Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON SEISMIC PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF TRADITIONAL TIMBER FRAME STRUCTURES WITH LARGE HANGING WALLS
* ** *** **** *****
Saki OHMURA, Yasuhiro NAMBU, Yoshihiro SHIBUYA, Mina SUGINO and Yasuhiro HAYASHI
The objective of this study is demonstrative elucidation of mechanical characteristics of timber frame structures with large hangingwalls in order to construct a reasonable and practical seismic evaluation method. First, we conduct static loading tests of timber framestructures with full walls or large hanging walls which have different specifications of walls and the number of spans. Second, weanalyze damage states and mechanical characteristics of the specimens and their elements such as mud wall, columns and Sashigamoi.Finally, we reveal the applicability and problems of the current methods based on the test results.
Keywords: Traditional Timber Building, Static Loading Test, Large Hanging Wall,Seismic Performance Evaluation, Deformation Capacity
, , , ,
Graduate Student, Dept. of Architecture and Architectural Eng., Kyoto Univ.Graduate Student, Dept. of Architecture and Architectural Eng., Kyoto Univ., M. Eng.,JSPS Research Fellow, DC1Kansai Electric Power Co., Inc., M. Eng.Assist. Prof., Dept. of Architecture and Architectural Eng., Kyoto Univ., Dr. Eng.Prof., Dept. of Architecture and Architectural Eng., Kyoto Univ., Dr. Eng.
***
*******
*****
( )DC1
( )( )
1.
1) 1
2)~10)
1 1 )
(
) 1 2 )
1 3 )
1 4 ) ~ 1 6 )
1(a) (b)
大垂壁を有する伝統木造軸組架構の耐震性能評価に関する実験的研究EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON SEISMIC PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
OF TRADITIONAL TIMBER FRAME STRUCTURES WITH LARGE HANGING WALLS
大 村 早 紀*,南 部 恭 広**,澁 谷 悦 敬***,杉 野 未 奈****,林 康 裕*****
Saki OHMURA, Yasuhiro NAMBU, Yoshihiro SHIBUYA, Mina SUGINO and Yasuhiro HAYASHI
* 京都大学大学院工学研究科建築学専攻 修士課程 ** 京都大学大学院工学研究科建築学専攻 博士後期課程・修士(工学)
日本学術振興会特別研究員 DC1 *** 関西電力㈱(元 京都大学大学院生)・修士(工学) **** 京都大学大学院工学研究科建築学専攻 助教・博士(工学)***** 京都大学大学院工学研究科建築学専攻 教授・工博
Grad. Stud., Dept. of Architecture and Architectural Eng., Kyoto Univ.Grad. Stud., Dept. of Architecture and Architectural Eng., Kyoto Univ., M.Eng., JSPS Research Fellow, DC1Kansai Electric Power Co., Inc., M.Eng.Assist. Prof., Dept. of Architecture and Architectural Eng., Kyoto Univ., Dr.Eng.Prof., Dept. of Architecture and Architectural Eng., Kyoto Univ., Dr.Eng.
日本建築学会構造系論文集 第81巻 第727号,1479-1489, 2016年9月J. Struct. Constr. Eng., AIJ, Vol. 81 No. 727, 1479-1489, Sep., 2016
DOI http://doi.org/10.3130/aijs.81.1479【カテゴリーⅠ】�
─ 1479 ─
構造系 727号�
2.
