Upload
others
View
13
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
LC Paper No. PWSC106/16-17(01)
發展局規割地政科
香港添馬添翼道二號
政府總部西翼十t樓
本局檔號 Ollr Ref.
來函檔號 YOllr Ref.
DEVB(PL-P) 50/01 /75
Ms Sharon CHUNG Legislative Council Secretariat Public Works Subcommittee Legislative Council Complex 1 Legislative Council Road Central, Hong Kong
Dear Ms Chung,
(Translation)
Planning and Lands Branch Development Bureau
17沛, West Wing Central Government Offices 2 Tim Mei A venue, Tamar
Hong Kong
電吉舌 Te1.: 3509 8810
傳真 Fax: 2868 4530
Bv Email
13 March 2017
Capital Works Reserve Fund Block Allocation
Enquiry from Hon CHU Hoi圓dick
on Individual Project (Kwu Tung North and Fanling North New Development Areas)
We refer to the letter dated 18 February 2017 addressed to the Chaitman of the Public Works Subcommittee from Hon CHU Hoi-dick seeking inforτnation on individual project under Capital Works Reserve Fund Block Allocation. As requested by the Chairman, we have coordinated information provided by the relevant bureaux/departments and the reply is as follows (in accordance with the order and numbering of the incoming letter) :
- 2-
(1) Funding Allocation Arrangement for Land Acquisition Costs in
respect of Kwu Tung North and Fanling North New Development
Areas (KTN and FLN NDAs)
Land acquisition costs incurred by public works are calculated
according to the mechanism approved by the Finance Committee (FC) and
payable under Head 701 of the Capital Works Reserve Fund (CWRF). In
accordance with the financial procedures, funding allocations 企omC兩位F for
block al1ocations, including the said expenditure on land acquisition costs
under Head 701 , shall be approved by FC in examining the Estimates of each
financial year. As the said costs are calculated according to the approved
mechanism and payable under Head 701 according to the established practice,
funding will be provided as mentioned above by following the general
financial procedures without having to seek separate funding approval. As
stated by the Government on the announcement of the North East New
Tenitories New Development Areas project in 2013, land resumption and
compensation costs fo1' KTN and FLN NDAs were estimated to exceed $30
billion in total. However, the scope of the Advance, First Stage and the
remaining works ofthese two NDAs, and the ac仙al area of and expenditure on
land resumption are pending confirmation. No detailed estimation by phases
of the costs is thus available.
(2) First Stage of Site Formation and Engineering Infrastructure at
KTN and FLN NDAs
As the KTN and FLN NDAs project spans a verγlarge area, the project
is expected to take more than ten years from commencement of the [11'st phase
to overall completion. To facilitate project management, we will carry out the
project in phases. The Govelnment will proceed with the development in order
of priority. The First Stage Works (Annex 1) is part of the first phase of the
NDAs development. Its scope comprises the following:
(i) Site formation works in designated areas; (ii) Development of the Long Val1ey Nature Park;
- 3 -
(iii) Provision of associated engineering infrastructure, including drainage, sewerage, waterwo1'ks, envi1'onmental mitigation measures, etc; and
(iv) Construction supervision.
The detailed design and site investigation for the First Stage Works was included in Category D of the Public Works Programme in June 2014, and commenced in November 2014. The Agreement number is CE 13/2014 (CE) (including Advance Works and First Stage Works) with AECOM Asia Company Limited as the Consultants.
(3) Purpose-built Complex of Residential Care Homes for the Elderly (RCHE) in KTN NDA
(a) Purpose-built RCHE Complex Project
For early completion of the RCHE Complex in Area 29 of KTN NDA, the Govelnment had brought forward its funding application for resumption of PI甘ate land and implementation of the associated site formation and infrastructure works, which was approved via Block Allocations under Capital Works Reserve Fund by the Finance Committee of the Legislative Council at its meeting on 19 March 2016. Fo1' the revised estimate of $360 million for “Land Resumption for Construction of the Purpose-built Complex of Residential Care Homes for the Elderly in Area 29 ofKwu Tung No1'th NDA", the Government anticipates that it will be paid in the 2016-17 finan.cial year.
Acco1'ding to the cunent project prograrnme, if the site formation and associated inf全部tructure works and the building works of the RCHE Complex are progressing smoothly, the Government would strive for completion of the RCHE Complex in 2022 for anticipated operation in 2023.
To cope with the Advance Works of KTN NDA, the existing RCHEs in Dills Corner Garden (DCG) would be cleared in two phases. The first phase is expected to be carried out at the end of 2018 while the second phase would be conducted afte1' the completion of the RCHE Complex. A few blocks in DCG would be affected by the fi1'st phase clearance including those cUlTently used as RCHEs. If necess訂y, we would modi命 the existing
- 4 -
non次CHE b10cks in DCG to RCHEs for accornmodation of the e1der1y
affected by the first phase clearance such that they do not need to move out
企om' DCG before the operation of the RCHE Comp1ex. Re1evant
departments wou1d closely discuss on how to time1y complete the project and
reduce the impact on the elderly in the RCHEs in DCG. We could only confirm
the timetable for the first phase clearance after approva1 of the Legislative
Counci1 on the funding application for the Advance Works of KTN NDA.
As indicated at the Legis1ative Council Pane1 on We1fare Services on
12 May 2014, in allocating the subsidised residentia1 care p1aces of the new
RCHE comp1ex, priority wou1d be given to e1igib1e existing residents at DCG
who have passed the care needs test under the Standardised Care Need
Assessment Mechanism for Elderly Services (SCNAMES) before its service
commencement. F or those residents who have not passed the care needs test
or not been assessed under SCNAMES by the time of service cornmencement,
the Socia1 We1fare Department will assist them in finding a1ternative
p1acements in other private RCHEs.
(b) Treatment of Arsenic-containing 80il in the 8ite of the RCHE
Complex
The arsenic in the soi1 at KTN NDA is naturally oCCUlTing. We had
already caITied out a HRA to ensure that the land 扭曲e NDA could be used
safe1y in future. According to the results of the ground investigation, the
arsenic concentrations of the soil samp1es collected at the shallow ground
region of the new RCHE Complex (within 4m below the site f01mation 1evel)
ranged 企om 4mg/kg to 1,200mg/kg. For those samp1es collected at deep
g1'ound (outside 4m be10w the site formation leve1), thei1' a1'senic
concentrations ranged from 1mg/kg to 3,680mg/kg. We wou1d carrγout
treatment for the soi1 with arsenic concentration greate1' than 571mg/kg in
accordance with the 1'ecornmendations of the HRA in the Environmenta1
Impact Assessment (EIA) Report.
