OFA 9.6

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/12/2019 OFA 9.6

    1/4FlowerTECH 2006, vol. 9/no. 62 www.HortiWorld.

    Fossil-fuel concern a

    Review

    The OFA event featured an attrac-tive mix of lectures combined with

    a trade show for the greenhouse

    industry; with 1,330 booths pre-

    senting 500 companies the trade show

    floor had something for everyone. And so

    did the educational sessions, which cov-

    ered a wide array of greenhouse-related

    issues, from production to marketing,

    while focusing on points of interest to gar-

    den centre owners, landscapers and florists

    alike. This combination, together with the

    trade show managed to attract around10,000 attendants from all US states and

    20 foreign countries.

    Sector backgroundThe greenhouse/ nursery industry is a con-

    siderable economic sector, estimated at

    $13.8 billion by the USDA Economic

    Research Service data (2001), correspon-

    ding to 6.8% of the value for all US com-

    modities. An important aspect to grasp

    about the American ornamental sector is

    its diversity; climates and consumer pref-erences vary considerably throughout this

    wide-ranging country. One common facto

    is that the majority of ornamental firms

    are family-owned or operated; the owner

    family members still play a major role as

    managers or workers. Perhaps surprisingl

    in the country of big-box stores such as

    Wall-Mart, ornamental greenhouses

    remain relatively small in acreage, with

    exceptions naturally.

    Unlike smaller countries with their cen-

    The OFA Short Course combination of educational sessions and trade show attracted around 10,000 attendants from all US states and 20 foreign countries.

    A traditional event in the north-American ornamental

    calendar, the 76th version of the Ohio Florist Association

    (OFA) Short Course took place from July 8-11, in

    Columbus, Ohio state, USA. Presentations on energy-related

    and cost analysis issues were often packed with growers

    eager to get answers to the challenges they are facing.

    By Mauricio C. Mathias

  • 8/12/2019 OFA 9.6

    2/4FlowerTECH 2006, vol. 9/no. 6www.HortiWorld.nl

    Review

    tralised research structure and long-term

    national goals for the sector as a whole,

    such as the Netherlands; or like Spain,

    whose greenhouse production is massively

    concentrated in one region, the US is larg-

    er than Europe, and has ornamental pro-

    duction in all of its 50 states. Even though

    some states may have a lead in certain

    areas due to specific circumstances, gar-

    den-centres and grower-owned flower

    shops are present in almost every town,

    and so is the production of bedding

    plants for home gardens. Hence theimportance of national sector meetings

    such as OFA, where growers can compare

    experiences and learn about successful

    solutions. In order to complete a picture

    of the ornamental sector in the US, it is

    understandable that as a consequence of

    the reasons above, problem-solving has

    traditionally been approached at the state

    level, rather than nationally. Typically, the

    universities research and extension staff

    look for solutions of problems afflicting

    growers in their own state.

    Energy hikeWith a variety of topics to choose from

    out of the 130 educational sessions at

    OFA, at least one issue had almost univer-

    sal appeal. The concern over fossil-fuel

    prices: a pervasive aspect of modern

    American society. As one watches the

    nightly television news, it revolves around

    the US troops in Iraq and Afghanistan and

    recording-breaking gas prices, while the

    commercial breaks depict the advantages

    of renewable ethanol, or more gas-effi-cient car models. Naturally, the green-

    house industry has had to forecast its

    future in this scenario. With the present

    fuel cost increase many growers have seen

    their margins shrink steadily, requiring a

    closer look to the accounting books.

    Understandably, presentations on ener-

    gy-related and cost analysis issues were

    often packed with growers eager to learn

    what specialists had to say about solutions

    to their common problems. Firstly, Figure

    1will give the reader an appreciation of

    how steeply gas prices have risen in the

    local market, according to Energy

    Information Agency (EIA) data. The EIA

    has the official US government energy sta-

    tistics, and its website is an endless source

    of American and worldwide energy facts

    and figures (www.eia.doe.gov).