2 .1
1 1
W
1 9
1
2
2700mm 1820mm
3870mm 1800mm
1 8 2 0 mm
120 120mm 120 240mm 120
270mm
E 9 0
V P
2 -
1 7 ) 2
F
2 P 4 P
c m # -
N 40mm 60mm
T 40mm 200mm
15mm 60mm
(a)
3 3 6
1(a)~(c) 3 15mm
1 1(d)~(f)
2 15mm 1
120mm 30mm
4P12#12#12N
3
1
3 3(a),
(b) 18) (=60mm)
3 ( c )19) 200mm
3 (a ) 4 0mm
3(b) 15mm
3 0 m m
18mm 30mm
3 ( c )
30mm 75mm
110mm
(a) F12#12N (b) F12#12
(g) F12-12
1820
2700
(d) 2P12#12N (e) 2P12#12
1820
1800
1800
3870
270
1820
(f) 4P12#12#12N
1 mm
1820
300600
600600
600
(c) F12#12T
1820
450900
900450
1820 1820 1820
600600
600
1820
1820 1820
600600
600
(h) 2P12-12 (i) 4P12-12-12
1 W
3 mm
(a) F12#12N2P12#12N
4P12#12#12N
(b) F12#122P12#12
(c) F12#12T
2mm
(a) (b)
220
270
6812
63012
0
135
135
270
30
67.5
67.5
MOE MOR(mm) (kg/m3) (kN/mm2) (N/mm2)
443 9.7 51.0411 8.1 52.0438 9.7 59.1403 9.8 56.8407 8.3 35.1421 8.1 55.3398 6.8 47.3466 7.2 46.2440 7.7 38.5403 8.2 44.6439 6.8 41.8387 8.0 39.2421 6.6 41.4423 7.7 56.9434 8.8 62.4440 7.9 45.7398 8.3 39.9438 8.6 51.7384 7.6 42.0406 8.0 45.7
F12-12
W(kN)(mm) (mm)
25.7
60 15
60 40
15
18
40
60 40
60
200
2P12#12N
25.7
25.7
25.7
4P12-12-12 26 18 51.1
25.7
18 25.726
51.1
2P12#12
60 40
120×120
120×120
120×120
25.72P12-12 26
F12#12N
F12#12T
F12#12
4P12#12#12N 120×120
120×120
120×120
120×120
(kN)
5.0
4.6
14.2
3.9
4.2
7.5
1.6
2.1
3.5
120×120
120×120
11030200
15
120
10
90
120
3030 60
1510
120
120
15 15
3030 60
15
120
120
─ 1480 ─
構造系 727号�
(b)
1 2 3
1(g) F12-12 4 26mm17) 5
30mm
45mm 1(h),(i)
2 3
4P12-
12-12
2P12-12 4P12-12-1220 )
(c )
3
MOE MOR
14 1680mm
1 2
1440mm 1
2 . 2
4
1
W 4
2 1 )
4(a)
HD-B10
2
1/200 1/120 1/100 1/75 1/50 1/30 1/20 1/15 1/
10 1/8 1/6 1/5 1/4rad 1/
200rad
R ( 1 )
hR /δ= (1)
δ
h h =2700mm
h =3870mm
R h ( 2 )
2/ hR hh δ= (2)
δh h 2
h 2=1800mm
-
P
4 50 mm 13 50 mm
Q c ( 3 )
gc l
MMQ DU −= (3)
MU MD 4(b)
lg (=900mm)
MU MD MOE
2 I
3.