Appendix 8.1 of the EIA Report fo1' the No1'th East New Territories
們ENT) NDAs mainly covers the treatment of the man-made contaminated
- 5 -
land while the treatment of the naturally occuning arsenic in soil should fo l1ow Appendix 8.4 of the EIA Report. For the pmpose-built RCHE Complex in Area 29 of KTN NDA, we had already submitted contamination assessment plan to Environmental Protection Department (EPD) in accordance with the requirements of the EIA Report. Based on the assessment results, there is no contaminated land-use / activities found at the RCHE Complex site.
The arsenic-containing soil at the RCHE Complex site is natu1'al1y occuning and is mainly originated from the Ash Crystal Tuff in the region, rather than arising 企om man-made contamination. In undertaking the NENT NDAs EIA, the Govemment had already canied out a HRA for the arsenic-containing soil in KTN to study its characteristics and develop suitable health risk baseline and con'esponding treatment method in order to ensure public safety.
For the HRA fo1' KTN NDA, we had already developed a suitable health risk baseline and co訂esponding treatment method according to the HRA method commonly used international1y. The baseline and treatment method were developed by assessing the proportions of arsenic entering the human body through different exposure pathways and referencing to the hygiene safety index of W or1d Health Organisation (明在10) and United States Environmental Protection Authority (USEP A). Based on the results of the HRA, the identified safety index is that solidification / stabilisation should be canied out for the soi1 with arsenic concentration greater than 571mg/kg in order to ensure public safety.
During consttuction stage, the contractors should use specific method to solidify the arsenic in the soil according to the recommendations ofthe HRA of the EIA Report in order to ensure that such arsenic would not affect the public health after completion of the development. We would implement appropriate mitigation measures based on the recommendations of the HRA of the EIA Repo此, which include provision of relevant training, equipment and materials to the workers. Masks, respiratory apparatus and personal protective equipment would also be provided to the workers where necessary.
- 6 -
(4) RCHE Complex in Kwu Tung, Ground Investigation Works in KTN
NDA, Decontamination Assessment under KTN NDA and Lok Ma
Chau Loop Development
Pursuant to the relevant requirements of the EIA Ordinance, the EIA
Report for the NENT NDAs, which was approved with conditions in 2013 , had
been deposited at the following website for public viewing
h吐口 ://www.epd.立oV.hk/eia/ register/report/eiareport/eia 2132013/. An
executive summary (Chinese version) of the EIA Repo此 is also available to
highlight the project scope and key findings of the EIA study. Details of the
EIA fmdings can be found in the full EIA Report in English. As the
treatment works for arsenic-containing soil have not yet commenced on site,
no relevant documentation or inspection records are available at this stage.
Based on the recommendations from the HRA in the EIA Report, soil
with arsenic concentration above 571 mg/kg will require treatment by
solidificationlstabilisation (S/S) method to ensure 也at no adverse impacts wi11
be posed to public health after completion of the NDAs development. The
S/S treatment method is a simple and well-established ground remediation
technique with international applications and local experiences. To take
forward the HRA reconunendations, we engaged the Hong Kong Polytechr吐c
University (PolyU) to cany out further study on arsenic-containing soil, and to
help formulate app1'op1'iate treatment plan fo1' KTN NDA. The PolyU study
also confi1'med that S/S treatment is effective and robust fo1' treating the soil
with arsenic level exceeding the 571 mg/kg threshold in KTN NDA. With
the implementation of effective S/S treatment, the treated soil wil1 comply with
the health 1'isk standards as stipulated in the HRA and pose no harrn to human
body. We will require the contracto1's to carry out soil sampling regular1y
during the construction phase and conduct Toxicity Leaching Procedu1'e Test
(TCLP test) to ensure the treated soil will comply with the above health risk
standa1'ds.
The arsenic-containing soil in K甘\f NDA is fundamentally different
from that in Lok Ma Chau (LMC) Loop in telms of or海in and nature. The
arsenic in LMC Loop soil is fOlmed by anthropogenic contamination, whereas
- 7 -
the arsenic in KTN soil is due to natural geological formation. F or LMC Loop, the area was used in the past as a dumping ground for contaminated sediments extracted from training works at Shenzhen River. Since the contamination is man-made, the environmental assessment and remedial measures will have to follow the 1'elevant local standa1'ds fo1' contaminated land such as the “Guidance Note for Contaminated Land Assessment and Remediation" and “Risk-based Remediation Goals fo1' Contaminated Land Management (RBRG)" promulgated by the Environmental Protection Department (EPD). In contrast, the above contamination standards do not apply in the KTN context due to the geogenic nature of arsenic in KTN soil. To ensure public safety, the Government had conducted an independent HRA during the EIA study to detelmine the acceptable health risk levels for arsenic exposure and devise suitable treatment method for minimising the risks associated with soil with higher arsenic level. The health risk levels adopted in the HRA are formulated with reference to international guideline values accepted by the W orld Health Organization (可在1:0) and the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). For LMC Loop, the volume of the soil to be treated can be found in the EIA Report for the project. For KTN NDA, the soil treatment volume is detelmined on the basis of the ground investigation data obtained during the EIA study. As a result of the different origin and nature of the arsenic containing soil in LMC Loop and KTN NDA, we formulated appropriate treatment strategies based on the soil properties and the potential risk to the area. There is no question of applying double treatment standard for the sake of cost or other factors.
We are now conducting ground investigation works at accessible locations in KTN NDA to determine the spatial distribution of arsenic-containing soil. Results will be available after completion of all ground investigation works, and will be used to establish the treatment extent. We will incorporate necessary environmental mitigation measures into contract provision to control the impacts arising 企om noise, dust and eff1uent from the works to comply with established standard and guidelines. All 甘eatment
works fo1' arsenic-containing soil will be carried out in accordance with the requirements of the EIA Report to minimise environmental nuisance. As for othe1' developments in K甘.J NDA,臼rther assessment is required to identi方
- 8 -
the extent of t1'eatment of arsenic containing soil after completion of the
ground investigation. For private developments, the relevant lease conditions
will stipulate that the developer will follow the requirements in the EIA Report
to carry out treatment works of a1'senic containing soil within the deeper soil in
order to safeguard public health and safety.
D1'inking water that is polluted with a1'senic is a majo1' source of
arsenic intake fo1' humans, followed by ingestion of a1'senic-contaminated food.
Relevant departments (including Department of Health, Agriculture, Fisheries
and Conservation Department and Envi1'onmental P1'otection Department) had
assessed that the p1'esence of arsenic in KTN soil would not pose adverse
health impacts to the public in its existing state. No abnormal arsenic content
was found during the routine testing performed by Agriculture, Fishe1'ies and
Conservation Department on samples of water from streams and wells, vegetable p1'oducts and pond fish collected in KTN area. In addition, all
drinking water will be treated befo1'e supplying to households in KTN NDA
through pipe netwo1'k. The1'efo1'e, the 1'isk of a1'senic uptake 企om food 0 1'
wate1' sources is minimal in K甘..J NDA. Based on the PolyU study, most of
the a1'senic in KTN NDA exists in the fo1'm of ferric arsenate, which exhibits
low solubility, high stability, and is unlikely to contaminate the groundwater in
the region.
