12
The objective of this study is demonstrative elucidation of mechanical characteristics of timber frame structures with large hanging walls in order to construct a reasonable and practical seismic evaluation method. First, we conduct static loading tests of timber frame structures with full walls or large hanging walls which have different specifications of walls and the number of spans. Second, we analyze damage states and mechanical characteristics of the specimens and their elements such as mud wall, columns and Sashigamoi. Finally, we reveal the applicability and problems of the current methods based on the test results. Keywords: Traditional Timber Building, Static Loading Test, Large Hanging Wall, Seismic Performance Evaluation, Deformation Capacity , , , , 1. 1) 1 2)~10) 11) ( ) 12) 13) 14)~16) 1 (a) (b) 大垂壁を有する伝統木造軸組架構の耐震性能評価に関する実験的研究 EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON SEISMIC PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF TRADITIONAL TIMBER FRAME STRUCTURES WITH LARGE HANGING WALLS 大村早紀 ,南 部 恭 広 ** ,澁 谷 悦 敬 *** ,杉 野 未 奈 **** ,林 康裕 ***** Saki OHMURA, Yasuhiro NAMBU, Yoshihiro SHIBUYA, Mina SUGINO and Yasuhiro HAYASHI 京都大学大学院工学研究科建築学専攻 修士課程 ** 京都大学大学院工学研究科建築学専攻 博士後期課程・修士(工学) 日本学術振興会特別研究員 DC1 *** 関西電力㈱(元 京都大学大学院生)・修士(工学) **** 京都大学大学院工学研究科建築学専攻 助教・博士(工学) ***** 京都大学大学院工学研究科建築学専攻 教授・工博 Grad. Stud., Dept. of Architecture and Architectural Eng., Kyoto Univ. Grad. Stud., Dept. of Architecture and Architectural Eng., Kyoto Univ., M.Eng., JSPS Research Fellow, DC1 Kansai Electric Power Co., Inc., M.Eng. Assist. Prof., Dept. of Architecture and Architectural Eng., Kyoto Univ., Dr.Eng. Prof., Dept. of Architecture and Architectural Eng., Kyoto Univ., Dr.Eng. 日本建築学会構造系論文集 第81巻 第727号, 1479-1489, 2016年9月 J. Struct. Constr. Eng., AIJ, Vol. 81 No. 727, 1479-1489, Sep., 2016 DOI http://doi.org/10.3130/aijs.81.1479 【カテゴリーⅠ】 ─ 1479 ─ 構造系 727 号

大垂壁を有する伝統木造軸組架構の耐震性能評価に …2. 9 2 2.1 0è9 / W1 _0è9 / b M0t &g M r S /²1 _ 0è9 / b Ù ] í' 3U 5 5 W í b q X > | g7ü$× 9 ì b ¡

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 大垂壁を有する伝統木造軸組架構の耐震性能評価に …2. 9 2 2.1 0è9 / W1 _0è9 / b M0t &g M r S /²1 _ 0è9 / b Ù ] í' 3U 5 5 W í b q X > | g7ü$× 9 ì b ¡

EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON SEISMIC PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF TRADITIONAL TIMBER FRAME STRUCTURES WITH LARGE HANGING WALLS

* ** *** **** *****

Saki OHMURA, Yasuhiro NAMBU, Yoshihiro SHIBUYA, Mina SUGINO and Yasuhiro HAYASHI

The objective of this study is demonstrative elucidation of mechanical characteristics of timber frame structures with large hangingwalls in order to construct a reasonable and practical seismic evaluation method. First, we conduct static loading tests of timber framestructures with full walls or large hanging walls which have different specifications of walls and the number of spans. Second, weanalyze damage states and mechanical characteristics of the specimens and their elements such as mud wall, columns and Sashigamoi.Finally, we reveal the applicability and problems of the current methods based on the test results.

Keywords: Traditional Timber Building, Static Loading Test, Large Hanging Wall,Seismic Performance Evaluation, Deformation Capacity

, , , ,

Graduate Student, Dept. of Architecture and Architectural Eng., Kyoto Univ.Graduate Student, Dept. of Architecture and Architectural Eng., Kyoto Univ., M. Eng.,JSPS Research Fellow, DC1Kansai Electric Power Co., Inc., M. Eng.Assist. Prof., Dept. of Architecture and Architectural Eng., Kyoto Univ., Dr. Eng.Prof., Dept. of Architecture and Architectural Eng., Kyoto Univ., Dr. Eng.