3 . 1
5 P R
2 Pmax
R
2
6
6(a)~(c)
1/30rad
(a)
F12#12N
Pmax 6(a)
F12#12 1/20rad
6(b) F12#12N
1/10rad F12#12T
6 ( c )
1/75rad
1 /
6rad
F12-12 1/15rad
4(a) (b)
W/2 W/2 P
450
900
450
W/2 W/4 PW/4
─ 1481 ─
構造系 727号�
1/10rad
(b)
-2 0 ) 5 2 P 1 2 # 1 2
4P12#12#12N 4P12-12-12 3
7 4P12#12#12N
2
7
2
5
(d) 2P12#12N (e) 2P12#12
(a) F12#12N (b) F12#12
(g) F12-12
(c) F12#12T
(f) 4P12#12#12N
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
-0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2R (rad)
P (k
N)
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
-0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2R (rad)
P (k
N)
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
-0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2R (rad)
P (k
N)
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
-0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2R (rad)
P (k
N)
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
-0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2R (rad)
P (k
N)
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
-0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2R (rad)
P (k
N)
(h) 2P12-12 (i) 4P12-12-12
t = 200
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
-0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2
P (k
N)
R (rad)
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
-0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2R (rad)
P (k
N)
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
-0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2R (rad)
P (k
N)
2 Pmax Pmax, ,
6 (a)~(c) R=1/30, (d)~(f)(d) 2P12#12N(a) F12#12N (b) F12#12 (e) 2P12#12 (f) 4P12#12#12N(c) F12#12T 7
4P12#12#12N, kN m
3.4 4.6 5.2
1.2 1.8 1.1
-1/30rad
5.8 6.2 3.6
1.3 1.8 1.1
+1/30rad
1/200 1/120 1/100 1/75 1/50 1/30 1/20 1/15 1/10 1/8 1/6 1/5 1/4F12#12N 18.2 kNF12#12 18.5 kN
F12#12T 33.0 kNF12-12 15.8 kN
2P12#12N 6.7 kN 7.7 kN ( )
( ) 9.8 kN ( ) ( )
2P12-12 5.9 kN 11.4 kN ( )
( )
R (rad)
4P12-12-12
2P12#12
4P12#12#12N
─ 1482 ─
構造系 727号�
9
2P12#12N 6(d)
P
2P12#12 6(e) 2P12#12N
( ) ( )
4P12#12#12N 6(f)
( ) ( )
20) 2P12-12
P 4P12-
1 2 - 1 2 ( )
( )
3 2P12#12 -
3 ( a )
3 ( b )
3 . 2
(a)
8
( a ) ( b )
3 . 1
P
(b)
F12#12T
F12#12N 3(c )
F12#12T 200mm 90mm
110mm F12#12N 60mm
200/60 3.3 90/60=1.5
F12#12N 18.2kN F12#12T 33.0kN
33.0/18.2 1.8
3.3/1.8 1.8
1 .5 /1 .8
0 .8
9 F12#12T F12#12N P
1.5
0 .8
4 .
( ) 1 2 )
1 3 )
2
4 .1
8(a) F12#12N F12#12
60mm 1820mm
13), 22)
P
P m a x
P
1 3 )
P
P
( 4 )
0
10
20
30 F12#12T
0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2
P (k
N)
R (rad)
8(b) (a)
0
5
10
15
202P12#12N2P12#12
0 0.05 0.1 0.15
P (k
N)
R (rad)
0
5
10
15
20F12#12NF12#12
12)