As 1'egards solid waste, we are committed to avoiding and minimising
construction and demolition (C&D) materials t趾ough planning, design and
construction management to achieve sustainable development. Acco1'ding to
our preliminary estimate, all excavated materials in KτN and FLN NDAs, including the t1'eated arsenic-containing soil, would be 1'eused as filling
materials fo1' construction wo1'ks in the NDAs. This eliminates the need to
dispose construction waste to public fill 1'eception facilities and landfills.
As we a1'e currently carrying out ground investigation wo1'ks to
determine the distribution and volume of arsenic-containing soil in KTN NDA,
the 1'esults would only be available afte1' completion of all the investigation
works. We do not have the information on the volume of soil t1'eatment in
KTNNDA.
- 9 -
The land of the Fanling Golf Course has been held by the Hong Kong Golf Club under Private Recreational Lease (PRL) since 1930, the term of which will expire in 2020. The Home Affairs Bureau (HAB) is conducting the overall PRL Policy Review. Based on the current progress, HAB aims to report findings of the PRL Policy Review to the Panel on Home Affairs of the Legislative Council within 2017 and conduct public/stakeholder consultations thereafter. Nevertheless, the planning and engineering study, public engagements and various technical assessments are still requi1'ed in case of the development of the land. The time required for the above will not be less than that of the development of the KTN and FLN NDAs. In view of time needed, it is not able to replace the NDAs.
We hope the above will provide Hon CHU Hoi-dick with the information about the projects of his concerns. In view of the u1'gency of the approval fo1' the Block Allocation, we hope the Finance Committee can grant funding app1'oval as soon as possible. We stand ready to p1'ovide further infOlmation in response to Members' enquiries.
Yours since1'e旬,
fo1' Sec1'etary for Devel句pment
Copy to : Secretarγfor Financial Se1'vices & the Treasury Secreta1'y fo1' Labour and Welfa1'e Secreta1'y fo1' Home Affai1's Director of Lands Directo1' of Civil Enginee1'ing & Development
¹v
RangeFiring
·s³ò/¤jÀ
San Wai / Tai Ling Firing Range
xBarracks
Ãä¹
Ò¸
T
¹vFiring Range
¨FÀSandy Ridge Cemetery
©M¦X¥Wo Hop Shek Cemetery
¥_°Ï
Park
North District
ÁA±Lookout
¥_°Ï
Hospital
North District
ªaSw P
ªaSw P
¤j·Town Hall
PostPoliceĵ
ĵ
PostPolice
ĵ
PostPolice
ĵPolice Post
ĵPolice Post
ĵ
PostPolice
ĵ
PostPolice
ªùGate Tower
ªù
ĵ
¤s¤õÁ
ÁA±Lookout
TowerEntrance
Police Post
ÁA±Lookout
¤õ¸Crematorium
¯E
Garden
Gallant
´º¥
Garden
Tribute
°t¤Ser Res
Ser Res
°t¤Ser Res
°t¤
°t¤Ser Res
ºÑ´òAvon Park
ºñ±Belair Monte
©÷²
Court
Cheong Shing
²»µ
Estate
Cheung Wah
±m»
¶g¥
¦Ë
¯»
¯»ÀFanling Garden
¯»À
Flora Plaza
¤U
½¼¤
Ȧ
¿³¤
Tsuen
Hing Yan
¤ÕHung Leng
®£À
HANGHUNG LUNG
¹Åº
Estate
Ka Fuk
¶êÀ
ÂûKai Leng
²²¸û¼
´º²
Court
King Shing
¬ûKONG YIU
xKwan Tei
§õLei Uk
ÆF¤
Tsuen
Ling Shan
Áp©
ÀsÅ
°¨®Æ¤
San Tsuen
Ma Liu Shui
°¨«Ma Shi Po
³ÂÓ
¤åÀ
¤å»
Village
Man Kok
¤ìMuk Wu
«nµNam Wa Po
§d«Ng Uk Tsuen
§d«Ng Uk Tsuen
¸OÀY
Ling Kok
Pei Tau
©Wà|
New Village
Ping Che
¤þPing Kong
¥¬¦Po Kat Tsai
³@¤
Tsuen
Po Sheung
·s¶
·s«
Tsuen
San Uk
¨FSha Ling
¥Û´ ¥Û´ò
San Tsuen
Shek Wu
¤W¤s
Kai Wat
Sheung Shan
¤WSHEUNG SHUI
±RÁ
Tong
Shung Him
¤p§
Tsuen