***

*******

*****

( )DC1

( )( )

1.

1) 1

2)~10)

1 1 )

(

) 1 2 )

1 3 )

1 4 ) ~ 1 6 )

1(a) (b)

大垂壁を有する伝統木造軸組架構の耐震性能評価に関する実験的研究EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON SEISMIC PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

OF TRADITIONAL TIMBER FRAME STRUCTURES WITH LARGE HANGING WALLS

大 村 早 紀*,南 部 恭 広**,澁 谷 悦 敬***,杉 野 未 奈****,林   康 裕*****

Saki OHMURA, Yasuhiro NAMBU, Yoshihiro SHIBUYA, Mina SUGINO and Yasuhiro HAYASHI

    *  京都大学大学院工学研究科建築学専攻 修士課程   **  京都大学大学院工学研究科建築学専攻 博士後期課程・修士(工学)

日本学術振興会特別研究員 DC1  ***  関西電力㈱(元 京都大学大学院生)・修士(工学) ****  京都大学大学院工学研究科建築学専攻 助教・博士(工学)*****  京都大学大学院工学研究科建築学専攻 教授・工博

Grad. Stud., Dept. of Architecture and Architectural Eng., Kyoto Univ.Grad. Stud., Dept. of Architecture and Architectural Eng., Kyoto Univ., M.Eng., JSPS Research Fellow, DC1Kansai Electric Power Co., Inc., M.Eng.Assist. Prof., Dept. of Architecture and Architectural Eng., Kyoto Univ., Dr.Eng.Prof., Dept. of Architecture and Architectural Eng., Kyoto Univ., Dr.Eng.

日本建築学会構造系論文集 第81巻 第727号,1479-1489, 2016年9月J. Struct. Constr. Eng., AIJ, Vol. 81 No. 727, 1479-1489, Sep., 2016

DOI http://doi.org/10.3130/aijs.81.1479【カテゴリーⅠ】�

─ 1479 ─

構造系 727号�

Page 2: 大垂壁を有する伝統木造軸組架構の耐震性能評価に …2. 9 2 2.1 0è9 / W1 _0è9 / b M0t &g M r S /²1 _ 0è9 / b Ù ] í' 3U 5 5 W í b q X > | g7ü$× 9 ì b ¡

2.

2 .1

1 1

W

1 9

1

2

2700mm 1820mm

3870mm 1800mm

1 8 2 0 mm

120 120mm 120 240mm 120

270mm

E 9 0

V P

2 -

1 7 ) 2

F

2 P 4 P

c m # -

N 40mm 60mm

T 40mm 200mm

15mm 60mm

(a)

3 3 6

1(a)~(c) 3 15mm

1 1(d)~(f)

2 15mm 1

120mm 30mm

4P12#12#12N

3

1

3 3(a),

(b) 18) (=60mm)

3 ( c )19) 200mm

3 (a ) 4 0mm

3(b) 15mm

3 0 m m

18mm 30mm

3 ( c )

30mm 75mm

110mm

(a) F12#12N (b) F12#12

(g) F12-12

1820

2700

(d) 2P12#12N (e) 2P12#12

1820

1800

1800

3870

270

1820

(f) 4P12#12#12N

1 mm

1820

300600

600600

600

(c) F12#12T

1820

450900

900450

1820 1820 1820

600600

600

1820

1820 1820

600600

600

(h) 2P12-12 (i) 4P12-12-12

1 W

3 mm

(a) F12#12N2P12#12N

4P12#12#12N

(b) F12#122P12#12

(c) F12#12T

2mm

(a) (b)

220

270

6812

63012

0

135

135

270

30

67.5

67.5

MOE MOR(mm) (kg/m3) (kN/mm2) (N/mm2)

443 9.7 51.0411 8.1 52.0438 9.7 59.1403 9.8 56.8407 8.3 35.1421 8.1 55.3398 6.8 47.3466 7.2 46.2440 7.7 38.5403 8.2 44.6439 6.8 41.8387 8.0 39.2421 6.6 41.4423 7.7 56.9434 8.8 62.4440 7.9 45.7398 8.3 39.9438 8.6 51.7384 7.6 42.0406 8.0 45.7

F12-12

W(kN)(mm) (mm)

