Upload
ledan
View
219
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Jason M. Evans, PhD Environmental Policy Program
Carl Vinson Institute of Government
http://www2.wsav.com/mgmedia/image/294/0/26340/viewer_sends_photos_of_tybee_flooding/
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_UZCeUDMh1X4/SxV0euA9iAI/AAAAAAAADak/9kl5bAkCgdk/s400/Tybee+Roads.jpg
October 28, 2013 Local Government Challenges in Dealing with Rising Seas
Yulee, FL
Most densely developed barrier island in Georgia
~3000 year round residents
~2000 seasonal residents
Popular tourist beach for Savannah area
22.1
22.2
22.3
22.4
22.5
22.6
22.7
22.8
22.9
23
23.1
23.2
1935 1945 1955 1965 1975 1985 1995 2005
F
e
e
t
R
e
v
i
s
e
d
l
o
c
a
l
r
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
Sea level rise at Ft. Pulaski
1935 - 2010
Data source: Natural Environment Research Council Data authority: National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration http://www.psmsl.org/data/obtaining/stations/395.php
Local trend of approximately 1 foot rise over 100 years
Primary funding
• NOAA Sea Grant Community Climate Adaptation Initiative (February 2012 – January 2014)
Partners
• City of Tybee Island
• Georgia Sea Grant (PI – Chuck Hopkinson)
• Carl Vinson Institute of Government • Lead facilitation and GIS-based benefit/cost modeling
• UGA College of Environment and Design
• UGA Marine Extension Services
• Catalysis Adaptation Partners • Facilitation support and technical support for adaptation costing
• Georgia DNR Coastal Resources Division
• Chatham-Savannah Metropolitan Planning Commission
http://www.swedishwaterhouse.se/galleries/images/blog2012/Ven-Diagram.jpg?__scale=c:transparent,t:4,r=0,q=70,w:396,h:252
Virtue Pragmatism
Infrastructure Design life Sea level rise range
Municipal water distribution
30 – 60 years 0.4 – 2.7 feet
Wastewater and stormwater pipes
30 – 60 years 0.4 – 2.7 feet
Sewage treatment facilities
~ 50 years 0.5 – 2.3 feet
Bridges 75 years or more 0.75 – 4.0 feet
Right of ways (highways and utilities)
100+ years 1.0 – 6.0 feet
Adapted from Deyle 2009
Front island beach erosion ◦ Loss of tourism
◦ Decreased storm surge buffer
Flooding of US80 ◦ Decreased tourism access
◦ Increased potential for stranding in emergency situations
Back island erosion and tidal flooding ◦ Increased flooding of marsh front yards and homes
◦ Stormwater drainage problems in SW island at high tides
Protect, or “Stand and Defend” ◦ Sea walls, levees, storm surge gates
Accommodate, or “Buy Some Time” ◦ Beach renourishments, elevate infrastructure
Avoid, or “Stay Out of the Way” ◦ Zoning setbacks, build outside of hazard zones
Retreat, or “Get Out of the Way ◦ Rolling easements, buy outs, abandon unusable
infrastructure Adapted from Deyle 2009
Sea walls and levees ◦ Very expensive to
permit and construct
◦ Maintenance expenses will increase over time
◦ Radically alter beach and marsh dynamics
http://sav-cdn.com/sites/default/files/imagecache/superphoto/6792890.jpg
http://www.wired.com/images/article/magazine/1701/ff_dutch_delta_levees_f.jpg
Dutch example
Beach renourishment ◦ Expense, scaling,
potential environmental concerns
Elevate infrastructure
◦ Expense, scaling, potential environmental concerns
US 80 (May 6, 2012, 9:50pm) http://coastalnewstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Tybee-Island-Renourishment-Plan.jpg
http://climatetechwiki.org/sites/climatetechwiki.org/files/images/teaser/media%20image%201.jpg
Zoning setbacks to avoid future hazards ◦ Uncertainty in sea
level rise projections create difficulties for long range planning
◦ Creates conflicts with vested property rights
Rolling easements as sea encroaches
No rebuild in high hazard zone after disaster strikes
Adapted from Deyle 2009
Hurricane Opal, Florida panhandle 1995 Deyle 2009
Plan for rate of 2060 sea level rise equivalent to
2.3 feet (High)
1.3 feet (Intermediate)
We also included linear trend sea level rise:
0.6 feet (Low)
Raise water well facilities above 100 year flood height
Raise US80 to 3 feet above current grade
Continue renourishing beaches to keep up with sea level rise
Upgrade drainage infrastructure in southwest island
Build 4 foot sea wall over current MHHW in southwest island
t
Predicted tidal flood extent with 9.6 ft MLLW tide (Ft. Pulaski reference)
Approximate annual
“king tide flood” currently
Inundation model
Predicted tidal flood extent with 10.1 ft MLLW tide (Ft. Pulaski reference)
Annual “king tide flood” at 6 inches sea level rise
Inundation Model
King tide flood with 6 inches sea level rise
Pipe Flow Model
(Based on Georgia Coastal LiDAR Elevation DEM at 3ft cell size)
King tide flood 6 inches sea level rise
Tide Gate Model
(Based on Georgia Coastal LiDAR Elevation DEM at 3ft cell size)
Sea Level Rise by 2060 Avoided building
damages and economic
activity loss
(Net Present Value)
Approximate year that
annual bank overflow
begins (~0.75 feet of sea
level rise)
Linear Trend (0.6 feet) $2,100,000 2060 - 2070
Intermediate (1.3 feet) $3,500,000 2040 - 2050
High (2.3 feet) $3,300,000 2030 - 2035
All values from saltwater flooding of buildings only With additional benefits from freshwater flood mitigation and avoided losses to salt intolerant landscaping, likely a close to “no regrets” action under any scenario
Sea Level Rise Avoided property damages
and economic activity loss
through 2060
(Net Present Value)
~Year that annual bank
overflow begins (0.75 feet
of sea level rise)
Linear Trend (0.66 feet) $1,300,000 2067
Intermediate (1.3 feet) $1,100,000 2042
High (2.3 feet) $840,000 2033
Sea Level Rise Avoided structure
damage and
economic activity
loss through 2060
from sea wall
(Net Present Value)
Estimated cost *
($3500 /linear foot
and 2.5% annual
maintenance)
Benefit:Cost Ratio
Linear Trend
(0.6 ft)
$510,000 $25,000,000 0.02
Intermediate
(1.3 ft)
$6,500,000 $25,000,000 0.26
High
(2.3 ft)
$26,000,000 $25,000,000 1.04
*Permitting and potential mitigation costs not directly factored
Local “patch up” of existing private bulkheads may provide similar benefits for at least two decades
February 28 sea level rise workshop in St. Marys:
125 attendees – including several elected and appointed local officials from Brunswick and St. Marys