Upload
jon
View
22
Download
3
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
OhioLINK : Transforming Information Access in Ohio Academic Libraries. THE. INFORMATION STRATEGY. Why the PEZ Strategy?. Historically – Libraries Ration Information We are Gatekeepers to limited information In The Future – Libraries must be Gateways - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
OhioLINK:Transforming Information Access in Ohio Academic Libraries
THE
INFORMATIONSTRATEGY
Why the PEZ Strategy?
• Historically – Libraries Ration Information
• We are Gatekeepers to limited information
• In The Future – Libraries must be Gateways
• We must be Gateways to much more information access
Historical PEZ Strategy
OhioLINK Future PEZ Strategy
Why OhioLINK– Rationale and
Philosophies
– Organization
– $$ Resources
– Services
“Few things are harder to put up with than a good example.” Mark Twain
“Ignorance is the mother of admiration.” George Chapman
The OhioLINK spark-
• Thus were born the five remote storage repositories…• and OhioLINK…• a legacy of the original Ohio College Library Center mission
• Mid-1980s --- universities out of stack space• Too expensive to build more standard stack space•No effective way to utilize the collections
Our Goal
• Economically sustainable, increased student and faculty access to and use of library provided information to support and improve instruction and research…as a consortium
• More information access is required to be relevant/successful
• Information resources are proliferating• Information costs are growing faster than individual
library budgets• Libraries remain compelled to buy as much as
possible• Individual libraries cannot leverage significantly
greater access on limited funds• Libraries DID NOT, DO NOT and WILL NOT have all the
information resources their patrons need
Because
“Learning is like rowing upstream; not to advance is to drop back.” Chinese Saying
• To gain Economic leverage– lowest unit prices, controlled costs– more information per $ spent– increased economic bargaining power
• To gain Information Access leverage– much, much more access
• To gain Operational leverage– maximize use of computer investment– Control, customize, and evolve access
to group needs
Objectives
E-W 360 km
N-S 370 km
• 106,765 sq km 35th in US
• Pop: 11.5 M 7th in US
• GDP: $373 Billion • lowest pt.132 m• highest pt. 473 m
MEMBERS• State Library• 49 private liberal arts
colleges• 23 public two-year colleges
• 1 standalone medical school (7 total med)
• 2 private universities
• 13 public universities
• Includes 9 law
•+499,000 FTE +130 primary delivery sites
FTE – 499,000
• 97,800 Independent • 113,300 Two-year• 33,300 University Br’s• 252,100 University M’s• 2,500 State Library (SLO FTE arbitrary)
• 152,900 2y Ugrad• 278,700 4y Ugrad• 11,500 Doctoral• 4,700 Law• 44,200 Masters• 7,000 Medical
OhioLINK Governance and Advisory Organization
Advisory Board Provosts. CIOs
Executive Director and staffTechnical AdvisoryCouncil
Library Advisory Council15 U, 3 IC, 3 CC, 2 M, 1 L, 1 SLO
Coop Information Resources Mgmt
User Services
Inter-Campus Services
Database Mgmt and Standards
Lead Implementers
Independent Colleges Library Directors
Community CollegesLibrary Directors
Med Lib Directors
Law Lib Directors
Chancellor of theOhio Board of Regents
Digital Resources Mgmt
Executive DirectorDirector - Library Systems
Ast Dir Lib Sys
Computing &Networking
Meta DataManager
Ast Dir Lib Sys
UserServices
Ast Dir Lib Sys
Client/ServerApplications
CommunicationsMgr
OfficeManager
Asst Developerr/ Office Asst
Sr SystemsEngineer
Sr Systems Engineer
OhioLINK Organizational Chart
Ast Dir Lib Sys
New Service
Sr. SystemsDeveloper
7/01/2008
SystemsDeveloper
7.5 MLS Librarians --- 7.5 non-MLS Eng/Dev --- 4.5 Admin/Other
SystemsDeveloper
Cap Fund $$Ast Dir
DRC Dev
Cap Fund $$Systems
Developer
SystemsEngineer
PT EJCSerial Check-
in Asst
OSUComputer
Center WSUAdminAgent
Ast Dir Lib Sys
E Licensing
Libraries Connect Ohio – Towards the Ohio Web Library
CommonInformation
NeedsK-12
HigherEducation
StateGovernment
PublicLibraries
OhioLINK Central Funding – 2 yr budgetsCapital funds
• FYs 89-92 $9.2 million
• FYs 93-94 $10.8 million
• FYs 95-96 $6.8 million
• FYs 97-98 $5.0 million
• FYs 99-00 $6.3 million
• FYs 01-02 $7.5 million
• FYs 03-04 $8.2 million
• FYs 05-06 $8.1 million
• FYs 07-08 $8.9 million
• FYs 09-10 $9.9 million
Operating Funds• FYs 90-91 $.4 million• FYs 92-93 $1.7 million• FYs 94-95 $4.4 million• FYs 96-97 $8.8 million• FYs 98-99 $11.5 million• FYs 00-01 $14.6 million• FYs 02-03 $14.2 million• FYs 04-05 $13.8 million• FYs 06-07 $13.8 million• FYs 08-09 $14.8 million• FYs 10-11 ???