25.7

60 15

60 40

15

18

40

60 40

60

200

2P12#12N

25.7

25.7

25.7

4P12-12-12 26 18 51.1

25.7

18 25.726

51.1

2P12#12

60 40

120×120

120×120

120×120

25.72P12-12 26

F12#12N

F12#12T

F12#12

4P12#12#12N 120×120

120×120

120×120

120×120

(kN)

5.0

4.6

14.2

3.9

4.2

7.5

1.6

2.1

3.5

120×120

120×120

11030200

15

120

10

90

120

3030 60

1510

120

120

15 15

3030 60

15

120

120

─ 1480 ─

構造系 727号�

Page 3: 大垂壁を有する伝統木造軸組架構の耐震性能評価に …2. 9 2 2.1 0è9 / W1 _0è9 / b M0t &g M r S /²1 _ 0è9 / b Ù ] í' 3U 5 5 W í b q X > | g7ü$× 9 ì b ¡

(b)

1 2 3

1(g) F12-12 4 26mm17) 5

30mm

45mm 1(h),(i)

2 3

4P12-

12-12

2P12-12 4P12-12-1220 )

(c )

3

MOE MOR

14 1680mm

1 2

1440mm 1

2 . 2

4

1

W 4

2 1 )

4(a)

HD-B10

2

1/200 1/120 1/100 1/75 1/50 1/30 1/20 1/15 1/

10 1/8 1/6 1/5 1/4rad 1/

200rad

R ( 1 )

hR /δ= (1)

δ

h h =2700mm

h =3870mm

R h ( 2 )

2/ hR hh δ= (2)

δh h 2

h 2=1800mm

-

P

4 50 mm 13 50 mm

Q c ( 3 )

gc l

MMQ DU −= (3)

MU MD 4(b)

lg (=900mm)

MU MD MOE

2 I

3.

3 . 1

5 P R

2 Pmax

R

2

6

6(a)~(c)

1/30rad

(a)

F12#12N

Pmax 6(a)

F12#12 1/20rad

6(b) F12#12N

1/10rad F12#12T

6 ( c )

1/75rad

1 /

6rad

F12-12 1/15rad

4(a) (b)

W/2 W/2 P

450

900

450

W/2 W/4 PW/4

─ 1481 ─

構造系 727号�

Page 4: 大垂壁を有する伝統木造軸組架構の耐震性能評価に …2. 9 2 2.1 0è9 / W1 _0è9 / b M0t &g M r S /²1 _ 0è9 / b Ù ] í' 3U 5 5 W í b q X > | g7ü$× 9 ì b ¡

1/10rad

(b)

-2 0 ) 5 2 P 1 2 # 1 2

4P12#12#12N 4P12-12-12 3

7 4P12#12#12N

2

7

2

5

(d) 2P12#12N (e) 2P12#12

(a) F12#12N (b) F12#12

(g) F12-12

(c) F12#12T

(f) 4P12#12#12N

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

-0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2R (rad)

P (k

N)

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30

-0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2R (rad)

P (k

N)

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30

-0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2R (rad)

P (k

N)

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

-0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2R (rad)

P (k

N)

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

-0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2R (rad)

P (k

N)

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

-0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2R (rad)

P (k

N)

(h) 2P12-12 (i) 4P12-12-12

t = 200

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30

-0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2

P (k

N)

R (rad)

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30

-0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2R (rad)

P (k

N)

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

-0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2R (rad)

P (k

N)

2 Pmax Pmax, ,

6 (a)~(c) R=1/30, (d)~(f)(d) 2P12#12N(a) F12#12N (b) F12#12 (e) 2P12#12 (f) 4P12#12#12N(c) F12#12T 7

4P12#12#12N, kN m

3.4 4.6 5.2

1.2 1.8 1.1

-1/30rad

5.8 6.2 3.6

1.3 1.8 1.1

+1/30rad

1/200 1/120 1/100 1/75 1/50 1/30 1/20 1/15 1/10 1/8 1/6 1/5 1/4F12#12N 18.2 kNF12#12 18.5 kN

F12#12T 33.0 kNF12-12 15.8 kN

2P12#12N 6.7 kN 7.7 kN ( )

( ) 9.8 kN ( ) ( )

2P12-12 5.9 kN 11.4 kN ( )

( )

R (rad)