0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2
P (k
N)
R (rad)
2 4P12#12#12N, R=+1/30,3 - 2P12#12, R=+1/20(a) (b)
─ 1483 ─
構造系 727号�
PhhP 2'= (4)
( 4 ) P
P P
P
2P12#12N F12#12N 2P12#12 F12#12 2P12-
12 F12-12 (4)
1 0
R h
(a), (b)
P m a x
( c )
11 P max
P m a x 4 P
2 P 2
2P12#12N 2P12-12
P
1.3
4 . 2
12 4P
1P(910mm) 2P(1820mm)
1:2:1
4 P
2
0
1 3
Q c R
R u 5
0
2 P 1 2 # 1 2 4 P 1 2 - 1 2 - 1 2
2 4 .4
1 4
x c (5 )
cc xhEIQ 31
3= (5)
E h 1
14 x c
( 5 ) E I
4P12#12#12N
15 4P12#12#12N
R
1 6
4P12#12#12N (3) Q c
1 MOE
2 I
1 11 0(b) 2P12#12(a) 2P12#12N (c) 2P12-12
0
5
10
152P12#12N
0 0.05 0.1
P, P
' (kN
)
Rh (rad)
0
5
10
152P12#12
0 0.05 0.1R
h (rad)
P, P
' (kN
)
0
5
10
152P12-12
0 0.05 0.1R
h (rad)
P, P
' (kN
)
0
5
10
15
20
P max
, P' m
ax (k
N)
2P12-12
4P12-12-12
2P12#12
4P12#12#12N
2P12#12N
─ 1484 ─
構造系 727号�
1 54P12#12#12N,
1 64P12#12#12N
4 . 3
(a)
1 7
A B C D
h=3870mm
h1=1800mm hs=270mm
h 2=1800mm 2
RAB RBC RCD
2
A D
RAB<RBC<RCD
1 7 δ c ( 6 )
1BCCD hRuc ⋅−=δ (6)
C D
uCD 4P12#12#12N 18
uCD 19 δc uCD
δ c
( 6 )
RBC
(6 ) δ c
Q c (7 )
cc hIMOEQ δ3
1
3 ⋅= (7)
20 4P12#12#12N (3) (7)
Qc (b), (c)
( 7 ) ( 3 )
(a )
R=0.03rad
R B C -
(b)
21 δ (8)~(11)
csw δδδδ ++= (8)
hRw ⋅= ABδ (9)
( ) ( )1ABBC hhRR ss +⋅−=δ (10)
( ) 1BCCD hRRc ⋅−=δ (11)
δ w δ s
δ c
δ w
δ c
δ (=δw+δ c) (10)
δ s
δ δ s
22 4P12#12#12N δ
(10) δ s
δs 4 2
4 . 4
MOR
1 2 1 4
0
0.5
1
0 0.05 0.1R (rad)
910 9101820
xc xc xc
E1I1 E2I2 E3I3 00.10.20.30.40.50.6
1 3(a) 2P12#12 (b) 4P12#12#12N (c) 4P12-12-12
0
5
10
0 0.05 0.1 0.15
Qc (k
N)
R (rad)
Ru
0
5
10
0 0.05 0.1 0.15
Qc (k
N)
R (rad)
Ru 0
5
10
0 0.05 0.1 0.15
Qc (k
N)
R (rad)
Ru
─ 1485 ─
構造系 727号�
P c r
( 1 2 )
1hFZP be
cr = (12)
Ze Z Ze=0.75Z
F b
Z
Ze 0.61Z
0.68Z 0.75Z
m a x σ t
(13)~(16)
mnwt σσσσ ++=max (13)
ew AW /i−=σ (14)
)/()( en AlhP ⋅⋅−=σ (15)
)/()( eAlhP ⋅⋅
0
em ZM /fmax=σ (16)
tσmax W wσ
nσ
mσ 3
W
W i
A e Z e
l
maxM f
σ w σ n
σ m 1
2 3
ma xσ t MOR
7
1 2 MOR
m a xσ t
MOR maxσ t
MOR
m a x σ t
20) 2P12#12 4P12-12-12
( 1 2 )
4 . 5
4P12#12#12N 12
23 max tM O R
2 1
h2
h1
h
D
A
Bhs
RAB
RBC-RAB RCD-RBC
C
δ
δcδsδw
2 2 s4P12#12#12N,
0
0.5
1
0 0.05 0.1
δ s/δ
R (rad)
0102030405060
MOR
max
σ t, M
OR
(N/m
m2 )
4P12#12#12N 4P12-12-122P12#12
1 7 c
20 Qc 4P12#12#12N, , ()(a) (b) (c)
18 uCD4P12#12#12N
h2
hs
h1
h
D
A
BC
RBC
uCD δc
δ
1 9 c4P12#12#12N
050
100150200250300
0 0.05 0.1
δ c (mm
)
R (rad)
050
100150200250300
0 0.05 0.1R (rad)
u CD (m
m)
0
5
10(3)(7)
0 0.05 0.1R (rad)
Qc (k
N)
(+)
0
5
10(3)(7)
0 0.05 0.1R (rad)
Qc (k
N)
(+)
0
5
10(3)(7)
0 0.05 0.1
Qc (k
N)
R (rad)
(-)
─ 1486 ─
構造系 727号�
2
12) 23)
F12#12N 1/15rad 1
(12) Ze 0.68Z
0.61Z Fb 23 maxσt
24 4P12#12#12N
2
3
( )
(a) 0.02rad
P m a x
0 .6
(b) 0.01rad
( )
Pmax 0.8
0.01rad
0
4 . 2
4 . 3
5.
