moody’s Global Scale Ratings
• Proposed single ratings scale (Global Scale Rating or “GSR”)
September 2008 Timeline*
(Global Scale Rating, or GSR ) across all sectors including municipal bonds
October 2008
• State GO & Related Ratings• 50 Largest Local Government Issuers
• Sector specific methodology to be published prior to each
i ti
November 2008
• Higher Education• Health Care
migration
• Representative credits will be recalibrated to set benchmarksDecember
• Housing• Airports• Ports• Toll Roads• Public Power recalibrated to set benchmarks
for transition processDecember
2008• Public Power• Mass Transit
• Local Government GO RatingsL l G t W t & S
January 2009
• Local Government Water & Sewer• State & Local Government Sales/Special Tax• All remaining credits
23* On October 7, 2008 Moody’s announced the GSR schedule will be postponed based on municipal market disruptions.
Fitch Exposure Draft
• Proposed recalibrating U.S. public finance ratings to be consistent with Fitch’s international rating scale
– On October 7, 2008, Fitch announced that they are postponing their recalibration efforts based on current market conditions and will re-revaluate in the first quarter of 2009
• Expect upward revisions of one to two notches on tax-supported bonds– Typically 2 notch increase if rated between BBB and A
– Typically 1 notch increase if rate between A+ and AATypically 1 notch increase if rate between A+ and AA
Expected General Obligation Ratings Shift
A+ and below
A+ and below14%
below42%AA and
AAA58%
AA and AAA86%
24Source: Fitch Ratings “Exposure Draft: Reassessment of Municipal Ratings Framework.” July 31, 2008.
Standard & Poor’s Ratings
• S&P has, in the past, and will continue to use, the same rating scale across the structured finance corporate and government sectorsacross the structured finance, corporate, and government sectors
• S&P reaffirmed their methodology in May 2008
R i d th U S P bli Fi it i i li ht f hi t i l d f lt• Reviewed the U.S. Public Finance criteria in light of historical default experiences
• In part due to these efforts the distribution of U S Public Finance• In part, due to these efforts, the distribution of U.S. Public Finance ratings have moved up the rating scale
• Placing a larger emphasis on management factors during rating g g p g g gprocess
25
Source: Standard & Poor’s “Standard & Poor’s Reaffirms Its Commitment to the Goal of Comparable Ratings Across Sectors and Outlines Related Actions.” May 6, 2008.
Additional Market Impact
• Equipment Financing
• Swaps
• Investment Contracts
• Public Private Partnerships
26
Questions?