4P12-12-12

2P12#12

4P12#12#12N

─ 1482 ─

構造系 727号�

Page 5: 大垂壁を有する伝統木造軸組架構の耐震性能評価に …2. 9 2 2.1 0è9 / W1 _0è9 / b M0t &g M r S /²1 _ 0è9 / b Ù ] í' 3U 5 5 W í b q X > | g7ü$× 9 ì b ¡

9

2P12#12N 6(d)

P

2P12#12 6(e) 2P12#12N

( ) ( )

4P12#12#12N 6(f)

( ) ( )

20) 2P12-12

P 4P12-

1 2 - 1 2 ( )

( )

3 2P12#12 -

3 ( a )

3 ( b )

3 . 2

(a)

8

( a ) ( b )

3 . 1

P

(b)

F12#12T

F12#12N 3(c )

F12#12T 200mm 90mm

110mm F12#12N 60mm

200/60 3.3 90/60=1.5

F12#12N 18.2kN F12#12T 33.0kN

33.0/18.2 1.8

3.3/1.8 1.8

1 .5 /1 .8

0 .8

9 F12#12T F12#12N P

1.5

0 .8

4 .

( ) 1 2 )

1 3 )

2

4 .1

8(a) F12#12N F12#12

60mm 1820mm

13), 22)

P

P m a x

P

1 3 )

P

P

( 4 )

0

10

20

30 F12#12T

0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2

P (k

N)

R (rad)

8(b) (a)

0

5

10

15

202P12#12N2P12#12

0 0.05 0.1 0.15

P (k

N)

R (rad)

0

5

10

15

20F12#12NF12#12

12)

0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2

P (k

N)

R (rad)

2 4P12#12#12N, R=+1/30,3 - 2P12#12, R=+1/20(a) (b)

─ 1483 ─

構造系 727号�

Page 6: 大垂壁を有する伝統木造軸組架構の耐震性能評価に …2. 9 2 2.1 0è9 / W1 _0è9 / b M0t &g M r S /²1 _ 0è9 / b Ù ] í' 3U 5 5 W í b q X > | g7ü$× 9 ì b ¡

PhhP 2'= (4)

( 4 ) P

P P

P

2P12#12N F12#12N 2P12#12 F12#12 2P12-

12 F12-12 (4)

1 0

R h

(a), (b)

P m a x

( c )

11 P max

P m a x 4 P

2 P 2

2P12#12N 2P12-12

P

1.3

4 . 2

12 4P

1P(910mm) 2P(1820mm)

1:2:1

4 P

2

0

1 3

Q c R

R u 5

0

2 P 1 2 # 1 2 4 P 1 2 - 1 2 - 1 2

2 4 .4

1 4

x c (5 )

cc xhEIQ 31

3= (5)

E h 1

14 x c

( 5 ) E I

4P12#12#12N

15 4P12#12#12N

R

1 6

4P12#12#12N (3) Q c

1 MOE

2 I

1 11 0(b) 2P12#12(a) 2P12#12N (c) 2P12-12

0

5

10

152P12#12N

0 0.05 0.1

P, P

' (kN

)

Rh (rad)

0

5

10

152P12#12

0 0.05 0.1R

h (rad)

P, P

' (kN

)

0

5

10

152P12-12

0 0.05 0.1R

h (rad)

P, P

' (kN

)

0

5

10

15

20

P max

, P' m

ax (k

N)

2P12-12

4P12-12-12

2P12#12

4P12#12#12N

2P12#12N

─ 1484 ─

構造系 727号�

Page 7: 大垂壁を有する伝統木造軸組架構の耐震性能評価に …2. 9 2 2.1 0è9 / W1 _0è9 / b M0t &g M r S /²1 _ 0è9 / b Ù ] í' 3U 5 5 W í b q X > | g7ü$× 9 ì b ¡

1 54P12#12#12N,

1 64P12#12#12N

4 . 3

(a)

1 7

A B C D

h=3870mm

h1=1800mm hs=270mm

h 2=1800mm 2

RAB RBC RCD

2

A D

RAB<RBC<RCD

1 7 δ c ( 6 )

1BCCD hRuc ⋅−=δ (6)

C D

uCD 4P12#12#12N 18

uCD 19 δc uCD

δ c

( 6 )

RBC

(6 ) δ c

Q c (7 )

cc hIMOEQ δ3

1

3 ⋅= (7)

20 4P12#12#12N (3) (7)