Siu Hang
¥´¹TA KWU LING
¤j¬TAI HOM TUK
¤jÀTAI LENG PEI
¤jTai Lung
¤Ó¥
Estate
Tai Ping
¤jÀ
Leng
Tai Tau
¤jTai Wo
¤j¤
Tsuen
Tai Yuen
¤Ñ¥
Estate
Tin Ping
¶íTong Fong
¶í
Tong Hang
»AÄR
Garden
Tsui Lai
ªQ¶
¯¨°
Tsuen
Tsz Tong
»ÉÆ
HANGTUNG LO
µØ©
µØ¤
Estate
Wah Sum
³ò¤
Tsuen
Wai Loi
¾îWANG LENG
¾î¤s¸
San Tsuen
Wang Shan Keuk
ºa½÷
Centre
Wing Fai
¥Ã¹
Tsuen
Wing Ning
¥Ã¹
Wai
Wing Ning
©M¿
Tsuen
Wo Hing
©M¦
©M¦X
Village
Wo Hop Shek
«³»
Crest
Woodland
¯Q¾~
Lok Yeung
Wu Nga
½¹½
SHAN
WU TIP
ªY²
Court
Yan Shing
¤¸Yuen Leng
¤ô¬Shui Lau Hang
µe¬
²o´
Court
Choi Po
Ha Kung Tei
Fanling Wai
Chuk Yuen
FANLING
«n
² ` ¦
On Po
¹l²
Court
Yung Shing
¤W¤ô
Centre
Sheung Shui
©M¦X¥
San Tsuen
Wo Hop Shek
Heung Yuen Wai
Ha Heung Yuen
Tsung Yuen Ha
Kan Tau Wai
Chow Tin Tsuen
San Tong Po
Kan Tau Tsuen
¦w
Wa Mei Shan
ª@¥Sing Ping Village
x¦Kwan Tei North
ªá³£
¹p¤CAT HILL
Äéµ@¬y¤
IRRIGATION RESERVOIR
LAU SHUI HEUNG
°ªKo Po
¤W¤ô
Wa Shan
Sheung Shui
¹êÅç
Farm
Experimental
°ª®KO PO SHAN
°¨À
ªQ
TS
UN
G S
HA
N
©â¤
StationPumping
Âo¤
Works
Water Treatment
¦Ã¤ô³
Works
Sewage Treatment
Ta Kwu Ling Farm¥´¹ªÀ
½¹½º
Village
Wu Tip Shan
¤Ñ¥
Tsuen
Tin Ping Shan
±s®
RegentvilleGrand
ºaºÖ
Centre
Wing Fok
Noble Hill
¬Ó©
¥ª
¦Ñ¹
Às§
TENGLUNG MEI
»ñ°Fung Wong Wu
¤U¤s
Kai Wat
Ha Shan
±Òª
Garden
Kai Fong
ÀLeng Tsai
¤ì´ò
Nga Yiu
Muk Wu
¥ËŽNga Yiu Ha
©WPing Che
©WPing Yeung
·s«San Uk Ling
¤ôShui Hau
¥´¹ªTa Kwu Ling Village
¤j®Tai Po Tin
¥Ý®Wo Keng Shan
§üCHAM SHAN
¬û¥
¥ÕÅ
SHAN
PAK HOK
¨F
S A
N D
Y
R I
D G
E
ªF
AU
TUNG FUNG
¦ª
¤¦¤
±m¶Choi Yuen Estate
¯»À
¹Å²
Court
Ka Shing
¦°®Yuk Po Court
¯»À
Lau
Fan Leng
ªê¦Fu Tei Pai
¤U¥Ha Pak Tsuen
Hok Tau Wai
ÂÑÀ
Tsuen
Kan Lung
¤EÀs§
Lo Wai
Kau Lung Hang
¤EÀs§
San Wai
Kau Lung Hang
¾ôKiu Tau
¬y¤
¦ÑLo Wai
³ÂÓ
Tsuen
Ma Wat
·sSan Wai
¤p§|
San Tsuen
Siu Hang
±½ºSo Kwun Po
ªF»
Wai
Tung Kok
Ü«
LENG
CHONG TSIN
¤EÀsCLOUDY HILL
( KAU LUNG HANG SHAN )
®Ü¥JKAT TSAI SHAN AU
ºß°KEI LAK TSAI
ÆFLING HILL
ÀsLUNG SHAN
»ZPO LENG
»ZÀ
¬Ó¦QUEEN'S HILL
µØWA SHAN
¶À±
SHAN
WONG KONG
±s¬Royal Green
CHAI
YUEN LENG
²MªChing Ho Estate
¤W¥
Tsuen Pak
Sheung
¤¤¤
Tsuen SumChung
ªù¤
TsuenMun Hau
ªQ¬
Ma Wat Wai
±ï
®
¥
µ{¨TSING KEI HANG
°ï¶Landfill
RI
VE
R S
UT
LEJ
(S
HE
K S
HE
UN
G
RIVER)
RIVER I
NDUS(NG
TUNG RIVER)
³Â
ª
MA
WA
T
RI
VER
(PI
NG YUEN
RIVER)
RIVER
GANGES
RI
VE
R G
ANGES(PI
NG
YU
EN
RI
VE
R)
¦w¼On Lok Tsuen
¬õ¾ô
San Tsuen
Hung Kiu
Village
Kaw Liu
LUNG YEUK TAU
Centre
Fanling
Wah Ming Estate
Dawning Views
Lau Shui Heung
¸U»Belair Villa
Tsung Pak Long
«È®Hak Ka Wai
¶í§|
Tung Chuen
Tong Hang
®üÁpUnion Plaza
µR¤ûHIGH HILL
¿ßSTAG HILL
AU
PO LENG
¤û
«Ò®Regentville
LAMB HILL( MA TAU LENG )
RIVER
KONG NGA PO
KW
AN
TEI RI
VER
¥ÛSHEK O
®à(ªø¨jTABLE HILL
( CHEUNG PO TAU )
SH
ENZ
HE
N
RI
VE
R
°ª®Ko Po North
EAST R
AIL
LI
NE
ªF
Å
¯»
Fanlin
g
¤W
Sheung Shui
¤å
ÀA
©W
à
¨F
ÀY¨
°¨·
¬¤Å¹
¯
À¤¸
¯»
ÀA
9
9
«C¤
½
SHA
TAU
KOK R
OAD
FA
N
KAM
RO
AD
LAU
SH
UI
HE
UN
G
RO
AD
PI
NG
CHE
ROAD
CASTLE PEAK ROAD
FU TEI AU ROAD
ªê¦a
¾É
Pipeline
¾É
Pipeline
¿é¤ô
Water Tunnel
º¯Âo¦Ã¤
Treatment WorksLeachate
¾É
Pipeli
ne
¾É
Pipeline
xBarracks
xBarracks
¹v
RangeFiring
¹v
ù´ò¤ÀLo Wu Classification Range
Range
Firing
Ãä¹Ò¸T Frontier Closed
Area Boundary
°ªº¸¤
Golf Course
ĵ
PostPolice
ĵPolice Post
ĵ
PostPolice
ĵ
PostPolice
Åï®p¤
Ancestral Hall
Man Lun Fung¤j¤
ÁA±Lookout
ù´òÃ
Correctional Institution
Lo Wu
Âù³½ªe¶Beas River Country Club