8 0 %
1/15rad24) ( ) 25)
8 0 %
P 8 0%
R R u
25 Ru
2 6
R u (a)
1/20rad Ru
1/10rad 10kN P
F12-12 Pmax
Ru 1/10rad
P F12#12N F12#12T
(b ) 4 P 2 P
1/15rad 2P P
2 P
27 Ru
2 P 3
24 4P12#12#12N, ,2 5 Ru
2P12#12N
2 6 R u 2 7 R u
(a) (b)
0
10
20
30 F12#12NF12#12F12#12TF12-12
0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2
P (k
N)
R (rad)
1/30 1/150
5
10
152P12#12N2P12#124P12#12#12N2P12-124P12-12-12
0 0.05 0.1 0.15
P (k
N)
R (rad)
1/30 1/15 00.020.040.060.080.1
0.12R
u
R (r
ad)
1/30
1/15
2P12-12 4P12-12-122P12#12 4P12#12#12N2P12#12N
0
5
10
0 0.05 0.1 0.15
P (k
N)
R (rad)
Pmax
0.8Pmax
Ru
(a) (b)
0
5
10
15
0 0.05 0.1
P (k
N)
R (rad)
0
5
10
15
0 0.05 0.1
P (k
N)
R (rad)
─ 1487 ─
構造系 727号�
Ru 1/10rad 4P 2
1/30rad Ru 1/15rad
6.
12),13)
1)
1 . 8
0 . 8
2)
3)
80%
1/15rad
4)
a)
b) - 2 0 )
c)
d)
2 4
JSPS 15H02275
( )
1) , , , , : , , Vol.19, No.43, pp.909-912,
2013.10.
2) , , , , , 582 ,
pp.95-102, 2004.8.3) , , , ,
, , 602 , pp.187-194, 2006.4.
4) , , , 3, , , III,
pp.507-508, 2006.9.5) , , , ,
, 1, , III, pp.423-424, 2007.8.
6) , , , , , 620 , pp.93-100, 2007.10.
7) , , , , , , 1,
, III, pp.37-38, 2008.9.8) , , , , 1,
, III, pp.15-16, 2008.9.
9) , , , , - -, III, pp.445-446, 2011.8.
10) , , , ,
Vol.19, No.42, pp.525-530, 2013.6.11) 9
, , III, pp.367-376, 2005.9.12) ( ) ,
http://www.bunka.go.jp/seisaku/bunkazai/hogofukyu/pdf/kokko_hojyo_taisin13.pdf,2015.9.2
13) ( ) ,pp.151-163, 2012.6.
14) , , , 8, , III, pp.157-158,
1999.9.15) , , , 9,
, III,pp.145-146, 2000.9.
16) , , , , , , , , III,
pp.565-566, 2009.8.17) ( ) , http://www.maruhiro.jp/product/sekou.pdf
2015.10.618) :
, , p.83, 2004.3.
19) , , , : , , No.32, pp.399-
404, 2010.2.20) , , , , ,
, , Vol.21, No.49, pp.1031-1036, 2015.10.
21) , , : 2 , , 78 , No.685, pp.513-520, 2013.3.
22) ,pp.65-66, 2013.2.
23) , p.395, 2006.12.24) ( )
, http://www.howtec.or.jp/test/downloadfiles/st_gyouhou2.pdf, 2015.9.225) ( )
, pp.2-28, 2005.3.
─ 1488 ─
構造系 727号�
EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON SEISMIC PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF TRADITIONAL TIMBER FRAME STRUCTURES WITH LARGE HANGING WALLS
Saki OHMURA* Yasuhiro NAMBU** Yoshihiro SHIBUYA***
Mina SUGINO**** and Yasuhiro HAYASHI*****
*Graduate Student, Dept. of Architecture and Architectural Eng., Kyoto Univ.