Qc (b), (c)

( 7 ) ( 3 )

(a )

R=0.03rad

R B C -

(b)

21 δ (8)~(11)

csw δδδδ ++= (8)

hRw ⋅= ABδ (9)

( ) ( )1ABBC hhRR ss +⋅−=δ (10)

( ) 1BCCD hRRc ⋅−=δ (11)

δ w δ s

δ c

δ w

δ c

δ (=δw+δ c) (10)

δ s

δ δ s

22 4P12#12#12N δ

(10) δ s

δs 4 2

4 . 4

MOR

1 2 1 4

0

0.5

1

0 0.05 0.1R (rad)

910 9101820

xc xc xc

E1I1 E2I2 E3I3 00.10.20.30.40.50.6

1 3(a) 2P12#12 (b) 4P12#12#12N (c) 4P12-12-12

0

5

10

0 0.05 0.1 0.15

Qc (k

N)

R (rad)

Ru

0

5

10

0 0.05 0.1 0.15

Qc (k

N)

R (rad)

Ru 0

5

10

0 0.05 0.1 0.15

Qc (k

N)

R (rad)

Ru

─ 1485 ─

構造系 727号�

Page 8: 大垂壁を有する伝統木造軸組架構の耐震性能評価に …2. 9 2 2.1 0è9 / W1 _0è9 / b M0t &g M r S /²1 _ 0è9 / b Ù ] í' 3U 5 5 W í b q X > | g7ü$× 9 ì b ¡

P c r

( 1 2 )

1hFZP be

cr = (12)

Ze Z Ze=0.75Z

F b

Z

Ze 0.61Z

0.68Z 0.75Z

m a x σ t

(13)~(16)

mnwt σσσσ ++=max (13)

ew AW /i−=σ (14)

)/()( en AlhP ⋅⋅−=σ (15)

)/()( eAlhP ⋅⋅

0

em ZM /fmax=σ (16)

tσmax W wσ

mσ 3

W

W i

A e Z e

l

maxM f

σ w σ n

σ m 1

2 3

ma xσ t MOR

7

1 2 MOR

m a xσ t

MOR maxσ t

MOR

m a x σ t

20) 2P12#12 4P12-12-12

( 1 2 )

4 . 5

4P12#12#12N 12

23 max tM O R

2 1

h2

h1

h

D

A

Bhs

RAB

RBC-RAB RCD-RBC

C

δ

δcδsδw

2 2 s4P12#12#12N,

0

0.5

1

0 0.05 0.1

δ s/δ

R (rad)

0102030405060

MOR

max

σ t, M

OR

(N/m

m2 )

4P12#12#12N 4P12-12-122P12#12

1 7 c

20 Qc 4P12#12#12N, , ()(a) (b) (c)

18 uCD4P12#12#12N

h2

hs

h1

h

D

A

BC

RBC

uCD δc

δ

1 9 c4P12#12#12N

050

100150200250300

0 0.05 0.1

δ c (mm

)

R (rad)

050

100150200250300

0 0.05 0.1R (rad)

u CD (m

m)

0

5

10(3)(7)

0 0.05 0.1R (rad)

Qc (k

N)

(+)

0

5

10(3)(7)

0 0.05 0.1R (rad)

Qc (k

N)

(+)

0

5

10(3)(7)

0 0.05 0.1

Qc (k

N)

R (rad)

(-)

─ 1486 ─

構造系 727号�

Page 9: 大垂壁を有する伝統木造軸組架構の耐震性能評価に …2. 9 2 2.1 0è9 / W1 _0è9 / b M0t &g M r S /²1 _ 0è9 / b Ù ] í' 3U 5 5 W í b q X > | g7ü$× 9 ì b ¡

2

12) 23)

F12#12N 1/15rad 1

(12) Ze 0.68Z

0.61Z Fb 23 maxσt

24 4P12#12#12N

2

3

( )

(a) 0.02rad

P m a x

0 .6

(b) 0.01rad

( )

Pmax 0.8

0.01rad

0

4 . 2

4 . 3

5.