MansionTai Fu Tai
Ser Res
°t¤
ùLo Wu
¤j¥
±o¤
ÅKTit Hang
¶íTong Kok
ð¤Tong Kung Leng
ÅÂÀ
Hang
Tse Koo
«CÀ
Tsuen
Tsing Lung
¿¼®|
Lo Wai
Tsiu Keng
¿¼®|
Pang Uk
Tsiu Keng
¿¼®|
San Wai
Tsiu Keng
ªQTsung Yuen
ªFÂ
Wai
Tung Chan
ªFTung Fong
¤¯¹
§ñ¼æ§
§ñ¼æ
Mei Tsuen
Yau Tam
¿PYin Kong
¤jÃ
¹ÅÄRCasas Domingo
³¯«
ªøCheung Lek
¿»¥
Tsuen
Fan Tin
ºÖ¥FUK TSUEN SHAN
ȖFung Kong
»ñ±FUNG KONG SHAN
¤UÆ
Tsuen
Ha Wan
§|Hang Tau
§|ÀY
Tai Po
Hang Tau
ªe¤
Heung
Ho Sheung
Ä®´
ª÷Kam Tsin
ÄQÅ
ÄQÅï
ÄQÅ
Tsuen
Ki Lun
¥jKwu Tung
½¬¶Lin Tong Mei
½¬¶í§
Tsoi Yuen
Lin Tong Mei
®ÆLiu Pok
¸¨°
³À§
Tsuen
Luk Mei
°¨¯
°¨¯óÃ
San Tsuen
Ma Tso Lung
¦Ì®H
Tsuen
Mai Po Lung
ºÑ»Maple Gardens
µÚNgam Pin
¤û¼
¤û
¦wÀ
¥Õ¥Pak Shek Au
´^À
©W
¼ï«¤TÄ
·sÀ
Tsuen
San Lung
·s
¥Û
¥Û¥
Leng
Shek Tsai
¥Û´Shek Wu Wai
¥Û´ò³
San Tsuen
Shek Wu Wai
¤pê
Tsuen
Siu Hum
¥Ã¥
Üñ
¸¨°
Chau
Lok Ma
¦Ã¤ô³
¦Ã¤ô³
Works
Treatment
Sewage
On Lung Tsuen
Chan Uk Po
Pang Loon Tei
Pun Uk Tsuen
ù
Âo¤Water Treatment Works
³òWai Tsai
¥Û¥JÀ
Garden
Dills Corner
¥j¬}
RESERVOIR
KWU TUNG
«H¸q
¤j¨
¬wChau Tau
ü¤
§
ÁÚº¸Miami Crescent
¦X²Hop Shing Wai
±sªLThe Royal Oaks
¸²µThe Vineyard
Yau Tam Mei San Tsuen
Works
Sewage Treatment
Tak Yuet Lau
¼Ú·NEuropa Garden
¤UÆWº®
San Tsuen
Ha Wan Fisherman
±ï
®RI
VE
R I
ND
US
¥Û
¤
(N
G
TU
NG
RI
VE
R)
¸¨°¨¬wª
New Village
Lutheran
¤ÑValais
¿¼
¤û¨HORN HILL
( NGAU KOK SHAN )
Âù³
RI
VE
R
BE
AS(S
HEU
NG
YU
E
RI
VE
R)
HADDEN HILL( KI LUN SHAN )
SADDLE PASS( KI LUN SHAN AU )
CREST HILL( TAI SHEK MO )
ÂùÉÓLECKY PASS
LEI YUE )( SEUNG MA
±ÆÀVERNON PASS( PAI TAU LO )
Yan Shau Wai
TsuenWing Ping
TA
M
SH
UI
ºq½The Green
ù
Lo
Wu
EAST RAIL LINE
ªFÅ
¸¨°
Lok Ma Chau
¥¬¸
¯À¤¸
¸¨
°¨
·s¥Ð
KWU TUNG ROAD
SAN
TIN
HIGHWAY
SA
N
TI
N
TS
UE
N
RO
AD
¤¼§¸
«C¤s
·s²
9
TAM
MEI
R
OA
D
HO S
HE
UN
G
HE
UN
G
RO
AD
ªe¤
W
ROAD
FA
N
KA
M
RO
AD
Water
Tunnel
¿é
¤ô
¿é¤ô
Water T
unnel
Fire Lookout
LUEN WO HUI
MAN KAM TO
SHEK WU HUI
SHUI NGAU TSO
WO HOP SHEK
NAM HANG
LO SHUE LING
TARGET VALLEY
MA
N
KA
M T
O R
OA
D
JOC
KE
Y CL
UB R
OA
D
FA
NLI
NG
HI
GH
WA
Y
TAI LAW HAU
HOO HOK WAI
LOK MA CHAU
NGAU TEI
PING HANG
SAM PO SHUE
SAN TIN
SHEK MA
LONG VALLEY
LO WU
TA SHA LOK
MA TSO LUNG
LOK MA CHAU LOOP
TSIU KENG
FANLING HIGHWAY
LO
K
MA
CH
AU
RO
AD
CASTLE P
EAK R
OAD
SA
N S
HA
M R
OA
D
A3 420MM X 297MM
¤g ¤ì ¤u µ{ ©
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
CIVIL ENGINEERING AND
ø
®Ö
®Ö
drawn
checked
approved ¹Ï«h drawing no.
¤ñ scale
¶µ¥Ø item no.
¤é date
¤é date
¤é date
initialñ
initialñ
initialñ
approved®Ö
checked
®Ödescription
¤º®edate
¤é½sno.
× REVISION
¹Ï«h drawing title ¿ì¨ office
DEVELOPMENT OFFICE
NEW TERRITORIES EAST
·s ¬É ªF ©Ý
16
100
100
100
100
183
183
134
9
9
¥ ¬¸
¿P
ªe¤»ñ
¥Õ¥
¥j
NTWZ 2019A
1:12 000 (A3)
LONG VALLEY
YIN KONG
KWU TUNG
PAK SHEK AU
HO SHEUNG HEUNGFUNG KONG
MA TSO LUNG
HO S
HEUN
G HE
UNG RO
AD
PO LAU ROAD
Lok Ma Cha
u Spur Lin
e
LUNG ROAD
MA TSO
Lok Ma Chau Spur Line
FANLING HIGHWAY
KWU TUNG ROAD
ªe¤
W
Ãb
°¨
ªi¼
¸̈°̈
¬
¸̈ °̈ ¬
´ä
ÅKª
LEGEND:
¯»À
BOUNDARY OF KWU TUNG NORTH NEW DEVELOPMENT AREA
SHEUNG SHUI
LOK MA CHAU
LOCATION PLAN
¸¨°
¤W
¥j¬}¥_·
¯»À¥_·
NEW DEVELOPMENT AREA
KWU TUNG NORTH
NEW DEVELOPMENT AREA
FANLING NORTH
PROPOSED SITE FORMATION FOR VILLAGE RESITE AREA
±ï
®
NPROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF LONG VALLEY NATURE PARK
PROPOSED REPROVISIONING / ENHANCEMENT OF EGRETRY SITE
°¨¯
Üñ