    Thus, each presentation approached the

    issue from a different angle. From a grow-

    ers perspective, a lecture by Dr Erik

    Runckle from Michigan State University

    on strategies to cope with fuel cost out-

    lined 10 actions greenhouse growers can

    take in order to reduce costs but not profit

    (Table 1). (More information regarding green-

    house energy can be found at

    www.hrt.msu.edu/energy)Donald Bonk, from the US Department

    of Energy, presented the case from a

    broader national perspective, concerning

    the use of alternate fuels, made possible

    with the replacement of old boilers for co-

    fired ones, able to burn more than one

    kind of fuel. Optional fuels can be num-

    ber 1 and 2 oils, waste oils, or even energy

    sources that have already been phased out,

    such as town gas or coal. As one would

    expect, the final choice will depend on

    local availability (highly variable accord-

    ing to region), as well as cost and environ-

    mental issues. As one example, the price

    OFA short course

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    US$

    perth

    ousand

    cubicfeet,

    NaturalGas

    Source: EIA data

    1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005

    Figure 1. Inflation-adjusted commercial price for natural gas.

    1. Use a positive DIF and increase vent-heat dead-

    band; a cooler night with warmer day tempera-

    tures can consume less energy (at the same

    average), but growers should watch to specific

    crop responses such as stem extension.

    2. Install horizontal airflow fans (HAF); improves

    temperature uniformity.

    3. Start with larger/older plug; shorter finishing

    time.

    4. Efficient use of greenhouse space.5. Grow cold-tolerant and cold-sensitive crops sep-

    arately.

    6. Improve greenhouse insulation.

    7. Provide long days to long-day plants; at least

    until early April.

    8. Provide supplemental lighting to plugs.

    9. Use a retractable energy or shade curtain.

    10.Dont cheat on heat; crops grown cool require

    longer production time.

    Source: Dr Erik Runckle, Michigan State University

    Table 1. Ten actions to reduce costs, but notprofit.

  • 8/12/2019 OFA 9.6

    3/4FlowerTECH 2006, vol. 9/no. 64 www.HortiWorld.

    Review

    of coal that is com-

    pliant with envi-

    ronmental regula-

    tions (low in sulfur

    and CaCl) can cost

    up to US$150/ton

    as opposed to regu-

    lar coal at $50/ton.

    New fuel choices

    include synthetic

    gas or syngas,

    resulting from a

    gasification process using C- and H-rich

    materials such as biomass, or even

    asphalt. Possible green substitutes are

    fuel pellets made of compressed waste

    paper, hay or straw; also corn cobs, wood

    chips and agricultural manures have been

    adopted when feasible. Evidence points

    out that switching to low-cost, solid or

    waste fuel can result in return to invest-ment in two to four years.

    Payback time of 2.4 years was the result

    of a study by Dr Peter Ling, Ohio State

    University, who looked at the viability of a

    second curtain for further energy savings

    based on an actual case study, and project-

    ing oil prices for the 2007 heating season

    at US$2.22/gallon. He also instructed the

    audience regarding USDA grants and guar-

    anteed loans for renewable energy sys-

    tems, as well as for energy efficiency

    improvements. These could be added to

    state energy grants in some cases.

    Costing it outIn this changing environment where the

    EIA forecasted no fuel price drops expect-

    ed for 2007, production cost assessment

    was another popular subject for growers.

    John Dole and Brian Whipker, North

    Carolina State University, did a great job

    at showing growers practical ways to calcu-

    late their production costs to arrive at

    $/area/week for each crop. Since many

    growers have their peak season at spring,

    when homeowners plant their gardens,

    greenhouses frequently have a very high

    assortment of pots, flats and plugs.

    However, few growers look at individual

    crops as separate businesses and even

    fewer allocate labour hours or variable

    costs either. This contradiction betweenthe complexity of some operations and

    their high plant quality compared to the

    simplicity of the way some owners do

    their accounting can be astounding.