8 0 %

1/15rad24) ( ) 25)

8 0 %

P 8 0%

R R u

25 Ru

2 6

R u (a)

1/20rad Ru

1/10rad 10kN P

F12-12 Pmax

Ru 1/10rad

P F12#12N F12#12T

(b ) 4 P 2 P

1/15rad 2P P

2 P

27 Ru

2 P 3

24 4P12#12#12N, ,2 5 Ru

2P12#12N

2 6 R u 2 7 R u

(a) (b)

0

10

20

30 F12#12NF12#12F12#12TF12-12

0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2

P (k

N)

R (rad)

1/30 1/150

5

10

152P12#12N2P12#124P12#12#12N2P12-124P12-12-12

0 0.05 0.1 0.15

P (k

N)

R (rad)

1/30 1/15 00.020.040.060.080.1

0.12R

u

R (r

ad)

1/30

1/15

2P12-12 4P12-12-122P12#12 4P12#12#12N2P12#12N

0

5

10

0 0.05 0.1 0.15

P (k

N)

R (rad)

Pmax

0.8Pmax

Ru

(a) (b)

0

5

10

15

0 0.05 0.1

P (k

N)

R (rad)

0

5

10

15

0 0.05 0.1

P (k

N)

R (rad)

─ 1487 ─

構造系 727号�

Page 10: 大垂壁を有する伝統木造軸組架構の耐震性能評価に …2. 9 2 2.1 0è9 / W1 _0è9 / b M0t &g M r S /²1 _ 0è9 / b Ù ] í' 3U 5 5 W í b q X > | g7ü$× 9 ì b ¡

Ru 1/10rad 4P 2

1/30rad Ru 1/15rad

6.

12),13)

1)

1 . 8

0 . 8

2)

3)

80%

1/15rad

4)

a)

b) - 2 0 )

c)

d)

2 4

JSPS 15H02275

( )

1) , , , , : , , Vol.19, No.43, pp.909-912,

2013.10.

2) , , , , , 582 ,

pp.95-102, 2004.8.3) , , , ,

, , 602 , pp.187-194, 2006.4.

4) , , , 3, , , III,

pp.507-508, 2006.9.5) , , , ,

, 1, , III, pp.423-424, 2007.8.

6) , , , , , 620 , pp.93-100, 2007.10.

7) , , , , , , 1,

, III, pp.37-38, 2008.9.8) , , , , 1,

, III, pp.15-16, 2008.9.

9) , , , , - -, III, pp.445-446, 2011.8.

10) , , , ,

Vol.19, No.42, pp.525-530, 2013.6.11) 9

, , III, pp.367-376, 2005.9.12) ( ) ,

http://www.bunka.go.jp/seisaku/bunkazai/hogofukyu/pdf/kokko_hojyo_taisin13.pdf,2015.9.2

13) ( ) ,pp.151-163, 2012.6.

14) , , , 8, , III, pp.157-158,

1999.9.15) , , , 9,

, III,pp.145-146, 2000.9.

16) , , , , , , , , III,

pp.565-566, 2009.8.17) ( ) , http://www.maruhiro.jp/product/sekou.pdf

2015.10.618) :

, , p.83, 2004.3.

19) , , , : , , No.32, pp.399-

404, 2010.2.20) , , , , ,

, , Vol.21, No.49, pp.1031-1036, 2015.10.

21) , , : 2 , , 78 , No.685, pp.513-520, 2013.3.

22) ,pp.65-66, 2013.2.

23) , p.395, 2006.12.24) ( )

, http://www.howtec.or.jp/test/downloadfiles/st_gyouhou2.pdf, 2015.9.225) ( )

, pp.2-28, 2005.3.

─ 1488 ─

構造系 727号�

Page 11: 大垂壁を有する伝統木造軸組架構の耐震性能評価に …2. 9 2 2.1 0è9 / W1 _0è9 / b M0t &g M r S /²1 _ 0è9 / b Ù ] í' 3U 5 5 W í b q X > | g7ü$× 9 ì b ¡

EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON SEISMIC PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF TRADITIONAL TIMBER FRAME STRUCTURES WITH LARGE HANGING WALLS

Saki OHMURA* Yasuhiro NAMBU** Yoshihiro SHIBUYA***

Mina SUGINO**** and Yasuhiro HAYASHI*****

*Graduate Student, Dept. of Architecture and Architectural Eng., Kyoto Univ.