NG TUNG RIVER
N
East Rail Line
«C¤s¤½̧ô(
)uaT uahC( DAOR KAEP ELTSAC
27.01.2017
A 25.07.2014 OFFICE NAME CHANGEDW.Y. CHAN P.L. LAI
SIGNED SIGNED
W K LAU
C Y LO
M T LEUNG
27.01.2017
27.01.2017
WORKS AT KWU TUNG NORTH NEW DEVELOPMENT AREA
FIRST STAGE SITE FORMATION AND ENGINEERING INFRASTRUCTURE
PROVISIONALSUBJECT TO AMENDMENT
16
Range
Firing
115
164
52
34
100
100
Ser Res
°t¤
9
9
16
Range
Firing
115
164
52
34
100
100
Ser Res
°t¤
9
9
¹v
RangeFiring
·s³ò/¤jÀ
San Wai / Tai Ling Firing Range
xBarracks
Ãä¹
Ò¸
T
Frontier Closed Area Boundary
¹vFiring Range
¨FÀSandy Ridge Cemetery
©M¦X¥Wo Hop Shek Cemetery
¥_°Ï
Park
North District
ÁA±Lookout
¥_°Ï
Hospital
North District
ªaSw P
ªaSw P
¤j·Town Hall
PostPoliceĵ
ĵ
PostPolice
ĵ
PostPolice
ĵPolice Post
ĵPolice Post
ĵ
PostPolice
ĵ
PostPolice
ĵ
PostPolice
ĵ
PostPolice
ÁA±Lookout
ªø¤sCheung Shan Monastery
ªùGate Tower
ªù
ĵ
¤s¤õÁ
ÁA±Lookout
TowerEntrance
¸©w¥
Ip Ting-sz
Residence of
Police Post
ÁA±Lookout
¤õ¸Crematorium
¯E
Garden
Gallant
´º¥
Garden
Tribute
°t¤Ser Res
Ser Res
°t¤Ser Res
°t¤Ser Res
°t¤Ser Res
°t¤
°t¤Ser Res
ºÑ´òAvon Park
ºñ±Belair Monte
©÷²
Court
Cheong Shing
²»µ
Estate
Cheung Wah
±m»
¶g¥
¦Ë
¯»
¯»ÀFanling Garden
¯»À
Flora Plaza
»ñ¶é
¤U
½¼¤
Ȧ
¿³¤
Tsuen
Hing Yan
HUNG FA CHAI
( HUNG FA LENG )
¤ÕHung Leng
®£À
HANGHUNG LUNG
¹Åº
Estate
Ka Fuk
¶êÀ
ÂûKai Leng
²²¸û¼
´º²
Court
King Shing
¬ûKONG YIU
xKwan Tei
§õLei Uk
À¥Leng Pei Tsuen
½¬³Lin Ma Hang
ÆF¤
Tsuen
Ling Shan
Áp©
ÀsÅ
°¨®Æ¤
San Tsuen
Ma Liu Shui
°¨§
°¨«Ma Shi Po
³ÂÓ
¤åÀ
¤å»
Village
Man Kok
¸U«Man Uk Pin
¤ìMuk Wu
«nµNam Wa Po
§d«Ng Uk Tsuen
§d«Ng Uk Tsuen
©ùNGONG TONG
¥ÕªPAK FU SHAN
¥_¤jPAK TAI TO YAN
¸OÀY
Ling Kok
Pei Tau
©Wà|
New Village
Ping Che
¤þPing Kong
¥³PING TENG AU
¥¬¦Po Kat Tsai
³@¤
Tsuen
Po Sheung
¤½¥PRINCESS HILL
¬õªROBIN'S NEST
·s¶
·s«
Tsuen
San Uk
¨FSha Ling
¨FÃSHA LO TUNG
¥Û¹
¥Û´ ¥Û´ò
San Tsuen
Shek Wu
¤W¤s
Kai Wat
Sheung Shan
¤WSHEUNG SHUI
¤ô¤
±RÁ
Tong
Shung Him
¤p§
Tsuen
Siu Hang
·à¦
¥´¹TA KWU LING
¤j¬TAI HOM TUK
¤jÀTAI LENG PEI
¤jTai Lung
¤Ó¥
Estate
Tai Ping
¤jÀ
Leng
Tai Tau
¤jTai Wo
¤jTai Wo
¤j¤
Tsuen
Tai Yuen
¤Ñ¥
Estate
Tin Ping
¶íTong Fong
¶í
Tong Hang
»AÄR
Garden
Tsui Lai
ªQ¶
¯¨°
Tsuen
Tsz Tong
»ÉÆ
HANGTUNG LO
µØ©
µØ¤
Estate
Wah Sum
³ò¤
Tsuen
Wai Loi
¾î
¾îWANG LENG
¾î¤s¸
San Tsuen
Wang Shan Keuk
ºa½÷
Centre
Wing Fai
¥Ã¹
Tsuen
Wing Ning
¥Ã¹
Wai
Wing Ning
©M¿
Tsuen
Wo Hing
©M¦
©M¦X
Village
Wo Hop Shek
¥Ý®WO KENG SHAN
«³»
Crest
Woodland
¯Q¾~
Lok Yeung
Wu Nga
½¹½
SHAN
WU TIP
ªY²
Court
Yan Shing
¤¸Yuen Leng
¼qMIU KENG
¤ô¬Shui Lau Hang
¤sSHAN TONG
µe¬
²o´
¥ÛË
Court
Choi Po
Ha Kung Tei
Lo Tsuen
Fung Yuen
Fanling Wai
Chuk Yuen
FANLING
«n
² ` ¦
² ` ¦
On Po
¹l²
Court
Yung Shing
¤W¤ô
Centre
Sheung Shui
©M¦X¥
San Tsuen
Wo Hop Shek
Heung Yuen Wai
Ha Heung Yuen
Tsung Yuen Ha
Kan Tau Wai
Chow Tin Tsuen
San Tong Po
Kan Tau Tsuen
¦w
Wa Mei Shan
ª@¥Sing Ping Village
x¦Kwan Tei North
ªá³£
¹p¤CAT HILL
ÅbÃÁÄé
Äéµ@¬y¤
IRRIGATION RESERVOIR
LAU SHUI HEUNG
RESERVOIR
HOK TAU IRRIGATION
°ªKo Po
¤W¤ô
Wa Shan
Sheung Shui
¨Fù¬
Cheung Uk
Sha Lo Tung
¹êÅç
Farm
Experimental
°ª®KO PO SHAN
°¨À
ªQ
TS
UN
G S
HA
N
©â¤
StationPumping
Âo¤
Works
Water Treatment
¦Ã¤ô³
Works
Sewage Treatment
Ta Kwu Ling Farm
¥Õ¥Ð
New VillagePak Tin
¥´¹ªÀ
½¹½º
Village
Wu Tip Shan
¤Ñ¥
Tsuen
Tin Ping Shan
±s®
RegentvilleGrand
ºaºÖ
Centre
Wing Fok
Noble Hill
¬Ó©
·s®San Kwai Tin
¥ª
¦Ñ¹
Às§
TENGLUNG MEI