Central Funding pays for:• All central staff and G&A expenses• All central hardware and software systems to
support statewide services• All central hardware and software maintenance• All ILL courier and bag/material costs• All initial Innovative systems for public
institutions plus RetroCon and Auth Control• Continuing III software and maintenance where
needed for statewide cooperation• Database license costs – in combination with
library funds
Leverage the Technology• Central Catalog - Patron-Initiated borrowing• Local load of Journal A& I databases with common
interface (and archives)• Single local site for statewide platforms
– Electronic Journal Center
– Electronic Book Center
– Electronic Theses and Dissertations
– Digital Resource Commons
• Central Federated Subject Cluster searches• Common Remote User Authentication• Olinks - journal resolver (home-grown SFX)
OhioLINK Array of Resources
On-siteElectronic
JournalCenter
On-Site ISI WoS
On Site DIGITAL RESOURCE COMMONSDocumentsImages dataaudio video
On-Site Journal Citation DB’s
On-site E-books & full text literature
Web DB’s vendor systems
On-SiteCENTRAL CATALOG
Ebsco
E-books vendor systems
ELECTRONIC JOURNALS
ELECTRONIC BOOKS
REFERENCE/RESEARCH DATABASES
On-Site E- Theses& Dissert.
Vendor im
ages
Video audio
Peer reviewed
publishing
Institutionaldocuments, videos and audio
Institutional images
OLinks
Chat Reference
Subject Clusters
Remote Authentication
$0
$2
$4
$6
$8
$10
$12
$14
F89-90 F1991 F 1992 F1993 F1994 F1995 F1996 F1997 F1998 F1999 F2000 F2001 F2002 F2003 F2004 F2005 F2006 F2007 F2008
Mill
ion
s
Use of OhioLINK CombinedOperating and Capital Expenditures
Content and Content Delivery
Local Library Technical & CatalogInfrastructure
Staff and Admin
Central Site Technical Infrastructure
Annual Operating and Capital Appropriationplus membership fee
Where does the money to license electronic content come from in
F2007/C2007?TOTAL OhioLINK Libraries
ALL Models $31,394,958 3.2% $7,519,819 3.4% $23,875,139 3.2%E Journal Center $26,063,733 3.5% $4,227,051 4.2% $21,836,682 3.3%Databases and other e-resourcesCentrally funded $798,718 3.0% $798,718 3.0% $0NPR model $879,798 2.4% $0 $879,798 2.4%War Chest model $3,652,708 1.7% $2,494,050 2.2% $1,158,659 0.6%
Cost Effective Purchasing Power
• Costs controlled with expanded 2x-
10x rather than diminished
content• Costs controlled
below market averages
Content Funding Models
• 100% Central
• Split central/library - multi-database War Chests or NPR
• Split central/library – single database War Chests or NPR
• Mostly library/some central – multi or single war chest or NPR
• 100% library war chests, NPR, or PTP
Questions/Discussion
“Let others praise ancient times, I am glad I was born in these.” Ovid