**Graduate Student, Dept. of Architecture and Architectural Eng., Kyoto Univ., M. Eng., JSPS Research Fellow, DC1

***Kansai Electric Power Co., Inc., M. Eng.

****Assist. Prof., Dept. of Architecture and Architectural Eng., Kyoto Univ., Dr. Eng.

*****Prof., Dept. of Architecture and Architectural Eng., Kyoto Univ., Dr. Eng.

In Japan, there are a lot of traditional timber buildings which fit the history, the culture and the environment in each area. In our

investigation of traditional timber houses in the important district of groups of historic buildings, mud walls which have various

specifications and crosspieces called Nuki and structures which consist of tall hanging walls and beams called Sashigamoi (called

large hanging walls in this study) were found. Timber frame structures with hanging walls are very important factor to think of seismic

safety of timber buildings because they can lead to collapse of the whole buildings by breakage of columns at joints of the lower end

of hanging walls. Although static loading tests and shaking table tests of timber frames with hanging walls have been conducted, the

failure behavior and deformation performance have not been analyzed in detail.

As the current methods of seismic capacity evaluation, “Implementation Guidance for Basic Seismic Assessment of Important

Cultural Properties (Buildings)” proposed by Agency for Cultural Affairs and “Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit Methods of Wooden

Houses” proposed by the Japan Building Disaster Prevention Association have been used. Although the consistency between the

current methods and the test results has been examined, the hanging walls of the specimens are not tall and the analysis is not enough

about shear force and deformation performance of the columns, flexural strength of the columns and limit deformation evaluation of

the frame structures with hanging walls.

Therefore, the purpose of this study is demonstrative elucidation of dynamic characteristics of timber frame structures with large

hanging walls in order to construct a reasonable and practical seismic evaluation method. First, we conduct static loading tests of

timber frame structures with full walls or large hanging walls. The height of the full wall specimens and the large hanging wall

specimens is 2.70m and 3.87m, respectively. The span length of the specimens is 1.82m. The height of hanging walls is 1.80m. The

specification of walls and the number of spans are experimental variables. Second, we analyze damage states and mechanical

characteristics of the specimens and their elements such as mud wall, columns and Sashigamoi. Finally, we reveal the applicability

and problems of the current methods based on the test results.

The major findings obtained from the research are summarized as follows:

a) Different specifications of Nuki do not make much difference of the hysteresis characteristics of the full wall specimens in

spite of the different failure states of walls.

b) The hysteresis characteristics of the large hanging walls can be calculated using the hysteresis characteristics of the full wall

specimens which have the same specification of wall.

c) Timber frames with hanging walls do not lose the restoring force immediately after breakage of columns because the broken

columns have the restoring force. Within this study, rotational angle of the specimens is more than about 1/15 rad when the

restoring force decreases to 80% of the maximum value.

d) Shear force of a column is not depend on only the sum of half of the distances from the column to the adjacent columns on the

both sides, because shear force is affected by the sectional performance and Young’s modulus of the column, the location of

the column against the loading direction and breakage of the surrounding columns. In addition, we indicated that it is need to

consider rotational deformation of columns at column-Sashigamoi joints in evaluation of deformation of timber frames with

hanging walls. From the above, it is revealed that there is room for improvement on the current methods in seismic

performance evaluation of timber frames with large hanging walls.

EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON SEISMIC PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF TRADITIONAL TIMBER FRAME STRUCTURES WITH LARGE HANGING WALLS

Saki OHMURA*, Yasuhiro NAMBU**, Yoshihiro SHIBUYA***, Mina SUGINO**** and Yasuhiro HAYASHI*****

* Grad. Stud., Dept. of Architecture and Architectural Eng., Kyoto Univ. ** Grad. Stud., Dept. of Architecture and Architectural Eng., Kyoto Univ., M.Eng.,

JSPS Research Fellow, DC1 *** Kansai Electric Power Co., Inc., M.Eng.

**** Assist. Prof., Dept. of Architecture and Architectural Eng., Kyoto Univ., Dr.Eng. ***** Prof., Dept. of Architecture and Architectural Eng., Kyoto Univ., Dr.Eng.

(2015 年 10 月 8 日原稿受理,2016 年 5 月 24 日採用決定)

─ 1489 ─

構造系 727号�

Page 12: 大垂壁を有する伝統木造軸組架構の耐震性能評価に …2. 9 2 2.1 0è9 / W1 _0è9 / b M0t &g M r S /²1 _ 0è9 / b Ù ] í' 3U 5 5 W í b q X > | g7ü$× 9 ì b ¡

構造系 727号