    Growers in the audience made jokes about

    colleagues who realise, they have a net

    loss in some products, but say they will

    make up on volume! Greenhouse owner

    Peter Konjoian was one of the lecturers at

    the Who Will Survive? presentation, and

    posed thought-provoking questions to his

    peers. As a manager he did his bench rev-

    enue analysis and concluded that cutting

    back on the size of his operation was the

    answer, instead of what he called the

    farmer mentality if you dont grow

    more, you fail.

    Trade show talkArgus, a Canadian climate control special

    ist, presented its latest release, Titan, a ne

    controller that is fully compatible with

    previous versions of Argus equipment,

    and also user-configurable. After 25 years

    in the market, Argus takes pride in having

    pioneered control options in the green-

    house Canadian market, such as system-

    wide data recording; and heat storage and

    buffering, among others. Its main compa

    ative advantage is the systems wide range

    of applications, which is made to fit to

    each clients needs. Due to its highly customized solutions, Argus is used by regu-

    lar commercial growers, but it was also th

    system of choice for a station on the

    South Pole, according to Alec Mackenzie

    Basically, if its got chlorophyll, you can

    call us. (www.arguscontrols.com)

    Sahin Zaden is a Dutch ornamental

    breeder supplying novelties, with a 2,000

    variety catalogue of seeds produced in 17

    different countries. At the companys 5-ha

    site in the Zeeland province their annuals

    Alec Mackenzie introduced the Argus Titan System.

    Erik Jansen of Sahin believes in

    bedding plants with dark foliage, such

    as their Juncus effusus spiralis.

    Natural ventilation is back again, now in the form of the increasingly popular retractable roof, replacing the

    more energy demanding fan-and-pad cooling.

  • 8/12/2019 OFA 9.6

    4/4FlowerTECH 2006, vol. 9/no. 6www.HortiWorld.nl

    Review

    can be viewed; the main crops are cut

    flowers such as helianthus, delphinium,

    carthamus and aster; plus kitchen herbs,

    medicinals, succulents, and organic seeds.

    Erik Jansen, account manager for Europe,

    explains that Sahins name may not be so

    well-known in the market, even though

    they started in 1982 because they are dis-

    tributed by brand names such as Yoder

    and Ecke. (www.sahin.nl)

    Sunarc, a Canadian company, launched

    its On-Demand Insulation and Shade

    System at the OFA show. By injecting liq-uid, insulating foam in between the dou-

    ble-layer polyplastic house covering, the

    system has achieved 50% energy savings

    in a winter trial in Quebec, according to

    an independent testing made by the Laval

    University. Sunarc invested CN$4.5 mil-

    lion over six years to develop the system,

    which works both as insulation at night

    (R-factor 15), as well as shading during

    the mid-day hours, thus saving both on

    heating and cooling demands. The on/off

    settings for the system can be incorporated

    in the climate control; the foam is main-

    tained while needed, being rinsed away

    with water sprinklers afterwards. Sunarcs

    president, Len April, is convinced that the

    timing is just right for the product given

    present energy prices. (www.sunarc.ca)Another product addressing the energy

    cost is the Airius thermal equaliser, a verti-

    cal fan driven by a low-wattage motor,

    which, once hung from the ceiling, forces

    a column of air downwards. The 33-cm

    apparatus is presented inside a tube-like

    casing which, according to design manag-

    er Scott Canby, creates a natural air move-

    ment that mixes colder and warmer air,

    achieving thermal equalisation within 24-

    hours inside a closed environment, on

    average. Subsequently, thermostats can be

    set higher in summer or lower in winter,

    in either regular buildings or greenhouses.

    Scott stresses that unlike standard ceiling

    fans that just swirl air around, the Airius

    drills air downwards in an air column.

    Available in six models, a further advan-tage for greenhouses is the elimination of

    cold corners, resulting in more uniform

    plant growth. (www.airius.us)

    [email protected]