»ñ°Fung Wong Wu
¤U¤s
Kai Wat
Ha Shan
±Òª
Garden
Kai Fong
ÀLeng Tsai
µÜ
Loi Tung
¤ì´ò
Nga Yiu
Muk Wu
¥ËŽNga Yiu Ha
©WPing Che
©WPing Yeung
·s«San Uk Ling
¤ôShui Hau
¥´¹ªTa Kwu Ling Village
¤j®Tai Po Tin
¤j¶Tai Tong Wu
¶í¨{
Shan Tsuen
Tong To
¥Ý®Wo Keng Shan
§üCHAM SHAN
ªøCHEUNG SHAN
¬û¥
¥ÕÅ
SHAN
PAK HOK
¨F
S A
N D
Y
R I
D G
E
ªF
AU
TUNG FUNG
¶ÀT
SHANWONG MAU HANG
¥¤Ping Shan Chai
ÀtÀKWAI TAU LENG
¦ª
¤¦¤
±m¶Choi Yuen Estate
¯»À
¹Å²
Court
Ka Shing
¦°®Yuk Po Court
¯»À
Lau
Fan Leng
ªê¦Fu Tei Pai
¤U¥Ha Pak Tsuen
ÅbÃ
Hok Tau Pai
ÅbÃ
Hok Tau Wai
ÂÑÀ
Tsuen
Kan Lung
¤EÀs§
Lo Wai
Kau Lung Hang
¤EÀs§
San Wai
Kau Lung Hang
¾ôKiu Tau
¬y¤
¦ÑLo Wai
°¨§À¤
Leng Tsui
Ma Mei Ha
³ÂÓ
Tsuen
Ma Wat
·s«
San Uk Tsai
·sSan Wai
¨Fù¬
Lei Uk
Sha Lo Tung
¤p§|
San Tsuen
Siu Hang
±½ºSo Kwun Po
·àÀSze Tau Leng
¤¦¦
Hang
Tan Chuk
¤¦¦Ë§
Lo Wai
Tan Chuk Hang
ªF»
Wai
Tung Kok
ªF¤Tung Shan Ha
Ü«
LENG
CHONG TSIN
¤EÀsCLOUDY HILL
( KAU LUNG HANG SHAN )
®Ü¥JKAT TSAI SHAN AU
ºß°KEI LAK TSAI
ÆFLING HILL
ÀsLUNG SHAN
«nNAM SHAN
»ZPO LENG
»ZÀ
¬Ó¦QUEEN'S HILL
µØWA SHAN
¶À±
SHAN
WONG KONG
±s¬Royal Green
CHAI
YUEN LENG
²MªChing Ho Estate
¤W¥
Tsuen Pak
Sheung
¤¤¤
Tsuen SumChung
ªù¤
TsuenMun Hau
ªQ¬
WANG LEK
SHEK AU SHAN
Ma Wat Wai
±ï
®
¥
µ{¨TSING KEI HANG
°ï¶Landfill
RI
VE
R S
UT
LEJ
(S
HE
K S
HE
UN
G
RIVER)
RIVER I
NDUS(NG
TUNG RIVER)
³Â
ª
MA
WA
T
RI
VER
(PI
NG YUEN
RIVER)
RIVER
GANGES
RI
VE
R G
ANGES(PI
NG
YU
EN
RI
VE
R)
Ma Mei Ha
¦w¼On Lok Tsuen
¬õ¾ô
San Tsuen
Hung Kiu
Village
Kaw Liu
LUNG YEUK TAU
Centre
Fanling
Wah Ming Estate
Dawning Views
Lau Shui Heung
¸U»Belair Villa
Tsung Pak Long
«È®Hak Ka Wai
¶í§|
Tung Chuen
Tong Hang
®õ¦ë¦
Fui Sha Wai
Tai Hang
®õ¦ë¤
Chung Sum Wai
Tai Hang
®õ¦ë¯
Tsz Tong Tsuen
Tai Hang
®üÁpUnion Plaza
µR¤ûHIGH HILL
¿ßSTAG HILL
AU
PO LENG
¤û
«Ò®Regentville
³òÀY§
Che Tei
Wai Tau Tsuen
DUKES HILL( SZE TEI SHAN )
LAMB HILL( MA TAU LENG )
(
TA
N S
HA
N
RI
VE
R )
RIVER JHELUM
KONG NGA PO
KW
AN
TEI RI
VER
¥ÛSHEK O
®à(ªø¨jTABLE HILL
( CHEUNG PO TAU )
SHE
NZHE
N
RI
SH
ENZ
HE
N
RI
VE
R
°ª®Ko Po North
EAST R
AIL
LI
NE
ªF
Å
¯»
Fanlin
g
¤W
Sheung Shui
½¬³Â
¤å
ÀA
©W
à
¨F
ÀY¨
Åb
Ã
°¨·
¬¤Å¹
¯
À¤¸
¯»
ÀA
9
9
«C¤
½
SHA
TAU
KOK R
OAD
HOK TAU
ROA
D
FA
N
KAM
RO
AD
LAU S
HUI
HE
UN
G
RO
AD
PI
NG
CHE
ROAD
CASTLE PEAK ROAD
FU TEI AU ROAD
ªê¦a
LIN
MA
HANG ROAD
¾É
Pipeline
¾É
Pipeline
¿é¤ô
Water Tunnel
¿é¤ô
¿é¤ô
Water
Tunnel
¿é¤ô
Water T
unnel
¿é¤ô
Water Tunnel
º¯Âo¦Ã¤
Treatment WorksLeachate
¾É
Pipeli
ne
¾É
Pipeline
xBarracks
xBarracks
¹v
RangeFiring
¹v
ù´ò¤ÀLo Wu Classification Range
Range
Firing
Ãä¹Ò¸T Frontier Closed
Area Boundary
°ªº¸¤
Golf Course
ĵ
PostPolice
ĵPolice Post
ĵ
PostPolice
ĵ
PostPolice
Åï®p¤
Ancestral Hall
Man Lun Fung¤j¤
ÁA±Lookout
ù´òÃ
Correctional Institution
Lo Wu
Âù³½ªe¶Beas River Country Club
MansionTai Fu Tai
Ser Res
°t¤
°t¤Ser Res
ùLo Wu
¤j¥
±o¤
ÅKTit Hang
¶íTong Kok
ð¤Tong Kung Leng
ÅÂÀ
Hang
Tse Koo
«CÀ
Tsuen
Tsing Lung
¿¼®|
Lo Wai
Tsiu Keng
¿¼®|
Pang Uk
Tsiu Keng
¿¼®|
San Wai
Tsiu Keng
ªQTsung Yuen
ªFÂ
Wai
Tung Chan
ªFTung Fong
¤¯¹
§ñ¼æ§
§ñ¼æ
Mei Tsuen
Yau Tam
¿PYin Kong
ÀçYing Pun
¤jÃ
®L«Â¦Casa Paradizo
¹ÅÄRCasas Domingo
³¯«
ªøCheung Lek
¦Ë¶
Tsuen
Chuk Yuen
¿»¥
Tsuen
Fan Tin
ºÖ¿
LeiFuk Hing
ºÖ¥FUK TSUEN SHAN
ȖFung Kong
»ñ±FUNG KONG SHAN
¤UÆ
Tsuen
Ha Wan
§|Hang Tau
§|ÀY
Tai Po
Hang Tau
ªe¤
Heung
Ho Sheung
Ä®´
ª÷Kam Tsin
ÄQÅ
ÄQÅï
ÄQÅ
Tsuen
Ki Lun
¥jKwu Tung
½mª
Tsuen
