Upload
emerald-riley
View
215
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
OECD Water Programme
Pillar 1, Output 1“Pricing Water Resources and Water & Sanitation Services”
World Water WeekStockholm, 16-22 August 2008
2
Overview
1. Objectives and scope of the Report
2. Expert Meeting of 14-15 Nov. 2007
3. Progress to date
4. Draft outline of the Report
5. Conceptual framework
6. Data: The WATSAN pricing survey
7. Next Steps
3
Objectives and Scope of the ReportQuestions addressed are related to HWP policy questions•How to improve the use of water pricing for water service provision to ensure financial sustainability of providers and access by all to affordable services
•How to improve the use of water pricing and other economic incentives to encourage management of water resources (and associated watersheds) that is both economically efficient and environmentally effective
Scope was defined based on feedback by experts•Provide updated survey of current state of the art in pricing literature
•Identify key challenges and role of pricing in addressing them
•Identify obstacles faced by policy-makers in designing pricing strategies
•Develop conceptual framework to help policy-makers address trade-offs
•Collect and analyse reliable data and case studies (OECD and non-OECD)
•Provide guidance to improve the effectiveness of water pricing strategies
Expert Meeting of 14-15 Nov. 2007Around 50 participants. Geographic & background
diversity.
Expert recommendations regarding the Report:• Take this opportunity to clarify key concepts
• Focus on multiple policy objectives and trade-offs between them
• Look beyond the pricing of water services
• Look beyond prices. Focus on their determinants, e.g. costs
• Address the political economy of reform
• Contextualise results and policy guidance
In addition, the experts suggested the following:• OECD as a “Water Observatory”
• Broad consultation strategy on the Report4
5
Progress to Date
Since the Expert Meeting of Nov.2007, the Secretariat:
1. Defined a conceptual framework and draft outline
2. Collected data on water and wastewater tariffs for domestic and industrial users
3. Identified information gaps
4. Launched consulting contracts for studies (more needed)
5. Ensured coordination within the HWP
6. Carried out extensive external coordination and consultation, aimed at validating & disseminating results
6
Draft Outline of the Report1. The policy context
• Key threats and challenges• Where des the policy debate stand?
2. The conceptual framework • Multiple policy objectives and the trade-offs between them
3. Experiences from OECD & non-OECD countries• Investment needs and costs of operation, maintenance, replacement• Pricing policies and trends
4. Policy analysis• Performance of pricing strategies to address policy objectives,
tradeoffs
5. From theory to practice: The political economy of reform• Institutional, political and implementation issues• Implementing pricing policy reforms: towards the virtuous circle
6. Policy conclusions
7
Conceptual Framework1. Water as a multi-faceted commodity: Need to tailor pricing
• Natural vs. man-made capital
• Different types of WATSAN services
2. Key policy challenges• Water resources availability and quality
• Sustainable and affordable access to adequate WATSAN services for all
3. Conflicting policy objectives: 4 sustainability dimensions• Ecological, economic, financial and social sustainability
• Understanding the trade-offs
4. Implications for the design of water pricing policies• Different conceptions of “pricing” in relation with the four sustainabilities
• Understanding the water value chain
This framework also informs the scoping paper for the Pricing Strategies topic of the Finance Theme for the 2009 World Water Forum
8
Data: The WATSAN Pricing Survey1. A survey of 171 OECD and 85 non-OECD utilities was carried out
in collaboration with Global Water Intelligence (GWI)
2. A consultant, working within the Secretariat, collected publicly available data on pricing for domestic and industrial users
3. Information gaps were identified on, among other issues:• Costs: levels, components, efficiency, cost recovery levels
• Institutional framework aspects
4. Ongoing work aimed at minimizing work for country experts and maximising utility of collected information for use in the Report
5. Main challenges:• Closing the information gaps, especially on costs/efficiency
• Relevant geographic level of data collection and analysis, aggregation
6. Experts’ recommendation: OECD as a “Water Observatory”? Possible synergies with existing OECD databases
9
Thank you!!
www.oecd.org/water/
Linkages between pricing, financing and the role of stakeholders
Resource use fee Environmental taxes Subsidies
Bulk price Market prices Contributions Subsidies
Product prices Taxes Retail price
Direct costs
Owner of the natural resource
Resource management
system
OPERATOR
FINAL USER
Industrial system STATE
Suppliers of inputs
Suppliers of inputs
Transactions along the value chain of the water sector
The service provider and the 4 markets
Economic and financial flows in WS&S Public budget
Taxation
Operator
Private partner
Consumers
Responsible entity
Market for goods, services,
labour & capital
Tariffs
Industrial costsFinancial costs
Industrial costsFinancial costs
Lease canons
DividendsCapital gain
Royalties
Dividends
Transfer prices
Transfers
Industrial costsFinancial costs
AssetownershipInvestment
MaintenanceRenewal
Extension
Owner ofproperty rights on
water resourcesWater taxes
Ear-markedsubsidies
Fiscal
Direct cost of self-supply
II market
III market
IV market
I market
Bulk supply operators
Environmental sustainability Discourage depletion of critical natural capital
Equity Guarantee that “merit uses” have due access to water
resources under fair and equitable conditions
Guarantee ecological functions of water natural capital
Minimize the recourse to “supply side” Minimize the alteration of natural outflow
patterns
Identify “water needs” ( basic environmental functions) Keep level and dynamics of prices below the threshold that
makes it unaffordable for some users Achieve an equitable and democratically accepted way to
share the cost of managing water resources Guarantee financial stability of water
systems Compensate adequately economic resources
that are used as inputs Cash flows should guarantee the
conservation of value of physical assets Each new infrastructure binds the next
generation to cover its cost in the future minimize the creation of artificial capital
Allocative efficiency: available water should be allocated in order to privilege uses with the highest social value
Allocative efficiency: the cost of provision of water services (to non-merit uses) should be confronted to their value
X-efficiency: costs should be as close as possibile to the minimum (intended in dynamic terms)
Not encourage over-capacity, over-staffing, gold-plating etc Cost coverage should be intended as for efficient costs only Regulation should ensure an optimal allocation of risks
among shareholders, users and taxpayers Financial sustainability Guarantee long term reproduction of physical assets
Efficiency
Guarantee that water is allocated to its most beneficial uses and economic resources are not wasted
Sustainability in 4 objectives
Taxes / subsidies
Governance Issues
Ecological constraints
Water Management Infrastructure
Available Environmental
Functions
Desired Environmental functions
Stakeholder 3 ...
… Stakeholder n
Stakeholder 2
Stakeholder 1
Environmental and Economic Sustainability Indicators
Stakeholders satisfaction Indicators
Price / cost
Institutional constraints
The conceptual framework for Carrying Capacity
WMS1 WMS2 WMSn
Public budget
…
Water users
WMS1 WMS2 WMSn
Public budget
…
Water users
Taxes
Subsidies
Water charges
WMS1 WMS2 WMSn
Bulk suppliers
…
Water users
Bulk prices (equal)
Water charges
WMS1 WMS2 WMSn
Regional water agencies
…
Water users
Water charges
Ear-marked taxes
Ear-marked subsidies (contribution to investment)