**Graduate Student, Dept. of Architecture and Architectural Eng., Kyoto Univ., M. Eng., JSPS Research Fellow, DC1
***Kansai Electric Power Co., Inc., M. Eng.
****Assist. Prof., Dept. of Architecture and Architectural Eng., Kyoto Univ., Dr. Eng.
*****Prof., Dept. of Architecture and Architectural Eng., Kyoto Univ., Dr. Eng.
In Japan, there are a lot of traditional timber buildings which fit the history, the culture and the environment in each area. In our
investigation of traditional timber houses in the important district of groups of historic buildings, mud walls which have various
specifications and crosspieces called Nuki and structures which consist of tall hanging walls and beams called Sashigamoi (called
large hanging walls in this study) were found. Timber frame structures with hanging walls are very important factor to think of seismic
safety of timber buildings because they can lead to collapse of the whole buildings by breakage of columns at joints of the lower end
of hanging walls. Although static loading tests and shaking table tests of timber frames with hanging walls have been conducted, the
failure behavior and deformation performance have not been analyzed in detail.
As the current methods of seismic capacity evaluation, “Implementation Guidance for Basic Seismic Assessment of Important
Cultural Properties (Buildings)” proposed by Agency for Cultural Affairs and “Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit Methods of Wooden
Houses” proposed by the Japan Building Disaster Prevention Association have been used. Although the consistency between the
current methods and the test results has been examined, the hanging walls of the specimens are not tall and the analysis is not enough
about shear force and deformation performance of the columns, flexural strength of the columns and limit deformation evaluation of
the frame structures with hanging walls.
Therefore, the purpose of this study is demonstrative elucidation of dynamic characteristics of timber frame structures with large
hanging walls in order to construct a reasonable and practical seismic evaluation method. First, we conduct static loading tests of
timber frame structures with full walls or large hanging walls. The height of the full wall specimens and the large hanging wall
specimens is 2.70m and 3.87m, respectively. The span length of the specimens is 1.82m. The height of hanging walls is 1.80m. The
specification of walls and the number of spans are experimental variables. Second, we analyze damage states and mechanical
characteristics of the specimens and their elements such as mud wall, columns and Sashigamoi. Finally, we reveal the applicability
and problems of the current methods based on the test results.
The major findings obtained from the research are summarized as follows:
a) Different specifications of Nuki do not make much difference of the hysteresis characteristics of the full wall specimens in
spite of the different failure states of walls.
b) The hysteresis characteristics of the large hanging walls can be calculated using the hysteresis characteristics of the full wall
specimens which have the same specification of wall.
c) Timber frames with hanging walls do not lose the restoring force immediately after breakage of columns because the broken
columns have the restoring force. Within this study, rotational angle of the specimens is more than about 1/15 rad when the
restoring force decreases to 80% of the maximum value.
d) Shear force of a column is not depend on only the sum of half of the distances from the column to the adjacent columns on the
both sides, because shear force is affected by the sectional performance and Young’s modulus of the column, the location of
the column against the loading direction and breakage of the surrounding columns. In addition, we indicated that it is need to
consider rotational deformation of columns at column-Sashigamoi joints in evaluation of deformation of timber frames with
hanging walls. From the above, it is revealed that there is room for improvement on the current methods in seismic
performance evaluation of timber frames with large hanging walls.
EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON SEISMIC PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF TRADITIONAL TIMBER FRAME STRUCTURES WITH LARGE HANGING WALLS
Saki OHMURA*, Yasuhiro NAMBU**, Yoshihiro SHIBUYA***, Mina SUGINO**** and Yasuhiro HAYASHI*****
* Grad. Stud., Dept. of Architecture and Architectural Eng., Kyoto Univ. ** Grad. Stud., Dept. of Architecture and Architectural Eng., Kyoto Univ., M.Eng.,
JSPS Research Fellow, DC1 *** Kansai Electric Power Co., Inc., M.Eng.
**** Assist. Prof., Dept. of Architecture and Architectural Eng., Kyoto Univ., Dr.Eng. ***** Prof., Dept. of Architecture and Architectural Eng., Kyoto Univ., Dr.Eng.
(2015 年 10 月 8 日原稿受理,2016 年 5 月 24 日採用決定)
─ 1489 ─
構造系 727号�
構造系 727号