Lin Barn
½¬¶Lin Tong Mei
½¬¶í§
Tsoi Yuen
Lin Tong Mei
®ÆLiu Pok
¸¨°
Long Ha
³À§
Tsuen
Luk Mei
°¨¯
°¨¯óÃ
San Tsuen
Ma Tso Lung
¦Ì®H
Lo Wai
Mai Po
¦Ì®H
Tsuen
Mai Po Lung
ºÑ»Maple Gardens
µÚNgam Pin
¤û¼NGAU TAM MEI
¤û
¦wÀ
¥Õ¥Pak Shek Au
´^À
©W
¼ï«
¥[¦{Royal Palms
¤TÄ
·sÀ
Tsuen
San Lung
·s
·s³
Tsuen
San Wai
¥Û
¥Û¥
Leng
Shek Tsai
¥Û´Shek Wu Wai
¥Û´ò³
San Tsuen
Shek Wu Wai
¤W¦
¤pê
Tsuen
Siu Hum
¦Ì®H
San Tsuen
Mai Po
§ñ¬ü
San TsuenYau Mei
¥Ã¥
®Ô
Üñ
¸¨°
Chau
Lok Ma
¦Ã¤ô³
¦Ã¤ô³
Works
Treatment
Sewage
On Lung Tsuen
Chan Uk Po
Pang Loon Tei
Pun Uk Tsuen
ù
Âo¤Water Treatment Works
³òWai Tsai
¥Û¥JÀ
Garden
Dills Corner
¥j¬}
RESERVOIR
KWU TUNG
«H¸q
¤j¨
¬wChau Tau
ü¤
§
ÁÚº¸Miami Crescent
¦X²Hop Shing Wai
°ª
±sªLThe Royal Oaks
¸²µThe Vineyard
»AGreen Crest
Yau Tam Mei San Tsuen
Works
Sewage Treatment
Tak Yuet Lau
¼Ú·NEuropa Garden
©É¦Ian Court
¤UÆWº®
San Tsuen
Ha Wan Fisherman
±ï
®RI
VE
R I
ND
US
¥Û
¤
(N
G
TU
NG
RI
VE
R)
¸¨°¨¬wª
New Village
Lutheran
¤ÑValais
¿¼
¤û¨HORN HILL
( NGAU KOK SHAN )
Âù³
RI
VE
R
BE
AS(S
HEU
NG
YU
E
RI
VE
R)
Yuen
Sheung Chuk
HADDEN HILL( KI LUN SHAN )
SADDLE PASS( KI LUN SHAN AU )
CREST HILL( TAI SHEK MO )
ÂùÉÓLECKY PASS
LEI YUE )( SEUNG MA
±ÆÀVERNON PASS( PAI TAU LO )
Yan Shau Wai
TsuenWing Ping
TA
M
SH
UI
HA
NG
¦
ª
SH
ENZ
HE
N
RI
VE
R
ºq½The Green
ù
Lo
Wu
EAST RAIL LINE
ªFÅ
¸¨°
Lok Ma Chau
Express
Rail
Link under
Construction
¿³
«Ø
¤¤
¤§
¥¬¸
¯À¤¸
¸¨
°¨
·s¥Ð
KWU TUNG ROAD
¯»
ÀA
SAN
TIN
HIGHWAY
·s
¥Ð
SA
N
TI
N
TS
UE
N
RO
AD
¤¼§¸
«C¤s
·s²
9
9
NGAU TAM
MEI
R
OA
D
HO S
HE
UN
G
HE
UN
G
RO
AD
ªe¤
W
TAM KON CHAU ROAD
FA
N
KA
M
RO
AD
Pipeline
¾É
Water
Tunnel
¿é
¤ô
Water Tunnel
¿é¤ô
¿é¤ô
Water T
unnel
Fire Lookout
LUEN WO HUI
MAN KAM TO
SHEK TSAI HA
SHEK WU HUI
SHUI NGAU TSO
WO HOP SHEK
NAM HANG
LO SHUE LING
TARGET VALLEY
MA
N
KA
M T
O R
OA
D
JOC
KE
Y CL
UB R
OA
D
FA
NLI
NG
HI
GH
WA
Y
TAI LAW HAU
HOO HOK WAI
LOK MA CHAU
NGAU TEI
PING HANG
SAM PO SHUE
SAN TIN
SHEK MA
LONG VALLEY
LO WU
TA SHA LOK
KO HANG
MA TSO LUNG
LOK MA CHAU LOOP
TSIU KENG
FANLING HIGHWAY
LO
K
MA
CH
AU
RO
AD
CASTLE P
EAK R
OAD
SA
N S
HA
M R
OA
D
N
¯»
¤W
°̈ ·
±ï
®
Ref DGN 1647, 1648, 1670, 1739
NG TUNG RIVER
FA
NLI
NG
HI
GH
WA
Y
LUNG YEUK TAU
FANLING NORTH NEW DEVELOPMENT AREA
ENGINEERING INFRASTRUCTURE WORKS FOR
ADVANCE SITE FORMATION AND
NTWZ 2020A
LEGEND:
FANLING
SHEUNG SHUI
Áp©
¥Û´
ÀsÅ
SHEK WU HUI
LUEN WO HUI
FANLING HIGHWAY
JOCKEY CLUB ROAD
Lok
Ma Chau Spur Line
ä́ÅKª
¸¨°¨¬
»̄À
1:15 000 (A3)
¸¨°
¤W
¥j¬}¥_·
¯»À¥_·
NEW DEVELOPMENT AREA
FANLING NORTH
SHEUNG SHUI
NEW DEVELOPMENT AREA
KWU TUNG NORTH
LOK MA CHAU
N
LOCATION PLAN
BOUNDARY OF FANLING NORTH NEW DEVELOPMENT AREA
East Rail Line
PROPOSED REPROVISIONING / ENHANCEMENT OF EGRETRY SITES
Âù³
SHEUNG YU RIVER
27.01.2017
A 25.07.2014 OFFICE NAME CHANGEDW.Y. CHAN P.L. LAI
SIGNED SIGNED
WORKS AT FANLING NORTH NEW DEVELOPMENT AREA
FIRST STAGE SITE FORMATION AND ENGINEERING INFRASTRUCTURE
W K LAU
C Y LO
M T LEUNG
27.01.2017
27.01.2017
PROVISIONALSUBJECT TO AMENDMENT
A3 420MM X 297MM
¤g ¤ì ¤u µ{ ©
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
CIVIL ENGINEERING AND
ø
®Ö
®Ö
drawn
checked
approved ¹Ï«h drawing no.
¤ñ scale
¶µ¥Ø item no.
¤é date
¤é date
¤é date
initialñ
initialñ
initialñ
approved®Ö
checked
®Ödescription
¤º®edate
¤é½sno.
× REVISION
¹Ï«h drawing title ¿ì¨ office
DEVELOPMENT OFFICE
NEW TERRITORIES EAST
·s ¬É ªF ©Ý